NYT: Palin Personally Sought To Ban Book From Library
Among the many startling accusations against Sarah Palin in the new profile of her in The New York Times, this one truly stands out: Not only did Palin want the Wasilla librarian to ban books, but she is alleged to have personally pushed for a particular book to be removed before she became mayor:
Witnesses and contemporary news accounts say Ms. Palin asked the librarian about removing books from the shelves. The McCain-Palin presidential campaign says Ms. Palin never advocated censorship.But in 1995, Ms. Palin, then a city councilwoman, told colleagues that she had noticed the book "Daddy's Roommate" on the shelves and that it did not belong there, according to Ms. Chase and Mr. Stein. Ms. Chase read the book, which helps children understand homosexuality, and said it was inoffensive; she suggested that Ms. Palin read it.
"Sarah said she didn't need to read that stuff," Ms. Chase said. "It was disturbing that someone would be willing to remove a book from the library and she didn't even read it."
This is not the only accusation that Palin personally targeted a particular book for removal from the library on ideological grounds. It's also worth noting that Rev. Howard Bess, a liberal minister from the nearby town of Palmer, has accused Palin of successfully getting his own book, Pastor I Am Gay, banned from the library while she was mayor.















Very interesting read. But I'm not sure I'd pick up particularly on this one aspect. ("What aspect, Charlie?")
The overall impression it gives of her is very damning. I was more stricken by her hiring of high-school cronies.
But what comes across most is her pettiness, spitefulness, and vindictiveness. And the secrecy. Very Cheney-esque.
I shudder...
September 14, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, TPM-EC posters, this excerpt should give you reason to be afraid... very afraid!
Bloggers beware!
September 14, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK, I'll stop.
September 14, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
LIAR!
September 14, 2008 1:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I definitely agree, she seems to be the type of person who hires people because she agrees with them politically rather then hiring the most qualified person...I guess that might say a lot about McCain as well, as to why he picked her for VP.
She seems to mingle personal life with politics and that is just wrong.
Racially Biased Alert: Whitlock and DeMoss
September 14, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
It seems worse than that. She's interested more in loyalty than political orientation. She'd choose an apolitical, unqualified high-school friend over a competent outsider, regardless of their political compatibility.
September 14, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
And she would fire the competent outsider if he refused to -- oh, say, for instance -- fire a US Attorney she disagreed with.
She is so much like Bush it's not funny.
September 14, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reading the article, it's clear she has a lot of very, very scared people around her.
Couple it with what Frank Rich just wrote, and hopefully we're looking at a new line of attack / belittling:
--"PALIN/mccain"
--"McCain is too weak to lead; He's nothing without Sarah. He's given control of his campaign over to the wingnuts."
September 14, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Imagine a closed door session concerning a serious national problem. As the drama unfolds and NcCain decides on a specific course of action, Palin speaks up and suggests an alternative action plan and reminds McCain that she is more in tune with the voters than he. So if he wants the people's support he better follow her lead.
September 14, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin-Cheney/McBush!
September 14, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
a bush-league Bush.
amazing how mc/palin is making bush/cheney look like sages.
September 14, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Like the Alaska Agriculture director whose only qualification was that she liked cows.
And she's a Wasilla High classmate of Sarah Palin's. The REAL qualification.
Haven't we had enough unqualified cronies in positions of authority?
September 14, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The word juvenile comes to my mind.
September 14, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Alaskan women are on to her! Big protest against her yesterday in Anchorage drew over 1400 women!
Where did they protest? In front of the library!
Mudflats has tons of photos of the protest and a lively description:
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally-is-huge/
September 14, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Be sure you click on the photos - to see them enlarged.
September 14, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, "Daddy's Roommate" is a frequently challenged book and we've had trouble with it over the years at the Public Library wher I work. Or, rather, *patrons* have had trouble with it.
I suspect the ALA would like to get their hands on Ms. Palin now...
Like I warned before, don't get the librarians upset, Sarah...
Banning books is UN-American...but, what do you expect from a sessesionist...
September 14, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well this will piss off every librarian in the United States. Guaranteed. LOL
I have never seen such zealous champions for the First Amendment as America's librarians.
It certainly pisses me off - I'm almost a First Amendment absolutelist - and I sure as shit don't believe in any prior restraint, or any of this bullshit book censorship. Under any circumstances. -
September 14, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would ban Obama Nation. (This summer, I actually threw out a copy of my roommate's "Unfit for Command : Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" without his consent. Felt weird throwing out a book, but then realized it was just a bound set of pages with FauxNews lies, so then I felt better...)
September 14, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
The fundies have been practicing censorship in public libraries for quite a number of years. There's been many times I found Darwin's Origin of Species on a bookshelf totally unrelated to the book. But payback's a bitch. I in turn put the book back were it's suppose to be, then go over to the Christian shelves, pull an arm full of books and seed them in sections like Mythology, Astrology, Paganism, and so forth.
September 14, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Get it while the getting is good (it will be removed really soon)- SNL's opening with Tina Fey as Sarah Palin - http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6qz8c_sphc_fun
September 14, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tina Fey was SO spot on
September 14, 2008 2:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
This election is turning into something very peculiar.
There's no longer any serious doubt, among people paying attention, that Sarah Palin is unqualified to take over as President if needed. Even right-leaning pundits like David Frum and Ross Douthat are giving up on defending her.
There's no longer any serious doubt that McCain is running a campaign based on lies. McCain's own spokesman came very close to admitting it today, while flipping the media a bird and saying "whatcha gonna do about it?"
The only question that remains is whether any of this matters.
September 14, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Being incompetent didn't hinder them from defending Bush.
September 14, 2008 6:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's campaign is playing to the conservative/christian crowd. That group hates the MSM cause it tells the truth based on facts rather than the way it should be based on their faith and belief.
What's really scary is there may be just enough of them to sway the election to McCain now that he has Palin on his team. So feeding them lies to satisfy their distrust and hate of Democrats,liberals and anything not christian, conservative and republican will secure his election.
The truth doesn't matter. Only winning matters.
September 14, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden has already recieved enough information on her to just destroy her in the debate. She is a far right neo-con who is as not qualified to be in the White House. Biden doesn't need to attack her but let her destroy herself by asking her the right questions during the debate. Her views opinions and demeaner will reveal just how scary she is...Independents and many pro-choice intelligent republicans will not be voting for this ticket. The breadth of her knowledge and personal experience base is of a gnat! McConJob is a liar and Palin is not qaulified! Both losers.
We are going to win in November and it will not be close.
September 14, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. McSame is toast. Extra burnt. 100+ EV margin.
September 14, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not so sure about that. I've read that the conservative pundits have given her passing grades on her performance with Charlie. Area where she foundered were on questions they consider to be above the level of voter comprehension, such as the Bu$h Doctrine. Perhaps the average voter my not have a clear grasp of the Bu$h Doctrine (Charlie didn't quite get it right), but a Vice President candidate should be quite a bit sharper.
September 14, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah's slippery but Biden has a lot of experience dealing with slippery people.
At least now he shouldn't worry about looking like a bully after we've seen what a bully Palin is.
September 14, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree: her bullying has been done in private, and so Biden will have to be careful what he does in public view. So, for example, it would be a bad idea to ask her to take back that insulting thing she said about pitbulls.
September 14, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
That depends on the debates. In the past they haven't even slightly resembled real debates but were more like joint press conferences. The question is, will candidates get to question each other with followup? If not the "debates" will be irrelevant.
September 14, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's be careful with our terms: she is not a neoconservative. Neocons are "national greatness" conservatives, which works out to both militarism and a strong role for the Federal Government in promoting social goods. They are less enthusiastic about the government's promotion of religion, and more willing to increase social spending, than Bush (militarist "business Republican") and Palin (militarist theocrat).
A neocon will advance the idea of mandatory National Service as part of instilling the young with discipline and good habits (i.e., obedience and other skills conducive to living under a dictatorial rรฉgime). Business Republicans approve of the idea of making people more compliant employees, but worry about the drain on their labour pool's driving up wages. Theocrats think it must be linked up with the Great Beast and his black helicopters.
A neocon can believe in a generous social welfare scheme because a great nation should be too proud to allow its citizens to live in poverty; they're happier with this if there's a lot expected of those receiving help (e.g., menial labour, feeling ashamed of themselves). Business Republicans _hate_ social welfare, because anything that makes a boss' ability to fire you less dangerous decreases their power. Many Theocrats want more social welfare as long as its administered through the churches (and compliant synagogues, and the very odd mosque or two for appearance's sake).
(Cheat sheet: Neocons: ex-Democrats; Theocrats: ex-Populists of the Right [think George Wallace, an enthusiastic New Dealer]; Business Republicans: traditional country-club and chamber-of-commerce wonks.)
September 14, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
The debates can't come soon enough.
September 14, 2008 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saturday Night Live on Palin
September 14, 2008 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would also suggest that you guys follow this thread to see the "Values" voters that support this lady. Scared the crap out of me.
http://www.governmentalityblog.com/my_weblog/2008/09/can-you-find-palin-values-and-racism-in-one-place-larisa-did.html
September 14, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Scared me too. Just watching it on C-Span was scary actually and I wasn't even there to hear what they were saying off camera!
September 14, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's suppose to scare me? Before I left the US for a position overseas, I had many a run in with republicans at a local coffee shop and took a lot of heat because I wasn't one of them. There was no discussion. I was always being told how bad Democrats were and that everything we touched turned to crap. Four years later, I'm just chuckling to myself. And I do so hope the fruits of republican efforts in housing, banking, jobs, economy and so forth have found their way into their lives and they are enjoying the prosperity of the Bu$h years.
September 14, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
The book banning story reveals a lot about Palin's mindset. Chief among the items revealed is that the Alaskan Governor really does know best. Just ask her. And if you don't, she will clearly, according to reports, track you down and provide instructions, little pieces of business that she deems necessary for you to carry out. You retain the option to do what you're told, or the good governor cans your ass. She has it all figured it out, you see. It's up to the rest of us to simply get in line and be told what we can read. Perhaps if McCain blunders into the White House somehow, the U.S. citizenry will be asked to send in requests. Will it be all right to read such and such a book? Or has VP Palin determined that the book in question is not fit for perusal under the guidelines of her personal viewpoint of the Constitution?
Here, at any rate, is what you can surmise from all this: McCain has gone daffy. You have to wonder what his friends, the old dog Senators, are really thinking. They most assuredly watched Palin on TV with Gibson the other night. Are they partisan? You bet. Stupid? Well, you do wonder. Because it's one thing to put experienced, sophisticated political pros on a ticket and agree to disagree on the issues. Part of the deal should be that both sides are called upon to make responsible choices for the VP slot, mostly because it's sort of important to secure the interests of the country. The Republican side has been exposed in the last week as being regrettably lacking in judgment. Reflecting on the last eight years of Republican rule, it comes as no surprise, but better choices than Palin were certainly on the table. My God.
September 14, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's what I want to know. What do people like Chuck Hagel, Dick Lugar, Colin Powell, and even Condi Rice think about Palin?
I can understand party loyalty, but surely these people can't think it's a good idea to put her anywhere near the Whitehouse.
September 14, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. I think Hagel's being held back to bring down John when he really goes over the line. I'm hoping Hagel gives a prime time address just dismantling his long time friend for selling his soul.
PS - Looks like even Alan Greenspan doesn't want McCain in there. (Unless he was just issuing that statement to try to help re-write history and absolve himself from blessing Bush's tax cuts from hell...)
September 14, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't be surprised if Hagel has already said he'll endorse Obama and they're just waiting for the right time to make it public.
Hagel praised Obama for picking Biden and didn't say a word when Palin was picked.
September 14, 2008 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Remember when McCain offered Obama a cabinet post the other day? I kinda wish Obama would have hit back with something like:
"First, that won't be necessary. And second, if I didn't already have Chuck Hagel lined up to advise me in my cabinet, I really would have offered you something."
:)
September 14, 2008 1:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
We're picking up a lot of the intelligent center-right types. The people who care what Chuck Hagel thinks, or who care what the WaPo editorial board thinks, are already defecting from McCain.
But the number of people who care is limited. Steve Schmidt is doubling down on Rovian culture-war and big-lie tactics. He may lose a few hundred readers of Ross Douthat, but he doesn't give a damn.
The question is whether we can call McCain out on his lies in a way that gets through to WalMart shoppers.
September 14, 2008 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone else think the staid, fiscally responsible, high-minded foreign policy buff New England Republican is a thing of the past? Their party has vanished right before their eyes.
September 14, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. The New England Republican is a dead concept. Most I know (I'm in CT) are just laying low, and can't defend the choice of Palin or McCain's total sellout to the Right. Most will vote for Obama, or hold their nose and vote McCain, but the end result will be a deflated and demoralized Republican party in the Northeast. If Obama wins, and governs from the center, they will never go back.
September 14, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anewdude: Good point about Obama re-drawing the map. God I hope that happens. All he needs to do is usher in a new era of competence and the Lincoln Chafee's et al. will officially become Democrats. I like it.
September 14, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is one reason why making any kind of issue out of the banning of this particular book is not a good thing to do. It feeds into their cultural war distraction and takes us further away from discussing issues and McCain/Palin's honor and integrity.
September 14, 2008 2:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
except of course then the people who want to ban daddy's roommate and heather has two mommies will be the only ones who know that palin wants to ban those books. and swing voters who would be offended by the notion and/or turned off by palin's rabid anti-homosexual agenda won't know about it.
if one side decides to fire up the culture war in a desperate attempt to win the election - and make no mistake, this is why mccain picked palin - the other side can't just pretend it isn't so or that it doesn't matter. obama has to make sure that voters know who they're voting for.
September 14, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a Wasilla resident what it is looking more and more like is that she is actually appointing people from her CHURCH.
Even if most of them are merely from Wasilla High School, that in itself is scary. Wasilla High School is probably the most hillbilly drop out factory in the State - I'll home school my kids before I send them there.
Debbie Richter the Director the Permanent Fund Division which is responsible for the disbursement of over $1 billion got the job with NO college degree and 'bookkeeping' experience. My resume is similar only I don't believe myself to be qualified for such a job - what made her think she should apply for it? State Employees with 20+ years experience in finance can't get promotions above Supervisor without college degrees.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/palin_approved_govt_hiring_for.php
I knew this was the bible belt of Alaska when I moved out here, (which is likely why homes are cheaper) but I didn't know this kind of Christian cronyism was going on. I had heard some controversy over opening city council meetings with prayer.
September 14, 2008 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your perspective. More and more bizarre!
September 14, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the concept of Christian Cronyism. Well, I don't actually, but it's an apt phrase.
September 14, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. I just saw the ad on TV about her supporting the killing of wolves from planes here in Norther Virginia, devastating.
September 14, 2008 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
This article seemed significantly more hard hitting than other MSM coverage of Moosezilla to this point. Straightforward, factual, investigative, lacking the usual punch-pulling blather.
Factor in Sarah Meets Professor Charlie this week, and we're seeing a turning point in the election, an MSM shift toward ... actual journalism?
September 14, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain McCain McCain
Economy Economy Economy
Iraq Iraq Iraq
September 14, 2008 2:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are many who think this charismatic Oilbama speaks the truth. They think he cares about the plight of the working class. In truth, whenever the co-opted Oilbama has an opportunity to make a real difference, he marches in stride with the Bush regime. Oilbama has repeatedly waffled on the Iraq war. He refuses to denounce torture policies. Oilbama voted against the Coburn Amendment, which would have provided funds for rebuilding in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. He supports a preemptive nuclear strike against Iran. He does not support universal healthcare.
Oilbama voted for the Bush Cheney Energy Bill that contained 6 Billion in givaways to Big Oil.
Although recognizing that Bush has broken U.S. law, the โProgressiveโ politician refused to cosponsor a resolution by Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) to censure the President. Obama even voted to confirm right-wing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Oilbama campaigned for Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut (Bushโs closest Democratic ally). Oilbama is working hard, albeit quietly, to block the Progressive movement. If you havenโt guessed yet, Oilbama is a conservative wearing a liberalโs suit. On top of it all, this wolf in sheepโs clothing is a liar and a fraudโa political abomination conning America. Speaking at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, Oilbama brought forth a claim he would later use repeatedly to drum up public support. โMy fatherโฆ grew up herding goats, went to school in a tin-roof shack.โ In fact, Obamaโs sob story about being the son of a goat-herder is complete bullshit. In his 1995 autobiography Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, Oilbama writes that his grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was a prominent and wealthy farmer who emigrated from Kenya.
Oilbamaโs father was actually born into a privileged life, not one of โtin-shackโ poverty. Baraka Obama was a well-rounded student with a scholarship at a college in Hawaii when his future-senator-son was born in 1961. The goat herder myth exposes Barack Obama as a charlatan trying to gain public empathy by portraying his family as poor. Donโt buy it, folks!
As a matter of fact, Obamaโs lies are rampant. โMy parents,โ Obama said in his famous 2004 convention speech, โwould give me an African name, Barack, or โblessed,โ believing that in a tolerant America, your name is no barrier to success.โ As it turns out, both his father and grandfather were Muslims, and the name Barack has an Arabic origin. Ultimately, Barack Obama would join the Trinity United Church of Christ, leaving his familyโs Muslim roots in the dust. So why did Oilbama lie about his name? Why is he covering up his familyโs religious history? Why has he concealed the truth about his Muslim heritage as if it were some evil secret? Most importantly, what other issues has this deceiver been untruthful about?
Youโd think Oilbama would be happy to stand up for his Muslim lineage. Apparently not, especially if it means losing the strong support the Senator has received from the Jewish community. Instead of being forthcoming about his roots, Oilbama continually lies through his teeth, all the while hoping that nobody will notice. Well, we noticed, and now itโs our duty to expose the sneaky bastard. By trying to be Mr. Liberal while appeasing the right-wing power elite, Obama has helped shore up the Unitary Presidency. This is not what the Democratic Party needs. By ignoring the will of the people, Oilbama plays lapdog to the Bush Administration. Oilbama's refusal to act on the behalf of America is unforgivable.
Oilbama = 4 more years of Bush.
September 14, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Keep spreading the lies. We can see you are a troll. You have shown you are a republican shill in a democrat's costume.
September 14, 2008 2:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your cunning intellect is only rivaled by your ability to copy and paste.
September 14, 2008 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
*troll jizz"
September 14, 2008 2:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
This perfectly illustrates the doctrine that troll appearances gauge how much this is bad for McCain.
So-so bad, Lalo shows up to advise us not to pursue it. Worse than that, and DemBill comes in with his cut and paste job.
We'll see if this merits an appearance by Fogu and Weaver. Then we'll know they're worried.
September 14, 2008 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
How are things in Bizarro World, DemBillC?
September 14, 2008 3:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please chill. Take a STFU! pill.
September 14, 2008 8:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dem Bil C, the epitome of diseased troll jizz.
September 14, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, who farted?
September 14, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps Palin should read the constitution. I suggest the first amendment as a good place start. Perhaps there is more to Sarah that is close to Russia than geographical location.
Welcome to the beginning of the new dark ages people. I guess the republicans will spin this as Sarah saving the serfs from the onerous process of free thought. Books are dangerous, it makes the masses uppity and fills their heads with thoughts of democracy.
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Drill Baby Drill! Burn Baby Burn! Jesus saves! Well not you liberal heretics, Just our people!
George Orwell woefully underestimated what the totalitarian future would look like.
We must work diligently to keep it happening.
September 14, 2008 2:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is like George Bush's mini-me. Witty1's Wasilla insider point of view sent chills down my spine...on a smaller scale, she practiced the cronyist evisceration of government offices and gave succor to the forces of ignorance and intolerance. I know nothing about her Church, but membership in it does not strike me as a credential that allows anyone to occupy any office.
I think the tide is turning...but my question is one that many have posed here, how do moderate Republicans view what has happened to their party? So what's going on there guys? Are you ready to see this country run into the ground by a old man whose is so whipped already by his feisty sidekick that he has lost all of his bearings?
I want to hear from reasonable Republicans. At what cost your victory?
September 14, 2008 3:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
mccain may hire people who agree with his political opinions, but he did promise to appoint democrats to his cabinet if elected. ah yes! joe liberman. yet another lie in order to get elected.
September 14, 2008 3:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hilter banned and burned books.
Musolini banned and burned books.
Pol Pot attempted to wipe the educated from his country.
Reagan defunded the teaching of social sciences in California and nationally.
Bush 43 inflicted the Orwellian 'No Child Left' on our nation.
Palin is Standard Operating Procedure for these bastards (and bastardettes).
September 14, 2008 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is only one word that fully describes what this woman -- and by extension, the forces that make up the modern-day Republican Party -- is all about: fascism.
It's not a word I use lightly. But when it rears its ugly head, you've got to call it what it is if you want to have any chance of stopping it.
September 14, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
you may be right, but your argument is undercut by the fact that you're a moose.
September 14, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
first they came for the moose; I said nothing because I wasn't a mooseโฆ
September 14, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and I know more about them Russkis than Benito Moosolini in lipstick here, because I've been chased by Boris and Natasha. Maybe I should run for vice president.
September 14, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin's UN-American activities dovetails nicely into the Wingers ongoing campaign to paint Obama as a READER, so we should fear him.
September 14, 2008 3:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Everybody here knows that being a 'book-banner' makes her a hero to the facist plutocrats infesting the Republican Party, correct?
Being a 'book-banner' is only an affront to the sane and the reasonable.
There are folk that want to replace the American goddess, Columbia, with Palin.
BTW the defenders of Palin have finally realized that the moniker "Ministry of Truth" has negative conotations and are calling themselves the 'Truth Squad' now.
September 14, 2008 3:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Trying to ban books is both amateurish and unpatriotic.
September 14, 2008 4:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right wing Evangelical Christians WANT the government to ban books. This only makes Palin more of a hero in their eyes. Nothing Obama or the resposible media say can diminish her in their eyes. We have reached the dystopian future predicted in the last century. A huge segment of the population is blissfully ignorant--simply too stupid to vote responsibly. The media is owned by the corporations that devise the government's policies. It's a bit of a pickle.
September 14, 2008 4:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
England is rapidly becoming a surveillance state. Russians live in a propaganda bubble. The future is here now.
September 14, 2008 4:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Except Bess's book was never banned. It kept getting stolen off the shelf but was never banned.
September 14, 2008 4:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's one of the ways they're 'banning books' without actually saying so. After all, if it's not on the shelf, no one can read it. (They're do this by either stealing them, or checking them out and not returning them. The ALA is starting to track this stuff, to see what books disappear most often and find out if there is a pattern.)
September 14, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that the more the media calls out Palin's right-winged tendencies, the more the conservatives love her. And if somehow through miracles (punt intended) Palin's reputation is ruined, well then, she becomes a martyr for the righties.
Either way, we can't expect to win votes from these people. It's alost cause to try to turn red to purple/blue. Her popularity among conservative is well-established and can't be shaken from here on.
So any attack from now on should be made with independents and women in mind. Keep digging at her opposition to women's rights and taking the wrong side on women's issues. Keep highlighting her extremist stances on abortion, the environment, education, and religion.
One good thing about independents, vs. conservatives, is that they have brains.
September 14, 2008 5:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1155201977/bctid1790913093
September 14, 2008 8:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I actually don't think this particular accusation stands out. Before she was mayor, I don't care if she asked the library to remove a book. That's something that an average citizen absolutely has a right to do. It's not censorship until it comes with some official weight.
September 14, 2008 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
She was a city councilwoman at the time, not a private individual.
Plus, the episode exposes her claim (as if there was any doubt) that it was just a rhetorical exercise when she as mayor asked the librarian about censoring books.
September 14, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a long-time library employee and has dealt with this:
There is a procedure for challenging books in every public library. If Ms. Palin did not follow the procedure or sought to use her position as Councilmember to influence the librarian (once again-abuse of power), then she is at fault.
Yes, anyone can challenge a book and there are policies which govern this. It appears that Palin was trying to circumvent procedure...
September 14, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I finally figured out what really bothered me about Sarah Palin's affinity to pork (beyond the lying): The pork has feed the State's treasury from having to support those projects, which has led to the budget surplus, which has allowed for her to send those rebate checks to the citizenry that she's so proud if. In other words, she's taking federal dollars and paying them to her private citizens.
So long as any federal money is going to Alaska (let alone more per capata than anywhere in the country), where does she get off sending $3g in rebates to EACH Alaska resident? That's my money, and I want it back. Why isn't anyone in the press (or the Obama camp) making that connection: John McCain's "mavrick" has bought her in-state popularity with direct bribes paid by you.
This is outrageous.
September 14, 2008 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Which is no more than buying votes, right?
September 14, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wasilla, Alaskas crystal meth capital?
Well that explains the clouded judgement of the voters in Wasilla.
September 14, 2008 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
New Obama ad on McCain & lobbyists:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hisadministration_ad/
September 14, 2008 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Alaskan Women Against Palin rally in Alaska BIGGER than goodbye rally
link has pics for proof unlike the McSame/Rove campaign that lies their butt off
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally-is-huge/
September 14, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great to see.
September 14, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice catch.
September 14, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
WOW!!! KARL ROVE just said that McCain has gone too far in saying things that did not pass the "100% truth" test. Karl Rove thinks they are lying too much.
WOW!!!
September 14, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
When The View goes after you, then yes, one can say that you went too far. The View interview and the SNL skit with Fey probably cost McCain a percentage point or two.
September 14, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's hope so. That's all we need.
September 14, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
The basic principle of Rove was 50% plus 1. If it's a cultural wedge issue that will do it, then fine, who cares if 49% of America hate you. But this serial lying is undermining McCain not just with some voters, but with the media. The untouchableness that he gathered from the POW glow is gone. He is now just McCain the candidate.
September 14, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The governor and her top officials sometimes use personal e-mail accounts for state business; dozens of e-mail messages obtained by The New York Times show that her staff members studied whether that could allow them to circumvent subpoenas seeking public records.
Rick Steiner, a University of Alaska professor, sought the e-mail messages of state scientists who had examined the effect of global warming on polar bears. (Ms. Palin said the scientists had found no ill effects, and she has sued the federal government to block the listing of the bears as endangered.) An administration official told Mr. Steiner that his request would cost $468,784 to process.
When Mr. Steiner finally obtained the e-mail messages โ through a federal records request โ he discovered that state scientists had in fact agreed that the bears were in danger, records show.
โTheir secrecy is off the charts,โ Mr. Steiner said.
Cheney with lipstick
September 14, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Noun+Verb+Lie
September 14, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
That email scheme is, of course, exactly like what the Bushies did for years, using RNC accounts instead of White House accounts. Which helped them avoid getting nailed in the Plame scandal.
September 14, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's official: Obama raised 66 M $ in August...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/stephanopoulo-1.html
...with half million new donors included.
September 14, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Per the Times article, I thought it was chilling that Palin had designs on much higher office even back when she was mayor of Wasilla. She strikes me as a sort of Willie Stark character. The drive for power creates a justification for the reflexive lying. The lack of anxiety she shows as she lies makes me wonder if she's a sociopath.
September 14, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it is more of the far religious right's belief that the end (returning America to Christ) justifies the means. They are on a holy mission from God.
September 14, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
In the clip of her talking to her church (the one where she asks people to pray for the pipeline, etc.), what creeped me out most was her saying that what she does as governor won't matter if people's hearts aren't right with God.
Hey, Governor: My relationship (if any) with God is none of your damn business!
September 14, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Bloom coming off of Palin as Alaska Women Reject Palin Rally is HUGE!
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally-is-huge/
Politicians who lie to the public are engaging in a Betrayal of the Public Trust and it should be deemed unethical and a part of the past as we move toward a more Holistic way of life here in America.
Great Film Exposing John McCainโs Lies โ Pass it on!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH0xzsogzAk
Are we finally pulling back the Curtin on the Wizards?
Lastly, Ground Zero is a Symbol and a message of Republicans' failed policies and a gaping Wound, that after 7 years Ground Zero is still a hole, still zero -- that we were unable to lift ourselves out of the ashes and make ourselves whole again. You see, nothing from nothing leaves nothing and that is not Change we can believe in!
September 14, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain campaign has the Christian wingnuts, the racists, the stupid and the neocons. I question whether they have conservatives particularly since the Democrats are so eager to wrap themselves in conservatism. I mean when was the last time a corporation had anything to fear from a Democrat! And McCain doesn't even have all of the far right since a number of them are backing Paul and Barr.
September 14, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, that's a great book. The illustrations are use bold, clear lines and involve gay culture in an intelligent and slyly funny but innocuous way.
"Heather has Two Mommies," however, is boring and annoyingly politically correct, with crowded, busy visuals.
September 14, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
We should all be grateful that McCain selected Sarah Palin because now it should become clear to everyone that 20-25% of the electorate (the Religious Right) believe that they should impose their beliefs on the other 75%.
The Religious Right are as sure as the Taleban that they are directed to impose their will on us because they talk to God, talk in tongues, and believe we may be in the End Times.
Do you want one of these crazies anywhere near the presidency of the United States? The cynical Maverick McCain has turned to them hoping his Hail Sarah pass will win the election. He has simultaneously thrown the rest of us under the bus.
If I were John McCain I'd hire a food taster; the base obviously prefers Sarah to John.
September 14, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know if Tonya Harding had a sister, But i bet her and Sarah would have a lot to talk about.
September 14, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome. The falsehoods and "fixed" facts are piling up like drifting snow. I would't trust Sarah to give me the correct time.
The next fifty or so days should be interesting.
Tag line for my posts (elsewhere) is:
"I'm John McCain, and I approve of this LIE."
September 14, 2008 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just don't get the MSM. After all of this, they bring Chuck Schumer on Meet the Press and spend 10 minutes asking him about polls. Huh? Is that what voters need to know? How about pointing out that the McCain Campaign is an orwellian lie: A group of lobbyists saying they're going to get rid of the lobbyists.
And then Rudi G. comes on there, gets confronted with McCain's statement that Palin's top national security credential is energy. So you can hear the follow-up, right? "You have said that we're facing down radial Islamic extremists. Even assuming that Sarah Palin knew more than anyone in the U.S. about energy, how does that prepair her to face down radical Islamic extremists?" But no. He asks whether Sarah Palin knows more about energy than MIT scientist. WTF?
September 14, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more thought: Voting on the basis of race is not acceptable in the United States in 2008. It is completely irresponsible for Tom Brokaw to talk about the "Bubba vote" without condemning it. Shame on you Tom Brokaw. There are not two sides to racism. Shame on you.
September 14, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I use to think the only way to change the form of government was either by Constitutional Convention of armed force. Bu$h has shown a third way; utter contempt. And he's succeeded! The repug$ in both houses of Congress helped pave the street and the Democrats stood by helpless. Now enter Palin.
The contempt for the government shown by Bu$h and Cheney has been political. If Palin gets to Washington, we'll see the religious right exert their power to force their christian doctrine on everyone. Book banning, religious observance of Sunday and holy days. You name it and thy will be done.
September 14, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain campaign is defending Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's much-criticized inquiry into banning books at her hometown library, saying her questions were only hypothetical.
September 14, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
And somehow that's a defense. "I mean, hypothetically, what's our policy on book banning? You know, do we frown on that or what? I'm just asking."
I don't get it. CNN would be ALL OVER Obama for something like this. But it makes her plucky?
September 14, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's all well and good for the Times to publish this, but on CNN, they've been running a "fact check" spot all weekend claiming that the book banning accusations have been "debunked".
They're already pre-seeding this debunking story with low information voters, so that by the time this new information filters its way more visibly to the voters at large, they'll already have heard about and formed an opinion about the validity of the story. This will make McCain's "OMG, teh media is sexist" claims hold that much more water.
I'm honestly not liking the way this election is beginning to shape up. Not one bit. Way too many supposedly impartial voices out there that are helping the Republicans pull another one over on us all.
September 14, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Far out! Sarah Palin has had an effect on the base to the tune of 66 million. Glad to see I'm not the only one totally freaked out by this clueless Bush clone.
September 14, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, Dem BillC, how does it feel to ascribe to a political philosophy so odius that you need to sell your position by lying and pretending to be a member of the other side? I hope you're getting paid well for this...
September 14, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are right that the ideology of the far right in this country is indistinguishable from the classic definition of fascism. And that is exactly why there is a rise in the use of the word fascism by the right when talking about liberals. This is one of the classic strategies of Rove...if you're doing something, or are something, then accuse your opponent of it. That way they do two things:
1.Confuse people about the meaning of the word.
2.Get the media to report it as a "he said, she said" thing.
The media generally play along and just report that each side is "playing the Hitler card". It would just be biased to tell people what the term actually means and tell people which side actually resembles the term
A classic example of this is shown in this thread by Dem BillC in accusing the Democratic candidate as being sold out to the oil companies. I wonder which side has really sold out to the oil companies...the side wanting to put a windfall profits tax on them or the side chanting "Drill baby, drill!".
September 14, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even if you remove Palin from the equation there is still serious problems. She's just a water girl for the big team. She can try and rouse up support with her cheers and body movements but she could never put on the uniform and play for the big guys. So I'm sure that she even recognizes the token she is. She is there to carry a message only. The Republicans will shoulder her with all the emotional issues she can carry. The Republicans need someone who can deflect attention away from the real issues facing the country. If it isn't Palin it will be another political whore. The government is full of them.
Hoa binh
September 14, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I think it is more of the far religious right's belief that the end (returning America to Christ) justifies the means. They are on a holy mission from God."
I do not agree. Their actions and methods are the antithesis of Christ. I have come to the conclusion they do NOT actually believe in Christ. They just use Him as a figurehead to cover their crimes against humanity. To wit, can you imagine any sane person thinking they can FORCE Christ to return through destroying His world? Bah.
September 14, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll bet by the end of the week there's a Palin/McCain ad . . . and Palin/McCain is what this ticket is turning into (and not altogether slowly) . . . claiming that she fought the good fight to keep hard core pornography out of Alaskan public libraries.
The depressing part, of course, is that there's a 30 percent chance such an ad will materialize.
September 14, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
So if you're betting on a 30% chance, you must be giving odds, right?
September 14, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
That she is so much like Bush, but this is not at all a coincidence.
She's learned from watching. And I'm guessing that's part of the reason McCain brought her on.
People should be made aware that McCain is endorsing the same kind of competence blind cronyism that brought us the (lack of) response to Katrina, and the "enhanced interrogation" techniques of Abu Graib.
September 14, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a beauty to the Republican strategy of the last few decades. It's completely seamless...
(1) Spend years creating the myth of the "liberal press".
(2) Build on the "liberal press" meme by talking about how the press is in Obama's "pocket".
(3) So anything the press says that disputes their version of the "facts" is just more evidence of the press's bias.
It's like the "Roach Motel" for conservative voters. Voters check in, but they don't check out!
That's what made Brian Rogers remarks so interesting to me (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/216648.php). He's just so proud of their creation!
September 14, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder how the book banning story will play with women. I've worked in an independent bookstore for years, mostly on a part-time basis. One thing that's pretty well known in the industry is that women are bigger readers and probably enjoy a broader range of material than men. Men tend to not read fiction. Women read fiction, but they also read other stuff. You can figure that some of these are in the moderate Republican column. Some of them are probably already leaning toward Obama. (Just guessing.) Some of them, however, may be leaning toward McCain and Palin. I would think that the banning story would not help McCain and Palin with moderate Republican women who like to read books. Who knows?
September 14, 2008 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
The idea that this moronic bitch could be the arbiter of first amendment interpretation ANYWHERE makes me fear that this country has gone fucking mad, allowing the fundamentally stupid to have any right to vote. How the fuck do we rectify this??
September 14, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
What we should publicize is that Palin has "executive experience" all right, and she is terrible at it--cronyism, covertness, unethical behavior, etc. Re the library story check out these two:
http://librariansagainstpalin.wordpress.com/about/
and
http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/Sarah-Palin-Small-Mind-In-by-Judy-Swindler-090804-485.html.
From the first cite I learned that the librarian that Palin harassed was Mary Ellen Emmons who has since left Wasilla, remarried and is now Mary Ellen Baker working at a Fairbanks library. Palin "'essentially forced Mary Ellen out,' says Jane Pinnell-Stephens, chair of the Alaska Library Association Intellectual Freedom Committee and a friend of Baker's. 'She all but fired her.'"
September 14, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush and Nixon rolled into an attractive gun toting package. Brilliant marketing.
http://palincounter.blogspot.com/
September 14, 2008 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
This whole thing is like an episode of The Onion. Forget McCain dying--what if his cancer comes back and he has to undergo surgery. She's president while he's under--and another 9/11 happens. The jets are scrambled, and she has to give decide whether or not to shoot down passenger jets. How can anyone in this country possibly be okay with this scenario? Or if a rumor shot through the media while McCain was in surgery that something was wrong, and the markets starting crashing. Would she have any idea what to do? It's completely frightening.
September 15, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
What she can do is choose a hell of a baby name. I think I found the sources . . . she plugs them into the Sarah Palin Baby Name Generator and out comes something to do with guns or hurting things: http://www.personal-space.com/palin
September 15, 2008 3:09 AM | Reply | Permalink