MSNBC: Electoral Map Shifts Toward Obama
This morning, Chuck Todd and the rest of MSNBC's political team crunches the polls and shifts its electoral map in favor of Obama, with a couple of real surprises:
Four new states have been added to our Toss-up category: three red states (Florida, Indiana, and North Carolina) and one blue state (Pennsylvania). This gives Obama a 212-174 edge, after his more narrow 233-227 lead last week.What's interesting about these shifts is that while Obama is showing an improvement in fast-growing states (CO, FL, NV, NC, VA), he can't seem to put away the Northern tier states of slow-growing states (MI, PA, WI) or make progress in what some believe is still the all-important state of OH.
So it's now...
Likely Obama: CA, CT, DE, DC, HI, IL, ME, MD, MA, NY, RI, VT (157 electoral votes)Lean Obama: IA, MN, NJ, NM OR, WA (55 votes)
Toss-up: CO, FL, IN, MI, NV, NH, NC, OH, PA, VA, WI (152 votes)
Lean McCain: MO, MT (14 votes)
Likely McCain: AL, AK, AZ, AR, GA, ID, KS, KY, LA, MS, NE, ND, OK, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, WV, WY (160 votes)
That Indiana is now a toss up rather than a "leans McCain" is a real surprise -- Obama's heavy play for the state had widely been seen as little more than an effort to force the Repubs to spend time and money on a broader map. The RNC is now sinking cash into ads there, and it's not out of reach for the Dems. And North Carolina and Florida are toss-ups, too!
Overall, the shifts are yet another sign of the extent to which the economic meltdown has completely stalled -- and even reversed -- McCain's momentum coming out of the convention and the announcement of his choice of Sarah Palin. What's more, early polling suggests that McCain's debate performance -- on national security, his strength -- won't change this trend.















No thanks. Im going to stick with Nate Silver's analysis at FiveThirtyEight.com. The fact that Todd lists Iowa and New Mexico as "lean Obama" when he has double digit leads in both states makes me question his methodology. Plus, we haven't seen any post-debate polling in any of these states yet.
September 29, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Even worse - NJ is in the "lean" category. Are they ever going to give up on that tease. Obama will take the Garden State by 7 to 10pts. That's not a "lean".
September 29, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. Every election it seems that the GOP tries to say that NJ will be a toss-up and every election the Garden State always goes Democratic by a hefty margin.
I'm beginning to think that it's all spin...
http://thepajamapundit.com/
September 29, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree! While McCain of 2000 probably could have played in NJ, his shift to the rightwing, capped by his pick of barnyard bumpkin fundicrat Sarah Palin sealed the deal for Obama.
September 29, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good call on that.
I'd also put CO, WI and MI in "lean Obama" at this point.
September 29, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
WI has always been lean Obama. To put it otherwise is innuendo. It'll be close, as it always is, but until I see differently - if we're to give credence to the categories - it's lean Obama.
September 29, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
It isn't good business for Todd to tell the truth. Again, they love them a horserace. If you move WI, CO, and MI to where they belong, as lean Obama, all of a sudden NBC would be admitting that this thing is teetering on the edge of a blowout five weeks out.
September 29, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Same with OR. WTF, McCain is barely breaking 40 points.
September 29, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with MSM, in my opinion, is evenhandedness. MSNBC is falling into this trap pretty bad.
September 29, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chuck Todd is probably the best numbers man in the MSM.
The problem is he's still in the MSM.
September 29, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, but in this case he's plain wrong.
September 30, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two words for all of you in Nov- Land slide
or is that one word? Obama 40 to 41 states
September 30, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, please fix the R2000 poll. Obama is at 51, not 41. It makes me sick to see McCain with a lead!
September 29, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think MI,WI and PA are toss up. I am pretty confident that these states will go blue come November.
September 29, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
PA would be a miracle.
September 29, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
A miracle to whom?
September 29, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
PA a toss-up? It is as much a lean to Obama as NM. Check out the polls at www.fivethirtyeight.com
McCain has exactly one favorable poll all summer, and that came from Zogby - not exactly reliable results from that outfit. His margin isn't huge there, but all polls are confirming the same result. I wouldn't call that one a toss-up. MSNBC is being too conservative here.
Otherwise, I'm pretty much in agreement.
September 29, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I take that back. Put MI in the Obama lean category, as well. Then, I'm in agreement w/MSNBC.
September 29, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more: CO should be a Lean for Obama, as well.
Then, I'd say they have it about right.
I think that their analysts are weighing margins too heavily. They have to look at trending patterns.
September 29, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Indiana is really in play. Particularly since the heavily populated northern part of the state shares a media market with Chicago.
Obama has 40 field offices there, and they should be burning the midnight oil.
September 29, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Indiana is definitely in play not only because of the proximity of the northwest area to Chicago but also because of the big student population.
September 29, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's comment about getting rid of ethanol subsidies wont help him in the Midwest, including Indiana.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/27/75340/5729/979/612266
September 29, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, a lot of corn in Indiana. Plus, I wonder how much influence that David Letterman's recent comments had in his home state of Indiana.
September 29, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I live in Iowa. Corn prices have been doing so well that I don't think there'll be much back lash about getting rid of subsidies. A lot of farmers are also fiscal conservatives who are worried about the deficit.
September 29, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's getting is bassackwards.
The very reason that corn prices have risen so much this year is because the spike in gas prices led to increased demand for biofuels. McCain has long opposed the very product that caused corn prices to rise in the first place.
September 30, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is also a sizeable "rust belt" portion of the state that has been suffering economically for sometime.
September 29, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I live in Madison and work in Milwaukee WI and pay pretty close attention to state and local politics. Everything I've seen heard and read says Obama is farther ahead in Wisconsin than Todd seems to want to give credit for. I think WI is hardly a toss-up and may be more solidly Obama than even "leans"...
September 29, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
These guys get up in the morning and think, "what can we say today to make the race seem close." If they admit the race is over now, no one is going to tune in until Nov. 4.
September 29, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
Since I think the polls consistently run below where I think Obama really is because I don't think the samples reflect reality, I think it's better than this even.
If the polls are showing this good, the reality is far better, in my view.
My view though is skewed - I don't like polls.
September 29, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you, Tena, about the polls not reflecting reality. Many of these are based on "likely voter" models, where I think a lot of Obama's voters wouldn't be considered a "likely voter" (youth, past voting patterns, etc.). In addition, there is no way these polls are including a lot of the new registrants. Those things have got to add at least a couple points to Obama's numbers.
September 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
And not only that, they're probably tired of getting berated by the steady stream of Reeps whining about 'liberal media bias'. By downplaying Obama's growing lead, they are less likely to upset the Reeps' very delicate sensibilities.
September 29, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it will be close in Texas and nobody else does. I think Obama can carry Texas if turnout is anything like it was during the primary and I don't know why it wouldn't be.
But I may not say this again - nobody thinks Texas is even close, and I can't go against all the CW.
September 29, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it will be close--much closer than anyone thinks. Texas demographics are so fluid, so much population influx, that I don't think anyone has a real grasp on how the voting will break down.
No one anticipated the 2006 blue wave in Dallas County either.
September 29, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Frog Leg - actually, there was a story in the WaPo right after the '04 election that analyzed the numbers in TExas for a trend and they predicted we'd go blue.
After the '06 election the headline in the Dallas News was: Democrats poised to hold county for at least another 20 years. I'm not kidding - it said that and that is what is the reality in Dallas Co.
We'll see but I know what sentiment towards Bush is in Texas these days and he's just as hated there as anywhere else in the country.
September 29, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
The two of you keep doing this to me, getting my hopes up, especially because I tend to agree.
For the life of me, I cannot understand how Cornyn will be re-elected in the richly diverse and pluralistic Texas I live in today.
September 29, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't ask me cause Cornyn is a hopeless clown.
September 29, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it takes real effort to make Kay look like the intelligent one.
September 29, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only real big hangup is the redistricting map - but it didn't stop us in '06 - we just gained all over the state in areas and in numbers that really rocked the GOP.
It did.
September 29, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
My one real strong hope is that the Texas House switches. I think there is a strong chance of that. I would love to see the hissy fit Craddick would throw in that event.
September 29, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I like Chuck Todd, but it's pretty obvious what's going on here. Iowa: lean Obama? Sorry, Iowa's off the table now. McCain's already pulling his guys. If Colorado is still a true tossup, then so is Missouri. And West Virginia is no longer a solid Likely McCain at this point.
But hey, what do I care. No need to get complacent, so I'd rather they not declare this thing over just yet.
September 29, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely, HW. Of course, this isn't a narrative that you'll hear discussed in the Press, because the drama is their bread and butter. McCain wouldn't have been able to play that strategy without their complicity. The fact that the campaign has turned back to real issues is kind of a downer for the Press - means they have to start actually doing their jobs, and stop treating this like some reality television show.
September 29, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Several comments:
Anyone who thinks this race is "over now" must have been born yesterday. Democrats have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory TOO many times for anyone to think or talk that way.
On the one hand, of course, we know the polls are skewed because of the limited polling of cell-phone users and the bad weighting of 18-29's (Nate Silver's analysis at fivethirtyeight about this, with proper sourcing to Ann Selzer, is convincing on this point). Nonetheless, WANTING the youth vote to come out does not mean they will: they haven't SO MANY times before.
On the other hand, as the article in the Times this a.m. shows, the problem of how race is going to effect the vote is an open question, particularly in (gasp) the northern states. Michigan and Ohio are states seething with resentment, and everyone knows that the Republicans have mastered the stoking of these kinds of flames. I simply can't underestimate the POTENTIAL power of racism to alter the outcome.
BUT--and here again I"m swayed by the numbers analysis of Nate Silver--I do NOT see Ohio as crucial. In fact, I'm writing it off: I'm assuming that, among the threats of racism, corruption at polling booths, and all-around disorganization, Obama will be no better able to pull off a victory in Ohio than Kerry.
BUT....Ohio really doesn't matter, not given the importance of such states as Virginia, Colorado, and New Mexico. Like many here, I agree that the Upper Midwest (the trifecta of Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin) WILL go to Obama, so the "crucial" states lie elsewhere.
The one state about which I am constantly afraid: Michigan. The campaign is dirty up there, and there is a lot of underlying resentment in general that is easily preyed upon up there.
DO NOT think that this is over. Remember how many voters (not young people who plan on voting but don't) want someone who is as stupid and uninterested in things as they are: how else can they CONTEMPLATE voting for a ticket that includes Palin?
Man, for a party that has only won the presidency with an extreme middle-of-the-roader like Clinton in the last THIRTY-TWO YEARS, we are certainly capable of some serious cockiness.
September 29, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
ohio does matter.
it goes Obama, quite easily.
just wait and see.
racism is here too, but you would not be seeing such a swing towards Obama if it were as big a factor as you believe.
September 30, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
And thanks for being another cold water carrier for McLAme.
September 29, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did anyone notice that McCain called the Mujahadeen led by Bin Laden as 'freedom fighters' who drove out the Russians in Afghanistan.
Read About it Here
http://www.newsone.com/elections/article/mccain-called-bin-laden-a-freedom-fighters
September 29, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes,
I thought that Obama should have pointed out that we created Bin Laden, just like we created Saddam.
September 29, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Texas will NOT be close. We know these truths to be self-evident: a large plurality of America votes based on emotion. The two strongest emotions are fear and anger. No one has ever run a campaign based on feeding these two emotions better than the Republicans. Democrats, as this site shows ample evidence of, can usually whip up a frenzy of indignation, but indignation does NOT get the job done. Harumph nearly always loses to "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more."
So whenever you start feeling all warm and cozy inside about this election, please remember how irrational the populace is (it DOES make one despair of democracy).
What keeps ME from despair? The quality of Obama's ground game and the degree to which he has managed to maintain such a cool exterior. There ARE a lot of pissed-off democrats: hope they actually vote. (This problem of people not voting is clearly on my mind.)
September 29, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Eh - Who died and made you Einstein?
September 29, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Must have been Einstein himself. Always liked the guy.
September 29, 2008 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yousa. "Cold water carrier?" I'm so pro-Obama it's not funny. I'm just not a fuzzy thinker nor rah rah.
September 29, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nope, not buying it.
You're a big bucket of cold water.
September 29, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
FWIW, I agree with you about OH, PA and MI, except that I think MI is starting to show marked Obama advantage. Would that the other two were, or at least, if PA were more so. There's no room for complacency. Unlike last cycle, though, there are a lot more states in play. In 2004, I gave up on Virginia and traveled to PA to GOTV, and Kerry won PA (not by much, mind you). This year, it's all about VA, so that's where I'll be.
The thing about cellphones and the youth vote: People will keep saying this, until one day, it will be true. Youth turnout has risen over the last 8 years, but not enough. Likewise, cellphone usage to the exclusion of landlines is definitely increasing, but since no one is polling cellphone users, no one can say precisely what difference it would make -- are they as likely to vote, and how would they vote if they did? I think Pew estimates a 2-3 point difference in Obama's favor if cellphone users were in the polling sample. That's a helluva difference.
September 29, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beautiful. So typical. Let's see: I've manned the calling banks for Obama this week in my own school (along with several of my young [high school] students. I wear the coolest shirt on the upper west side (BaRACK and SOUL), being sold by my local soul food place, proifts to Obama, and I'm maxed out in the general election already. I'll admit I have NOT gone down to Pennsylvania to knock on doors, but as a person who has elsewhere posted about my DISlike of Hillary (she IS my senator, and I have voted for her) and my great love of Obama, I'm simply focused on what one really needs to think about in this last month.
And you're, for want of a better term, are either a child or an idiot.
September 29, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them an idiot. If you're an educator as you imply, you should know better than that. In addition, I don't think that analyzing the polls and getting a good feel for the reality on the ground is necessarily "cockiness". Most of us feel like we've been wandering in the desert for a long time - it's unrealistic to not expect people to express joy when things finally appear to be headed in the right direction.
I see very few people around here talk about this election "being over"...and even if they do, they usually continue on about how it's still very important to volunteer, donate, etc. Thank you for doing your part....but most everyone around here is also out there doing every that they can to put Obama into office. I think they also deserve your respect and thanks.
September 29, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you, but there hadn't been disagreement. Instead, I'd been accused of being in favor of McCain: that is not disagreement; that is casting aspersions. I cast one back.
That's how life goes, Mr. Cat.
September 29, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not a "mr.", thank you.
September 29, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not a "mr.", thank you.
September 29, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not a "mr.", thank you.
September 29, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you DK2008. I'm glad to see Obama ahead in the polls, but I'll incubate my eggs and count my chickens after they hatch. Don't let this kind of nonsense get to you.
September 29, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Todd is trying to male this closer than it is. RCP even has MI as lean Obama and WI and PA are not going to go Red...this is nonsense.
Go to www.fivethirtyeight.com if you really want to see what is happening
September 29, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep! Nate Silver is the man.
September 29, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree with John Nall. FiveThirtyEight has by far the best analysis of the polls and their meaning.
September 29, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Many people are looking at the outcome of the debates to see if there may be some reason for polls shifting. Look elsewhere....Let's be clear, people may have taken time to see the debate, but they are taking a lot more time to watch the economy, the market, their own personal bank books! It is as though this Administration, and the Congress, watched a house catch on fire on a Monday, then waited, only to decide to pick up a fire extinguisher on Friday when the srtucture is toast! Insane and highly unprofessional to say the least.
Weatherman are more reliable then those on Capital Hill these days. Time for a real CHANGE!
September 29, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Growing states = younger voters, Static states = older voters? How about a poll that accounts for the number of cell phone only voters vs landline only voters?
September 29, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
They were only freedom fighters because we were training and supplying them in one more of our proxy wars against the Ruskies, doncha know? Once the Soviet Union collapsed, who cares about some brown people across the world, anyway? (my paraphrasing of the Republicans attitude toward the Pushtun tribal factions in Afghanistan and Pakistan)
Always remember, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
September 29, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I do believe Indiana is in play myself.
Before, people would have felt like they would have got laughed at and shot for having a Kerry sign out in their yard (yes, they are that fascist... i mean conservative here), but if you look now, Obama signs all around Goshen. They make up 40-50% of all the signs. One guy even painted his barn!
A business next to that barn (even though it had nothing to do with it, only guilt by association) got harassed by the geriatric supporters that are oh so very common around here. They lost about half of their business.
Obama beat Hillary in this county 59%-41% which is a 4,800 vote margin. Elkhart County is in the very top-center here: CNN Indiana Primary Results
Nate at fivethirtyeight.com said yesterday about new polls that came out then:
"Among these results, the only remotely interesting one is Kentucky, and then only because it suggests that Obama might be able to avoid a complete disaster in Southern Ohio."
Yes, doing good in Kentucky is a major factor here too since southern Indiana could easily be called Northern Kentucky. It will help Obama to not get steamrolled over in southern Indiana and lose Indiana.
One person here mentioned we have a lot of colleges. They are right. I work at one. Northern Indiana will go to Obama, I promise you that. By BIG numbers too! We just need Indianapolis to also or Obama might not be able to pull it off.
One last note (I hope someone finds something out of everything I've written interesting). There is a McCain and Obama office caddy corner from the coffee shop (latte sipping liberals anyhow...). I drove by at about 10 at night. McCain's was dark, Obama's was lighted with a woman running around doing something in there. If Indiana goes blue, that would be one of the biggest miracles I think I would have ever seen.
September 29, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well god knows we're all keeping our fingers crossed and I hope you get your wish about Indiana!
September 29, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have to agree that CO, MI, PA NH, and WI are more "lean Obama" (if not "likely Obama") for the fall. It's like Chuck Todd is ignoring the polling and just making stuff up as he goes along.
Likely Obama: 157 electoral votes
Lean Obama: 55 electoral votes
CO,MI,PA,NH,WI: 61 electoral votes
That's 273 (VICTORY)..... and Obama will win at least 1 of the actual "toss up" states.
In fact if the focus stays on economy (which it will), I predict Obama picks up VA, OH, and FL as well. If that prediction holds true... then Obama would have (drum roll, please)...
333 Electoral Votes.... an electoral vote mandate, in my eyes.
I am starting to feel this might be be a popular vote mandate, as well. Perhaps 51% for Obama, 45% for McCain and the other 4% split amongst 2nd tier candidates.
September 29, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
No way the 3rd party candidates get more than 1 percent of the vote. If Obama beats McCain by 5-6 points he will garner 330-370 electoral votes. Trust me, in 2012 it will get even better with Arizona, Texas and Alaska in play (unless Palin is the nominee).
P.S.Indiana is the first state to finish counting votes and revealing it's results. I am telling you, if those commentators come out and say "Barack Obama has won Indiana". I am going to sleep, because this race is in the bag.
September 30, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/impulsively-unreflective-duo-incrisis.html
Monday, September 29, 2008
The Impulsively Unreflective Duo In..."Crisis on Wall Street!"
The Impulsively Unreflective Duo In:
Crisis on Wall Street!
John McCain is leaning back in a chair in his office in the Fortress of Irritability. An aide is carrying in a map of Spain when the Macphone rings.
McCain (answering): Fire Cox! Send him to Yugoslavia! Hello?
Hank Paulson (on other end of line): John, it's Hank. We are here in the Capitol. Every financial expert is assembled here, John. We have consulted every master, conferred with the widest and most informed authorities, asked every adept. We need you, John, you, with your mastery of financial expertise, to arrive at the door of our ineptitude and help us find an answer.
John, you must...suspend the campaign.
McCain: Suspend the campaign? But...the people need need my expert advice here, Hank. (Aide is unfolding the map on a table, circling Spain in red, and writing in large bold letters "Not Czechoslovakia"). They need me here. Where my acts can matter most. In...
Aide: The Fortress, Sir.
McCain: The Fortress, Hank. I can't just sit up and say "I suspend my campaign." That would look to anyone like the most clear act of political pandering, why, it's just...just...(the "I" on his chest lights up and begins to blink). I'll do it!
Hank: That's wonderful, John. We'll see you...
McCain: (Standing up, cape waving behind him) In a moment!
Aide: (to McCain): But who will man the fortress?
McCain walks to secret bookshelf. Removes book entitled "Courage". The bookshelf magically spins, revealing a grey vault. McCain turns the combination lock.
McCain: 21...72...23...skidoo...Drat! (starting again) 21...90...I'm sure that I disagreed with President Bush a lot of the time, Senator Obama! (pauses).
Aide: Let me help you with that, Sir. (quickly turns the lock left, right and left. The door of the vault slowly opens, with the sound of a vacuum seal.
This reveals a large auditorium, filled with advisers, cameras, and teleprompters. Over loudspeakers, a voice is filling the hall with sound: "The capital of Iraq is...Baghdad. Bagh...dad. The capital of Iran is..."
On the stage is Sarah Palin. She is holding a college text entitled "World Geography".
Palin: Ooooh. I know this one!
An adviser is standing to her right.
Adviser: Take your time, Sarah. Remember--think before you talk.
Palin: I know, I know. Can't I just say "A place that is deserving of our freedoms"?
Adviser: We've been over this before, Sarah. Remember--"Specific is terrific!"
Palin: Specific is terrific. Specific is terrific.
She shuffles her index cards and the loudspeakers intone..."The capital of Iran is...Tehran. Teh...ran."
Palin: Oooooh. They sound so much the same! Iran, Tehran. That's why I can't remember!
As McCain, hands on hips, cape waving, enters the auditorium.
McCain: Sarah.
Palin: Mr. McCain!
Both of their "I"s blink briefly.
McCain: Sarah, I want you to watch the Fortress until I return. I have a very important mission. About Wall Street.Both of their "I"s blink briefly.
Palin (to adviser): But I thought Mr. Reagan told Mr. Gorbachev to 'tear down that wall!'
Adviser slowly shakes head.
Palin (to McCain): But...can't I come on this mission, Mr. McCain? Please? I just know I could help!
McCain: Well, I think that a largely unprepared economic novice, struggling to comprehend concepts that are confounding the most experienced and educated authorities in the area...
Both McCain's and Palin's "I"s blink brightly.
McCain: ...Is just what this market needs! Let's go, Sarah! To the rescue!
Sarah: To the rescue, Mr. McCain!
NEXT EPISODE: The Evil Katie-Woman endangers Palin with a hypnotic confusion device...Questions! Can Sarah resist their terrible power?
Coming this week! On...
The Impulsively Unreflective Duo!
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/impulsively-unreflective-duo-incrisis.html
September 29, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that Texas is closer than most national pundits may think.
Except for the rarely-seen Kerry-Edwards bumper sticker in '04, I haven't any Demo bumper stickers/lawn signs in Texas since I moved here in '87.
I see plenty this round. The state may not go blue, but I think there will be pick ups in congress, and maybe with some help from DNC/Obama, Cornyns senate seat. He isn't well thought of, but has high name recognition by those who don't follow too closely..
September 29, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's 38 electoral deficit is going to be very hard to erase, especially since he's trending down.
Obama has played this much like he did the primaries, paying attention to what really matters, delegates and the electoral college, rather than national polls.
Lovin it!
September 30, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with those Texans who hope to see Democrats pick up a majority in the Texas House of Representatives. Current (and temporary) Speaker Tom Craddick has crewed us over for far too long.
A look at the Democratic primary turnout gives one hope that those people -- and others -- will vote in the general election and election Rick Noriega to replace Bush toady John Cornyn in the U. S. Senate.
The Obama campaign has field workers all across the Lone Star State and they will make a BIG difference on election day.
Early voting in Texas is October 20-31.
September 30, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Err...ELECT Rick Noriega....
September 30, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The polls may be behind in what swing states may be leaning Obama's way, or in what "leaning" states are already in the bag. But right now, I don't care that they're insisting on showing this as a horse race.
First, they may not be wrong.
Second, even if they are, and Obama's much further ahead, this only helps the cause.
I Obama supporters (or tempted undecideds)think that the race is close, they will keep doing what needs to be done to get Obama elected. The phone banks, the door-knockers, the monetary donations.
If this were showing as a lock-up right now, people may be tempted to slack off on their efforts, or to even not show up on election day, figuring that enough other folks will be voting, so that it doesn't matter what they do. Too much of that will kill Obama in the election.
So, let them keep under-reporting the poll results, if that's what they're doing. It'll keep us all hungry to make it happen in November.
September 30, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's probably due to them using the same numbers that Brokaw used on Meet the Press.
September 30, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The economic meltdown helped refocus america on the issues, but to say that is the reason O is so close in Indiana or NC or FL is a farse in itself. It's called a sensational ground game and a message that sticks.
September 30, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink