« Obama And Dems Celebrate 73rd Anniversary Of Social Security With Hit On McCain | Home | Study: Troops Deployed Abroad Gave Six Times More To Obama Than To McCain »

Obama And Hillary Reach Deal On How To Conduct Convention

The Hillary and Obama campaigns have finally reached an official deal on how to handle her role at the convention -- her name will be placed in nomination, as a way to assuage her embittered supporters and minimize the possibility of strife at the Denver gathering, according to two sources familiar with the deal.

Obama and Hillary advisers decided that this course was preferable to having her name not introduced, the sources say.

One source confirmed that there will be a roll call vote at the convention, probably on the third day, with her name in entrance, and that Hillary will encourage her supporters to vote for Obama.

"This will recognize the historic nature of the primaries, honor the voices of everyone who participated, and help with party unity," the source says.

The second source says that the Hillary campaign, under pressure from its supporters, expressed concern about her backers making noise at the gathering and finding a way for their voices to be heard. The Obama campaign was also considering how to ensure that and offered the idea of putting her name in nomination, the source says.

This resolution, which was the product of joint negotiations between the two campaigns, runs directly counter to what some Hillary critics in recent days were describing as an effort on her part to hijack the convention proceedings. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, for instance, recently wrote that Hillary "feels no guilt about encouraging her supporters to mess up Barack Obama's big moment."

But people in both the Obama and Hillary camps say that this is pure fiction. Indeed, as Marc Ambinder reported this morning, tensions between the two camps were greatly exaggerated.

Indeed, according to sources, the only problem the Obama camp had was with the tiny minority of vocal Hillary supporters who were threatening to make trouble. Obama advisers say that they had no issue with Hillary or her advisers' handling of the negotiations.

A joint press release on the deal is forthcoming.


Late Update: The joint release on this from Obama and Hillary has now been released.


79 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

it's nice to read some good news about them beginning to (hopefully) mending fences.

Newsflash, everyone! Who thought Hillary Clinton, a superdelegate, wanted to go on record as not supporting the party's nominee? That would have made for Exhibit A for Democrats to blame losing the election on Hillary Clinton.

Same with the other superdelegates, who comprise of 20% of the delegates. They want a political future themselves, and weren't willing to risk it by not voting for the party's nominee.

Hillary knew this all along, which is why she never wanted a roll-call vote in the first place. She didn't want to be embarrassed by getting less than 40% of the delegates. She knows who holds the cards.

This is awesome. Now how about ALL OF US get over it, too.

user-pic

"This will recognize the historic nature of the primaries, honor the voices of everyone who participated, and help with party unity,"

Actually this is Barry planting a big ole kiss on her oversized ass and she'll still try to screw him over before this is done. He is so naive (not in the coded racist way that y'all've been saying McCain uses it...Naive as in "he doesn't realize he's kissing her ass and she still's gonna try to scuff him up" way

Claiming the Obama campaign is naive (and this is a campaign decision, not a personal one) is, of course, asinine and demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the campaign process. They beat the lady with the big ass and this is simply the path of least resistance. Daschle, Plouffe, Axelrod... a fool thinks these are naive men.

user-pic

So Obama doesn't run his campaign? He's just a front man...? Careful...those are racist statements if McCain makes them...

Daschle, Plouffe, Axelrod... a fool thinks these are naive men.

You were responding to "SFC" Wallace, remember.

Obama's not kissing her ass, he's throwing her a bone (and I don't mean that in the sexist misogynistic manner that some overly-sensitive people might assume).

"Naive"?!? He's putting out a potential political fire, one that's been smoldering.

Don't be daft. And avoid spin that requires you to look daft in public.

Great way to pass the torch.

"I want you all to vote for Obama at the convention!!" (wink wink)

user-pic

Exactly

LOL! You're jealous because your convention will be a big snore.

There will be no snoring during the televised portion of the Republican convention. They built afternoon nap time for everyone into the schedule.

They built afternoon nap time for everyone into the schedule.
To be fair, that time also gives the more alert Republican delegates a chance to hire a streetwalker or two. Family values, you know.

They'll be at MSP bathroom stalls or over in Loring Park.

user-pic

So do Dems not have family values?

Unlike your Republicans, their values are those of neither the Manson Family nor the Gambino Family.

I am sure your question was intended more in jest than in earnest, but I would have to say that I agree with Taylor Marsh (man, I never expected to find myself typing those words) that this picture says more than any thousand words could about Obama's family values. You can tell your wife and children that they are the most important thing in your life, but they will know if you mean it by your actions. That Obama can leave off in the middle of the campaign season because he promised his family a vacation demonstrates that he really means it when he says that his family is the most important thing. A well grounded man, that one...

user-pic

It's optional nap time, Obama "Flip Flop Bingo" will be offered in the rotunda from noo till 2.

Can you play bingo with just 2 or 3 squares?

May I suggest a game of McCain Memory?

How it works is you have all of McCain's positions from 2000 and 2008 written on cards and arranged face down. The idea is to match a 2000 position with a 2008 position.

No one ever wins.

That made me laugh. Thanks for that.

user-pic

That's pretty good...No if you go back to his Senate campaign there's pleny of squares on the page...Decriminalization of marijuana...gun rights...offshore drilling...FISA...Driver's Licenses for illegals...heath care for illegals... it goes on and on.

Supposedly there is already a drinking game involving the number of times McCain disingenuously says "My friends...".

John McCain is the Olympic sponsor of the flip flop...

This is really cool..until we see after the convention that this did nothing whatsoever to satisfy the PUMAS. I don't think that anything Obama does, short of giving Hillary his spot, will make her supporters happy...

user-pic

To be fair, I really do think we're talking about a vocal minority of Hillary supporters, not the vast majority. The PUMAs are straight-up whackos who care more about the personalities of the candidates than the issues which will affect millions of people.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

I think you're probably right, but can we please stop equating PUMAs with "her supporters" -- I think my every logical measure they're an EXTREMELY tiny, but extremely vocal minority.

I couldn't agree more, Nick. Who in hell is these frustrated and bitter wieners? Hillary lost...now get over it, PUMA.

I'm hoping that Hill and the PUMAbots aren't entertaining some grand delusions of a nomination coup d'etat. Frankly, I don't think these silly, spoiled people will be satisfied, but whatevs.

I smell coup de'tat in the air. The Clintons cannot be trusted.

Okay, let’s put her name in nomination and recognize her for the remarkable women she is and the great race she ran, gaining almost as many votes as the Democratic nominee, Barack Obama. And lets all try to look past the somewhat less than clean campaign tactics used by some on her side. After all, this is a race and she was just in it to win - Right? Then after we’ve concluded appropriate homage and tribute to Hillary and women all over the world, who just want to be recognized for their contributions in a fair and evenhanded way, then can we drive a steak through the heart of this bitch?

I think this is the best decision. Hillary's dead-enders get to vote for her and get to see her "officially" lose, and it also takes away a huge rallying point for said dead-enders. I just hope all super-delegates vote Obama just to ensure that there is no funny business. I mean if it's largely ceremonial, I think a fair number of her delegates will vote for her even if she asks them to vote for Obama, and I just hope that Obama delegates don't to anything ridiculous and vote Hillary "to show the party is healing". That could be a disaster.

user-pic

This sounds like an almost perfect compromise.  My only worry is whether Hillary really can talk her more strident supporters into not making asses of themselves on the convention floor during the vote.  She'll have to work pretty hard to put that genie back into the bottle.

... tensions between the two camps were greatly exaggerated.

Yeah, but it makes good fodder for the talking heads.  Amiable relations between the camps just doesn't do it for yo-yos like Maureen Dowd.

A Maureen Dowd column is in many ways like a trashy romance novel. It's simultaneously very steamy and very well-written, but in the end it doesn't advance your knowledge or understanding. Totally empty calories.

My only worry is whether Hillary really can talk her more strident supporters into not making asses of themselves on the convention floor during the vote.

Who cares? If a minority of people want to make asses of themselves at the DNC, that's their right.

Look at our Democratic mascot, after all.

Obama and Hillary advisers decided that this course was preferable to having her name not introduced, the sources say.

Too funny. Hillary has the power.

user-pic

Why do I feel like the Obama campaign just provided teeth and venom to the viper?

I think this is a brilliant move on Obama's part. The biggest way to take the wind out of an opponent's sails is to agree to their terms. Once Clinton is nominated and does not get the nomination, there will be no more logical excuses left for her supporters not to support Obama.

This is a win-win for Obama. Some Clinton supporters will turn to him because of his concession and magnanimity. Those HRC's who will spurn Obama would not have supported him anyway.

Obama is cooler and calmer than most of us, which is why we need him to be President.

I guess next, she will force her way to the VP spot...

user-pic

i honestly don't think there is any way possible that sen. clinton take wrest the nomination away from sen. obama. overall public opinion will be against her, independents will be against her, she hasn't raised any money (and you can bet that if it happens, sen. obama won't give her any) party leaders will be pissed because it puts the process in disarray, downticket races will be frustrated even more so because of the allocation of resources and field organizers right when their races will get underway...there are too many reasons why sen. clinton cannot steal the nomination even if she wanted to.

i still think that this is a way to leverage what power she does bring as one of the party elders, someone who still has a lot of large donors behind her, and someone who can still bring female democrats to obama's camp.

i think in using such leverage, she is pushing pretty hard for the vp spot without having to sacrifice pres. clinton.

I think that this is a fine idea. I think that the doomsayers are exaggerating things. I also agree that this will not satisfy the really serious PUMAs, but that is beside the point. Those folks are so tiny and irrelevant a minority that it is not worth the trouble of chasing after them. Good to see that both sides were able to act like grown-ups in order to achieve a desirable outcome. It gives me hope for the future to see mature reason prevail over sophomoric mind games.

This is also sure to rankle a few of the "progressive" blogs out there (i.e. Amato's AmericaBlog) who were (and still are) virulent anti-Clinton hatefests.

Amato's blog is "Crooks and Liars" and I don't find him anti-Clinton at all....John Aravosis runs "Americablog" and yeah, I would say he's not a Clinton fan.

user-pic

This "deal" and the convention won't be the last we hear from these people. I will bet my bottom dollar that we will be dealing with Hillary bullshit in October.

A man's attitude goes some ways toward how a man's life will be, Felix. Is that something you might agree with?

In this case, though, yes, I do kindly expect lots more crap down the line.

Hillary will encourage her supporters to vote for Obama.
.
And what if her supporters insist on ignoring such encouragement? What's plan B, then?


~ Jess


user-pic

they have that choice. sen. clinton cannot forcibly compel any of her hardcore supporters to vote for sen. obama. but by making a truly sincere effort to campaign for him, raise money for him and denounce (is that too strong a word?) any splinter "hillary for president" support groups, i would wager that a (electorally) significant portion of her supporters will vote for sen. obama in november.

what if her supporters insist on ignoring such encouragement?

Then they vote for Clinton, and lose. Even if every Clinton-supporting delegate and the convention voted for her (and I doubt that will be the case) she would lose the vote. And that's not even counting Superdelegates, the overwhelming majority of whom I think will be strongly motivated to vote Obama.

I dunno...I don't trust her...I don't like it...
But I'll trust Obama's judgment.

I can't help but wonder - if the roles were reversed - if we'd be bending over backwards for Obama's name to be put in nomination...?

God - I can't wait until this convention is OVER and it's official.

I can't help but wonder - if the roles were reversed - if we'd be bending over backwards for Obama's name to be put in nomination...?

Does it matter? The roles are not reversed. We won, you know. Why, instead of celebrating our hard-won victory, are so many of my fellow Obama supporters determined instead to dwell bitterly on our grievances against the Clintons?

PTSD, maybe?

Sorry, not funny when you use an avatar of a war veteran.

Meh, I'm a war veteran myself so I don't give a rat's ass.

Ah, then you know better but you said it anyway. Excellent discipline!

Dude, wtf? Do you really think it's wrong for me to have a McCain-Bush avatar and post "PTSD" as a comment that's unrelated to McCain? I'm not joking about McCain having PTSD so grow up.

FYI, PTSD isn't only caused by combat. It can also be caused by a car accident, for example. ...Or a long-fought primary election.

We don't want them to continue to hold positions of power in the party. Collaborators in the destruction of the middle class are just as much a problem as the GOP oligarchs determined to rush us all right back into the 19th century gilded age.

Nothing will placate the Clintons. Particularly after the embarrassing leak of the memos. Bill was running the show. That's what we found out. Bill, not HRC. Legacy of former Prez shattered, foundation of her run on "experience" shattered.

It's futile. He could hand her the nomination and it still wouldn't be enough.

Reconciliation is never easy.

I hope this agreement ends the conflict, but there's always some people who never will be satisfied. Still, those people is a small minority.

PUMA's: back off!

user-pic

This is a horrible situation. Hillary clearly cares about nothing but Hillary. It's simply outrageous that she hasn't worked to aggressively shut this down by refusing to allow it. She should have conceded--not suspended.

This will weaken Obama. It's a bad idea, and it's one last cheap shot from the Clintons. God, I'm glad Hillary will never be president.

I agree. This is a terrible 'solution'.

It's like giving in to a child having a temper tantrum. They learn that if they scream loud and long enough, they'll get their way.

Ignore them, and voila, no more temper tantrums.
Too bad the Obama camp and the DNC are allowing the Clintons to manipulate them. It won't end with this. There will be more and more demands.

The Clintons care about the Clintons.
Period.

user-pic

My wife, every time they talk about this on television says, "That b*tch is up to something. They shouldn't trust her for a second." I think I agree.

I'm sorry, but half the comments in this thread are completely depressing. I've been an Obama supporter since day one, it was a tough primary, the Clintons pissed me off repeatedly, but it's over. Hillary has been extraordinarily classy since she conceded and it's time to give her her due and MOVE ON. I've never seen so much sore winning in my life.

There's no "evil plan" -- can we get back to focusing on the goddamn Republicans so we can win an election? Hillary has millions of loyal supporters and we can use their tenacity and their strength. The PUMA nutjobs can go to hell. I, for one, am really happy over this deal. Quit dwelling on the past and change your country.

I'd guess the point to those comments is to depress you. :)

user-pic

This makes me SICK! How dare she steal Obama's show. If you want to claim it brings people together then we should add Dodd, Biden, Richardson, Edwards and Kucinich to the roll call too.

I don't know what Hillary has on Obama but he's caved and I'm ashamed of him for doing so.

If Hillary ever runs again in the future -- I for one will not be voting for her. She's done nothing but try and harm our party from day one.

Can't you people just somehow get over this?

Me neither. You don't have to be a damn Nostradamus to hear even now the loud boos that Hillary will draw out from her twisted malcontents when she "urges" them in her irresolute dog-whistling way to support or at least tolerate Obama. Nor does it take a shaman priest to foresee the catty smile on her face when she drinks in the glory of those delicious boos. Or to foresee their explanation that shitting on the convention was a really necessary step vital to all, that the boos were healthy and made for a stronger Party, and that it just couldn't have been stopped anyway. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

I for one, haven't forgotton Clinton ran to the arms of Fox and Richard Melon Scathe when she thought it would help her. You can't do deals with the devil and then pretend to be an angel!
I'll begin to think about party unity and get over Hillary, when Hillary gets over Hillary!

You want change. Change against politics as usual, discrimination against ethnic racism, movement toward global environmental issues. Yet the support group of change still within it's group as I read has some of the most egregious sexist comments that exist. Can't have it both ways "guys". I'm assuming the women here didn't comment on the small size of your mail anatomy, or the size of Obama's body parts when referencing his politics.

I for one have seen my mom and sister put up with these, sorry guy's, stupid male comments and those of us that look for equity, don't abide by going for the cheap shot and making such sexist comments as commenting on the size of a woman's rear, expecially a so competent. It's an OLD boy ploy and nothing toward change. Frankly it speaks to his small anatomy, and insecurity.

user-pic

"your mail anatomy"

Leave the postal service out of this!

Get off your high horse. I'm guessing you're referring to the talk of "kissing her big ass?" Would saying "kiss her average size buttocks" be more appropriate? Negativity toward Hillary doesn't automatically equate to sexism.

If I told someone to kiss Karl Rove's fat ass, would that be sexist? Doesn't really make sense.

I am sure she is going to say, but I win...
Only my votes count...Votes from caucuses don't count. I won the big states...Only the big states matter...
This is outrageous...

An 'accord', you make it sound like two countries coming together... http://www.enewsreference.wordpress.com

user-pic

A couple of points and a comment.

The TV pundits will be able to engage in a boring over/under game of how many votes does Hillary Clinton get, and what is the meaning of the actual number of votes?

In conventions of 20 years ago, with more than one nominee, there was a lot of time wasted with the nomination speech, the "spontaneous" demonstration parade of delegates after that nomination speech, and the string of "I second the nomination speech" done by the favorites of the nominee even if the nominee had no hope of coming in first or second. That frivolity can chew up hours of prime time. Has it gone the way of the dodo in this era of a certain nominee?

Comment: 48 hours after these nomination speeches take place, no one will give a damn what happened with the Clinton vote.

True, let us not forget McGovern accepting the nomination in the middle of the night, when no one was watching, because of all the speechifying. I half to believe that Obama’s organization (as has demonstrated to date) is too well organized to allow complete chaos to happen!

SORRY...but the ClintonS are TURDS and I will NEVER get over what she and that megalomaniac husband did during the primary.....they can both kiss my grits!

user-pic

I think BronxInTN calls it right.
And I have a hard time reading some of the paranoid comments about Hilary somehow getting the nomination. Not going to happen. And if she did somehow politic, manipulate and scheme her way to the nomination anyway, I think I'd have to vote for her. After all, who wouldn't vote for Wonder Woman (and that's what she'd have to be to pull that off).

This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. I've always lived with the idea, that I might as well of done something to be damned about.

If he doesn't allow her name to be nominated, then the PUMAS will go bonkers at the convention, stirring up all sorts of $#!+. So this is supposed to shut them up.

The problem is, last week Obama authorized the FULL count of the Michigan and Florida delegates. All she needs to do is to extort some super-delegates into changing there votes, and Holy $#!+ Batman.

scobiewon the problem with that is all her super's (well a majority I would say" have now backed Obama and will vote for him. Michigan and Fl were both given full votes also in the hopes of party unity. MY GOODNESS if people don't see this guy is going OUT OF HIS WAY to make things right than who does. For that matter SO IS HILLARY. They both realize what is at stake and I commend them for their work. LET'S TAKE THE WHITE HOUSE.


P.S.F*&@ PUMA

I have never seen such paranoia; outside of the Republican Party anyway. Answer this, oh tinfoil-hat wearers: if Sen. Clinton is such an all-powerful, magnificently omnicompetent politician - why didn't she WIN the primaries? Why would she put herself in the position of getting the nomination under such circumstances as to guarantee a loss in November?
The only way for Sen. Clinton to get the nomination now and still have a chance of winning the presidency would be if Sen. Obama's campaign literally collapsed between now and the convention. I really don't think that's going to happen. And as a supporter of Sen. Clinton during the primaries, I don't want to even think about such a mess.
If this is the way you guys act when your candidate wins, I really don't want to contemplate what would have occured had Sen. Obama lost! AmericaBlog at its most rabidly anti-Clinton would be civilized in comparison.
You guys won - learn to live with it!

It ain't over until it's over! I've got two newspapers in my office hanging on the wall. One says, Tom Dewey Wins and the other says Al Gore Wins Presidency!

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address