« McCain's New Attack Line: Obama Is Not A Flip-Flopper | Home | Poll: McCain Retakes Lead In Florida »

New McCain Ad: Will "Biggest Celebrity In The World" Help Your Family?

Whoa. The McCain campaign is sticking with the "celebrity" sneer, releasing a new ad that again refers to Obama as the "biggest celebrity in the world" and develops the contrast a bit more by asking whether this big celebrity is really going to "help your family."...

Interestingly, Britney Spears and Paris Hilton don't make cameos in this latest spot, which will run in "key states," according to the McCain camp.

As I reported here the other day, the McCain team was devoting a third of its ad budget to the first celeb ad. That, combined with the fact that they're sticking with the "celeb" theme, suggests that internal polling shows it may be working.

The "celeb" epithet is all about cheapening the mass political support for Obama and redefining the Obama movement as one that's less about politics and issues and more about cult of personality. By asking whether this "celebrity" is prepared to help your family, the McCain team is trying to get people to see whatever temptation they may have to support Obama as somehow fundamentally misguided and not rooted in what's really important.


Late Update: The ad will be cycled into the McCain camp's buy in CO, IA, MI, MO, NV, NH, NM, OH, PA, VA (NoVA) and WI.

Late Late Update: The Obama campaign responds.


174 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Two things:

1) The "celebrity" epithet is very effective. It's odious and baseless, but effective.

2) When, oh, when, are pundits going to start publicly questioning and writing articles calling out McCain for this since he's the one who:

- Was in "Wedding Crashers"

- Was in "24"

- Hosted "Saturday Night Live"

- Has been on the "Daily Show" more than any guest in history?

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

Before mcCain started using the 'celebrity' smear the mainstream media was consistently using 'rockstar' derisively to describe Obama's mass appeal to the citizenry. So, of course, it will stick.

Both descriptors are disdainful of his popularity and connote that popularity with meaningless pop culture phenomenon.

user-pic

Yeah, they may need to make it clear that McCain is the original celebrity and appeared before 50,000 bikers at Sturgis before someone from American Idol and Kid Rock took the stage. Sounds like a celebrity!

They can also hit him with clueless on the economy, horrible on virtually every domestic policy, total 180 since 2000, old, prone to confusion on the stump, and same as Bush/Cheney. Is that why McCain is trying to hide Cheney, keeping him out of the RNC?

Another option would be to run some Kennedy and MLK, Jr. footage as a rebuttal and to remind folks that popular leaders can change the world. It's not about celebrity, it's about building a broad coalition for change. Throw in some newspaper references to how much more detailed Obama's policies and plans are and how purposely vague McCain has been.

Something like "I wish I had the acting career John's had. He's been in Wedding Crashers and 24. I've been on SNL but he's hosted an entire episode!"

Then, to really twist the knife, "He also acts like he's committed to getting us out of Iraq."

Good news, the estimable Chuck Todd is now pointing out McCain's celebrity on his First Read blog.

Funny I was just thinking how awkward the whole phrasing is: "Biggest celebrity in the world . . ." doesn't roll of the tongue and is pretty awkward. Instead of biggest celebrity, why not do a parody of Obama on The Simple Life or call him a rock star on a world tour or portray his bid for the White House as a reality TV bit.

I get that the "celebrity" angle may have some traction but it could be sooo much better done. McCain's press people really suck.
I get that the "celebrity" angle may have some traction but it could be sooo much better done. McCain's press people really suck.

user-pic

Well said. On the other hand, since when are most Americans allergic to celebrities?

correct, we are a secular nation where we hold our celebs up on the pedistal. I kind of dont see how being a celebrity is all that wrong. honestly



Delaware GOP, Ting, Booted 4 Secretly Supporting Obama

And, upon what empirical evidence do you base this flat contention that the celibrity epithet is "very effective?"

McCain campaign's really getting a Jan Brady vibe to it these days.

user-pic

Let's see here, who is really going to help my family. The guy who is a big celebrity or the guy who is obsessed with the other guy's celebrity?

I'm gonna go with #1.

Right on target.

Yes, typically folks understand that the greater the person's mass appeal the more influential they are when it comes to swaying opinions and getting attention to policies.

Most families pick the guy to advocate and represent them who 'knows the most people' because the do understand the power of networking and how it is wielded, on their jobs, in their communities and in the public square.

Protests typically are not effective it is only when they become mass protests that things get done. Same for individuals who protest higher wages it is only when they become a union with mass membership that things get done.

So maybe the response to this ad is 'why doesn't mcCain respect that unions get things done for families...and Obama supports unions so he is ready to support families with jobs, health insurance and tax cuts.

that is the power of the masses.

Or perhaps he could point out that 'we are the ones we have been waiting for'...use the Oregon rally backdrop vs. Berlin..to describe what mcCain is fearful of when it comes to representing families.

Obama needs to turn 'rockstar' and 'celebrity' into 'mass advocacy' 'mass citizen activism' or 'democracy in action'

That is what helps Americans, our nations and most importantly our families.

time to flip the script just like Paris did.

This ad lacks the "edge" of the first one. Looks lame and lifeless. Of course the media will take it, but the impact will be minor. Sequels usually don't do better, with exceptions like "The Dark Knight"...

...and this sir, it's NOT like The Dark Knight.


It's going to backfire, specially after Hilton turn back on McCain "oldness"...

Barack Obama: Right on Tire Gauges!

The big problem is that he is mixing too messages: that obama is insubstantial inthe way celebrities are, and he is worng on policy. The problem is that Mccain's accusation: higher taxes, more government= less jobs is contradicted by 8 years of experience. Big tax cuts, big spending increases (because of expensive , and misguided war)and the worst job growth record of any president in the last 50 years.

Bill Clinton's tax policy= one of the fastest job growth records in the last 50 years (and guess what, Carter's was even better).

Bush/McCain tax cuts for the rich= worst job growth record. It sucks to have to argue agsint facts like this.

McCain wants it to be about ideology, but giant deficits, inflation, and a historically crappy jobs record will be a little too obvious to ignore.

user-pic

McCain's campaign is pitiful. Obama draws crowds, whereas McCain's people have to look for someplace there's going to be a crowd anyway (like Sturgis, most recently) and try to get their man in front of it. I can't wait for the debates; that's gonna clinch it.

user-pic

Wait 'til he loses his temper in a debate. As McCain bumbles around the talking points and listens to the Schmidt bug in his ear, Obama will mop the floor with him. McCain can't think on his feet. Obama can.
Then FNC will again call him arrogant, dogwhistle for "uppity".

This is off-topic, but speaking of debates, does anyone know why Obama doesn't want to do the town hall meetings McCain has proposed? Wouldn't those be good for Obama?

Barack Obama has shown during the course of his campaign restraint in playing trump cards. See the roll out of SDs during the primary. Since I'm confident he'll clean the floor with John McCain when they appear together, I assume he has a strategic reason for not rushing towards that meeting. Besides he did offer at least one town hall with McCain. But the McCain camp seems determined to make a political football of the issue.

user-pic

"...does anyone know why Obama doesn't want to do the town hall meetings McCain has proposed?"
Cuz he sucks at them compared to McCain; no reason to go into the cage with the lion when you can just poke him with a stick through the bars.

The "so, fewer jobs" connection is pretty weak. It's clear the campaign thinks all it has to do is mention taxes and the American people will revolt. Obama is doing a good job against this bs but it sure would be nice if Bill could get over his snit and start hitting McCain on the economy.

Specially coming for the man who advocates free trade in places hurt like Ohio and Michigan.

The unions have to take this and hit him hard.

user-pic

Typical GOP Laffer Curve BS. They constantly lie about any tax cut creating jobs, when the facts show otherwise.

The idea that more government spending leads to job losses is even more ridiculous. Who does John McCain thinks pays all those highway workers?

Obama should hit him again on ignorance. I bet he can get some swing voters using an American greatness and not wanting to be stupid theme. We can remain competitive with the rest of the world, or we can wallow in our stupidity and fall behind.

This celebrity thing is going to backfire once we get to the debates. Obama's going to own McCain. And how's it going to look when a 'celebrity' runs circles around the 'ole man on policy issues?

That was exactly my thought. In the context of a debate, Obama doesn't come across as a "celebrity" -- he comes across as a very smart, articulate, responsible guy. Pretty much the opposite of Britney Spears.

Does anyone else notice how Obama always looks darker in complexion in these McCain advertisements? Reminds me of OJ on the infamous Time cover years ago.

user-pic

That is an interesting question. But I'll also say that as a general rule in politics you want to depict your opponent with darker, dreary lighting, even if you have to manipulate the picture levels to get there.

I understand that that is the practice, but perhaps even when applied to white candidates, it is tinged with a degree of racism. (The darker the complexion of anyone, the less trustworthy they seem.)

user-pic

It's not really racism, as it's universal, including in African cultures, that black is associated with evil. Although if I was going to manipulate images of McCain, I'd put him in bright lighting to emphasize how pale, pasty, and old-looking he is.

Yes, I notice this. I also note how no one identifies shyt like that as 'playing the race card' either...just like the Hilton/spears (known for being scantily clad) in the other ad were not ideentified as 'playing the race card' nor is calling the candidate 'presumptious' playing the race card' nor putting his face on the 100 dollar bill playing the race card when the GOP does it ..it is not 'playing the race card'

Only Obama can 'play the race card' after all even Bill Clinton says so!

The racemongering is so blatant that it is being 'inyourface' denied by white folks who like Gergen say..'get it' when they see this stuff labeling him as 'the one' 'celebrity' 'the messiah'.

The hypocrisy of white America when it comes to race is alive and well.

The newest twist is that racemongering and racebaiting doesn't mean you are a racist.

Kinda like Spears/Hilton..just cause you are scantily clad and have incidents where everyone in public knows you have no underwear on...it doesn't mean that you are a skank or a whore.


riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!!

There are no racists in America...only race baiters and racemongerers like the GOP and the Clintons.

There are no racists in America...only race baiters and racemongerers like the GOP and the Clintons.

It's just coincidence that 97% of African Americans are supporting Obama. No racism there.

God, you children are stupid.

Is it a coincidence that 90% of whites vote for white candidates for President since the country began?
Is it a coincidence that you fail to realize that blacks are the most loyal constituency in the Democratic party?

Is it a coincidence that 90% of blacks vote Democratic and have done so for the past 4 dcades?

Is it a coincidence that no white Democratic candidate has received the majority of the white vote for President since 1968 when LBJ passed the Civil Rights ACT.

Is it a coincidence that without the black vote 67% of white candidates would not get elected to Congress or the Senate?

Is it a coincidence that you know little about the successful political candidacies of most Democratic politicians.

I bet you listen to Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan a lot and fail to do any research on your own.

No one seems to notice when 90% of whites vote for the white guy!!

WHY is THAT?

Sorry, pal. You're not comparing apples to apples. Anybody who votes for someone based on race is a racist. Anybody who says otherwise is a fool.

To claim that only white people can be racist is beyond foolish. It's incredibly stupid.

Sorry, pal. You're not comparing apples to apples. Anybody who votes for someone based on race is a racist. Anybody who says otherwise is a fool.

To claim that only white people can be racist is beyond foolish. It's incredibly stupid.

user-pic

Right! I mean, the fact that 90% of black voters voted for John Kerry means they're obviously racist!

Oh wait...

Did they vote for him because he's not a Republican? If so, they were being smart.
Did they vote for him because he's white? If so, they were being racist.

I repeat: Anybody who votes for somebody based on race is a racist. Period.

user-pic

Okay, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you didn't realize that 90-95% of blacks are going to vote for the Democrat regardless of what color they are. But maybe you actually are too stupid to realize that that doesn't mean they're voting for Obama because he's black?

Or, alternatively, you're too stupid (maybe just naive?) to believe otherwise.

On the off-chance you just now started coming here, a little history: "Anybody who doesn't like Obama is a racist. Anybody who likes Clinton over Obama is a racist." You children are trying to have it both ways, and you reek of hypocrisy. And racism, as it turns out.

user-pic

Just because the ParisBritney ad shaved a few points off of Obama's lead doesn't mean the next one will have the same effect.
Obama can stick to the issues without ad hominem smears. McCain has no issues that he hasn't flip-flopped on and Obama can advertise that. The biggest one this week is all the money McCain has received from oil companies that coincides with his drill drill drill message.

But did it shave a few points? It sure looks like the polls are all reverting to form, with Obama up around five points. Much was made when the Gallup tracker went from nine up to tied, but I've long suspected the volatility of tracking polls makes them unreliable as a day-to-day guage. Here's a political scientist explaining why: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/05/is-obamas-lead-in-gallup_n_117058.html

Seems that the point of the add is that Obama is not really substantial, compared to McCain. Now, they may be going with this theme because it is "working," because it is the only thing that they've got, or because all the Rovians McCain has working for him are not as bright as they are supposed to be. (By now, even the MSM has gotten the idea that Rove is not a genius). The problem that McCain is going to have with this as a campaing long theme is that, everytime Obama and McCain speak in public it is Obama that comes off as much more substantial and with it. While I don't think we should underestimate McCain, and I think he'll do ok at the debates, his ads are, in effect, setting a low bar for Obama. If Obama is really as vapid as McCain says he is, then McCain ought to be able to wipe the floor with him at the debates. When that does not happen, McCain's theme falls apart. In addition, McCain is throwing away his brand as Mr. Maverick by aping Bush campaign techniques, which fits in nicely with Obama's argument that McCain is Bush 2. This is not to say that McCain's tactics won't work -- the two-term Bush disaster shows how things can go ary -- but I think McCain's thugs are second rate wannabes.

I think the Olympics is the perfect backdrop..to go for the GOLD in leadership ads.

They should show McCain talking about how he graduated 5th from the bottom in the Naval Academy..show Bush talking about his dismal academic scholarship and Cheney talking about how you can drop out of Yale and become VP...and then talk about their disastrous policies

Followed by...listing Obama as being a magna cum laude Columbia grad, harvard law review President and summa cum laude Harvard Law Grad.

Then ask isn't it time for America to once again have the best lead her?

We need Gold medal leadership...in the spirit of the Olympics

Isn't that the entire point of the Olympics..countries send their best?

WTF...why shouldn't America have the best and brightest when it comes to the Presidency, as well?

The Olympics provide the perfect background to highlight what is wrong with all this 'maverick mishap' leadership.

Ummm - this is not an effective ad. It makes McCain seem small. And it reminds people that Obama is popular. That's about all it accomplishes. To anyone who already hates Obama, this ad is perfect! In other words: within the McCain bubble, this is a clever ad! But who is this convincing?

We've never seen a candidate for President run ads this childish in the history of our nation. Those of you (up thread) who think a couple of points in a tracking poll means an ad is effective need to retake that political science 101 class.

Whats the old joke, no body goes to that restaurant anymore its too crowded.

So now it's: nobody likes that guy because he so popular.

Maybe they are going for the introvert social outcast, slightly artsy kid in high school vote?

When you put it that way, it makes me think of Nixon, actually . . .

I don't think this trick works twice. Through humor you sometimes can make a point (true or not) that people will consider. But, the second time around it is not as funny and people start to focus on the ridiculousness of your argument!

I really think the Republicans are using the whole "celeb" idea to weaken/diminish the bump Barack will get from the convention--especially after the acceptance speech.

This line of attack worked beauuuuuutifully when the Democrats tried it on Reagan. It worked in 1966 when Reagan defeated a popular Democratic incumbent governor, in 1970 when he got re-elected and in 1980 when he defeated Carter. Oh, and it also worked against Schwarzenegger. Brilliant team McCain, brilliant.

Where this strategy really pays off, as the above examples demonstrate, is at the debates, when the public is conditioned to see the "celebrity" as a lightweight stuck on a few shallow talking points and the substantive opponent as quick on his feet. Then, the "celebrity" shows that he has every bit as much, if not more, substance, and lo and behold the celebrity loses for not knowing his place.

Again, Bravo, team McCain.

This is classic Rove - turn your opponents strength into their weakness. Of course Obama is doing the same thing with McCain and his "straight talk" and "maverick" selling points.

I just don't understand how this "celebrity" tag is really effective, but maybe I'm just too biased to really consider it as it must be polling well with the McCain focus groups.

I'm not sure if Obama should even bother rebutting the celebrity attack. Because if he responded it would become a MSM talking point however it might be a great line in a debate. You know John will mention Obama as a celebrity in one of his answers, and Obama could seize the opportunity to make the point about how silly this celebrity stuff is, because in reality there is only one candidate who appeared in a major motion picture, and only one candidate on stage who appeared on a hit television show and only one candidate on stage who hosted Saturday Night Live and that it wasn't Barack Obama.

I agree. I don't get how conceding that your opponent is wildly popular is a good move for you.

Were the "celebrity" ads moving the polls, or was it the whole "race card" brouhaha? Personally, I'm pretty sure the McCain camp doesn't poll or test their messages so they see what gets a lot of press and figure they'll try it again.

Given that the polls are back where they were pre-Obama-abroad and pre-celebrity, I'm not sure any of this is affecting the fundamentals in the race. McCain is stuck at 43 percent. Obama has a 3-4 point lead. And the numbers move up or down a bit based on who is preceived as "winning."

user-pic

"This is classic Rove - turn your opponents strength into their weakness."

That's nearly verbatim what I was going to post.

And, I'd add it's bizarre that popularity is made out to be a weakness. I think this Rovian tactic may have jumped the shark -- or the tracks.

And, to make the international support for Obama a negative is also a bit weird in these times when our nation has increasingly become a pariah.

I just hope the Obama camp doesn't respond in typical Dem fashion - ignore it and hope it goes away. they need to hit back hard.

I think the picot point inthe debate is pretty easy, and it doesn;t have to be a joke it just has to be humble. and the turnaround is to point out that the epithet is not an insult to Obama it is an insult to the people.

All he has to say is: John's been going around calling me a celebrity because lot's of people have come out to hear what we have to say [we, not I]. They have been coming out in droves because they know this country is heading in the wrong direction. They are coming out because they feel their leaders are not looking out for them, but for the special interest and big money donors. They are coming out because they want affordable access to health care. They want economic growth that benefits everyone , not just those at the top. they are coming out because they want a real energy policy, not poll-tested gimmicks designed not to solve problems but win elections. They are coming out because they want their sons and daughters and father and mothers to come home from a strategically misguided war...

On and on. I think that would be game set and match. It would be nice to see live in a debate when everyone is watching. Heck he doesn't even have to wait for McCain to say celebrity, which frankly id do not think he would dare in a debate. He can just put it in anywhere he wants now that McCain has force fed the electorate with the predicate.

I LIKE that!! Awesome answer Economides..send that to the campaign

They already know it. They are just baiting the hook.

user-pic

The only problem is, when you make an argument that roundly appeals to a majority of TPM posters, you shore up a good 21% of the vote (not that 21% post here, but that's the "Liberal base" of the party). Obama's got to come up with something besides "Hope and change" that's gonna pull in another 27% (I think 48% will win it this time).

Gotcha! Good point.

Ditto!!!

I love it!!!! It's to the point and will make the rest of America think about and really listen to what he, Barack has to say.

This a loser for McSame the evil OLD reTHUGlican nasty troll

Obama just owned McCain in Indiana after McCain flip-flopped on tire gauges last night. Shame to CNN for cut the speech in the middle of this.

Barack Obama: Right on tire gauges!

user-pic

Didn't we have a president named Reagan that happened to be a celebrity?

I don't recall McCain or conservatives having a problem with him.

And he didn't have any particular qualification to hold the office of president.

Certainly less than anyone in this contest.

Actually, there's a video on YouTube that makes this point.

user-pic

I just posted something about Reagan downthread - I hadn't read the whole thread yet - I see I was on the same wavelength you were on - if McLame isn't careful, he's going to turn Obama into Reagan in some people's eyes.

user-pic

"If McLame isn't careful here he's going to turn Obama into Reagan."
...only in an a parrallel universe where Spock is evil and has a gotee...

user-pic

Well, generally speaking, I think two terms as governor of the biggest state in the country qualifies you you to be president.

user-pic

In the wake of this "celebrity" dust-up and the chance that it may be working, I wonder if Obama, if he could do it over, would have decided NOT to give his speech at Invesco field. I thought it was a dicey decision at the time because it fed into the less attractive, cultish, messianic side of Obama's appeal. I mean, everyone knows he can draw a huge crowd - you know, like a "celebrity."

user-pic

Let's see . . . Who is more likely to get a realty TV show back to back with the Family Jewels:

The clean-cut young guy with two young kids and still on his first wife . . .

OR . . .

The bat-shit crazy, Dick Cheney devotee with the undead, bazillionaire retreaded maul for a soulmate?

Bazillionaire retreaded maul for a soulmate? OUCH!

Yawn. Voters have so moved on from this John McCain foolishness. Only median pundits and the mainstream media is interested in this trivial comical garbage.

user-pic

Remember that time Barack Obama hosted Saturday Night Live? Oh wait...that was John McCain.

Here's abcnews.com in May '08 reporting on McCain...before they started getting the new talking points:

"And this Saturday he will: Sen. McCain, R-Ariz., is scheduled to make a cameo appearance on 'Saturday Night Live' this weekend in New York.

So far, the campaign is tight-lipped on the nature of his appearance, but in the race to November both his Democratic rivals have made appearances in recent weeks on the long-running sketch comedy staple on NBC.

McCain hosted the program back in 2002, memorably playing then-Attorney General John Ashcroft in one sketch, and singing a retinue of Barbara Streisand songs in another.

"I've been in politics for over twenty years, and for over twenty years I've had Barbara Streisand trying to do my job," McCain joked during the skit. "So I decided to try my hand at her job."

You can watch the video HERE.

McCain is a regular on the late-night circuit. Last week marked his eleventh in-studio interview with Jon Stewart on 'The Daily Show'. He announced his candidacy for the White House on 'The Late Show' with David Letterman in 2007, and last month appeared on that program as his host ribbed him about his age."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/05/live-from-new-y.html

So bad, it tempts me to give him money so he can run more of this crud.

Kathleen,

my sentiments exactly. And you know what? You've inspired me to donate more money to the Obama campaign. Can u still donate $5 to the campaign?

Gave $50 in Happy Birthday money on Monday. That's it for this week!

I think it time to talk about McCain's age and lack of his own "celeb" status. I wouldn't put up with this crap anymore.

Since I believe that McCain is somewhat envious of Obama’s youthful energy and natural charisma, so that I am certain McCain would not mind a little "Diva" attention too, if only McCain could get it. Remember that fundraising forum at the Phoenix Convention Center in Arizona? The forum had to be cancelled due to non-participation of supporters and was consequently, an unexpected blow for McCain, who continues to have a rather hard time generating financial backing even among stalwart Republican contributors.

But apparently NOT from Big Oil.

How about a commerical showing how nobody is showing up to McCain fundraisers forums in Phoenix AZ, and MORE distortions about McCains "drill for more oil" and why does McCain want a 100 year war in Iraq (to guarding the oil), and last by not least, why McCain appears to old to even make it into congress to vote on important issue. If McCain can't do his job, maybe McCain is too sick and old, or maybe McCain is just a lazy Republibican, who is quoted as wanting Americans to work two jobs.

McCain wishes he were a celeb, but instead he is just lazy old man, who is very cozy indeed with all of Bush's oil buddies.


I am completely stunned to see everyone thinking this is effective.
See, Paris Hilton and Britney are famous but dumb and useless so I can see the message here.
But how is merely calling him a "celebrity" an insult ? Oscar-winners are celebrities. Most people have a celebrity they adore.
I don't get it.

You don't get it Ben?

Can you name a celebrity you adore that you would pick as President of the Unite States to be Commander in Chief of our military forces?

Tom Hanks, perhaps.

user-pic

I'm holding out for LudaNation -

I think it needs to begin with Obama picking Luda as his veep.

Luda will in turn pick Missy Elliott, when he becomes president, and then Missy will be our first Woman President! She's the only one who can work it like that.

This is my dream I also often dream that heaven is a big club and I've got a table reserved already and Tupac is holding it down til I get there.

lol lol TenaX

I would looooove to see the look on HRC's face when Missy Elliott became the VP pick
and just howl with delirious laughter
when those 18 Million voters...saw their first female VP.

Feminism is so racist...hahahahaha...ain't nary one of those feminists came out defending Michelle.
The hypocrisy is sooo deafening.

user-pic

O I hate hearing that - but I know it's true.

I have so lost my patience with my "sisters." They are acting ridiculous - they are acting like the wounded wives in a messy divorce.

What makes me most feed up is the affirmative action entitlement that white females wallow in.

Black females and blacks are affirmative action hires and do not earn their positions. But white women are entitled based on gender..hahahaha...and the real cruel irony is that they are the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action while denouncing it as some race based program while capitalizing on their affirmative action gender status.

Unbelievable.
White women like Ferraro and Clinton are the biggest affrimative action political figures in history..yet they accuse Obama of 'playing the race card'...all while they play the whitefemaleentitlement card?

And Michelle Obama who is black and female just withers on the vine.

They do not even attempt to stand with her as a sister at all.

The entitled white female in America is a real issue they lay at the root of the affirmative action problem...carrying the mantle of racism while benefitting from the spilt blood of thousands who died for civil rights. No other group plays the 'reverse racism card' more than entitleed white females.

Even now they are still clamoring for Hillary to be on the ballot in Denver.

Sigh..
entitlement is a bytch

user-pic

Yes, and one of the toughest goddamn things to battle -

Part of being entitled is never having to think about it -

Yep.
Elizabeth on The View is the poster child for white female entitlement

Can you name a celebrity you adore that you would pick as President of the Unite States to be Commander in Chief of our military forces?

David Lee Roth.

Who's he?

user-pic

You did not just ask that!?! I bet you never owned a Camero either!

www.iroc-z.com/

all you need now is a mullet and a can of bud...

No Camero, but owned one of the first VW bugs.

california girls, man!!

Obama needs to counter the "Biggest Celebrity in the World" tag with a "Most Interesting Man in the World" commercial.

"Barack Obama doesn't look like all of the other presidents on our bills, because they all aspire to look like him."

"Barack Obama only shoots three pointers because two pointers are too easy for him... Three pointers are also too easy for him."

"Barack Obama would never enter his wife in a topless beauty pageant... But if he did, she would win it without taking her top off."

Hire this guy.

kool maybe we can get another Paris Hilton hit.....

user-pic

It's worth noting that it's standard GOP politics to attack the Democrat based on your own weakness. It's McCain that is the substance-free celebrity with no plans and making the Obama 'Celebrity' attack is a way to remove the 'McCain has no substance' charge from the Obama playbook.

One way to interpret this is that they are saying Obama is popular but vacuous. That will not work of course because he is much smarter and detail oriented than McCain it is easy to contradict. the "empty suit" vitriol from the Clinton primary supporters was similarly stupid.

The more nefarious implication is that they will morph this into Obama is manipulating the masses. He has another agenda (cf. Farrakhan, rev,. Wright, etc...) and all he is doing is reaping adulation for when he needs it to impose his radical vision on the country. There's really only one political reference that makes any of this stick--hint he wasn't blonde, but lots of his followers were.

"The One" ad was closer to pushing this image. I really don't think they are going to go down this road. It would pretty much destroy McCain. Mind you, I am sure Ann Coulter will be pushing it pretty hard at some point.

The Ad is lame and not that effective. There is nothing wrong in being celebrity.

What Gbenga said.

Where is America's fear and loathing of celebrity?

user-pic

No shit.

If McLame isn't careful here he's going to turn Obama into Reagan.

And we hated Reagan - but a lot of people didn't.

Interesting. They're going all in on the celeb. gambit. It may have some affect, as before, but they're smarmy sarcasm belies their desperation.

The correct repsonse is not to take it seriously(defuse it), one, and two, to hit back with something like -

- Compared to Bush's popularity, I'd be a celbrity if I was running for student council president.

- Looks like the "maverick" lost his spurs.

- You think I'm popular now? Wait til I'm elected!

- I give all the credit to my wife and kids.

etc.

Sorry Roadkill

It has tremendous appeal to the demographic who it is aimed at, you know the WWII generation, who come out to vote in mass numbers in elections?
You know the Bob Schieffer and mcCain peer group.

That demographic is not celebrity struck when it comes to voting for the President of the United States.

They do NOT want some vacuous celebrity in the oval office.

So the line has great impact every single time that demogrpahic hears it, they cringe at the very thought of some upstart without the experience being President...to them it is analogous to picking a 'knownothing' celebrity.

C'mon...surely the TPM crowd gets this?

Exactly. I wouldn't vote for someone simply because of their popularity either. But you know that he is more than that, despite the fact that he is indeed very popular with so many.

The irony is that it is Obama who wants to talk issues and "substance" over the "more experienced" McCain who can't count the fingers in front of his face.

It is demagoguery and just plain cynical.

We are smarter than that and deserve better from our candidates for president.

I am insulted. I would hope that the greatest generation would be too.


I don't know Roadkill. the Greatest Generation reveres McCain's POW status, they were raised to respect tenure and seniority in their jobs and they also grew up segregated...that combination means Obama's 'otherness' can trump his intelligent stature. After all, this is a generation that overwhelmingly picked the white dumb guy over the 'uppity negro'. That is the generation who would not even allow negroes in the trade unions, despite them doing far better work on their crews for years and years. That is the generation who put Jews in college yearbooks on a separate page or perforated the picture so it could be easily removed.
That generation does consider negros 'foreign'. Negros were seen and not heard. That is the generation who would not hire American Negro WWII veterans.
That is the generation who considered Muhammad Ali uppity who considered miscongenation an abomination and who to this day see the America Negro as invisible when they work right in their presence.

It is a huge cultural divide and McCain & GOP is exploiting it to the max....heck they even smeared McCain with this mess when they wanted Bush to win.

Have you noticed how their are no family photos of McCain with his Bangledesh daughter?

This celebrity mess works especially if you consider that 'black celebritys' were nothing but entertainers of that generation..you know 'shucknjivin' stepinfetchit tap dancers and jokesters like Sammy Davis.

Poitier crossed the color line in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner after being just a good Negro in Lillies of the Field.

I really think you are missing it when it comes to that generation and its cultural mores and biases.

Obama gets it, he said his grandmother has said things that made him cringe about black men on the streets.

That is what his entire speech was about in Philadelphia on race.

That is what he meant when he said his grandmother was a typical white person. It was not a derisive comment but a cultural comment that meant she was typical of white people for her generation in terms of their biases and the way they were raised to view other races.

Which why Obama knows precisely what they are saying about him because he heard right at his grandparents kitchen table.

I had such compassion for Obama hearing him mention those anecdotes. I could not imagine how alone he must have felt being the only face of color in his household and hearing people who he KNEW loved him dearly make such hateful remarks about folks who looked just like him.

So, I think Roadkill, that this ad is very very very effective.

So is whitehaired Bill Clinton vehemently denouncing that he is racist!! That same generation identifies with white soladarity when they hear that from Bill with his southern accent.

please.

This stuff is dynamite and the GOP and McCain know it.

user-pic
So, I think Roadkill, that this ad is very very very effective.

Maybe, but only with that "greatest generation" crowd. They are old, like McCain, and getting older. They are also dying off and there are fewer and fewer of them.

I don't have any handy facts to prove it, but I suspect that that is also the base of Bush's 25% approval ratings.

If that is the base of MCCain's support and that is to whom he is appealing with these ads, then old John is in deep trouble. There are just too few of them and too many young people who are not going to be swayed by these ads and won't be voting for the old guy, anyway.

I feel you they are. And their kids are doing an awesome job not carrying on that ugly tradition. I recall a story one of my neighbors was telling his son coming back from the Little League or b-ball game.
He was explaining to his job how they use to not allow blacks in the major league and NBA...his son replied Wow!! that was dumb they're the best players.

The kid was simply incredulous.

America has progressed just by that father telling his son that story and the kid knowing that he has seen some of the best athletes out there who were not white.

I have great hope and am working hard this election.

Yet, I know that ad is effective as much as I wish it wasn't.

They do NOT want some vacuous celebrity in the oval office.

OK. Conceded. Now prove Obama's a "vacuous celebrity".

And consider that they do NOT want somebody fookin around with their Social Security either. There are plenty of AARP folks who are plenty hissed off at Republicans. This ad doesn't do a thing for them.

I'm uncertain now what you're trying to convince us of.

He isn't vacuous and you know that. However, individuals raised in that Generation are racially biased even when the Negro is 10X superior to the non-Negro candidate. They will vote for the dumb white guy every time!!

What the celebrity meme does is emphasis his lack of experience and that is something the WWII generation finds abhorrent. They beleive in waiting your turn and that seniority trumps superiority. McCain has the seniority no matter how smart this young upstart whippersnapper is! And to top it off he is a Negro, too?

Not gonna vote for him.

So, we are very much reliant on their grandchildren and their children...the boomers and boomECHO for Obama to win.

Duh. We get it. We just see it as more Republican projection, and more people see what's wrong with Republicans than think Obama's an emptyheaded "celebrity". Clearly.

Poor McCain, the truuth is that Barack Obama is "The One" we have been waiting for.

McCain is the Washington insider who married well and has been on the shelf too long. His "sell by" date has expired. He is the "the other one".

If that weren't bad enough, the GOP product line is losing value. They are staying with their Neocon division and trying to beef-up the Religious Right, but their small "c" conservative division has been losing numbers. Yep, GOP, Inc. is in a bear market. It will take more than the new CEO, John McCain, to engineer a turnaround.

That's it. Obama is the celebrity because he is celebarted by so mnay, from so many different backgrounds - the real Americans - because he is inclusive.

But McCAin is the INSIDER. The ESTABLISHMENT.

Let them keep wasting their money on these ads. They are only going to harden Obama's hard support. Any soft support they manage to siphon off will quickly return with the convention and debates - when they are reminded that, "oh yeah, there's a reason that he's such a 'celebrity'".

Since Obama is a such the celebrity, TPM should change its name to TMZ.

The official site for entertainment news, celebrity gossip, Washington rumors, celebrity video and photo galleries.

And yet, in spite of all your concern, here you are!

Admit it; you're hooked.

user-pic

This is a very good Obama interview re: energy policy. I hope this is the guy who shows up for the debates. He deftly handled all of the right-wing talking points thrown at him by the teevee talking head. (whom Obama jokingly called, "McCain's proxy")

Excellent video link. thanks

I think being disrespectful of Obama's intellect will come back and bite them on the ass in the debates.

They are effectively lowering expectations of Obama as a lightweight, empty suit. When he is up there on the stage with McCain and is shown to be his equal or better, the facade of these attacks will come tumbling down.

It's a stupid short term strategy. Kind of like their short term idiot strategy in Iraq.

Good luck with pretending that professor Obama is a lightweight, especially when your candidate is an intellectually lazy gaffe-machine.


user-pic

Yah, you got it.

The Repugs are incapable of thinking beyond the next ten minutes.

I really don't think they're human, myself.

Yet, we've endured them for the last 8 years. What does that say about those who are fooled by them so consistently?

user-pic
The "celeb" epithet is all about cheapening the mass political support for Obama and redefining the Obama movement as one that's less about politics and issues and more about cult of personality.

This damn ad does not attack Obama - it attacks US. This is like the other one that Obama pointed out was really attacking us for being enthusiastic about our candidate.

Mocking the voters will work about as well as when Hillary tried it.

I think being respectful of your opponent is at root being respectful of their supporters (so much the better to convince them to jump ship)

user-pic

Word.

I doubt this will be very effective: Obama has generally enjoyed a huge advantage in the "who cares more about you/understands your plight"-type question in all polls.

user-pic
Late Update: The ad will be cycled into the McCain camp's buy in CO, IA, MI, MO, NV, NH, NM, OH, PA, VA (NoVA) and WI.

Why is McLame wasting money in New Hampshire?

Nostalgia for the time when the Granite State was a reliably Republican redoubt.

Paris Hilton responds to original celeb ad.

Neil Armstrong Walks on the Moon.

user-pic

Greg posted that last night and I have to say that my opinon of Paris Hilton went way way up after I saw it.

Mine too! And I loved how she keeps referring to McShame as "Old Dude" and compares him to the Crypt Keeper. Now that's funny!

Aye, mine as well.

user-pic

I think it is a pretty decent ad. If McCain wants to call Obama a celebrity then he can because Obama is, but then again so is McCain.

Unlike McCain, Obama is a celebrity with substance. Notice how John McCain's energy plan is morphing right in front of our eyes?

There is such a thing as going to the well one too many times....

And frankly, I think it just sets Obama up to continue using the John McCain isn't serious bit....

I have a take on these ads I have not heard elsewhere: I think these ads are an attempt to rally evangelical voters by painting Obama as a potential antichrist. I kid not. If you have read the Left Behind books or watched any of the fundie end-times TV or movies (and I taught a college course on apocalypticism in American culture, so I have done all of the above) you'll recall that the antichrist is supposed to be a young charismatic leader who leads millions astray with his charm, eloquence, and grandiose promises. The swooning throngs of Europeans, his strange background, his blackness - and especially the tag line "the biggest celebrity in the world" - are all efforts to conjure these sorts of fears.

Like all good ads of this type, it speaks to those in the know without scaring off those who are not part of the subculture.

oooooooooooooooooo, interesting....very interesting..that's much more disturbing when it comes to 'the other' label.

So, he is like Damien, eh? Y'know in The Omen...666..is that it?

user-pic

You know I've thought the same thing ----- but

so what?

If the person is such a dedicated lunatic that they would buy this -- they ain't voting for him anyway.

Actually, if Barack Obama were the Antichrist, that would mean he is preordained by God to become the leader of the whole world. His ascendency heralds the second coming of Jesus in less than a decade. Since God's will cannot be thwarted, and since the Evangelicals have shown by their continued interest in war between Israel and the Arab world (another supposed harbinger of Apocalypse) that they are all too interested in hastening Christ's return, shouldn't they all vote for Barack, just in case he IS the Antichrist?

I mean, you would think they'd be excited to know that their saviour's return is so close!

Greg - I love you almost as much as Tena X, but I disagree again.

Celebrity is someone SUPERFICIAL, who cares only about HIMSELF, fame, adoration, popularity.

What this new ad is really asking is this: who does Obama care more about - you, the voter, or himself?

Contrast this with "AMERICA FIRST".

Gitlin, who writes here frequently, wrote a whole book about it. I'm a little shocked that Republicans are using the same thing over and over and over and over and we're still acting surprised every time it happens.

the obama campaign should turn this celebrity as a positive. their spinners should be on it right now. thank mccain first for the concession and then twist it. now that mccain admits obama is a celebrity if obama uses it to his benefit then mccain cant take it back later.

user-pic

I am sorry but I totally disagree that this ad is effective.

I still think that it is just STUPID.

This isn't much different from the other ad so I am not sure that people will be tuned into it.

Plus Paris' ad that EVERYBODY will see really counteracts this.

Obama's attack ads right now are FAR BETTER.

user-pic

I get that Lalo, and I suspect Greg does - but that underlying message doesn't make it any more effective than it is on the face of it.

Two words: Ronald Reagan.

Sadly, I disagree.

I'm willing to bet big bucks that we will see a commercial soon about Celebrities Defending America Against Terrorists - "Will the world's biggest celebrity keep America safe?"

And then on foreign policy, celebrity meeting without preconditions.

I'm pretty sure this is effecitve, for two reasons: it dictates the conversation and the headlines and it dares and provokes Democrats to react in a way they always do: hurt, mean-spirited, personal.

Unfortunately, I very much agree with your commentary.

I too believe this is highly effective.

user-pic

O Lalo - just when I thought you were going to be reasonable -

provokes Democrats to react in a way they always do: hurt, mean-spirited, personal.

Dude.

I know you aren't that stupid and I know you know that was projection like a multiplex.

Obama has been acting mean-spirited, personal - hurt? I don't think so. That would be the GOP - and that is always the GOP and you know it, Lalo.

Tena, he did act a little offended already. But I meant "Democrats" which includes the ridiculous Bomb Bomb ad from the DNC.

Celebrities like McHensley and the Hiltons have no problems helping THEIR families--the GOP's campaign to eliminate the inheritance tax has seen to that.

Other people's families? Not so much.

McCain is just jealous. Acounter ad like this is appropriate:

OPENING VISUAL: Select footage from McCain's ad on "Celeb" and "The One"
VOICEOVER: Ever wonder why instead of telling the American people how he would govern the country if elected President, Senator McCain chose to attack Senator Obama's popularity with the electorate? Us too....Until it became clear.

FADE OLD AND SWITCH NEW VISUAL: Senator McCain's speech showing Green Background
VOICEOVER: Senator McCain could not attract the people to listen to what he has to say.

FADE OLD AND SWITCH NEW VISUAL: President Bush arriving from a trip and waiving to two men who would not give him the time of day (I saw this from Countdown at MSNBC). Show also footage of President Bush embracing Senator McCain. In the screen, show the policies of President Bush that Senator McCain has adopted.
VOICEOVER: But who can blame them? Who would want to listen to the same old policies that have failed the American people.

FADE OLD AND SWITCH NEW VISUAL: Senator OBama's speach in Oregon as well as in Berlin showing thousands of enthusiastic people. In the screen, show the policies of Senator Obama that differ from President Bush and Senator McCain.
VOICEOVER: Senator McCain, jealous much? Enough with the childish and silly ads. Be responsible enough and explain to the electorate why continuing President Bush's policies would be good for the country. Instead of obsessing about Senator Obama and asking if he can lead, why dont you show if you can.

I usually despise "here's my ad" posts, but I must admit this is a good script. Nicely done.

user-pic

Greg,

Why don't you highlight Obama's "no original maverick" ad instead of McCain's LAME re-do celebrity ad?

The celebrity stuff is getting old now!

Because highlighting Obama's ad will generate only half the posts that McCain's ad will.
Highlighting McCain's ad brings out the concern trolls and the PUMAS too.

Always with the name-calling, Bucky?

It's kind of cute seeing you call somebody a troll - it's like seeing Bill O'Reilly call somebody Rovian. But it's cultists like you who leave such a bad taste for your Dear Leader.

I'm not a PUMA - I'll vote for The Dear Leader, and vomit afterwards. But I [i]can[/i] be persuaded otherwise. Not by the repugs, I could never go that way. Rather, I can be persuaded by your kind of slime. And I'm not the only one, either. So if you really want Him to lose the election, just keep right on with the mindless, name-calling garbage.

I just don't think it will have much of an effect. It has that "tell me once, it's funny, tell me twice,the conclusion becomes what's so funny about that".
You can read many things into the end result. What stands out to me is McSame is just plain, overwhelmingly jealous!

I watched the new McCain ad with the sound off (boss thinks I'm working).

Without the smarmy voice over or the old white haired dude's droning voice, what you see is a smiling Obama being greeted by many, many excited fans. The old white haired dude is not pictured with many people around him and people do not seem to be real excited.

We live in the American Idol/TMZ world (a disease of the 21st century?) and the general population equates popularity with success. Per McCain's ad, Obama is successful.

And Paris, you SHOULD show up at the debates.

Ready to help your family? Sure thing, gramps. Even your family. The first one and the second one!

The Obama campaign should paint McSame as an old buffoon. Very easy to do. Simply use the footage from the movie "Back to School" with Rodney Dangerfield doing the triple lindy. Superimpose McLame's face over Rodney's as he does the dive, and everytime he flips, stop the frame and highlight any one of the Straight Talk Expresse's flip flops.

OH, I do like this as it targets the right demographic. Now, what is the music in the background. I think music is key.
We need to find one of the most popular tunes of that generation and use it to capture their attention.
Just like they due to the baby boomers now. Folks stop when they hear their favorite tunes from that era and look up to listen to the TV.

Music is very key.
Now what is the music for your Ad?

I think Obama needs some ballroom dancing ads too for that generation..along with the foxtrot.

Music first.

user-pic

How about a Moveon.org type organization with this ad?

(Montage of photos of Bono, Bill Gates, Angelina Jolie in Africa, etc.) No photo of Obama.

Voice over:

"In a time when people are hungry for change from the failed policies of the past. There are people who gain celebrity status for trying find solutions."

(Montage of McCain with Bush in every second photo, combined with montage of McCain in a movie in every second photo.)

Voice over:

"And then there are the wannabees and hangers on."

I would pick the music from the circus that you hear when 22 clowns get out of the car ....

hahahahahahaaha!!! The geezers would identify with that for sure...hahaha

MerryGoRound music would work as well as that doink doink noise the Three Stooges always had.

Maybe that is a good parody...BushCheneyand McCain as LarryMoe and Curly Joe?

lol lol

user-pic

It becomes obvious why they are pushing the "Obama is a celebrity" thing so hard; it's to cheapen him, yes, but FURTHER, look at the Pew Poll stuff about Obama fatigue;

Who "hears too much" about a PRESIDENTIAL candidate fer Christ's sake?

On the other hand, who hears too much about Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Heath Ledger, Brangelina?

McCain's branding is working IF Pew's polling sample isn't skewed.

Marshall's tea leaves on this issue.

This isn't going to play well twice in a row, like McCain doesn't have any other ammo to use, he is down to lies and celebity ranting. NO Dana Milbank to twist the context.

If McCain was going to have any chance at all, it was to separate himself from Bush but McCain can’t do that without separating himself from the money. the money tied in with big oil and everything else under no-bid contract heaven.

It is all going to be down hill from here, and November is long way off. Even MoDo is hammering on McCain too for his Juvie ads. It's all in the crapper.

I guess McCain's ad consultants couldn't come up with anything new, so they just decided to recycle the same half-assed joke. And that's a good metaphor for his policy positions, isn't it?

user-pic

Why do you guys help McCain's people do their job?

Stop spreading it, and focus on more important stories.

user-pic

Why is TPM putting McCain ads at the top of the forum?

Why are you guys promoting McCain stuff?

Let's stick with ATTACKING McCain rather than promoting McCain's attacks.

[T]he Obama movement ... [is] less about politics and issues and more about cult of personality.

Yep.

I've been saying that since before His cult members stooped to calling Hilary a bitch/cunt. Never stopped saying it, in fact. Too bad it's taking McBush to finally get people to notice.

user-pic

Please go back to Red State.

Please go back to Red State.

New flash, caseynm. It's not only repugs that despise your Dear Leader. Nor is it only racists who despise him. Intelligent people, yes. Grown-ups, yes.

Now - Please go back to class. The hall monitor is starting to get suspicious.

"Is a celebrity going to help your family?"

Maybe Obama should start making counter-commercials with footage of, oh, Brad Pitt wading waist deep in post-Katrina flood waters to help rescue the people the government left hanging. That's just the first example that comes to mind, but I'm sure there are more. So, yeah, celebrities can be willing, ready, and able to help American families.

But I think the very first comment, from das2003, is wonderfully on-point: who really IS the bigger celebrity here?

McCain is the bigger celebrity, and its all he has. And in response to who would help your family, just what has McCain ever done for American families?

He's done plenty for big oil companies.

Has McCain hosted SNL more than Paris Hilton? Has he appeared on Letterman or Leno more than Paris Hilton? How about the Daily Show?

Wrinkly white haired guys who live in glass houses better not throw stones.

Response ad writes itself:

Does John McCain help your family?

Under the Democrats, 21 million new private sector jobs. Under Bush--McCain policies, job growth down 84 percent. And your wages are worth less.

Bush tax cuts for heiresses subsidize Paris Hilton -- McCain voted for no taxes at all on inheritances and dividends -- and you pay for it.

Cue John McCain ad saying we're worse off than four years ago.

Wonder why? Vote Obama.

There. Took

less than five minutes, and it's better/tougher than Burton's whine fest. Why are Dem operatives always so scripted-whiny when under attack? It reads like the biggest wimp in your middle school is talking, hiding behind the teacher instead of knockingthe bully on his butt, and makes people want to kick dirt in his face.

Bill. the teacher isn't coming to save you dude. You are the change you seek. Act like it.

When is McCain going to do a commercial and call him a
----------------------CUNT---------------------

oh wait those are terms of endearment McCain uses
for his wife I suppose after he puts her in nude
"beauty" contest.

Celebrity == Zip Coon.

It's also part and parcel of the Republican strategy of projection: Obama is racist, elitist; a celebrity; Obama has no energy plan -- when it's really McCain who has those problems and more.

We posted ringtone-ready audio from the ad over at Entertonement.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address