« McCain Ad Blasts Obama For Ties To Former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson | Home | A Day At The Congressional Races »

McCain Again Says Fannie Mae CEO Advised Obama -- Even Though He Denies It

In a speech today in Green Bay, John McCain kept up with his efforts to grab control of the debate over the economy by hitting Obama's ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

McCain cast himself as the activist reformer on the economy by citing his call for reform at Fannie and Freddie, and again hit Obama by claiming that its former CEO, Frank Raines, advised Obama on housing, even though Raines himself has denied it. From the prepared remarks:

Two years ago, I called for reform of this corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Congress did nothing. The Administration did nothing. Senator Obama did nothing, and actually profited from this system of abuse and scandal. While Fannie and Freddie were working to keep Congress away from their house of cards, Senator Obama was taking their money. He got more, in fact, than any other member of Congress, except for the Democratic chairmen of the committee that oversees them. And while Fannie Mae was betraying the public trust, somehow its former CEO had managed to gain my opponent's trust to the point that Senator Obama actually put him in charge of his vice presidential search.

This CEO, Mr. Johnson, walked off with tens of millions of dollars in salary and bonuses for services rendered to Fannie Mae, even after authorities discovered accounting improprieties that padded his compensation. Another CEO for Fannie Mae, Mr. Raines, has been advising Senator Obama on housing policy. This even after Fannie Mae was found to have committed quote "extensive financial fraud" under his leadership. Like Mr. Johnson, Mr. Raines walked away with tens of millions of dollars.

The hit on Johnson is a rough one for Obama. But the Raines attack is shaping up as (yawn) yet another McCain falsehood. The Associated Press is reporting that Raines actually informed a top McCain adviser a few days ago that he is not an adviser to Obama -- before Raines became a major issue.

McCain's claim that Raines advised Obama is based on a few unsourced lines in The Washington Post, and WaPo is currently mulling a correction. If the paper does correct the record, it'll be fun to watch McCain keep claiming there's a tie. Full McCain remarks after the jump.

Thank you all very much. It's a great pleasure to be introduced by Governor Sarah Palin -- and I can't wait to introduce her to Washington.

If Governor Palin and I are elected in 46 days, we are not going to waste a moment in changing the way Washington does business. And we're going to start where the need for reform is greatest. In short order, we are going to put an end to the reckless conduct, corruption, and unbridled greed that have caused a crisis on Wall Street.

Here and all across our country, people are wondering what exactly is happening on Wall Street. And with good reason, they want to know how their government will meet the crisis. Clear answers are hard to come by in Washington.

As Senator Obama's leader in Congress memorably put it the other day -- and I quote -- "no one knows what to do." Perhaps given that reaction, it shouldn't surprise us that the Congressional leaders of this do-nothing Congress also said that they weren't going to take action until after the election, claiming that it wasn't their fault. I am hopeful that last night's discussions are a sign they have changed their mind and will take action soon. But any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safe guard the life savings of all Americans by protecting our financial system.

There are certainly plenty of places to point fingers, and it may be hard to pinpoint the original event that set it all in motion. But let me give you an educated guess. The financial crisis we're living through today started with the corruption and manipulation of our home mortgage system. At the center of the problem were the lobbyists, politicians, and bureaucrats who succeeded in persuading Congress and the administration to ignore the festering problems at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

These quasi-public corporations lead our housing system down a path where quick profit was placed before sound finance. They institutionalized a system that rewarded forcing mortgages on people who couldn't afford them, while turning around and selling those bad mortgages to the banks that are now going bankrupt. Using money and influence, they prevented reforms that would have curbed their power and limited their ability to damage our economy. And now, as ever, the American taxpayers are left to pay the price for Washington's failure.

Two years ago, I called for reform of this corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Congress did nothing. The Administration did nothing. Senator Obama did nothing, and actually profited from this system of abuse and scandal. While Fannie and Freddie were working to keep Congress away from their house of cards, Senator Obama was taking their money. He got more, in fact, than any other member of Congress, except for the Democratic chairmen of the committee that oversees them. And while Fannie Mae was betraying the public trust, somehow its former CEO had managed to gain my opponent's trust to the point that Senator Obama actually put him in charge of his vice presidential search.

This CEO, Mr. Johnson, walked off with tens of millions of dollars in salary and bonuses for services rendered to Fannie Mae, even after authorities discovered accounting improprieties that padded his compensation. Another CEO for Fannie Mae, Mr. Raines, has been advising Senator Obama on housing policy. This even after Fannie Mae was found to have committed quote "extensive financial fraud" under his leadership. Like Mr. Johnson, Mr. Raines walked away with tens of millions of dollars.

Senator Obama may be taking their advice and he may be taking their money, but in a McCain-Palin administration, there will be no seat for these people at the policy-making table. They won't even get past the front gate at the White House.

My friends, this is the problem with Washington. People like Senator Obama have been too busy gaming the system and haven't ever done a thing to actually challenge the system.

We've heard a lot of words from Senator Obama over the course of this campaign. But maybe just this once he could spare us the lectures, and admit to his own poor judgment in contributing to these problems. The crisis on Wall Street started in the Washington culture of lobbying and influence peddling, and he was square in the middle of it.

The financial services industry -- and there are many honest and honorable people who work in it -- plays a vital role in our economy. Mutual fund companies help Americans save for retirement. Banks and lending companies provide the mortgages that help us buy our homes. Investment firms supply the seed money that helps entrepreneurs create tomorrow's jobs. Insurance companies protect us against unknown risks.

Yet as the financial crisis continues and bailouts and bankruptcies mount, it's clear financial firms have lost the trust of the American people. That trust cannot be regained unless we adopt some fundamental reforms. Government has a clear responsibility to act and to defend the public interest. That is exactly what I intend to do.

First, to deal with the immediate crisis, I will lead in the creation of the Mortgage and Financial Institutions trust -- the MFI. The underlying principle of the MFI or any approach considered by Congress should be to keep people in their homes and safe guard the life savings of all Americans by protecting our financial system and capital markets. This trust will work with the private sector and regulators to identify institutions that are weak and fix them before they become insolvent. The MFI is an early intervention program to help financial institutions avoid bankruptcy, expensive bailouts and damage to their customers. This will get the Treasury and other financial regulatory authorities in a proactive position instead of reacting in a crisis mode to one situation after another.

The MFI will restore investor and market confidence, build sound financial institutions, assist troubled institutions and protect our financial system while minimizing taxpayer exposure. This is an important step, but it is not enough. I will also take the additional actions needed to make sure a crisis like this is never allowed to build and break over the American people again.

Second, I will propose and sign into law reforms to prevent financial firms from concealing their bad practices. An inexcusable lack of financial transparency allowed Wall Street firms to engage in reckless behavior that padded their profits and fattened executive bonuses when times were good, but now imperil the financial security of millions of Americans when their bets turned sour.

So much of the damage to our economy could have been avoided if these practices had been exposed to the light of day. Americans have a right to know when their jobs, pensions, IRAs, investments, and our whole economy are being put at risk by the recklessness of Wall Street. And under my reforms for the financial sector, that fundamental right will be protected.

Third, we need regulatory clarity. The lack of transparency in our financial markets went unnoticed by the regulatory agencies scattered throughout Washington charged with protecting the common good. We've got the SEC, the FDIC, the CFTC, the SIPC, the OCC, the Fed. At best, this confusing assortment of regulators and institutions was egregiously lax in carrying out their responsibilities. At worst, they engaged in the old Washington game of guarding their bureaucratic turf, instead of safeguarding the public interest and protecting investors.

Many in the financial services industry also either forgot or neglected their duty to act ethically and honorably. This shortcoming was aided and abetted by the creation of financial instruments that allowed lenders to escape any responsibility for the risk of their loans. In the past, lenders had to pay a price if they made a bad loan. Today, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac worked with Wall Street to bundle together all these dicey subprime loans and then pushed them off on investors who didn't have the tools of transparency needed to assess or even understand the risk.

The current system promotes confusion, encourages bureaucratic infighting and creates incentives for financial firms to cut corners. We need to enhance regulatory clarity by holding the same financial activity to one regulatory standard. We don't need a dozen federal agencies doing the job badly -- we need the best federal agencies to do the job right.

Fourth, we must ensure that consumers and investors are protected. Our regulatory system must protect consumers and investors by punishing individuals who engage in fraud, break contracts, or lie to customers -- like the predatory lenders who know you can't afford an adjustable rate mortgage, but mislead you into signing one. These actions are criminal and the people who commit them should be behind bars. And corporate governance rules will be reformed so that shareholders have a clear say in determining the pay of CEOs and other senior executives. On my watch, the consequences for corporate abuse will not be more enrichment, but more likely an indictment.

Fifth, in cases where failing companies seek taxpayer bailouts, the Treasury Department will follow consistent policies in deciding whether to guarantee loans. It must have well developed remedies for a financial crisis. With billions of dollars in public money at stake, it will not do to keep making it up as we go along.

Finally, the Federal Reserve should get back to its core business of responsibly managing our money supply and inflation. It needs to get out of the business of bailouts. The Fed needs to return to protecting the purchasing power of the dollar. A strong dollar will reduce energy and food prices. It will stimulate sustainable economic growth and get this economy moving again.

All of these measures will calm and help us to avoid future panics and disasters in the financial markets. But to get through this tough time for America, and to come out stronger, we need a strategy of economic growth. And the massive new tax burden that my opponent plans for the American economy is exactly the wrong answer. His tax increase -- along with the enormous new federal programs he proposes -- are the surest way to turn a recession into a depression. In every respect, the Obama tax hikes would make things even worse for the working people of this country.

I have proposed, and will sign into law, an economic recovery plan for working Americans that is directed to the middle class. It will grow this economy, create millions of jobs and bring opportunity back to Americans. You will get a tax policy that creates family prosperity and allows you to save for the future. I will not raise your taxes on income or investments. And we will simplify the tax code so people can understand it and do their tax returns themselves.

I will give every family a $5,000 credit to buy their own health insurance policy and let them chose their own doctor. This will make insurance affordable to every American.

I will double the child exemption from $3,500 to $7,000 to help families pay for the rising cost of living.

Under my plan, a married couple with two children making $35,000 will get $5,000 to pay for health insurance and additional medical expenses. This family would get another $1,050 from my child exemption. That adds up to over $6,000. That is a lot more than what any hardworking middle class family, gets under the Obama plan.

Business taxes will be cut from the second highest in the world at 35 percent to 25 percent. Tax incentives will spur investment in new plants and equipment. Research and development incentives will keep companies on the cutting edge of their industries. Healthcare costs will diminish. Companies will stop sending jobs overseas to low-cost, low-tax countries and start creating jobs here in America.

I will expand markets for our goods and services. A one in five of all jobs in this country are linked to world trade. In five states alone Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Colorado over 5 million jobs depend on trade. My economic recovery plan will create millions of jobs in America instead of driving them overseas.

I will adopt an "all of the above" energy policy which expands our use of oil, natural gas, clean coal and nuclear facilities. We will embark on a national mission to build an alternative energy base, creating millions of new jobs. We will create the most diversified energy economy in the world. And, I will return to the American economy the $700 billion dollars we send overseas every year to buy oil.

My opponent offers a very different economic future. He has continuously shifted his position on taxes. At the beginning of this campaign he promised to raise taxes on your savings and investments. He said he won't raise taxes for most people but he has voted 94 times in his short Senate career for tax increases and against tax cuts. He said he would only tax the rich, but he voted this year to raise taxes on those making just $42,000. Senator Obama has simply not given Americans good reason to trust him with your tax dollars.

My opponent is against lowering taxes on businesses which are the second highest in the world. He will impose mandated health insurance on businesses that would cost up to $12,000 per employee. He opposes free trade. He also wants to take away the fundamental right of workers to have a secret ballot when voting to be part of a union.

Now is not the time for these destructive policies that will cripple business growth, destroy jobs and hurt the middle class. Now is the time to take action to address this crisis and take action to put our economy back on a path of growth.

Even though Democratic leaders say they don't know what to do, I believe the deep problems afflicting our financial system won't be solved by one political party. There is only one candidate in this race who has a record of reaching across the aisle to work out the bipartisan solutions needed to move our country forward in times of crisis -- and I will bring that same spirit of bipartisan cooperation to the White House. It took members of both parties to get America into this mess, and it will take all of us, working together, to lead the way out.

Thank you.


47 Comments

| Leave a comment

Wasn't Jim Johnson the guy that left the campaign?

user-pic

He left right after starting the veep vetting process.

Question about this line of attack. Since people leave after Palin speaks, is Palin now going to be moved after McCain?

If not, who's going to hear this speech?

And finally, I hope the Obama campaign keep up the attacks on the old guy network that is the McCain campaign...

user-pic

The truth doesn't stop them about anything else, why should this be any different? I have yet to hear them retract any of their previous lies and why should they if the press just plays along or (as others have noted) make false equivalencies.

McCain's claim that Raines advised Obama is based on a few unsourced lines in The Washington Post, and WaPo is currently mulling a correction. If the paper does correct the record, it'll be fun to watch McCain keep claiming there's a tie.

Indeed. It's always fun to watch a politician LIE. Ugh.

http://thepajamapundit.com/

McCain blasting lobbyists is so damn disingenuous - does he actually believe the falsehoods coming out of his mouth? I think he's lost it, I really do. He's willing to flat out lie in major speeches and rallys and doesn't seem to give a damn.

The worst part is that folks at his rallies believe him hook, line and sinker. How can one possibly bust through his unabashed lies?

Johnson left the VP Vetting way back when, Gramm is still working for McCain and will likely be in his cabinet.

You're assuming that people at his rallies are actually listening to what he says.

Obama really needs to blast this fool.

I wonder what the Republicans who still believe in deregulation are feeling right now. McCain has gone regulator/populist right in front of their eyes.

I was listening to George Will the other day and he said many will see he has gone from a supporter of deregulation to a populist overnight and wouldn't support it.

user-pic

The VP selection process? Seriously?

Do they really want to go there?

-- ARG

I really don't think they know where they are going.

user-pic

Nowhere!

Bingo.

Palin/McCain are flailing about. They have no clear focus. When it seems like they're developing one, it turns out to be based on lies, or just contradicts recent past McCain positions.

They have the smell of desperation, of losers, coming off of them.

user-pic

The smell of SULPHUR!

I like the birthday hat picture. It would make for a great ad with the type of corruption McCain would bring to the White House.

user-pic

McShame: Party as the ship of state goes down!

It's mind boggling what McCain is doing, he's basically stealing everything from Obama - first it was poke points from speeches, then it was policy, now it's his whole platform. Basically he sees Obama is winning with what he is saying so he figures "Hey If I say the exact same thing, folks might as well vote for me because I am a POW and he's black".

That seems to sum it up pretty good. And what is probably eating away at McCain is that he is behind and "I am a POW and he's black."

user-pic

Look closely at the two of them. Would you vote for the picture on the left? Vote for the corpse?

I see a new ad...

Another day, another lie from John McCain.

Is John McCain really putting country first when he can not tell the truth to the American people?

Could it be that the truth about John McCain's record of 26 years of pushing deregulation is more damaging that the lies he tells about Barack Obama?

Nobody gives a damn about the candidates' advisors. If Obama sticks to the simple and true message that McCain is a typical deregulation Republican, he wins the economy debate and wins the election. McCain is flailing because he knows this issue is deadly for him.

Throw sh** at the MSM, I mean wall, and see what sticks.

I think that Josh is spot on when he points out that the goal of MSM is to show "balance" even when there is none.

user-pic

Those two photos say it all. McSham looks like a corpse - next to Obama!

Wow. Vetting vice presidential prospects.

What a concept.

Ron Paul on McCain: "Not Somebody I Could Endorse, Ever"

user-pic

I can't wait to introduce her to Washington.

Well, mcCorpse, your buddy Washington would turn over in his grave to see the Dame you brung to the campaign!

The lie about Raines probably wasn't very smart, because the controversy over that competes with the attack on the Johnson association, which would have been a cleaner attack. Haven't been watching the MSM much, though, to see how they're covering it.

Yes. They got greedy. (And here I thought McCain was going to end greed, like, forever.) If they had just stuck with Johnson, the story would be "Obama Ties to Former Fannie Mae CEO". Instead, they had to try to get Raines, too, so the story becomes, "McCain Distorts Obama Ties to Former Fannie Mae CEO". This pushes the "McCain = Liar" meme and does little to damage Obama.

Chump move. +1 Obama

What's stupider, the race or the electorate? I'm positive the rest of the world just scratches their heads wondering how the U.S. became the most powerful country in the world.

not only should the WaPo issue a disclaimer, they ought to tie it to the larger story of the McCain campaign's systematic repetition of lies. McCain is shitting on our politics, people. What is clear is that most of the MSM are coprophiliacs.

user-pic

Thank you, sjw, for introducing me to a new word.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=coprophiliac

-- ARG

you know, speaking of fannie and freddie, i've noticed ANOTHER something about mccain in his recent churn of tirades against anyone and everyone regarding the current economic situation.

it seems to me that today, mccain basically blamed the current situation on freddie and fannie -- it started with them, he claimed this morning (he's wrong, but whatever, i'll grant the argument for a moment). then he says that because of that, chris cox (or the head of the FEC, depending on which sentence of his speech you look at) should step down, because he betrayed the public trust.

that is to say, according to mccain, this is the fault of freddie and fannie, and the lack of regulatory oversight of those two entities. and punishment for that lack of oversight, according to mccain, must be visited upon the SEC.

that's a really nice story, except he forgot one thing: freddie and fannie are regulated in the first instance by OFHEO -- http://www.ofheo.gov/. OFHEO is charged with that duty, and that duty only: http://www.ofheo.gov/about.aspx?Nav=55

so why hasn't mccain mentioned OFHEO, either in his blame game, OR in his "alphabet soup" of regulatory agencies that are "to blame" for this mess?

could it be because he has no clue what OFHEO is?

Yep the Raines tie is not sticking in fact watchign MSNBC it is going the other way. Again tactical error by Mccain imho. Voters want solutions for the economy not constant attacks that are now far overshadowed by bailouts and the market in general. Mccain stood firm against bailouts early in the campaign what does he stand for now? Is it the populist BS he has been spinning, his real dereg it all self or aimless attacks that lose all potency when the hurricane winds of the economy blow them right off the map of low info voters. They want solutions and from Obama they are hearing from Mccain nothing, crickets that speech in Wisc today was full of platitudes and as usual zero substance. Where is the Beef Senator Mccain?

Did any of you catch the link to the NYT blog on the front page about all these bailouts costing us nearly $1 TRILLION?

$1 TRILLION!!! This is entirely unplanned, unbudgeted money. We are going to be feeling this for a long time. And the McCain campaign is harping on about raising taxes for the rich.

This is simply unbelievable. This is a fuck up of epic proportions. The Republicans should banned from government for the next 50 years for how bad they fucked things up.

"Two years ago, I called for reform of this corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." What is McCain referring to here? Fact check, anyone?

McCain is counting on the voters to *not give a shit* about facts. All he has to do is convince enough of them that he's mavericky enough to "change Washington/Wall St."

It might have worked if he'd stayed the old McCain and not chosen Palin.

Honestly, at this point his only pathetic hope is that Americans are too afraid of having an African-American POTUS.

user-pic

Agree with you in general, except that "the old McCain" disappeared lo-o-o-ong before he chose Palin as his VP.

He abandoned all of his pricipals years ago and started to do whatever it took to become the next Republican nominee.

Saturday Night Live did a cartoon (a TV Funhouse) of McCain endorsing Bush -- I think in 2000, after the nasty primary -- then going into his trailer and beating his head against a wall, or something like that. (Can't find it on YouTube.)

McCain showed us who he really is a long time ago.

-- ARG

This climate is a disaster for Mccain. It jettisoned Palin to gossip columns and occasional fluff pieces, forced his worst nightmare front and center (the economy),crushed any mo he had, put them firmly on D, brought back Gramm, highlighted his dereg past (and keating 5 is getting closer and closer to the surface methinks), trashed his silly attack ads, forced substance (still waiting) and took New Mexico and likely Colorado close to out of repub map.

Ohio is tightening, as is Florida, yes Minn and Wisc are also but I dont believe these states have fully refelected the current climate and when they do Mccain will be in further kimche.

Virginia is definitely in play despite CNU and IA's bizarre demographics in their polling. I would hazard a guess Missouri will tighten also and Indiana and NC if nothing more it forces Mccain to defend a once true red states and cost him resources.

Obama imho is doing exactly what he needs to: economy, economy and economy. He needs to stay there until Nov 4th. Even in the upcoming debate on foreign policy I have an inkling he will tie all the money spent in Iraq back to the economy and harp on it. The Iraqi budgets surplus alone could have bailed out AIG...

Lastly the biggest test is of course the MSM will it continue its focus on the economy and if so for how long. The longer it does the bigger the gap will grow in the polls and the countdown for the Wright fulisade from Mccain will grow it maybe after the latest botched effort all he has left. Then of course when he lays down that trump card out comes Keating five given the current climate I'd rather have angry rhetoric preacher than o yeh our opponent has been down this economic road before and here is what transpired...

Not only a lie, but a dog-whistle racist lie to boot.

You know, those black elites are always running the economy into the ground.

Actually, what is amazing to me here is that publications like the Post and WSJ are allowed to print and not retract falsehoods. What ever happened to FACT CHECKING?

McCain has now had ads with quotes from Fund and from the Post that claim to be TRUE, but in the end were NOT.

NO INTEGRITY left in the MSM whatsoever.

I say, float the WaPo retraction story and clarify the Rain's connection, but don't spend a lot of time on it. Stay on OFFENSE. While the focus is on the economy, stay on the economy.

This doesn't explain Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, the new SEC proposal....

Today is TALK LIKE A PIRATE DAY:
http://tinyurl.com/6rdogr

user-pic

Getting late in the day, but the true TLAP website is here:

http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html

There's always next year...

-- ARG

Obama was just on CNN and he was taking questions from the reporter pool and didn't seem to miss a beat. I wonder if McCain could take in depth questions from the reporter pool and show any real understanding. Imagine Palin facing those questions...

once again, obama proving that he is exponentially more fit for office than mccain. mccain, for the fifth time in five days, shot off his mouth in a reactionary and emotional manner regarding one of the biggest financial crises in history (if not the biggest). to quote a now-famous governor, "he didn't blink." he also didn't consider ... ONCE AGAIN.

obama, on the other hand, met with highly regarded economic minds, was briefed by the experts on the issues, and said that he's not going to offer any specific thoughts until he sees what is proposed by the treasury and/or the fed. which, of course, is the PRUDENT and WISE thing to do. as he said, the best thing to do now is to take a measured and thoughtful approach, see what the fed and treasury chairmen are proposing, and go from there.

contrast that with mccain and his sweeping, gaffe-filled, ill-considered set of specifics ... for the fifth time in 5 days, always self-contradictory, ever-changing, because he isn't, to quote himself, "considered the actual situation on the ground." the irony, given that last stump soundbite offered hundreds of times by mccain, is staggering.

edit: that last "isn't" should be a "hasn't."

user-pic

Dude (or Dudette).

Not trying to be petty, but please use the Shift key at the start of your sentences. (If you want people to actually read your posts, I mean.) That sea of lower case looks like crap. Really, it's rude not to do it.

Clearly you have the capacity to capitalize. Do it for reasons OTHER than emphasis, please.

Seriously. This is irritating.

Thanks for considering my point of view on this.

-- ARG

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address