Big Labor-Backed Group To Unleash Massive Mail Blitz In Swing States Tying McCain To Bush
The AFL-CIO and an affiliated independent group are preparing to unleash an unusually large blitz of mailers targeting at least 1.5 million households in battleground states and across the country -- the group's first foray in a new and all-out campaign to win back Reagan and Bush-supporting Dems in the race's final stretch.
The mailer, which we obtained in advance of its public release, features testimonials from a number of these workers, including a school bus driver and Marine veteran who articulates the campaign's core message: "I voted for George W. Bush because he promised to change Washington. I'm not falling for the same old line from John McCain."
Click on the images to enlarge:
The mailer is the first big move by an outside group called Working America, which gets funding from the AFL-CIO and is the union's affiliate for non-union workers.
Working America is a group that bears watching. It's going to be doing a fair amount of heavy-lifting when it comes to winning back blue-collar "Reagan Democrats" who supported Bush in 2004 and risk being seduced by McCain's claim to being the race's real change agent -- hence the mailer's message.
Working America and the AFL-CIO will blast out the mailer next week to some 270,000 households in the swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, and to another 1.3 million union households in those states and across the country.
"This is a new front in the effort to reach working-class moderates on the pocketbook issues that are critical to them this election year," Karen Nussbaum, Executive Director of Working America, tells us.
"Our members have seen their living standards decline, their communities decay and their economic security disappear," Nussbaum continues. "Yet John McCain still thinks the fundamentals of our economy are strong."
The group -- which claims 2.5 million members in 11 states, including 800,000 in Ohio alone -- plans more mailers and on-the-ground organizing in the weeks ahead.

















AFL-CIO keep kicking ass. Love the slogan:
NO THIRD TERM. NO MCCAIN!
September 17, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thats the only slogan McCain hasn't stolen yet.
September 17, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give him time.
September 17, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL McCain camp calls SNL "Sexist"
Beyond ridiculous now
http://www.accesshollywood.com/was-the-snl-sarah-palin-parody-unfair_video_661641
September 17, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is good stuff.
September 17, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who was in the vanguard of fighting for employer health benefits? Unions. NO UNION AD from now on should EVER fail to stress that McCain wants to tax employer-paid health benefits. Come on, guys! Eyes on the ball!
September 17, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
It does say that "McCain's health care plan will tax health care benefits -- a new tax on working families." Though obviously that's not the header.
What it doesn't say -- presumably because it was put together before the study came out -- is the new estimate that McCain's health care plan would cause 20 million Americans to lose their health benefits and would add $2,000 in annual costs to a typical health insurance premium.
That needs to be out there in big bold headlines, along with a hard number on the extra taxes a typical union member would pay.
September 17, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good stuff.
September 17, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Things look better this week, isn't it?
September 17, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Things look better this week, isn't it?
September 17, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
We kind of knew it would get better. But we've got the last 2 presidential elections to remember too.
September 17, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
They're getting better, man!
September 17, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not for your third grade teacher........
"Things look better this week, isn't it?"
Why yes, yes they does!
September 17, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for the correction and apologies to Ms.Francis (my third grade teacher).
I kinda felt stupid after the event myself.
September 17, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now you know how John McCain feels every day.
September 17, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the desk of Rep. Les Gara, Anchorage, Alaska...
Since Monday the McCain camp has stepped up its personal attacks against Alaskans. They've continued their D.C.-style tactics against neighbors in this small state. The game plan is to find an excuse to stop our Legislature's Troopergate investigation, and hide evidence McCain's folks really don't want to surface before November's election. It's been a little Karl Rove, and parts Laurel and Hardy. How else can you explain the following?
Friday the Attorney General's office promised state witnesses would comply with subpoenas the Legislature issued last week. Tuesday the Governor's Attorney General flip flopped, and announced that state witnesses wouldn't comply because, well, and I'm paraphrasing here - - he's changed his mind. And in what has to be an idea hatched after a 4th Martini at Chilkoot Charlies, Governor Palin's attorneys have filed a motion to dismiss the ethics claim she filed against herself two weeks ago. Yup. She really filed a complaint against herself. Tuesday she said she's discovered, after a thorough investigation of herself, that she's done nothing wrong. Does anyone know how to get a hold of Jon Stewart and Tina Fey?
It's silly season up here in the far north, but this week's moves are aimed at one thing: John McCain's effort to find cover for being disingenuous. See, before Governor Palin's nomination for the Republican VP spot, she did the honest thing. She admitted the evidence -- of roughly 20 contacts between her staff and husband with Public Safety officials, seeking the firing of Governor Palin's former brother-in-law -- might lead a reasonable person to the conclusion that the she misused her office to fire a state employee. So when Alaska's Republican-led Legislature called for an investigation, she did the honorable thing and said she and her staff would comply. She denies any wrongdoing.
Things changed on August 29 when Governor Palin was added to the McCain ticket. Since then his handlers have told her she can't testify. They don't want the evidence in this case to come out. They don't want her to testify under oath. They don't want other witnesses to testify under oath. So they have engaged in daily maneuvers to attack, as disloyal to the McCain campaign, anyone who wants the investigation to move forward. They've now attacked two well respected prosecutors, and perhaps the state's most highly regarded law enforcement official -- the Public Safety Commissioner she hired, and then fired, Walt Monegan.
Every day this week McCain operatives have sung the same tune. Today a guy with an East Coast accent, who knows nothing about Alaska, stood in front of a McCain-Palin banner to lead the attacks against people he doesn't know. At press conferences on Monday and Tuesday campaign staffer Megan Stapleton spit vitriol to repeat her argument that this investigation is really a "Democratic" attack on Governor Palin. See, that's easier than just saying their VP has reneged on her promise to testify. It's easier than just saying they don't want anyone testifying before the November election. It's easier than admitting they are stonewalling a legislative investigation. Oh -- and I know they hate partisan stuff. Yesterday 5 Republican legislators -- all allies of Governor Palin, all supporters of the McCain campaign, filed a lawsuit against the Legislature to stop the investigation.
Here are a few things MCCain's operatives failed to say. There are a few small facts that make it hard to style this as a Democratic investigation. One is that Alaska is a Republican State. We have a Republican Governor and a Legislature of 34 Republicans and 26 Democrats. This summer the Legislature's Legislative Council voted 12-0 (8 Republicans and 4 Democrats) to hire an investigator, and appointed Democratic Senator Hollis French, a well-respected former prosecutor, to find an investigator.
Governor Palin stated she and her employees would comply with the investigation. French then hired Steve Branchflower, a former DA who most recently was hired by legislative Republicans to run the state's Office of Victims rights. And on Friday the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 (2 Democrats and 1 Republican in favor); and the House Judiciary Committee issued a 7 - 0 (5 Republicans, 2 Democrats) advisory vote, to issue subpoenas to witnesses the McCain camp had previously stopped from testifying.
Over the last two days McCain's outside operatives have vilified former prosecutor Hollis French -- as an Obama supporter who must have called this investigation to hurt the McCain ticket. But French was appointed to oversee the investigation by a 12 - 0 Legislative Council vote, and is probably the state's most respected legislator -- by Republicans and Democrats alike. He's so popular the Republican Party couldn't find anyone to run against him this year. They've called former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan -- a Native Alaskan who has served Republican and Democratic Administrations with honor, and put his life on the line in uniform- - "insubordinate." Odd, given that when Governor Palin fired him she offered him a different job. I guess being "insubordinate" was a job requirement for the new position. And they've challenged the independence of an investigator and former DA, who has no animus anyone can find.
Those Swift boat ads taught the McCain folks that if you say something untrue enough times, it can stick. My favorite moment of the week came when Governor Palin's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss Palin's ethics complaint against herself. Stay with me. Her attorneys have been buying the peyote, not me. See, on August 29 they needed to find a way to stop the Legislature's investigation. They tried asking the Republican leaders to call it off, and take one for the team. But the Senate President and others honorably said no. So they came up with an argument that the State Personnel Board -- 3 people appointed by Governor Palin and her Republican predecessor Frank Murkowski - had "exclusive jurisdiction" to investigate wrongdoing by the Governor.
The Legislature wasn't amused. So Governor Palin then filed a complaint against herself. That, they said, put "jurisdiction" in the hands of their friends at the Personnel Board. They argued that since the Personnel Board was now proceeding with an "investigation," the Legislature couldn't. To put icing on the cake, on Monday the Governor's attorneys moved to dismiss the Governor's case against herself. They said, and I loosely paraphrase again -- that they tried really hard and just couldn't find any evidence that the Governor did anything wrong. OK. I can't believe I just wrote that. And I wish it weren't true.
These are the things you have to do when your presidential candidate doesn't want his VP to honor a promise, and doesn't want evidence to come out before an election. These are the things you have to do if your folks aren't going to comply with a subpoena. That's because without spin the headline might read: "McCain Interferes With Investigation Palin Agreed To." How easy it is to re-write a headline. They learned that during the Swift boat campaign too.
All we can hope for is that members of the press will abide by what's taught in journalism school. Not to repeat the spin of political operatives without reporting the truth. Not to write "he said she said" stories, and pretend the truth is somewhere in the middle. But to report the facts. No matter how you spin it, Governor Palin promised to comply with this Legislative Investigation. McCain's folks got her to change her position. And the Legislature that voted for the investigation did so on a bi-partisan basis. End of story. End of headline.
Over the next few days McCain's folks will try to get local legislators to step in line, out of party loyalty, and reverse their vote to investigate Troopergate. But many local Republicans, like Senate President Lyda Green, have so far refused to play those politics. Stay for more from McCain's Campaign for "Change." They've tried to change the truth. They've succeeded at changing Governor Palin's promise to comply with this investigation. Let's see what they'll change next.
Rep. Les Gara, Anchorage, Alaska
September 17, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! That's good stuff. I've been wondering how long the Alaska legislature will allow this fiasco to go on. Governor Palin is making an end run around their authority, and I find it hard to believe they are happy about that.
September 17, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really hope that the debates focus more attention on the health care issue, because this is a real and glaring difference between the two campaigns and yet one hardly hears a word about it. I am hard pressed to believe that most American voters would agree with McCain that the best thing we could do for our health care economy is to bring and end to employer funded health insurance in order to get consumers to pay for it more directly out of their own pockets. If the debate moderators do their jobs and bring this point to the fore, I look forward to watching the sparks fly as a result. Maybe mailers like this will help that process along.
September 17, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain wants to privatize health insurance and make it a welfare program for health insurance companies. Anybody have any confidence in insurance companies today? Why don't they hit these folks with some good old fashioned leftist populist wrath. Obama is so darn bipartisan it makes me sick to the bottom of my 401K.
September 17, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Powerful Obama ad in Spanish:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/17/obama_invokes_rush_limbaugh_in.html#more
Obama-Biden'08: El cambio que necesitamos (The change we need).
September 17, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trade Unions + Democratic policy = stabilty and prosperity,,,,, civil liberties too. Just ask
FDR and Eleanor too.
September 17, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeez, tie him to Keating and Gramm!!!
September 17, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain should immediatly send out a mailer tying Oilbama to the Bush Cheney Energy Bill that Oilbama voted for and McCain voted against.
Thwen he should send a mailer pointing out that Oilbama recieved way more money from the two financial giants now in the news.
First Lehman Bros.
Oilbama raked in $370,524
McCain received $117,500
How about AIG?
Oilbama raked in $75,899
John McCain got $36,875
Oilbama, who supposedly is not beholden to special interests, took three times as much money from Lehman Brothers and more than twice as much from AIG.
Next a mailer on who the now Government financed mortgage broker Fannie Mae give its money to when it wanted to influence a politician? OpenSecrets lists the top three politicians in which FNMA “invested” from 1989 to 2008.
Dodd,Christopher S CT D $165,400
Oilbama S IL D $126,349
Kerry, John S MA D $111,000
Oilbama should immediatly return his ill gotten gains to the American people.
September 17, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for continuing to use the term "Oilbama". It's an immediate flag to me to scroll right on past the rest of your rantings.
September 17, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
me too. I know right sway it's from some 11th hour party on the ballot in a precint in Georgia or something. Nothing to do with GE
September 17, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
But, but, how can he be "Oilbama"?? He's not for immediate off-shore oil drilling. Most confusing.
September 17, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again with the inanity? Those totals did not come from "Lehman Bros" or "AIG." They came from employees of Lehman Bros. and employees of AIG. Whom do you imagine you are fooling with this nonsense?
September 17, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me just add to this. I work for a financial services company headquartered in NYC. Here's the thing. I know from checking public sources that a majority of the top execs in my company are GOP supporters/contributors. The smaller donations come from folks in middle management and below. I was just in a meeting with about 8 other people at my company, ranging from veteran director to young associate....and every one was an Obama supporter. We also, while doing OK relatively speaking, fall below that $250K/year income range. These financial services giants are headquartered in NYC. Given that NYC is - as the GOP tells us - the vice-ridden capital of liberalism, second only to Hollywood, wouldn't you expect the majority of the employees of these companies to be Democrats/liberals. You can work for a financial services company and not be a conservative Republican - it happens...a lot.
What would be more interesting would be to see those contributions broken down by level/position held at the company. I believe I saw recently that at Merrill Lynch, another financial giant in trouble and in the news these days, the GOP/Dem contribution split was about 50-50. Yet one of McCain's top bundlers is John Thain, CEO of Merrill Lynch.
When the Johnny and Jane Schmoes working for a financial services - people like me - contribute to a political campaign (and we have to disclose our employer when we do contribute), it has no effect on the influence my company has with the candidate to whom I'm contributing. And obviously, it doesn't give me any influence either. When a guy like John Thain bundles tens of thousands of dollars for McCain, that certainly can buy some influence.
September 17, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Incidentally, when are you going to stop ripping off Larry Johnson and start coming up with your own points to make? At the very least, don't you think he deserves a mention at the end of your little rants so that he gets the credit he is due as the man who does all of your thinking for you?
September 17, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why did Barry Oilbama vote with GW Bush and Dick Cheney in supporting the Bush Cheney Oilbama backed Energy Bill that gave 9 Billion dollars to Big Oil?
Oilbama represents 4 more years of Bush and Cheney's Big Oil Goverment.
“In an election as important at this, we must choose the candidate who has a proven record of bipartisanship and reforming government, and that’s John McCain,” “We can’t afford a president who lacks experience and judgment and has never crossed party lines to work for meaningful reform. Amid tough economic times and foreign policy concerns, we need someone who is ready to lead. Although I am a Democrat, I recognize that it’s more important to put country ahead of party and that’s why I support John McCain.”
Nobama
September 17, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
After we finish rolling around on the floor roaring with laughter, we get up and wipe the tears from our collective faces.
Yeah, I'm gonna leave energy policy to the party hack who brought us Enron and then de-regulated the financial markets while wailing today that GREED was the problem. Well, now, let's all get busy and eliminate GREED, shall we? How are going to go about that, eh, John?
Care to respond?
September 17, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
When McCain was leading the charge against regulations, as the self-proclaimed "Deregulator," was he putting country first? Nope -- profit first.
September 17, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what Obama himself said about his vote (http://obama.senate.gov/press/050729-_obama_says_energy_bill_helps_/index.php)
WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Barack Obama Friday voted in favor of the comprehensive energy bill, saying it will help Illinois and start America down the path to energy independence by doubling ethanol use, greatly increasing the availability of E85 ethanol pumps, and investing in combination plug-in hybrid and flexible-fuel vehicles, as well as clean-coal technology. However, he warned that bolder action is required if lawmakers are really serious about dealing with the high energy costs that are plaguing American consumers.
"This bill, while far from a solution, is a first step toward decreasing America's dependence on foreign oil," said Obama. "It requires that 7.5 billion gallons of ethanol be mixed with gasoline by 2012. That's 7.5 billion gallons of fuel that will be grown in the corn fields of Illinois, and not imported from the deserts of the Middle East. The bill will also help triple the number of E85 ethanol fueling stations in the next year by providing a tax credit for their construction. This will help the millions of people who already drive flexible-fuel vehicles to fill their tanks with fuel made from 85 percent ethanol that is 50 cents cheaper than regular gasoline."
"I am also pleased that the bill includes funding I requested for research into combination plug-in hybrid and flexible fuel vehicles that could travel up to 500 miles per gallon of gasoline, as well as more investment into clean-coal technology."
The Energy bill will do the following:
- Create a Renewable Fuels Standard that will nearly double the amount of ethanol used by 2012.
- Provide up to a $30,000 tax credit for the construction of E85 ethanol fueling stations.
- Provide a $1.8 billion tax credit for investments in clean-coal facilities.
- Provide $85 million to Southern Illinois University, Purdue University, and the University of Kentucky for research and testing on developing Illinois basin coal into transportation fuels.
- Provide $40 million for research on combined plug-in hybrid and E85 flexible fuel vehicles that have the potential to drive 500 miles per gallon of gasoline used.
- Provide incentives to promote biofuels from agricultural resources.
While voting for the bill, the Illinois Senator also said he believes that the legislation still falls short of what could and should be done to put America on the path to energy independence.
"Although this a step forward, it's not a very big step," said Obama. "The Department of Energy predicts that American demand will jump by 50 percent over the next 15 years. Meanwhile, the conservative Heritage Foundation says this bill will do virtually nothing to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. And it won't reduce the price of gasoline paid by hardworking Americans. Even President Bush and supporters of the bill in Congress concede as much."
"We could have done more today, and we should do more in the future. We must accept and embrace the challenge of finding a solution to our dependence on foreign oil as one of the most pressing problems of our time. It won't be easy and it won't be without sacrifice, but we owe it to ourselves and to our children so that we can bring down gas prices, protect our environment, and strengthen our national security. This should be one of our top priorities in America."
"So, I vote for this bill reluctantly today, disappointed that we have missed our opportunity to do something bolder that would have put us on the path to energy independence. This bill should be the first step, not the last, in our journey towards energy independence."
September 17, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has this ad been covered by TPM yet?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/17/new-obama-pennsylvania-ad-slams-mccain-on-jobs/
September 17, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here it is:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/soldusout_ad/
September 17, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops. That's what I meant to link to. Thanks.
September 17, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fundamentals of the economy is learning to tell the difference between a pit bull, bull market and bull shit.
September 17, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is a great ad and similiar types should be run non stop in battlegrounds
September 17, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lmao this is great :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4avFVDKCIA
September 17, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The next thing he should do is re-introduce the American people to Phil Graham in a new attack ad.
Announcer:Meet Phil Graham
(picture of him picking his nose or something)
Announcer: Yeah that Phil Graham, the one that called you a whiner and said that this is just a mental recession.
(video of former Lehman Brothers employees walking out w/ boxes in their hands)
Announcer:When Phil was in Congress he was the one that spearheaded the fight to De-Regulate the banking and securites industries so that he and his banking buddies could cash in at the American people's expense. It was phil Graham and his cohorts that caused this economic mess we find oursleves in.
(video of gas prices and food prices rising and people on the unemployment line)
Announcer: So when John McCain wanted someone to write his Economic platform, who did he get to do it.....thats right Phil (your a bunch of whiners) Graham.
(Picture of McCain and Phil Graham hugging or something)
Announcer. We can't afford four more years of the same.
Obama: I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message.
Or something like that.
Obama/Biden'08---our last best hope.
September 17, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
O btw its Obama ripping Mccain to shreds with of the best lines fo the campaign
September 17, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting. A young man representing this group came to the door just last week, asking for me by name (I am the registered voter in the household) and then asking who I would vote for in both the Senate and Presidential races. He didn't explain why, seemed to just be gathering information. I'm in Oregon. Wonder if it was part of this particular effort?
September 17, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone needs to check old man McCain's "fundamentals"...
Senility is taking over: http://tinyurl.com/5zr47h
September 17, 2008 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Those CNN polls sure not looking good for Mccain
September 17, 2008 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like this ad but, as is almost always the case with any liberal-leaning group, I don't like the rhetoric in it. Why say that you voted for Bush because he promised "to change Washington." Considering that Obama has effectively grabbed the Change mantle and McCain the 'maverick-reformer' label, why not say Bush promised "to reform Washington."
Why do Republicans constantly KICK OUR ASSES when it comes to basic syntax and rhetorical devices? Why does being honest with the American people have to be so boring?! I thought Obama would be the exception but his ads, and the ads coming from groups supporting him, have not been as impactful as I'd hoped.
September 17, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans do have a smooth way with the "verbage."
September 17, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for doing this mailing. Being a wife of a deceased firefighter I kept hoping that our nation's unions would respond. Without you all in the unions it is hard to get out the message to the working Americans that are still voting their parent's politics that this is a whole new world, a whole new playing field and a whole heap of s**t that we are facing. Been around for a whole lot of the world of politics and have never seen it so bad. My Social Security, Insurance,IRA's, our homes, if we still have them are at risk from the policies of the last 8 years. My grandsons stand to fight in the next years for wars for oil rights and the likes of Blackwater. Wake up and look beyond color as a deciding factor. Obama/Biden 08
September 17, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Briefly getting back to the topic of health care and policy, I’d like to point everyone interested to http://www.yourcandidatesyourhealth.org/ . Both Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain have responded to the questionnaire on topics of health care, reform, and related policies. Take a look at the responses and compare the two approaches! The other presidential candidates have been given the same opportunity to respond, so if you’re interested in their answers email and ask them to complete the questions.
September 18, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink