McCain Campaign Sheds Crocodile Tears About Media To Build Up Palin's Speech Tonight
The Repubs really do need to get their message straight about the allegedly vicious and destructive media assault -- otherwise known as "journalism" -- on Sarah Palin.
As you've heard already, McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt wailed and beat his breast about the coverage of Palin in an interview in this morning's Washington Post.
Schmidt, one of the most hard-boiled operatives out there, a man who lived through the Clinton impeachment circus, a fellow who worked for Bush in 2004 and encouraged the media's savaging of John Kerry, actually accused the press of being "on a mission to destroy" Palin, adding that his campaign feels "under siege."
But now former GOP House Majority Leader Tom DeLay is sounding a decidedly different message: The coverage is actually good for Palin!
"The media has done more for John McCain in the last two days than he's done for himself in the last year and a half," DeLay said."Trashing her is waking up the sleeping giant, and the sleeping giant is Republican women," he claimed.
DeLay, of course, hints here at the cynicism at the core of Schmidt's crocodile tears about the media and about the alleged sexism GOPers have been claiming is behind coverage of Palin. Beyond being an obvious bid to stir up the base, it's an effort to corral female support by building up the emotional payoff of tonight's speech and spinning it into a narrative of trial-by-sexism followed by triumph.















folks, can you let me know what your commenting experiences have been? we're having severe tech troubles again. apologies
September 3, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really bad last night. Smooth this morning.
September 3, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I stayed away for months, Greg, assuming that all would be fixed and the old blogs back. Only to find all is the same (maybe worse!) than before.
Everything loading like molasses. If it loads. Comments getting error messages. Or not loading. Or maybe actually posting an hour later - after you've given up all hope and gone away!
My take only: I think tpm's great success taking on the Dept of Justice led to sabotage of your site - in the guise of helping you. And if so, then every time the "other side" sees the traffic here go up and the posts driving the news cycles, then boom... they put the screws to the site!
Maybe I'm wrong. But this is unlike any other site I've ever posted on! Ever!!!!
Sympathies all around. Maybe this will post now.
September 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, now I'll tell you more. What happens for me is the system on the front page recognizes me. But when I try to post, a box asking for password opens up. Even if I enter the password, the box keeps coming up. But if I ignore the box and push send again, sometimes it works anyway! This problem used to happen after the changeover. Then it went away. Now it's back.
September 3, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've had similar problems from the very first conversion. I never did get my old account name back. That's just a lost cause. As for posting. I often find that even though I'm logged in and greeted at the top of the page with my name, I have to log in a couple of more times before I can post. Inviting, huh? Anyhow, when the log in box pops up at a post attempt, I fill it in and hit {enter}. Inevitibly, the system quickly returns that the Account & Password are incorrect. I resubmit, hitting {Enter} only once, and after a seemingly interminable wait, feedback that I'm accessing something like Talkingpointsmemo.comments.... appears in the info box at the bottom of my browser (FireFox 3.0. If I see that, I know I'm getting in and just have to wait. I hope this helps. It's kludgy, at best.
September 3, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this a Movable Type system? Can you "Just" go borrow what they use at Slashdot, Huffington Post or Kos?
Or is that all proprietary and expensive?
This blog has some of the best content but absolutely the worst user experience of any I know.
If it wasn't for the content I would give up in frustration.
September 3, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The organization of the pages sucks as well, and that is an entirely different issue from the tech snafus.
We have no clue when we click on something that it may be from March or even earlier. And there are no headings indicating what sort of content you are looking at on the front page(s).
But yes, content is king.
September 3, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
erratic. lots of error messages the other night, frequently slow, okay now. I haven't been using an avatar lately, but I miss everyone else's!
Good luck. If you live blog Princess Sarah's speech tonight, it's going to be crazy here.
September 3, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok so far today, but the avatars are missing!! Where's my Punchy, dammmit!
September 3, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very bad Greg.
The site freezes up when I send a comment and showed an error message, then I resend it, and later the post shows up twice. this happened several times.
Also, the avatars are missing.
September 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Greg,
Posts are still slow going, but no errors as yet.
September 3, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Constant 500 Server Errors. Delays of minutes after hitting Send. Constantly having to log in again. The best part is WordPress works great (far better than the software you guys have been struggling with) and it's free for the download.
September 3, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg: On Monday and Tuesday, after submitting a post, I was directed to an "Internet Server Error" page that made it look like my post had not gone through. This is no doubt the reason for all the mulitple posts (including my own). Today that problem seems to have been solved. I must say I do miss our ID photos, but I suppose it's a small price to pay for smooth communication.
IMHO, the fact that your server was overloaded on Monday and Tuesday is a testament to what a great job you're all doing. TPM is the place I've kept coming back to over the last 5 days, as your up-to-the-minute coverage of the current whirlwind of breaking news is the best I've seen on the web. Keep up the good work!
Also, the reader comments on this site are, in general, more intelligent than most -- and many of them are downright hilarious. Not to get all mushy year, but (snifffle...)I love you guys, man!
September 3, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
better without the avatars
September 3, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, has this image made it to TPM?
My guess is a substantial portion of America will find this pretty hot!
http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/6858/palinsn5.jpg
September 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or, um, classless.
September 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Go away troll. That is photoshop, so don't try and plant your Trojan Horses here.
September 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Naw, I don't think it's photoshop. It it were, they'd have gotten rid of the fat thighs and the muffin-top bulge.
September 3, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
If that isn't a real photo, it should be.
September 3, 2008 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that her high-school drop-out future son-in-law behind her?
September 3, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's Photoshopped. HuffPo has the story
September 3, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Go to be with a crocodile! Wake up with a crocodile!
Amazing how these "masters of smear" can't take the heat when they themselves have created the very situation they're decrying!
Truly... this is getting weirder by the day!
September 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain clearly never vetted Schmidt, that's for damn sure.
September 3, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It figures WaPo is the media outlet getting Schmidt interviews.
Pathetic excuse for journalism.
September 3, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, of course Delay thinks that - he thinks people can actually look at his mug shot and see Jesus. He said so.
I can't believe he's not in jail - nevermind their letting him talk in public.
Wow.
September 3, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I watch the cable news coverage today, I'd hardly call the build-up to Palin's speech "trashing her". Everyone that I've been watching has been saying that more people are excited about her speech than were excited about Obama's.
But, it would be deviating from the GOP talking points to speak about the media in any way other than negative.
http://thepajamapundit.com/
September 3, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
If by "trashing" Schmidt means doing the vetting that he and McCain should have done, then yeah.
September 3, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I am wondering is how long the Republicans are going to be holding Gov. Palin under "house arrest". This feels very "Stepford" to me. Will she EVER be allowed to field actual questions? How can they believe that anyone will actually vote for a ticket where the VP nominee/candidate is LITERALLY being controlled by Schmidt, Black, Rove, Wallace et al. This is really really crazy!
September 3, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg - yeah, commenting has slowed way back down - for me it hangs for quite awhile, but it does still post - so far.
September 3, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
On posting: no avatars, but no doubles/errors (yet!).
September 3, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yawn! Republicans and there tactics don't even catch my interest anymore. Am I supposed to be outraged? Sympathetic? What? Poor, poor Republicans reaping what they sow.
Wow, attacking the liberal media.... that's a new one. What's next- read my lips, no new taxes?
How about doing something for the middle class instead? Oh, wait that's Obama and the Democrats.
I'll take actually trying to do something about and talking to my concerns as a voter over acting like a baby any day.
September 3, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was surprised that GHWB didn't pull the obvious end-run on this "commitment" many years ago: "Well, we promised to not introduce any new taxes, so we just had to raise the rates on the old ones."
September 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
hHs Tom DeLay ever actually paid genuine attention to a republican woman?
Because if he had, he would know that they fall into two groups:
1) Throwback '50s wives, who will NEVER vote for a woman who looks like the kind of office Barbie they're afraid will steal their husbands.
2) Secret feminists who are insulted by the elevation of a beauty contest runner-up who's barely qualified to be PTA president.
Either way, McCain couldn't have found a more effective anchor to sink him with republican women.
September 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good analysis.
I heard some radio interviews with female voters in New Hampshire this a.m., some of whom had voted for Hillary and had considered voting for McCain, and they were all offended that Palin got chosen just because she's a woman even though she's clearly not qualified.
September 3, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
You got it - thank you for getting it.
I have said from the moment I first saw her and read about her that she is exactly the kind of woman women as a rule Do Not Like.
She's a phony - women can spot a phony woman from 10 miles off.
September 3, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you're right.
September 3, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
This tactic has worked reliably for the GOP for a long time. The MSM are complicit owing to their corporate ownership, the buddy system with their sources, their pack mentality (echo chamber), and laziness on the part of individual reporters and editors.
It looks like it's starting to crumble just a little bit, driven by forces well beyond their control. Dunno how fast it will happen or how it will all play out, but it's interesting to watch.
September 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I said it the other day and I'll say it again: she is Princess Di.They're all swooning over her, and it's now about her, not boring old McCain.
Remember how Princess Di was going to revitalize the monarchy, make them fresh, modern, relevant?
September 3, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, the narrative from the GOP tonight will not be about the content of her speech; but how strong of a person she is for overcoming the adversity of the past few days to deliver her speech.
Talk about setting the bar low in terms of expectations!
September 3, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
They have little other option. When things get this bad the only thing you can do is attack back, indiscriminately, and just hope it sticks with the public. Oh, and they lost US Weekly. That has to be a first.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
September 3, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg: If you're going to put any effort/money/time at all into fixing/improving comments, may I cast a vote for a preview function? Please!
September 3, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
Don't worry about an edit function. A preview function will serve just fine. Preview is pretty easy to do, but edit is hard. I'd advise to not get overly ambitious with edit, lest it delay implementation of preview.
September 3, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the media were doing it's job it would point out that Palin was mayor of Wasilla which is world famous - for weed.
Yep, Matanuska Valley is indeed home of the world famous Matanuska Thunderfuck, some of the best ganj around. And Wasilla is smack in the middle of Matanuska Valley.
September 3, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
For real? Brings in lots of cash people spend on stuff. Maybe that's why Madame Mayor instituted the sales tax, gotta get a piece of that and build the hockey mom a hockey rink!
September 3, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Google "Matanuska Thunderfuck"
I was totally spoiled growing up in Alaska, even Humbolt County Gold doesn't come close to the Thunderfuck.
I went to College in Oregon and when people found out I was from AK they often wanted to know if I had a hookup who could ship it down. And Oregon is known for having the good stuff.
I don't know if it is the main cash crop for Wasilla, but I would be surprised if it wasn't.
September 3, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm...I heard that she said she smoked marijuana when it was legal in Alaska -- but didn't like it.
Was there some period when it was legal in Alaska and there was no federal law against it? That seems highly unlikely to me.
September 3, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, until 1991 it was legal to hav up to 4 oz for personal use. When I was a kid I used to have a paper route and people would have weed plants growing in thier windows.
All kids growing up in Alaska, at least almost all, smoked weed. It was easier to get than alcohol.
September 3, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I just heard the sound of James Dobson's head exploding.
September 3, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
IT's also better for you than booze.
it's not toxic.
September 3, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't worry about rallying McCain's dogs. What GOP foot soldiers hate is campaigning, and they were going to rally no matter what this go round because Democrats are no longer abstaining from the practice to lure them away.
The fact that we no longer act as though office is a birthrite of Republicans, and something they have to work for like everyone else, was never going to go over well with the folks who find democracy a bureaocratic formality, but it was never really our job to win them over with our willingness to mind our place.
By choosing Palin, McCain got his "base" excited, but he is alienating anyone capable of choosing to vote for a non-Republican.
Face it - if you're voting Republican this year, you're not an undecided or independent. You're a partisan Republican who is incapable of voting for anyone without an R by their name. Republicans can't screw up any worse. This is as bad as it gets, and if they're undecided, it simply means they aren't quite as enthusiastic as before.
He can have his base. We'll take everyone else.
September 3, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cry me a river, Steve Schmidt. What a trainwreck. Delay may be right. The coverage is stirring up the repug base. That's good for the bottom of the slate, as they're going to need turnout. Palin becomes a martyr, which is probably a good career move. She can get a radio show like Ollie North.
September 3, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why wouldn't she go back to governing "the biggest state in the Union" (which has a population that exceeds only Vermont and Wyoming)?
September 3, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. That base that represents the 29 percenters.
September 3, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do republican women even have the right to vote? I thought they were supposed to be barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen...
September 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The same media fixated on the pregnancy of the daughter of a VP candidate previously covered up the mistress/love child scandal of John Edwards who was running for President. Why? Because Edwards the pathological liar is a Democrat and is a man.
September 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is John Edwards still running?
September 3, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can see the DIFFERENCE between the way that Obama handled both his Reverend Wright crisis and the way that the McCain camp is handling Palin's roll-out to the media.
Obama took it like a man and went on interviews and even did a major speech on race that millions of people watched on TV and on youtube. When Wright went on the warpath again Obama again took the mature route and gave a news conference and answered ALL QUESTIONS.
The media respects Obama for that.
Now the McCain camp is whining about how the media is mistreating Palin, etc. Instead they should make sure that she gives a fabulous speech tonight (which I am sure she will), and then have her go on charm offensive with the media.
Palin does have charm and charisma and I am sure she can use this with the media. However, by hiding her in a "hole" for days is actually INCREASING the media frenzy.
September 3, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chuck Todd was just saying that after the convention Palin is heading back to Alaska for "awhile" - I guess to actually do some "guverning" and to prepare for her son's shipping out to Iraq - and that it might be awhile before she's out on the campaign trail. I don't know if it's true, but it sounds like maybe the crash course lessons aren't going so well?
September 3, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks to me like they'll do anything to keep Sarah Palin away from any microphone that doesn't have a teleprompter in front of it. They wouldn't even let her talk off-the-cuff to Phyllis Schaffly yesterday.
September 3, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
No matter what happens someone needs to get ahold of CNN and tell them to put a sock in it. Brown the night before was stupid. Laughing with a surprised look that says "your an idiot" doesn't do the Dem side any favor. Then Roland Martin gets on last night and pontificates....Who do they think watches this stuff? This is starting to look amazingly like Kerry for President Round Duex. Where is Hillary when you need her?
September 3, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
You would just love the media to stop hammering her and turning old Grampy's campaign into a trainwreck, wouldn't you?
September 3, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
YOu got that just right.
No, this thing is a thing of beauty. This is what we've waited for - she's a walking compendium of everything that is wrong with today's Repug Party - she's a pinata, for heaven's sake!
September 3, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tina!
That was an inspiration! Maybe some enterprising Democrat will start making them. I'll sure buy a couple!
September 3, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about making Palin available for a press conference?
Barack Obama has dealt with tremendous scrutiny since Iowa, much of it negative, but said the attention was legit since he was relatively unknown.
Now Palin comes along and, no soon than she's introduced, the McCain brains trust has her holed up in a secret bunker Dick Cheney style.
Whatever she does at this speech tonight won't mean much; it's only appearance reading off a teleprompter. No one even talks about Obama's transcendent speech in Denver anymore.
She'll ruin what was left of McCain's candidacy as their strategy now depends on reigniting the culture wars, not a good way to get middle class suburbanites to vote for you.
September 3, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
More evidence republicans are nothing but hypocrites (and the media let's them get away with it), here's Palin herself on Clinton's charges of sexism....
"She does herself a disservice to even mention it, really," Palin said. "When I hear a statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about that excess criticism, or maybe a sharper microscope put on her, I think, 'Man, that doesn't do us any good, women in politics, or women in general, trying to progress this country,'" Palin said. "I don't think it bodes well for her."
September 3, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is only one image and one phrase to describe the GOP at this moment:
Image:Bobby Knight hurling Chairs
Phrase: working the Refs
Then ponder this -
Will the MSM or as I'm sure it will be phrased tonight 'liberal media' aand New Kid on the Block - liberal blogs....
will they cower as certain refs do and pull punches/not make calls on 'fouls'
I think we all know what the MSM will do
September 3, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most will lay back, because they're cowards and very comfortable w/ the status quo. But, I think there are a few out there that sniff change in the winds and are willing to jump in and be on the front end of these currents. It's already started and I don't think that Schmidt or any of the rest of McCain's thugs can turn it around at this point. The Repubs are not ready to give up by a long shot, but I believe that they are at the beginning of a long, slow descent.
September 3, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's my question re Steve Schmidt: If it's OK for him to reference things that supposedly were said in "off-the-record" lunches, then isn't it OK for the writers who had those lunches say "that never came up in my lunch with them, but since we're no longer off the record, here's what was said:"?
September 3, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously, I said it on another thread, and I'll repeat it here: I think the problems with the website are directly related to all the statements coming out of the McCain camp. Most browsers can't display Whinese.
For those of you who haven't downloaded the Whinese character set, here's a transliteration of Steve Schmidt's statement: "Wooba-wooba sad-sad."
Those are actually the only two words in the Whinese language. In order to get the accent right you have make very, very sad face when you say them.
September 3, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain campaign has been awfully eager to play the victim card lately. They're the victim of bias in the press, of Obama's celebrity, of shocking (how DARE they?!?) allegations of cheating in the Saddleback forum, and now, of vicious liberal sexism.
The Saddleback flap is turning out to be pretty illuminating. The idea that McCain was in transit rather than in a soundproof room is perfectly understandable, easily explicable, and does not have to reflect poorly on anyone involved. Sample answer: "That's right, I wasn't backstage. I was on the freeway but didn't see a need to contradict Pastor Warren on stage, as I wasn't listening to the proceedings and didn't think it was all that important." That would have been the end of the story. Instead the campaign ratcheted up the indignation to absurd levels in order and turned it into a scandal that they could blame on Obama and the (boo! hiss!) liberal media.
That now seems to be McCain & co.'s standard response, and has been getting out of control regarding the Palin pick. With the exception of the abuse of power allegations, nothing that's come up would have been insurmountable if it all hadn't been sprung on the public at once and if the media and the voters had been given a little bit of time to acquaint themselves with Palin before McCain's announcement. But, instead of addressing minor rumors head on (Really, does anybody care about Trig's maternity? Why not just release a birth certificate and shut the gossipers up?), they seem to have hidden Palin away (in a soundproof room?) somewhere and responded to all questions as if they were malicious allegations, being as indignant as possible and exaggerating their importance.
If the past twenty years have taught us anything about the right wing, it's that there's absolutely nothing more in this world that they relish more than a bit of self-righteous indignation over their own victimhood. (Not to get off topic, but rich white Christian males in positions of power and influence have positioned themselves as victims of welfare, affirmative action, sexism, reverse-racism, religious persecution, media bias and, more generally speaking, the government - even when like-minded representatives are actually in control of the government.)
September 3, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, well, if they just dealt w/ it in a low-key, matter-of-fact manner and moved on, it would be no big deal. The fact that they blow it up w/faux outrage - never actually addressing the issues, mind you - suggests to me that there is probably truth in the issues that they are trying so clumsily to duck.
September 3, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
You know one reason why? Bloggers. Josh and Kos and Sully and the others made the situation hot enough that the McLame campaign was forced to reveal the pregnancy before they were ready to. That's a victory.
September 3, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
4 months and one day since Obama has had the poll of polls lead all to himself. Currently at 49%, the highest he's ever been versus McCain in that time.
I'm not SAYING,
I'm just saying...
September 3, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay first the masters of smear can't handle some actual journalism/vetting of their so-called qualified VP pick???
Then 'Tom De Lay'... well enough said... how did he get in here??? and he's just trying to get republican woman to be offended...
As a woman I will continue to make the point that Sarah Palin may have to face the leaders of North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Russia etc.? Do you really want to play 'victim' here??? Do you honestly think that helps your case in any way?!
Give me a break! If this woman and the republican party can't withstand media coverage... they certainly should not be in the white house.
September 3, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The repubs know they have to go into damage control mode as fast as possible. A congressman on CNN called James Carville a sexist 5 TIMES. He supported Hillary Clinton FULLY, and said NOTHING sexist about Campbell whatsoever. It was unbelievable the lengths these fools will go to.
September 3, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/unsurprised.html
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Unsurprised
"No Surprises From Palin, McCain Team Says"-Washington Post
Senior McCain officials described themselves as "unsurprised" today as huge storms of locusts flew from Wasilla, Alaska and descended upon McCain campaign headquarters. "Locusts were vetted. Locusts were vetted in the vet" said one campaign official, who spoke without attribution out of concern that he would be devoured by a verminous flying cloud. The campaign also said that they were nonplussed by reports that the rivers were running black with ashes, that family pets were begin to speak in human voices, declaiming "Release Sarah!", and that a huge spreading stain was beginning to blot out the Northern sun. "Vetted" said the campaign.
"There are exciting new studies that show that locusts can be used as a source of biodegradable fuel" said Newt Gingrich, as he hunkered down to avoid the black marble obelisks falling from the sky around him. "Palin, if she can be said to have played a role in bringing about these new biofuel resources, should be praised for her innovative role in the solution to our future energy demands".
"These events firmly demonstrate Palin's deep connection to traditional modes of traditional expression, in traditional forms, traditionally." said William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard. "Experience, in the face of these more traditional events, is overrated..." continued Kristol, before ending the interview to wrap himself head-to-toe in mosquito netting and swallowing a bitter tasting anti-malarial drug, the taste of which, as his lips contorted, he noted to be "surprisingly refreshing."
Palin's schedule in the upcoming days of the Republican National Convention has been cut short due to, as one McCain communications aide reported, a desire not to "let the magic out of the bottle too quickly." "Sarah is a precious resource, who each moment brings a new vitality and energy to every worker on the campaign" said the aide, while fighting to remove the nest of serpents which had suddenly materialized on the floor beneath him, and were now slowly ascending his legs. "Do these bite, or just slink?" asked the aide, who spoke on conditions of anonymity so as not to provoke or otherwise alienate the reptiles.
Meanwhile, as the heavens darkened, the seas began to boil, and a voice tore through the clouds shouting, in deep, stentorian tones to one and all: "It was a Mistake!", campaign offices described themselves as "unperturbed". "Serpents materializing, house pets suddenly called to vocal advocacy, Celestial callings to revise and repent...Vetted" said the spokesman, speaking on condition of anonymity as he was turning into a pillar of salt. "Everything that was vetted was vetted in the vet."
Cite:
Head of State:
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/unsurprised.html
September 3, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think everyone should let her alone; she will shoot herself in the foot eventually . . .
September 3, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP's handling of this entire affair confirms my rather Longview perspective on this pick: Senator McCain flinched.
Of course the Faux Outrage is meant to stir up the base, as was Governor Palin's pick in the first place. Every piece of information flowing from the camp since the unveiling regarding the Shallow Diligence of the pick itself simply confirms the root suspicion that this was a move made in haste and from a position of weakness.
Their handling of the reaction to the rollout isn't the only play designed to hold the base together - the selection of Governor Palin herself was as well. Think about that for a moment. Senator McCain's campaign is not working, in a strategic sense, forward into the Vast Middle or undecided voters: they're working backwards in a late-stage attempt, relatively speaking, toward shoring up a fracturing base - as one galvanizes a base metal to prevent corrosion.
In the great Poker Metaphor of a campaign, Senator Obama saw the bet, and raised it during his acceptance speech. Senator McCain, in response, didn't just show his tell: he outrightly flinched.
September 3, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could it be that Republican hackers have decended on your site
September 3, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feds or Repug?
September 3, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds more like the GOP convention is a funeral wake for McShame and crowning of his heir-apparent before his burial pyre is constructed.
September 3, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, wait, if questioning Palin's experience is sexist, wouldn't McCain questioning Obama's experience be racist?
September 3, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. Your holiday must have cleared your mind.
September 3, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
maybe she can cry a few tears, like Ed Muskie....oh yeah, that didn't go too well, did it....
to hide behind sexism as a response to critiques of the inadequacy of Palin to be VP is even more cynical than the nomination itself. the moral and political contortions of the Republicans are truly breathtaking.
well, having said that, we got four years of Dan Quayle, didn't we? omg!
September 3, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds more like the GOP convention is a funeral wake for McShame and crowning of his heir-apparent before his burial pyre is constructed.
September 3, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
WTF is GOING ON!!!???
I thought this was suppose to be a private family affair? Now we have baby daddy Levi, getting off the MCain plane and boarding the Straight Talk Express with tHe Palin clan.
Now baby daddy and baby momma are going to campaign and all of them are going to appear at the Convention and get cheered on by the Right to Life crowd?
WTF????
Why...they're GLORIFYING an illicit relationship!
Does he have a job? Has he been in jail?
Obviously GOD is not central in their lives!
Where are the parents?
They were not role models to these children, and that's what these two are: CHILDREN!
HOW DARE THEY BE ON STAGE FLAUNTING THEIR SINFUL STATUS!
September 3, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yo, Greg.
I'm on the otherside of the pond. The master entry point from the US is Amsterdam then fans out from there. Everytime I "send" a comment it takes approximately 1 minute. Sometimes the page just stalls and I have to reload the page. And sometimes at oh-dark-thirty in the morning(my time)instead of the normal format that looks like a newspaper page I'll get it in blocks as single entry one right after another; everything horizontal - no vertical columns.
I use VitalAgentIT to monitor my internet connectivity. The last message transaction time was 0:52.2 sec and registered 0.52% loss. Server load packet/sec was 4995. Number of hops were 11. and roundtrip time was 184 msec
Hope that helps you troubleshoot your server problem. I'm logging out.
September 3, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Superb point Maritza.
Polls are starting to show that this time people are noticing that the Democratic candidate is the one who's strong and willing to face the music, and the repug is the whiny little pissant.
September 3, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, m_hulot, but McCain can never be any more a victim than he was at the hands of the North Vietnamese. Let's get that out there on the record, in case the word hasn't gotten around.
September 3, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a more insidious "anti-press" move is underway with the McCain campaign. Their decision to "blame" the media for the many questions being raised about his VP selection, Sarah Pavin is totally misleading.
McCain and his campaign are ignoring the inconvenient truth on how people get their news and information today. The sources are no longer restricted to MSM. The Internet, with all it's flaws has been responsible for raising many of the questions about Palin.
The "media" is not an old-boy system anymore. Sen. Obama has proven that the Internet would change how politics are run, including fund raising.
On-line information/news sources, including blogs will forever be a part of the political landscape. The "Edward R Morrow" question is whether the traditional MSM will stand by and let McCain characterize them as the enemy and scapegoat of McCain's poor selection in this election?
September 3, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
"There's a more insidious "anti-press" move is underway with the McCain campaign. Their decision to "blame" the media for the many questions being raised about his VP selection, Sarah Pavin is totally misleading."
This is true but what's new? I heard "reporters" on three networks use the phrase "red meat" for the RNC vs. "the media." The media (meaning the networks and traditional print sources) were "red meat" for the Republicans. They then bent over backwards trying to give "even" coverage to McCain and company until their lips were brown. Such a hoot.
Re comment problems, Greg. I have similar issues to those already mentioned. The most consistently maddening is the repeated prompt to sign in (after I've already been greeted with my user name). I literally paste in my password and I'm told it's invalid. I punch send again without changing anything and my comment usually slugs in after 2 or 3 efforts.
September 3, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
The tide is turning, now the Repubs are the victims. Oh give me a break, if they want to win they need to stop complaining, and tell how their going to help the American people. Oh wait that's right, the only way they help us is by taking money out of our pockets to pay for their war. I'm sick and tired of the idea that they're the only patriotic ones. I'm not worried though, look at the GOP's convention compared to the Dems. The difference is revealing. Also, does anyone think there could be another moment like 68' beacause the protests are growing and last night they used gas to stop them.
September 3, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stevie kinda reminded me of the teenager in the "Britney Fan Crying" video.
Please don't beg. Here it is. (Caution, high cringe factor):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWSjUe0FyxQ
September 3, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
testing.
i haven't been able to post anything for two days
September 3, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
So I guess Campbell Brown is off the tire swing now for not letting chief crybaby Tucker Bounds talk over her the way Rick Davis talked over Andrea Mitchell's questions a few weeks ago. No more bbq for her.
September 3, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's see, at least one entire network dedicated to getting Republicans elected by sliming Democrats. A nationwide right wing talk show industry dedicated to getting Republicans elected by sliming Democrats. Entire newspaper chains dedicated to Republicans. But the media are angry lefties, unfairly going after him and his fish out of water, who's being filleted rapidly as the oppos and investigators look into what McC didn't bother with before he rolled the dice.
A reporter is persistent in getting an answer from a campaign spokesman to a legitimate question, respectfully asked, and now the Liberal Media Are Mean and McC won't talk to some of them anymore. If he says it, it's true, cuz he's the Straight Talker® maverick and he still has all the principles that gave him his maverickiness.
September 3, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with deLay that the media frenzy amounts to free publicity. I still think everyone should be focused more on the bush-cheney efforts to whip up trouble internationally. Yesterday's jpost reports that dutch intelligence expects the US to bomb Iran before the election. This would change the focus from the economy to the commander-in-chief issue, which is one of the few on which McCain has an advantage.
September 3, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Want to know what I think? Too bad, you're going to hear it anyway.
McCain picked Palin for several reasons:
1. To a small extent, he picked her to try and lure dissatisfied Hillary supporters and women in general, into voting for him. A way of saying, "Look! We've got a woman over here!".
2. For over two years now, McCain has been trying to court the religious right. Remember his famous trip to Liberty University. He went there supposedly to "mend fences", but in reality was laying the foundation for his candidacy by kissing Jerry Falwell's big fat ass. McCain has been trying to win over social conversatives,who have been at best luke warm to him, ever since. Primarily, Palin's selection was an act of desperation on the part of a campaign that appears to lost its bearings, which in fact it never had. Palin appeals to older envangelicals and the conservative base. She's pro life, pro gun, and anti government. Even James Dobson, the hypocrite's hypocrite, endorsed McCain's candidacy after stating that he had no use for McCain but would holld his nose and vote for him rather than see Obama win. That's what McCain desperately needed, since he has no chance without support from christian conservatives.
Palin's selection was not the end product of a long, deliberate vetting process. It was a reflexive act, hastened by the fact that Obama won high praise for his acceptance speech, which was viewed by some 38 million people. The effect has been, from what I've been reading, that many former Hillary supporters, independents and disallusioned republicans have begun to support Obama. That is crushing for the McCain campaign.
Now, McCain finds he's painted himself into a corner. With all of the revelations that have come out, Palin is a liability. If McCain keeps her on the ticket, the GOP will, perhaps force McCain to drop her to avoid being a laughing stock. If McCain dumps her, he loses the base.
I don't believe McCain has a chance of winning this election, but with without the support of the base, he won't even make it close.
September 3, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steve Schmitz' whining about the MSM "feeding frenzy" says more about him than it does the media.
Consider this: Schmitz is purported to be a savvy political operative, an old hand at the game from the Rove school. Why, then, did the press reaction to the "surprise" VP candidate seem to surprise him? If it had been Romney, Pawlenty or Lieberman, those on the supposed "short list" bandied about for a month or so (or a more nationally-known Republican woman like Dole, Snowe, Collins or Hutchinson), the reaction would have been muted. Those were, by this time, prospect which have already been much-discussed by the media.
But by choosing someone entirely unknown by the national media on the even of the RNC, McCain caught them off-guard. That put the media scrambling to catch up trying to find out what it could about her. A lot of issues came up quickly in this attempt, both legitimate concerns and scurrilous rumors. The media had no time in the run-up to announcement to do much in the way of substantive research, which may have exhausted the controversy -- if, indeed, there was no basis for it -- well before the convention.
A seasoned, smart political operative would have realized this. Attempting to throw the MSM off-guard to this extent can only redound into a "frenzy," because it has had no time to go through its customary process of vetting he candidate. The same would have happened had Obama come from left field with his selection, which is why sticking to a predictable VP pick was very much in Obama's interest. There wasn't going to be a "feeding frenzy" on Biden, because he was so familiar to the national media.
Steve Schmitz, you and your man McCain created this scenario by handling the VP selection so ineptly. This has nothing to do with Palin's merits, but with not recognizing beforehand how this would play out. This is a no-no, something experienced professionals simply do not do (akin to a litigator asking a witness an open-ended question without knowing what the answer will be).
If this is an example of the way in which McCain will govern, by unleashing surprises on he media -- and the American public -- without recognizing the potential pitfalls of such an approach, expect a tumultous four years in the White House.
September 3, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink