« GOP Rep. To Environmentalists: Jesus Already Saved The Planet | Home | McCain: "Today We Are All Georgians" »

McCain Supports Tax Breaks For Oil Industry -- But Not For Wind Power

Here's something else that could create political complications for John McCain in key swing states as he continues to defend measures that would maintain tax breaks for the oil industry: He recently opposed extending tax breaks for the wind-power industry.

Making this more difficult for McCain, the fledgling wind-power industry is popular in key upper Midwest and central plains states -- and here you have McCain protecting such tax breaks for Big Oil, but opposing them for Big Wind, or, if you prefer, Little Wind.

McCain recently opposed the big $300 billion farm bill, which itself is extremely popular throughout the upper midwest, describing the bill as "a $300 billion, bloated, pork-barrel-laden bill" because of subsidies for industries like ethanol.

But in a little-noticed development, the bill also contained a measure extending a tax break for developing wind power, which McCain specifically opposed. Obama backed it. According to Senator Tom Harkin, an Obama ally, the wind energy industry is employing close to 2,000 people, some concentrated in those key swing states. It's little local issues like these that can move votes in states where the voting is expected to be extremely close.

Making matters more difficult for McCain, Congressional Dems, such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are edging towards supporting that recent bipartisan compromise energy bill that would open up some areas for drilling but repeal Big Oil's tax breaks.

This ups the pressure on McCain, because it forces him to keep defending his opposition to such a compromise, making it easier to tie him to Big Oil.

The slogan writes itself. McCain: Big Oil, yes, Little Wind, no.

Late Update: To clarify, the wind-power trade group says the industry overall employs 50,000 people. Harkin likely meant they employ 2,000 people in Iowa specifically.

Late Late Update: An interesting take from Steve Benen, who adds the crucial context that McCain's position on Little Wind is at odds with his rhetoric.


20 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Olive growers deserve a break . . .

user-pic

Tom Friedman also hit McCain hard on failing to show up for votes on extending solar and wind tax credits and opposing them in the past, while airing an ad in the Olympics showing windmills turning.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/opinion/13friedman.html

I don't think we want to put "McCain" and "little wind" in the same slogan. We might get accused of ageism.

John McCain: A Mighty Wind!

IOW, we must stop McCain from Breaking Wind.

Mr. Obama: Repeat after me:

Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.

Green = Jobs.
Alternative = Jobs.
Renewable = Jobs.

Does McCain want to see EVERY country in the world beating us out of our alternative, competitive edge? Doesn't he like Murka?

Greg, great article. Just wanted to point out that the wind industry currently employs around 50,000 people, not 2,000.

http://www.awea.org/newsroom/wind_energy_news/AWEA_to_House_Small_Business_Committee_071108.html

Pish posh. Who cares about silly old votes on silly old bills? John McCain is spending millions of dollars to run a commercial with windmills in it during the Olympics and eveyone knows he's a straight talking Maverick, so if he puts windmills in his commericials and says he's for 'em, that's all we need to know.

If you want to talk about the past you can come up with anything. McCain is talking about the future...

user-pic

Greg, this fits into the overall theme of McCain, who sees essential infrastructure spending as "pork."

When he was asked recently recently what's the first thing he would do to help the economy he said he would "cut spending."

This guy has no clue.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

So let's see... McCain opposed the Granddaddy of all pork, the Farm Bill and a tiny part of that bill was tax breaks for Wind Power startups.
Hussein on the other hand supported that Mother of all PorkFests.
Not to mention Hussein's support for the Bush Energy Bill with its RECORD BREAKING TAX BREAKS FOR OIL!
So was Hussein being a Lying Asshole then or is he being a Lying Asshole now?
Trick question: Hussein is ALWAYS being a Lying Asshole.
All hail the Lawn Jockey in Chief!

And by the way, it is Pelosi and Hussein and the Limp Dick Dems who have abandoned their position on drilling.
But hey, is OK.
We are so inured to Hussein's FlipFlopitis that it goes unremarked.
Almost.
The Say Anything Lawn Jockey in Chief.

Probably got some Mc894/899 points out of that, especially for using Hussein six times.

Maybe you'll be able to kiss his ring in a few weeks

JTHB's true identity has been revealed: Clayton Bigsby. Sad. So sad.

You are so terrifyingly racist, I can't even begin to fathom why you hate so much...

... dear god

What happened in your youth to make you so angry?

You've got to be kidding. Unfortunately, you're probably not.

A tax on wind would bankrupt many in the Republican party and a few (Clinton) in the Democratic party!

But But, there's windfarm in his attack ad! He must love windfarms like he loves soldiers: sending them off to die.

That farm bill was a nightmare, so it's hard to blame McCain for simply opposing that, but if he had a problem specificly with that tax cut, then yes, that does reflect quite badly on him.

suggest McCain change his motto to "big oil fat cats first."

This will be great fodder for more of those local issue attack ads. Very few people know that McCain's plan calls for 45 nuclear power plants by 2030-- endless coverage of Paris Hilton ads is far more important and relevant, of course.

Trickier to get across (though I am sure the Obama folks will do it) is how Obama is proposing actual, direct, and massive investment in green energy (=jobs) while McCain only offers vague promises to do ... something... with tax incentives...then acts as if he's all Mr. green giant maverick.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address