New McCain Ad: "Maybe The Applause Has Gone To His Head"
The McCain campaign outdoes itself, releasing two "celeb" sneer ads in one day, the latest being this new spot that's going up in Ohio.
It offers a creative new twist on the "celeb" theme, with a narrator opining that "maybe the applause has gone to his head"...
McCain's ad is a response to the Obama campaign's criticism of the DHL merger, which FactCheck.org says is misleading.
Separately, it's sobering to think that the "celeb" sneer, with those shots of crowds chanting Obama's name as he supposedly basks in his own adulation, could conceivably appear in just about every single McCain attack ad between now and election day.
The McCain camp clearly thinks this slow-burn defining of Obama is working. Either that, or maybe all the applause for Obama has gotten to McCain's head...















comments were temporarily disabled. apologies
August 15, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why doesn't Steve Schmidt just call him an uppity nigger and be done with it?
August 15, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
True dat!
August 15, 2008 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Mark of Rove is never applied frontally.
August 15, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup - you need to know your enemy before you can defeat his fat pudgy ass. McCain needs to be asked questions in regards to his campaign not only employing rovian tactics but rovian protegees.
August 15, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, they should just come out and say it. Though I think this ad will have no effect.
Many of McCain's ads open with the same thing, Obama in berlin. People are probably already going to think they saw the ad before and thus pay no attention to the ad.
Obama staffer has already went through this ad to debunk it.
Hundreds Show Up 2 the PUMA Conference - Pictures
August 15, 2008 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Note there are two major themes: the taxes bit, and the "empty suit" bit. The McCain campaign has been repeating this ALL summer to define Barack Obama their way.
I wonder why Obama's campaign dropped their repetition of "McCain : Bush Third Term" attacks in their press releases, videos, and so on this summer. That narrative has been lost for now.
August 15, 2008 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder why Obama's campaign dropped their repetition of "McCain : Bush Third Term" attacks...
I dunno, but I personally don't think they were having a huge effect on anyone except for already-decided Obama voters.
August 15, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
i don't get why obama doesn't push back on the taxes BULLSHIT. it's so annoying..
August 15, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
When McSame's ads talk about taxing savings, they're referring to capital gains.
Obama's people need to push back on this.
There are no capital gains taxes in retirement accounts. The money is taxed at normal rate upon withdrawl, ie after you're retired, when your income is lower.
August 16, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dunno ...
I think there are plenty of "McCain = Bush III" ads, press releases, etc. to go around. And a Presidential candidate also has not only to convince the voters that the current majority party (the party that controls the White House) is underserving of retaining majority status but that his/her party is capable of being the majority party, too.
"McCain = Bush III" is simply not enough -- even in a year like this one. Otherwise, Democrats would have been willing to nominate someone like Chris Dodd, John Kerry, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson, etc. -- all great Democrats.
August 16, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
"...maybe all the applause for Obama has gotten to McCain's head..."
I think you hit the nail on the head there, Greg.
August 15, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Prophylaxis for August 25 and 60,000 screaming Democrats
August 15, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
200,000 Germans came out to hear a stump speech and 60,000 is the best we can do for an acceptance speech? Why is that?
August 15, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was 75,000? And it's cause they don't have a place big enough for all the people who want to see Obama. I'm sure if they had a stadium that sat 200,000 people, those tickets would still be sold out on day one. ;)
August 15, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
15 people came out to hear McCain's green background speech in Louisiana. And he can only get 8 people to attend the convention. Why's that? What's wrong with him?
August 15, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
repuglitards have problems getting past the bathroom in the airport in Minneapolis
August 16, 2008 5:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
May be the germans (and other europeans) are smart to recognize a capable world leader and some americans, like our billy boy here, are too stupid and vote against their own good ?
August 16, 2008 3:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because that's what the stadium holds, dumb a$$! And it's 75,000 -- not 60,000.
August 16, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
At least McCain is finally on the defensive. This is a targeted Ohio issue, so I'm sure Ohioans will know the ins and outs from local reporting. The facts, whichever way they are, will speak for themselves.
McCain running to factcheck.org for a defense after running blatantly false ads is comical.
August 15, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great observation!
It is very interesting that they consult factcheck.org for this claim, yet something like "...Obama will raise taxes on everyone making $42,000..." seems to not warrant the same scrutiny. Nonetheless, it's great to have the McCain camp on the ropes! Obama needs to strike again hard...Taxes would be a good avenue to travel...use fact check stats to prove that his tax plan provides much more support...A McCain couldn't care less about the middle class narrative would be a good one I think.
August 15, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Factchuck were nit-picking idiots in 2004, and they're nit-picking idiots now. If an ad called Obama an uppity n-word, it would demur.
August 15, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought I read something the other day that factcheck.org was affiliated with some wealthy Republican behind the scenes. Does anyone know?
August 15, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, excellent observation. Thanks for the encouraging point.
In their ad, Tax Man is the defensive response. But the ad also reinforces their celebrity and not ready to lead angles of attack. Branding by repetition.
See below for some musing some labels for McSame.
August 15, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems to me Obama had one message "change" and he stopped delivering it. If he has a message now, I couldn't tell you what it is and I'm a news junkie.
I got a call from the Obama campaign yesterday and the guy tells me Obama is for compromise.
Change agents don't begin by compromising. The change message needs to be strong, simple and clear. The compromise if it comes, comes later.
August 15, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
You should buy a gun, write FISA on the side of it, then shoot yourself in the foot.
August 15, 2008 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
The guy was really from the Obama campaign? He really said Obama is for compromise? Please tell me that's not part of the official script and that caller was just being dumb in his phrasing.
August 15, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, in fact I said to him - listen to what you just said - can you imagine a Republican calling me on the phone and telling me he was for compromise? The mind boggles.
I guess we're caving on the right to choose today. Centrism is such a spineless way to lose.
August 15, 2008 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
This sounds like the cosumate McCain: The under-achiever who is obviously trying to stir resentment among people who have fallen on hard times. "How dare they cheer for HIM!"
August 15, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Didn't the McCain folks have a hissy when Obama said that McCain was "losing his bearings." Didn't they claim Obama was attacking McLooney's age? But they feel free to push this?
When is the slap down gonna happen? I want it. Bad.
August 15, 2008 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Obama draws a little blood ... finally. Now, will they hammer McCain for thinking that Georgia is the first international crisis since the end of the Cold War?
August 15, 2008 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt they will. To me, the issue seems to be that the Dem surrogates are not a well-oiled talking point machine.
August 15, 2008 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a tough one while the conflict is still fresh and the MSM is eating up all the "Cold War" crap. McCain would twist just about anything and say Obama was trying to minimize the suffering of Georgians, sabotaging the spread of democracy, taking the side of Russia, showing his inexperience in estimating the gravity of foreign policy crises, etc. And the MSM would not weigh in any sort of reasonable fashion.
He's probably doing the best thing right now, at least while passions are high about the issue. He's avoiding stark contrast and bombast, maintaining a sober and measured demeanor and neutralizing the issue as much as possible politically. I just don't think there's any way for him to jump in front of the issue until things calm down and diplomacy accomplishes a sustainable cease-fire agreement. Then maybe he can suggest that McCain's rhetoric, if heeded, might have exacerbated the situation.
August 16, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama must have drawn blood for the McCain campaign to respond to that DHL ad.
August 15, 2008 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just keep micro-targeting and hammering away at "Country First" by pushing McCain as his own political career first... That was the McCain's original push with energy, but it did not take-- Obama as Dr. No..
August 15, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
The sad part, Greg, is that this probably is working.
I'm not impressed with Obama's campaign right now. Look people, negative ads work, and we can't simply dismiss there effectiveness because we think they are stupid. Four years ago, I thought no one would actually believe the swift boat ads, but sure enough . . .
The thing about McCain's campaign is that he is completely coopting Obama's message, but it isn't apparent that Obama's campaign thinks this is a serious problem. What's going on is McCain is saying he's for something--renewable energy, taking on big oil, job creation--and then Obama is saying that McCain isn't really for that thing, but Obama is!
There is absolutely no message or narrative clarity here, and that works in John McCain's favor. As long as people are able to think that McCain couldn't possibly be that bad, he's got a fighting chance.
August 15, 2008 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, they just seem to be tut-tutting the McCain camp for being negative, for engaging in the same old politics. That's the kind of approach you take when you're ahead by 20 points in the polls, like if you're running against Alan freakin' Keyes. Not when you're essentially tied nationally.
Yeah, I know that this will be decided state-by-state and not nationally, but I'm seeing Obama's lead here in Colorado fade before my eyes, and it never had to be like that. McCain is (or at least used to be) pretty unpopular here, but he's gaining ground and consolidating his support nonetheless. And no, I don't believe any more that the convention will magically cure this problem.
I'm not saying I expect Obama to crush McCain by 20, but really, it shouldn't be this close.
August 15, 2008 7:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Early days, my friend. The real hard work starts in September when the majority of folks actually start paying attention to the campaign. The real general election campaign will start after the convention and in the early part of September and will build from that point.
McCain is simply spending down his on-hand primary money since he'll be going to federal financing after the GOP convention.
August 15, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if this fake general election is any indication of Obama's campaign strategy, color me worried.
August 16, 2008 2:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cube, dude, the swift boat ads were running at in June, July, and August 4 years ago. The point of running ads right now is that people aren't really paying attention. Because they aren't really paying attention, you can get your message out, create a frame for the campaign, and create a narrative about your opponent without having to worry about being held accountable for what you actually say. People are going to see these ads, and they will remember the conclusion but forget how they got to that conclusion.
Why is Kerry a flipflopper? Well, the ad showed him windsurfing back and forth.
Why is Kerry a liar? Somebody on TV said he was lying about Vietnam. Who said it? I dunno, but I can't trust him.
THAT is how these things work.
August 16, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
But herein lies the nub: "People are going to see these ads, and they will remember the conclusion but forget how they got to that conclusion."
While I agree, I have to ask: what is the conclusion they will remember?
Labeling John Kerry as an elitist, aloof, flip-flopping Frenchman was a pretty effective smear. Labeling Barack Obama as the "biggest celebrity in the world" accomplishes...what?
August 16, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should have never allowed the McCain camp to frame the excitement around his campaign as a negative.
McCain came out hard every time Obama tried something that they were in fear it could stick. Obama lets McCain define him and says "What me worry?
Maybe Axelrod and Co just don't believe it is particularly effective. Both must be polling different groups.
August 15, 2008 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't be surprised if both camps find it hasn't been particularly effective, rather only marginally effective. But as Greg points out, this could be a slow-burn tactic. If they keep pounding and pounding away at it, then it will become more and more effective.
If McCain keeps up with this line of attack a few weeks after the convention, then I think we can assume that it is working. Until then, he will keep hammering away at this since it is his only counter to the 70k people cheering for Obama at the convention.
I expect (hope) at the convention Obama will have some well timed mocking of McCain's celeb smear.
August 15, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama Campaign's message - "Barack Obama: Not George W. Bush"
August 15, 2008 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The Obama Campaign's message - "Barack Obama: Not George W. Bush""
Which is fairly modest compared to "Ace" McCain. Think of all the people he's run as not being:
"In the primaries, he campaigned on "I'm not that robotic businessman, I'm not that sanctimonious hick, I'm not that crazy libertarian, I'm not that washed-up actor, I'm not that delusional 9/11 guy." In the general election, he's emphasized that he's not that treasonous dreamer.""
August 16, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
This whole celebrity thing is nonsense. Celebrity is not something manufactured, it is something that is bestowed. The crowd in Berlin was not solicited by Barack Obama, it was a spontaneous outpouring of respect and of Hope that he can change the World. McCain couldn't attract a roach--unless Cindy gives out free beer.
The whole celebrity thing is ludicrous. McCain is repulsive.
August 15, 2008 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Albert Einstein and Mother Theresa were celebrities. The reason this strategy is not being very effective is that everyone agrees that Obama is a celebrity, the issue is whether he is a vacuous celebrity, and this issue is where McCain is failing to convince anyone beyond his own supporters.
August 15, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Republicans have been winning elections by selling status resentment since Dick Nixon was honing his political skills in Ike's races against Adlai Stevenson.
The McCain campaigning is counting on this sort of thing still working. The core message here is "who is Barack Obama to think he's better than you?" And, of course, in the case of this year's election, there's an added rational dimension to this decades-old message (as noted above: "Barack Obama is an uppity n*****r.")
Will this work again this year? I honestly don't know. But our politics will be infinitely healthier when this brand of GOP pseudo-populism stops selling.
August 15, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
WHY is the Obama campaign unable to re-frame this whole celebrity sneer? It seems to me (not being an ad person or knowing the first thing about it) like it would be fairly easy to turn this around -- e.g. with ads about McCain's inability to draw a crowd, his general lack of energy, and his sneering sour grapes attitude toward Obama's success in getting people motivated. How is it that the Obama campaign can't associate these assets precisely with leadership ability? To lead you must motivate: Obama motives. Hurrah! Now here's McCain: tepid clapping, the sound of crickets. As things are going, McCain & Co. are successfully conditioning the public to viscerally respond to Obama's crowds as somehow bad things, to the point where they're becoming real liabilities. Look at Pollster.com's national average. That's a crash and burn trajectory if I ever saw one. Obama drawing Forty-four percent in the latest Gallup tracking poll? Come on!
August 15, 2008 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. It's like the Obama campaign is afraid of capitalizing on their real strength. It would be a simple judo maneuver to turn this aspect that McCain is trying to characterize as a weakness and turn it into a big positive.
The country wants change! Obama is ready to give it to them! Why not be proud of being ahead of the curve for once?
August 15, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely! It has to be gotten out there, if not explicitly then subliminally, that McCain's obsession with Obama's "celebrity" is in fact nothing more than an uninspired and uninspiring man's resentment of a better man's exuberance and LEADERSHIP.
Someone explain to me -- does anyone know? -- why the Obama people are not flipping McCain's crap back into his lap. It has to be done "artfully", of course, but it has to be done -- now! Why the passivity? I just don't get it.
August 15, 2008 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
enough with this chicken little bullshit!!! you're giving me a headache.
he was up like 6 points two days ago...that tracking poll ebbs and flows. enough with the sky is falling crap.
does obama need to hit back on "celebrity?" sure...i think it would help. does he need to hit bakc on taxes?? yea ...but obviously they know somehting you don't and i don't. there's no solid evidence that he's doing poorly. he's winning in almost every poll.
stop eating the msm chicken shit about how obama should be ahead like 20 points!!! he's a black man in america running fro mpresident!!! did you think this was going to be easy??
August 15, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh right. Everything's coming up roses. The polls ebb and flow. The only poll that matters is the poll on election day. Why, Obama was ahead two days ago, a week ago, two weeks ago; so naturally he'll be ahead again tomorrow. Besides, he's ahead in EVERY poll, EVERYWHERE, EVERY day. Even when it looks like he's behind, he really ahead.
Wonderfully sage advice from an ostrich named Polly Thank you, Polly.
Did I think it was going to be easy? Of course not. That's the whole point of my post. Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, Obama's showing against a septugenerian, gaff-a-day, war-mongering CREEP in what should be an overwhelmingly Democratic year is, to say the least, SLUGGISH. In battle ground states, he is significantly trailing Democratic senatorial candidates, and is in effect hoping to ride their coattails to victory. At this point, we're talking up-ticket, not down-ticket politics.
Why is that? Well, of course, Obama's a black man. What else? He's a black man on the verge of being run over by well-oiled attack machine that hasn't even been fully reved up yet. Obama WILL lose this election if his campaign doesn't start responding in kind. Here's an example of what I mean:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Oot9IbQxrI
Politics is bare-knuckles boxing, not pattycake. You can indulge in magical thinking and hope for the best, or you can fight. I say fight, damn it! Enough "John McCain is an American hero" crap. He's a conniving fraud of low intelligence and dubious morals whose asinine self-conceits would make him an unmitigated disaster in the White House. How's that for starters?
August 16, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, will McCain ever have a positive ad about issues........this is beyond nuts.
August 15, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just curious - do Obama ads get this much free advertising and circulation on pro-McCain sites?
August 15, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, because Obama hasn't hit back with anything other than a "~Oh~come~on~now~that's~not~true...~" If he and his campaign decide to wake up and start fighting, maybe he'll be relevant again.
Like MJ says, this campaign needs to be a full and detailed indictment of Republicans, Conservatives, Bush, and John McCain -- the #1 enabler of W's decimation of America.
August 15, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Regarding this whole stupid "Celeb" thing...
Hasn't Washington DC been dubbed "Hollywood for ugly people" for years?
August 15, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lawd, sometimes I think I'm watching a movie... that the most powerful country in the world can have such a stupid, senile, egocentric, idiotic, yellow-teethed candidate running for POTUS.... McCheese is GREEN with envy. That for the first time in a long time, someone is outshining them.... ohhh heavens! This ad will only work on half dead, stupid idiots!
August 15, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
You haven't been paying attention to the polling, have you? Right now it's all down, down, down. McCain is tied nationally. N. Carolina is virtually out of reach. Colorado is slipping away. McCain leads in Virginia. The lead in Minnesota has been frittered away to 2 or 3 points. Etc., etc. McCain & Co. now have 60 million bucks they need to spend in the next three weeks. That's enough dough to brand every brain in America with whatever smear image of Obama they want to use. Believe me, at this rate, it will be indelible by election day.
August 15, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Deep breath. Seriously. These comment threads are starting to make the cable news folks seem reasonable and equanimous.
August 16, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
And you call yourself Blue Skies :-)
August 16, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Blue Skies reminds me of one of those old auntie types who find that listing every negative possibility and worrying about every little thing to be just, well, delicious.
August 16, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed.... It's one thing to be called a celeb, but when it starts working????? Obama has to start responding. As idiotic and juvenile as these ads are, the critical mass is stupid. Sorry! They should NOT let Obama get defined as an empty celeb suit. How long has mcIdiot been a celeb anyways? He's just jealous someone else is now more popular, taller (short man syndrome) and better looking....
August 15, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I keep wondering why they keep to this celeb notion when there is very little evidence that it's getting McCain much mileage in attracting new voters to his side.
One possibility is that they are terribly afraid of his acceptance speech. No matter what else the MSM has done during this race, it will be hard for them not to gush over the first African American to be nominated for a major political party. Even if Obama wasn't great at giving speeches.
August 15, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reece,
McCain has said what he is FOR in any of his ads. The vast majority of his ads are attack ads on Obama but no real ads on what McCain will do.
August 15, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I meant that McCain hasn't said what he is FOR in any of his ads. It is just negative ads against Obama.
August 15, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain camp clearly thinks this slow-burn defining of Obama is working. Either that, or maybe all the applause for Obama has gotten to McCain's head...
--------------------------------------------------
3) It's the only thing they've got, and it's not much.
~
August 15, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS is what Obama should be running. And they should hire the guy who did it too.
August 15, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesse - agreed, that ad kicks ass. It should be running weekly, coast to coast, during every top 10 (or 20 or whatever) show, from now until the election.
Someone needs to make sure the Obama campaign sees it. Maybe like the head honchos here at TPM? C'mon guys, you definitely have better access than us commenter schlubs....
August 15, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
w00t, he posted it!! I'll just tell myself that he must have found it from me, unless he issues an official denial. :P
But really, I'm so excited to see this get raised to more visibility. I think it's a great model for the Obama campaign.
Btw, I think the "how can he fix the economy if he doesn't think it's broken" ad was really powerful as well.
August 15, 2008 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn. Now *that's* a good ad.
August 15, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the "Celebrity" ads could have an possible effect is rallying the GOP base. McCain maybe found something to attract the conservatives who weren't too keen to support him. The "higher taxes" boogieman has always been a point of consensus for conservatives, even if the claim is not true. Along to the "shallow celebrity" image (just like the "flip-flop elitist" for Kerry), the republican base is starting to come home. They never supposed to vote for Obama, but they needed a reason to support McCain, not just because is an war hero.
If there's a better moment for the polls start to tighten up is now and not in October. Maybe McCain is making inroads, but not enough to cripple Obama for the general election. Also, McCain still lacks the ground game operation that Obama is setting in place.
The campaign' strategy has been good, but I agree that they should response faster, better and stronger. Maybe they knew this was coming and they're adapting to the situation. The real campaign begins with the VP selection and the conventions. Let's just wait and see.
August 15, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing that the McCain campaign is running on is "celebrity" and "higher taxes". Obama is running on tying McCain to Bush and change for a better economy.
I actually think that "celebrity" does LESS damage to Obama than if they ran on "you can't trust Obama because he says he says he was going to do something and doesn't do it ie FISA". I think the LATTER is much more damaging.
"Celebrity" will only go so far because with 3 debates coming up, it will be obvious to everyone that Obama is not an empty headed celebrity but he is intelligent, confident, and informed.
The debates are going to be the MOST important thing that the candidates do and it CAN turn the election either way.
Luckily for Obama the first debate is on the economy and both candidates will be sitting which I found that Obama is the most comfortable in that setting.
August 15, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The moderate repubs and independents are key to this race and during debate McCain can't sputter "Hilton...celebrity...Berlin" and expect to win.
August 15, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree and disagree. FISA resonates with hardcore liberals, but for the general election, the far more more effective attack for McCain to employ involves labeling Obama (to steal JTHB's phrase) as a "CryptoIslamoTerrorist." There's a reason those creepy emails accusing Obama of being a Muslim won't go away. They work!
The "celebrity" theme is totally at odds with this smear. Americans might not always like celebrities, but we are extremely comfortable and familiar with celebrities. They constitute the ultimate known quantity. They sell our products, fill our gossip magazines, win our sports titles, and make our movies. Celebrities are as American as apple pie.
Building Obama up to be the Tiger Woods of politics is a dangerous game indeed for McCain. If the average American truly believes Obama is "the biggest celebrity in the world," it will be very difficult to persuade them that Obama is also an outsider, an other, or a "CryptoIslamoTerrorist."
I hate to break this to the McCain campaign, but showing Tiger Woods surrounded by screaming fans won't make Americans hate Tiger Woods. It will make them think Tiger is the ultimate American archetype: the winner. And Americans love their winners, even if they are of mixed black/Asian heritage playing the lily white sport of corporate executives and country club winners.
Keep it up, McCain. You are making Barack Obama safer and more acceptable every day.
August 16, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCAIN '08: "Maybe the apple-sauce has gone to his head."
August 15, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Article that could be used for rebuttal:
http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-aides-say-he-would-lower-taxes/83970/?print=8900088121
Doing my part!
August 15, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's all about this quote:
"A senior policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation, Rea Hederman Jr., praised Mr. Obama for proposing a 20% tax rate on dividends and capital gains, lower than a 28% rate he had initially floated, though still more than the current 15% rate. "That's a great step in the right direction," Mr. Hederman said. "It's a big change from what we thought the Obama tax plan would be at the beginning of the summer."
Mr. Hederman said the middle class would likely pay less under Mr. Obama's plan than Mr. McCain's..."
August 15, 2008 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no idea why the Obama campaign has not done an ad that shows tht under Obama's plan that the middle class will pay LESS taxes than under McCain's plan.
It would be a very easy ad to do and at the end Obama can say "putting the middle class first".
August 15, 2008 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep.
I really think Obama needs to pick one angle from which to hit McSame and throw those punches over and over.
Not to say other attacks should be omitted, but McCranky is busy branding Obama, and BigO needs to reciprocate. Responding to the dust-up du jour is fine, but a consistent, repeated labelling of the old dottard should at least be a continuous background.
What label? With little thought I had previously picked joke. That might work, but other possibilities include irresponsible, out of touch, and confused. There are others, too.
What's your favorite?
August 15, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
More possibilities:
• Liar
• Reckless
• Cranky
• Senile
• Corporate Greed
I think it's too late for Flip Flopper to work very well. Lobbyist Shill seems a bit to general; it doesn't necessarily imply evil.
I'm sure better imaginations than mine could do better.
August 15, 2008 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the key concept should be "weak." Not that word, explicitly stated. But it seems like the right frame to hang everything on. He's weak and frail, physically. He's losing it mentally. He completely surrendered to Bush - look at that pathetic hug picture. He doesn't even seem in control of his own campaign. Remember "Mccain wasn't speaking for the campaign?" And above all, his whole campaign message is a big whine - that Obama is totally dominating him. In other words, he's a loser asking for special treatment.
August 15, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh yeah, and morally weak too, if that wasn't implied.
August 15, 2008 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The historical record of the Obama Presidential run is going to look very different from the current national press/blog narrative. Obama is like a world class athlete that realizes the secret to winning is to know when to peak and that the rest of the time you work towards that peak.
Obama's primary campaign peaked in February - when he truly won the nomination. By the second week of March, while people were pretending Hillary was still in the race, Obama was playing rope a dope, putting out fires, and not doing anything to tarnish his own brand. Remember how folks wanted him to go scorch earth versus Hillary? How'd that work out?
Obama is hammering McCain at the grass roots level, keeping clean on the national stage, and doing damage control during the "swift boat month." Meanwhile, McCain is playing it for the national press while doing crap at the grass roots level.
My guess is that Obama knows through crazy kung-fu polling exactly what states are truly in play in November and is getting positioned for the post-convention race. I think it works best to think of this month and compare it to last December, when the Hillary team was on the national stage trying to say Obama was a madrasa attending muslim while Obama was racking up voters in Iowa.
August 15, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree. This is not 100 meters, this is a marathon.
August 15, 2008 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Ohio DHL ad clearly touched a nerve in the McCain campaign. But the McCain 'celebrity' theme is seriously beyond lame at this point.
August 15, 2008 9:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still think Obama lost his rhythym when he started 'triangulating' by caving on telecom immunity and bashing moveon.org for the Patreus add 10 months later.
The brilliant thing that McCain's goons have done is set Obama up for huge criticism when he has his Denver stadium acceptance speech - they are advance framing it as a catastrophe no matter how good it is. It will be an event worthy of a celebrity...
The corporate media complex will be echoing the 'celebrity' angle when they critique that speech.
I agree that Obama has to stop responding to McCain's inferiority complex and go on the attack. It would also be nice if Obama started being a bit more progressive on the campaign stump and in his voting record as well...
- BrianInMKE
August 15, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You nailed it. The mcCain camp has cleverly decapitated Obama's acceptance speech. Holding it at Invecso Field is huge mistake, one which I bet they wish they could do over. It will be a spectacle,like a rock concert. WTF was Obama thinking?
August 15, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he was thinking he shouldn't hobble his entire campaign by buckling under the "pressure" of a few stupid and desperate Republican attack ads, the lasting efficacy of which has in no way been demonstrated. And maybe he suspects the ridicule of 75,000 American citizens will be a dicier proposition for the McCain campaign and the MSM than the ridicule of 200,000 Germans. And maybe he realizes that his entire speech at the convention will be broadcast in prime-time over network television and the substance and power of that speech will be the most effective rebuttal to the association McCain is trying to draw between Obama's crowds and his supposed vacuousness. Maybe he also realizes that the MSM, for all their idiocy, will be invested in the drama of Obama's acceptance speech as "historic." Just a few ideas.
August 16, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Specially if McCain speech will have to wait for the NFL game to end, around 11 pm.
August 16, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
So? This obsessing over McCain ads indicates something fundamental about we Democrats (I think that's you too, Greg, although with posts like these it's hard to tell): we're afraid of Republicans! I say: who gives a rat's ass what the latest McCain ad says? Can we please go back on the offensive and stop biting our nails and fingering our worry beads every time McMaverick releases an ad? The celebrity theme is stupid and contemptuous of voters. That's all we need to say about it. And we need to say it over and over. Earnestly pondering its value to Republicans paradoxically creates that value to Republicans. Wake up, all ye newbies!
August 15, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
chris, dual citizenship is legal in the united states but not for anyone who wants to be president of the US. you folks need to stop discounting this poster concerns as this is really an issue that is growing. obama has NOT answered these questions and when you say he has you are being dishonest.
August 15, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're correct! Just one of many October surprises coming from my friendly Republican party.
There are more though! Lots and lots of surprises!
Just have to make sure Hillary is out of it first as she WOULD be hard to beat. Obama.....not so much.
:)
August 15, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're obsessive and you're wrong. Sorry, troll.
August 15, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ariana Huffington is right. Forget the celebrity crap. Show clip after clip of slip after slip to show that McCain is a dunce regarding foreign affairs and security.
We have to attack him on his perceived strength, which is completely bogus. There are hundreds of clips of him making stupid, uninformed comments, and others with Obama looking presidential as he met with world leaders.
It is ridiculous to let McCain take away the positives of that trip -- all they have to do is show the clips of McCain looking like a dope and Obama looking like a thoughtful leader, and then acknowledge that McCain is jealous.
Bottom line: Do you want a leader who has the respect of the world, or one who willingly stays in the shadow of the President who has cost us lives, treasure and stature in the world?
August 16, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who uses the phrase "chicken little" to deflect concerns about Obama's campaign strategy identifies himself as a McROVE STOOGE.
"Chicken Little" is what they say to avoid talking about global warming too.
August 16, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Coming in Sept. th Obama "foreign policy" ad:
Footage of GWB quote about nations not invading other nations in the 21st century, McCain quot on nations not invading other nations in th 21st century. Bullying and bellicose Georgia statements,
Text imposition: GWB and John McCain, the same "go it alone, unilateral approach to dealing with the rest of the world.
Shots of the protests when GWB visited Germany, including burning US flags.
Text imposition: It's not about celebrity, its about restoring respect for the America we can be again.
Same Berlin speech footage, close-ups of waving US flags.
That's what the Berlin footage was for, not July polls.
August 16, 2008 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The DHL ad is what touches the tender spot. Watch their reaction. Just pound the populism. It isn't complicated. The smears are just preaching to the choir. I talk to people who say BO's a moslim all the time. Confront it with down home democratic populism. The stars are aligned.
August 16, 2008 2:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
More possibilities:
• Liar
• Reckless
• Cranky
• Senile
• Corporate Greed
I think it's too late for Flip Flopper to work very well. Lobbyist Shill seems a bit to general; it doesn't necessarily imply evil.
C'mon, people, it's almost time to think like a Republican. If you want to stimulate the lizard brain...
McCain is insane.
Besides, it's truth in advertising.
August 16, 2008 2:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whistle while you work.
John McCain’s a jerk.
Larry Craig did bite his weenie.
Now it doesn’t work!
August 16, 2008 5:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Everyday in every way the ObaBots show their vacuous stupidity.
But is OK.
After tonguing ObaAss all this time you are beginning to choke on the ObaShit.
All hail the Lawn Jockey in Chief!
All hail Putin's ButtBoy!
August 16, 2008 5:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
After these commercials start to fade from memory, the residual take-away from McCain's ads for the Low Information Voter may be just the voices of 200,000 people shouting in unison: Obama! Obama! Obama!
This could all backfire on McCain...
August 16, 2008 6:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah yes, the sound of 200,000 Germans shouting Heil Obama!
In front of the Leaning Tower of Pisa even!
What the ObaBots don't get is that McCain's "celebrity" meme works because it is so true...
Hussein really does think he is the second coming...
The ObaBots really are retarded cult members...
Dems really do think that any opposition to Hussein is ignorant racism.
Sadly "community organizer" is not job training for the executive.
And while Americans may love Bono they ain't about to make him president.
Now throw CryptoIslamoTerrorist into the mix and Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
Even better, Hussein in one week has proven himself willing if not eager to take it up the ass from both Putin and Hillary!
It is clear that Michele owns the only pair in that Crack House.
And when will he move beyond his whiney "Oh they called me a nigger!" bull?
PS Hussein has now flipfloped on his Social Security plans.
And what little plan he has he wants to become law in TEN YEARS.
Haven't we had enough of one shithead kicking cans down the road?
August 16, 2008 6:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
You work so hard to sound convincing, JTHB, it's almost like you believe what you are saying.
The "celebrity" theme totally contradicts the far more effective smear that Obama is a foreigner, an outsider, and a question mark. There are few concepts Americans are more comfortable with than that of celebrity. Americans spend millions on products endorsed by celebrities. We buy magazines to learn about their private lives and gawk at pictures of celebrities getting their mail and walking their dog. Being a celebrity in America doesn't make you weird or aloof or foreign. Just the opposite: it makes people think they know you. It is comforting and reassuring.
Clearly, we agree about one thing: smearing Obama as a "CryptoIslamoTerrorist" is a dirty, purely negative, and potentially effective attack. But even you have to admit that it is totally at odds with the notion that Obama is a mega-celebrity, loved by millions of adoring fans. Celebrity = safe and familiar in our culture. And if Obama really is the "biggest celebrity in the world," McCain has about as much chance of labeling him a "CryptoIslamoTerrorist" as he does of branding Tiger Woods or Michael Phelps as Hamas suicide bombers.
So here's my suggestion to you: instead of expending so much energy making transparent arguments to liberals, focus on telling the McCain campaign to stop this disastrous strategy before it blows up in their face.
August 16, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
As if dropping napalm on women and children and getting your wrinkled rump shot out of the sky is.
August 17, 2008 6:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
August 16, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find all of this concern over the "celebrity" theme pretty goddamn surprising. The "celebrity" attack is a very dangerous theme for McCain to push. The chances of it back-firing on him seem extraordinarily high to me.
Do Americans hate Tiger Woods because he is the biggest and most popular athlete in the world? No, they love him for it because he is a winner. A superstar. A hero to millions here and abroad. How about Michael Phelps? Do we complain about the applause going to HIS head? Americans like this shit, folks. Americans want to be the best, to be admired around the world, to inspire and lead. Most Americans don't want to be hated around the world. They want to take pride in being citizens of the greatest nation in human history. They want to be loved.
With that in mind, can someone explain: how does John McCain benefit from leading off his dreary, grumpy ad on taxes with the sounds and images of hundreds of thousands of hyped up Obama fans chanting Obama's name like his is JFK reincarnate? Granted, I am an Obama fan, but instant reaction to the ad is: why are all those people cheering? As far as branding goes, there are worse things for Barack Obama to be then the biggest political superstar since JFK.
Don't get me wrong, Karl Rove has his moments. Portraying John Kerry as a bumbling, pompous, self-contradictory fool was a GOOD critique. It made Kerry an object of derision and scorn. It was purely negative and highly effective.
Portraying Obama as a political superstar with massive throngs of energized, psyched up supporters? That is a very mixed message. Sure, it turns off a certain kind of grumpy, skeptical voter. But for the average American exhausted by the Bush years, it delivers another message: millions of people love and trust Obama.
August 16, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see how the politics of envy can work. The message that resonates from this line of politics is one that McCain is a loser. If he wants to play that game, let him.
August 16, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
After breaking his Telecom pledge Obama has a growing credibility gap. He would do well to recall the ubiquity of the web and the spread of word of mouth before he issues anymore misleading ads.
August 16, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK so I am a totally turned off to the DNC voter. I am pissed off the DNC let Bush steal the presidency from Gore, I am pissed off they let Kerry get Swiftboated, I am angry about the way they treated Michigan and Florida delegates in this election.
And now I am super pissed off that they are allowing that wife cheater, bumbling old mean spirited nasty old white haired cuckold of a man put out these attack ads. He is laughing at Obama and the DNC is taking the "high road". F That!
Obama's and the DNC's camp should be watching the videos and ads this website is doing to counter punch old McCain and fight back and stop being pussies.
If they don't and McCain wins, then the Democratic Party is over. Please call McCain out for what his is and be done with it!
And yes... the reason I supported Hillary was because she has the balls to win this. But I will do everything what i can to make sure Obama is our next president. America as we know it will be over if McCain wins. PLEASE DNC WAKE UP AND FIGHT BACK.
My new ad:
McCain, Cuckold to Big Oil
McCain, Cuckold to Bush (Hehe I like that one)
McCain, Cuckolds his wife at Sturgis
McCain, Cuckold... oh the list goes on.
August 16, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama will have to start asking his supporters to "stop cheering so much, and maybe boo a little, because if I'm too popular, it will cost me votes."
August 17, 2008 4:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Audio from the latest (in an apparently endless series) of McCain "Celebrity" ads is up.
August 18, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink