Nasty Attack Ad Hits Jewish Dem Congressman For Visiting "Our Churches"
This brutal new attack ad from House candidate Nikki Tinker, who is challenging liberal Tennessee Rep. Steven Cohen in tomorrow's Democratic primary, just might be the nastiest, most race-baiting (and Jew-baiting) ad of the entire cycle:
"While he's in our churches, clapping his hands and tapping his feet ... he's the only senator who thought our kids shouldn't be allowed to pray in school," the announcer says, referring to an old vote against school prayer from when Cohen was a state senator. And remember, this is coming from a Democrat.
Cohen is the only white Congressman from a majority-minority district in the South, and was elected largely because of the divided field of black candidates in the 2006 primary, which included Tinker herself. Tinker never really stopped running against him, and has picked up the support of EMILY's List and a few members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
Furthermore, Cohen is a Jew -- which makes the "our churches" line all the more suspicious. Tinker's campaign has not yet returned our call for comment on what message the ad is supposed to communicate.
Late Update: Tinker's campaign has pulled the ad from their YouTube account. We can only hope it's also been pulled from the local airwaves.















As a Ist termer in the House, I find Rep. Cohen to quite effective on the HJC and his questions do reasonate! I hate to him attacked in this fashion and it sure as heel stinks!
August 6, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hate to think of this trash as an opportunity, but Obama could do well to come out and forcefully denounce this anti-Semitic crap.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 6, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
No shit, he should come out against her and sink her like a rock.
August 6, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why? Why involve himself in a local race with questionable actions by BOTH candidates? Because he's black?
August 6, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
What questionable actions by Cohen?
August 6, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
An apology for slavery? Really? When your district is struggling like the 9th, you are focusing on an apology?
August 6, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's see, which is worse:
1) Saying you support an apology for slavery.
2) Saying your Jewish opponent is not 'one' of us after your political allies spread around leaflets calling him a 'Jesus-hating Jew.'
Yeah, that's a tough one.
August 6, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's been nothing like this from Cohen's camp.
Tinker's race is being brought up to excuse the fact that Obama and the rest of the Dem party leadership are acting like cowards on this.
August 6, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
How is Obama being a coward? What does he stand to gain by involving himself in this campaign? Get a grip.
August 6, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Haha! Obama doesn't stand to gain anything personally therefore he and the rest of the Dem leadership are not being cowards?
Great logic!
August 6, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
If John Kerry was running and Tinker played this ad, would be screaming for the PRESIDENTAL nominee to get involved. I don't think so.
August 6, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stroszek, you D-bag: How do you know Obama is even aware of this?
I just found out about this when I read the post on the front page which I've only visited about 20 times today. An hour ago, I was playing Texas Hold'em on Facebook. And I'm still at work. I dare say that Barack Obama is probably a little busier than most of us right now... Give him time to visit TPM and catch up on the day's news before you brand him a coward for something of which he might be totally unaware.
(And yes, the point of this post is to highlight my diminished productivity today. What of it?)
August 6, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I apologize. Stroszek is totally a D-bag, but that could've been kept to myself. I stand by the rest of my remarks...
August 6, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
And to think people here wonder why the stupid attack by association strategy of the MSM has such power. Idiocy.
August 6, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
absolutely disgraceful
August 6, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah the ad is pretty disgraceful, I think shes going to lose after this ad.
OMG, Photo of Edwards with Love Child, In HOTEL
August 6, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's with you and your sick obsession with trying to smear John Edwards? You're one sick puppy.
August 6, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am not suspicious - I'm convinced. The Repugs are stripping every last veneer of respectability off their movement - they really are aimed like an arrow at the heart of that part of White America that is scared shitless of the entire rest of the universe.
August 6, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, Nikki Tinker is a Democrat. And African American.
August 6, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, Teena, this Tinker person is what passes for a Democrat in Tennessee.
August 6, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
So true, the Democratic party in the South is home to the Confederacy...folks keep forgetting that Lincoln was GOP.
August 6, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, now, I was attacking Tennessee, which is just a profoundly screwed up state, politically speaking. Harold Ford, Bill Frist, Fred Thompson, those damn commercials their GOP ran and they couldn't even support a goddamn residident and former senator of their own state when he was running for president. No need to get all angry ad the Dems across the whole South. In most southern states, the worst assholes in the party defected to the Republicans years ago.
August 6, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Understood. I only meant that folks forget how being a Democrat in the short is part of the legacy of the Civil War...thus it can be shocking to see the same tactics as the GOP use nationally. I do know that many of the racists defected to the GOP after the 1965 Civil Rights legislation.
Many people forget that being a primary distinction and do not get the code 'son of the south' when it comes to politics and being a Democrat below the MasonDixon line.
August 6, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see that now - sorry.
August 6, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
This AD is pretty nasty...that woman should be a republican. She is playing a big race card out there
August 6, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, "our" is about race, not religion. They don't really clap their hands and tap their feet in those other churches.
August 6, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Awww...I'm really feelin the Christian love and compassion that I'm always hearing about.
August 6, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to that. What this ad is saying - in pretty blatant terms - is that Cohen is a JEW, and that even if he's an effective representative for the district, he's still a JEW and he's NOT BLACK ENOUGH for this district.
So much for the NYT Magazine article on "Is Obama the End of Black Politics?"
Oy vey!
August 6, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
WTF? I'm SO GLAD I moved from Tennessee when I was child.
August 6, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
The CBC members who are backing her need to be called on this one as well. This is unacceptable.
August 6, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please.
Unacceptable to the CBC?
Ha! The chair of the CBC is the mother of Kwame Kilpatrick and her advice to her son was to NOt resign after his scandalous lying testimony that cost Detroit 8Million dollars just to hide some skank affair.
Also the CBC did NOT endorse Obama...the ONLY black Senator..so those folks are not leveraging a darn thing on race.
Political opportunists every single one of them!
The CBC endorsed HRC.
And StephanieTubbsJones and SheilaJacksonLee and Meeks ALL campaigned ferociously for her, despite their districts voting overwhemingly for Obama.
This ad is not about race.
What it highlights is the religious divide in this country and everyone who pays attention knows that eleven AM on Sunday is THE most segregated hour in America.
Politics and religion go handinhand in the black community.
August 6, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tire of black people having to account for all the actions of every other black person.
August 6, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
WORD.
August 6, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I couldn't agree more. Has Tiger Woods had a microphone jammed in his face so he can be asked about Obama yet?
August 6, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Didn't you get the memo--black people are responsible for everything every other black person has ever said. If they don't apologize, feel guilty, or whatever others deem acceptable, they're cowards.
August 6, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Fortunately, that rule doesn't apply to use white folks. Not that it would make a difference, of course, because we'd have absolutely nothing for which an apology would be required or guild appropriate.
August 6, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, bperk
I understand completely.
August 6, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is the video link working..I jsut get this perpetual arrow circle...and no video
August 6, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a hell of alot of commentary for someone who didn't even see the ad. Just sayin is all.
Having seen the ad I find it reprehensible not just for the anti-semetic aspect but the prayer in schools BS. You can proselytize in public schools when you teach tolerance for all races, religions and lack thereof in Sunday school folks. How about that?
August 6, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg..are you saying this is racist because the guy is white and the opponent is black OR are you saying this is anti-semitic because he is Jewish?
If the guy was not Jewish would this be an issue?
If the guy was black would this be an issue?
Please give more info.
Because from what I can tell this is a direct appeal to the heavily religious African American community.
Even the voiceover is a black voice.
I find this ad to be much moreso about religion than race.
August 6, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would not be hasty to read anti-semitism into the statement (although I cannot watch it so I do not know if there is a special emphasis on the "our" part there.)
It is just old-fashioned theism.
August 6, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
indeed there is, as transcribed above: "while he's in our churches," etc
August 6, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but it could just as easily be our black churches rather than our christian churches. You know the white politician going to the black church to get votes.
August 6, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
our churches says that Cohen does not belong to their churches.
One is Christian and the other is not.
August 6, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's both. It's anger that a Jew is representing a majority Black district. so they hit him because he is not like the majority of the district 2X by using the "our churches" line. Once, because he's jewish, and the second time because he's not Black.
considering this is a Democratic primary - it's despicable no matter how you slice it.
August 6, 2008 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
This ad may be a prime facie reason why prayer should not be allowed in public schools.
August 6, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
O my...that would be sacrereligious in the BIBLE BELT
August 6, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha! I was reminded of the Simpsons Maude Flanders' line: "I was at bible camp learning how to be more judgemental"
August 6, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice, second time this year Emily's List has chosen the vagina over the better candidate, only to have that candidate employ race-baiting. Nice.
I lost all respect for Emily's List in the run up to the Iowa caucus.
August 6, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Emily's List only endorses women. That is part of their mission. It might well be a silly mission, but it is pointless to complain as if they ought to have endorsed Cohen. Their very reason for being is to back pro-abortion women candidates.
August 6, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then they really need to reevaluate their "mission". God knows that I'm in favor of diversity in our ranks of leadership, but EMILY's List's mission seems fundamentally misguided to me. After witnessing some of the attacks that they chose to run with against Obama in the primary, and now seeing the candidate that they have chosen to back over a very progressive Democratic sitting House member, I have to wonder if they themselves see that they are acting in a manner destructive to their own professed goals.
August 6, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
You will get no argument from me. I remember when Michigan lost a house seat after the 2000 census and Lynn Rivers was forced into a primary race with John Dingell to see who would continue to represent the consolidated district. Dingell was obviously the candidate with more seniority and more plum committee positions, so most democratic activist groups in the district backed him, but Emily's List went with Rivers. Rivers voting record on abortion rights was essentially identical to Dingell's, but Rivers was a woman and Dingell's was a man. Dumb politics if you ask me, but Emily's List did not ask me and I will certainly concede that they are free to do with their money whatever they darn well like, even if they spend it to cut off their noses to spite their faces.
August 6, 2008 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess if you are satisfied that women number all of 16% of Congress, then Emily's List is misguided.
August 6, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
no. their mission is misguided because it operates on the assumption that ANY woman (if she is pro-choice and a democrat) is better than ANY man (even if he is a pro-choice democrat).
August 6, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess if you support religious bigotry against a fellow Democratic candidate then Emily's list is a good idea.
Their premise is seriously misguided. Are there not enough candidates running against Republicans or for open seats to support? Do they have to embrace antisemitism against a fellow Democratic candidate as well?
August 6, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
right.
working to get more women elected is certainly a worthwhile mission. but that is an inaccurate and incomplete description of their mission.
August 6, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then they need to re-evaluate which races they endorse in. Yes, Cohen won his election last time out because of a very tight primary which pitted multiple Black Democrats against each other... but he has served well since being in office, so they should have just stayed out of this race completely.
August 6, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
well she knows if she beats Cohen she will be the general election winner.
so she is gonna do whatever it takes to get rid of him.
i dont see this as a big deal. its politics people. this isn't a seat that we need to worry about come November and that is most important.
August 6, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's utter bullshit. If a Republican had used these tactics, half of this bloglist would be crying "foul!" Being African American and a Democrat doesn't buy you a pass on ethics.
August 6, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
August 6, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
well she knows if she beats Cohen she will be the general election winner.
so she is gonna do whatever it takes to get rid of him.
i dont see this as a big deal. its politics people. this isn't a seat that we need to worry about come November and that is most important.
August 6, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anti-semitic or race-baiting? I don't know, but it is despicable either way.
August 6, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does it have to be one or the other? I'm an African-American who has spent the better part of my life in and around the Jewish community and I thought it was both.
August 6, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearly anti-Semitic and against what we are supposed to stand for.
Tell her about herself:
http://www.tinkerforcongress.com/conta
August 6, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the link. I plan on doing just that.
August 6, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anybody who thinks that using "our churches" in this context is innocent needs to look at how this campaign has played out.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/02/jewish_rep_cohen_battles_antis.html
This is absolutely race-baiting (or "jew-baiting," if people think that religion and race can be separated in cases of anti-semitism).
August 6, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Teena was on the right track - this IS the logical extension of the classic repug freakazoid tactics.
What it proves is that the xian freakazoids are no longer confined to the GOP and apparently now feel free to roam in Democratic Party fields.
I blame the DLC and all the DINOs for making it respectable for wingnut freakazoid repugs to run as "Democrats."
August 6, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Black, Democratic, Christian, and Anti-semitic.
That will certainly help Obama in the South.
August 6, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trollster, way to read an anti-Obama spin into this story -- about an ad that is the very antithesis of Obama's message.
August 6, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
And your analysis is the very antithesis of your username.
The message is meaningless, the context is everything.
August 6, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why do I get the feeling that you resemble your avatar in real life? With a different head, of course...
August 6, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
August 6, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because you have no imagination.
August 6, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's the best you can do? Back to troll school, amateur!
August 6, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearly you are a chicken in need of a one-on-one meeting with Ozzy Osborne.
Or else the product of the southern end of a northbound chicken.
Either way, no great shakes to me.
August 6, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
You want Ozzie to bite off Obama's head?
Interesting visual that.
August 6, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cluck cluck!
August 6, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's not being a troll - we're all thinking the same thing, it is this: Not that Tinker has played this card, and the YouTube video spreads virally, the press will start asking Obama "what do you think of this ad, Senator?"
And no matter how he answers he'll be screwed. If he sides with Tinker he's an anti-Semite. If he sides with Cohen, then the press will start a meme about divisiveness within the African-American wing of the Democratic Party.
It's a tough ad that is dirty from its head to its toes and apparently the "all politics is local" maxim led Tinker to think this ad would not be seen outside of her Congressional district, that no one would call her out on this.
She ought to be DOA in Democratic politics from this day forward. Her money should dry up. Her support should dry up. She ought to be persona non grata at the DNC Convention in Denver. She should be DONE.
August 6, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
No Pkohan this is false:
"If he sides with Cohen, then the press will start a meme about divisiveness within the African-American wing of the Democratic Party."
NUH-UH..the CBC did not even back their own member! He has not been endorsed by Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton...the divisiveness is very open.
August 6, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just because we know something is true doesn't mean it doesn't take on a life of its own with the traditional media.
I guarantee you Obama will somehow get squeezed on this question politically.
And may I add - hasn't Obama had enough questions about his viability with Jewish voters that he basically has to have a Sister Souljah moment in order to make sure Jewish support doesn't wane?
This whole thing reeks.
August 6, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, I agree about the money drying up.
August 6, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
not a seat we need to worry about in November
Who's "we"? Primary challenges to progressive Democratic incumbents are reactionary, crap politics.
Organizations who back them don't deserve a dime.
Something tells me Tinker's positions on sex education, contraception, abortion, and anti-discrimination issues wrt lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transsexuals are not exactly a festival of progressive values.
She's African-American and a woman. She's no progressive. But EMILY's list cares more about the gender than the policies.
August 6, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Emily's List is not an organization dedicated to getting progressive's elected. They are an organization dedicated to getting pro-choice democratic women elected.
August 6, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
right. female + pro-choice + democrat = $$$ from e.m.i.l.y's list. regardless of whether their cash and endorsements will actually end up helping or hurting the pro-choice agenda or the democratic party (or, i suppose, the chances of a pro-choice republican woman).
August 6, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I must have missed the memo that labeled 'Christianity' as a liability.
August 6, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously, wtf is wrong with Emily's list?!
Jeez.
August 6, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You tell me -
And while you're at it, tell me what is wrong with NARAL, too.
Y'all took my first comment to have such a subtle meaning that I didn't see that now I believe it's there. Don't laugh - when I write something, I just write it for myself, mainly; everyone else is on their own unless I'm asked to explain. So if you see something there I didn't see when I wrote it- that doesn't mean it's not there - maybe I meant it all along and just didn't realize it - I have ideas about writing. ;)
I don't know if you can draw a line between what has happened the last 8 years and this, but I think in fact, y'all are right - you can.
Just like I can draw a line directly from the Bush Administration's total disregard for the law and the scene I was the unfortunate auditory witness to the other night - a Taos cop just tasering the everloving shit out of a guy he had over here between two structures, so he couldn't be seen from the street. I could hear the whole thing. He taunted the guy and then I'd hear that thing buzz and the guy would scream - o jesus.
Lawlessness and outright bigotry do just breed more of the same every fucking time. But we r not brite.
August 6, 2008 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
So true. The last 8 years have made us meaner right here at home too. I hate personal demolition. The question I posed to this woman is "does God care?"
August 6, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said TenaX
August 6, 2008 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's how I read Teena's comment, too, and she's right. The Repugs have dragged everyone so far down and to the right a Democratic candidate does not even know her party's position on church-state separation.
The woman will be for separate-but-equal next.
August 6, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, that's pretty shitty.
It's hilarious, though, how clear it is to people when it's jew-baiting from a black person, but how ambiguous it is when it's race-baiting from the Clintons and their supporters.
I can't for the life of me figure out the reason for the difference.
August 6, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
August 6, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
And does it not strike anyone else as bizaare that a Democrat is campaigning against an incumbent Democratic in a safe Democratic district over the issue of school prayer? I mean I know it's Tennessee and all, and I know we should welcome all views, but isn't this a little far afield from the type of issues that become flashpoints in safe Dem districts? And isn't it awful odd that it's coming with the backing of EMILY'S List.
And I'm not convinced that Obama has anything to gain by inserting himself into a primary race like this, especially where it's clear that Tinker may have crossed an unacceptable line.
August 6, 2008 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
YES!
August 6, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
she's not campaigning against him on school prayer, she's campaigning against him on his being JEWISH.
August 6, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, how is being Jewish separate from school prayer? Jewish people pray. this is about school prayer.
August 6, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
ignoring the subtext and context of the ad doesn't make it go away.
August 7, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh YES! HokNY...this is most odd
August 6, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes - safe Dem. seat, liberal Congressman.
Why can't everyone leave a good situation alone?
Oh, I forgot - it's Tennessee!
August 6, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see it has.
August 6, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Black or White, TN has some of the worse politicians (with apologies to Al Gore Jr and Sr) to ever run for office. They play a mean spirited brand of campaigning that would make Alabama blush!
August 6, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Horrible. She should get her evil ass handed to her. Hopefully by Barack.
August 6, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
What angers me the most is that she has the gall to conflate the issue of school prayer with the issue of apology/reparations for slavery as though there is universal consensus on the overlap of these issues in the black community. It is both intellectually and morally offensive.
August 6, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, that is infuriating. It belittles slavery, just like comparing every fucking thing to the holocaust belittles the holocaust.
Silly woman - she's hurting herself, not helping.
August 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I only hope it does.
August 6, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I went to her website and wrote her an email. Amazing that someone who wants to serve in the 'peoples' house' lacks the basic fundamental understanding that the people she wants to serve aren't all going to look like her or worship in the same manner as her. So to use his 'difference' as some sort of liability is soo damn republican that it deserves the same mocking, scorn and disdain that we would heap on any repug doing the same thing.
August 6, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Next, will she describe Cohen's position on Israel? It might be interesting to compare her position to his, if there is any breathing space between them.
August 6, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only that, but to run an ad that says "Steve Cohen must not be very sincere about his support for Black issues because he, like most Democrats, opposes school prayer".
Double You. Tee. Eff.
August 6, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think this has anything to do with him being a jew. it has everything to do with him being white and not supportive of the christian church. That is to say I'm pretty sure the same ad would have been made if he were christian and not supportive or agnostic and not supportive. I, of course, have no idea whether the guy supports the church but that's the narrative that I see being floated - not that he's a jew.
course, I don't live there and I dunno shit but on the surface, that's my read.
August 6, 2008 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
'not supportive of the christian church' translates into plain english as: 'JEW!' (but i've also seen it translated more literally as, "Christ Killer!") when used in this context.
August 6, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It depends how easily you accept the logic that church-state separation = not supportive of the christian church. This is the type of stark black/white binary we have long expected from the GOP, not directed from one Democrat to another.
August 6, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is really bad. Coming after her 'Cohen loves the KKK' ad, she couldn't be any lower..
I am jewish and going to be of voting age in 2 years. I will not register as a democrat if cohen is ousted. I would be so offended that the national party let something like this happen.
August 6, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
You got a link to this ad?
August 6, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's just silly. I'm sure the DNC didn't watch this in the conference room and go "Hey, that's exactly what we need more of!"
Think. Act. React. Never be reactionary.
August 6, 2008 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I'm dead positive that that just failed Occam's Razor all to hell.
August 6, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Disagree. I think the "White" interpretation is much more quickly arrived at than the "Jewish" one. Maybe there's a history here we don't know about, but that was my first impression.
August 6, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh agrees with me - for once - he's on the front page with it.
Y'all are stretching it - I really believe, all out of shape. It's a straight up anti-semitic smear.
August 6, 2008 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was a Democrat?
I really don't think it had as much to do with him being Jewish as him being White. Either way, it's fucked up. I don't like seeing racial politics played for anyone's benefit.
August 6, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
when black ministers in tennessee are distributing fliers that say "congressman steve cohen and the jews HATE JESUS" i think it's fair to say that tinker's 'our churches' line is of a piece. context is everything.
August 6, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I cannot believe she's a Democrat either, Sci.
Does anyone know if the TN state Dem Party can say something to her?
August 6, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with your analysis Scientific, it is about race and it is horrible.
August 6, 2008 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just wrote to Tinker and told her to stop calling herself a Democrat. I told her that her ad was bigoted and disgusting, and my response would be to donate to Cohen. Which I just did. http://www.actblue.com/contribute/entity/12856
August 6, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who know Tinker knows to trust her no farther than you can see her! I will not vote for her tomorrow and don't know any thinking person in the city of Memphis who will! The fact that she lied about her occupation should be enough to give anyone pause!This heifer is a MANAGER at Pinnacle Airlines! Cohen had to call her on it before she grudingly told the truth! She lies slick as a snake!
If she will lie about something so basic and easy to check, she is non too bright on top of being untrustworthy! Voters might ask themselves, what else has she and will she lie about? BIG BUSINESS AGENDAS ARE HER AGENDAS!
Outside of her mother and grandmother, she could give less than a tinker's damn(pardon the pun)about the rest of us black people! White people don't stand a chance in hell! Race baiting is right on par with who she is!
August 6, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I, personally, don't see race baiting in the ad, but I don't think that matters. What does matter is, someone said it's race baiting so therefore, it's race baiting.
August 6, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I beg to differ NCSteve and vicissitudes! I AM a democrat and I AM black and I live in TN! I AM not nor will I ever be a Redumblician! Nikki is a bitch and a liar. She is Redumblican masquerading as a Democrat. Don't insult me by lumping me in the same category with that ghetto hoodrat!
August 6, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, get that now. Thanks for the local angle and no offense intended.
But come on, now you gotta admit that you guys do grow your Republicans extra, extra evil there. I feel for you, though, I really do. Jesse Helms used to be one of my Senators and my representative is Virginia Foxx, so I know what that's like.
August 6, 2008 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I live in TN and go to Memphis for work alot. This is about race not religion. Black people around here enjoy good relationships with Jewish people. Steve Cohen is known around here and looked upon favorably. Memphis politics is so corrupt and people are fed up with it. This is not going to work. Nikki Tinker should be ashamed of herself.
August 6, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
She was going to lose anyway. This ad like the other, is pure desperation!
August 6, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
A little background:
This district is the one that was held by the Ford family for decades. They are a powerful African American family in Memphis, and have been involved (for better or worse) in Tennessee politics - local state and national - for as long as I can remember. Steve Cohen has been one of the more liberal politicians to come from Tennessee since Gore, and has a decades-long history of political involvement as well. This Congressional seat became available when Harold Ford Jr. ran for senate against the contemptible Bob Corker (remember the "call me" ad?).
That Steve Cohen was elected was unexpected, perhaps, but no one should take anything away from him. He is easily one of, if not the best Congressman from TN, and it would be a real shame to lose him.
August 6, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
yep. She's mad because she thinks that Black folk should vote for her just because she's Black...WRONG!
August 6, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's pretty much what I got. "hey, I'm black and we go to _our_ church so you should vote for me."
August 6, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm an African American. I don't like the ad and I support Cohen's position about prayers in public schools but I'm not getting the anti-Semitism. I'm not saying the ad does not carry anti-Semitic connotations but I'm missing them. Please elaborate on this point.
August 6, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just hit TPM - the front page - read Josh's take on it.
August 6, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Same principle as McCain's (brief and pathetic) "Real American President for Real Americans in America" concept -- basically, you take an aspect of your opponent that you can't attack in decent company and then either punch up the opposites you supposedly embody ("Real American" versus "Untrustworthy African") or obliquely bring up those aspects in such a way that only people predisposed to react to them will notice.
The term you usually hear for this is "dog-whistle politics," and it was perfected by Dixiecrats and Southern-Strategy Republicans to use against blacks in a bid for conservative white voters. For example, Nixon liked to talk about "law and order" -- an innocuous phrase, except that it was specifically meant to evoke in white voters images of rioting blacks in inner cities. (Back when I lived in Louisiana, David Duke -- as you probably remember -- had a pretty good run using the same slime and poison.) It worked, and kept working for ... well, actually, it still works today.
The key for exposing dog-whistles is to look at context. In this case, the ad comes on the heels of a nasty set of anti-Semitic fliers supporting Tinker that were distributed by black churches in Murfreesboro (which is outside the voting area, I believe). The fliers basically said, "Steve Cohen and the Jews hate Jesus, and we need to send a Christian to Congress." Tinker never -- as far as I know -- responded to media questions about the fliers, and now she launches an ad that emphasizes Cohen's "otherness" (basically, "How dare a Jew come to our churches?").
If this were an innocent ad, then it would have been pulled before launch due to the controversy over the antisemitic fliers; no political pro would risk a backlash like this when they've already got a bunch of bio spots in the can and could substitute them. Furthermore, the timing -- coming right before the election -- suggests that they wanted maximum impact while minimizing the time the media or the Cohen campaign could respond.
August 6, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's interesting here that the "our churches" comment is so disturbing it's kind of drowning out the blatant and similarly disturbing attack on separation of church and state in the public schools that's right next to it. I'd like to take a moment to focus on the prayer-in-public-schools issue.
Does Emily's List not see that endorsing this kind of rhetoric hurts abortion rights in the long run? If churches have a right to dictate what happens in our schools-- to the point that opposing such dictation is the same as saying "our kids shouldn't be allowed to pray in school"-- then they have the right to dictate what happens in our hospitals. If being against prayer in public schools is being anti-religion-- to the point that there's something wrong with a candidate with such a position, be they Jewish or otherwise, visiting a church-- then one might as well say that disagreeing with those churches on abortion is being anti-religion as well. I don't think you can endorse dominionism on one point without strengthening it on other points as well.
Actually, is Tinker pro-choice at all? Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but looking on google apparently she took a very long time in the primary to take any position on abortion at all, and once she did it was of the "against abortion, but the government should stay out of it" type. It appears in this case Emily's List is actually endorsing the candidate that's to the right on abortion?
August 6, 2008 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if she's copying Harold Ford, Jr.'s line, then it's safe to say that EMILY's List is funding the more anti-abortion candidate. (Also anti-gay marriage and anti-union, but hey -- this is the DLC candidate we're talking about.)
August 6, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
She managed to get the endorsement of groups on both sides of a couple of issues by not having a stand on any issue. Her only issue position is, "He's not black." In the only debate the first question for her was what vote has representative Cohen made that you would have voted differently on. She could not name one. I thought that just about summed up her vacuous campaign right there.
August 6, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
All Emily's List sees or cares about is that Tinkker has a vagina and Cohen doesn't. They've made it perfectly clear that that's the only criterion they think is relevant over these last few years.
August 6, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope. Try again.
August 6, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm: Emily's List condemns Tinker/Cohen ad. Good for them.
August 7, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
disgusting... what, can't campaign and win on your own merits, so it's okay to take a page from the Rovian playbook??? Pathetic
August 6, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems pretty clear to me she intends for viewers to understand "our churches" to mean "black churches." Isn't that what clapping hands and stamping feet is supposed to connote?
August 6, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Being pretty familiar with the completely dysfunctional thinking of Cristian fundamentalists both black and white I can't say I'm all that convinced this is Jew baiting. I can understand why some people would hear it that way, especially if they are Jewish but I'm honestly not sure that was really the intent of this vile spot.
It's deplorable. It is despicable and idiotic, but I think there's an even money chance that this is simply intended to feed off the idiotic beliefs of the ignorant fundamentalists about prayer in school combined with trying to get some mileage off the fact that he isn't black (that's what I hear more when they refer to "our" churches is a reference to race more than I do a reference to religion). The kind of people who would have put this ad together, approved it and so forth are genuine mean-spirited morons, the kind of people who should be driven from politics in this or any other country. It's particularly sickening that the candidate herself narrates this appalling bullshit ad.
Now perhaps that's just me and I'm misreading it, but that's my take on it. Regardless of whether it is or isn't Jew baiting per se--something I think reasonable people could have differing opinions about---it is without any question one of the most digusting, scummy, dirty, sleazy ads I've ever seen. Any organization that has endorsed or supported this vile woman vs Cohn (who has an excellent track record in Congress by any standard)should withdraw that support and publicly condemn this sickening garbage. Also, the candidate should withdraw from the race in disgrace after publicly apologizing.
One last thing, it is particularly grotesque to me that such a slimeball attack would be made under the guise of someone claiming to be a Christian. Every Christian in that district should shun that ignorant, bigoted woman.
August 6, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read Josh's piece. That is why I asked for some further explanation. Cohen should be reelected. Tinker is just a shill for Harold Ford, his family and corporate interests that do not have the best interests of the folks in Cohen's district at heart. I know they are running on a b.s. black bourgeois nationalist theme (e.g. "our churches") but I'm not picking up the anti-Semitism. What I am asking is for folks who do to help me out here.
August 6, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't think the "black churches" part was Jew-baiting part - that was the white vs. black part. I think it was the whole Christian prayer part that was Jew baiting. It seemed to be implying that Cohen didn't want their children saying that sort of thing.
August 6, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure that the Christian prayer was part of the anti-Semitism unless you mean that the ad was designed, in part, to tell Christians, chiefly black Christians, that Jews do not regard Jesus Christ as the Messiah or the Son of God. The reference to "our churches" seems less pointed in terms of exploiting anti-Semitism than in making a blatant nationalist appeal based, in part, on skin color and shared religious beliefs that Jews do not subscribe to at all.
August 6, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because "our churches" is code for "We don't want a JEW representing our district." It's so in your face how could you NOT see it?
Heck, there probably aren't even many Jews in Memphis and that district to begin with, but this ad offends Jews nationwide.
This is america. We're supposed to not discriminate based on religion, color, or creed, right? Isn't that the ideal? This ad says that ideal is not only bunk, but not desired. No wonder we allow our government to torture people. Our sense of idealism has been completely corroded.
August 6, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
What Tinker needs to understand is that many folks down here are really fed up with the embarassments of the Fords and have really been disappointed with the way that Harold Jr has been badmouthing Obama on MSNBC, so she doesn't need to be banking on her Ford connections or her nasty ads. Cohen will win.
August 6, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just for the record: There have been some extreme anti-Semitic, anti-Cohen flyers and mailers during this campaign, coming from "fringe" black preachers. Tinker claims no connection to them, but at the same time she is openly accepting support from other local preachers that are nearly as extreme (e.g. LaSimba Gray) in their black nationalism. Her disavowals just don't pass the smell test with many of us locals. So, when we see a commercial like this one...
August 6, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to see some of them to put this ad in context. Links?
fwiw, "black nationalism" != "anti-Semitic"
August 6, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/02/jewish_rep_cohen_battles_antis.html
August 7, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I live in a black neighborhood in his district and his signs out number hers many fold. I am going to his watch party tomorrow night. I hope it will be a victory celebration.
August 6, 2008 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's so in your face how could you NOT see it?"
I have politely asked for anyone to explain to me what I could not see. Your so-called response is not helpful. And, no, I don't necessarily even see a scumbag like Tinker using the words "our churches" as code for we don't Jews representing our district. I have little doubt that this is what Tinker believes but I can't get that from those two words.
August 7, 2008 1:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
In the context of this campaign I do not think her 'our churches' coment was antisemitic. It was racist. Her sole attack on him has been, "he's not black."
August 7, 2008 8:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like Tinker has done things like this before. Here's a news clip about one of her ads suggesting Cohen may be a racist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5uSy1SrFwM
August 7, 2008 7:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is raining its ass off in Memphis this morning. That shoul.d drive turnout down in what was already going to be a low turnout election. I am hoping this will help Rep Cohen. We will know tonight wether Ms Tinker's racist campaign worked.
He is going to face a chalenge like this every two years as long as he is in the house. I hope he can weather them.
August 7, 2008 8:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Harold Ford, jr & the Ford family machine in Memphis have their fingerprints all over the Tinker campaign. This is emblematic of their political operation: keep their family members or cronies in office. Now that jr doesn't hold a govt office & TN senator Uncle John Ford was indicted for accepting bribes, the Fords are worried about loosing their special place in govt where they can trade favors to increase the family assets.
Steve Cohen is one of the most progressive candidates in congress. He needs to stay there.And the Fords - including Harold, jr need to have progressives shine some sunshine into their business dealings.
- a progressive & tennessean
August 7, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
What an idiotic thing to say. Harlod Ford Jr's younger brother was in this race and ran against Nikki Tinker, with some not so nice things to say about her. But, don't let me stop your hate train!
August 7, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was 06. This is 08.
August 7, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
06, 08, where's the proof that the Ford family is behind this? I'm no fan of Harold Ford and don't care for his centerist politics, but to smear his family by associating them with this racist is not appropriate either. They have done enough things of their own, to be called on. But, this wasn't one of them!
August 7, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was just saying that Harrold Ford Jr's younger brother was not in this race. He was in that one. I know of no Ford involvement in her campaign.
August 7, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does it say, "Sorry, this video no longer available"? Without the video, the article is kinda pointless.
August 7, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/207410.php
August 7, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
holy fuck.
August 7, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
dang login system. that was in reply to fkaZk0sm0's post of: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/02/jewish_rep_cohen_battles_antis.html
Posted by
August 7, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The video reflects on Tinker more than Cohen; if this beats him he should have not been in the race. He is either well respected on not; I gather that he is well respected and this ad will accomplish nothing for his opponents. The term Jew baiting was earlier used, and it is unclear what it means; I read the ad as a religious push in that specific district. Obama should have left this alone or have a supporter address the issue if necessary; I am not interested with him being too aligned to any religion, Wright was too much. Cheap trick follow cheap tricks......; this story has the feel of too many cheap tricks; these are more significant than the supposed religious and racial overtones.
August 7, 2008 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink