Obama Campaign On Palin: Divisive And Partisan
The Obama campaign's response to Sarah Palin's speech, from spokesperson Bill Burton, acknowledges its clearly successful delivery but seeks to highlight its slashing and partisan nature in hopes of taking the gloss off her a bit:
""The speech that Governor Palin gave was well delivered, but it was written by George Bush's speechwriter and sounds exactly like the same divisive, partisan attacks we've heard from George Bush for the last eight years. If Governor Palin and John McCain want to define 'change' as voting with George Bush 90% of the time, that's their choice, but we don't think the American people are ready to take a 10% chance on change."
The speech was harsh and negative but we highly doubt that it'll be received this way, and this suggests one reason she was chosen. McCain needed someone who could go on the attack while simultaneously striking an every-mom pose that might galvanize Republican women and perhaps appeal to aging white female Hillary voters while reinforcing McCain's efforts to cast himself as far more culturally in touch with ordinary Americans than Obama is.
With that in mind, this line from her speech seems worth dwelling on:
"I love those hockey moms. You know, they say the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick."
McCain now has his pit bull -- with lipstick.
One thing that remains to be seen: Whether her strong personality, her obviously effective advocacy on McCain's behalf, and her clear attack-dog skills will do anything to allay concerns about whether she's qualified to be back-up commander-in-chief.

I question the "successful delivery" theory. I was expecting an impassioned call to arms for both parties, but she made fun of him for being a community organizer. She made fun of Obama for being a community organizer in the South side of Chicago. Enough said. I am stoked after this. She is completely out of touch.
September 3, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
They just don't get it.
September 4, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Her best line was that under a McCain/Palin administration they will be "laying pipe" in Alaska. If there's one thing we know about the citizens of Wasilla, it's that they LOVE laying pipe.
September 4, 2008 7:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pit Bull in lipstick? She's George Bush in lipstick.
September 4, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Last night was red meat for the righties.
Nothing more.
September 4, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hate the right-wing media. Hate them. This is sooo pathetic. I am listening to the "liberal" msnbc network and I can't stand it. I was a "reagan democrat" and primarily a bush I supporter. Now, obviously I am clearly to the left of the clintons. I actually believe that bush I was to the left of the clintons as well. Nonetheless, has the country gone this wacked? I really don't get it. I just can't stand it anymore. What the f*ck is going on?
September 3, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're having an identity crisis. Sit back, relax and vote for Obama in November and the anxiety will go away.
September 4, 2008 6:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd say they've got their 45%. Solid, if wooden, performance that will appeal to Republicans.
But did she look vice-presidential? No.
Will this put to rest the questions that are swirling around her candidacy? No.
September 3, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bingo.
I LOL when she made the claim to be VP.
September 4, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
MSNBC is reporting that Joe Klein unloaded both barrels on the McCain campaign's sudden mediaphobia. Klein called on his colleagues to stand up to this sort of bullying, and to think he is going to keep quiet about the fact Palin raised taxes as governor, was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it, and thinks the Iraqi occupation is a mission from god is simply just nuts.
Let us hope the rolling over stops tonight. This was a facist speech. Rudy is King Facist Supreme.
September 3, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/times-joe-klein-slams-mccain-a.php
September 3, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love you.
O thank you.
September 3, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
when Toobin on CNN talks about the "delicious irony" of McCain bitching about media you know the fight is on.
September 3, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fascist, you mean. But she is something of a facist, too.
September 4, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rudy is a man in search of a balcony. The only thing missing from the stage was a black-shirted thug. They were outside beating up demonstrators.
September 4, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
When Rudy was denigrating the filth that is San Fransisco and Chicago, I kept waiting for him to mention New York as another pit of filth that must be destroyed...
Oh wait, that's Bin Laden's line.
New York's OK for small towns to maybe not hate enough to drag the faggots and intellectuals into rural re-education camps.
But we in Chicago? We have to LOOOOVE these small town salt of the earth types who - kind of just for sport - like to marinate in their own deep resentment.
Don't hate us 'cause were beautiful you salt of the earth small town Nazis.
September 4, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Rudy was denigrating the filth that is San Fransisco and Chicago, I kept waiting for him to mention New York as another pit of filth that must be destroyed...
Oh wait, that's Bin Laden's line.
New York's OK for small towns to maybe not hate enough to drag the faggots and intellectuals into rural re-education camps.
But we in Chicago? We have to LOOOOVE these small town salt of the earth types who - kind of just for sport - like to marinate in their own deep resentment.
Don't hate us 'cause were beautiful you salt of the earth small town Nazis.
September 4, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Rudy was denigrating the filth that is San Fransisco and Chicago, I kept waiting for him to mention New York as another pit of filth that must be destroyed...
Oh wait, that's Bin Laden's line.
New York's OK for small towns to maybe not hate enough to drag the faggots and intellectuals into rural re-education camps.
But we in Chicago? We have to LOOOOVE these small town salt of the earth types who - kind of just for sport - like to marinate in their own deep resentment.
Don't hate us 'cause were beautiful you salt of the earth small town Nazis.
September 4, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
If nastiness, cattiness and sarcasm are what someone is looking for in a Veep, she's got their vote.
September 3, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Palin = Rudy 2.0
September 3, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, she does look a lot better than Rudy in women's clothing, although his fashion sense was a little better.
September 4, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
THIS is who Palin is - and now she's been introduced.
September 4, 2008 7:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
The media is gaga over Palin now. David Brooks had a big wet spot on his pants. Watch for the media narrative to turn now. She's the darling now. The first thing Diane Sawyer did was to coo about the the girl smoothing the baby's hair down.
Here's something I didn't even know. McPants didn't even do an FBI check on Palin before naming her. And his people LIED about it.
September 3, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
They don't want to look like they are ganging up on a newcomer.
Hard questions will follow - maybe not from BoBo - but hell, what do you expect? It's BoBo. And Diane Sawyer? o ho ho.
But I don't think all those questions that have been raised just went *poof* because of one lousy, catty, sarcastic, lying speech.
September 3, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Talking about wet spots gregory is soaking wet. He is estatic and spewing all over the place. I really can't believe that people consider that hack a journalist. He actually should be a freaking war criminal and locked up for helping perpetuate the lies leading our country to war and he is sporting major wood all over the republicans. Disgusting.
September 3, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Folks, the audience for this is about 85% Republican. (Not a lot of Dems are as masochistic as we are.) So the media is going to play to the crowd, and look on the bright side.
Don't get worked up about it. Watching PBS it was perfectly clear that they all held the evening in contempt. "This will work with the base" means "we hold this speech in utter contempt." Even Brooks said that policy was lacking.
September 4, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, I needed that. I've had a sick feeling ever since Romney took the stage and had to leave the room during Pain's speech.
Since I'm a lefty, I never know when my take on things coincides with middle America. Glad to hear the NewsHour wasn't buying.
September 4, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are people who will vote for her because she's cute. She's a mom! They won't look into the truth behind her statements about her flip-flop on the Bridge to Nowhere, the troopergate scandal, the Alaska Independence Party secessionists, the big deficit she left Wasilla with when she followed her ambitions and ran for Governor. My brain-damaged dad voted for Bush in 2004 because he didn't like Theresa Heinz Kerry and Laura Bush is so nice.
In those cases, Rick Davis is right. People don't care about issues. They choose their candidate on a composite of personality traits.
September 4, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are voices of dissent in the media: David Gergen, Bill Schneider, Jeffrey Toogin.
The chorus will go as the speech and Palin are further scrutinized.
The internet will not allow a major party to "hide" a candidate as it could in the past (like Quayle).
Tonight's Sarah Palin Hate Fest will be compared in the future to Pat Buchanan's cultural war speech.
September 4, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oo, I like it when you talk sexy!
:)
September 4, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
My wife and her two sisters (one an AP repoter) watched project runway. It didn't even occur to them to watch.
September 4, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Totally agree -- watching Gergen and Eugene Robinson carefully stare at each word as they enunciated it. And Rachael M and Robinson snuck in some nice juicy FACTS (about the Jews for Jesus minister, Bridge to Nowhere farce, a couple of other things). I'd rather they speak mildly and get those seeds of doubt planted in an audience that (for the most part) would just tune out if they said what they really thought.
September 4, 2008 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
The lie was that the FBI vets political party candidates. They don't. Political parties are private, not governmental, entities. The FBI can no more vet Sarah Palin for McPow than they could have vetted Carly Fiorina for Hewlett-Packard.
September 4, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain managed to steal much of the thunder from Obama's acceptance speech. Palin has managed to dominate every news cycle since McCain announced his choice. Because it was a story like those on the Springer show, it dominated everything. All news was superseded by the Palin family drama. Pregnant daughter trumps Palin's dismal record as mayor and governor.
Now she will be sequestered from interviews and only quoted from Bush-speechwriter prepared material.
It's time to take the news cycle back.
September 4, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can see it now, the ads with Hillary taking down Gov Plain.
September 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dream on. The clintons won't do sh*t except in a backhanded way help mcbush. Give it up. They are playing for 2012. I just loved the clintons statement about palin. We got better comments from republican women. What does that tell you?
September 4, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I'm not one to talk up the Clintons (in fact, I've been fairly ready to criticize). But, in this case, I have to say, yeah, don't expect Hillary to come to the rescue. But, I wouldn't ascribe nefarious motives to that, either. If Hillary or Bill came out on the attack against Mistress Sarah, it would backfire on the Dems. Obama is, and has been, about message control. What Hillary said about Palin was no different from what Obama/Biden said - it was gracious and fairly neutral and she's leaving the rest of it to the folks who are running the campaign. If she was asked to do more, I'm thinking that she would.
September 4, 2008 7:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am convinced that Hillary will do all that the Obama campaign asks and will not do anything the campaign tells her it doesn't want her to do. The idea that she or Bill would try to undercut Obama's campaign is ridiculous and I wish people would give it a rest.
Everyone agrees that are smart. Everyone would agree they are calculating and self-interested to some extent--some would say no more so than any other good politicians and others would say more so than any political couple since the Italian Renaissance.
Whatever. The bottom line is that if they are, in fact, smart--and we all agree they are--their actions will be exactly the same as they would if their motives were pristine. regardless of whether their hearts are totally in the right placeor whether they are more villianous and conniving couple than Boris and Natasha. They will do nothing overt or covert to harm the Obama campaign and will do everything they are asked to do by the campaign enthusiastically. If their hearts are in the right place, they'll do it because they genuinely want us to win. If they are Boris and Natasha, they'll do it because the slightest hint of backstabbing will doom them politically and they know it.
September 4, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
The response from Burton is limp to me.
This speech was nothing but mean and nasty, peppered with those cute little analogies.
But c'mon, Bill. This was an Obama boilerplate response that I'm quite honestly so tired of hearing. Address the speech directly. And don't even give it the compliment of being well-delivered. It was canned.
September 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
God, the red meat came out in full force tonite. All the speeches tonight and especially, Palin's speech certainly gives the dems the green light to lower both barrels at them. Nothing but a speech to the base and we must get ready to have an extreme cultural war! The total effect of the GOP is to attack, attack and let the blood fly! I'm so ready to fight the neo-cons and the porn star, Palin! Give often and plenty to Obama so fight fire with fire!
September 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I knew this was coming - it's all they've got.
I been saying - get out the umbrellas - as soon as this thing is over, it's coming - they'll unload everything. Shit demons are coming our way.
*sigh*
September 3, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fuck these assholes. No more getting pontificated at by fucking half-brained, religiously preoccupied self-righteous scum. This smug little harpie wasn't even qualified to run her igloo settlement but has the audacity to wax superior? Voters, blast these idiots into the vapor of oblivion, please, so that, for the first time in eight years, I can actually pronounce the word "President" and be willing to say someone's name after it.
September 4, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ms. Wasilla did nothing to prove she knew anything about foreign policy. She just read a speech someone else wrote for her. That wont do in the debates, she can spew all the hate speech she wants............but wait until she is challenged about her lies during the debate.
September 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Notice the two or three details ("the Caucuses")that were thrown in about Russia, Iran, etc? Classic essay test bullshit meant to look like she's really studied foreign relations rather than the cram session you know she got yesterday.
She probably thinks Fareed Zakaria was the 23rd highjacker.
September 4, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama's campaign needs a stronger response than that. She has proven that she is tough, so let's throw some punches of our own. Her speech was full of lies about Obama's record and her own. Call her on it.
September 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ya can't say she's tough when using a scripted speech written by someone else. Let's see how she stands on two feet next to Biden when the hardball are being thrown in the debates.
September 4, 2008 7:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow...that was a pretty bad idea. We'll see how it plays. It was well delivered for what it was, a kind of mean highschoolish mockery. I can't believe that goes down well in the end. We'll see. They had to do something to hide the intellectual poverty of their candidate, and I think that's maybe the best they could do.
September 3, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. This is playing to the base. But the base is smaller in number. So it's a losing strategy.
McBush-Rove only have one playbook. They are apparently able to try anything new. Which is fine with me, because they will lose.
September 3, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a RFO (Republican for Obama). My two cents, I think the speech was good. For God sake she has a degree in journalism. I expected that. I cant wait for the debate.... Clearly she was placed to slap Barack and Michelle. Good move Karl Rove. The fight is on. Please folks, lets donate. Just did $50.00
September 3, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think she had to appeal to Hillary's Democrats and she just alienated the hell out of them. How can you make fun of someone for being a community organizer in South Chicago? This is something we can all respect and she just destroyed her credibility. It would be like Obama making fun of McCain's service.
I will never see her or Rudy the same after making fun of someone for trying to make a difference in the world.
September 3, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. I think she has to appeal to rural and small town voters who vote GOP. She needs to turn this base out. It has nothing to do with Hillary voters--that's simply put out by the GOP so ole John can appeal to the Hillary supporters in the burbs. Palin won't be going near suburbs or urban areas at all.
My two cents.
September 4, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
She did a great job with what you are talking about, but I just think the other base is way too excited to let this one slip away. She convinced me that she is bad for the country and has no business in national government. Palin = Rudy. I was expecting something more.
I'm sick of this narrative thing. It was the plan all along that she would be accused of being knocked down so she could get right back up. That is B.S.
She lost all respect in my mind when she made fun of him being a community organizer.
September 4, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Community organizer is a job for the metro areas. Her line will play well where she will be sent to campaign.
All of this is what we should have come to expect from the GOP. I suspect that a few of us Dems had a bit of grudging respect for McCain and didn't think the OLD straight shooter would veer into negative territory. That notion needs to be buried six feet under tonight.
These two are in the campaign to win. And this should cause warning bells to be clanging away.
September 4, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
In the VP debate, Biden may have a chance to ask what's so wrong with wanting to help people, wanting to do what you can despite not holding a position of power?
Community organizing sounds to me like a pretty darned American way to serve. Kinda like the PTA, right?
She really went way, way negative, and has opened up a line of attack that has nothing to do with her record (which also can be attacked), or her family (which rightly should not).
September 4, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Community organizer (lip curl) is a dogwhistle to the racists in the GOP. Only 1.5 percent of the GOP delegates are black, compared to almost 25 percent of the Dem delegates.
September 4, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
They already had these voters. The idea that these people (wing nuts) would have stayed home on election day because McCain wasn't their first choice is such horse shit to me. These are people who never stay home on election day and who never vote Dem. Ever.
Let's remember how this goes down people: Kerry states plus one. I know, I know, fifty state strategy. That would be cool. But that isn't what it takes to win the EC. Kerry plus one. Palin's nom does nothing to bring EC votes that McCain didn't already have.
Let's also remember that the spread in the last election was 3 million votes. You know who those 3 million were? Independent terror voters, particularly women. Palin does nothing to get their vote. She is the catty bitch who stole your boyfriend in highschool. If McInsane wanted female votes, he should have asked Christie Todd Whitman.
September 4, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Respectfully, I suspect you have not actually canvassed and actually talked to possible voters. A voter who doesn't see any difference between two candidates is a voter who won't roll out of bed and vote. A voter who thinks one candidate will easily win won't roll out of bed and vote. When one talks to potential voters, I assure you these folks can be identified.
September 4, 2008 8:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
no offensive to other journalism majors but you could be passed out and still get a major in journalism. Hell just look at the so called journalist at the MSM a freakin comedy show does there jobs 1000 times better.
September 3, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well except I read today that Karl Rove wanted Romney and really pressured McLame and McLame got mad and chose Bitchy instead.
So your theory doesn't jive with the current information that I have.
Read it on HuffPo.
She wasn't good, in my opinion. Not at all - and I'm not just being subjective. I really don't think she got there. At times I thought she was coming close and I thought she might - but she never did, as far as I'm concerned.
She was - Adequate. Barely.
September 4, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's what I saw as well.
Nothing that would reassure people who have doubts about her.
September 4, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's what I saw as well. A kind of highschool girl speech that mostly ran to petty attacks. I was embarassed by the pettiness of them.
I think she won't play. I come from a working class family, second generation American, and first to get advanced degrees. All that stuff. But just because people are working class doesn't mean they don't have a sense of decorum and of what's appropriate, and this speech was totally lacking in either of those things. This wasn't a county fair, there was way too much family introduction and story. And it just had no seriousness, no respect for the high office Sara Palin's just been nominated to.
And there was no policy, no specifics. All sloganeering. Change Washington? How? Reform government? How? Work for American workers? How?
Oh, by keeping George Bush's tax cuts.
Other than that, we will win in Iraq and make America victorious around the world. How?
It doesn't resonate. And she doesn't ring authentic. She just doesn't. I was afraid I would like her, just as another woman. And I was much relieved to find that I didn't. I found her really offputtingactually7 Definitely not the kind you sit around the kitchen table with, definitely not the kind of woman she wants to appeal to. And, again, I come from women like that. I've spent my life around the kitchen table.
And, trust me, she's the kind of woman who puts real salt of the earth women off. They know in an instant she wants your husband's eyes to pop out at her, and she'll do you down if she can.
So no, this is not a woman's woman. Not by a long shot, and unless you've got the lives of fetuses first and foremost in your brain this woman sets off alarm bells.
And please, someone, get that baby off camera. That is extremely offensive. What is he? Her human shield? No one can attack me now.
Noun verb POW. Noun verb Down's Syndrome Trig.
Ooh puke.
To me the only pleasant surprise of the evening was seeing Cindy McCain with her hair washed.
September 4, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh you gave me a good chuckle with that Cindy McCain and her hair finally washed.
LoL
September 4, 2008 1:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's still having her clothes made from Muppets remnants, though...
September 4, 2008 1:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
The family is off limits except when she wants the baby paraded and passed around. Cuz the GOP is all about babies.
September 4, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's still an inexperienced unknown from Alaska, who gave a mediocre speech that seem to only rouse the base audience in that convention.
She's a risk to be a heartbeat away from the Oval office and underscores the poor judgment decision of John McCain who selected her.
September 3, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Greg - The idea that Palin could appeal to "aging white females" who voted for Hillary is a bit off base.
She appeals more to women who view themselves as not feminist, and would be insulted if you labeled them as such. It's like the people in Kansas who balk at "liberal" policies that are actually trying to help them. Call it ignorance, call it perverted but I don't think that women who like Sarah Palin, in any way consider themselves to be in the mold of the average Hillary supporter.
September 3, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agrippina, my guess is that she won't play with any women very well. This "babe" clearly is not what she puts out, her inauthenticity practically oozes out of her pores, and the first people to get a whiff of the phoniness will be other women, and they won't need degrees and pedigrees to do it.
I think it's rural small town mother types that she'll offend most, with that baby shoved in their faces all the time. I mean, you've got to be deaf dumb and blind not to see what a cheap publicity stunt she's turning that child into, for her own advancement.
September 4, 2008 1:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
The baby is not going to be a selling point for women voters. Not by a long shot. And truly socially conservative women are going to be horrified that she's campaigning for VP with four kids and a special-needs baby at home. Hell, it didn't even go over well with some of the left-leaning feminist types I've encountered IRL.
September 4, 2008 8:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Drop the "aging white Hillary supporters" because the voters this gal is going after are the rural and small town voters--the classic GOP supporters for some time now. She is there to charge up the GOP base and she should be able to do exactly that and keep their turnout numbers high.
Don't expect a more polished appearance from this gal--ever. That's not what she is needed for.
September 3, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can't shine sh*t by the way. I am going to go hurl now. I really can't believe that this nonsense is happening.
September 3, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way - between "gal" and how she's supposed to appeal to rural voters - isn't that a bit condescending to people in rural America and small towns?
September 4, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Gal" is condescending comes from the foulest mouth on TPM? That's rich, Tena.
Look, small town and rural areas contain majority GOP supporters with a minority of Dems. It's a matter of keeping one's base energized to vote and the opposing base demoralized so they won't vote in November. The genius of Karl Rove was knowing exactly which areas he could rely on to have an energized GOP and a demoralized Dem.
I don't have an elitist atttitude about where the voters are and what motivates those voter. I'm merely giving you my forecast based on my experiences. There's nothing elitist about that. But I'm sure you can come up with a foul quip about it.
September 4, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pit bull, eh? So, does this mean Biden has full license to tase the pit bull? Or would that be seen as beating up on the pretty lady?
September 3, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's in a jam. If he does a frontal attack, they will trot out any and all kinds of bogus arguments about his being sexist, etc. He needs to be deft, witty, and smart. He needs to concentrate on facts and issues.
On the other hand, Hillary would and could make mincemeat out of Sarah.
September 4, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can't believe the crowd shots. Old country-club couples and frat boys. So painfully white.
My wife kept making fun of her voice. Frankly, I came into this ready to like Palin -- she has seemed likable enough in other video clips. But I thought she seemed intensely unlikable. Maybe it was just the partisan and negative character of the speech. But I also think there's something about her voice that comes across as smug, parochial, and censorious.
But then, that's pretty much a definition of "Republican," so I guess it will play well with the base.
September 3, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's no way that voice gets her or her sugar daddy elected. This will not wear well.
September 4, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a WEAK response! Why don't you just give John a blowjob while youre at it, Barack?
September 3, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Bill Burton's response was lame as usual. Why release a statement? Release a slew of negative ads showing how out of touch Palin is.
September 3, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry. They'll get on it in their own time and with not only effectiveness, but good taste. Burton's just treading water right now.
September 4, 2008 1:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does the "kill, kill, kill" chorus never learn? A successful attack is about timing and resonance. Emotional sniping doesn't equal smart strategy. Palin introduced herself to the country tonight by being a nasty, sarcastic, hateful Rudy clone. The media response is going to be far from universally adoring. Why would they mess with that? Especially without waiting to see how the response settles.
September 4, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
They didn't take the bait. McCain is counting on this becoming a culture war. Not about issues (as Rick Davis admitted), but about cultural/personality issues. If that happens, there's a good chance Obama loses. If this is about where McCain and Obama respectively want to take the country, Obama wins.
In short, I think there response is right. It calls the speech what it was and reminds folks what the issues are in this election. Anything else feeds the beast and gives him control of the narrative.
At least that's my 2 cents worth.
September 4, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
And it's on message:
McCain = Bush.
September 4, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reminds me of the 1992 convention, the declaration of the culture wars. It was hateful and divisive. It didn't play well.
September 3, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
hateful and divisive
Exactly. Pretty much sums up the night and the Republican party these days.
September 3, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't "punch back" since that's undoubtedly what they want. I would just point out the untruths, and suggest the speech wasn't fully vetted.
September 3, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's a distraction. Punch back always at McCain.
September 3, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry but the media is NOT totally embracing her at ALL
September 3, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
This speech was really infuriating. Sneering contempt seems to be the Republican strategy of this decade, but there must be a certain point where even your average doesn't-pay-attention-to-politics man on the street is able to instinctively call bullshit. It's suiting that Palin was comparing her job as governor of Alaska to Obama's work as a community organizer 20 years ago, since she is now about as accomplished as he was then. In my book, first black editor-in-chief of the Harvard Law Review beats small town mayor any day of the week and is also a more likely indicator of intellectual wherewithal than governorship of a state barely larger than Staten Island.
Tonight we saw an exercise in risibly unjustified, substance-free jeering followed by bellowing, boffo laughter from the convention hall. Republican hard-liners obviously aren't going to be turned off by this, but my instinct says that the McCain campaign is dangerously close to backlash territory if they haven't already arrived there. There's a certain point where this becomes offensive to even ordinary people, and these petty distractions—unlike the fake "questions" raised about John Kerry's service—don't even have the patina of substance. They are nothing more than mockery, by someone unquestionably far less accomplished, of an unquestionably remarkable leader who has secured the Democratic nomination against what many thought were impossible odds. I really think they're treading on dangerous ground here.
September 3, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and could the spineless Democrats own their own strengths for once? Sheesh, last week the Obamas edited the Ivy League out of their resumes. Sure be the south side girl Michelle but own that Princeton degree. Own your law degree. The election will be won or lost in the suburbs. Those voters don't all aspire to be trailer trash. Sell American aspiration but sell it differently. Sell your own cultural values. Will you stop running away from them for once!
September 4, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I absolutely agree, because it re-emphasizes what a contemptible mediocrity this igloo-dwelling harpie really is. Maybe elitism emerges as a result of genuinely being elite - like, fuck you, presumptuous hick bitch. Own your superiority, Barack and Michelle! If the insecure react to superiority as "elitism", that those who are superior in this race should call out inferiority and unpreparedness for what it is.
September 4, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
None of this will work.
They completely turned off Independents and maybe even some moderate Republicans.
And for the second consecutive night, no speaker gave any details about a single solitary issue. They've abandoned running on issues and have gone to the the "throw red meat at the base" strategy.
Giuliani and Palin just lost the election for McCain.
Oh, and all of the dirt on Palin will come out fast and furious from the Obama campaign now. She just threw away her "grace" card because she possesses none. She showed herself to be mean-spirited and petty not deserving of respect.
Game on.
September 3, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh's observation sums it up.
From the transcript of Sarah Palin's speech leaked to the press:
"...in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to...build more new-clear plants..."
Potatoe.
September 3, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that like an orthopedic shoe? Putting new-clear on the teleprompter is supposed to keep her from saying nukyular?
September 4, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Obama needs to hit back but I think the better aim at McCain. Palin is a distraction and a sideshow. McCain is their target.
Palin is a bottomless pit of freaky family problems, fringy views, small town gossip, and passive-aggressive cries of sexism. I would respond to her only in passing and with polite disdain.
Palin = Weapon of Mass Distraction
September 3, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Weapon of Mass Defecation.
September 4, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree. The focus needs to be on and stay on McCain.
September 4, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm going to quote something from Sullivan, even though it's off topic, because it was an incredibly hateful moment that should not be forgotten:
September 3, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was a lot of mocking of Barack Obama going on tonight.
I could hardly believe the out loud laughing by the crowd and Guilliani about the fact that Obama was a community organizer.
Really just juvenile and pathetic. Republicans should be embarrassed by the things said tonight by Guiliani and Palin. (Of course they're not, but they should be.)
September 4, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Alex, I heard that line in Giuliani's speech, and also found it stuck (in a most unpleasant way).
I wonder, already, at any speech that scores a point by dragging the 'American Dream' in the mud -- 'only in America' as an attack!?
It also occurred to me that any African American hearing this speech, or frankly, anyone who had worked hard or whose kids had succeeded beyond expectations, would find this deeply repulsive.
The entire tone of the Republican Convention, from what I've seen and heard, seems to operate at about a third-grade level. Their guess, and hope, is that will resonate with the voters best. I hope that they're very very wrong.
September 4, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know it is the role of the VP to be the attack dog but she was introducing herself here and I don't think it helped her to be seen as hyper-partisan right out of the blocks. I grew up in a small town like alot of folks and I know her type well. Obviously wingnuts love her but I think she just turned many folks off that might have given her a chance.
Folks with pit bulls do not make good neighbors.
September 3, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, Obama cannot be gracious even once? Is it a problem with "women" or has he just realized that his 15-minutes are up? Palin framed him in a way that he will not be able to recover from.
I supported Clinton, have made clear I'd opt for McCain if she didn't win the nomination. Obama didn't give Clinton even the slightest respect. Still she outclassed him. Now, tonight, he's got Palin on his case and she's not constrained to be a loyal party member--she's found Obama's soft spot--inexperience. Just wait until she gets around to his lies.
Matthew
http://www.theproblemwithobama.com
September 3, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before we go any further. What are your positions on abortion, gays, the environment, gun control, health care, and early childhood education?
September 4, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
He doesn't give a shit. He's in favor of rancid resentment long past its sell-by date, and against everything else.
September 4, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
You don't get it, do you. The election is not necessarily about issues like that, it is about experience, character, integrity, and honesty. Obama fails on all accounts. What we will get is a McCain/Palin administration that will work with a Democratic Congress. And for the party, we get to clean house of Obama, Dean, Brazile, and the rest. It is a win-win all around. Well, that is except for the Dear Leader's cult following.
Matthew
http://www.theproblemwithobama.com
September 4, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Weaver, the extent to which you no longer get it is really sad.'
The Crazy Loony Right Wing Extremist White Supremacist Wet Dream is over. I know Bush and Cheney brought all you people out of the woodwork and gave you hope that your twisted dreams were coming true.
Nope - this is still America - I'm so very proud to say. And we're not electing the kooks this time.
September 4, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, they made some real inroads with the Senate majority leader tonight. I thought that was a great demonstration of bipartisan spirit.
September 4, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was weird. Reid "can't stand John McCain," and that's supposed to be a plus?
September 4, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain must've really been just seething at Reid to have her waste speech time like that. Half the people in this country probably know who Reid is, nor what the majority leader is.
September 4, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
oops. don't know who Reid is.
September 4, 2008 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew you are living a delusion. Look at the polls. They might move a point or two, but I don't know if the point or two is going to be up or down. However they move, they aren't going to move enough to help McCain. Obama is and remains in great shape. Snark is not going to bring him down. Too many people are just too determined.
For the Republicans to win they need a game changer. Tonight Palin proved she isn't that game changer.
September 4, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
And for your question:
Abortion? Life begins at conception. Any decision about abortion is a private, family matter. I have circumstances wherein I'd recommend or support.
Gays? No problem. But no to "marriage".
Environment? I'm a treehugger by most definitions.
Gun control? Any and every law abiding citizen should have the unfettered right to own and possess a gun regardless of where they live. I do support restrictions on military weapons and keeping guns out of the hands of felons and those who are impaired.
Health Care? I support Hillary's universal health care plan.
Early Childhood Education?! What's the point here?!
Matthew
http://www.theproblemwithobama.com
September 4, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
If those are your positions then the only person you can vote for is Obama (or maybe Nader.) Except for your position on guns both McCain and Palin hate you for your beliefs. I am not kidding when I use the word hate. If that isn't evident now you haven't been paying attention.
September 4, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
You never supported Clinton, you racist wingnut fuck.
September 4, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just checked out the boards on CNN and ABC out of curiosity and the speech is getting awful reviews. Lots of "snark, sarcastic, weak, mean pathetic, lacking substance, unimpressive, not ready for primetime". I was surprised by the number of commenters that found her unlikeable. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
I thought it made the Republican Party look very small, petty, and out of touch. So.... nothing new.
September 3, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is worse then Bush, folks. WORSE. I wouldn't underestimate her ability to turn this into an election about NOTHING.
The Obama campaign needs a stronger response than that.
And they need to present this ticket as worse than Bush/Cheney.
September 3, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNN is in love. I think that wanker with the beard just had his conemax at eleven on friday moment
September 4, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL.
September 4, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin was preaching to the choir not the voters. I cannot wait to for the next scandal to break, attack ads and the unleashing of Hillary Clinton. HRC is going to chew Palin up and spit that glamor girl out.
September 4, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
September 4, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope you are right, but I haven't seen any sign that Clinton is actually going to lift a finger in this campaign.
September 4, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we just let this roll off... they have one more day... the the it's all out until the convention.
The 'lying' is out of control though and needs to be slammed!!!!
September 4, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Purple State makes a good point here:
Sarah Barracuda--A Bit Too Vindictive?
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/sarah-barracudaa-bit-too-vindi-3.php
"Troopergate may have legs. This woman attacks her enemies. She's nasty. Vindictive. Look for people she's stepped on on the way up. They'll have good stories to tell."
September 4, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent observation.
Let's hope that is the case.
September 4, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's a good one. I think it can work well as an attack on Palin.
Also.... Bush mentioned "the angry left," but it was the angry right that was on full display tonight. Get some clips or Rudy, Romney, and Palin raging on tonight, and ask what they're so angry about when they've been in power for the last 8 years.
September 4, 2008 3:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
She is a snarling pit bull and she will lie, lie, lie like a rug and smile all the way.
We need to be wary of her because she is telegenic, and she is not afraid to draw blood.
But, she's still inherently weak. The few touches on foreign policy issues were so obviously written by somebody else and delivered so woodenly that it was almost painful. She's only good in her little element, and her element seems to be snide, snarling high school level politics.
I mean really, the way she dripped out "community organizer" was in the same tone as mean girls say "audio visual geek."
September 4, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we just let this roll off... they have one more day... the the it's all out until the convention.
The 'lying' is out of control though and needs to be slammed!!!! Enough!!!
September 4, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I seriously don't get how ANYBODY could have liked that speech. Smug, grating, tonally challenged, juvenile. I'm a lifelong Southerner, and she came across as the perfect embodiment of the loudmouthed trailer park lady who is proud of her ignorance. And contrary to popular opinion, those kind of people are NOT revered among the vast majority of small town residents (even in the South). Those kind of people annoy the shit out of almost everyone.
Maybe if we weren't coming off 8 years of W's shtick, it would fool enough low information voters to work. I really don't think this gambit will work - not this year. But maybe I just can't stand the thought of any chance that it could.
The MSM idiots like drama, so of course they liked it.
September 4, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Co-Sign!
September 4, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we just let this roll off... they have one more day... the the it's all out until the convention.
The 'lying' is out of control though and needs to be slammed!!!! Enough!!!
September 4, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
She only repeated the same crap the nuts on the right has been tried to shovel all year. Her problem, she gave Biden a target tomorow.
Since she was repeating the same crap, and gave no personal information IT IS ON!!!!!!
I am happy about her little "patent" speech, she will get her butt handed to her tomorrow....btw how convenient that she is or was going back to Alaska tomorow. But since Hollis French is waiting to depose her I think I heard she will be campaigning in FL this weekend.
September 4, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we just let this roll off... they have one more day... the the it's all out until the convention.
The 'lying' is out of control though and needs to be slammed!!!! Enough!!!
September 4, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
This was another epic fail, for heaven's sake.
Epic. Fail.
September 4, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
That speech reminded me of the Buchanan speech debacle at the 1992 GOP convention.
September 4, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, my mother 68 years old, called me saying she was great. I had it on tape delay and listened to her. She can't give a speech and she sucked, big time. However, I don't know how it will play, but she is really awful.
Gotta love the angry white male crowd, mostly old with comb overs. I still can't believe that this is happening in 21st century america. What happened to our country. It's so sad.
September 4, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Everything that McCains campaign is doing is a ripoff of H.W. Bushs 1992 campaign.
Back then it was Clinton media bias, not the recession of course, and the call to "annoy the media re-elect Bush". Is this campaign strategy McCain got from Bush Sr. while sitting in a golf cart in Maine?
Republicans are never to blame; it's always someone else.
September 4, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can't believe she dared to say the "thanks but no thanks" line again about the bridge to nowhere. It's been outed everywhere as a complete and total lie. They seem to have doubled down on the Rovian constantly repeat the lies strategy.
Sarah Palin. Liar Liar Hair's on Fire!
September 4, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Troll!
September 4, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm guessing you were lobbing this at Matthew Weaver?
September 4, 2008 7:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we all see this for what this is. Palin is the attack dog. When BO or JB attacks her, the Repubs cry sexism.
Its a trap. BO will focus their aim at JM and probably will use Hillary or some other female surrogates to go after Palin if they have to respond to her.
Tonight was a punch in the gut, but we have to trust the BO team. They knew this was coming.
September 4, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not so sure about that. She's framed herself as tough. If they aren't tough enough to come right back at her, they'll look like wimps.
September 4, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did they? What did they know about Palin that we didn't?
I honestly don't think Obama expected this.
Not to say he should be worried. The man has ice in his veins. They just got to size up what they are up against.
September 4, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do trust the Obama campaign.
I can't remember how many traps this makes now I've read about that were sure to get Obama if he didn't do it just right.
So far I haven't seen him trapped. Not once.
September 4, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
This line on Daily Kos is the best:
Why are the Republicans so pissed off at everything? They're the ones who fucked up this country.
That's a bumper sticker in the making...
September 4, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Love it. Thanks!
September 4, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Am i the only one? What i saw tonight was a slap on every Americans that volunteer their service to serve the communities.
For the first time in my life, i witnessed GOP ridicule service to the less fortunate among us. Palin and Guliani thinks volunteering to serve people that are less fortunate is not service to our country.
This is an insult to every young Americans that volunteer for peace corp., Veteran's home, inner city and indian reservation. Well, the GOPs actually believe this people are not important.
September 4, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are so correct here...I feel this is a great response to the shit we heard tonight!
September 4, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's also an insult to the Catholic Church whose charity organizations funded the work Obama did.
September 4, 2008 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Am i the only one? What i saw tonight was a slap on every Americans that volunteer their service to serve the communities.
For the first time in my life, i witnessed GOP ridicule service to the less fortunate among us. Palin and Guliani thinks volunteering to serve people that are less fortunate is not service to our country.
This is an insult to every young Americans that volunteer for peace corp., Veteran's home, inner city and indian reservation. Well, the GOPs actually believe this people are not important.
September 4, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
A guy from an Anchorage newspaper today was saying that one of Palin's character flaws is that she is "brittle". She cracks easy and lashes out - thus all the firings and loyalty oaths while Mayor/Governor.
Time to take a bat to that glass jaw.
September 4, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like a perfect fit for McCranky.
September 4, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ruh-roh:
Palin denies affair rumours
* Anne Davies
* September 4, 2008 - 1:04PM
The McCain campaign has vigorously denied reports that Republican vice-presidential pick Sarah Palin had a steamy extramarital affair with her husband's business partner.
The story, which appeared just hours before Mrs Palin was due to address the Republican convention today, was branded "scurrilous" by McCain chief strategist Steve Schmidt, who said it was "a vicious lie".
"The smearing of the Palin family must end," he said.
"The allegations contained on the cover of the National Enquirer insinuating that Governor Palin had an extramarital affair are categorically false. It is a vicious lie. "
http://www.theage.com.au/world/palin-denies-affair-rumours-20080904-49cv.html
September 4, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I was watching Palin, it suddenly came to me: Palin is the ultimate Republican "mean girl." She has that popular, cheerleader, bitchiness down to an art form. Her condescension and belittling of Obama after he has been very gracious to Palin is truly offensive.
Palin for Mean Girl!
Question 1: Is it sexist to point this out? I hope not, I would hate to have to turn in my Women's Studies minor.
Question 2: Is the sarcasm and belittling aimed at Obama a form of racist dog whistle? It sure seems like it to me.
September 4, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
In reply to question #1: Andy Sullivan has her pegged as Tracy Flick from Election. And yes, it is sexist to point this out. (Oops.)
Question #2: Yes, when Giuliani turned "only in America" into a laugh line it was vulgar racism. They want to define Barack as an affirmative-action candidate.
Made me want to ***************************** [The blog owners have deleted this commenter's violent fantasy. We wish to remind all participants that threats involving napalm are inappropriate on this blog.]
September 4, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why is it sexist? I don't see that and I have a sex.
September 4, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Besides, she is Tracy Flick.
September 4, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, Tracy Flick was somewhat informed.
September 4, 2008 3:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, now weren't you also the one with the great line about Palin thinking Fareed Zakaria was one of the 9/11 attackers? If so, please don't ever leave these comments sections! :)
September 4, 2008 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there any commentator more full of shit than Campbell Brown?
she went after the Repubs once, they bit back.
She'll be eating out of their hand the rest of the way.
September 4, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK. I was not impressed at all. But can you tell me what about the MSM? Sorry, I know I should check myself, but it's too much to watch Palin's speech and then those MSM guys in a row...
All I'm praying is the Obama camp will hit back quick, hard, and strong. Her speech was full of crap and should not be too difficult to attack.
September 4, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
She has the snarl of a pit bull, too. Her right lip curled every time she emphasized a point.
The U.S. is in trouble when a major political party can seriously nominate such a person for VP.
September 4, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
September 4, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
You said it.
September 4, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
At times Palin reminded me of a stand-up comedian delivering nothing but one liners. Also notable was that her mockery was based on falsehoods. But then again she's a Republican.
September 4, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Also notable was that her mockery was based on falsehoods"
As was true for Romney's and Rudy's speeches. Huckabee, to his credit, avoided their degree of nastiness.
September 4, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
"One liners" are exactly right.
The said one-liners were vindictive and based on false premises. But I guess if the Republican campaign has nothing substantive to hang their hat on they figured they might as well get sarcastic and nasty. If McCain and Palin can pull of pinning the label of "reformers" on themselves, then it will be a penultimate moment of media irresponsibility and citizen ignorance.
September 4, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans have decided to just put it all on cynicism, and are just going to go down swinging. My father in law, a lifelong Republican, and a Financial Analyst, switched to Obama today, as a result of sheer silliness of the Palin selection. This doesn't mean much, he is a pretty liberal guy from New Jersey, but still voted for Bush twice. The 10% of undecideds like my father in law aren't right wing idealogues. I really have to believe this thing is over. 60 more days of Palin-tainment should seal the deal. You're right, if we lose this one, America has gone over the edge.
September 4, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not time to give up on the Republic yet!
September 4, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
All sizzle, no substance. Here's my preliminary list of words and phrases we didn't hear from Governor Palin tonight:
Affordable
Health
Care
Insurance
Savings
College
Schools
Mortgage
Foreclosure
Food prices
Inflation
Poor
Poverty
Overseas
Growth
Development
Middle
Class
Global
Climate
Warming
Afghanistan
Veterans
Benefits
Bipartisan
Pretty obvious that the election isn't about issues for the McCain/Palin ticket.
September 4, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
((((((( Standing O, Standing O!))))))
Great job!
September 4, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well Said! we can write off the middle class/poor white evangelicals who live for this crap, but if the momentum continues for Obama, even warming up the base won't help. The economical situation is just too hard; the young folks are totally engaged.
NO Way No How NO McCain!
September 4, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I was watching Palin, it suddenly came to me: Palin is the ultimate Republican "mean girl." She has that popular, cheerleader, bitchiness down to an art form. Her condescension and belittling of Obama after he has been very gracious to Palin is truly offensive.
Palin for Mean Girl!
Question 1: Is it sexist to point this out? I hope not, I would hate to have to turn in my Women's Studies minor.
Question 2: Is the sarcasm and belittling aimed at Obama a form of racist dog whistle? It sure seems like it to me.
September 4, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
The other tactic they're using here is having the girl beat up on Obama. Is he going to be beat up by a girl? That's the other thing at work here and I'm not sure how he handles it but he can't be seen to be backing down.
September 4, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hate to say this, but he needs to chuckle at it, like your sexist uncle would, and imply (without actually saying it) "she's a feisty little thing."
September 4, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
After hearing her speech I realized that the McCain campaign has no plans to elevate Sarah - they are not going to give her anything of substance to say. They are packaging her as the embodiment of the small town zenophobic catty bitch.
September 4, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign needs to come back against the Palin speech on specifics. She claimed that Obama wrote two books but no laws (now in NYT article). That claim has to be refuted before it gets accepted in the conventional wisdom. She claimed that she opposed the bridge to nowhere, but she was first for it.
These rebuttals are easily documented, and their purpose is to establish that Palin cannot be trusted in what she says. This distrust will resonate with the other scandals brewing against her.
September 4, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I was watching Palin, it suddenly came to me: Palin is the ultimate Republican "mean girl." She has that popular, cheerleader, bitchiness down to an art form. Her condescension and belittling of Obama after he has been very gracious to Palin is truly offensive.
Palin for Mean Girl!
Question 1: Is it sexist to point this out? I hope not, I would hate to have to turn in my Women's Studies minor.
Question 2: Is the sarcasm and belittling aimed at Obama a form of racist dog whistle? It sure seems like it to me.
September 4, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I was watching Palin, it suddenly came to me: Palin is the ultimate Republican "mean girl." She has that popular, cheerleader, bitchiness down to an art form. Her condescension and belittling of Obama after he has been very gracious to Palin is truly offensive.
Palin for Mean Girl!
Question 1: Is it sexist to point this out? I hope not, I would hate to have to turn in my Women's Studies minor.
Question 2: Is the sarcasm and belittling aimed at Obama a form of racist dog whistle? It sure seems like it to me.
September 4, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, I needed that. I've had a sick feeling ever since Romney took the stage and had to leave the room during Pain's speech.
Since I'm a lefty, I never know when my take on things coincides with middle America. Glad to hear the NewsHour wasn't buying.
September 4, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign needs to come back against the Palin speech on specifics. She claimed that Obama wrote two books but no laws (now in NYT article). That claim has to be refuted before it gets accepted in the conventional wisdom. She claimed that she opposed the bridge to nowhere, but she was first for it.
These rebuttals are easily documented, and their purpose is to establish that Palin cannot be trusted in what she says. This distrust will resonate with the other scandals brewing against her.
September 4, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
So Buchanan's answer to this problem is to never let Sarah Palin near the press. Ever. For any reason.
September 4, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are a liar and a scoundrel. If you really believed in Clinton, Obama would be your pick. She told you so. What more do you need? I thought you believed in her SO MUCH. Troll.
September 4, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm pretty grossed out at the very generous read Greg has given this woman.
She was shrill, sarcastic, and very proud of herself. The tone was appalling and truly not going to play in Scranton, no matter what the stupid pundits say (as they try to appear "fair" which is really just their "fear" of reality showing through).
I heard many lies. Many.
I heard no new ideas.
There was no love of America, and absolutely no humilty.
This is not where America is now. Progressives know this. This is not America 2008.
Let's stand up and call this crap out for what it is: useless angry lies wrapped in a flag.
September 4, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aye, 'twas a righteous call for us to all Patriotically go fuck ourselves.
September 4, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's exactly how she came across to me too. In Greg's defense, though, he said "we highly doubt that it'll be received this way." And sounds like he is right in that light -- I have no gas left in my tank to watch the MSM after that speech, but from people's posts apparently there is the media love fest of Palin going on.
September 4, 2008 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oo - she was very proud of herself, indeed.
Seriously - what is sexist about comparing a woman to a character in a movie, if she fits? I don't get that.
Just cause the character is a bitch - well that's the point. Not sexist - just a fact.
September 4, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Spiro Agnew with lipstick.
September 4, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
No matter how you put the lipstick on the pig, she's still just a pig with lipstick.
September 4, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
partisan, hateful, snide, and sarcastic. pretty disgusting.
September 4, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do think they are trying to set a trap with Palin. They want to see if they can "get to" Obama. I don't think they will.
I suspect we will hear very little from Obama about Palin, other than some Obamaesque words like "disappointed", "American people deserve better", "divisive", etc.
McCain's people know this election is about change. With Palin they are trying to bait the Obama people into a debate about experience (which the media, at least, has largely obliged). If successful they can change the subject while blabbering on and on about how they are "reformers".
Ironically, Obama has never made the argument that this election is about experience, and he has not belittled Palin's experience.
That is not his message. He must (and will) stick to "change" and he can not allow McCain/Palin to make headway on the "reform" message.
September 4, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope the Obama Campaign does not settle for Palin's belittling of everyone in America who was not born with the advantages that she and McCain have. The Republicans have declared an unofficial war on everyone who is not like them. There is no reason for the Democrats to turn the other cheek and pretend they did not hear this. As another commenter said above, we Democrats will look weak if we do not fight back.
September 4, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Relax folks this isnt a game changer. It was red meat for lots and lots of delusional white shitwipes that have never set foot anywhere near a small town. Small towns with families struggling to survive who care little about partisan shit and more about what the hell are you going to do make life better. Rural voters?
Please the day voters in rural WV, Ohio and PA rush to vote for a black man America will have truly arrived. She needed to claim the middle ground for Mcinsane and this was not even close. The simple rejoinder to this is more of the same aka wheres the beef?
Mcinsane has a massive task tomorrow and the endless spiel of POW POW POW will not suffice. It didnt work for Kerry, Dole or Bush I. If he delivers his normal speech "hockey sham mom" wont save a graceless bitter old man.
September 4, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. The speech will be initially judged on its delivery, and that delivery was very strong.
Sarah Palin came across as a winner pure and simple.
Uncommitted people support a winner.
Last week Obama demonstrated that he was a winner. He needs to keep on with those demonstrations. They need to sap Palin/McCain with an endless drip drip in the background. There's a lot going wrong in the Palin world. Bring that to the fore.
September 4, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's just nonsense.
No she didn't.
September 4, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought mocking the community organizer stuff was a real mistake tonight. Even trying to be dispassionate and look at it as a Republican strategist, I just don't see how that plays well. You're not ridiculing taxpayer-funded social programs there. You're ridiculing charity, service, kindness, and (by extension) philanthropy, which has always been the conservative and sometimes independent alternative to taxpayer-funded social programs.
This is the work that churches, black and white, take great pride in. They know full well what community organizer means, even if the MSM is too out of touch to get it. And Obama mentions the closing steel plant every time he discusses that work, tying it to the economy and job loss.
September 4, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not just that the Republican's merely argued that community service is inadequate preparation for the presidency (which is true if that's the only experience one had) it's how Guilliani paused to let the vitriol fully foment. It was disgusting, hateful, and should be a disappointment to any citizen. No, it should piss Americans off.
September 4, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, Sarah Palin isn't tough, she's a Mean Girl.
I just hope she doesn't connect to middle America like W could. Just what we need, another election about by beer, bowling and bbq rather than who can actually run the country.
As an aside, regarding the Enquirer affair story - I wouldn't touch that one. Let the Enquirer go after it but who knows if Rove is bugging his own office with some of this stuff.
September 4, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Look - for heaven's sake, please - the last 8 years is exactly why she is going to flop spectacularly with everyone except the batshit insane who are left of the Repug base.
Isn't the entire country fed up and suffering from a serious hangover from that beer they decided to have with Commander Coo Coo Bananas? Isn't his approval a record low?
What makes anyone think that voters want another completely inexperienced Hee Haw idiot in the White House? After what we've been through?
Do y'all think that people really will do that?
No they won't. No they absolutely will not.
September 4, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
As noted by many tonight, this is a new low. America deserves to crumble if we elect Gramps and his lipsticked Pitbull.
This rank amateur, who clearly has never uttered the words Saudi Arabia or Iran before, is now the #1 surrogate for John McCain and the Republican party's Presidential bid.
Just unbelieveably scary.
That woman snarls at end of every sentence, for goodness sakes.
September 4, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Names you didn't hear: Bush, Cheney ... Rudy
Word surprisingly heard: torture (the unmitigated gall to mention that after the last 8 years)
September 4, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs a woman to go after Palin. I'm thinking Senator Barbara Mikulski, from Maryland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Mikulski
She's working class, feisty and had been in the House for ten years, before she became a Senator in 1989. She embodies experience, hard work, dedication and toughness. Perfect against Palin.
September 4, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why not Hillary? Put the real deal up next to the brittle, scripted sham?
September 4, 2008 1:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
He doesn't need anyone to go after her. He can take her on himself, on the issues. And other than that, she'd headed for sefl-destruction all by herself.
If they wanted a woman who's supposed to be running on likeability, they've should've picked someone who's likeable. And this one isn't.
September 4, 2008 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who watched Sarah Palin last Friday would not have been the least bit surprised by her accomplished and very effective delivery. A lot of people outside that room are going to find her very appealing. The Obama campaign has got to do more - a lot more - than simply repeat the "voted with Bush 90% of the time" mantra. They've got to be specific and hardhitting, without getting personal.
September 4, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
True.
The problem with Sarah Palin, is that she is so easily underestimated. After all, how could the former mayor from Wasilly, Alaska, be a problem? But that's the worst mistake Obama could make.
It's easy to see why she's nicknamed "Barracuda". Very sharp teeth on that one.
September 4, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I totally beg to differ.
Americans are not stupid enough to repeat their mistake.
September 4, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hope you're right, but I have a very bad feeling about this. The media will probably back off from doing negative Sarah stories, from now on, unless something jumps out that is too big to let pass.
She did well enough, in the sense that she didn't flub her lines. That's what they were looking for.
September 4, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
O come on -
God - you know Obama stands up there and takes back our pride and one fucking lousy week later, just because McLame freaked out and chose the single worst VEEP choice ever, y'all have bad feelings?
I"m going to bed - in my opinion, this couldn't be sillier. The Repugs have sold themselves for 8 years as the Party Who Will Keep You Safe.
Sarah Palin? Really? Y'all are worried about a high school level mean girl?
Good night.
September 4, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
O bull shit.
A lot of people will laugh their asses off at the whole idea.
September 4, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
As one who laughed their ass off at the idea of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush being elected, I never take anything for granted.
September 4, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe that she is the perfect delivery method for the Rove campaign of McShame. She will say anything they put in front of her. Rove has his girl to be the meanest attack dog ever. As she said tonight a pitbull with lipstick. The Culture War of 2008 has started. Choose your sides and be prepared for the fight! Somehow I feel no real warmth in her family. Her style and attitude is so hostile and shows no deep understandings of worldly ways. A leader of the free world??
September 4, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more name you didn't hear: Mary Matalin.
But that would have been immodest. I'd bet a lot of money that she wrote about 85% of that speech.
September 4, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the look of things, she probably coached the speaker, too.
September 4, 2008 3:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
So Sarah Palin, who obviously had never uttered the words Saudi Arabia, Iran or preconditions before tonight, is now the number one surrogate for John McCain, and the Republican bid to retain the Presidency.....
bwwwwaaaaahahahaahhahahaha!!!!!!!
September 4, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
And speaking of lack of experience, since McCain has never been a mayor nor a governor he must have less "executive" experience than Palin.
And exactly what king of fine distinction were the Republicans trying to make by qualifying "experience" with "executive"?
September 4, 2008 1:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin's excellent speech delivery and bullseye swipes at Obama show her to be a formidable force. She's got guts, she's tough, she's out to win or die.
Now it's in Obama's court.
September 4, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's utterly ridiculous. She's boring and petty.
But then again, I guess some some people like boring. Maybe it makes them feel comfortable with themselves.
September 4, 2008 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Roland Martin (CNN) is pissed...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGWthR7vdfI
September 4, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Go, Roland!!!!!
September 4, 2008 1:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Roland rocks,
September 4, 2008 4:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hope you're right, but I have a bad feeling about this. The media will probably back off from doing negative Sarah stories, from now on, unless something jumps out that is too big to let pass.
She did well enough, in the sense that she didn't flub her lines. That's what they were looking for.
September 4, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Joe Klein of Time is hopping mad. There is no universal press wavering that I can see.
September 4, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do not believe this.
Just one week ago, Obama stood up and gave us back our pride.
One week later y'all are scared of Sarah Palin.
For 8 years the Repugs sold themselves as the Party Who Will Keep America Safe. That's right out the window.
Sarah Palin - y'all are worried about a junior high mean queen?
I'm going to bed. This couldn't be sillier.
Good night.
September 4, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, they're worried that America is a land of subnormal mental defectives who might vote for a Hooters waitress for vice president. They're quite right to worry.
September 4, 2008 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Totally agree -- watching Gergen and Eugene Robinson carefully stare at each word as they enunciated it. And Rachael M and Robinson snuck in some nice juicy FACTS (about the Jews for Jesus minister, Bridge to Nowhere farce, a couple of other things). I'd rather they speak mildly and get those seeds of doubt planted in an audience that (for the most part) would just tune out if they said what they really thought.
September 4, 2008 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Laugh at her. Nothing infuriates a "mean girl" more than laughing at her. My god she was channelling Tina Fey's movie.
September 4, 2008 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
This night should come back to haunt them over and over. The campaign should remind America, over and over, that the Republicans, and Mrs. Palin in particular, sneered, and then guffawed, at service to the community. It will horrify any voter who understands that while Mr. McCain's sacrifice as a POW is worthy of respect we cannot sustain ourselves on military service (were it so, we would be in hog heaven after five years of war), and can ill afford to turn down the commitment of those who serve peaceably. Also, if we play the soundtrack over and over that the Republicans laughed at the notion of Obama's community organizing, Americans will distinguish the dog-whistle for what it is: community organizing is not serious, it is make work for (and troublemaking by) lazy and uppity black people paid for by taxpayer money.
September 4, 2008 2:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know this is a pretty liberal blog. Most of the people here are bound to be pissed by Palin's pitbull performance. You don't get much of a feel for how the general public views the speech. Oh there are a few paid trolls, but they are easily identified by their talking points.
Anyway I went over to CNN and read the comments. They read exactly like the comments here except they have a lot of folks who call themselves independents. If the comments at CNN are any indication Pit Bull Palin screwed the pooch. The speech is going over like a lead balloon with everybody but the angry right. I anticipate a dead cat convention bounce unless McCain gives the speech of his life. I don't see that happening. He hired Karl Rove's speech writers.
This election isn't in the bag, we still have a lot to do, but I am going to sleep well tonight.
September 4, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. I sure hope those comments are legit. It did make me feel better.
September 4, 2008 2:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is the distinct smell of fear and desperation on this thread too.
There's much about the Republicans that scare me. But Palin was a hit tonight. She was funny and brutal, a sure-fire winning combination. She did a killer delivery and came off as real, totally relatable.
I'm telling you, if she does well in the debate with Biden, McCain is going to win.
September 4, 2008 1:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
and then die, leaving us with president mooseturd...
America is a joke that's no longer funny
September 4, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
What remains to be seen is whether the major MSM (CNN, NBC/MSNBC CBS ABC) will kowtow as result of being identified as the enemy? They now must worry about ratings and of course, organized criticism.
My worry is that given the fact Palin has used her gender to hide behind, major MSM will want to avoid scorn or being accused of sexism and not perform their function of completing her vetting and reporting the facts.
September 4, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
As noted by many tonight, this is a new low. America deserves to crumble if we elect Gramps and his lipsticked Pitbull.
Just unbelieveably scary.
That woman snarls at end of every sentence, for goodness sakes.
September 4, 2008 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just chuckle and say, well, yes, her HIGH SCHOOL name is Sarah Barracuda. Frame the mean girl where she belongs.
Oh, yes, someone just compared her to a candidate for student council.
September 4, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Personally I find her to be an absolute insult to Pitbulls. Most are NOT mean, it is the owner/handler who is responsible for some pitbulls aggressive behavior. They have a bad rap because of morons like Palin. Bleh!
AND as a once Hillary 50 something white female supporter, who now supports Obama, I did not sit behind Archibald Cox at the Roe V Wade hearings to turn around and vote for some looney Hockey Mom, who I suspect is on Prozac like the rest of them.
We supported Hillary for a reason and for those same reasons we are supporting Obama.
September 4, 2008 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did anybody else notice that Palin described McCain’s experiences as a POW as being “torturous experiences” rather than “torture”?
September 4, 2008 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Geez...what a shrill, arrogant, loudmouth B-I-T-C-H. You would think a dame who just catapulted from the PTA to possibly the second highest office in the land, would show some degree of humility and respect for the office. Some class. Or is that too much to hope for from a Republican?
September 4, 2008 1:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen, rstephen.
September 4, 2008 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
As an antidote to tonight's speech, watch Joe Biden give his acceptance speech. What a diff!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVH58DeUThg
September 4, 2008 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did anyone else wonder what was the basis of Palin's emphatic support of McCain's policies and character?
September 4, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is that Pretty Girl in High School that always made you feel bad about yourself. Of course you wouldn't see it. You're a guy. But the reason her nickname was Barracuda was because she's a Mean Girl. I'm not worried anymore. The more Republican women get to know her, the less they'll like her.
September 4, 2008 1:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
With his blue collar backgound, Chris Matthews clearly realizes what Obama is up against now. He looked completely beaten down at the end of tonight's MSNBC coverage.
Palin's speech was a 10, plus the family optics were incredible (especially Willow smoothing baby Trig's hair).
An epic general election campaign has been launched.
September 4, 2008 2:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing beaten down are the balls of Palin's hubby. Imagine being married to a shrew like that? Now I see why her daughter got knocked up. It's the fastest and easiest way to escape the old witch.
September 4, 2008 2:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
..a "10" if you are retarded, and covet that number.
September 4, 2008 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, exactly. That's one of the key points Obama should hit them about hard, strongly, and effectively.
And as caromass pointed out, there was NOTHING, literally nothing, in her speech about education, health care, job loss, wage decline, mortgage crisis, equal pay for equal work, etc. Instead there were a LOT of lies. This very fact should be brought up again and again.
September 4, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meantime, the AP has termed her debut a "star turn"
and
The U.S. has confirmed ground assault against the Taliban inside Pakistan.
Yup. Yup. Sara's just who we need a heartbeat away from the presidency in times like these. Yup yup. Anybody who can get a bunch of rabid white republicans on their feet cheering at the way she can jab at the black guy obviously could handle this kind of situation too.
Gotta be crazy not to see that, right? I mean, she can take a "starturn." Like, what else does the country need?
September 4, 2008 2:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin = Ann Coulter in wig & glasses
September 4, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well that was an exercise in nastiness. The whole evening was nasty, but Sarah Palin was the cherry of suck on the sundae of douchhery.
I don't know how well this will play for middle America or Independents. I think that it won't play as well for them as it did for the parts of the MSM that were slobbering all over her. I think that she exceeded the expectations of being able to string words together. The typical thing they would do for Dubya. If he didn't drool, he won.
But I think the words will be seen as too red meat, Independents tend to like their Constituion, thank you very much. Not have it mocked. And that bitchy tone? I don't think will play well with some older types who won't be impressed with her grasp on issues and will now probably think her a bitch. Something which we will agree after tonight. Mocking community organizers? Eesh. I hope that Obama breaks out the church card in fighting back on that one. I mean, unless the Republicans are saying they're against churches working to help people in need? That'll be serving them with their own sauce.
September 4, 2008 2:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Man, sometimes I wonder if dems have any institutional memory.
Bush - when he was running against McCain and Gore eight years ago, used the same 'executive experience' line. Straight from Rove. Remember how he said he was 'the decider'?
A perfect way to answer this is the following ad:
Voiceover: John McCain says Sarah Palin is qualified to be President because she has 'executive experience'. (Show a clip of McCain saying that).
"Hmmm, sounds familiar."
Then show a clip of Bush using the same line (there is about 1000 clips you can use).
Tag line: Flash "McCain/Palin" ... Flash "More of the same".
And pull the debates between Bush and McCain - I bet McCain got off a good line on the 'executive experience' at Bush's expense.
September 4, 2008 2:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Man, sometimes I wonder if dems have any institutional memory.
Bush - when he was running against McCain and Gore eight years ago, used the same 'executive experience' line. Straight from Rove. Remember how he said he was 'the decider'?
A perfect way to answer this is the following ad:
Voiceover: John McCain says Sarah Palin is qualified to be President because she has 'executive experience'. (Show a clip of McCain saying that).
"Hmmm, sounds familiar."
Then show a clip of Bush using the same line (there is about 1000 clips you can use).
Tag line: Flash "McCain/Palin" ... Flash "More of the same".
And pull the debates between Bush and McCain - I bet McCain got off a good line on the 'executive experience' at Bush's expense.
September 4, 2008 2:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Man, sometimes I wonder if dems have any institutional memory.
Bush - when he was running against McCain and Gore eight years ago, used the same 'executive experience' line. Straight from Rove. Remember how he said he was 'the decider'?
A perfect way to answer this is the following ad:
Voiceover: John McCain says Sarah Palin is qualified to be President because she has 'executive experience'. (Show a clip of McCain saying that).
"Hmmm, sounds familiar."
Then show a clip of Bush using the same line (there is about 1000 clips you can use).
Tag line: Flash "McCain/Palin" ... Flash "More of the same".
And pull the debates between Bush and McCain - I bet McCain got off a good line on the 'executive experience' at Bush's expense.
September 4, 2008 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manger, justsent this out as part of a fundraising letter, as a response to Sarah Palin's speech.
"Both Rudy Giuliani and Sarah Palin specifically mocked Barack's experience as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago more than two decades ago, where he worked with people who had lost jobs and been left behind when the local steel plants closed.
Let's clarify something for them right now.
Community organizing is how ordinary people respond to out-of-touch politicians and their failed policies.
And it's no surprise that, after eight years of George Bush, millions of people have found that by coming together in their local communities they can change the course of history. That promise is what our campaign has been about from the beginning."
September 4, 2008 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lovely.