McCain Ad Hits Obama By Suggesting His Leading Adviser Is (Black) Former Fannie Mae Head
The McCain campaign is up with a new ad that hits Obama on the economy, by attacking Obama for his associations with former Fannie Mae head Franklin Raines (who happens to be black):
The ad suggests that Raines is Obama's leading adviser. "Who advises him?" the narrator says. "The Post says it's Franklin Raines, for 'advice on mortgage and housing policy.'"
The actual quote from the Post, according to the McCain campaign's release, says merely that Raines has "taken calls from Barack Obama's presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters."
Jumping from there to suggesting that this guy is his leading economic adviser is a pretty audacious stretch, though it's child's play in comparison to the McCain campaign's other falsehoods.
Late Update: The Obama campaign has sent out this statement from Franklin Raines: "I am not an advisor to Barack Obama, nor have I provided his campaign with advice on housing or economic matters."
And here's another statement from the Obama camp:
"This is another flat-out lie from a dishonorable campaign that is increasingly incapable of telling the truth. Frank Raines has never advised Senator Obama about anything -- ever. And by the way, someone whose campaign manager and top advisor worked and lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shouldn't be throwing stones from his seven glass houses," said Obama-Biden campaign spokesman Bill Burton.
Late Late Update: Here's another point worth considering. The McCain campaign had their choice of two names from Fannie Mae to connect to Obama -- Jim Johnson, who is white, or Franklin Raines, who is black.
Johnson's connections to the Obama campaign are much, much more substantial, in that he helped to vet the VP contenders.
Instead, the McCain campaign chose Raines. And the image at the end of the ad, of the victimized taxpayer, is an elderly white woman.















Well, McCrazy's campaign has to get back to the meat'n'potatoes lying, if for no other reason than to stay on familiar rhetorical ground, but it's also a neat (and odious) way for them to finally begin introducing Race into the general election campaign's central nervous system.
September 18, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just watched McCain refer to Raines is a speech on the economy. Hasn't anyone told him yet that he's wrong? Or... is he simply carrying on the lie...?
Probably the latter of the two, no?
http://thepajamapundit.com/
September 19, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd just make a reponse ad, with a red rubber stamp on the same images- "LYING-Right across the screen"
September 18, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent idea! That's all he needs to say.
September 18, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was trying to research this, and couldn't find where this guy was on Obama's team of economic advisers.
Let me get this straight, Raines is NOT on Obama's board of economic advisers?
September 18, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, the fact that Raines is black is irrelevant.
The McCain campaign is attempting to tie Obama to Fannie Mae.
It has nothing to do with him being black. You seem to be emphasizing that in some nefarious way.
September 18, 2008 6:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that Raines' race has nothing to do with it.
September 18, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course it does. Reminds of the ad the Michigan Republicans are running tying Obama to Kwame Fitzpatrick. I'm betting they're hoping it will cause outrage too, another distraction. For the first time I'm disgusted, because this makes their strategy starkly obvious. They're pathetic.
September 18, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Raines' race is irrelevant, or should be.
But look at the add and see if you really think that McCain is not making it an issue. Look at the images in the ad:
Barack's black face
Barack's black face + Raines' black face
Raines' black face
Raines' black face
Building
Old white woman
Barack's black face
Do you really think the add would feature Raines' face so prominently if he looked like Phil Gramm?
McCain is attempting to use Raines' race to suggest a closer connection to Raines that there really is, plus generally remind voters of which candidate is the black one.
September 18, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, I just don't see the racism.
The pictures themselves aren't all that unflattering. You have a quizzical Obama, with the question of "who is advising him". It segues into a picture of a stern Raines with the bit on Fannie Mae, then transitions to a coyly smiling Raines when the narrator talks about him walking away with millions, then a smiling Obama.
Actually, the images aren't all that unflattering. Contrast that with the goofy, "I want to have sex with your children" Obama pic in the down right disgusting "Sex Ed" ad.
I simply don't see the argument that there's implicit racism.
Raines is a notorious figure, at least within DC circles, due to his rise and fall at Fannie Mae. Since Fannie Mae symbolizes the latest financial meltdown, McCain is trying to tie Obama to it. Sort of like making the discredited Raines Obama's Phil Gramm.
September 18, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is because you have decided, divorced from any objective consideration, what this must be.
September 18, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's right, one must begin all analysis from the premise that if you aren't voting for TheMessiah it can only be because you are an ignorant racist redneck...I mean Jesus was a community organizer for Christ's sake (no pun intended)...what's wrong with you?
September 19, 2008 8:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are you contrasting Obama's expression in this ad with the photo in the sex ed spot?
September 19, 2008 2:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
What an absolute bum.
September 18, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain has gone from talking about make-up last week to making it up this week.
September 18, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should use Phil Graham in negative ads:
He called us a "nation of whiners" and American's economic view is really a "mental recession". He wrote McCain's economic policy and was going to be his economic advisor if he won the White House.
And more important he wrote the anti-regulation legislation that got us in the problem in the first place.
Easy ad for Obama to run.
September 18, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gramm- not Graham. I knew what you meant-just a clarification...:)
September 18, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
People don't know who that guy is so I don't know how effective this ad is.
September 18, 2008 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. And his name hasn't been associated with any of the current issues surrounding Fannie and Freddie. Not like Phil "Nation of Whiners" Gramm.
September 18, 2008 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. This is pretty weak. McCain needs to talk about what he would do. Telling people Obama knows someone people have never heard of doesn't mean much.
Pufferfish
September 18, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain is talking about what he would do ... talk.
September 18, 2008 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I for one don't think ads can decide this election however effective it sounds and plays. The fact remains that both camps are exaggerating their claims in order to get their points across and take a hit on the other side. MSM has also helped educate people on how both sides are sort of lying a little in their ads to make the point.
This election will be decided on the most pressing issue for the people now which is Economy and we all know which candidate is better off on that issue.
September 18, 2008 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
But ads like these can certainly prejudice people. It can make a 'tolerant' person maybe second guess their support. The racial undertone is unmistakable.
September 18, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
This ad is less about this "advisor" and more about putting two black guys together to scare all the white people! The visuals say it all. 'See, what Obama will do if he gets in the white house?' 'He'll fill it with black people! Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc. etc.' That's what you're really getting at, right McCan't?
September 18, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bingo!
It doesn't matter what the ad says verbally, it is the visual imagery that matters:
"you're hurting and this black and the other black guy are at fault and if you elect the black guy you're going to get more of the same AND HE'S GONNA RAISE YOUR TAXES and LET AL QUEDA KILL YOU while he calls the precious Alaskan beauty queen a PIG! This is an affront to white people everywhere by this UPPITY BLACK MAN and all his BLACK FRIENDS! Did I mention I'm a helpless, computer-illiterate, cancer-surviving, no-kitchen-table-or-chair-having-for-five-and-half-long-years, POW? Did I tell you that? He's BLACK and I"M NOT! I'm John McCain and I approved this message."
September 18, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
And if Palin makes it to the VP residence, it'll be a 4 year high school reunion.
September 18, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
and the sad thing is that I know someone who literally fears that. But we can't cater to the fears of few... though obviously that is all mcShame has got left. Pitiful!
September 18, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
From Ben Smith's shop.
September 18, 2008 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice!
September 18, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah - they've really zinging back.
September 18, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
From Ben Smith's shop.
September 18, 2008 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain will never be honest, its not in his nature to tell the truth.
September 18, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
My first thought was race, but it was a factor, then again we're talking about the republicans.
P.S. Franklin Raines does not advise Obama, but Phil Grahm advises McCain.
September 18, 2008 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
a political discourse of lies: welcome to John McCain's vision of a fascist America
September 18, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain lies in all his ads so this isn't something new.
September 18, 2008 7:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well d'uh - They're both black, so of course they work together. Every single black person in American knows every single other black person in America. And they are all responsible for the behavior of each and every one of them. They're interchangeable!
[rolls eyes]
everybody knows that!
September 18, 2008 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Knowing Republicans of course they did this ad for racial overtones. They could have used anybody else that supposedly adviced Obama but they used this African-American guy in their ad.
As an African-American I can see this ad as a kind of Willie Horton ad in which they put Obama with another black guy who supposedly was "crooked" which connotates the racial stereotypes of blacks and then at the end of the ad they put a face of a white woman who is in the age in which Obama has the most trouble with: women over the age of 65.
The BEST thing that Obama could do is just ignore this ad but put up the ad of Phil Gramm.
September 18, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know, I think using it to say "There goes John McCain, lying again" is pretty good. Obama turns a weak attack on him into a very strong attack on McCain's credibility.
September 18, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad Burton slammed him quick on that. Seven glass houses is niiiice!
September 18, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
No reason to point out race here.
September 18, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
My darling Jonze - you never think there's any reason to point out anything controversial -
So you are giving an expected response. ;)
September 18, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just think making race an issue hurts the Obama campaign and wouldn't cry "race card" unless it is blatant as hell.
September 18, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course it'd be foolish for Obama's campaign to point out race. I think, however, that we're not going to scare any low-information voters by analyzing the obvious use of race in the ad.
If asked about it, I wonder if Obama could get away with something like "It's obvious what this ad is about, and it's sadly typical of the McCain campaign. We don't feel the need to comment further." Then when reporter asks if they're referring to race, Obama's like, not at all, it's just McCain being a lying POS again.
September 18, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree we might as well talk about it now that Josh has pointed it out ad all, but Jonze is kind of right in that if bloggers and commenters say this week that McCain made a "white hands" ad, next week, McCain's handlers will be screaming that Obama personally played the race card on poor innocent John (because its always all about race with those people, inn't it?).
Cripes how many times have you heard hard-corce supporters of a prominent primary foe (who we now all adore) insist that Obama himself personally called her prominent husband, or the candidate herself, racist when, in fact, he did no such thing based upon the assumption that he used his super mind powers to control the blogs. Hell, its even money that this comment alone will be enough to reignite that seemingly endless "you touched your nose!" argument.
September 18, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Except that I didn't realize the purpose of these threads was solely to advise the campaign or work for it, if you see what I mean.
It's also about talking about this shit -
September 18, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
First of all, 2 black men (the bad guys) share the screen, then we see a sad older white woman who represents the victim. The objective here is obvious and won't be lost on the McCain base of voters they're pandering to who won't vote for Obama because he's black. This is yet another low for the McCain but no longer unexpected. He's using the Jackson Pollack school of campaigning (though I intend no insult to Jackson Pollack). Just throw everything at the canvas. Or maybe it's some Rovian notion of the "chaos" theory...But people should be outraged at this garbage from McCain campaign. It's racism, again. I hope someone in the MSM brings it up.
September 18, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
And it isn't that McCain is going to lose any of the black vote from this ad since he has virtually none to begin with.
September 18, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
FROM POLITICO:
Raines said in the statement through the campaign, "I am not an advisor to Barack Obama, nor have I provided his campaign with advice on housing or economic matters."
Obama spokesman Bill Burton added an attack:
"This is another flat-out lie from a dishonorable campaign that is increasingly incapable of telling the truth. Frank Raines has never advised Senator Obama about anything -- ever. And by the way, someone whose campaign manager and top advisor worked and lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shouldn't be throwing stones from his seven glass houses."
September 18, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
And he might have added: Someone whose running mate never ever heard of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac shouldn't be throwing stones -
September 18, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cool it! She's confident and ready, can see Russia from her house, and won't blink! Show some deference!
September 18, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will John McCain ever run out of lies?
We have 47 days left to find out...
September 18, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
A liar NEVER runs out of lies. Keep this in mind. A truth-teller has only one story. A liar has millions of lies.
September 18, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given that, someone should start the McCainLieCounter.
September 18, 2008 9:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Typical Atwater/Rove style political. No doubt, this is designed to smear Obama's Friday when Obama will be meeting with his economic advisers. The is an attempt to derail the POWERFUL positive message that this meeting will send to voters in tomorrow's and the weekend news cycles. If McCain keeps this up he will give me everything I need to rewrite the republican playbook.
Here is a list of his top advisers.
September 18, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
BO has regained his EV lead on 538. Now i can exhale.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/
September 18, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
To me it makes no sense that EVs can change back and forth that radically.
Which just adds to my total distrust of numbers.
September 18, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
The reason is state polls are not done on a daily basis. As a result, there is a lag time between the dailies and states polls.
September 18, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
It just shows how close swing states are. Team Obama believes their GOTV registration is the difference and that it is not properly represented in polls that use the 2004 "voter census" numbers
September 18, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The national polls can move on a daily basis and are likely to be gauging the fickle nature of many swing voters. The states change also but are not reflected as quickly as the dailies because those polls occur less frequently, although the pace has picked up since the conventions.
September 18, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena,
It is not the numbers which are untrustworthy. Rather, it is how people use them. One rule of thumb is that if the numbers are in their favor they state them. When numbers are not in their favor generally folks use percent. Which simply means you have to know percent of what.
Take for instance the teenage pregnancy rate. The percentages are damning for black teens at ~70% VS. 25% for white teens. Now, why is that 70% always banded about? Because if they used raw numbers people would easily see that their are 5X as many white teens giving birth out of wedlock as black teens.
For the EV numbers, it is all about which states are considered leaning or in the bag for either candidate. If either of those variables are switched the EV numbers can do a major swing. After all, Fl has what 27 EV, when that state is flipped from one side to the other you can get a major swing regardless of what CO, NM, OH (20) PA (21) does. OH/PA are major swing states in EV...so if Obama is considered not likely to win either of those you have a big swing.
Similar to what folks have told us about the polls that major registered vs. likely voters. You can get some pretty big swings depending on how those 2 populations are sampled.
Same goes in this case for how states are handled for the EV.
September 19, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wes Colley's page has Obama leading McSame 273 EV to 265. Compared to 2004, Obama flips CO, IA, and NM.
September 18, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
IA and NM look pretty good now, Colorado is still a dead heat.
It's still going to come down to the Presidential debates - let's hope Obama mock debates nightly. He needs to work on his umms and ahhs and pauses, because McCain is going to speak in campaign bullet points.
September 18, 2008 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
even if mcShame's bullet points have nothing to do with the question! Pre-emptive answers!
September 18, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think McCain will stumble over his tongue again and again. If Mr.Grumpy doesn't take a nap before the big night, it's going to get mighty ugly. Obama will be just like the champ Mohammad Ali...he'll float like a butterfly and sting like a bee. (gosh that's corny, sorry)
September 18, 2008 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope we don't get into a situation where he gets a sympathy vote, or is marked on a curve cause he's so confused and all.
September 18, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, and I can add this: In Bush's debates, he got credit from his stupid and obnoxious base and from a lot of other dullards, misanthropes, and curmudgeons basically for showing up and snearing.
I don't want to be cocky, but I suspect the dynamic might be different here. Obama's more likeable than Gore and will hopefully be quick on his feet. He does need to keep those "uh's" at bay. McCain can try to delver straight, canned answers, but unlike self-worshipping Bush, can probably be rattled by the unpredictable.
September 18, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I cannot believe how not outraged everyone seems to be. Not only is it nothing but mendacity. You could say that about every ad of his. This is a pure plea to white people over 50 who are grasping at anything they can as an excuse for supporting McCain. This is a generation of people who came of age in the 1950s, a generation caught at a hinge of history between blatant outright straight up racism and the civil rights revolution. You can spot them because they always say, "I just don't trust him. And that's not because he's black. He just seems weaselly", which is not only what that Rothchild woman said, but what my own parents say to themselves and to anyone who asks their opinions. This is racism at its nastiest. I wonder how long McCain can keep this boat afloat?
September 18, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, no one can remain at white hot rage all the time. Besides, it's not good for one's blood pressure.
September 18, 2008 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone seen the anti-Obama Vets for Freedom ad about the surge?
September 18, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just saw it. The 527's are here.
September 18, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, of all the people that Obama knows through his dealings on committees in the Senate and in his political life WHO were also involved in some way with Fannie, Freddie or AIG, I find it too coincidental that McCain's spinmeisters chose this man. He happens to be Black. Hmmm...me thinks I smell subliminal racism. Didn't he spend the last 3 weeks talking about conceived sexism about Palin because of ASSOCIATIONS made by Obama's camp? It strikes me as he should be the last one connecting dots between a candidate and his "associates". Before this ad I wasn't in favor of Obama bringing up the Keating Five issue but I think it's time.
September 18, 2008 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keating isn't a big attack point since McCain was A]Cleared by the Ethics Committee and B]It was basically the launch of his Maverick brand.
According to Wiki he was included only because the group wanted a Republican in the snare, and the GOP countered with including John Glenn due to McCain's inclusion.
Obama and Biden both waxed poetic about John Glenn when they had a rally in Ohio, so I might presume that they might not attack with the Keating Five on the grounds it would have certain Glenn/Ohio blowback.
September 18, 2008 8:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Johnson also publicly left the Obama campaign months ago. Now Raines seems like he was never apart of it - so it could be interesting if Obama wanted to challenge them on it, but it's a loser issue for him.
I mean Obama and his "Old Boys Network" comment could be framed as a dog whistle of sorts as well - I mean how many picture non-white folks in a "Ol' Boys Network"?
You can't call "Race Card" unless it is blatant, and the McCain Camp is too smart to make it blatant.
September 18, 2008 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Scary, scary black men!
This is another dishonorable ad brought to us by the McCain campaign.
September 18, 2008 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Video of Scary Palin, today, calling it the "Palin and McCain administration".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZKQDyL5gzc&eurl=http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/a-what-administ.html
Looks like the power trip has really gone to Sarah Mooselini's head, and she has pulled a palace coup, before she even had one vote cast for her.
Old Johnny better watch out. Scary Mooselini is likely to shoot him from the air, and then land and field dress him. YUP! YUP!
And as always; Scary Palin wants all of you teenagers to follow her family's example, and always Keep Your Johnson In Your Levis. YUP! YUP!
September 18, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
September 18, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shit, why doesn't the McCain campaign just come out with a "Scary Blacky Black-Black wants to be your president, bringing to the White House a ghetto culture of bling and rap in an administration that's dark from top to bottom. OOGA BOOGA!!! SCCAAAARRRYYY!!! Did we mention he's BLACK?!?!" and just get it over with? I mean, for chrissakes.
September 18, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw the surge ad but people do not give a flying f*ck about the surge.
It's the economy, stupid!!!
September 18, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
That does have to be correct. Surge, smurge.
September 19, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign will NEVER mention this ad is racist which it is. I don't care what anybody says.
What they will do is just do another great attack ad themselves.
Bring on the Phil Gramm ad!!!
September 18, 2008 9:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
1st mccain camp got no other option but 2 use barack race as an answer,but they don't know how so whut they do instead they talk about britney spears and paris hilton eg(rep.harold ford-TENN)lipstick on a pig and blackberry phones instead of real issues,also the GOP's own the media,and whut the media do,they go and interview white racist uneducated rural people in W.VA,pennsylvania,ohio and kentucky,Barack is a muslim,how tha fuck is he a muslim when I seen this man ate scrambled eggs and cheese wit pork bacon and pancakes,also to all the smart bloogers on TPM do not respond back to anything that DEMBILL C say,if u respond back to him he actually wins the battle so whut u do is kill him in the nice nasty and tell him to have a nice day or just ignore him.
September 18, 2008 9:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
As McInsane is trying to paint 'black and scary' on Obama . . .
Obama should paint 'old and scarier' by pointing out Bush and McCain both argued for shoving 25% of our and our grandparent's Social Security into the now falling stock market.
That's the ad that NEEDs to be running in Ohio, Florida and Arizona.
September 18, 2008 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thera P,,,,,,, true enough that a liar has a million lies, but the catch is that a liar has to have too good a memory. And McCain's memory is not so good.
September 18, 2008 9:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain't is a lying mfing c***sucker. I hope he shits his pants during the first debates.
September 18, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden went after the Republicans on the taxes-patriotism statement tonight. You gotta love that guy. No backing down at all. Give them hell, Joe.
Pufferfish
September 18, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain Camp is desperately hoping somebody jumps up and calls "racist" because they are getting slaughtered with the focus on the economy.
As it is, the National Security/Foreign Policy debate next week is a life preserver for McCain even if it is a week from tomorrow. Obama needs to keep pressing on the Economy.
What Obama absolutely should do is tie Foreign Policy to the Economy during the debate.
September 18, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think, right before the debates start, Obama should make a joke and suggest McCain swear on the bible to tell the truth during the debates. It would be fun to watch McCain turn from ghost white to red, then purple then maroon or something.
September 18, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
greg,
Interesting point about Johnson and raines. It appears the McCain ad is injecting subtle signs of race. I am not surprised at all.
September 18, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Subtle?? You're kidding, right?
September 19, 2008 8:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
This whole campaign is just making me sad. Just call me stupid, but I had no idea how racist this country is. In an odd way, White Supremists don't even bother me. It is all the "nice" white folks in their nice middle America towns.
Excuse me while I go puke.
September 18, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hope that made you feel better, at least temporarily. This one is for racist retirees, and racists with old folks in their families.
September 19, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think they know no one will have unassisted reaction to Raines. (Ignoring for the moment the race aspect.) That's why they have to try to push the viewer with "Shocking!" in the middle of the ad. If you have to come out and explicitly tell the viewer how to feel like that, you're probably insecure about the impact of the allegation itself.
September 18, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is definitely an attempt to foster the "he'll give black radicals jobs!" fears. They want people to think that back at Chicago HQ, the Obama campaign is staffed with a bunch of Black Panthers, Nation of Islam members, Bloods, Crips, and Jew-Haters. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth. If you look at Obama's team, you know that it's mostly a bunch of white men and women, a good number of whom are Jewish. If you read Ryan Lizza's piece on Obama's rise in The New Yorker - hardly a flattering piece on Obama - you'll realize that Obama didn't rise through the ranks of the black radical movement nor was he mentored by a bunch of old, black, machine politicians. In fact, the opposite was true - it was those people he had to defeat and/or win over during his climb up the ladder in Chicago/Illinois politics.
They want people to think that Obama is just a more refined version of Al Sharpton. That's the intent here. And as I've noted earlier, there are plenty of people who a) are not really racist, b) kind of like Obama, but c) hold on to an irrational concern that if elected, Obama might fill his cabinet with radicals and give a bunch of handouts to minorities.
Now, Franklin Raines is hardly a black radical. But as noted above, nobody knows who the guy is anyway. He's just another shady, black politician. They used him because a) he does have some connection to recent events and b) he's not Jeremiah Wright. (need to save that one up for the last week of October)
September 19, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
my tpm members, i urge all of you to ignore the obvious racial undertone of this ad....i have been a proud and very vocal opponent of the racial innuendos and we all have learned first hand how a comment made by an insignifant commenter such as myself will be used to smear obama....look no further than intelligent people such as desi and djamo among others who charge obama with the race card when in fact there is no documented instances where he or his team accused the clintons of this....we have said it here, some AA's, including some prominent ones called it, but Obama and his team have always ignored or discouraged that label..if smart individuals on this board carelessly use that lie to score points against obama, imagine what will happen when those who are already racially motivated will think! this will be one more excuse to saddle obama with something he strongly downplays even though we all know it has been going on forever and will continue beyond this election!!!
obama please come back hard with a fact-biting ad.....i am steering clear of the racist charge for fear of unfair backlash towards the O team..they are on fire and i want them to keep the fire burning!!!
September 19, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow.
Mustachioed corrupt black villain preys on fragile elderly white women for their life savings.
That is the core message of this ad.
Nothing else.
September 19, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
The trick is in the way they introduce Raines - his face comes up with the phrase "Shocking" as if to say "surprised Obama picked a black guy?"
The subtext of the ad is the old affirmative-action ploy, by suggesting that Obama picked an unqualified black man over a more qualified white.
September 19, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cher,
I understand your concerns but please repeat after me: "African-American", not "AA". It's OK to say "black". Contrary to some of the color-blindness proponents on this site, it's not a taboo term.
Jonze,
The only way to fight racism is to confront it. Ignoring race and racism in any context isn't an option for some of us. After this presidential election is over, I'll still be black. What will you be?
September 21, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink