« It's Unlikely Webb Will Speak At The Dem Convention | Home | McCain On Swift-Boating Book: "Gotta Keep Your Sense Of Humor" »

Obama Camp: McCain's Latest "Celeb" Ad Is "False And Discredited"

Here's the response from Obama spokesperson Hari Sevugan to McCain's ad from this morning calling Obama a "celebrity" and the "taxman":

"This ad is just more of the same old false and discredited attacks that Senator McCain knows aren't true. Senator McCain will say or do anything to hide the truth: while Obama will cut taxes for the middle class, McCain will give a billion dollars in new tax breaks to America's eight largest corporations, while his plan provides no direct relief for more than 100 million American Families.

"And despite his rhetoric, he's refusing to support the bipartisan Senate proposal to expand production and invest in renewable energy because he wants to protect tax breaks for oil companies. We've seen what happens when we put the oil companies and their lobbyists ahead of working families, and that's exactly what Americans want to change in this election."

Tough stuff. But what happened to the word "lie"? That had been popping up a lot in Obama campaign responses, much to this blog's delight. Bring back "lie"!

Also, it still seems like the "celeb" sneer needs to be engaged directly. Something along these lines, perhaps.


Late Update: Lots of folks think the Obama team doesn't wanna hit McCain on his wealth because they don't wanna get hit with the old "class warfare" club. One other possibility: Drop the words "Washington celebrity" (from Obama's previous response ad) into these responses. Of course, that risks looking like tit for tat.


28 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

There's a lot of work to do on their message strategy, but to give Obama's team credit, at least this response pivoted to an attack on McCain (although not nearly a tough enough one).

Also, every single press release, response, statement, etc, should have the phrase "McCain is offering nothing more than a 3rd Bush term."

Using the word "lie" is great. But more importantly is saying Bush = McCain. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat again....

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

ditto

user-pic

McCain lies, his good friend Bush lies".

Case closed.

Yep, the construction (used in different pieces here) should be "this is a lie, and John McCain knows it" or "John McCain knows this is a lie." That is as close to identifying McCain as a "liar" without using that word. (Although I have no problem with "McCain is a liar.")

I agree to "Bush/McCain" and/or "McCain/Bush" in every instance that the candidate's position is identified.

user-pic

Such responses are fine, but I'm tired of playing defense. It looks weak and it means that the initial attacks and smear get discussed, which means more exposure in the MSM, increased credibility etc. We need Obama and Dems to go on the offensive. We need McCain to be explaining why he says "country first" when his entire campaign team represents foreign and corporate interests. We need him to defend his votes against clean energy, equal pay for women, the GI Bill, and even the Martin Luther King holiday. I want to see McCain surrogates explain how it is that a man with 10 homes and private plane, who can't even get onto the entry ramp to Information Superhighway, can relate to middle class Americans in the 21st century. None of these issues ever seem to get covered and it's killing me. Even the ads run in the spring by the DNC, featuring McCain's support for 100 years in Iraq and his claims that the economy isn't that bad, were better than what we see now.

Nothing wrong with taking the offensive with our own ads while responding in statements like this to the lies in their ads.

Walking + chewing gum.

The Obama press release statements are kind of weak. There's no hard-hitting language in there that will make for a great soundbite on the news.

You are thinking of launching a FOX-style rantfest, and you won't get it on FOX or the other MSM networks that emulate FOX.

user-pic

Obviously, McCain's smears and lies need to be discredited, but very the fact that the dialogues discussion throughout the media and political world is driven by his attacks is a major problem.

"This is more of the same lies from John McCain that have been discredited, but he continues to repeat them. Perhaps he think the press won't call him out on his repeated lies.

He's trying to hide the truth that his tax proposal is all about giving away money to the big oil companies and the wealthy few that don't care about the pain that regular Americans are facing at the grocery store, the gas pump, and in their homes from utility bills.

McCain is more of the same, just like George W. Bush. Tax cuts for the wealthy, nothing for the middle class. Americans won't be hoodwinked this time by another Republican like McCain. Barack Obama will provide a tax cut for 100 million American families, and he's the one they trust on the economy.

Not John McCain. Another Bush third term."

OK, I've been holding steady with the al giordano/"no chicken littles" model of staying confident and on message. But frankly, I'm beginning to feel a twitch of nervousness that the obama team is not confronting these attacks the way they should be and that they are beginning to have an affect on the race.

Quick, someone tell me I'm being paranoid and to buck it up!

user-pic

I'd like to point out that Al Giordano predicted in the last days of the 2004 campaign that Kerry would win in an electoral landslide, winning at least 330 electoral votes.

I like the guy, but I find this "chicken little" thing of his incredibly counter-productive.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

Interesting. I didn't know that. I do believe Kerry would have won had it not been for the Osama video and whole vote suppression thing. But I don't know what the estimates are of what his win would have been had it not been for those factors.

The Obama campaign needs to release a short, 10-second ad that just says: "John McCain--immature name-caller and outright liar. Is this who you want as your president, America?"

Armchairmen everywhere. Maybe we can get you guys/gals some uniforms or something....


It does no good to call us chicken littles or accuse us of being armchair strategists--many of us have worked in politics, myself included, and the Obama press team needs to be more aggressive in their responses.

It's a bit too wordy, and a bit too weak. It's all reactive, not oppositional, in their defense.

My bad. Thanks for showing me the error of my ways. I can see what you mean though. He's losing by almost every metric. The Obama campaign needs to get their shit together if they ever hope to get back in the game.

My bad. Thanks for showing me the error of my ways. I can see what you mean though. He's losing by almost every metric. The Obama campaign needs to get their shit together if they ever hope to get back in the game.

I suppose I should point out I was trying to be ironic in my post.

I really have to agree. These people know what they're doing. They really do.

user-pic

Thinking about McCain's ads, I wonder ...

Why doesn't Obama's camp run ads saying, "McCain's campaign lies. He knows they're lies. He lies. He lies as a candidate, he'll lie if he becomes President. We're getting rid of one lying President; we must not elect another."

The tag line in the McCain ad "Barack Obama: Economic Disaster" should be re-used but with the linkage of John McCain and George W. Bush.

"McCain called my plan to give tax cut breaks to over 100 million working American middle-class families an "economic disaster" at a time when they're suffering from high gas prices, increases in their grocery budget, and utility bills in the winter.

Let's examine the truth about the economic disaster this country has faced in the past eight years.

John McCain has voted with George W. Bush every single time to increase the federal deficit by continuing the war in Iraq in the past eight years, which has increased gas prices and the cost of groceries at home. McCain also has lobbyists on his campaign that helped sell subprime mortgages to Americans. Millions of homes now have foreclosed. Now that IS an economic disaster.

Can Americans afford four more years of John McCain? He'd be another Bush third term."

Not to be too much of a pinhead, but you keep using the expression, "another Bush third term." We haven't had 1 Bush third term yet (and hopefully we won't ever), so we won't be getting another unless McCain wins and is then reelected in 2012.

Picky, I know. But I like your stuff and I don't like to wince right after you've made a great point.

I think Obama should punk McCain and make it into a campaign ad. Wait until the next time Lieberman and Graham are at one of McCain's houses for a sleepover, and then have something like 20 . . . no, 50! . . . pizzas delivered so he has to ask Cindy for some money to pay for them. Then have David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs jump out from behind a bush (wearing t-shirts that say "McLiar=B3T"), grab all the pizzas, and take off running.

The media would cover that.

Audio of the Corsi interview on CNN is here:
http://www.entertonement.com/collections/2088/Jerome-Corsi

If I could advise the Obama campaign, I'd suggest they hit McCain on fiscal responsibility.

The McCains have a combined personal fortune of nine figures yet carry six-figure debt. The Obamas are certainly wealthy but carry zero debt. They've reportedly always lived well within their means.

If, as reported, Rick Warren gets personal with the candidates, this is what I'd love him to address.

What this country needs is class warfare. There are only a few of the elite rich. There are many middle and lower income workers. People are too stupid to vote their pocket books!

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address