« Slightly Paranoid McCain Ad Theory Of The Day | Home | Seats For Obama's Convention Speech At Stadium Snapped Up In One Day »
Obama Camp: McCain's Latest Celeb Ad "Is A Lie"
Here's the response to McCain's latest "celeb" ad from Obama spokesperson Hari Sevugan:
"This ad is a lie, and it's part of the old, tired politics of a party in Washington that has run out of ideas and run out of steam. Even though a host of independent, nonpartisan organizations have said this attack isn't true, Senator McCain continues to lie about Senator Obama's plan to give 95% of all families a tax cut of $1,000, and not raise taxes for those making under $250,000 a single dime. The reason so many families are hurting today is because we've had eight years of failed Bush policies that Senator McCain wants to continue for another four, and that's what Barack Obama will change as President."
It's really good to see the word "lie" not once but twice, and the "run out of steam" dig is a good one. But it still seems like the "celeb" sneer needs to be confronted head-on. Something along these lines, perhaps?
Advertisement















Lies--yes, indeed. Good for them. (Echoing Obama's "they know they're lying about my energy plan")-- Now if we can just get some surrogates hitting hard against the lies and celebrity of McCain. Go Hillary, Kerry et al. while Barack has some much-needed R and R with family in Hawaii!!
August 8, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh has the line...not an answer to "celebrity" but a populist attack
August 8, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. That's the ticket.
May I suggest that McCain is out of touch with the problems of ordinary Americans? Possibly because he's too wealthy, possibly because he's spent too damn long in Washington?
It's not a new line, but there's a reason why it's a classic. Worked in '92.
August 8, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, make the populist move, like Obama's new "Hands" commercial for the Olympics, which is well done.
And if Obama can't strike back at McCain in certain ways, then, yes, that's what surrogates are for. Hope the VP choice (wouldn't it be fun if it turned out to be Gore!) is a "dog" that can bark and bite.
And we here on the Web can do our part in the image war.
"Who Does McCain Remind you of? A New Game for Hard Times"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/
August 8, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Here's what I don't understand:
Don't we want a President who is capable of shaping public opinion? Isn't that one of the major reasons why the Presidencies of Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan were much more successful than that of Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and the current occupant of the White House?
We've always elevated our President to celebrity status -- some more than others. Just think if Mitt Romney ran that ad. We'd be saying, "Why would we want a President who we couldn't elevate to celebrity status?"
I'm suprised the media hasn't asked this of John McCain?
August 8, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Here's what I don't understand:
Don't we want a President who is capable of shaping public opinion? Isn't that one of the major reasons why the Presidencies of Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan were much more successful than that of Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and the current occupant of the White House?
We've always elevated our President to celebrity status -- some more than others. Just think if Mitt Romney ran that ad. We'd be saying, "Why would we want a President who we couldn't elevate to celebrity status?"
I'm suprised the media hasn't asked this of John McCain?
August 8, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh. Sorry for the accident. Must have hit the reply button a few too many times.
August 8, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Here's what I don't understand:
Don't we want a President who is capable of shaping public opinion? Isn't that one of the major reasons why the Presidencies of Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan were much more successful than that of Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and the current occupant of the White House?
Americans have always tended to elevate their President -- some more than others -- to celebrity status. Suppose Mitt Romney ran this ad. We'd be asking, "Do we really want a President we couldn't elevate to celebrity status?"
I'm suprised the media hasn't asked about this.
August 8, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very rational reply.
But the people who like rational replies have already made up their minds, and most of 'em are already voting for us.
The people who are left are not paying a lot of attention, and they tend to go with their gut.
August 8, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that plain talk like calling a lie a lie will deflate the celebrity argument faster than confronting it directly. I would like to see an ad painting McCain as a rich elitist though.
August 8, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, having multiple mansions doesn't make you an elitist. But a $400 haircut does. Or living the American dream. What a weird world we live in.
August 8, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude...I bet it sets you back at least 4yards to maintain that Do!
August 8, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heh heh, it was a Halloween wig. My haircuts are pretty cheap, since I shave my head.
August 8, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
if Obama confronts the charge directly, the media will have days of "McCain and Obama fight over who's the bigger celebrity" coverage. it wouldn't be a fair and accurate portrayal of events, but that doesn't matter. Obama is best doing what he's doing; let McCain build the reputation for negativity and aversion to dealing with the real issues.
August 8, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with this. No matter how hypocritical McCain gets, the press will never call him on it. It's better to get your factual refutations in, in as few words as possible.
August 8, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think "It's a LIE!!"
Is a good hard hitting frame.
It's about friggin time!!
McCain is a LIER!!
Just like McBush!!
Liers!
LierS!
LIERS!!
August 8, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is McCain driving the news and making Obama have to "respond," instead of vice versa? Why can't Obama make an ad that forces McCain to respond? We've lost the last two presidential elections due to crap like this. I'm sick of Democratic candidates overestimating the intelligence of the American people.
August 8, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because the Obama team is basking in the glow of it's own brilliance just as team Kerry did 4 years ago. Obama's team is foolish to let McCain call the tune for even one day. They should be in total command of every aspect of this campaign especially setting the agenda. They should be on the offensive, putting McCain's back against the wall daily and consistently on every issue and every talking point. Instead, it's August... you know, the month Democrats typically cede to the Republicans allowing them to do whatever they like. A real pity too.
August 8, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's a lie, it's a lie, it's a lie"!!!!
When it should have been:
With 26 years of cozy life in Washington, John McCain is an unrivaled master of political game.
John McCain is the Annoited Heir of the Party of Bush.
Cue to hope and the rest of the blah blah.
August 8, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd frankly like to see Bill Clinton make an ad responding to this - something like:
"Now John McCain may tell you he didn't have financial relations with those oil companies ... and corporations sending American jobs overseas. But the truth is something different, and it's too bad he won't tell it."
August 8, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I always hate the rest of the "blah blah blah". The Dems always add "facts" at the end of the add, which dilutes the first half of whatever clever attack they've done. Just say "McCain's lying" and leave it there!
August 8, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let McCain give himself all the rope we need to hang him at the DNC 8/25
August 8, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
August 8, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree.
August 8, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am seeing the word "Lie" alot from Obama lately. I Honestly cannot guess what might happen if the Obama camp runs with the message that "McCain is a liar". Will it work or not? If it does, politics will be irrevocably changed.
August 8, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, bear in mind that there is a difference between calling someone a liar, and pointing out their lies.
August 8, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain is a Liar-- sounds like the perfect ad to me. Just catalog all his lies. Maybe connect his tendency to lie with Bush's tendency. Maybe show both people's lies in a split screen with a background image of them hugging.
Once his so-called "honor" crumbles, what is left of John McCain? His own party doesn't even like him. Moderates like him only because he's successfully sold himself as an honorable maverick. Attack that image, now -- it's all he's got.
McCain has already taken the low road, so there's no reason to avoid it. You can't win in politics without some serious tit for tat.
August 8, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. This is the lesson that we (painfully) learned from KKKarl - attack and destroy your opponents major strength.
Except McCain is doing a good job of this on his own.
August 8, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. "McCain is a liar," is a great message. Plenty of flip flop in his recent history, and one can cite the years of being against the GOP base, to soften up his core constituency, let'em stay at home come Nov.
He's a dishonest liar, says one thing, but gets elected and does another. How else could he run as a Republican, then be against the Republican party all those years?
August 8, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
McSame's message is a lie. McSame, himself, is just confused. Precious old dottard.
August 8, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
This most recent ad is easy to call out as a lie because it is so explicit. But, the Republicans have been running on the lie of "Tax and Spend" Liberal without being called on it for too long including the last celebrity ad. If you look at federal government spending as a percentage of GDP going back to 1976, the last two years of Jimmy Carter's and the last two years of Bill Clinton's administrations are the years of lowest spending. During the years of Reagan, Bush I and Bush II spending goes up. During the last 7+ years the spending graph is a spike, and with taxes down we end up with a National debt of 9.5 TRILLION DOLLARS. Although revenues were up during Clinton, the tax structure was much fairer. I would love to see Obama pull a Ross Perot during the debates and call the Republicans out on this lie with graphs. I even wonder if some smart creative ad person could create ads with graphs that speak to this truth and call Republicans what they are: Liars. People often understand pictures that show the facts more easily than words that require a sustained attention to ideas.
August 8, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
suzikimom and ogliberal, you ought to slap together some easy to read pie charts; colorful eye candy loaded with truth that can flash on a screen and tell the tale in a few seconds.
Seriously, wouldn't it be nice to have some quick reference point for this "Tax and spend, kill the economy Dems" B.S.? Paul Krugman has a blog with some charts but I'd love to see all of this corralled in one place.
August 8, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's interesting to watch - McCain keeps going back to the "Celebrity" attack, and the Obama camp seems to ignore it, so both must be getting different polling with McCain's saying it's working and Obama's saying it's not.
This wasn't his Olympic ad was it?
August 8, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point.
August 8, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
He needs to start questioning McCains Honor and dedication to Veterans. Mccain becomes very uncomfortable when questioned on this and recently refused to answer questions on Veterans bills. This is how you make Mccain lose it.
August 8, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
The audacity of hopelessness
August 8, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like seeing "Lie" too. I also like sarcasm, a lot.
But I honestly don't think that replying to McLame in the same vein that he makes his smears is productive.
August 8, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, but Obama's reply is weak and confirms my worst suspicion: his campaign is losing touch with how this is all playing out in the world outside their plane.
Like Kerry before him, Obama is allowing himself to be bitched.
Barack: No more money from me until you show me you can throw a punch. I'm not going to continue to subsidize a wimp.
August 8, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can see you point of view.
I think however, that sometimes it's better to hold off on a punch that may not land right or at all, in favor of a haymaker.
"Hello St. Louis! Aren't you glad the McCains are going to make millions of dollars selling Anheuser-Busch? They'll be able to afford another 8 houses!"
August 8, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shades of Al Franken: Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. Very refreshing.
I don't tink so. Celeb is McToast's meme. Repeating it, much less giving it serious attention, just fixes it more in the minds of the public and MSM. (Oops... did I just say that MSM have minds?)
More repetition of Big O's 26 Years theme would be more effective, IMO.
August 8, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a terrible response.
They need to do better.
Again, the bully is kicking sand in our
face and we say "stop it, don't, stop, you're
lying". I' bored with it. Kick some F'ing teeth
in for christ sake.
August 8, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Frankly, I think the snide/flippant/dismissive comments need to come from surrogates. Obama would do well to stay on message.
August 8, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't Obama planning on raising the capitial gains and dividend tax rates? More than 50% of americans own stock/mutuals. Many seniors rely on on dividend income for a living. Under Obama plan, their income taxes may not be increased, but their tax burden WILL go up.
August 8, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are exceptions based on overall income and, as I understand it, the ratio of investment income to wages. In particular to shield those retirement-, college- and other mutual fund savings accounts. So no.
Rich people leeching off others' work will see their investment taxes go up.
August 8, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama's only response to this is to call McGoo a liar, then I say go all the way with it and add the dreaded "pants on fire" to the end.
That'll get 'em!
Or maybe a better idea would be to stop being such a Kerry-esque pussy and drop the fucking hammer on those $500 shoes like he should have done a week ago.
August 8, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kerry did not use plain language like calling a lie a lie. He used euphemisms.
August 8, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes "lie" is a big word, this has to be the response every time McCain lies. Another good word is "dishonest", which is close to dishonor.
If Obama can get the idea that McCain lies out in the mainstream, all his later attacks will create as much or more skepticism than any harm done to Obama.
Once people stop believing what you say, you are pretty much screwed.
August 8, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been supporting for years the idea that if its a lie, call it a lie, and if someone lies, call them a liar. I believe that's the only way you can stop them as they will have to defend the lie and they won't be able to do it.
August 8, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Still looking for that gun brought to the knife fight. Still looking for awareness that politics is a contact sport.
August 8, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
The appearance of that gun Obama claimed he was carrying is fucking long overdue.
You do have a gun, right, Barack?
August 8, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goddamn it - what makes you think that your perception of politics as a "contact sport" is correct?
The Repugs turned it into a contact sport. I really think Obama is trying to take the thing out of the deathmatch model the Repugs put it in and form a government that cooperates to get shit done.
Furthermore, if that isn't his style - and it's not apparently, then it isn't.
He likes to talk to people like we are grown-ups.
August 8, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, there's a lot of truth to what you say, but it can be taken too far. A huge percentage of the voting population seem to be susceptible to negative propaganda, unfortunately. Perhaps we all are.
John Kerry obviously took the whole "grown-up" thing too far in his weak response to the swift-boaters. There has to be a middle ground, where you can fight back hard without lowering yourself. Bill Clinton was often masterly at finding the right balance. I'm not sure Obama has found it yet.
August 8, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bullshit. Where I come from (NYC) and where Obama lives (Chicago), politics is a rumble. Both of those towns are Democratic. Furthermore, Bubba Clinton was fond of saying the same thing. If Obama is such a gentleman and won't engage on that level, then he should unleash Biden or someone else with the balls for a fight.
Otherwise, he's going to get his ass kicked.
August 8, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The secret to playing this contact sport at its highet level is to beat the crap out of you oponent whil looking like you are not fighting back. OPbama has mastered that skill. He whuped the clinton machine while a courus of naysayers were screaming that he was not being tough enough. He fights back while avoiding the apearance of being beligerent.
August 8, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
From where I'm sitting, he ran out the clock on Clinton who torpedoed herself with her choice of campaign management. If there were any big states left at the end, it might have been far closer than it ended up and could have conceivably gone the other way.
Politics is all about appearances and impressions. No one votes for a wimp. Calling someone a liar after he's given you a wedgie is not an effective marketing strategy.
August 8, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. No one gave anyone a wedgie. They told a lie.
2. He familiarized himself with the rules of the nomination contest and executed a strategy that won. He exceded his own predictions for how well he would do in most states. If the contest had been diferent then he would have adjusted his strategy acordingly.
3. He is playing to win on Nov 4. Our aproval of his tactics and strategy is irrelevent to his victory. We have no way of knowing how he would have done in the primary if he had attacked Clinton more visciously as was recomended here, but we know that he won while ignoring the council of the beligerati.
August 8, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. The wedgie is the "celebrity" schtick.
2. He won AND Clinton lost. He owed a lot to her campaign's hubris/incompetence/stupidity.
3. Primaries and general elections are two different animals. Obama couldn't afford to cheese off a huge number of Democrats with negative counter attacks and still claim to be "the new politics". Believe it or not, Clinton was constraigned by party elders in her kitchen sink strategy. The Republicans are not so constraigned and are launching their ad hominem campaign now, undoubtedly saving the best for last. If Obama hopes to maintain control of his own brand, he better get hopping. He doesn't need my approval of his tactics, but if he hopes to get more of my support, he'll have to put out a better game.
August 8, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is winning and will continue to do so. He has shown that he is flexible and capable of changing strategy when needed. He is the best practioner of political theater and timing I have ever seen. I trust the advisors who have goten him here to take him the rest of the way. I see the same arguments against his methods I saw in the primaries and they are just as worthless now as they were then.
August 8, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm calling the Obama campaign TODAY, and i am going to tell them, TOUGHEN UP ' or I'm withholding my donations.
To reach the Campaign Headquarters by phone, please call: (866) 675-2008
August 8, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno. The Obama responses are starting to sound repetitious. That'd be a good thing if what they were saying were compelling enough.
But they aren't.
August 8, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree Tom, I'd also like to see Obama go after McBush on his trademark "Country first"...ie "Is John McCain putting country first or lobbyists first"...Is john McCain putting country first or Big Oil first...etc..etc..
August 8, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amazing, isn't it... how many dozens of ways Obama could go after that rotten old shit?
Instead, Obama is content to clutch his arms around his face and take the blows, occasionally screaming "lie!" when the old man lands a shot.
It's a knife fight, alright, and Obama's balls appear to have been the first casualties.
August 8, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's playing defense. Looks like McCain's plan is to keep him on defense. Looks Obama's plan is to stay on defense. I guess he wants to find out if the old adage re defending=losing is another cliche that doesn't apply to him.
But I have to say again: to me "new" politics would be one in which the Dem DOES go on the attack once in a while. "Always defending" looks a hell of a lot like a rerun of how we've been playing the game for at least 8 years.
August 8, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
For years I have been listening to pundits say (and in this case I think they are right) that a politician is better off if he can make his negative attacks aper to be responses to his oponents negative atacks. That way you make you oponent look like the one who is debasing himself. We finaly get a democrat who can do it and all people can say is, 'Why is he not attacking first?' Because he is smarter than that that is why.
August 8, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama just better make sure none of his future ads or claims even stretch the truth if he's going to start throwing around such a charge.
August 8, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I voted for Obama in my state's primary, but sometimes I wonder if Hillary would have been a better candidate. She, at least, would be running ads that drove the story and got people talking, as happened with her "3 a.m." ad. Has Obama taken the initiative or defined the debate in any of his advertising? What's the point of having all that money if he's not going to use it?
Presidential politics is all about defining your opponent, and dammit, I'm sick of this. Fight the hell back already.
August 8, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
It might all just be part of a strategy to hold back on the negativity until after the convention.
Remember, Obama hit Clinton very hard with the "will say anything to be president" meme right before Iowa. It worked, he caught her in the national polls, and the rest is history. So maybe he deserves the benefit of the doubt until September.
I'll start getting real antsy then, however, if he's not hitting McCain with anything harder than sarcasm.
August 8, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah Hillary drove the media narrative all the way to her humiliating defeat.
Obama is running for president, not the PR Olympics. He's got to win states, not media narratives.
August 8, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, that is what I was trying to say.
August 8, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lie.
I'm so happy that Obama is willing to call dishonest attacks what they are. (Even though the 'lie' part refers to probably the least important aspect of the ad -- the tax policy stuff)
We've always complained that no one was willing to call the Bush administration out on their lies, but at least Obama is willing to do it against his would be successor.
August 8, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the Obama strategy is to go negative after the democratic convention: He better go hard, harsh and it better work.
August 8, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do not care if he ever goes negative. I care if he wins.
August 8, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said in Philadelphia last night. “Because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”
August 8, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
@Indie Pro
must be an alternate universe since in my world they have brought the knife, the gun, the bazooka, the howiter and the Kalashnikov, while Obama is diddling himself. But then maybe that's his weapon of choice.
August 8, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that why all the sites that track electoral votes show him winning handily?
August 8, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The usual press statement that may, if lucky, garner all of .10 second notice in the national media. Meanwhile, the MSM will play this ad over and over and over as part of the news. There will be virtually no mention of McCain's wealth or lack of voting (even being in DC) to vote or taken action on issues relevant to the middle and working class.
I am sorry. Obama said that he was going to use Chicago rules. They bring a knife, we bring a gun. So far, all I see is a big sissy who gets slugged in the face and responds with "naughty, naughty."
August 8, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The "lie" theme is great but it needs to be broadened to attack all the lies that have been told to the American people over the past 8 years. I think all but the dumbest Americans know they've been lied to and that's why I think he needs a VP who can spit it out, not one who does nuance. Throw that straight talk express right back at 'em.
August 8, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's why Bayh, Kaine, or Sebelius seem like questionable VP choices to me.
Clinton or Webb would have been much better attack dogs. Biden probably wouldn't be half-bad, either.
In my mind, Hillary Clinton has redeemed herself since the primaries and deserves very serious consideration for VP again. Honestly, she's the most capable Dem out there besides her husband. So what if Obama and her don't see eye to eye on style? -- that's a good thing. They agree on 95% of the substantive stuff.
August 8, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, but more than anything else, Obama needs to demonstrate that he, himself can defend himself and fight back against the lies and smears. He doesn't have to do it daily, but he needs to actually and literally show the nation now and then that he won't be bitch-slapped and pushed around like past Democratic nominees have been.
August 8, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually "lie" is not a good word... it's too common and too extreme at the same time.
Obama should use more colloquial language.
"make stuff up"
"telling stories"
"pulling stuff out of his ass" (OK maybe not that one)
"trying to fool you"
"Lies" sounds rather stuffy and defensive. See my ad for Obama below.
August 8, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Those euphemisms worked so well for Kerry.
August 8, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
And "Tell him to stop lying about my record," worked even worse for Dole
August 8, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you hear Sen Obama say something that inartfull let me know.
August 8, 2008 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Got hope?
I've got Hope.
Which is to say, I'm hoping against all apparent evidence that my candidate will remember where he left his balls.
August 8, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, using the word "lie" is good. The rest of the response was the same Washington DC Democratic blather. It's too long. Nuance doesn't work in the ring. You have to slug em hard. But this is progress using the word lie. At least the media now have a hook to go with instead of the rest of the mealy-mouthed stuff.
August 8, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every time Nixon said "I am not a crook" it drove the crooked image in deeper. Besides, Obama can't say he's not a celebrity because he is.
Barack supports Chicago's handgun ban so maybe he is not armed and can't take a gun to the GOP knifefight.
I suspect ancient John will have a good week upcoming while Barack is on vacation. Barack better not be caught windsurfing.
August 8, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dr. Zaius,
Get lost, u PUMA troll!!!
August 8, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why won't Barack Obama rip into McCain? What is he afraid of? McCain is a chicken-hawk, wealthy elitist, who denigrates women.
There is so much to attack McLame with, what are u waiting for Barack?
August 8, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like some journalists are actually doing their work.
From MSNBC's First Read:
McCain claims in an ad released today that "Obama voted to raise taxes on people making just $42,000. He promises more taxes on small business, seniors, your life savings, your family."
But when it comes to promises, it's worth pointing out that, according to the non-partisan Tax Policy Center's analysis of both candidates' proposed plans, Obama would cut taxes for those making in the range of $38,000 to $66,000 three to almost eight times more than McCain would.
Under Obama's plan, according to the center, by 2009, those making $37,595 would see an average increase in their income of 3.6%, or a tax cut of $892; those making an average of $66,354 would see an increase in their income of 2.4%, or a tax cut of $1,042.
On the other hand, Under McCain's plan, those making $37,595 would see an increase in their income of only about 0.5%, or $113 tax cut; those making $66,354 would see only an increase of 0.7% in their income, or a tax break of $319.
I'm checking other sites. Stay tuned.
PD: Unrelated topic. The Chinese killed it at the olympic ceremony. Unbelievable. Watch it.
August 8, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
MSNBC is doing its job, but CNN & FOX Noise will just along with lies for ratings.
August 8, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNN is busy with the Russia-Georgia war.
I rooting for a McCain gaffe on this, confusing that Georgia with the other Georgia: "We can't allow that russian tanks enter in Atlanta... What?, Really?, Sorry, it's other Georgia..."
Only hoping.
Warning: Not real quote. Humor attempt.
August 8, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course CNN is covering the Georgia thing closely, it's right in their back yard.
Lieberman whispers in my ear
Oh, sorry about that
August 8, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I absolutely agree about the Opening Ceremonies. Breathtaking at some spots. I pity Canada following that act in two years time, even if it is just the Winter Games.
August 8, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
From Politico's Ben Smith:
The new McCain spot seeks to paint Obama as out-of-touch, focusing on taxes.
Notably, the ad backs off a much-criticized claim that the Obama's vote (on a budget resolution) hit people making $32,000. The ad now says it hits people making $42,000. (FactCheck.org gets results!)
Obama's current plan calls for raising taxes only on much higher income people.
August 8, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
From The Caucus, New York Times:
FactCheck.org has already debunked this claim that Mr. Obama’s vote on a budget resolution would have raised taxes on a family making a rather low income. But the McCain campaign keeps repeating this.
FactCheck says in an update: “We reiterate: McCain’s $32,000 figure is phony.” Or on $42,000. “The resolution does not contain a specific provision to raise tax rates, but rather assumes that most of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire as scheduled in 2011,” it said.
Also, a pro-Obama WSJ editorial at HuffPost.
And a radio attack ad in Ohio, here at TPM.
August 8, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
MSNBC is doing its job, but CNN & FOX Noise will just along with the lies for ratings.
August 8, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
MSNBC is doing its job, but CNN & FOX Noise will just along with the lies for ratings.
August 8, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. Waiting for a strong campaign from Obama is like Waiting for Godot. It never comes. Whatever the faults of Charles Schumer (and there are many...mostly his shitty politics), at least he knows how to fight. Maybe the Obama camp knows what it is doing, but from here they seem to be more of the same old cautious tired Democratic politics.
August 8, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
That being the case, then he should make use of the singlemost memorable quote from that play, L'enfer, c'est les autres! and inflict the hell of the Others (his surrogates) on McCain!
Perhaps they only think they do.
August 8, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
They beat the campaign that used the tactics you recomend. Who is the biggest loser, the loser or the one who lost to the loser?
August 8, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not interested in losers. I'm interested in kicking Republican ass so hard that it'll take them 20 years to regroup.
August 8, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Me to. The only way to do that is to look like you are doing them a favor while you do it. If you look like you are savaging them you only beat them for a cycle and have to do it again next year.
August 8, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama took out a campaign that had a ton of natural advantages (near-universal name recognition, wide support, etc) and essentially had the campaign over in late February.
Call me crazy, but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt this time.
August 8, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude, you repeat the same message twice.
Just checking. Nothing wrong with that.
August 8, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wouldn't it be grand if Americans had
Affordable health care...
A job that could pay the bills...
Broad global support to keep us secure...
A tax system that offered more benefits to the middle class over the rich
An energy policy that doesn't cow to petro-dictatorships
etc etc
But that life isn't what John McCain has in mind for you...
August 8, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
With apologies to my own inexplicably undertrafficked reader post, the DNC should do an ad saying something like (with appropriate grainy images):
"Which of the McCains' 8 houses does he sit in when he devises ways to portray Obama as living the 'grand' life?"
"... or do the thoughts come to him as he rides in his family plane, or when he sits with the Washington lobbyists who run his campaign?"
" . . . and why the childish ads about Brittany Spears and the whining about Barack Obama's popularity -- which McCain calls 'celebrity' -- from a politician who appeared in The Wedding Crashers and been on the Daily Show more than any other guest?"
"John McCain . . . 'maverick,'? or 'hypocrite'?"
August 8, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sense some trolls(both old as well as new ones) at work here and quite frankly Obama knows exactly what he is doing here and his responses are part of a larger picture. To answer your calls for tough, mean and more macho responses than what McFuddles charges in his ads are foolish! This election isn't 2000 or 2004...This shit will not work over the long haul and Obama counts on us to be smarter than McFuddles fans and voters and do the right thing. He will respond and the key will be timing and message! Why should be try to out duel McFuddle on these ridiculous ads and show any concern that they are working!
August 8, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any strategy predicated on the intelligence of voters is so doomed.
Elections are decided by "undecided voters" who decide in the last days of the campaign.
How stupid do you have to be to not know who you are going to vote for on the first day of November?
August 8, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/08/obama_camp_mccains_latest_cele.php#comment-3009593
August 8, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's 3AM attack came because she was behind and desperate. These current McCain ads are negative and attacking because he's behind and desperate.
This is child's play for what is actually in store for Obama as we creep closer to the election. It's going to get really ugly.
Obama better hope that the majority of voting America is tired of partisan politics. Believe it or not there are Republicans who can't stand Hannity or Limbaugh and McCain's campaign seems to be running that style of campaign. The uglier McCain is forced to go, the more people he'll turn off, also there is probably the law of diminishing returns on gutter attack ads as well. If McCain is going to be negatively attacking for the next three months it could be grating.
McCain can't rally the base himself - he's trying to egg Obama into doing it for him, by attacking the poor old war hero.
August 8, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh f**k another LAME Obama response to an excellent attack ad. We are so screwed.
Look at this drivel:
Here's what he should have said... Barack, feel free to edit for a 1 minute or 30 second add.
Barack, you are welcome.
August 8, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
But on second thought delete the first sentence... doesn't help. So we have:
August 8, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
nice work.
August 8, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The principle of "not what I think, but what I think everyone else thinks" applies here. According to the principle, what most frequently governs social/political outcomes is not "what I think," but "what I think other people think." When polled, most people object to violence, not sex on TV. When asked "Which do you think most other people object to?" they answer "Sex, not violence." And sex, not violence, is what gets restricted. We're a social species and we tend to fall in line with what everyone else does or thinks, even if that perception is not in fact correct.
TV is very powerful in conveying the impression of "what other people think." Ads mocking Obama that run over and over again create an impression to each individual viewer that, whatever he or she may think, a lot of other people think Obama is a feckless, airheaded pretty boy, or whatever, especially if there's no countervailing blizzard of images pushing the other way. They may not individually think that themselves--even a majority of them may not. But that doesn't matter if the impression that "this is what everyone else is thinking."
August 8, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
"But that doesn't matter if the impression that 'this is what everyone else is thinking' is fixed in the public mind."
August 8, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The undecided voter is a myth. They have decided. They just want to give the impresion of thoughtfullness so they claim to stil be weighing the options.
August 8, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
This should have been in reply to mike2 at 1:29
August 8, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Got any evidence of that?
August 8, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I cannot rember where I saw the article that I got the idea out of, so no I got nothing. Sorry, I should have book marked it. It was realy interesting. It was a political guy extrapolating the results of a study of juror behavior.
August 8, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
August 8, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Chuck Schumer is giving you pointers on how to be tough, it's time to turn in your Man Card.
August 8, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
From Washington Post:
But some veteran Republican campaign strategists disagree with McCain's strategy.
"I would basically go silent for the next two weeks. I think the American people have reached a saturation point with both Senator Obama and Senator McCain," says Doug MacKinnon, a veteran of several Republican campaigns.
"Low-key is the key," says Bush 2000 national campaign manager Joe Allbaugh about campaigning during the Olympics.
"You spend some time fundraising. You do not take anything away from the Olympic spirit or more importantly the American athletes," he says. "Raise some money and do not make any mistakes."
Allbaugh says that in 2000, there was no organized effort to lay low during the two weeks of competition, but "We were very sensitive" to the nation's focus on the games. "The Olympics are a huge event."
"You're going to get drowned out," MacKinnon advises. "The American people want to root for American athletes. They don't want to be distracted at the moment. They're not going to forget that McCain and Obama are out there. The campaigns have to put the ego in check a bit."
August 8, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also, "this ad is a lie" is COMPLETELY lame.
People DO NOT think of "ads" as lies. Ads can be deceptive, distorting, all mixed up... but people think that statements are lies... a whole string of lies is not a "lie".
If you talk like a normal person (will Obama get this right) you say "this ad is full of lies".
But as noted above, the word "lie" sounds petulant and childish. "He's lying about me Mommy!" Well tough shit honey, go out and deal with it yourself.
"Oh poor baby, someone is lying about you... what are you gonna do about it?"
No, you have to mock him, not challenge him.
You say:
"Like a little school boy, like a spoiled son of an Admiral, McCain would rather make up stories than tell us where he stands."
You say:
"McCain is a good novelist, writes some good stories, but let's not confuse fiction with fact."
Not "Mommy, he's lying!!!"
Can these guys run a campaign or not?
August 8, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better than the openents he has faced so far. You are telling the champ that he does not know how to play.
August 8, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn straight I am. He's been playing before a friendly crowd or had some lucky breaks. Now he's in the big leagues, fighting the slime masters, the best ones on planet Earth.
And he's blowing it again and again... say I.
It's depressing.
August 8, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
A friendly crowd?
Do you even remember what the dynamics of the Democratic primary were in 2006 and early 2007?
Come the hell on. Hillary had basically been anointed and Obama beat her despite very little name recognition at the start thanks to running a brilliant campaign.
Just because he's not running it the way you want it doesn't (necessarily, of course) mean that his way is wrong.
August 8, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where I come Democrats are a friendlier crowd than Republicans.
That was a fist fight... this is a knife fight.
August 8, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
from
Where I come from...
August 8, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I continue to believe that his team is the best I have seen and are selling the best politicain in more than a generation. I will bet on them and hope that they take neither my council nor yours as they are better than both of us put together.
August 8, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
when I start my campaign for office, consider this your offer for employment!
August 8, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I accept! :-)
August 8, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
no, lie is accurate. It is also a powerfull and succinct word that DIRECTLY cuts to the core of republican politics. Two things are for sure
1) The media soon will have no choice but to run with the headline "Obama attacks McCain as a liar". This is good an puts McCain on the defensive in a way we have not seen.
2) The repubs will not know how to respond. I would put money on it.
August 8, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Obama attacks McCain as a liar" sounds pretty damn petulant to me.
McCain isn't attacking on the level of fact.
Mostly he's pushing emotional buttons.
Obama needs to push buttons too.
"Lie" is just about some boring old claims about what is strictly true or false. That is truly of minimal significance in the current environment. Wishing it were doesn't make it so.
In fact this campaign WILL NOT be won on the basis of what is true or false about any given politicians record or proposal. To even think that suggests a complete disconnect with how campaigns are fought and won.
August 8, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
even if obama apologises for his elitist ways, i will still vote for mccain because he understands real americans. if obama had real control of his wife he wouldn't be so afraid of a wet tshirt contest. and his rudeness to hillary was intolerable. who does he think he is?
August 8, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
sanity in an insane asylum is crazy making
August 8, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Question. what is a 'real' american anyway? Are there fake ones running about that we need to know about?
August 8, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
OhioDems ad against McCain:
http://edgeofthewest.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/straight-talk-my-friends/
August 8, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is an excellent diary about McCain posted on Kos today. It details some of the information in Amy Silverman's book. Silverman is an Arizona reporter who has been covering this two-faced guy for a long time. It should provide plenty of material for the Obama campaign to do first strike business rather than playing reactionary defense all the time.
The article has a great line about McCain being the Eddie Haskell of politics.
http://black-max.dailykos.com/
August 8, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
50% of Americans own individual stocks and mutual funds? Ummmm, depends on how you look at it...and when you're talking about cap gains and dividend taxes, how you look at it makes a big difference. See here. This data from the census bureau is the most current (2005) I can find...and given the economic situation in this country over the last 2 years, I doubt ownership increased. The numbers show that 50% of American households own some sort of equity. But it also shows that only about 35% own equity outside of an employer sponsored plan. What these numbers don't tell us about this 35% is how many own equity in tax-deferred vehicles like IRAs, variable annuities, etc. As you know, those tax-deferred investments would NOT be affected by any increase in the capital gains or dividend tax. Distributions from those vehicles are taxed as regular income, although there is a penalty if you withdraw early.
Even if we assume that all of the equity owned outside of these tax-deferred vehicles, that doesn't tell us how much they own. Just like income, the largest percetage of that ownership in total dollars is probably held by only 5% (or less) of that 35%. I own a small number of individual equities outside of tax-deferred vehicles. The dividends I receive on these shares on an annual basis equal about the price of a dinner for two.
Per this report, 45% of Americans own equities only in tax-deferred accounts. 42% own them in both tax-deferred and taxable accounts. 13% own equities only in taxable accounts. I just told you my story. I fall into that 42% of Americans owning equities in both types of accounts. But most of these equities are held in tax-deferred accounts. My guess is that is probably true of many of my fellow 42-percenters.
The large majority of the people who would be impacted significantly by any increase in the capital gains and dividend tax are people who own a lot of individual stocks and bonds outside of tax-deferred vehicles - ie, wealthy people.
As for seniors, again, much of their income in retirement is coming from social security or distributions from tax-deferred retirement income plans/accounts. And for seniors, Obama is proposing that those with under $50,000 in annual income pay no income taxes.
August 8, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
This, btw, was meant to be a response to BKinDaHouse's post above.
August 8, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great posting.
August 8, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, what the fuck?
The Obama campaign is clearly getting use out of that Weak-Ass Fill-in-the-Blank Standard Politico Bullshit Response That People Stop Reading and or Listening to After the First Sentence Machine(tm).
August 8, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The theme that Barack needs to hit McCain with is the classic political insider. He's been in congress for over 26 years. He's Washington to the core. I know he's famous for going against his party but just keep repeating the following:
1. 26 years in congress
2. Never held a private sector job
3. Washington insider
4. Out of touch with America
Get every Dem talking head to say one or more of these phrases every time someone sticks a microphone in their face like the GOP does so well with their talking points. Do that and tie his policies to Bush and Barack can't loose.
August 8, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lot's of armchair quarterbacks out today...
Obama won the Democratic primary with disciplined execution of a well planned and especially a well timed strategy.
When his back was against the wall, and his candidacy was truly threatened (Rev. Wright), he did what he had to do to keep it alive.
I have no doubt that the campaign knows what they are doing now. If they thought they were truly threatened by these attacks and were on the verge of being "swift-boated" like Kerry, we would be seeing very forceful responses by Obama.
But I think they know that the election is not going to be decided in August. It will be decided in October. We have the convention coming, which will be a huge event, and of course, the debates.
To use a boxing analogy, it is still early rounds and McCain is throwing punches fast and furiously. Let him tire, let him drop his guard, and then go for the kill.
Timing is everything.
August 8, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is, mason, that this is not the quality of response I saw in the primaries, and it follows a trend. This is weak.
August 8, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just to be clear, I do not advocate going strongly negative. I advocate being, if you pardon the pun, better, smarter, faster.
August 8, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's team needs to run with a slogan something like: "McCain is lying to you and running a DISHONORABLE campaign." That's it, frame him as a lier and a dishonorable one at that. Go after his strength ala Rove.
August 8, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read the battle between those who want a stronger response and that those who believe the current strategy is working. Both have valid points and even if I support the current strategy, I won't deny that sometimes a part of me wants to hit hard.
Right now, the ones are paying most attention are people like us, who are already in the tank for any of the two candidates. There is people who is slowly starting to look the election's coverage and there's people that only will start thinking in the election with the conventions.
There are undecided voters, but there is not one only type on undecided voters: There's the "cattle" undecided voters, who believe any crap of every commercial (and any e-mail) and deserved to be called the way Brian Griffin (from Family Guy) called them "the biggest idiots on the planet".
There is another type of undecided voter, who rather looks to the proposals, weights the options and take a firm choice at the end.
How many of the types of undecided voters exists today, I don't know. I hope there's more of the latter, but if you wanna know for sure, you better call a psychic.
The times where people just took from granted the word of politicians and campaigns is over now. The technology like the web allow people like you and me find out more abut the choices available.
Going to fact checking sites, see videos on YouTube or talk here in this comment section.
This is not a sprint race, this is a marathon.
If you go fast too early, you get tired and maybe you won't finish the race after all.
That's what will happen to the McCain campaign.
It's true that the Obama campaign should push harder, but it must be careful in doing so. One single mistake because of attacking without thinking and I promise you, the defeat will be worse that the ones of Mondale or Dukakis. You can mark my words on that. The Ohio radio ad is a good attack and I expect more on that radio ads on these days. The olympic TV ads must be positive, even republicans are concern of the opposite effect (see a previous post above from me).
At the end, I could be wrong, most voters are freaking idiots and they will support four more years of the current crap we have today. Don't forget you that three quarters of the country believe it's in the wrong track, most people believe there's a recession and most believe Iraq was a mistake. If they go to the GOP, even if they know this facts, so they deserve the shit that comes with that choice: Actions have consequences.
But in the end, I take the word of screenwriter William Goldman: "Nobody Knows Anything". We have two options: do nothing, sit down and watch or we can be part of the fight to take the U.S. on a right path again.
“Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.”
Sun Tzu
August 8, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
One thing Obama can't be is too serious. Adds like the one Paris Hilton would do more for Obama than any confrontational ads like the republicans are doing. Where's the humor Obama? You got the cash. That stupid old man McCain is on all the talk shows being a creepy funny old man. Hit America in its funny bone. Democrats are funnier, sexier, smarter and doggoneit...
August 8, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
My take on how Obama should respond to the Celebrity line of attacks goes something like this (key points bolded):
"People are not excited by me, Obama, the person. They're excited because they have hope.
"They see someone like me, who came from humble roots, and knows what it's like to work hard and earn their way. And now that kid with a funny name has a shot at being president. That's the American dream folks... that with persistence and effort anyone can grow up to be president, or a Doctor, an Olympic athlete. Hope for the American Dream is worth getting excited about. [pause for applause]
Apparently, John McCain doesn't get it.
"They see a guy up here on the stage, who may have a funny name, but knows what it's like to try and raise a family while struggling to make ends meet. They see a guy who is on their side - not another politician who talks the talk, but makes a bunch of shady deals with powerful lobbyists and foreign sheiks when nobody is looking. In me, they see a candidate who proposes policies that can have a real positive impact on their lives, instead of policies that continue the failures of the past 8 years and pour more of your hard-earned cash into the pockets of the oil industry and other corporate fat cats. They see in me a candidate who, for the first time in a long time, will represent the interests of regular people like them - families, students, single parents, laborers, seniors. Hope for one's future... that's worth getting excited about! [pause for applause]
I guess John McCain isn't thinking about your future.
"They see in me a candidate, who, as president, will bring about an end to an endless war in Iraq. They see a candidate who's ready to lead, not because he once served in the military, but because he demonstrated the judgement to recognize the folly of the Iraq war and the courage to speak out against it when it wasn't popular to do so. They see a candidate who can restore America's image and prestige and rebuild strategic alliances that have been strained by neo-conservative foreign policies (the same policies, by the way, which my opponent still supports even after they've been proven to be failed policies.) Hope for our country - THAT'S worth getting excited about!!!
"Instead, my opponent would prefer that you have no hope. He wants you to take the cynical bait. He'll have you believe I'm some kind of elitist [pause for a good laugh] and therefore out of touch with the every-day people of this country, all while he's flying on his private jet and planning his next moves with some of the most powerful lobbyists in Washington. He'll have you think I'm not experienced enough in foreign policy, while he's still trying to sort out the difference between Shia and Sunni tribes in Iraq. He'd have you believe I'll raise your taxes - which for all but the richest of Americans is not true - all while he's supporting the same Bush policies that have been sending your jobs overseas and allowing fuel prices to go through the roof.
But, that's OK. John McCain can attack me all he wants. Because it isn't about me. And, it isn't about John McCain. It's about YOU. It's about bringing the troops home. It's about making the right environmental choices that will affect not only us, not only our children, but all generations to come. It's about things like job security and national security. And so, any time you see John McCain's campaign slinging mud instead of addressing your needs - that's 'politics as usual' and your first clue that McCain isn't on your side of the issues. He wants to change the subject, because straight talk isn't his friend any more. John McCain 'can't handle the truth', and the truth is, there are only two choices facing the American public this November: more of the same, or change. Only two choices: reward and reinforce the malfeasance and incompetence of the current administration, or bring in fresh blood and new ideas. Only two choices: choose to continue the disastrous policies of the Bush administration for another four years, or, chart a new course which offers renewed hope for America.
"I am simply here to make the case for change. People like to talk about my speaking skills, but my voice is nothing without yours. I am merely the loud-speaker for your hopes and dreams for our nation. If John McCain wants to belittle your enthusiasm by comparing crowds of concerned and committed citizens such as yourselves, to a flock of signature-seeking groupies, then shame on him. He knows better. This isn't about red-carpets and paparazzi, this is about our nation's future - about your future. But, no matter how low John McCain and his handlers want to take this campaign, I will not go there. I will continue to champion the issues that matter to you, and to address the difficult challenges our nation faces. That's both change you can believe in, and the straight-talk you deserve."
August 8, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
August 9, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Finally! Now if they would just start calling Bush and Cheney liars maybe we could get somewhere.
I’m trying to turn the tables on the McCain folks and their stupid tire gauge stunt. I’m having gauges made and selling them on eBay in hopes of raising $2300 for Obama (the max contribution). If you are down, can you please forward this on to other like minded folks. Thanks!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110277515563
August 9, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink