« Hess "Driver" Maxed Out To McCain | Home | Election Central Morning Roundup »

Poll: McCain Ahead In Florida


A new SurveyUSA poll gives John McCain the lead in the perennial swing state of Florida -- a state where recent polls have given contrary outcomes, and which is sure to be closely contested through this November.

The numbers: McCain 50%, Obama 44%, with a ±3.8% margin of error. Age seems to be a factor here, with the internals showing Obama ahead 48%-46% among votes under the age of 50, but McCain ahead 53%-41% among voters over 50.


Comments (92)

That's why Obama has to be on the offensive--not on the defensive. Americans saw him being bitch-slapped by McCain for an entire week, and that's what happens.

I just called the campaign and asked them to go on offense:

http://strategy08.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/i-just-called-the-obama-campaign-and-so-should-you/

avatar

In the latest Zogby national poll released today, Obama's 7 point lead is gone. He is now behind McCain by 1 point.

Obama: If they bring a knife, I'll bring a gun.

Yeah, right. I'm in shock watching my candidate and his campaign act as if they're afraid to go on offense. It's so demoralizing.

"Yeah, right. I'm in shock watching my candidate and his campaign act as if they're afraid to go on offense. It's so demoralizing."

I'm in shock that you are stupid enough, especially after seeing Zobgy's performance in the primaries, that you would believe their poll numbers at all.

avatar

I guess every poll must be wrong, huh. Since every poll shows Obama losing ground. You've got your head in the sand if you think Obama isn't in trouble.

And by the way, Zogby got several primaries right when others did not--IN, NC, MO, NV. They screwed up a few--just like every other pollster.

"I guess every poll must be wrong, huh. Since every poll shows Obama losing ground. You've got your head in the sand if you think Obama isn't in trouble."

..you must have your head up your ass if actually you believe what you just stated - it being August, and judging by the state polls and all.

P.S. didn't mean to imply they care what I think, just hoping the more people call the more they get the message.

just diaried this on Dkos.

avatar

Obama has been on a downward slope since last March. Thank God for all those caucus states otherwise we wouldn't be here. Now in the real world, I thought it couldn't get any worse than last week and how do we begin this week? Obama introduces his flip flop energy plan and President Clinton tells us what he really thinks. Guess what has been the big story? Polls at the end of this week anybody?

avatar


hanksf


Obama has not been on a downward spiral since March. He hit his low point in March and since has enjoyed a 5.5% lead until now. Similar to the 2000 and 2004 elections.

There are 92 or 93 days left until the election.

In 2000 Bush held a 6 point lead over Gore with 107 days to go. Gore moved up to take a 3 point lead with 56 days left. Bush reversed Gore's lead and led with 3 points during the last 3 weeks. Gore won the popular vote by 0.6 points.

In 2004 Kerry slowly built a 2 point lead by this time and held a small lead through-out the summer. With 50 days left Bush took back the lead by 4 points. Although Kerry gained 3 points he lost by a 2.4% margin.

So Obama is not in trouble. This is the ebb and flow of polling. He'll get his mojo back. Not to worry..... Furthermore polls are not predictions; they are simply a snap shot in time.

Ouch - McCain hit the 50% mark there with a credible polling organization.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

avatar

Survey USA is far from credible.

they cant even get the demographics right!

Through a "likely voter" filter in early August, i.e. it is biased against younger voters and weighted in favor of voters who have a solid voting history and purport to be following the campaign closely or whatever other undisclosed hoodoo they use their screen.

avatar

Don't forget Obama has spent a fortune in Florida, McCain not a cent.

avatar

This seems to be an ongoing problem for SurveyUSA and it makes me wonder about the accuracy of their polling. Do they REALLY believe that McCain is going to get 16% of the African-American vote?

avatar

Can you guys just settle down and trust the campaign that took down the political dynasty that was the Clintons? Do you really think you know better than they do? They have run a stellar operation. Just be patient. Besides, FL would totally be gravy in the electoral college scheme of things. The map is big - he doesn't need to win FL.

One thing I would appeal with these older voters would be social security. How can they vote R on that issue?? Also, my dad is 72 and a natural McCain supporter (life long R, Vietnam figher pilot, lives in AZ) but he seems to ready to hand over the reigns to the next generation. He is likely to vote for Obama. I don't know how you convince people to let the country move on, but my dad is ding his part. Seems like maybe some older folks would look at McCain's performance as it related to age, and decide the younger guy really should have at it.

avatar

TaraV, your opinion was probably very important to your dad.

And that's my recommendation for everyone who reads this who has grandparent(s). Call them or go visit them;tell them how important Obama is to the future that you want--emphasize that YOU. Tie Obama's goals with how you want to live your life now and in the future.

Don't attack McCain. Explain how Obama's goals are aligned with yours. This works.

I agree with you - the first thing I thought when I read Erik's post was - someone needs to go explain to the nursing home residents what would happen if McLame was elected.

Way to turn on the charm and win those senior voters! Tell me, is arrogance a pre-requisite or is it optional in the Obama world?

More Troll Jizz.

Well said, Ms V. From the way folks are squawking here, you might imagine that the whole point of the campaign is to be ahead in the polls in August. It is not. The point is to win the right combination of states in November. McCain is using up all of his ammunition months before it can matter, and yet somehow this leads HankSF (et al) to the conclusion that we are the ones in trouble. I am just not seeing it.

avatar

I agree on the questionable nature of the 16% black for McCain number. I also find it unlikely that Obama will fare worse among women than among men anywhere, which this poll says will happen. However, SUSA is a very good pollster, so it's sort of hard to pick it apart.

avatar

They blew the African-American vote totals in Indiana and I think Pennsylvania--pretty badly actually. Vastly overstating what Clinton ultimately received.

avatar

1--Strange that McCain is up more among women than men. That bucks the trend in almost every state and almost every poll.

2--More interesting is their partisan breakdown. Does the Republican Party in FL really have a 5 point ID advantage over the Dems?

avatar

This poll is flawed, 16% AA for Mccain? On what freaking planet do they get that BS from? Also the latino vote Obama only by 6%? That seems very shaky given his large lead nationally.

As super noted the party ID breakdown is complete BS given the current political climate. This Poll is just not believable.

avatar

Two words: Cuban Americans.

avatar

good points superchimp, but regardless its interesting to see movement in the plus 50 bracket, race baiting anyone?

avatar

Took this straight from Survey USA's breakdown:

Hispanics favor Obama by 60 points.

If that is true then how do they show a 48-42 spread? This poll is dodgy to say the least. I bet they used 04 turnout models as well. Also Mccain will not break 5% AA in any state and I doubt he will be within 10 on Hispanic vote in any state either. Couple that with higher AA turnout and to me this poll at very wrost is dead heat. One last thing maybe I am wrong but I seriously think Republican turnout will be depressed and thus will elevate other groups overall % of the vote. There are no big moral issues this time and Mccain's evangelical bona fides are weak.

avatar

Btw, I think the 60 point comment is a typo.

avatar

actually hispanics in FL vote more republican than usual hispanics cause of the cubans.

bush won by 12% in '04 over Kerry. and won whites by 15%.

so Obama being up 6% among hispanics is very strong. and down just 19% among whites is fine. i dont see how it translates to a 6% mccain lead.

if Obama merely SPLITS the hispanic vote he wins FL.

i think survey USA sucks major ass

avatar

Pub nope they are counted as Hispanic. Survey USA like Ras has been following an overall trend of giving Mccain 10% or more of AA vote, this is also evident in their recent Missouri poll that gave Mccain 22%, which is a complete freaking joke.

avatar

I stand corrected. Thanks jessran.

avatar

"Age seems to be a factor here, with the internals showing Obama ahead 48%-46% among votes under the age of 50, but McCain ahead 53%-41% among voters over 50."

The old school wheelchair crowd seems to be in the bag for McCain, then? Oh, the sky is falling...

You'd think the old timers would realize how tired they get in their daily lives and realize being President isn't for the senior citizen crowd, unless your second term is winding down.

avatar

I wouldn't discount this poll too hastily. Florida has always been a somewhat dubious prospect for Obama for one simple reason: whites over 60 are going to favor the old white guy, period. Remember that these folks were all teenagers or adults under Jim Crow and segregation. Obama is not going to win the majority in this group no matter what he does or what John McCain does. And in the 50 - 60 crowd, he'll probably only manage a draw with Mccain; those folks were teenagers and young adults right after segregation and Jim Crow, and it fucked a lot of them up, too.

In what state do over-60s make up the largest percentage of the population? If Florida isn't #1, it's close to it.

Now, look at who they surveyed. 57% of respondents were over the age of 50. A whopping 62% are over the age of 47. A full 54% of the survey was of people older than John McCain. And that makes sense, because those are the folks who still have landlines. And is anyone really surprised that old white women (remember, they outlive men, so they may have been similarly over-represented in this survey of ancients) are not supporting Obama in a southern state? Where y'all been hiding?

So while the survey grossly oversamples really, really old people, they are the ones who turn out to vote in droves. Hey, they've got nothing better to do. So I don't think you can completely discount it on the basis of oversampling old farts. But really, about the best that can be said for it is that it lacks a lot of really vital information that would make the data they've collected meaningful and of true value as a reliable predictive device.

avatar

Did I mention that the majority of the people in this survey were really, really old? As in older than even John McCain? Wanted to be sure I was clear on that point.

avatar

Do they (72+) constitute 54% of the Florida registered voters?

Did I mention that the majority of the people in this survey were really, really old? As in older than even John McCain?

Both of them???

I can see that there's strong PUMA support behind McCain in FL.

They'll change when we our Vice president is chosen.

avatar

another crappy Survey USA poll.

first off white voters DO NOT make up 73% of the electorate. they were 70% in '04 and with the growing numbers of hispanics and black registration it will be more like 66%

second off republicans DO NOT outnumber dems by 5%. its the opposite.. dems outnumber republicans by 5%.

that is a 10% swing right there.

Survey USA sucks

avatar

To your point on party identification:

http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2008/jul/11/democrats-register-four-times-more-voters-republic/

Statewide, Democrats made up just over 41 percent of the 10.45 million voters in May compared to the 37 percent registered Republican - a gap that has stayed roughly the same and hasn't delivered many statewide victories to Democrats in recent years.

Democrats had a similar edge, 4.3 million to 3.9 million, in 2004 when Bush defeated Kerry by 380,000 votes.

There's information in those tubes!

avatar

okay so dems outnumber republicans by 4-5% exactly what i said.

Survey USA seems to think republicans outnumber Dems by that margin.

it should be vice versa.

avatar

Among old white people, Republicans most certainly do outnumber Dems...at least in southern states like Florida. They oversampled really really really old people, and as you pointed out, white people were oversampled too, but specifically, old white people were oversampled.

avatar

Who knows? The way they've presented the data makes it impossible to tell. They have a line titled "composition of likely voters", which is suggestive of the number in each age group who actually show up to vote...in that line, it shows over 65's at 30%. But it's impossible to tell how they arrived at final numbers. If, for example, they've first grossly oversampled really old people, and then magnified that by counting 30% of them to derive final numbers, while undercounting people under 50 and applying their lower turnout numbers (27% for middle aged cohorts and 17% for young adults), you can see how you'd be magnifying a the oversampling of the old folks even more. It's unclear to me, anyway. They need to show their work, as your math teacher used to say.

avatar

Damn you TPM comments system! That was a reply to Publicola Hussein.

avatar

It isn't hard to understand when you factor in the type of people you find down here. The Sunshine State, home of the giant Confederate flag, Intelligent Design believers and abstinence advocates. State legislators who propose christian license plates and church leaders who surf porno sites on their computers at church and others who screw members of their own congregation be boy, girl or the deacon's wife.

Sometimes I find it difficult to communicate with people whose answer to the problems "we" face, (We as individuals or we as Americans or we as citizens of the world) is to "leave it in god's hand.

avatar

Florida: God's Waiting Room

(That's from Family Guy)

Sorry, I have to use it.

avatar

Ok, in answer to your question, no. No, they don't.

To be specific, 31.3% of Florida registered voters are 60 or older. They don't give the number for age 72+, but it's gotta be 25% or less.

This poll oversamples this age group by over 100%.

avatar

it seems like they polled just landline phones and were only able to reach retired old farts.

if you are gonna blast Zogby for his bad polls in the past, you damn well better do the same to these guys and hold them accountable.

they put out way too many polls using shoddy polling

avatar

Survey USA had McCain beating Obama by 5% in massachusetts.. no joke back in January. and had the race a tie as late as March.

with mccain winning 30% of dems!!


THEY SUCK PERIOD.

anyone who says these clowns are a good polling firm must work for their PR department.

the only pollster i actually respect as far as state polls is rasmussen and quinnipiac! cause they sample enough people and tweak the demographics so its accurate.


84% support for Obama among Blacks is not enough??
Do you really expect every single black person to vote for Obama?

Through the Bush Years, I argued with many black floridians who were were unashamed republicans. In an effort to distance themselves from African Americans, many Caribbean professionals gravitated to the GOP. Tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts is all they cared about then. And tax cuts, cuts, cuts is all they care about now.

Pocketbook republicans who dont give a shit about historical moments or symbolic votes.

Lets not discount this poll out of hand, it does reflect a trend.

I remember when the Swift Boat ads first came out in 2004 thinking that there was no way they would stick. But they, combined with all the other things like windsurfing, etc., stuck. Death by a thousand cuts. We are seeing it now, with the Brittney/Paris and Moses ads.

In any event, Obama needs to go on the offensive and do so in a nasty way. Hillary would have done it. I'm sure she would have found a way to answer some question thusly: "I don't know if McCain is too old to be president." Has Obama done anything along those lines?

avatar

am not one to look for sample problems in every poll that is released, but do note that the partisan breakdown is 43% Republican and 38% Democratic. That's an improvement for the GOP over 2004, despite the fact that most polls find a significant swing leftward and the fact that Florida Democrats have made significant registration gains. In the previous SUSA poll from Florida, Democrats had a 9% edge in the sample; the latest PPP poll had as many Democrats and Republicans and the latest ARG poll had a 5% Democratic advantage. This is not to say that SUSA's poll is wrong - I don't like cherry-picking polls, and a lot of problems have problems like this. But I am just pointing out something we should take into account when interpreting the results.

More at Campaign Diaries

avatar

Another issue: they also undersampled lower income voters.

63% of survey respondents make over $50K per year. Just under 40% of registered Florida voters do. So they've oversampled higher income people by over 50%.

And what was the poll within the last couple of days that showed Obama 10 points ahead of McCain among lower-income voters? It was reported here at TPM but I don't remember the specifics.

This poll is pretty useless.

avatar

BK dude get a grip if HRC was struggling to break 10% and hell even 5% in some states you honestly expect Mccain to get 16%? Seriously that is a BS number and this is the same poller that showed Mccain getting 22 freaking % of AA in Missouri.

Did the DNC really think they were going to win FL after their little 1/2 vote fiasco?

Obama was the 4th highest vote getter in the FL primary. Even Romney got more votes. Why is it such a surprise he isn't winning now?

I know, Obama didn't campaign, it wasn't a fair election blah blah. If you say it enough times maybe just maybe it will make it true.

avatar

To answer each of those inane questions in order:

Did the DNC really think they were going to win FL after their little 1/2 vote fiasco?

You're projecting. Florida Democratic voters didn't get a case of the vapors from the whole issue the way diehard Hillary supporters such as yourself did.

Even Romney got more votes. Why is it such a surprise he isn't winning now?

As you've just alluded to, Democratic voters in Florida were told before the primary that their votes would not count. Most of them stayed home meaning that - watch the magic of math at work here! - a lot more Republicans participated in their state primary in Florida than Democrats, who had already been told their votes wouldn't count.

Obama may well not be winning in Florida, not for any of the ludicrous suggestions you've made, but thanks to its high population of elderly. But as to whether or not he's winning? You wouldn't be able to prove it by this poll because of all the obvious flaws that I and others have pointed out. And certainly not because you're a dead-ender who can't accept that your candidate didn't win the primary.


I dismiss this poll
out-of-hand.

so sue me.

avatar

If another poll days ago gave Obama the lead (narrow)and now this one comes up, it means that is too close to call. Just the 16% for McCain in african-american makes this poll an outliar, like the one who gave McCain 10 points ahead in Ohio.

Florida will be too close to call, given the fact that most old voters will probably go republican and most hispanics will go for Obama.

This election, honestly, it's impossible to poll.
The dynamics are so different today that makes hard to measure the real numbers. Once again, the ground game will the defining aspect of this election.

PD: In recent years, more hispanics of other nations are settling in Florida, so the dominance of Cuban Americans is not as strong as it was.

Folks, I'm a huge Obama supporter and have been an optimist in the face of pessimism expressed by my family and friends. But can we stop saying, "Don't pay attention to the polls", and, "This is an outlier", or, "This can't be right", and admit that our candidate, almost inexplicably - unless we admit that gutter campaigning works - is bleeding support? We can't stop denying the reality. And as impressed as I was with Obama defeating the Clinton machine, the GE is a whole different ball game.

He's losing indies left and right and his Dem base support is stagnant. One of the main arguments in the primary was that Obama could win over more indies than Clinton and winning indies is how you win elections. I'm not saying that was an incorrect analysis - Obama would probably still draw more independents than Clinton. But right now, they're flocking to McCain.

Let's not ignore reality. We've got problems. And I'm not just talking Flordia, which I conceded months ago. I'm talking overall trends.

And it's now August 4, not June 6th. Not much time left.

Go ahead and call me a chicken little, but these trends are disturbing. If Obama's rock star tour of Europe didn't give him a big bump, is the Dem convention going to make much of a difference? Is picking Bayh or Kaine or Sebelius going to make indies stand up and say, "hey now!" Is he really going to blow away McCain in the debates.

Obama can't go into October - just two short months away - facing a statistical tie with McCain. That's not going to do it.

avatar

He has a problem ? He is losing independants ? Disturbing trends ? BECAUSE OF THREE DAYS OF BAD POLLS AND A WEEK OF TOUGH ATTACKS ?

For fuck's sake !

So what turns it around? What do they do when next week's round of tough attacks come?

As for Obama's message today on on energy? Let's take a look at some of the headlines I was able to capture from the Web:

"Energy Pimping" (Kevin Drum)
"Obama, in Shift, Urges Tapping Oil From U.S. Reserve" (NY Times)
"Barack Obama shifts on tapping national oil reserves" (LA Times)
"Obama: Open Oil Reserves: Call to tap strategic reserves is second shift the Democrat has made in the past week on energy" (WaPo)
"Obama backs some drilling, tapping oil stockpile" (AP)

All of these headlines highlight Obama's "shift" - in GOP/media speak, "flip-flop" - on key positions re: drilling and the strategic reserves. Nothing about the other aspects of his energy plan. It smells of "typical politician". And when indies weigh two "typical politicians" against each other, and one is a virtual unknown and the other is a known quantity but not necessarily a guy they really like, the "safe" guy looks better and better, even if they don't like him all that much.

I'm convinced that Obama's appeal with indies was exactly the fact that he was different. The more he compromises, the more he moves to the center, the more he looks like, well, McCain, the more independents are going to move towards the guy they know. And this isn't about FISA - nobody but us lefties and the hardcore libertarians care about that.

The Obama camp needs to do a better job of defining McCain...and I'm obviously no genius for saying this. The media isn't going to help so they need to figure out how to do it. Sadly, some novel and nasty attack ad that gets the idiots in the DC pundit class to say, "wow, that's someting I can talk about on the teevee for hours without having to know anything about the issues", may be the only way to do it.

avatar

There will be no real bump from the convention. Believe me. The Republicans will be working all month long to see to that and painting Obama as a celebrity is the first strike against the crowd of 75,000 at Invesco.

John McCain isn't in charge of his campaign anymore. It's Karl Rove and he knows every trick in the book. If Obama doesn't want to unleash Axelrod then he's going to lose.

It'll be alot easier to counter the celebrity crap when he's talking to a U.S. audience. Reframe it right there on the spot, when millions of people are watching. Toward the beginning of the speech, after visibly taking in the crowd, maybe casually throw in something like: "John McCain thinks there's something wrong with a crowd like this. But I gotta tell ya, I kinda like gettin' together with my fellow Americans." Then mention a few people in attendance who are from different states and different walks of life. Let people know it's a crowd of "ordinary" Americans.

Oh God does this mean Obama lost the electioN????????????????????????

Seriously, folks. Even if we can't help obsessing over polls in early August, can we remember that negative character attacks tend to provide a short-term bump but are often accompanied by long-term increase in negatives for the attacker? It's been like a few days. Nothing wrong with discussing strategy, but give this some time to play itself out before we start writing the Obama campaign's obituary. The press on McCain's recent ads is becoming increasingly negative already. And three months is an eternity on the campaign trail.

No matter what Obama does, there will be more rough patches between now and then, if for no other reason than the MSM will make sure of it. Might as well work on growing a thicker skin now.

I'm not writing his obituary. This thing is - or should be - Obama's race to lose. However, do you think the media - even though they are "disappointed" at the turn the McCain camp has taken - will ignore the sure-to-come future McCain/Rove attack ads to focuse on the issues? Again, scurrilous attack ads = easy journalism. Covering issues = hard...and McCain might not let me sit in the Straight Talk cabin of his plane!

As I sit in my NYC-metro area ivory tower, I have no idea how this is playing out in the states that will matter in November. I hope that the local media in those battleground states isn't as vacuous as the national media. And I hope Obama's ground game - which can gain strength virtually undetected by the national media and most polls - will make the difference.

Didn't mean you specifically there, of course. And, like I say, I'm all for weighing in on strategy. To some extent, that's kind of what we're all doing here. For the sake of debate, though:

I don't think they'll ignore McCain's subsequent attacks, but I do think they'll demand something a little more creative. McCain knew those ads were substanceless. That's why they made the clumsy attempt to throw some incongruous charge about electricity taxes or whatever at the end. But nobody paid much attention to that. The counter of "why is John McCain talking about Britney Spears and Paris Hilton when we need to be addressing the problems of the American people" is potentially a very powerful one if it becomes a pattern. This makes it increasingly difficult for McCain to continue dodging the issues and throwing garbage instead. By throwing this stuff out already, McCain's limiting his own movement to some extent.

And, to go on a little bit of a tangent here, they're calling the oil drilling thing a flip-flop now, but that could really knock McCain's legs out from under him on the energy debate. McCain knows this and that's why he's still trying to cling to Obama's opposition to drilling rather than hitting him for a flip (though the media is taking up the slack there, I'll admit).

I'm not trying to be overly sanguine about this election. Or maybe it will turn out that I am. But, to use an unoriginal metaphor, I do think Obama's strength is the chess game. I don't know that I want him to start playing checkers and trading jumps just yet.

I agree the ground game is a very significant variable in this election that the media has no interest in talking about. That component of the Obama strategy is somewhat insulated from the silliness of cable news, etc. Again, I know that alone won't win him the election, but it's an important factor that should at least temper our frustration with the MSM games and polling fluctuations.

Obama cannot play nice with these guys. I applaud his efforts, but he will lose. He needs to hit back hard every time, and the MSM is not his friend, so he will have a much harder time doing so. Where are his counter ads?

As for the old folks, they will not change their minds. They have their social security and anyone that talks about national health care scares the sh*t out of them. (Even though they have national health care, but they don't see it that way.)

McCain has memory problems, he is not talking to the press as much as it has become obvious. Obama should use these constant gaffes, (and that is said kindly, they are much worse than a gaffe) to counter attack all the time. Obama has to toughen up and be an ass because the stupid average voter believes the crap the ads say and they do not do their homework.

Where is the ad where McCain cannot even remember the question, let alone answer it? Rove would have had that in an ad the next day. Link below for those of you who have not seen it.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/04/mccain-takes-long-pause-w_n_116699.html

I don't think this is a sign of old age. I might even buy into the Andrea Mitchell-Hardball crew argument - the man has no idea what his Rove acolyte staffed campaign is doing...nor does he care. Incurious, disinterested, joyfully happy in his ignorance - a lot like the guy current residing at 1600 PA Ave. That's not to say he diaapproves of what they're doing - as I'm sure the Andrea Mitchell's of the world believe - it's more like he told them, "whatever it takes, and don't worry about asking me for approval or keeping me up to speed with what you're doing because, god dammit, I'm the maverick POW and the press loves me!"

I have said it over and over, but scientific fact is that 86% of his age group shows some signs of dementia. I happen to work with this group, and have done so for 30 years, and actually do brain testing. He has problems. It is his age, I have no doubt. There is also his not caring, I agree. But over this whole campaign, I have watched and listened to the point I am convinced it is an issue that is being ignored, lord forbid we bring up the age card. I believe even Josh finally mentioned this the other day, and how there are too many mistakes to just write off to not caring or ignorance.

avatar

Oilbama is going to lose Florida by a lot more than 6%. His decision to disenfranchise voters in that state was sure to come back to haunt him and now that he has flipped flopped and wants to seat a full delagation he looks like a scumbag.
See the chair on Obama’s plane. It says President. Then there is the O on the tail of the plane that has replaced the flag of the United States. Then there was the faux Presidential seal. And on and on. I remain perplexed why someone would use such presumptuous symbolism, and does not have the common sense to realize that such symbols inevitably backfire. But of course Drug users (Cokeheads) have psych issues. These people leave their drugs, but whatever issue they have remains. Bush and Obama we know were drug users. We’ve seen the results of one addictive personality in the WH, and now the Democrats want equal time by giving the voters another addictive personality candidate. Maybe that’s why BO has not released his medical records.
BO must release his medical records immediatly so we can see how warped he really is. Hs addition to drugs reminds me of Bush. We do not need another 4 years of an druggie president.

avatar

Obama claims that the McCain campaign is using race because it is the sole tool the GOP candidate’s staff has to use against him.
Actually, it’s the reverse. Obama is exploiting the race card because it is all he has in his arsenal. He has no experience, no accomplishments, no special knowledge, no particular gifts aside from reading a teleprompter well. Especially compared to McCain and Clinton. So he has to fall back on trying to “guilt-trip” people into voting for him.
Nobama Never.

Pro-Obama Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com rates Survey USA as the most accurate multi-state pollster (just ahead of Rasmussen), so stop squawking about particular poll results you don't like.

Pro-Obama Zogby's shock poll today (a telephone poll, not the crappy online one) has McCain up 1 point after Obama was 10 points ahead a month ago. Obama lost 11 points in a month.

Obama's Berlin speech to a throng of 200,000 ironically may have been the beginning of the end of Obamamania in the US.

In search of a clue?
Celebrate the halftime score, and then watch your hopes for an Obama defeat go up in smoke.
and no more Clintons in the White House.

Obama has peaked. The guy is a weather vane.

McCain is ascendant. His base is galvanized and the swing voters will gravitate toward his resolve.

Clinton remains the best candidate for president.

Race
Trust
Experience

That is all that will matter in the privacy of the voting booth.

avatar

Wow.

Obama may have his problems, but a couple of stumbles and the hysterical Clinton people are coming out again in droves, flooding the web with their Obama hatred and, well, more hatred.

It is a disturbing spectacle, even more so than the Obama-first crowd's dissent damping in the previous news cycle.

I think both of you people have got to chill out. Obama has had a bad couple of weeks. He overdid the overseas trip and changed position on some important issues. It hurt his standing with independents and stagnated his base support. OK.

But Obama is a good politician and is reputed to have assembled a crack campaign team. They ARE going to fight back, and it is VERY early in the election cycle. The debates are ahead and Obama should cream McLame in them. Conventions are ahead, and we hope Obama's campaign will learn from their apparent hubris-based mistakes of recent past. There are many advert cycles ahead and hopefully Obama's campaign will learn how to effectively counter the "celeb-uppity" meme that has been put into circulation. And he absolutely has to start appearing "non-elitist", or he is risking to be a "Super-Kerry" during the GE and that may be fatal even in 2008 general GOP meltdown.

The hard truth is that if can't recover from this very mild slump, he will likely not a good president make. So let the man show what he is made of, come back in force and win.

avatar


I agreed with Amelie.

McCain's age is a factor. Considering the many, many different times McCain completely reversed positions after which he does another 180 degree turnaround.


If his strength is foreign policy it looks more like a weakness:

references Czechoslovakia


on CBS mentioned Pakistan-Iraq "border"


confuses Sunni and Shiite


declared Iraq was "first" major conflict since 911


called Putin the "President" of "Germany"


mixed up Somalia with Sudan


credited the surge for the Anbar Awakening


stated the troop level in Iraq was below pre-surge levels

so on and so on and so on.....

I understand the pressure a candidate is under, but some of the aforementioned are repeated time after time after time. That is not normal!

McCain criticizes Obama for giving a speech overseas, but apparently forgot the speeches he gave in Canada (@ $100 per person) and elsewhere back in May!


avatar

Obama can't attack McCain on his age. He can hint at it, using words like "cynical" but if he attacks McCain on age then a lot of people over 50 will be insulted. These polls do not include the youth, and they will turn out to vote this time. And anybody counting on the MSM to help the Democrats they must have been out of the country for the last two elections.
It's up to volunteers, donations, and the ground game. We knew this in February, we will have to work hard to override the corporate media.
It's not about Florida this time, it's about Ohio. GOP will probably pick up Florida, they have a Republican state government, including governor.
Remember that Obama called each state in the primary almost to the exact number months ahead of time. He knows what he has to do to win just as he did then.

Debra; I am over 50 and I would not be insulted by age factor, as I know for a fact age does matter. The problem would be more with the over 60's, and many of those, especially Medicare age, are voting McCain anyway, as they lived through the era when blacks were still treated as second class citizens, and that affected their perceptions, just as Islamists will affect our perceptions over the years. That is not to say they are all racists, but it definitely is a factor with this group. This is said in a general statement, not accusing individuals in a wide overall observation here.

Obama needs others to get it out there that McCain is having a hard time remembering things, putting coherent sentences together, mixing up factions of government in Iraq, forgetting countries names, reverting back to the 1980's and so forth. Plus, McCain offers no substantive alternative for health care, Obama has him hands down on this. This one issue, if no other, should be hammered over and over in LAY man's terms like the Republicans are doing with oil.

Finally, Wes Clark has been the only one to go after McCain and he was right. If the Democrats did this as a whole like the Republicans do with great success, it would work. The Democrats are spineless in this regard and totally unorganized at promoting the same hitting points repeatedly.

avatar

I posted this already... but I want to remind y'all we are only in first week of August.

Obama hit his low point in March and since has enjoyed a 5.5% lead until now. Similar to the 2000 and 2004 elections.


There are 92 or 93 days left until the election:


In 2000 Bush held a 6 point lead over Gore with 107 days to go. Gore moved up to take a 3 point lead with 56 days left. Bush reversed Gore's lead and led with 3 points during the last 3 weeks. Gore won the popular vote by 0.6 points.

In 2004 Kerry slowly built a 2 point lead by this time and held a small lead through-out the summer. With 50 days left Bush took back the lead by 4 points. Although Kerry gained 3 points he lost by a 2.4% margin.

So Obama is not in trouble. This is just the ebb and flow of polling. He'll get his mojo back.

Not to worry.....


Furthermore polls are not predictions; they are simply a snap shot in time.

Polls mean nothing until AFTER both republicans and democrats have held their conventions.

Obama is going to do fine. Not to worry.

avatar

People who say this election is Obama's to lose is underestimating the 26-year career of McCain. The question is, with that long of a career and national popularity why is McCain only tying with someone who has been on the national stage only a few years? People won't like McCain so much if he takes the lead, they like him as the underdog. Especially if he is running a negative and untruthful campaign, which he also did against Romney. He lied in Florida to beat Romney for the nomination. Soon the media will catch on that McCain is not the man they thought he was. He's just a crankier version of Bush, which makes him Cheney.

avatar

LOL


Good one Debra

avatar

So the latest hypothesis is that Senator McCain is far too honorable to really condone the recent edge to his campaign. Therefore, it is his handlers who are pushing this recent negative trend, and Senator McCain is oblivious and cannot possibly be expected to keep up with it all. He's just reacting to whatever they tell him Obama said, and what they feed him as working well for him (or not).

/sigh

So he's not a "grumpy old man", he's a "senile old man" and his kids are running over him?

I'm not sure either version presented is a reasonable choice for president, particularly following our current administration.

Too bad!
So sad!
All the little Obabots sticking their tiny members in the leaky dike trying to hold back the flood that is drowning Hussein.
The problem is that Americans are beginning to see Hussein Obama for the vacuous Say Anything but Ain't Done Nothin' fraud that he is.
The problem is that Americans will not turn the Oval Office into just another Affirmative Action job.

Every day Hussein reverses himself on another campaign plank.
Every day Hussein tries the same lies he deployed in the primaries.
And every day Hussein sinks in the polls.
Anybody see the pattern here?

But don't worry Obabots!
Hussein can probably be White House Lawn Jockey and his Shaniqua can always work the pole dance circuit. You know, that's where she really learned to "finally love America".


Every time I mention age