« Study: Troops Deployed Abroad Gave Six Times More To Obama Than To McCain | Home | McCain Recycling Hillary's Old Attacks Against Obama »

It's Official: Obama Camp Encouraged Hillary's Name To Be Placed In Nomination

As expected, Obama and Hillary have just released a joint statement confirming that her name will be placed in nomination at the Dem convention.

The key to the statement, though, is this sentence:

Senator Obama's campaign encouraged Senator Clinton's name to be placed in nomination as a show of unity and in recognition of the historic race she ran and the fact that she was the first woman to compete in all of our nation's primary contests.

It was Obama who encouraged Hillary's name to be entered. It's hard to overstate how at odds this is with what pundits such as Maureen Dowd cooked up -- their reckless and outright fictional assertion that the discussion that Hillary's name be entered was proof that she was trying to disrupt the proceedings.

Indeed, Obama advisers only had a problem with Hillary's more vocal supporters. They say they never had any real problem with how Hillary and her advisers handled this.

Their full statement after the jump.


Late Update: Some of you are making the perfectly valid point that it's possible that the statement doesn't really reflect what happened. All I can tell you is that multiple sources on both sides say that any talk of tensions between the two campaigns on this score is vastly inflated and say that the talks were generally harmonious.

The big issue that both sides grappled with together was what to do about her embittered supporters, and even Obama sources insist that the Hillary camp showed a commitment throughout to resolving this in a way that worked best for the Democratic Party and for Obama.

Since June, Senators Obama and Clinton have been working together to ensure a Democratic victory this November. They are both committed to winning back the White House and to to ensuring that the voices of all 35 million people who participated in this historic primary election are respected and heard in Denver. To honor and celebrate these voices and votes, both Senator Obama's and Senator Clinton's names will be placed in nomination. "I am convinced that honoring Senator Clinton's historic campaign in this way will help us celebrate this defining moment in our history and bring the party together in a strong united fashion," said Senator Barack Obama.

Senator Obama's campaign encouraged Senator Clinton's name to be placed in nomination as a show of unity and in recognition of the historic race she ran and the fact that she was the first woman to compete in all of our nation's primary contests.

"With every voice heard and the Party strongly united, we will elect Senator Obama President of the United States and put our nation on the path to peace and prosperity once again," said Senator Hillary Clinton.

Senator Obama and Senator Clinton are looking forward to a convention unified behind Barack Obama as the Party's nominee and to victory this fall for America.


74 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Senator Obama had best be careful. Hillary's CLAIMED to support him all along only to backstab him from the sidelines.

What will he do if her delegates ALL decide to vote for her?

She will never ever get my vote again.

user-pic

How has Hillary Clinton "backstabbed" Obama?

It seems to me that if anyone has "backstabbed" Obama, it's been Clinton's supposed "supporters"--like the woman who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004, but claims she would have voted for Clinton, and now insists on voting for McCain.

Or, perhaps Bill Clinton "backstabbed" Obama, by not enthusiastically saying that Obama was ready to be president.

Of all these entities, Hillary Clinton has been by far the most supportive of Obama.

Blame who you want, but characterizing Clinton in the manner that you did is unfair to Clinton.

And just for the record, I have been an Obama supporter since last year.

hillary is just horrible. we all know shes going to get even less votes during the convention so why doesn't she just come out and say shes not going to be the nominee. this situation is getting more and more depressing.



What Goes on, on the McCain Blog

Everybody needs to relax. This is yet another August nonstory.

I don't recall any convention without some kind of roll call -- whether the outcome was in doubt (or even interesting) or not. Anybody remember '84 with Mondale in his room showing a newspaper with a fake "Mondale Wins" headline (joke on "Dewey Defeats Truman")?

The MSM overblowing (and the ChickenLittleism in these parts) will just boost viewership for a fairly boring pro-forma roll call. State party chairs will make their rambling speeches (hopefully the Chicago folks will keep things somewhat on schedule)... Hillary will get some votes & some praise, blah blah. They'll work out some sort of artificial drama -- maybe they'll have New York put Obama over the top or something. The Clintons will be gracious and rah rah (if only out of political necessity) -- they'll probably spend most of their speeches attacking McCain & Bush.

The only really interesting challenge the Obama campaign will face at the convention will be keeping everything on schedule so the big speeches will be in prime time.

The real story today is Obama crossing the two-million donor threshold. All this other stuff is pure MSM filler.

user-pic

Nice comment, and appreciated.

Senator Obama's campaign encouraged Senator Clinton's name to be placed in nomination as a show of unity and in recognition of the historic race she ran and the fact that she was the first woman to compete in all of our nation's primary contests.

It's depressing to imagine the amount of time that probably went into writing and revising this sentence.

user-pic

Greg, you don't have to keep after Dowd, no one takes her seriously.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

I'm glad it was worded this way, but that doesn't mean that's what really happened.

Once again; Obama has showed leadership and conviction to bring all factions together in a spirit of unity! How will the MSM spin this story? anyone care to guess?

How will the MSM spin this story? anyone care to guess?

Obama caved in to Clinton's demands, and if he can't stand-up to her, how can he stand-up to (fill in name of foreign leader)?

user-pic

"Reckless" and "fictional".

Great adjectives for Dowd's "work".

user-pic

The convention will be ALL ABOUT HILLARY -- leaving Obama in the back.

Shame on Hillary and her supporters for risking losing this election because of this crap!

I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to hear that the media establishment has been manufacturing drama for its own gain.

Obama as always has shown grace under pressure and wisdom. I believe it will work out for him.

user-pic

What next - the offer of VP?

Would she like a room next to his in the White House too?

My God. This woman and her supporters don't give a hoot about the Party and winning in NOV, it's all about HER and Bill's legacy and future.

Well - if he loses because of all these demands and helping McCain with his campaign slogans -- she will never get nominated for another job. I'm sure of it.

Isnt this caving in on her wishes. I think the media will portray him as weak.

The media was going to focus on the Clintons and the angry supportors of Hilliary regardless of what was decided. Obama now can say he letting them have their say and their voices heard.

I find it hard to believe that there are undecideds out there that will think, "hmmmm, Obama seems the better candidate, but, gee, those Clinton supportors seem real angry. I guess I'll vote for McCain."

Now what is a PUMA to do?

user-pic

I wouldn't be a bit surprised to hear that behind the scenes the Clintons have gotten their delegates to come BACK over to her, then she convinced Obama that it was JUST for appearance sake to have her name on the rollcall --- only to find out that SHE'S won instead of him.

I hope he has something in WRITING from her.

user-pic

You sound paranoid. Seriously.

the folks in the obama camp have allowed the convention to become all about the clintons, i hope they know what they're doing with this. the idiot talking heads will jump all over this to do what they always wanted, which is rehash the drama of the hill & bill show, it's just much easier now. there obviously had to be some compromise made, but increasingly i just wish somebody over there would tell the clintons to suck it up and get over themselves.

The Clintons is just something Obama has learned to live with, I think, as long as they say the right things.

In the end, I believe it will be Obama's acceptance speech that will resonate after the convention is over. What anyone else, including the Clintons, said during the convention will be overshadowed.

user-pic

The Clintons may out shine all in the room, untill the moment tht Obama enters. I think having both of them speak before he does will make an excelent contrast. Do not under estimate him.

I am glad to see this and believe it sounds believable. It's going to be a great thundering convention that may put the fear of the people into the Republicans.

user-pic

Moja31 -- I agree 100%

"It was Obama who encouraged Hillary's name to be entered."

The Soviet Union used to publish "reliable accounts" like this.

user-pic

I hate like heck to hear what else he's had to promise her and Bill.

You know, people are going after McCain and the lobbyists he'll have to answer to if he wins, well, what are the Clintons' doing to Obama? What will he owe them?

By the way, I'm still voting for HIM. I'm sadden that he's been forced somehow to bow down to her and Bill.

I use to love these people - no more.

Sounds like a good arrangement. The Hillarites will hear her urge them to vote for Obama. Those who do are real Democrats who backed her for the right reasons and now are turning their loyalty and efforts to electing the Democratic nominee, Barack Obama. Those who don't are exposed as dittoheads who crashed the Democratic process to sow chaos, and who would have voted Republican in the GE no matter which Democrat won the primary.

Now we will get a head count and see just how legit her primary efforts really were.

user-pic

Er, no. Those people do exist, but they're not convention delegates. It's just not that easy to become a delegate, regardless of the tales that Rush spun about it.

user-pic

Am I wrong to be thinking that there's been a trap laid in Obama's path?

I really want to believe this is all settled, I really do. It's sad that I've pretty much stopped trusting the Clintons altogether.

user-pic

I do not trust her but she is no super villain. She cannot steal the election and the delegates ore not going to give it to her.

I don't think it's all about the Clintons. Hillary deserved a key speaking role given the primary battle. Bill is a former President.

Mark Warner was given the keynote address, and unless there is some big swerve here, a Clinton isn't going to be the VP.

She's getting a floor vote. There could be some tense moments before the totals are read, I'll admit that, because I don't really trust her (but that could be on me). I have to imagine that the vast majority of super-delegates will vote for Obama just to ensure against any funny business. One has to hope that most of her pledged delegates heed her call and vote Obama as well. The more votes Hillary gets the worse it will look for Barack. And by making it largely ceremonial, I think a lot of Clinton pledged delegates will still vote for her to "send a message" not to Obama, but to Hillary.

How this works will depend on how emphatically and convincingly Hillary asks her delegates to vote for Barack Obama.

"There could be some tense moments before the totals are read, I'll admit that, because I don't really trust her"

Good for you, Jonze! THe first step is indeed recognizing that there is a problem! ;-)

there will probably also be the small handful of diehards who will feel that hillary has been betrayed by those delegates that do switch their votes for the good of the party. unfortunately these also happen to be the folks that the idiots in the media love to find, and use as poster children for their so called hard hitting journalistic abilities.

user-pic

Nothing like telling the voters in America that the Democrats aren't even sure who they want to be President - so why should they be?

user-pic

Or, alternatively, nothing like showing the voters of American how groundbreaking the Democratic Party actually is.

The media will be all over this like flies on sh%t, pushing the same themes you've been pushing throuhgout this thread: that Clinton can't be trusted.

It will focus attention the convention, and people will tune in, to see a united Democratic Party nominating Barack Obama for president, followed by the barn burner of a speech he will undoubtely give.

Seems like a win-win situation to me.

Clinton isn't going to get the nomination in some sort of backroom coup. Her political future would be over with instantaneously, and she and her supporters know it.

As for the diehard Clinton "supporters", Obama's speech in a 75000 seat stadium will allow any boos to be completely drowned out.

I think all this speculation and worry over what Clinton will do, or won't do, is a new version of Chicken Littlism that so afflicts Democratic supporters.

Well said.

And her political future would take a step back if she comes across as intentionally hurting his chances in November.

Most Americans see the angry Clinton supportors for what they are.

user-pic

You haven't SEEN her intentions yet????

I'm with you, CT (which is not unusual for me). Speaking as another someone who lost a great deal of respect for the Clintons during the primary, Hillary in particular has done alot to regain that respect lately. Maybe she now knows the path to her future greatness is through a Democratic revival over the next 8 years, with Obama in the White House and her taking the lead in the Senate. Forget Bill, he is just an angry old man at this point.

She's got plenty of fight left for 2016

user-pic

We've been told over and over again NOT TO WORRY about Hillary --- well, each time she's been able to cause just one more media storm after another.

They are NOT to be trusted...period.

P.S.
I voted for Bill twice -- I'm sorry I did now.

user-pic

I understood your concern, but the media is actively pushing this theme of Clinton not being supportive, and you can bet that if a reporter is in a crowd of 100 Clinton supporters, 99 of them who actively want Obama to win, the reporter will focus on that one lone holdout.

Don't be swayed by that.

They know what kinds of stories grab audiences' attentions. Not the ones with headlines like "All Dems Played Nicey-Nice Today."

It's okay, I voted for Bush twice...I win the dumb award! (but you come in a close 2nd!) :-)

Can you really see a scenario where the superdelegates would flip now? Wouldn't the Democratic party blow up on the spot?

Obama has a huge number of incredible qualities, his pragmatism, his ability to do the "c" word (shhh! compromise)and in spite of allegations to the contrary, an ego not so large that he has to have the limelight all to himself (can you even IMAGINE the Clinton's being so gracious?)

I don't see this as being wussy or caving to the Clinton's, but rather sucking it up and doing what is best for the party and the country...

But don't get me wrong, I don't trust the Clinton's any further than I can throw them, and I'll be holding my breath during that roll call...hope it goes fast.

Hopefully this move will resolve any ill will in the party so that we can move on with the fall election. What is clear by this move is that Hillary will not be the vice presidential nominee in the end.

The real test for Hillary is whether or not she comes out of the convention strongly squashing any remaining PUMA type attitude among her supporters. Yes, she has been personally supportive of Obama recently, but she has not showed any real leadership in tamping down the nomination hopes of her supporters.

Look at our own Billy Glad. Billy recently stated that he needed to make a choice and that he was now choosing to support Obama. He was even going to be active in the election effort. Then, just about the time of that video showing Hillary talking about Catharsis, Billy seemed to backslide. Coincidence?

user-pic

BillyBoy27 - how does this prove she won't be VP? In fact, we were initially told she would be keynote speaker on Tuesday only to find out the Mark Warner will be instead --- what does THAT mean?

user-pic

We weren't initially told anything about keynote speakers, coonsey. It was conspicuously absent from the lineup: the keynote speaker.

And why would a Veep pick speak twice at a convention?

user-pic

All this serves to do is make Hillary supporters even MORE hopeful and encouraged to keep fighting so that Obama loses in Nov, so that THEIR girl can run in 2012.

user-pic

Falling hook line and sinker for the media meme.

user-pic

CT Voter,

If you are talking to me -- I'm seeing REALITY, nothing to do with what the media says.

It's right in front of our faces what she is doing.

user-pic

I'm just curious as to why you continue to ascribe so much power to Clinton.

And, when you talk about seeing "what she has done", or words to that effect, could you be more specific? Are you referring to the rally in Nevada last Friday, for instance?

If Obama loses this election, no matter what Clinton does, she'll be held partially responsible the loss, so it is in her political self-interests to do everything she can to make sure he is elected. Second, after Bill Clinton's multiple implosions on the primary trail this year, I would imagine people have real second thoughts about Hillary's candidacy, no matter how this election turns out.

I think the Clintons have more power in the media's perceptions than they actually do in reality.

Too much CAFFEINE or something?

More like too much FOX News in the '90s.

But, actually, what is the downside of being gracious to her? The only one I can see is the rather far-fetched prospect that she would try to carry out one of these 'sneak in and steal the election' scenarios which, even for the Clintons, is highly improbable and unlikely to work in any event.

Otherwise
-- it's as easy to spin it as the graciousness of someone fully and comfortably in power as it is a weak caving in,
-- his supporters are going to be for him whichever way this went,
-- he'll win over some of her supporters by being gracious,
-- if the ones he doesn't win over want to be ugly and make trouble then Clinton, not Obama, is going to be the one who looks weak,
-- the focus on women's issues will give ample opportunity to talk about McCain being anti-choice and the tenuousness of the Sup Ct. situation,
-- (believe it or not) there are a lot of older people (e.g., the ones most suspicious of Obama) who would really, truly resent it if the 'new kid' dismantled that most ridiculous but still cherished by some institution of the roll call of the States. Seriously. (If you don't understand, just wait until you are older and something you found wonderous and exciting as a youth is threatened) and
-- the extra drama and possibility, however remote, of a last minute coup, leaving blood and guts all over the convention floor, will pull in a bigger audience of independents and Republicans than would ordinarily watch ... maybe they'll actually listen to some of what's said and get their interest piqued.

So if you HAVE to have a roll call (and I suspect that was a given) then there are only two choices: one without her name in contention with the delegates free to make all the trouble and express all the anger they want, esp at such "censorship" -- or -- one where she has been given the full ceremony of being nominated, seconded, etc. and she herself is saying "give your votes to Obama" (so kicking up a fuss in that situation will just make their candidate look bad).

I think that, once again, the Obama folks have thought ahead and thought through the matter and come up with really the best solution -- in this case the one that is going to go over best with lukewarm Clinton supporters and get more Republicans and independents to watch.

NOW ..... I hope they just do as well picking the VP nominee!!

Obama/Biden '08 (not that I'm biased or anything)

user-pic

Like you, I see an upside to this for both Obama and the Democratic Party at large.

I think this comment needs it's own blog/diary/whatever we're calling them these days!

Great analysis! I know you can't officially rec a comment, but I do, anyway!

I had the same feeling about CT's comment.... That will be a tough one for the Media to digest. Democratic Unity? Huh?

But where's the massive Hillary contingent booing Obama off the stage? Where's the secret plan to force her onto the ticket?

What is this? Democratic Unity????

Okay, Elizabeth, I'll agree with you. There is no downside for Obama. I have to look at two things. First - I cannot believe the Democratic Party would not have let Obama campaign as he has since the last primary if there was any chance of Senator Clinton "stealing" the election. I also think this will be the Clintons last hurrah. I also have to trust Obama knows what he is doing. So far he has come out on top at every turn. This will be a way of folding the Pumas into the party and smothering their voices. Sometimes this is called "embracing the tiger". The media can say what ever they want about the situation. Obama looks good.

I'm seeing it a little differently...rather than "smothering" their voices, I'm hoping they'll just burn themselves out...At some time don't they just have to concede defeat and shut the heck up on their own accord?

You are right - smothering is not quite the word I should have used - I was thinking of incorporating, encompassing, taking a part into the whole.
But after watching the Hardball clip with the PUMA and JUST SAY NO DEAL reps smothering would probably be a better word. Those two were pertty sad reps to go on msm with - would've thought they had someone better - more quick witted and better spoken.

This is exactly on point. There will be shril analysis about a possible coup and did Obama cave, etc. during the convention. By the day after Obama's acceptance speech, all of this intrigue will be forgotten. It will have served its purpose of ginning up the turnout (viewership) and the Dems we be pretty damn united as the Repubs start their (yawn) convention.

user-pic

This CAVE will only serve to give HER supporters even MORE reason to keep fighting against HIS campaign and help him to lose in Nov so that SHE can run again in 2012.

She and Bill are playing GOOD COP - BAD COP

Why can't you see that?

Not to be indelicate, but a lot of those supporters will either have passed on to their great reward, or be in full scale dementia by then...

Those of us who are left (if there are any after McCain gets WWIII in full swing) will surely remember this and fight like H-E-double toothpicks to make sure another yet-to-be-named candidate wins the primary.

Yippy...this news means for certain HRC will not be the Vice Presidential nominee. wweeeee...haaaaa

user-pic
Indeed, Obama advisers only had a problem with Hillary's more vocal supporters. They say they never had any real problem with how Hillary and her advisers handled this.

This sounds in line with what I've heard from the Clinton supporters I know. At our state convention, I was talking to the top Clinton volunteer in our area, and she was very concerned about Clinton dead-enders causing problems at the convention. She was elected to go to Denver as a Clinton delegate, and is hard at work for Obama now. Like almost all delegates, she's a dedicated Democrat first, not part of some cult of personality.

Coonsey is trolling the shit out of this thread.

I was thoroughly disgusted with how Clinton ran her campaign the first half of this year, but ever since she conceded I'm convinced she is doing and will continue to do the right thing. She's not stupid. She has a political career and if there is any talk at all that she didn't do her best to elect Obama that career would be over promptly. Obama's not stupid either, he knows he needs her supporters and putting her name in nomination is clearly the right and respectful thing to do. If he is elected, I think that they will be a powerful duo in governing. And, I'm not 100% convinced she won't wind up on the ticket with him.

I'll just say "ditto" to timbo212's first sentence, and I started from a very low point in my view of her. I'm positive and impressed with the way she has handled things since conceding.

But as to the last sentence, NEVER. And not because of Hillary (I'm coming to think she could be a good VP) but because of Bill ...... he's too 'present,' too out of control, and too undisciplined and petulant to have "sitting around the breakfast table at the White House" as someone on one of these blogs put it.

I'm coming to believe that Hillary truly wants Obama to win, not only because it would certainly be best for the country but because it puts an end - forever - to Bill's or Billary's plans for her ..... leaving the way open, for the first time in her life, for Hillary's OWN plans and her OWN achievements! It cculd be very interesting to watch what happens next with her.

It really doesn't matter if Hilary's name is put in roll call. The Democratic party can definitely win with Obama, but yes they can lose. But at this point, if the Democratic party are such a stupid bunch of whiners, handwringers, and chicken littles that they will replace Hilary with Obama, then they WILL LOSE, and they will have deserved to lose, so aside from theatrics, this is a non-story.

Not content to make himself Putin's ButtBoy your Lawn Jockey in Chief is now taking it up the ass from Hillary!
Again!
Can't wait to see the pics of him doing BreckBoy...
W
H
A
D
D
A

P
U
N
K
!


There have been a ton of stories lately about Barack not being able to push through--to deliver. There are people out there who recognize that Barack Obama is brilliant, with a level temperment, and a shrewd ability, a prescience, and a winning personality--a man who can rescue the United States from the perilous course she is on---but these people can't seem to get beyond the fact that Barack Obama is black. This was discussed on the Sunday News shows and nobody had an answer for it. In a moment of hysteria at the Convention, Hillary can give these people an out. Something can happen to overshadow Barack's being our next President. The World is in chaos right now, so nothing is sacred. God Bless Barack and Michelle.

I may depart from many of you. But for the sake of unity at the convention I think it is a good idea. Hillary will in fact release her delegates (seemingly) and lead the way for her hardcore fans to get behind the Democrat.

Now, some will never come back and vote Obama, that is their problem. What if Obama wins, what will these people do, commit suicide?

Obama has a higher chance of winning than McCain we see this in the pattern, even if some weeks the race gets closer or wider, the basic pattern has been there from the start and Obama will not be swiftboated without a fight, he's already fighting.

So what will these Obama haters do if he wins? Move, kill themselves, kill him...of course I am dramatizing, but I think they better get therapy now, because their nightmare (and the dream of many of us) may come true.

Stop panicking about this is Hillary's convention, BS. One night will highlight Hillary and her historic run, after that it is Obama's party.

And like someone said above, it is Obama's speech that will be remembered by the end of the convention, it will be great and millions will have goosebumps...end of story, now let's win.

And no she will not be the VP, this is pretty clear if you work by process of elimination. Biden or Wesley Clark will be it...unless it is a complete unknown out of the blue.

Was this thread compiled in an opium den that had WiFi? But for CT voter and other rare exceptions, you people sound delusional.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address