Poll: National Race Tightening; McCain's Advantage On Leadership Holding Firm
The new Pew poll finds that the presidential race is continuing to narrow, with Barack Obama's lead still holding but much less than it used to be.
The numbers: Obama 46%, McCain 43%, with a ±2.5% margin of error. Last month Obama was ahead 47%-42%, and two months ago it was 48%-40%.
Despite Obama's recent efforts to burnish his credentials on foreign policy, the poll shows McCain continuing to beat Obama on leadership qualities: McCain is seen as more qualified by a 54%-27% margin, and having better judgment in a crisis by a 51%-36% margin.
On the other hand, McCain's "Celeb" ads may not be having their desired effect of painting Obama as culturally out of touch with ordinary people: It finds that Obama leads on the question of who "shares my values" by a 47%-39% margin.















McCain's taken his best shot
Obama's gone bodysurfing
13 days to the DNC and counting
August 13, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, this is a shift of a single point.
Again, I ask you, look up the term 'margin of error.'
Also, how can you say with certainty that the national polls are 'tightening' when both Gallup and Rasmussen show Obama reestablishing a steady lead (despite Rasmussen's new, more McCain-friendly likely voter weighting).
August 13, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gallup 48 - 42
August 13, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
great, I hope it stays that way.
Devastating McCain Video
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/devastating-mccain-video/
August 13, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now watch as RealClearPolitics includes this in their average but not the Gallup poll released yesterday that had Obama with a 7 point lead, 45-38. Of course, they used the goofy USAToday/Gallup poll that showed McCain up by 4 points among whomever they define as likely voters.
From my quick glance at the numbers, seems that Obama's losses and McCain's gains are primarily among middle class (50-75k) and poor (under 30k) whites. In addition, evangelicals (ie - the GOP base) are coming home to McCain, slowly but surely. Obama also lost 4% of white men while McCain gained 5%. Interstingly, Obama only lost 1% of white men and McCain only gained 2%. Obama losing AA and Hispanic males?
August 13, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The USA today ad...over samples whites and undersamples blacks and hispanics in terms of past voter turnout.
In short the groups that support Obama are undersampled and those less likely to support Obama or participate in voting at that high of percentage are oversampled.
So of course Obama is running behind. The polls have been sampled to make it a horserace for the media.
This is the primary all over again, where the media does it's best to make it a horserace.
We have Penn's memos now that show when the media was touting an "HRC comeback" she was actually tanking and it was mathmatically impossible for her to win the number of delegates to become the nominee.
I wonder when this story will be emphasized. After all, she continued to have people send donations when her campaign knew she in no way could gain the nomination.
All, I suppose for the media to be able to have a story to tell and keep us all watching.
These polls are the same way. Just a talking tool for the press to make it sound like the race is very very tight.
August 13, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Still haven't seen McCain get above 43-45 anywhere.
People just don't want to vote FOR him.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 13, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
(1) There's no way to tell if the change in the poll numbers is just noise. It's a pretty small change.
(2) National polls are far less meaningful than state polls at this point. Obama is doing a lot of very targeted -- and tough -- advertising in NV and WI, to name just two. He's leading in CO and AK.
(3) Obama's field operations are wide and deep, but their value -- while crucial to winning -- do not show up on polls this far out.
(4) This time four years ago, Kerry had already exhausted his VP and convention bounces.
August 13, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Urg...Americans are so stupid. How can anyone think McCain is better able to lead in a time of crisis? These same people think the Iraq war was a mistake, and yet they trust the judgment of one of the biggest advocates of that war over someone who opposed it from the beginning? Talk about judgment, apparently American voters have little of it.
August 13, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Joe. Biden.
August 13, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama will do just fine. The debates coming up will do the deal. The debate will expose us to who can really lead American twenty first century economy.
August 13, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
If McCain can’t close the deal at this point, i don't think he will be able to do it by November 2, 2008. The pew poll reminds me of Hillary Vs Obama. Hillary was leading among the leadership quality but still lost the race. The same fate will befall McCain come November.
Obama is winning the likeability factor and this will bode well for him come November despite the negative press he has been receiving for the past 4 weeks.
August 13, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point Gbenga
Yes, she did..she also was touted as best for CinC and still loss.
August 13, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems that 54 represents the best McCain can do in his area of greatest strength; not a good sign when you're opponent has nowhere to go but up.
August 13, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Meanwhile the Gallup tracking poll is widening a tad - up to six points. It's McCain who needs the game-cnager.
August 13, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
make that "game-changer"
August 13, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
National polls don't bare much weight. These polls last year said, Hillary Clinton was going to be the democratic presumptive nominee, and well, that turn not be the case. The state polls is what matters. But i wish these polling companies would poll me, i am a voter too...
August 13, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will people show some restrain in reporting on these polls?! Obama's lead has not "narrowed" by any statistically significant margin. He dropped one point from the last Pew poll, and McCain gained one point. Technically, that is most accurately dismissed as nothing more than statistical noise, not as any notable change in the contours of the race. Let's not get so hot and heavy over little changes in the polls.
August 13, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM is as bad as Fox when it comes to reporting on polls.
August 13, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's just Eric. He doesn't know how to read polls.
August 13, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Couldn't this be statistical noise?
August 13, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
mccain says he knows how to win wars? what war has he ever won?
August 13, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
His divorce.
August 13, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yawn. Call me when Hillary Clinton is debating Guliani, since according to these polls they were going to rout the rest of the field. Is it me, or should Obama take more vacations, before he left +0 Rasmussen, +1 Gallup, today +2 Ras,+6 Gallup- When will these journalists start looking at how in the hell can Obama keep it close in freaking Alaska.
August 13, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's vacation has meant more time spent by the national press actually focusing McCain. I would argue that any day the story is about John McCain it is a bad day for John McCain. The guy just doesn't stand a close look.
In addition McCain came off looking like a cowboy over Georgia. A lot of people responded to reading "We are all Georgians" by saying "holy crap, that SOB wants to get us killed."
August 13, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can somebody tell me....
Which (if any) polls are calling cell phones? It seems to me that a great number of Obama supporters do NOT have land lines, and are being overlooked.
August 13, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
None of them are calling cell phones.
August 13, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
When I look at the pollster.com graphs to the right, I look at the vectors. Obama's trend line has gone flat nationally (albeit still on top), but is upward in the key states of Colorado, Virginia, Ohio and Michigan.
August 13, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think those state trendlines are the most important... It's been said many times before, but this is a state-by-state election. National polls are nice for a snapshot (though it's debatable how good they are in this unprecedented race), but the war will be won or lost in those state battles.
August 13, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
National polls are meaningless.
August 13, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's in the high 40's, and McCain's in the low 40's. Is there a single poll that has shown anything else?
What is remarkable in this election cycle is not the variation in the polls, but the uniformity in them. Other cycles had much more variability than this.
August 13, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain can't get outta the mid-40% range, even while Obama's on vacation! Nobody ever mentions how this supposedly tough, experienced hawkish candidate can't seem to get any traction!
August 13, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not honest to object to a poll because you don't like the result or you wish it weren't the case.
Is is right to object to the interpretation of a poll because the interpretation, by both Pew and Eric, are simple unsupportable.
A poll is a sample. A sample may or may not reflect the underlying population accurately. Leave aside the nature, order, wording of the questions, the weighting of different population groups, the veracity of answers, etc...
Scientifically I have to take many samples before I have confidence that the mean of those samples is a good estimate of the true population preferences. That's what the margin of error tells you.
Since we don't know the true preferences we have no idea if the trend is up or down. It's pure fiction. But again, fiction is what is being sold here.
Suppose the true preferences are the same as the July poll 47-42. That means both the June and August results could simply be random variation from that accurate estimate, well within the 2.5% sampling margin of error. They are only 1 or 2 points off in either direction.
I would recommend looking at the daily tracking polls the same way. They rarely indicate trends, but instead they show the variation around the mean tendency.
Oh why do I even bother....
August 13, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Make. It. Stop.
The reporting on polls on this site is laughably bad, which wouldn't matter so much if it wasn't in such stark contrast with the rest of the site. Has anyone even taken a undergraduate level research methods course here?
If you conducted the exact same poll five different times over the course of say, an hour, on a single day, you WOULD NOT GET THE SAME RESULT EVERY TIME. This has nothing to do with people changing their minds, it simply has to do with the nature of sampling and polling.
In this particular poll, they are saying that the amount of "bouncing around" we would expect is around + or - 3 points. The different data points that the poster mentions are all within that expected range. That doesn't by any means rule out the possibility that it is a true change, but it absolutely rules out definitive statements (e.g. "the race is narrowing") about what the poll means.
This is not rocket science. Every one of these silly posts knocks TPM down in a notch in its respectability as compared to the yammering dolts on 24 hour cable news. If I wanted breathless, statistically ignorant wanking about poll results I'd be listening to CNN.
August 13, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
obama made a huge mistake by appearing in the white girl ads. this pew poll is just the begining of the collapse of his campaign. mccain has exposed him as the elite and full of himself guy he is. americans get it and will not tolerate it. they want a president who is truly american. his candidacy is over.
August 13, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
or in other words, what Economides said.
(sorry, your post much have come up while I was scribbling my own).
August 13, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
"National Race Tightening." I have seen no evidence the national race is tightening. Where is your proof? The polls. They are all about the same and have been for months. McCain is losing. Obama is winning. They are bouncing around a little, but all the bouncing is well within the margin of error. Statistical noise is not proof.
August 13, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the thing- a negative campaign can increase your opponent's negatives (though McLame's ads have been so brainless they don't even seem to be doing that), but will also increase your own albeit by a bit less. This doesn't seem like a very promising strategy for catching up when your own support seems to be permanently mired in the low 40s. I would be feeling pretty despondent right now if I were silly enough to be a Republican.
August 13, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I swear Eric just does this to amuse himself by getting a good exasperated comment thread going. He's a poli sci major and does (or should) know better.
But I'll definitely take exasperated commenters over over handwringing commenters.
August 13, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
All these polls suffer from a new unknown.
There are now significant numbers of people who have caller ID on their land lines and do not answer calls from unknown numbers.
And now these pollers are also, for the first time, calling cellphones - which all have caller ID.
I would suggest that the people inclined to not answer are more likely to be Obama backers.
August 13, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, I don't know if the way you report polls is supposed to be a joke, but you are hurting your credibility and this site's as well. I recommend you spend some time at 538.com to get a sense of how to properly analyze polls.
August 13, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Vast numbers of people actually reached by pollsters decline to participate, and the group most likely to refuse is people over age 65 -- so that offsets the fact that fewer under-30s are reached in the first place.
August 13, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey people: e-mail this link to EVERYBODY you know, right, middle or left -
http://phoenixnewtimes.com/content/printVersion/848709
It is a piece of journalism which could make history, if enough people see it.
August 13, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink