McCain On Swift-Boating Book: "Gotta Keep Your Sense Of Humor"
The Obama campaign, eager to make it known that it's responding forcefully to the new Swift-Boating book by Jerome Corsi, is jumping on a John McCain moment today where he appeared to sidestep an opportunity to condemn the book and its multiple falsehoods about Barack Obama.
Asked by a reporter today to comment on the book, McCain said: "Gotta keep your sense of humor," before his aides whisked him away.
That prompted Obama spokesperson Tommy Vietor to launch approximately a dozen tactical nukes in McCain's direction:
"The old John McCain used to boast about honorable politics, while the new John McCain finds Roveian smears funny. Honor is not a laughing matter. What does John McCain think is funny about an intolerant smear artist who called Pope John Paul II senile and claims the government lied about 9/11? McCain has said he wants to run an honorable campaign, but his belief that these smears are funny makes people question whether he now approves of the same reprehensible politics used to smear his own character eight years ago."
The point that bears repeating here is that in 2004, McCain did condemn the Swift-Boating of John Kerry, which Corsi also had a big role in. Also, McCain has claimed he wants the current campaign to be "civil."
But McCain has looked the other way when his own surrogates have questioned Obama's patriotism and American-ness, and his campaign has even endorsed these attacks. And now the same tactics that McCain condemned in 2004 are apparently just some gag that we should all have a good laugh over.
McCain campaign advisers, too, are declining to condemn the Corsi book. This morning, we asked the McCain camp if Corsi's tactics have a place in a campaign McCain himself says he hopes will remain "civil." No answer yet.
Late Update: The Associated Press reports that a McCain spokesperson is claiming that he didn't understand the question. But AP adds that the McCain campaign has no comment on -- or condemnation of -- the Corsi book.

PERFECT response!
August 15, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that tough enough for you guys?
August 15, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was a stupid answer, he should've said, "I haven't read it."
August 15, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suppose. But it's his same bullshit response when asked about his "celebrity" ads.
John McCain: thinking character assassination is hilarious since probably just after 2000
August 15, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's funny that McCain was brainwashed and tortured by the Communists when he was a POW. Sidesplitting!!! Ha ha ha.
August 15, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Does this mean Alzheimer jokes are OK by him now?
August 15, 2008 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stupid response is right. That's the point.
But wait, McCain is excused all his fuckups because (sing it with me) he was a POW!
August 15, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah that would have beeen a good response. Or he could have said that he agrees with the book. Maybe then we can have McCain on Larry King live and feed him to the nerd guy over there at Media Matters. That would be a sight to see.
Hundreds Show Up 2 the PUMA Conference - Pictures
August 15, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually his retort shows he has no moral rudder. This guy who was brow-beaten by the Bush camp about his "black baby" now employs the same sort of low life, disgusting behavior. I had thought he had more moral courage but obviously, the old McCain has sold his soul to the party of destruction and name calling. How sad to see this guy waste away his moral rudder. He is as mean and vicious as any other hate filled Republican even after being on the business end of that sort of hate filled rhetoric. Although I wrote in his name the last two elections, I shall not vote for him this time because he has joined the smut team.
August 17, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would be nice is it were reported somewhere else besides TPM.
August 15, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's "if it were reported"
August 15, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
AP interprets the "sense of humor" remark as "No Comment"
August 15, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
WTF?????
August 15, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unbelievable. From the story linked by Schmedley above:
"An Associated Press reporter tried to ask McCain for a comment Friday in Aspen as journalists were being escorted from a brief photo opportunity. McCain smiled and said, 'gotta keep your sense of humor.'
Campaign spokeswoman Brooke Buchanan said McCain did not hear the question, and the campaign had no comment."
Just another case where the candidate doesn't speak for the campaign I guess. Didn't hear the question?!?! I might buy that if he had responded with, "a ham sandwich and chips" or something equally obscure. Where is the responsible journalism?
August 15, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not hearing/understanding questions is getting to be a pattern. I don't think we want Emily Litella in the White House.
August 15, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Armchairmen, what say you?
August 15, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now if only the Obama machine can get 42 surrogates to go on all the talk shows and jam this up McCain's tailpipe like his lackys do to Obama...
August 15, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great stuff. One minor adjustment to suggest:
Should be "the old John McCain" versus "now the older John McCain".
August 15, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, friggin' hilarious. I know that I always enjoy a chuckle when someone is savagely attacking my personal character.
Douche.
http://thepajamapundit.com/
August 15, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, that's a pretty odd choice of words. And similar to Lieberman's advice about lying back and enjoying it. The danger for McCain is that he seemed to imply that there's something wrong with what Corsi is saying - why else the need to laugh at it? He tacitly implied the book is a smear.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
August 15, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
i'm hoping our friends in the corporate media will hit mccain over the head for this most blatant piece of flip-floppery.
he condemned them in 04, but now, just four years late he thinks its funny?
i'm not holding my breath though.
August 15, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
They are grading this one on a curve, so you are smart not to hold your breath....
August 15, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Slightly off topic. When did HusseinTenaX start writing for Vesti-FM?
"Russians were told over breakfast yesterday what really happened in Georgia: the conflict in South Ossetia was part of a plot by Dick Cheney, the Vice-President, to stop Barak Obama being elected president of the United States."
http://www.ruvr.ru/main.php?lng=eng&q=22513&cid=48&p=05.02.2008
August 15, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
An unprovoked personal attack? Come on SFCWallace, you are better than that.... Or maybe you aren't.
August 15, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
He isn't.
August 15, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not an attack at all...she's the designated Rove/Cheney hate the world rep...I just thought it was interesting that "The Voice of Russia's" press release could have easliy appeard unopposed in a post here...probably recieved a few Kudos.
August 15, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
And you don't hate Cheney? The man himself is evil.
August 15, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course I don't hate him and he's not "evil." You may disagree with his policies and politics but does that make him "evil?"
August 15, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do think that Cheney is evil, for having worked to help disseminate lies about weapons of mass destruction, to draw us into a war in Iraq where over 4,000 of our brave men and women in uniform lost their lives.
That kind of manipulation is evil.
August 15, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
...do you think he was wrong about the facts or do you think he intentionally decieved? If intentional, what was the purpose? If you truely think he started a war to gain personal wealth than I understand you thinking he's evil, but think you have serious "perception of reality" issues.
August 15, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think he intentionally deceived the American populace in order to gain one of the oil resources in the Middle East. It's also clear that many contractors benefitted from the Iraq war:
* These companies contributed more money to the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush — more than $500,000 — than to any other politician over the last dozen years.
Most notably, one of them is KBR, the largest civilian contractor in Iraq, a subsidiary of Halliburton. KBR was covered in the news recently for cutting corners in the construction of showers on army bases--those showers had shoddy electrical work, which led to a few dozen electrocution cases of our soldiers in using these facilities.
August 15, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
So...just to clarify, you think Cheney and Bush (not to mention the many others that would have to be in on it) intentionally lied to the world, risked the lives of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines as well as millions of Iraquis and Afgahnis, simply to personally enrich themselves and their friends?
August 15, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
afghanistan was about national security; iraq was about theft.
August 15, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
and IMO bush possibly swallowed the neocon line as much as you did.
August 15, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
If we weren't drawn into war by outright lies then the best you might say is that there was a willing suspension of disbelief. After all, there was NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF WMDS!!!
Bush threatened to invade unless Saddam proved he did not have WMDs. Ever try to prove a negative?
Inspectors were inspecting until forced out of Iraq by the warning of the invasion.
Howard Dean's patriotism was being assailed because he correctly pointed out that Iraq was no threat to the US.
The Dioxie Chicks even knew going to war was a mistake.
Yet Cheney and his demonic minions insisted, fabricating whatever evidence they could through spin, outright manufacture, or self-delusion.
I believe they wanted a war and used whatever facts, fiction, or cirsumstances they could to justify it, but if I am wrong about that it is clear they at the very least abandoned their critical thinking skills.
Cheney is either evil or stupid. Or both.
August 15, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nah. They did it because they wanted to see what America looked like with unchecked executive power. The rest was just gravy.
They have proved the founding fathers right when they wrote of the dangers of arbitrary rule, and showed that their failsafes are subject to failure when arbitrary rule is cheered on by lickspittle authoritarian-lovers like you.
August 15, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, but I just finished reading "The Dark Side"....I hesitate to use an inflammatory word like "evil"...but it goes far beyond just disagreeing with man on "policy and politics".
August 15, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Haven't read it myself but I'm sure with a title like ""The Dark Side"....it was a fair and balanced report of the life and times of Mr. Cheney.
August 15, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, then, maybe you should read up on your buddy Cheney and his enforcer Addington and then decide whether or not it's fair to conclude that he's "evil".
August 15, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I guess we should designate you the "Must hate America if you disagree with Me" poster, huh?
August 15, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think I've ever accussed anyone here of hating America.
August 15, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you are parroting the Republican Party line, that's part of the message. Comes with the territory.
August 15, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your true feelings revealed.
August 15, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Your true feelings revealed." If you think that I feel the accusation that Cheney set up the Russian conflit with Georgia to hurt Obama would be widely accepted as reasonable here then yes...guilty as charged.
August 15, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, which indicates that you think commenters here are gullible tools, unable to think critically about issues.
So if someone disagrees with you, it's not because they've thought about the issue in detail, it's because they'll believe anything.
August 15, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
"So if someone disagrees with you, it's not because they've thought about the issue in detail, it's because they'll believe anything."
Hello! Kettle!!! This is the Pot!!! It's getting really dark in here!!! Would you like a list?
August 15, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me?
I'm not the one claiming that the ridiculous claims about Cheney and Georgia would be believed and applauded by people here.
Nor am I the one implying that you, SFC, are gullible and lack the ability to think critically.
So what's this with pot meeting kettle? You talking to me?
August 15, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not you presonally however a brief glance up the thread and I'm sure you'll find "Parrot" "Limbaught""Party Line" or "Talking Points" assigned to many of my comments, simply because they are not the "TPM" party line. So tell me that the thought that Cheney would set up a sittuation where Russia invades Georgia to hurt Obama's election chances would be laughed off the page here and I'll retract everything I've said and apologize profusely.
August 15, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see commenters engaging with you.
I see one mention of Republican talking points.
And furthermore, in other threads, every time some one has labeled you a "troll", multiple people jump in and defend you.
But I guess that just means we're a bunch of gullible tools, unable to think critically.
August 15, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are actually quite a few critical thinkers in the bunch. You should count yourself amongst them. However, there are also a bunch of "Tin foil hatters" who think Bush and Cheney set off a controlled demolition to bring down the World Trade Center after warning the Jews to stay home. Sometimes the latter appear to out number the former.
August 15, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like arguing with you, SFC, and I understand the tin foil hat reference, because I feel at times (particularly in any discussion of Hillary Clinton) that there is some tin foil hattery that goes on.
But I have to say that I've never seen any poster here argue that Bush and Cheney were responsible for 9/11. Responsible for a lot of other crap, but not 9/11. And I'm surprised you make that claim.
August 15, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have been on here a long time...you used to be able to go back through your entire history of posts...there were some back then that would even get you thinking about investing in tin foil futures. You have been nothing but civil with me in 99.9% of our discussions (there've been one or two when I know you were cursing under your breath while typing) and I thank you for that and I certainly meant no offense towards you.
August 15, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have a groovy weekend, dude.
August 15, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check...you too.
August 15, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like Jerome Corsi?
August 15, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zzzzzzzing.
August 15, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't believe Cheney or Bush engineered the collapse of the twin towers, but I do believe the neocons engineered an entirely inappropriate response to it in the invasion of Iran.
August 15, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink