Obama Campaign Hits McCain Adviser's Ties To Mortgage Giants
The Obama campaign is going after McCain over a story in today's New York Times reporting that McCain campaign manager Rick Davis took a staggering $30,000 a month for five years as the head of a group set up by Fannie and Freddie to defend them against stricter government regulations.
The Obama campaign's broadside came in response to a McCain ad released this morning tying Obama to the Rezko mess. From Obama campaign spokesperson Bill Burton:
"It's no coincidence that on the very day newspapers reported that John McCain's campaign manager was paid $2 million to lobby against tighter regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the McCain campaign would launch this false, gratuitous attack. Barack Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate as an independent Democrat. He took on the Chicago Democratic organization in a primary to win a seat in the US Senate. And in both Illinois and Washington, he has challenged the Old Guard for landmark ethics reforms."
In the current environment, the Times story should be an important one by any measure. In one particularly choice nugget, a former Fannie exec explains why currying favor with Davis was seen as so valuable to the mortgage giants:
"The value that he brought to the relationship was the closeness to Senator McCain and the possibility that Senator McCain was going to run for president again," said Robert McCarson, a former spokesman for Fannie Mae, who said that while he worked there from 2000 to 2002, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac together paid Mr. Davis's firm $35,000 a month. Mr. Davis "didn't really do anything," Mr. McCarson, a Democrat, said.
So according to this exec, it was worth it to Fannie, in its quest to fend off regulatory oversight, to pay tens of thousands of dollars a month to Davis simply because of the possibility that McCain would become president.















Here's the money quote from Davis:
“You can say what you want about free-market distortions, but people like the system because it gets them into houses cheap,” Mr. Davis said to Institutional Investor magazine in 2000, adding that he would run the advocacy group out of his Alexandria, Va., lobbying firm.
Un. Real.
Pufferfish
September 22, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
"In 2007, Wall Street's five biggest firms-- Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley - paid a record $39 billion in bonuses to themselves." ABC's Political Punch -- I say no Bail Out!
AND
Senator John McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis, was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to defend them against stricter regulations!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/us/politics/2...
More McCain Hyprocrisy, When you hear McCain speak, see: Wizard of Oz
September 22, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
This story is becoming pornographic as we find out the extent of the orgy these guys had in bed with each other!
September 22, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Turned that thought into a blog:
Pornography at the Highest Levels
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/pornography-at-the-highest-lev.php
September 22, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just keep hammering this. Push through the noise and distraction the McCain camp is throwing up. Keep pushing.
September 22, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
As long as the issue is the economy, Obama beats McCain handily.
I don't see how McCain can even rebut any argument by the Obama campaign. They're left speechless.
http://thepajamapundit.com/
September 22, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I understand this bailout, it just attempts to put the investment banks back in the same position they were in before the bottom fell out.
In other words - we're going to pay to make them whole, no matter what it does to us, the people? We lose no matter what?
That's how I see this - we lose the money invested that was lost as well as the bailout money to make the investment companies whole so we pay twice? What we lost and what we give them?
This is insane.
September 22, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, that about sums it up. As it stands now (that is, as proposed by Secretary Paulson), there is no downside for the financial firms participating in the program.
That may be why they're lining up to feed at the trough already!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/business/22lobby.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin
Dean Baker linked to this NYT article over on the Cafe'.
The program needs to exact a pound of flesh from any firm who sells assets to the government. It must be seen as a last resort for them, not a big giveaway.
-- ARG
September 22, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
INSANITY! And perversity!
September 22, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Keep in mind, per the front page story here today, "investment banks" as we have come to know and love them over the past 100+ plus years are now dinosaurs, as in extinct.
It is those investment banks that have been the primary beneficiaries of the banking deregulation, as they had been able to concoct the most obscure and obtuse financial instruments in history in order to extract a disproportionate share of wealth from our modestly growing economy.
I have mixed feelings about this bailout, but one thing I know for sure is that things aren't going back to the way they were before.
September 22, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain: Truly Born, Formed and Waiting Around to Die from Corruption
September 22, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Buy, this story just gets better and better.
September 22, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, as long as you haven't lost your house, your retirement money, your life savings - this really isn't good news for Americans.
September 22, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
True.
Obviously I mean from the "narrative" standpoint. McCain has no ground to stand on here.
In fact, it is amazing that he even opened this can of worms with his attack on Obama over his Raines relationship (or lack of relationship it turns out.)
Obama is doing a good job hammering this message so far, but at the end of the day if not every single semi-conscious American doesn't see that McCain and his people are PART OF THE PROBLEM, then Obama is not doing enough. They are just too deep in the muck to come out looking clean.
September 22, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I understand this bailout, it just attempts to put the investment banks back in the same position they were in before the bottom fell out.
In other words - we're going to pay to make them whole, no matter what it does to us, the people? We lose no matter what?
That's how I see this - we lose the money invested that was lost as well as the bailout money to make the investment companies whole so we pay twice? What we lost and what we give them?
This is insane.
September 22, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I understand this bailout, it just attempts to put the investment banks back in the same position they were in before the bottom fell out.
In other words - we're going to pay to make them whole, no matter what it does to us, the people? We lose no matter what?
That's how I see this - we lose the money invested that was lost as well as the bailout money to make the investment companies whole so we pay twice? What we lost and what we give them?
This is insane.
September 22, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you dare post twice!! I don't care *HOW* many times you may have complained about the busted server! This dual submission is intolerable, period!
Yours very kindly,
Kl. Barbie
September 22, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's statement from May 2006
http://www.govtrack.us/co...0525-16&bill=s109-190
September 22, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
And Obama proposed legislation on 2 separate occasions (Feb 2006 and April 2007) to curb mortgage fraud.
Clearly, McCain wants to put this entire crisis at the feet of Freddie and Fannie. Unfortunately for him, no economist agrees that they are the root of the problem. This is a much more complex problem that that, and even if Freddie and Fannie were no longer GSEs (which is all that this McCain bill proposes), we would still be involved in a bailout today. We would just be bailing out Freddie and Fannie as *private* companies, like AIG and Bear Stearns, rather than as GSEs. Regardless of how they are classified, the government can't allow Freddie and Fannie to fail, given the sheer percentage of American mortgages they are involved in. Plus, if they were non-GSEs, it would be that much more difficult to add regulations to them and try to curb their monopoly on MBSs.
It's also worth noting that McCain was pushing this bill in 2005 when Republicans had the majority and held the White House.
September 22, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
So:
McCain proposed changes over a year before whatever Obama supposed legislation (let's have a link).
Check the date: May 25, 2006. the legislation was crafted in 2005 but was not up for vote until May 2006.
Democrats killed it.
democrats are responsible for the mess. Between Clinton's deregulation and killing McCain's legislation there is little question who really bears actual responsibility.
Fixing this was a legislative matter. The Dems have been in power for two years and killed corrective bills and allowed the problem to explode.
September 22, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I understand this bailout, it just attempts to put the investment banks back in the same position they were in before the bottom fell out.
In other words - we're going to pay to make them whole, no matter what it does to us, the people? We lose no matter what?
That's how I see this - we lose the money invested that was lost as well as the bailout money to make the investment companies whole so we pay twice? What we lost and what we give them?
This is insane.
September 22, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ram Rick Davis down McShame's throat.
And while we're at it, ram Phil Gramm and bailing out UBS down McShame's throat, too.
September 22, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry - this new server is working just great.
I didn't mean to post 3 times.
September 22, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Harrumph!!
Very respectfully,
Moose Queen
September 22, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dear concerned citizens of America and Mass Media of the U.S.A.
As a concerned registered independent voter, forensic psychiatrist, disabled American I made my decision to vote after taking into consideration following joint tickets attributes and characteristics.
1. Has the ticket shown adequate calmness, coolness, and connectedness's under pressure to lead our nation [Presidential Temperament]?
2. Has the ticket shown sustained sound "Judgment and Caliber"?
3. Has the ticket shown adequate understanding of depth and degree to address the crucial challenges in their their purpose, policies, and positions [ Honesty, integrity and sincerity]?
4. Has the ticket sufficient "understanding and knowledge" of inside Washington workings [Experience]"?
5. Has the ticket reservoir resilience, wisdom, and vigor to address the present and future f our beloved "Great-grand Nation"?
6. Has the ticket enough joint foreign policy experience and exposure based on " Values, Virtues, Vastness, and " [American moral soul]"?
7. Has their campaign talk, slogans, ads, plans, and programs based on facts and are they free of fear, fiction, frivolous labels, unfair attacks, negativity, and impulsively? [No "imminent danger to national
security and safety"].
8. Has the ticket genuinely kept on message of country first and politics last and avoided copying [Message change"]?
9.Has the ticket message stayed away from Culture divide and war[ Disaster prevention ]?
10. Has the ticket resisted being surrounded, supported and surrogate's by divisiveness, distortion's, and destructive characters, [ Real patriotism VS shiftiness and shameless parrot-ism]?
11. Has the ticket thoughtful, real non-partisan, & non-impulsive plans to address our current economic crisis or political tactics and temperamental statements.
I have personally and professionally concluded that OBAMA-BIDEN ticket will lift and inspire our greatgrand nation back to its greatness within and restore our global standing with the use of maximum, firm
international diplomacy and minimal force if and when indicated {" Peace thru Strenght "}.
Yours sincerely,
COL. A.M.Khajawall [Ret] MD.
Forensic psychiatrist, Disabled American Veteran and Iraq
Freedom team. Grass roots California leader per Senator McCain's mailings.
PS: Protect U.S.A from McCain-palin's reactive and knee-jerk reactions.
September 22, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hell, this is just Enron on an international scale!
September 22, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I want to find out who exactly lobbied the SEC to remove the uptick rule last year from short selling. This caused some of this volatile activity seen on Wall Street recently.
September 22, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well I can tell you who was responsible in part for this mess and I hate to do this - but goddamn it it was Clinton.
The Glass Steagall Act of 33 was gutted under Clinton and that would have prevented this mess.
The Democrats have been as bad as the Repugs about rolling back FDR's checks and balances on Wall Street.
September 22, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
And Bob Rubin is one of Obama's top advisers. I'm afraid the rot runs the entire breadth and depth of the Democratic Party.
Obama has an incredibly important opportunity- and duty- right now to detach himself from his party's neoliberal recent past and exert some real leadership on this proposed colossal heist of our money. Here's hoping he'll rise to the occasion. This is THE test that will determine whether he can be a transformational leader or basically just a caretaker President cleaning up a little around the edges.
September 22, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gee, McCain exposed as a running dog imperalist, capitalist warmonger paper tiger is really fun to watch. Whudda thunk?
September 22, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
This isn't a bailout, this is just setting up Bush's retirement plan and the plan of all those who helped him throughout these last few years.
Rick Davis is a scam artist. Phil Gramm should be slapped.
I'm not seeing the upside to this bailout or anything the Republicans are currently doing. It's just delaying the inevitable. Again, this is the Republican way, putting a bandaid on a broken arm and calling it "good to go!"
PS, this economic advice and forecasted costs are coming from the same people that said Iraq would be paid for by Iraqi oil and would only take 5 weeks. They have a tremendous track record... In screwing us.
September 22, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
McShame's hypocrisy is truly stunning. The old man lives in a bubble.
September 22, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Makes you wonder about Clinton, doesn't it?
AND, Hillary would have to be backpedalling trying to distance herself from Bill on this if she were the nominee...
Well, the good I see coming out of this is that "regulation" won't be a four-letter word anymore.
September 22, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can't wait for the ACORN/NACA/Obama/ Bad loan news to hit the MSM...let's see what % of NACA/ACORN loans are in default and how THAT was the problem...
September 22, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is just what it looks like. These guys make, 20, 30 million dollars per year. This year there's no money from the usual sources, so they want that cash from the taxpayers. While Paulson who made almost 40 million on this stuff last year lectures broke homeowners that it's a matter of them owning up to their personal responsibility if they couldn't do what the fine print said.
So, you say you want to cap their finacial orgy for this year? No, says the White House. Paulson and his buddies need a "clean bill" to extract further obscene sums, only this time from taxpayers directly.
September 22, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Keating 5 ads, run 'em!
September 22, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Last election these crowds that one could still hear echoing “four more years!” that resonated and ultimately stirred a winning cause, was based on Bush would do better in time of war. Did they forget the attracts happened on his watch?
I keep hearing polls insinuating McCain would do better in war because of his experience. Let’s reverse the situation. Who would do better making peace? Better yet. Who would do better in preventing war? Who is the best ticket on talks with our Arab and Muslim friends, McCain-Palin or Obama-Biden? Education is the key here, all nations learning from each other in a give and take of important attitude and feelings. One thing is certain, in the Muslim culture; it is easier for men to converse with each other rather then man and women that’s where Biden has the advantage over Palin. On the same token a man who cries fire (“I would fire him”) is a scary image of McCain’s hand slamming down on a big red button yelling “fire!” Our friends and allies of the Arab and Muslim nations would apt to have a better rapport with Obama
September 22, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink