The Mystery Of McCain's Walter Reed Backdrop
As many of you know, one of the odder aspects of McCain's speech last night was the image of an unidentified mansion-like building on the big screen in the background behind him.
The image first appeared behind McCain around a minute into his speech, and stayed up for four or five minutes. It then faded out and was replaced by a plain blue background with an American flag.
So what was the mansion? TPM readers dug into the mystery and discovered that it looks like the Walter Reed Middle School in North Holllywood, California. And it turns out that this is exactly what the image was.
TPM's Kate Klonick just got off the phone with an official at the school who confirmed this. "We didn't know anything about it until it showed up last night," Cathy McLaughlin, the school's office technician, told Klonick. She confirmed that multiple media outlets have been calling and that a statement would be forthcoming from the school.
There was nothing particular in that stretch of McCain's speech that would explain why this particular image was used.
So what happened? A number of TPM readers have suggested a possible explanation: The McCain team actually wanted to use imagery of Walter Reed Medical Center in the background. But someone pulled up this image instead.
We're working to find out exactly what happened. Stay tuned.
Late Update: The school raps McCain for using image without permission.
Late Late Update: The story hits CNN and MSNBC.















Ah, the cost-effectiveness of subcontracting IT to the lowest bidder.. was it arranged by Mitt?
September 5, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, this is just what mavericks do. On the maverick scale, this registers at 9.5, just above Palin (9.0) and just below his voting record (10.0). That green screen is maverick I can believe in.
September 5, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
My friends.
September 5, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Probably to a subsidiary of Halliburton.
September 5, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
probably to a subsidiary of Halliburton.
September 5, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was a no-bid contract.
September 5, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
BlackWater Media & Security Services?
September 5, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a recollection from the speech that the image of the school was a moving image rather than a static photo...I seem to recall a person walking or something. And yes, I could be completely mistaken. (I didn't "enjoy" the speech enough to go back and watch again!)
If my recollection is accurate, wouldn't that mean someone had to go out and film or video the location? Is there really stock video of a middle school?
September 5, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, since TPM posted the point in the speech where the building appears, I watched that spot. And it definitely appears to me that there is movement on the steps of the building.
So, my question is again, who shot the footage? I'm not defending them, but if someone from the campaign asked for that footage, there has to be some "other" explanation for why it was used.
One other commenter mentioned this is certainly taking discussion away from the woeful speech itself, but I can't believe they are that clever to have planned it this way--much easier to just write a better speech.
September 5, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, since TPM posted the point in the speech where the building appears, I watched that spot. And it definitely appears to me that there is movement on the steps of the building.
So, my question is again, who shot the footage? I'm not defending them, but if someone from the campaign asked for that footage, there has to be some "other" explanation for why it was used.
One other commenter mentioned this is certainly taking discussion away from the woeful speech itself, but I can't believe they are that clever to have planned it this way--much easier to just write a better speech.
September 5, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that they didn't even know what the image was, leads me to believe that they surely did not obtain copyright permission to use the image or footage.
ok, maybe most people don't care about copyright law anymore, but it is still federal law.
How 'bout a criminal investigation?
September 5, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, it looks like they vet their pictures about as well as they vet their VP picks. I sure hope when they campaign in Florida, neither of them says they enjoy water sports.
September 5, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
They actually said they don't enjoy water sports?
This is really juvenile, but LOLOLOLOL.
September 5, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Totally misread your post - why can't we edit?!
That would be an epic gaffe, though. Tee hee.
September 5, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
What does it say about John McCain that he either:
A. Was OK with having a giant lime green lawn behind him during his speech -- the lawn of a mansion-like home, no less. Given the ease with which the national audience had been primed to assume that this might well be a photo of one of the McCains' many homes, this seems unlikely.
So its more likely B: he is so hands off about the messaging and craft of his own campaign that he never bothered to see what the giant picture projected behind him during the most important speech of his candidacy was going to be.
This is his full-time job, campaigning to be President. If this isn't the sort of detail he's aware of and controlling, what is he doing? What else would he delegate to incompetents, given the job of President?
Of course, the same applies to every member of his senior staff...
September 5, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the GOP jumped the shark long ago with its "mission accomplished" banner.
But still, this shows incredibly bad planning and forethought. In many ways it is a perfect metaphor for the Republican party policies.
September 5, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't be too harsh ... the guy needs his afternoon naps.
~ Jess
September 5, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain strikes me as lazy.
He doesn't know how to use a computer and doesn't have the intellectual curiosity to explore the web. How can anyone who professes to care about the country and the world, be so uninvolved in the most revolutionary trend in modern history?
The prospect of McC being elected president is becoming more alarming by the day.
September 5, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
"This is his full-time job, campaigning to be President."
Not so much, apparently. In fact, he had so much free time on his hands during the convention run-up to the speech, that he was able to actually head out to the airport and personally greet young Levi Johnston, the prospective groom of unmarried, underaged Bristol Palin, and the reported father of her child.
Um, okay: dumb question. Why would you want to draw attention to this inconsistency—or, at least an outcome inconsistent with the longtime public claims of your anointed running mate about abstinence, contraception and pre-marital sexual relations—by dropping everything your doing to greet the arriving high school dropout and avowed 'kick-ass' character?
These people are beyond redemption. All of them, particularly Senator McCain.
September 5, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
"This is his full-time job, campaigning to be President."
Not so much, apparently. In fact, he had so much free time on his hands during the convention run-up to the speech, that he was able to actually head out to the airport and personally greet young Levi Johnston, the prospective groom of unmarried, underaged Bristol Palin, and the reported father of her child.
Um, okay: dumb question… Why would you want to draw attention to this inconsistency—or, at least an outcome inconsistent with the longtime public claims of your anointed running mate about abstinence, contraception and pre-marital sexual relations—by dropping everything you're doing to greet the arriving high school dropout and avowed 'kick-ass' character?
These people are beyond redemption. All of them, particularly Senator McCain.
September 5, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Off-topic, but Andrew Sullivan is reporting that Todd Palin's ex-business partner has filed an emergency motion to seal his divorce papers. Who cares, right? Well, he's the guy Sarah Palin allegedly had an affair with.
I'm sympathetic to the guy, and I don't blame him for wanting to seal the records, because there will be personal stuff in there -- such as net worth at the time of the divorce -- that -- if it were me -- I wouldn't want broadcast around the world.
Still, it has the potential to be very entertaining.
September 5, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Enquiring minds want to know.
September 5, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I'm sure the National Enquirer has figured out, if there is anything in these divorce papers that names Palin as the (ex)husband's mistress, the ex-wife is the place to turn to next.
I'm guessing she might be willing to spill the beans. Unless, of course, Cindy McCain has spent some of her vast fortune to shut her up. (I'm sure she spent plenty just getting John's disgruntled kids from marriage #1 up on stage last night)
PEACE
September 5, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
who 'effing cares.
What I want to know why John McCain is sending such a huge dog whistle to the Hollywood elites.
Also the second background during McCain's speech was sort of like a cornfield or farm scene. it was green with moving yellow sploches. Very distracting to have moving things behind the speaker and yellow and green were not very flattering. We should do some research. Maybe it will turn out to have been from Alberta.
I think it's amusing that it took the message guys like 15 minutes to finally break into the control booth, throttle the operator and put up the single, sad flag pole, in a a pale blue sky.
September 5, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
WHERE IS SARAH PALIN?
Why is she hiding?
It is unacceptable that a major candidate, unknown to the country, would run and hide from the press for what appears to be a whole week.
Why does she run?
Because she's dumb.
And a day, a week, a month of breifings is not going to change a life of disconnected self-interest.
Last weekend, the blogs vetted Sarah Palin. This week, I move we call out Sarah Palin and the GOP for the cowards they are. The People have every right to question her NOW. There are only 60 days left.
WHERE IS SARAH PALIN?
tick tock tick tock
September 5, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Enquiring minds want to know.
September 5, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes we do
WHERE HAVE THEY SEQUESTERED THEIR VEEP?
WHERE IS SARAH PALIN?
September 5, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep her invisible - the more visibility she gets, the more energy for the Republican base = higher turnout.
Of course the longer she's sequestered, the more time she'll have to practice her talking points, but I say let her stay out of sight
September 5, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
How presumptuous of Pit Bull, already behaving as a VP, hiding at some undisclosed location.
September 5, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is hiding because she doesn't want to answer questions.
I'm assuming one of the questions she doesn't want to answer is, "Sarah, did you sleep with your husband's ex-partner?"
I'm sure there is nothing to this story. I mean, McCain had her vetted, right? I'm sure all of this came out in the vetting process, right?
September 5, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe yes, maybe no.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-AiqGC0buo
September 5, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure the GOP will tell us that they just wanted to showcase middle America and that liberals are showing that they have a natural elite bias against small Alaskan towns, former POWs, pregnant teens, and elementary schools.
September 5, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only explanation that makes any sense at all and I'm sure that's what happened.
And josh's take on it is just right - the GOP has limited resources this time around and they are spending the whole thing to bring Sarah Palin up to some kind of possible ability to run for this position.
September 5, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which basically sounds like its amateur hour over there. These guys used to be tremendous at stage craft. Now they can't plan a convention. They want to run the country. Ugh.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
September 5, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
End result: many minutes of McCain in front of a green or blue screen, giving video satirists plenty of material to work with.
It sorta made sense from the audience point of view but obviously, nobody thought about how it would look on TV.
If it was supposed to convey the town hall metaphor, it failed.
September 5, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Andrew Sullivan is reporting that Todd Palin's former business partner has filed an emergency motion to have his divorce papers sealed.
Of course he can claim that he just doesn't want folks nosing though his private life. But the insinuation will be that Sarah Palin is mentioned in them by his wife at the time.
September 5, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder how much cash the Enquirer is dangling in front of this guy's ex-wife right now?
September 5, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL! They can't tell the difference between a middle school and Walter Reed Medical Center??
How patriotic. Maybe they were funding the middle school all along, which could explain why the Medical Center went to ruins.
Thanks for looking out for us Republicans!
September 5, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since neither McCain nor anyone working for him has ever visited the wounded troops at Walter Reed, they wouldn't have a clue as to what it looks like.
It does have a big lawn, though, but rather an "East Coast" feel [it's in DC] as opposed to that West Coast, California look.
September 5, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any word on whether the allegations that Sarah "Holier than thou" Palin cheated with her husband's business partner are true?
Per Andrew Sullivan Todd's partner and his ex wife are trying to seal the divorce records.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/here-we-go.html
Here is a rundown of the could-be-scandal:
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/uselection,0,sarah-palin-affair-big-media-stays-quiet-as-lover-named,43515
September 5, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sully is forcing me to take back eveyr bad thing I've ever said about him.
He's bending over backwards (ha ha) to redeem himself after standing up for being a gay Catholic Repug and pro-war - which is such a contradiction in terms I have held it against him for years now.
Well, thanks, Sully. Good damn work and you have totally undone the damage you did as far as I'm concerned.
September 5, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I only really started reading Sullivan at the beginning of the primary season, so I never knew the old pro-Bush version. So when you'd always trash him I really never understood it. But I love him now.
September 5, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was why - Sully made a fool of himself at the start of the war and for about 2 years into it - he was a hawk.
And pro-Bush after 9-11. He is one of those who freaked fucking out on 9-11.
Like Richard Cohen who has become incoherent.
September 5, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
His blog has been absolutely indispensible during this election.
Like you, Tena, I was really upset about his war stance but he has since apologized and come to admit what a farce it has been. In addition, he's been way out in front of everyone on the torture issue.
September 5, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just to clarify...I am talking about Sullivan, not Cohen. :-)
September 5, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay Tena, let's strap on our tinfoil hats for a second.
If the national enquirer is right (big if, but after John Edwards I'm at least willing to tolerate the thought) and Sarah had an affair, when did she have it? This is important because the Palin women seem to be so overly fertile I would be wary of being around them in a swim suit. So are all of the Palin kids actually Palin kids? Do we have a "baby daddy" situation?
Now normally I would avoid such things, but this is a woman who wants to take away a woman's right to choose, thinks abstinence only sex education is the way to go (why not, it worked for Bristol, right?), thinks Intelligent Design should be taught next to evolution and wants to ban books.
If she is full of shit and doesn't practice what she preaches we, the American People, should know.
September 5, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed totally and lots and lots of questions are raised by every bit of this.
And what's more the GOP knows it, and they are scrambling to trry to keep people from looking at her with any scrutiny at all.
September 5, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I say let them scramble, the harder they try to hide the truth the harder the press will push.
And having grown up in small town Alaska trust me when I tell you people will talk, it is only a matter of time.
September 5, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotta tread lightly here. Could easily be accused of a sexist double standard for only objecting to adultry by women candidates.
...OTOH, she wasn't a POW,
LK
September 5, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just screams competence, doesn't it?
If they can't tell a military hospital from a middle school, how will they be able to keep world leaders straight?
McCain: I'd like to welcome Vladimir Putin to the White House...
Visitor: Uhh, Mr. President? My name is Stan Putin, owner of Blue Bell Dry Cleaners in Canton, Ohio...
McCain: Oh.
September 5, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I also noticed they had an image of Giuliani in the 9/11 tribute, but that oddly enough the one of Bush is missing. Of course, talking about this must mean that I don't respect or love my country. I should just remember the tragedy and understand that only Republican's truly appreciate it.
September 5, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
And this is a headline story, why?
September 5, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because it is indicative of bigger problems the GOP has.
September 5, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fair enough; I just reckon there are far better stories to demonstrate this.
September 5, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's your problem.
It's funny. Very very funny.
And Hollywood of all places.
What, they couldn't find actual town hall from McCain's favorite place on earth--New Hampshire.
And there is something fishy about the Walter reed thing. Have you seen a picture of that building? Why would they ever choose that?
September 5, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, for clarification purposes, people should know that this is NOT Hollywood. It's NORTH Hollywood, which is a valley, and worlds away.
It's my alma mater, and although it is a beautiful WPA building, we never thought much of it.
So don't get the Hollywood elite image. The school is probably 70% minority, with most of those being Latinos.
It is a great school, but not an elite one.
September 5, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not like this is the NY Times.
Did you watch the speach last night? When I saw this building my thoughts went like this:
1) What the heck is that building?
2) Is it part of the White House? No, I've seen the White House and that is no White House.
3) Is it one of McCain's mansions? Could be, there are so many it is hard to keep track of them all.
So yes, in that McCain made it a topic of conversation by making it a backdrop it is worthy of conversation.
Does it prove anything other than the incompentence of Team Mr. Cindy McCain? No, but it is amusing.
September 5, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why would they have used Walter Reed Medical Center at the beginning of the speech? I think it was just canned footage of "Americana". While this makes a funny story, I don't buy it.
September 5, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come on, folks. Is this really that big of a deal? So some IT douche (I can call him a douche since I'm an IT person too :D) stupidly put the wrong building up as a backdrop...why is this McCain's fault (assuming this is what happened)? Does he need to micro manage down to that level of details?
I think focusing this much on it comes across as being rather juvenile. Note: I'm not a GOP troll. I'm with Obama all the way.
September 5, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
JoshH, that is what 9th level bloggers are supposed to do. We dissect the minutia while the upper levels stick to the bigger stories.
More than once, this dissecton of minutia has opened up a can juicy of worms and offered up more than one can of online whoop-ass, that the upper echelons have turned into headlines with serious veracity.
Viva la blogs!
September 5, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it possible that the middle school photo was there to synch up with McCain's comments on the public school system?
September 5, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
If that was their intent, then why not choose something that actually looked like a school instead of a vacation villa?
September 5, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really only started reading Sullivan at the beginning of this primary season, so I never knew the pro-Bush version that you hated so much. But I do love this version.
September 5, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somehow I got into my head the refrain from the song Yellow Submarine... Sea of Green Sea of Green...
This has to be one of the greatest of all time disasters of any political convention I've ever seen (since 68).
They're all for service and veterans and all that but don't take the time to know what Walter Reed looks like?
And when they finally got the graphic down off the screen they went with nothing at all... I guess to match the creativity of the speech itself.
McCain nailed it last night - several times right into his political coffin.
September 5, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps the picture of Walter Reed Middle School was supposed to be displayed when McCain was talking about parents having a "choice" of where to send their kids to school (he would not use the term "vouchers"). This does look like a nice place after all. No, really, this is obviously a major screw-up and the picture they wanted was Walter Reed Medical Center. But, even had they used the correct picture, the question is Why? I don't recall a reference to WRMC in that part of the speech; who would know the buildings without talking about WRMC; and why talk about such a Republican-caused embarrassment anyway? Or, perhaps, this is just another diversion to keep the media from talking about the Republicans' woeful lack of interest in the issues that should be important.
September 5, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
The more-patriotic-than-thou campaign cannot even recognize Walter Reed Medical Center, even when they attempt to use the wounded troops as a photo-op.
September 5, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has McLame ever visited troops in Walter Reed?
September 5, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought McCain was just pimpin' one of Cindy's cribs. While the image was up, he waaas talking about how great she is.
September 5, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
The same speech....lmao she is reading it off a script...yeh the urban legend that she "surged" through the teleprompter...somehwere Pinocchio giggled. Mccain is making this all about alin wow bad, bad bad tactic. Easy to refute, just HS simple "John Mccain wants us all to vote for Sara Palin, why?" "The answer is easy a Man running for president has nothing but much as he wants it to be Sara Palin isnt running for President, he is>"
September 5, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was supposed to be a picture of the middle class. Honest mistake.
September 5, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was a perfect comment. Thanks for the laugh!
September 5, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
This doesn't surprise me after seeing the President Ford tribute on Tuesday(?). It was obviously an old video they didn't even bother to dust off or preview. It said it has been "over 2 decades since Gerald Ford called the White House home." Ummm... more like 3 decades now.
Has anyone seen figures about how much the two conventions cost? I remember a month ago reading a story about fundraising for them. It said the RNC had a budget that was $10-20 million more than the DNC. After watching both, I think the DNC got a lot more for their money. Where did all that money go in the RNC? I know what party I'll trust my tax dollars with.
September 5, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
let's assume for the sake of discussion that McCain actually intended to use the Walter Reed Medical Center as the background prop for his acceptance speech
if so, doesn't that sort of violate the spirit (if not the letter) of the Hatch Act?
(the Hatch Act basically says thou shall not use Federal facilities for conducting partisan activities)?
but I doubt anyone will pursue that issue (especially given that Bush is also getting a pass on delivering his video speech direct from the White House)
apparently, it's okay for McCain and Bush to ignore the Hatch Act but not VP Gore (who got roasted for making fund raising calls from the wrong room and/or using the wrong phone)
September 5, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes and the Hatch Act has been raised before with regard to the Repugs.
Sure has.
September 5, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well that explains where all the funding went...
September 5, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
...would the REAL Walter Reed please stand up?
Just like McCain's two Johnny's , there's apparently more than one Walter Reed building out there on the internets..
They need to get their toobz straight!
Imcompetence is so blatantly systemic in the Republicn party, how could anyone want to vote for one of them?
I agree, they vetted this slide show about as well as they vetted Palin.
Apparently only Bush's base was fooled again;
http://www.pollster.com/blogs/omero_the_palin_effect_prelimi.php
September 5, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain: "Middle School? No wonder I didn't see any wounded veterans on my last visit."
September 5, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn kids get off my playground!
September 5, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mediocrity, incompetence redux. but who can tell the difference? McCain 894/899, with his soul mate-went to 5 colleges to get one degree but will say exactly what she is told without bating an eye.
Heck of a job George McCain!
September 5, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a public middle school? Wow, their funding must be much higher than here in Washington State, if a public middle school is this darn fancy, what the heck do we need school vouchers for? This is what I see as a middle school when i look in my neighbhorhood.
September 5, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt the McCain camp even recognized there was a problem. First of all, why would they bring up the Walter Reed hospital anyway? To remind everyone how the chickenhawks sent kids off to war and then cut funding for them when they come home. Sheesh.
McCain's vp selection process:
http://tinyurl.com/5zr47h
September 5, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
IT WAS NOT A MISTAKE!!! The McCain campaign thoroughly vetted the images presented on the display during the speech and was aware in advance that it was actually a middle school.
September 5, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good one!
September 5, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Showing the wrong photograph during the critically-important address of your party's presidential nominee is Change I Can Get Behind (Trade Mark pending)
September 5, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The green screen really enhanced the yellow of his teeth.
Suggestion: Crest White Strips.
September 5, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
ABC News is straight-out lying on this story. Here's the link: (Sorry if it isn't formatted right) Article
Here's the lie in the article:
I call bullsh*t! You can't use Google to find what an image is. You can find an image of "Walter Reed school/hospital/whatever", but you can't show Google a picture of a building and ask "what is it?"
They're plagiarizing from TPM without attribution. And they know it.
September 5, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't been able to track back to the page where I read it, but it turns out that Todd Palin is often referred to as the "shadow governor". He apparently has his hands in the day-to-day nitty gritty of his spouse's administration, despite being a private citizen. His former business partner found out that Todd had viewed his records, (which he had released for divorce proceedings), and passed the information along for political purposes.
The rush to re-seal the records is as much a response to Mr. Palin's crude political indiscretions as anything else.
September 5, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry for the double post.
September 5, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
ABC News is straight-out lying on this story. Here's the link: (Sorry if it isn't formatted right) Article
Here's the lie in the article:
I call bullsh*t! You can't use Google to find what an image is. You can find an image of "Walter Reed school/hospital/whatever", but you can't show Google a picture of a building and ask "what is it?"
They're plagiarizing from TPM without attribution. And they know it.
September 5, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
ABC News is straight-out lying on this story. Here's the link: (Sorry if it isn't formatted right) Article
Here's the lie in the article:
I call bullsh*t! You can't use Google to find what an image is. You can find an image of "Walter Reed school/hospital/whatever", but you can't show Google a picture of a building and ask "what is it?"
They're plagiarizing from TPM without attribution. And they know it.
September 5, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm... and the, uh... triple.
:-(
September 5, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sources say that the middle-school photo was indeed a mistake. Turns out the photo they MEANT to put up was one of an antebellum Southern plantation mansion, complete with columns and Miss Maybelle sippin mint juleps in a rocking chair on the front porch. McGrampy was to have done a quick costume change and come out dressed in Colonel Sanders duds, singing and dancing a soft-shoe number in a gala tribute to Old Fashioned Culture and Family Values. Sadly, the number was canned because of the photo screw-up.
September 5, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a parent of a 6th grader at Walter Reed Middle School, I probably know more than anyone here. This is a photo of the main building that was built in the 1930's. It is in Studio City, but many still call it North Hollywood which lies on the other side of the Santa Monica Mountains about five miles north of Hollywood proper. North Hollywood is perceived as a bit run down and the school sits in the middle of a middle class to upper middle class enclave of Studio City and Valley Village where the average house price is anywhere from 750K t 900K - and yes that is middle class by L.A. standards.
Until this year, it had a large population stretching from the poorer parts of the valley into Studio City. With new school construction changing the boundaries, it's now on a traditional calendar with a smaller population. It hosts three small learning acadamies which benefit from well off parents who fundraise and underwrite programs like a Latin elective and an eighth grade trip to the East Coast. The school epitomizes the haves and the have nots in L.A. public schools. The poor neighborhood's have difficult learning environments while the well off areas operate in a positive cycle of college-driven students, demanding parents and motivated teachers and administrators. Even within the school, the general ed kids rarely interact with the academy kids. Ironically, it is an example of a high performing public school where quite a few parents could afford to send their kids to a $20,000 a year private school.
September 5, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
My son is a 7th Grader at Reed, and while the novelty and humor of this doesn't escape me, and my husband is the one who reported it to the Huffington Post, I hate to see that the school is being deluged with media requests.
My perception of Reed is not quite as rosy as Wahoo's - my son is in a Technology Academy with woefully outdated computers and software, the school is actually still overcrowded - whereas last year we had 1900 students on a 3 track system, meaning 1200 students at a given time - we now have a (not) "reduced" population of 1600 students.
I believe Reed is still a Title 1 school (where at least 40 percent of the children in the school attendance area are from low-income families or at least 40 percent of the student enrollment are from low-income families are eligible to receive federal Title I funds.)
If someone wants to send a news crew to Reed to see how a diverse, overcrowded, aging Middle School in a suburban area with a population of kids from wildly disparate economic circumstances functions, and talk about what could be done to help our schools in a concrete, let's-dump-No Child-Left-Behind way, I'm all for it.
I can assure you that not a dime has gone to Walter Reed Middle School that should have gone to the hospital. I don't even think we have a nurse...
September 5, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's really simple; compare the size of Walter Reed Middle School with the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. It's obvious, we have so few wounded vets they can be comfortably treated in this relatively tiny building. Wait till you see the tiny shed they will squeeze the War on Iraq and the "War on Terror" into.
McCain-Palin can offer America absolution, amnesia and "retro-active immunity" for the last seven years. From everything I have seen, that is America's most intense desire at this moment. To forget about everything that's happened since 9-11-01, and turn it into a fairy tale or an adventure movie. McCain-Palin can offer this, and how.
Obama-Biden cannot offer this, nor will the Repugs let them if they try. This gives the Repubs a tremendous advantage. A good forgetting, by means of flushing or distration of the last seven years is the most powerful tool in politics today in America, and Obama-Biden ain't got it.
September 5, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone identified the source of the image in question? Or any of the other images used as backdrops?
Because I'd be willing to bet that the campaign didn't license the imagery, just as they haven't been licensing the music they've been using.
Find the rights owners and have them issue DMCA takedown orders on all on-line pictures and video of the speech. Demand payment from all of the networks which aired the footage. And have them sue the McCain campaign.
Have them be the same kind of copyright-defending assholes as the Republicans that run the RIAA.
September 5, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's no likely claim against the networks; it falls under the 'news reporting' fair use exception. The only likely claim would be against the RNC as organizers of the event, and I'd be surprised if the venue didn't have a blanket license for public performance which covered them, at least for music.
For images and other footage, who knows. News networks are probably still safe, by the same reasoning.
September 5, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is no blanket license for images. Period.
And it's unlikely that the facility's music license would cover the RNC. If the arena was hosting a tradeshow, the individual exhibitors would definitely not be covered, so I don't see how it would be different for the RNC (other than via IOKIYAR).
The weak link is ISPs hosting any web video of the event. They have DMCA obligations to take down any content when notified by the rights holder. You're right that news orgs probably get a pass, but YouTube etc. aren't news orgs.
September 5, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is this little wrinkle. My wife is a teacher at a feeder elementary school down the street, and she just told me this morning that a McCain relative is enrolled in her school.
September 5, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh come on, this is at least a 6th - 7th level blog! ;-) Actually I think a little higher, given the work these guys have done on the US attorneys scandal.
September 5, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama needsd to stress that he is the one who voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill and that McCain voted against it. He needs to stress that he is a much bigger lightweight empty suit than Sarah Palin. He needs to stress that he is the one that is friends with Racists like Rev Wright, Terrorists like William Ayers, and Slumlords like Rezco. He needa to point out that while facing a true American Military hero he did not serve in the Armed Forces and has a bitchy wife that was not proud of America until people started fawning all over her cult leader husband.
September 5, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama needsd to stress that he is the one who voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill and that McCain voted against it. He needs to stress that he is a much bigger lightweight empty suit than Sarah Palin. He needs to stress that he is the one that is friends with Racists like Rev Wright, Terrorists like William Ayers, and Slumlords like Rezco. He needa to point out that while facing a true American Military hero he did not serve in the Armed Forces and has a bitchy wife that was not proud of America until people started fawning all over her cult leader husband.
September 5, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama needsd to stress that he is the one who voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill and that McCain voted against it. He needs to stress that he is a much bigger lightweight empty suit than Sarah Palin. He needs to stress that he is the one that is friends with Racists like Rev Wright, Terrorists like William Ayers, and Slumlords like Rezco. He needa to point out that while facing a true American Military hero he did not serve in the Armed Forces and has a bitchy wife that was not proud of America until people started fawning all over her cult leader husband.
September 5, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama needsd to stress that he is the one who voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill and that McCain voted against it. He needs to stress that he is a much bigger lightweight empty suit than Sarah Palin. He needs to stress that he is the one that is friends with Racists like Rev Wright, Terrorists like William Ayers, and Slumlords like Rezco. He needa to point out that while facing a true American Military hero he did not serve in the Armed Forces and has a bitchy wife that was not proud of America until people started fawning all over her cult leader husband.
September 5, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
And here is another wrinkle. My wife is a teacher at a feeder elementary school right down the street. She told me this morning that a McCain relative is enrolled there.
September 5, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama needsd to stress that he is the one who voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill and that McCain voted against it. He needs to stress that he is a much bigger lightweight empty suit than Sarah Palin. He needs to stress that he is the one that is friends with Racists like Rev Wright, Terrorists like William Ayers, and Slumlords like Rezco. He needa to point out that while facing a true American Military hero he did not serve in the Armed Forces and has a bitchy wife that was not proud of America until people started fawning all over her cult leader husband.
September 5, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama needsd to stress that he is the one who voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill and that McCain voted against it. He needs to stress that he is a much bigger lightweight empty suit than Sarah Palin. He needs to stress that he is the one that is friends with Racists like Rev Wright, Terrorists like William Ayers, and Slumlords like Rezco. He needa to point out that while facing a true American Military hero he did not serve in the Armed Forces and has a bitchy wife that was not proud of America until people started fawning all over her cult leader husband.
September 5, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, "Dem BillC": Post it another half-dozen times or so; I think we may have missed it.
September 5, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't seen anyone else say it, so I will:
EPIC FAIL
September 5, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to reiterate what DaleD says above: this is not a photo image, it is a video. You can clearly see someone walking up the steps of the school at about 3:48 in McCain's speech. Is there really stock video of this middle school? If not, then someone on the campaign shot the video, and that pretty much shoots down the "IT screwup" story, doesn't it?
September 5, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't seen anyone else say it, so I will:
EPIC FAIL
September 5, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to reiterate what DaleD says above: this is not a photo image, it is a video. You can clearly see someone walking up the steps of the school at about 3:48 in McCain's speech. Is there really stock video of this middle school? If not, then someone on the campaign shot the video, and that pretty much shoots down the "IT screwup" story, doesn't it?
September 5, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, for the double post. The first one returned an error.
September 5, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ohhhhh, I thought he was just trying to get Stephen Colbert to do another green screen challenge to make McCain more interesting.
That google, so hard to use!
September 5, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder what the business partners wife has to say about this.
Yes, I am presuming she had the affair (if it occurred) with the husband, but with the republicans/christianists, you never know.
September 5, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I thought it was an old folks home.
September 5, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
"This is his full-time job, campaigning to be President."
Not so much, apparently. In fact, he had so much free time on his hands during the convention run-up to the speech, that he was able to actually head out to the airport and personally greet young Levi Johnston, the prospective groom of unmarried, underaged Bristol Palin, and the reported father of her child.
Um, okay: dumb question… Why would you want to draw attention to this inconsistency—or, at least an outcome inconsistent with the longtime public claims of your anointed running mate about abstinence, contraception and pre-marital sexual relations—by dropping everything you're doing to greet the arriving high school dropout and avowed 'kick-ass' character?
These people are beyond redemption. All of them, particularly Senator McCain.
September 5, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I thought it was an old folks home.
September 5, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate to say it, but that's a Walter Mondale-level fuck-up. I'll never forget on the day Daylight Savings changed, Mondale ended up with an extra hour on his schedule, and the Times ran a front-page photo of him just hanging out out in front of the hotel he was at. Not good,
September 5, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain got lucky. The first version of the picture was a Walter Reade movie theater. So that had to scramble to get a Walter Reed image, and the middle school ("Walter Reed M...") was the best they could do on short notice.
September 5, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain got lucky. The first version of the picture was a Walter Reade movie theater. So they had to scramble to get a Walter Reed image, and the middle school ("Walter Reed M...") was the best they could do on short notice.
September 5, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I meant to do that!
September 5, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is why Republicans are not like you and me: when they are told that they are looking at Walter Reed Hospital, they stfu and believe it. They only get upset when people question their belief. They believe, and that's all that matters!
September 5, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is so funny! After watching the McCain/McSame speech and having Sarah Palin make my skin crawl, I needed a good laugh. These guys can't do anything right. Why are they taken seriously at all?
September 5, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has the McCain campaign offered ANY justification as to why they had the Jr. High on the screen?
September 5, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
And better yet, it was used as the backdrop for Jimmy Smits' character's announcement on 'The West Wing!' I love it!
September 5, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
And better yet, it was used as the backdrop for Jimmy Smits' character's announcement on 'The West Wing!' I love it!
September 5, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Tell me now what more do you need
take me to Walter Reed tonight
Baby, I've lost the will for fighting
over everything"
-Michael Penn
September 5, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Walter Reed?
I thought it was one of the many McCain mansions!!
September 5, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was it a mistake -or just faking it? How many Americans would have seen or recognize the real Walter Reed Medical Centre?
What the backdrop shows is a beautiful building, lush lawns -nice place for rehabilitation. So what were all those horrible 'liberal' stories about poor care of vets?
September 5, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was it a mistake -or just a fake ? How many Americans would have seen or recognize the real Walter Reed Medical Centre?
What the backdrop shows is a beautiful building, lush lawns -perfect place for rehabilitation. So what about all those horrible 'liberal' stories about poor care of vets? See, it just wasn't true!
September 5, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was it a mistake -or just a fake ? How many Americans would have seen or recognize the real Walter Reed Medical Centre?
What the backdrop shows is a beautiful building, lush lawns -perfect place for rehabilitation. So what about all those horrible 'liberal' stories about poor care of vets? See, it just wasn't true!
September 5, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
In case anyone's interested:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Reed
September 5, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
In case anyone's interested:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Reed
September 5, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Catch phrase for the Obama/Biden team on the trail.
"We need to support our veterans at Walter Reed ... and we aren't talking about that middle school in North Hollywood."
September 5, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It could have been worse - the intern could have pulled up this on his Walter Reed search.
September 5, 2008 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
walter reed?
he ought to be disgraced for the walter reed scandal also..
McCain & Veterans' Health Care
McCain Has Repeatedly Voted Against Increasing Funding for Veterans Healthcare to Keep Tax Cuts for the Rich.
John McCain has repeatedly voted to keep intact tax cuts for the rich, rather than provide American veterans with adequate healthcare funding. McCain has repeatedly voted against amendments in the Senate that would have added funding for healthcare services, but eliminated tax cuts for the wealthy. Funding would have covered such important services as improving care at veterans' hospitals, providing mental health services to soldiers with post-traumatic stress disorder and substance abuse problems. [2006 Senate Vote #7, 2/2/06; 2005 Senate Vote #343, 11/17/05; 2003 Senate Vote #74, 3/21/03]
2006: McCain Voted Against Eliminating Increased Fees And
Co-Payments For Veterans Health Care Program By Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes.
In 2006, McCain voted against the Kerry amendment that would eliminate increased fees and co-payments for veterans in the TRICARE health care program by raising the discretionary spending limit by approximately $10 billion. The provisions would have been fully offset by eliminating creating corporate tax breaks. [2006 Senate Vote #67, 3/16/2006]
McCain Stood Out in Opposing Veterans' Healthcare Funding.
McCain was one of only 13 Republicans to vote against an amendment that added over $400 million for inpatient and outpatient care for veterans. [2006 Senate Vote #98, 4/26/06]
McCain Puts Politics Over Vets; Would Rather Be Out Campaigning Than Supporting Our Troops.
McCain missed an important vote this year that supported the funding of the troops in Iraq and guaranteed them adequate medical care upon returning home. [2007 Senate Vote #76, 3/15/07]
McCain Blamed Scandal on Rumsfeld's Management of War.
Days after the story broke, McCain told a group of Georgia legislators that "the fruits of Rumsfeld's policy were on display at Walter Reed military hospital in Washington... It's well chronicled that the war was mismanaged." [Atlanta Journal Constitution, 2/22/2007]
FLASHBACK 2004: McCain Refused To Call For Secretary Rumsfeld's Resignation.
McCain would not call for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation, saying that the President "can have the team that he wants around him." McCain said that he respected Bush's decision to keep Rumsfeld around. McCain said, "I respect the president. The president of the United States was re-elected by a majority of the American people, and I respect his right. And I will work with the president obviously and with the secretary of defense." [MSNBC.com, 12/15/04; CNN.com, 12/5/04]
FLASHBACK 2006: McCain Refused to Join Calls For Rumsfeld's Resignation, Said He Would Work With Rumsfeld.
"But the president has the right and earned the right as the president of the United States to appoint his team," and he has confidence in Secretary Rumsfeld. "I will continue to work with Secretary Rumsfeld as much as I can as long as he is secretary of Defense. We have to, because we need to win this war." [East Valley Tribune, 415/2006; http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/63311 ]April 15, 2006 - 6:13AM
Busy McCain expresses views on Rumsfeld, immigration, Iraq war
Paul Giblin, Tribune
Sen. John McCain joined the ranks of retired generals who have said they have no confidence in Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
September 6, 2008 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink