« New McCain Ad: Will "Biggest Celebrity In The World" Help Your Family? | Home | Obama Campaign Hits Back Against New McCain "Celeb" Ad »
Poll: McCain Retakes Lead In Florida
The new survey of Florida by Public Policy Polling (D) shows John McCain retaking a narrow lead in this important swing state.
The numbers: McCain 47%, Obama 44%, with a ±3.5% margin of error. A month ago, Obama had taken a slim lead of 46%-44%.
They key internal number is that Democrats crossing over to vote McCain are disproportionately older white women -- identified in the pollster's analysis as "your prototypical Hillary Clinton supporters."
"Barack Obama still has some work to do getting those folks on his side if he wants to have any chance of winning Florida," the pollster adds.
Advertisement












This just in. Variance within the margin of error in Florida. Panic at 1l:00.
August 6, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only story here is Eric continued ignorance. Prentending to read coherent casual stories into random variation is akin to fortunetelling and tarot card reading. I'm serious. It is a way of exploiting pre-existing mental biases to pretend you are saying something real.
TPM should be ashamed they keep letting Eric embarrass himself. Or is he just trying to insult our intelligence?
Report the numbers, add them to your big list, and cut out the stupid frickin' commentary.
August 6, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Imagine every last democrat in Florida were 100% behind our nominee. Florida would still be a tough hill to climb for us. Bill Clinton lost there in 1992. Al Gore squeaked by (or failed to squeak by, depending on how you care to look at it) in 2000. John Kerry lost soundly in 2004, and there were no palpable party divisions in that year. It is hardly surprising, or even that worrisome, if Obama has trouble in Florida. I never really expected us to carry the state anyway. I would rather win there than lose, but I am not losing much sleep over the prospect that we will not win there. Our success does not hinge on Florida.
August 6, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Even in 1996 Clinton did not win Florida outright. He took 48% of the vote to Dole's 43%, with Perot siphoning off the other 9% (and exit polls showed that 27% of Perot's voters in Florida identified themselves as "conservative" vs 17% identifying themselves as "liberal," suggesting that Perot siphoned more votes out of Dole's reservoir than out of Clinton's). In other words, while Florida is narrowly republican, it is still reliably republican. Anyone who was counting on winning there was setting himself up for disappointment right from the start.
August 6, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Brilliant, Missourit voter! I couldn't agree more.
Though, I think Social Security/ Medicare should be a big emphasis in the Obama campaign as we get closer to November, certainly in FL. That would go far with many a senior voter, I think. Especially given McCain's floundering on the issue.
August 6, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
FL is not the same state it was back then. there are many more people from the midwest and north that aren't conservative republican types who continue to move down here. the state actually has a strong dem base of younger voters (such as myself), non Cuban hispanics and jews that no other southern state has.
whites vote less republican than any other southern state.. the problem is we have a large Cuban population that continues to support republicans in huge #'s. but that trend is softening and they are starting to vote more dem.
Obama most certainly can win FL, especially with the large black voters scattered all over the state. in fact Broward and Palm beach counties are dem 2 to 1. if he can bring out the votes in those 2 counties and not get so crushed in northern FL he can win the state solidly.
August 6, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sure, sure, I am not saying that we should write off Florida entirely. I am just saying (as NC Steve has been eager to remind us), Florida is not going to win this thing for us. If we win Florida, it will be part of a victory so large that Florida will simply be icing on the cake. It is not going to be the state that tips us over from defeat into victory. Ohio might be, Virginia might be, Colorado might be, but Florida will not.
August 6, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dems are still divided over that primary flap.
that was a disaster. we didn't get the Obama exposure like other states, and we didn't get the registration and excitement ahead of the primaries.
all thanks to the legislature and governor for screwing the state.
August 6, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anybody know the where-abouts of Katherine Harris?
August 6, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Florida is a potential sink-hole for Democratic candidates. Obama should contest it vigorously, but not at the expense of states like Ohio, Colorado, etc.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 6, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Florida isn't even a state that people should expect democrats to win.
Delaware GOP, Ting, Booted 4 Secretly Supporting Obama
August 6, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gordon Smith is from Oregon...and party "committee" members should support their party's candidate.
August 6, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't BOTH polls withing the margin of error?
What this says to me that Florida will be close now matter what.
August 6, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's always close. We never win it. Clinton only "won" it by a plurality in '96 because Perot sucked the life out of the campaign juggernaut that was Bob Dole.
We are never going to win there if its close enough to steal. Its the one state where the Republicans have both the means, the will, the tools and the historical willingness to do it.
If we have to win Florida to win, we're already hosed. That's the real lesson of 2000 and 2004.
But all that said, its a great place to bleed McCain and, for that reason alone, is worth putting a lot of money into after the conventions. McCain has to hang on to it and he knows it will be close. He cannot afford to be blase there and take the breezy "oh well, if we lose there we're hosed anyway" attitude he's shown in some of the other Bush II states where Obama's building a ground game.
He knows he has to keep it. That's why his SE regional HQ there.
And that, by the way, is a potentially catastrophic blunder. His whole "regional HQ" strategy is flawed because it basically ignores the GOP's biggest strength in '00 and 04, which was its ground game. He's running "must win" states out of these regional HQ's rather than putting Guccis onto the ground in those states. By putting his regional HQ's in a few "must win" competitive states (his Atlantic Coast HQ is in Virginia), he's basically ensuring that his "regional" HQ's will turn into missnamed state HQ's.
McCain is still running North Carolina from Florida. NC is as must win as Florida, it is as much in play as Florida and he has no ground game here. None. No field offices, no state HQ, nothing. He's not even running it out of the regional HQ in Virginia, which is next door.
On the other hand, I did actually see my McCain bumper sticker ever today, and the car was being driven by an angry looking older white woman, so I guess I should be having a panic attack.
August 6, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama-Clinton '08.
Let's get her on the ticket already. I mean come on, Barry, Bill & Hill on the campaign trail united as one? Who could stop that?
Nobody. That's who.
August 6, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whomever he picks, I will be content with that ticket and enthusiastically support it. I guess, however, that I will be very surprised if Sen Clinton is chosen.
August 6, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno. I wouldn't be shocked if, after all these trial balloons and name-of-the-week games are over, Obama circles back to Clinton. No-one's expecting it, right? Makes me think it might happen.
August 6, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is not a single VP candidate who brings more to the table than Hillary Clinton.
Any animosity between Barry and Bill could be stamped out with one sit down. Bill's just got a big ol' Leo heart like me and he's still hurting, but he'll gladly fall in love with you if given the opportunity. Obama (also a Leo, btw) and he are so much alike. It could get squashed and they'd become the best of friends.
Let's get it done. There is no other choice.
August 6, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe, maybe not. I take no strong position one way or the other on that question. Still, even if I concede your point for the sake of argument, to say that she is the best candidate is not the same as to say that she is the most likely candidate. I stand by my earlier claim that I will be perfectly content, but totally flabbergasted, if she is chosen.
August 6, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're right. There is not a single VP contender who brings more baggage to the table.
August 6, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did anyone else note in the demographics that McCain is leading women by 12%. Either that is a typo or the poll is seriously flawed...even more so than other polls.
August 6, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe it's just me, but I'd like Democrats to cede Florida. Let's just call it a red state, and move on. The Florida Democratic Party is a mess, the state can't handle a simple democratic election process, and they elected Jeb Bush, twice, and George W Bush, twice.
The state, in my opinion, is not the best judge of Presidential quality.
Florida has consistently chosen lousy Presidents. Maybe it's time to just hand it to the lesser nominee and work harder elsewhere.
I'd be thrilled if it had less national prominence. It seems to be racing towards the bottom, and dragging down the mean.
August 6, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's disgusting. Just give up on Florida? Barack Obama can't afford to give up on ANYTHING, that's why he implemented the 50 State Strategy in the first place. He has to get any state he has a chance of winning and these margins are far too close to just give up.
I tell you what would really help him cover all 50 states, Hillary and her husband campaigning all over the nation and spreading the word that the economy of the 90's is on it's way back.
August 6, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Florida should be driving the country, or Obama's agenda.
A state that votes for two Bush's, twice, isn't a swing state. It's a red state.
Put it in the Mississippi column and move on.
August 6, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
The last time a majority of Florida voters voted for a Democrat was 1976.
August 6, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
if you want the veep to help in florida, choose bob graham (former gov, senate intel chairman, opposed the war) or rendell (jew)
August 6, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
i still say wes clark, cause it would piss mcWar off to no end. fireworks ensue.
August 6, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why choose a man that only helps with a single state? That's the beauty of an Obama-Clinton ticket, it's not just gunning for one state but a slew of them spread out across the country. Also helps secure a few that we might think Barry has on lock but could be taken from his grasp.
August 6, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
support for graham would extend to everyone put off by O's "lack of experience", also help antiwar folks feel like they're included. as far as rendell, PA seems contested also, so there's 2 states to start. i know rendell's support comes from philly and pittsburgh, but still he might help with joe (white) sixpack. also, rendell's a clintonite of sorts, might help with hillary supporters. ditto for clark, who singlehandedly demolishes mcCain's advantage on millitary issues, also opposed to the war. though that valedictorian thing probably won't help, alas.
August 6, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
and really, what states will hillary help deliver. FL? PA? rendell does that, and won't drive up GOP turnout either, like hillary might.
August 6, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
and graham and rendell being (ex-) governors is good too.
August 6, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Add 5% to a partisan poll and McCain leads by 8%.
August 6, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
So that means Obama is actually up by 6 in the Republican Rasmussen tracking poll, right?
August 6, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
SENIOR women.
August 6, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
for gymrat23 up there.
August 6, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's going to have to swing hard Right on Iran to win Florida, abandon all environmental issues, and pander to the evangelical "true south" part of the state. Florida has a GOP governor who has already indicated he'll do or say nearly anything to promote McCain, including getting engaged.
Is it worth it to change the whole platform to have a squeaker election in a state that hasn't managed to figure out how to print a ballot? A state that celebrates the Bush Family as some kind of royalty? A state where the House Democrats who hail from there regularly kowtow to Republicans to hang onto their seats?
August 6, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
He doesn't have to change anything. Florida is more ripe for the picking than at any other time in the past. It's not the same old state that we're used to, there have been significant changes in the demographics and an Obama-Clinton ticket is good to go in Florida.
August 6, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. I know it bolsters your view that Hillary should be the VP pick, but I've heard that song too many times before.
August 6, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to get Mccain voting record on GI issues and his stance on S.S It was same plan that Bush purposed. Add to that FL has a had a high amount of people lose there homes.Get Mccain and his good buddy Phils remarks about the housing crisis on the air.
August 6, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The key internal number is that Democrats crossing over to vote McCain are disproportionately older white women -- identified in the pollster's analysis as "your prototypical Hillary Clinton supporters."
Two words repeatedly endlessly -- not by Obama --but by women surrogates in Florida such as Debbie Wasserman Schultz:
Sturgess, Topless, Sturgess, Topless, Sturgess, Topless, Sturgess, Topless, Sturgess, Topless, Sturgess, Topless . . . .
What kind of man would subject his wife to such a public and humiliating joke?
August 6, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
FL most certainly should be contested. did any of you even read the internals? 76% of dems support Obama. that is a number we need to improve on and WILL IMPROVE ON.
if he can get 88% of dems he wins FL.
August 6, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rasmussen is no longer a partisan outfit.
BTW, SurveyUSA shows McCain ahead by 6% in Florida.
August 6, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's not panic people. Florida is a natural swing state. The older population is a plus for McCain.
Hillary could be an asset here, send it on tour.
Also, push the young and hispanic turnout to counter this disadvantage.
Ground game will be the defining aspect of this election. You can quote me on that. I could be wrong but I think that time will prove me right.
August 6, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it a swing state, though? Why battle for the single state that has a built-in McCain Machine, honed through the nearly endless Florida Loves Bush(s) Years?
McCain has no ground operation. Charlie Crist will hand him Jeb's.
I'd contest Florida if it didn't have a GOP governor, and an absolutely comically hapless state Democratic Party, see: snookered on their own Primary. As it is, it's McCain's best shot. It's a waste of time and money.
Florida needs to concentrate on building a Democratic base and working Democratic infrastructure. Obama isn't going to be able to turn Florida in 90 days, and the thought of the whole country depending on the outcome of the wisdom of Florida voters is not a happy thought.
August 6, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe you're right, but that doesn't mean that we can't try.
The money, the resources, the excitement, the issues, the truth, everything is our side.
Let's take the chance, without forgetting that Florida is part of a bigger strategy.
August 6, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is from TPM front page:
All or Nothing
From a friend in DC Republican circles ...
"I think you may be missing a key element of McCain's strategy. Remember, he has NO national ground game to counter Obama's vaunted field organization. No Bush-style 72 hour GOTV operation, no large and disciplined staff -- just a small core staff and media operation..."
I rest my case.
August 6, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bottom line is simple; he who has the best get out to vote wins the election. Florida is going to be a swing state but Obama shouldn't rely too much on it.
In fact, i'll argue, Obama should focus more on these states like VA, OH, CO, IN, MT and NM. He has a great records with the farmers and that is a winning issue in these states mentioned above
August 6, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's not forget the Barr factor. Northern Florida is quite conservative and culturally much like southern Georgia. I've seen Barr with as high as 5% in GA, if he pulls even half that in FLA he could push the state towards the Dems. Of course being FLA, any outcome is possible.
August 6, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Florida is a Blue State. Blue Haired old white people who still can't imagine some uppity black man running our country. I know it is easier to blame the misguided Hillary supporters who are now pro-life.
August 6, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the poll is accurate as to age, they may be "pro life" because they are beyond the age where it's an issue for women.
Obama wins in state's where he or Democrats have an organizational advantage. Obama will be able to "borrow" the Democratic machines Clinton relied on to carry PA and OH.
Florida has a REPUBLICAN machine. They'll lend it to McCain.
August 6, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
While Oilbama has NO CHANCE to win in Florida, they of course remeber him disenfranchising their votes to steal delagates from Hillary, Oilbama was successful in voting for the 2005 Energy Bill, written in secret by Vice President Cheney and the energy lobby. Thomas Friedman referred to the bill as “the sum of all lobbies.” U.S. PIRG noted that the bill’s “heavy tilt toward big oil companies reflects the influence of Exxon Mobil and other oil companies on policy-makers in Washington, DC.”
August 6, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama doesn't have to win Florida to win the white house. If he can steal two of these states, OH, CO, NM, NC, VA and GA, and combine it with the states Kerry carried.
I’ll say mission accomplished.
August 6, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink