« McCain: I'm Questioning Obama's Patriotism? Moi? Never! | Home | New Rudy Rollout Begins »

McCain Campaign Likely To Critize Obama Over Adviser's Visit To Syria

The McCain campaign is likely going to try to make an issue today over this report in the New York Sun saying that a foreign policy adviser to Obama provided advice to the Syrian government last month, a McCain campaign source tells me.

The adviser, Daniel Kurtzer, advised Syrian foreign minister Walid al-Moallem that the next president, whether Republican or Democrat, will "make a Syrian-Israeli peace agreement a priority only if the two sides, meeting now in Turkey, make substantial progress before the inauguration," the Sun story reports.

Though Kurtzer's trip wasn't connected to the Obama campaign, and Kurtzer was in Damascus for a law conference that was underwritten by Syrian corporations and an oil company, McCain advisers think there's an opening to hit Obama over the visit, and will almost certainly do so today, though the plan could change.

The McCain team is likely to highlight the fact that the campaign knew about the trip. Kurtzer told The Sun that he'd told the campaign about it.

It's hard to predict in advance how this will play -- after all, the Obama campaign explicitly said that Kurtzer isn't a paid adviser and isn't authorized to conduct talks with any government. But it's the sort of thing that the McCain campaign might be able to get the media to play up.


Late Update: It looks like the designated attacker on the issue will be Rudy Giuliani.


33 Comments

| Leave a comment

and yet McCain gets to have his paid advisor taking money from Georgia with impunity?

We are all Georgians, so its ok.

what a presidential moment that was



Video: McCain Agrees With A Draft

user-pic

Amazing. The McCain camp is pulling the "accuse the other guy of exactly what we're doing" Republican gambit. I wonder if it will ever be pointed out in the MSM that McCain actually sent a delegation to Georgia, directly interfering with the negotiation process.

user-pic

right....but mccain has a PAID TOP LEVEL ADVISOR taking money from Georgia and that's ok with him...

I wonder if the Obama campaign will ever get tired of hoping (in vain) that the MSM will do what THEY need to be doing. They'd be immune to this kind of thing now if they'd hammered McCain's long and extensive Georgia connection as the character issue that it so blatantly is- allowing hired lobbyists for a foreign government to dictate the foreign policy of a potential President, how unpatriotic is THAT?

user-pic

It's not just the Obama campaign, it's the entire Democratic Party.

Democratic Party = Charlie Brown, Republicans + Traditional Media = Lucy.

Nya nya! I said it first! GMTA

Now if I had more faith in the Obama Camp, one might think this is a trap set for McCain.

An adviser giving advice on a peace agreement? Scandalous. The MSM will not call McSurge's attacks on Obama's patriotism what they are, dishonorable and dishonest, yet the NYT drops this in McCain's lap just as this missile crap is starting anew.

mcsame wants to make Syria an issue ???

guess that georgia thing didn't work out too well

the msm might forget schunaman and georgia

mcsame's campaign in going to be a walking talking JOKE by October

Americans are starting to pay attention, and a lot of repuglitards are lying to zogby

gonna be fun to watch the msm catch up to common wisdon come November

Hey Greg, headline should've been, "Despite the obvious hypocrisy, McCain Campaign Likely To Critize Obama Over Adviser's Visit To Syria."

Or was that just implied?

Or maybe the headline should have been, "Obama continues hammering McCain on taxes, attacks Gramm's 'nation of whiners' comment"

Seriously. I'm not usually one for nagging Greg et al. too much. But are we really covering what McCain might say instead of what Obama is actually saying? Isn't that bordering on parody?

It'll get media play because it is an attack on Obama.

Period.

I think two things will happen:

- McCain will connect this to meeting without preconditions, Iraq withdrawal and Obama's judgement on national security. They will have a nice national security arc connecting McCain's statement to be made tonight to this.

- Burton will take out the well-worn template and issue another yawn-inducing press release that will include the following words: "Amercians are tired of the failed policies... unfortunately... John McCain.... negative campaign"

Yep on both counts, I'm sad to say.

[Reposted from below -- oops]

user-pic

YOu needed to include some "blah, blah, blah"s in the pathologically longwinded Burton response.

I hope Obama won't throw this guy under the bus. Syria's foreign minister has explicitly stated that Syria wants peace with Israel, so it is in everyone's interest to encourage dialogue. Bush and McCain have even opposed Israel's indirect discussions with its neighbor Syria. So Obama should go on the offensive about the need to pursue tough diplomacy versus what we get from McCain, which is ONLY war talk.


The double-talk express is at it again...

McCain's team is pushing us into a war, or--at the very least--a cold war, and he has the audacity to bring up an Obama advisor talked to Syria?

Oh, why not. The media will never, ever, take on John McCain.

The campaign quotes in that Sun article make them seem like they're already scared pussies on the defensive.

Yep on both counts, I'm sad to say.

Maybe its me...but where is the controversy in trying to keep peace among geographical neighbors?

Did Lindsay Grahm (sp?) even go to Georgia? He's been attached to McCain's hip (so to speak) for the past week, as far as I can tell.

Here's hopin' the MSM can step up and call McCain out for his magnificent hypocrisy.

Wake me up when hell freezes over, then I'll start scanning the MSM for such coverage.

It doesn't really matter. If it's not this, it's something else. Remember the waning days of the Dem primaries? Daily Clinton conference calls launching yet another attack, on yet another issue. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take, and the McCain camp knows this. As long as fits into the media narrative for your opponent, the press will probably run with it.

Much as I like the idea of "high road" politics, I'm not an advocate of bringing knives to gunfights. Obama needs surrogates out there NOW, beating McCain over the head with 7 years of Bush failure.

Greg, you were played here. This is an attempt to get the media to push this story "likely going to try and make an issue" without McCain or surrogates having to make the charge. Talking Points Memo earns it's name here, echoing Republican talking points is all.

All this largely negative Obama coverage here lately, is that coming from McCain Camp push points as well?

McCain doesn't want to push this story because they understand the Georgia/Scheunemann blowback, so they want the media to push this story for them so Obama is negatively covered and they can keep their hands clean.

I disagree.

Even if the Obama campaign tries to push back with Georgia, it will still end up with headlines about national security. In effect, repeating McCain's ads is like rerunning them.

Also, I'm hearing that they are working on a parallel attack - on abortion. Because of what Obama said at Warren's, they are connecting that to his vote in Illinois and subsequent denials.

I think they plan to muddy the waters with these votes. I think Obama is correct in his explanation, but I also think that doesn't matter to McCain and Campaign. They'll get their smear in even if it is a bald-faced lie, because the explanation is to technical for people to care about.

user-pic

Daniel Kurtzer is a highly respected diplomat who served as U.S. Ambassador to both Egypt and Israel and served under both CLinton and Bush. This is a non-story. Of course that never stopped the GOP or the media from making mountains out of molehills before.

"It's hard to predict in advance how this will play -- after all, the Obama campaign explicitly said that Kurtzer isn't a paid adviser and isn't authorized to conduct talks with any government. But it's the sort of thing that the McCain campaign might be able to get the media to play up."

The Mccain campaign isn't interested in whether or not it's charges are true, only whether or not they work. The media is only too happy to play along and report every single charge as if it has merit.

I'm beginning to think that the American people will get exactly the government they deserve if they fall for it again!


Perhaps we should start talking about how John McCain eats puppies for breakfast, and likes to strangle kittens before dinner.

user-pic

The Obama camp should tap a tough, smart, witty and unflappable Jewish surrogate to take on Guliani over this effort to interfere with the efforts of our special friend and ally Israel to advance peace in the ME.

I nominate Mark J Green, former Guliani nemesis and current head of Air America, for the job. I've seen him in action on MSNBC and he takes no prisoners; smiling genially while sticking in the shiv.

I think the neocons advising John's campaign may have made a tactical error here as their Likudnik POV is waaaaaaaaaaay off base from what most Americans hope for when it comes to Israel and a more peaceful ME.

If the issue is framed in a manner that asks why John MCCain would oppose Israeli efforts to negotiate agreements with their Syrian neighbor, it could build perception that McCain's advocacy for aggressive militancy is not only dangerous for Americans, but also threatens Israeli lives by blatantly interfering with the peaceseeking ambitions of the only democracy in the ME.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address