« Focus Group: Undecided Voters Care Much More About Character Than Issues | Home | Obama Response Ad Ties Ayers Swift-Boating Spot Directly To McCain »

Swift-Boat Group Sinks Nearly $3 Million Into Ad Tying Obama To Ayers

The other day, the independent Swift-Boating outfit American Issues Project vowed to plunk down a cool $2.8 million on a slimy and vicious ad tying Obama to former Weatherman Bill Ayers.

Such vows often can be mere bluster designed to get free media and gin up contributions. Not this time, however.

The FEC report from the group is in, and it confirms that the group did in fact plunk down the nearly $3 million to air the ad.

That's a sizable buy. Meanwhile, Evan Tracey, who tracks national ad campaigns for the Campaign Media Analysis Group, confirms to me that the spot is running in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

This ad, in short, matters. The Obama campaign apparently realizes this too: They have a response ad up in Ohio that hasn't been released yet.

In other words, the spot tying Obama to Ayers is the real deal -- the first wave of the Swift-Boating that has yet to materialize in earnest.


Late Update: Tracey posts Obama's response ad for you to watch right here.


94 Comments

| Leave a comment

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR MCCAIN!!!

How's the spam tasting?

Idiotic is our friend.

user-pic

Running this ad in MI and PA is a waste of money.  OH and VA, maybe not.  Rebutting it in OH makes sense.

In any event, I can't see this issue getting much traction.  Especially not during the Dem convention.

user-pic

Don't kid yourself.

This stuff must be rebutted with force and haste.

The "celebrity" tripe is chickenshit compared to this stuff. How Obama responds will go some way towards determining if he's the next President.

For once I agree with you. The last sentence may be a tad hyberbolic. But then again, it may not, which is why we have to respond.

On up side, this doesn't have any of the he-said, but-he-said truth must be in the middle and there's lots of complicated details so there must be something to it problem that made the SBVT filth so sticky.

user-pic

I agree. But do they really want to start grabbing everyone that the candidates have peripherally known? This can cut both ways and become really boring (or, I'll admit) confusing for the electorate where these ads run.

Unfortunately, the ad is a bit too begging you to understand rather than being forceful. Like stating McCain should realize than Obama was only 8 years old when Ayers's committed his crimes. How can you hold a 8 year old responsible 40 years later?

Ion:

Obama's ad response is strong but:
a) will he release it to the media so he can get free exposure like McCain does?
b) will the media run it or just run the attacks on Obama like they've been doing so far?

Rob

user-pic

(a) I hope he already has

(b) that doesn't seem to be their MO, does it?

Maybe if Obama initiate a line of character attack on McCain, he'll get the type of free coverage that McCain typically does.

The Chalabi thing below isn't a bad idea, but the Keating 5 as a tie-in with the current mortgage crisis and McCain's role in both really cuts to the quick.

user-pic
In any event, I can't see this issue getting much traction. Especially not during the Dem convention.

This was pretty much the Kerry campaign's attitude, as well.

user-pic
Especially not during the Dem convention.

I think I read more into the post than was there.  Greg didn't say when the ad would run, just that time had been bought.

To be sure, I think rebutting this thing in OH and VA makes sense.  And their rebuttal ad does seem pretty good.

I still can't see this ad making much of a difference in MI and PA.

Also, a counter-attack in those states might be better than a rebuttal.  Just my intuition, though.

How about a response ad, in the exact same format, linking McCain to Chalabi, mentioning the facts:
* Chalabi’s cousin provided much of the fake intelligence that Bush used to justify the invasion.
* Chalabi was a convicted of bank fraud in Jordan and had been ruled unreliable by the State department and CIA
* Chalabi led us into this war and then was caught spying for Iran. He caused the largest security breach of the war: notifying the Iranians that we had cracked their communication code.
* In Iraq he has been accused of counterfeiting and his nephew has been indicted for murder related to ethnic cleansing.

And then list all the praise and political assistance that McCain has heaped on Chalabi over the years.

Boo Lala:

Brilliant! Why aren't you running the Quick Response Team?

Rob

user-pic

I like it.

Trouble is, there are sooo many similar counter-attacks possible that it's hard to know which are the one or two best ones to run with.

FWIW, the Obama response ad sure came quickly.  I'm inclined to believe they've got a decent arsenal already in the can.  Either that, or they're a lot better than I can imagine!

"In any event, I can't see this issue getting much traction."

Talk about Famous Last Words. Just ask John Kerry (and, before him, Michael Dukakis) about scurilous charges and innuendo "not getting any traction." This stuff works, and that's why the Rethuglicans continue to do it. The only effective response is to rebut and attack.

First thing this morning, I had "Morning Joe" (unfortunately) on MSNBC on the TV, and I had to listen to these idiots, Mike Barnicle especially, carry on about how Obama's poll results have gone down because the more people turn to the race the more they want details, answers, information, and Obama just has no "specificity" in his campaign. Barnicle carried on and on about "specificity."

Nothing of course was said about McCain. HOW ABOUT ASKING FOR SOME GODDAMN FUCKING SPECIFICITY FROM MCCAIN???!!!

McCain was asked specifics when he was at that Hanoi Hilton.

user-pic

And by all accounts provided them while the cameras rolled.

user-pic

I haven't seen Obama "work the refs" like McCain and Clinton, although it seemed to work for them.

Maybe now is the time for Team Obama to call out the MSM for it's failure to scrutinize McCain's positions and the alarming lack of policy detail he's provided to date.

The Obama counter ad is VERY good. Ties McCain directly to the negative ad and tethers him to sleazy politics. Then punches him around a bit on Iraq and the economy. MORE LIKE THAT, PLEASE, OBAMA CAMP. kthxbai.

user-pic

Co-sign. Make a matching buy everywhere that smear ad is running. Point out the utter stupidity of trying to tie a radical to an 8-year-old boy.

Make McCain explain why he's 'talking about the Sixties.' (Good question, too.)

No question about it. The response ad needs to be unleashed on the same media markets, especially OH, as quickly as possible.

user-pic

I'll second that. Nice response ad and it hits McCain camp for distracting from real issues with irrelevant nonsense.

user-pic

"Ties McCain directly to the negative ad and tethers him to sleazy politics."

Exactly. That's key. Obama's camp responded as if the ad came directly from the McCain campaign - which, of course, it did but that's another story.

user-pic

I want to know the names of everyone who contributed.

Is there a way to find out?

I think they had to file the list of donors with the FEC. One of them is a billionare out of Texas.

user-pic

WHO?

I really want the name of the Texas billionaire.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-simmons23-2008aug23,0,7963392.story

Texas billionaire Harold Simmons, who helped pay for the devastating attacks on the military record of Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kerry in 2004, has paid for a television ad that assails Barack Obama over his ties to a founder of a violent radical group.

Simmons, who is also a major fundraiser for John McCain, donated $2.87 million that a newly formed nonprofit group, the American Issues Project, has used for the ad, a report filed Friday with the Federal Election Commission shows.

Jonze:

Another reason to hate Texas. Just got back from San Antonio this weekend - what a cesspool of ignorance, strip malls, GMC Suburbans and Fox News-quoting rednecks.

Rob

user-pic

"GMC Suburbans and Fox News-quoting rednecks."
You sure you weren't down here in GA? I guess it would've been Ford F-150's.

I really want Tena to have the name of the Texas billionaire.

Obama should point this out, that a big pharm billionaire is running the ad and then make his counter ad about healthcare.

user-pic

Yup.

T. Boone Pickens financed SwiftBoat against Kerry.

Now the big oil man is running Clean Energy Fuels Corp. Nancy Pelosi and her husband have invested $100,000 into his company.

And he would be a major beneficiary of the new legislation on clean energy that Nancy is pushing for.

Just saying.

I'd suggest you invest in a company pushing renewable energy as well. It's not a bad investment in light of the push from BOTH sides of the aisle to invest him renewable energy.

Just saying...

I'd wait until Harold Simmons comes up with a nice eco-friendly business venture in time for the next election.

user-pic

Lalo's onto something here.

Pickens' ads are replete with references to windmills, but he's at least as focused on natural gas as a solution to the energy crisis.

After years of fighting to keep wind and solar off the agenda in Washington, he's not investing millions of dollars in an ad campaign for philanthropic purposes. The Pelosi connection is a legitimate cause for concern.

How about asking McSame if he approves of the lyrics of El Cartel Daddy Yankee?!?!

Why isn't there an equivalent group on the left to fight fire with fire? Why make the Obama campaign waste money responding to this bullshit?

And who's going to be out there holding McCain accountable for what these scumbags are doing on his behalf?

Because Obama, in an act of probably excessive confidence and honor, asked those groups to stand down. That worried me at the time, and worries me even more now that the GOP *hit machine is getting fully cranked up.

Don't you read the newspapers? Obama has asked the DOJ to look into Harold Simmons to stop his freedom of speech.

user-pic

Ah shit - you can't find out who it is. Dammit I want to know -

user-pic

From Ben Smith, August 22, 2008:

The spokesman for the American Issues Project, the independent group whose ad is the most negative of the cycle and links Obama to terrorism, says the group just filed a report naming its sole donor.

The donor, spokesman Christian Pinkston said, is Dallas billionaire Harold Simmons, who made his first fortune in chain pharmacies and is now listed as the 73rd richest person in the world, with a net worth estimated by Forbes at $2.1 billion.

Simmons, a major Republican donor, gave maximum $2,300 contributions to Senator John McCain last year, as well as to former Governor Mitt Romney and to former Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

He's listed as a bundler for the McCain campaign on McCain's website, which says he's raised between $50,000 and $100,000 for the Republican candidate.

Link: Dallas billionaire, McCain donor and bundler

user-pic

I thought there were concerns about the legality of this ad?

Yeah, there were. They'll be resolved in 2010, probably.

user-pic

if they're not concerned with things like "facts" and "truth" what makes you think they'd be concerned with something as trivial as the law?

and besides, as attorney general mukasey says. "Not every violation of the law is a crime."

user-pic

I love the fact that the Obama campaign rather quickly responded to this with a response ad actually coming from the candidate himself. And it treats McCain's/the wingers' attacks as silly and out of touch with the concerns of today's voters. And it them talks about the positives Obama will bring, closing with yet another image of McCain and his BFF. I hope they air it in more than just Ohio.

Seriously, it took a lot of balls for the campaign to actually include an image of Ayers and called him a "radical". Actually, it doesn't take a lot of balls - it's just common sense. Haven't seen stuff like this from the Dems in a while. I like.

Game fuckin on.
Look at how the "celebrity" meme got reflected like it hit a jedi lightsaber.
Another barakarate chop is comin behind this shit for sure.

Reminder for all PUMAS and other HRC supporters:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/25/115715/026/957/574683

Texas billionaire Harold Simmons, who helped pay for the devastating attacks on the military record of Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kerry in 2004, has paid for a television ad that assails Barack Obama over his ties to a founder of a violent radical group.

Simmons, who is also a major fundraiser for John McCain, donated $2.87 million that a newly formed nonprofit group, the American Issues Project, has used for the ad, a report filed Friday with the Federal Election Commission shows.

This guy made his billions in owning pharmacies - Obama should use this as an attack point against McCain. Big Pharm is running attack ads for McCain because McCain and the current broken helthcare system that McCain plans to continue is reason why this backker is a billionaire and why the middle class and senior citizens struggle to be able to afford necessary prescriptions.

user-pic

Ah shit.


thanks Jonze.

McCain is going to have to come out and denounce this ad, which will effectively neutralize it. And I like the idea of talking about the billionaire pharma guy in the context of health care.

Folks, if we want to be able to fight this shit, Obama and Biden are going to need MONEY.

Donate if you can.

Seconded. I've been trying not to do it -- trying to convince myself they don't need it -- but it's time for more $$$ tonight, I think.

You know, I am beginning to really, really, really dislike the Republican party.

I mean really.

user-pic
McCain is going to have to come out and denounce this ad, which will effectively neutralize it.

I find your comments to be insightful, thoughtful, and hilarious. This one? Are you high?

And thanks for the reminder to donate. Just did.

Yeah, he's not going to denounce this ad. "Many people have concerns" blah blah blah.

Probably still coming off my Biden high.

And I just donated again, with the knowledge that I'm going to have to again in a few days (Thursday should be a huge day for the campaign).

user-pic

well...we're still waiting for mccain to denounce the corsi book...

so i wouldn't hold my breath

AMEN!!! going to donate more right now

Nice response ad (especially since it ignores the swiftboat front "group" and goes right after McGigolo), and I especially like that everything coming out of the campaign these days paints McGigolo as a continuation of Shrub.

Yeah, that was smart. Let McCain splutter that he didn't fund the ad. Then we talk about who exactly *did* fund the ad, and about his degree of connection to McCain. Let's have that conversation.

The key is to attack the financial backers and out them for their obvious self-interest. Like Boone Pickens four years ago - an oil man financing a smear campaign against Kerry to keep Big Oil friendly Bush in the White House.

Now you have Big Pharm Harold Simmons financing a smear against Obama that has nothing to do with the election on hand, but John McCain will keep the broken healthcare system in place, which allowed Mr. Simmons to make his billions.

Expose the blatant self-interest of these people and use them to attack McCain.

This would be the PERFECT time to unleash a health care attack. Seniors having to choose between prescription medication or food and Harold Simmons is running attack ads for John McCain in order to get McCain elected and keep the status quo.

That is how you hit back.

That is bringing a gun to a knife fight.

Agreed.

user-pic

I really like the idea of going after the backer. Hit the sob where he lives. Hit him hard. The only reason Simmons is spending the money is that he thinks he can hit without taking any return fire. Obama should run the ad aimed at linking the smear to McCain. Thanks to Halperin's comment yesterday that won't be hard.

MoveOn should move on Simmons.

Right. That part is better not done by the campaign itself. They are absolutely right to go straight for McCain.

Hit the backer, but also tie them to McCain. Make it a two for one.

The Dems should run adds identifying every one of the donors to these smear campaigns, and a few more ads listing every indicted GOP pol and operative. Unfortunately, Dems still may not know how to fight back effectively. (That's a problem for people who are fundametally decent. The GOP suffers no such impairment.) It took Dems forever to figure out what they were up against. By now it should be obvious - they have to fight fire with napalm, and seriously kick some GOP ass.

I can't envision a better response from Obama. The key is to repeat it often.

Where is health care as an issue? Does Obama believe it to be a loser for him to talk about? There is a great article in today's Toledo Blade that details how insurance companies run interference challenging orders by doctors for their patients forcing less expensive, secondary options. http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080825/NEWS32/106232154

"Slimy"?! Nothing incorrect about the ad. The "vicious" truth hurts but Obama has around 20 years with Ayers--who he worked for, who helped launch his political career, and much more. Ayers is not, as Obama lied, just someone who lived in the neighborhood. Maybe not a friend but definitely not a stranger.

Hey Sean, can I get your autograph?

So sell that BS somewhere else, troll.

It's pretty damn perverse that health insurance companies rather you die because it is better for their bottom line, and will look for any way possible not to cover you.

"When you signed up for our insurance policy you stated that you hadn't had any medical tests within the last year. However our records show that you did in fact have your blood pressure checked as part of a routine doctors visit only three months before coming here. Since you lied on the form, our contract is null and void. You're uninsured and on your own. Sure you can sue us, but it will take years and years and we have so much more money than you you're out of luck sucker."

Absofuckinglutely. Obama's response should name NAMES and challenge McSame to ignore or DENOUNCE these sleazeballs.

Matthew Weaver, I am much handsomer than you.

How do I know? I know.

Time for some Dem 527s to unleash some fury of their own. I sure hope Obama's attempts to quash any 527s on our side doesn't end up being the big mistake of the campaign.

I am waiting for the general election to commence to donate more money to Senator Obama. I highly doubt that McCain will denounce anything that comes out from here on. What did he say about Corsi's book... we have to have a sense of humor ... or something like that.

I think it is a big mistake to pretend these ads don't work. It sucks but they do. The Obama camp will have to be incredibly vigilant in 'catching these fouls' so they are 'outs' instead of 'base hite' or 'home runs'. Sucks that anyone can just hit a ball on the field anytime, anywhere...

when Clark made his comment that being a POW does not necessarily imbue McCain with the judgment or command experience of a Commander in Chief, the McCain campaign immediately and emphatically pinned those comments on the Obama camp.

Is there some reason why the Obama response does not say that this is a McCain attack? Why do Republicans always have a green light to attack and Dems have to get a permission card before they do?

Because McCain is only worried about getting elected. Obama is worried about leading if he gets elected. McCain wins the election and we'll have four more years of partisan politics with nothing getting done.

McCain wants to lead, but how does he expect to lead when half the country and the majority in the House and Senate saw him only win by taking his campaign into the gutter?

This was one benefit of bringing Biden aboard his ticket - Biden is very respected and liked inside Washington. You smear him and people will get pissed off and hold it against you.

Obama campaign:

hit them, hit them, hit them! Don't make it cerebral, or complicated. Don't try to draw some web of connections that's difficult to understand (like the trail of funding behind the 527s.)

Hit them with Chalabi, hit them with Ralph Reed, hit them with any smarmy person McCain has ever been in the same ROOM as. Hit them with how out of touch he is, how angry, how doddering.

Undecided voters won't respond to intellectualisms. They'll respond to gut-instinct "with us or against" us kinds of logic. It may be difficult to swallow, but until the Obama campaign gets a little vicious, this thing is going to get worse.

Good, I like Obama's response, he needed to address the smear linking him to Ayers with the McCain camp insinuating Senator Obama CURRENTLY hangs out with terrorists. What nonsense.

But what the McCain camp does not realize is this is a new kind of election, the Obama campaign has utilized the Internet to generate MILLIONS of new voters and with those new voters comes knowledge, knowledge of how to research truth from lies, and as someone that lives in Michigan where the McCain smear ad against Obama is currently running, I had to laugh when I first saw it (seriously) because I know how to utilize an Internet and I have known the truth about Bill Ayers and his radical PAST for some time, I also know his current position which is a respected University professor. In my opinion, the McCain camp in way underestimating the power of the Internet where the truth can easily be found.

The American Issues Project is still a 501(c)4, right? How is this not illegal?

""Slimy"?! Nothing incorrect about the ad. The "vicious" truth hurts but Obama has around 20 years with Ayers--who he worked for, who helped launch his political career, and much more. Ayers is not, as Obama lied, just someone who lived in the neighborhood. Maybe not a friend but definitely not a stranger."

Hey Matthew Weaver, as I said in my above post maybe you are one of those that should utilize the Internet to do a little research. It won't take you long and what you will find is how Sean Hannity goes on national television night after night telling lies to the American people when he says Ayers comments about "he didn't do enough", and "I don't regret setting bombs" were NOT made on 9/11, but Hannity insinuates they were when he knows full well those comments were in response to questions he gave in an interview regarding his memoirs of him protesting the United States invasion of Vietnam. And I might remind you that Ayers actions were well over thirty years ago. Ayers also condemned the September 11th terrorist attacks. Just a little information you don't seem to "get".

user-pic

Time to resurrect a famous Ad: Where's The Beef? and use it against McCain. And ask the public: If you can only run negative Ads against your opponent, what's that say about what you have to offer the American public.

Let's pay close attention, friends, to what both Obama and McCain say that's specific in their speeches. Not just slogans and/or shallow talking points.

user-pic

Wanna know why those smear attacks work? Why the GOP keeps doing it....check out this focus group and what it considers "important", and keeping in mind they base their opinions on what they see on TV....This is probably mainly seniors, since it was sponsored by AARP - and, no, Frank Luntz didn't manipulate them. This all too often the case with many American voters...
to our shame as a country:

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/08/focused.html

user-pic

I love this video piece, Chris Matthews getting a pledge from McCain to denounce vicious 527 attacks....this needs to be run in the battleground states - purchase time IMMEDIATELY after the Ayers attack Ad....and ask, Senator, is this still your position? Or did it change when Karl Rove's chief deputy became your campaign director? It's time to stop the dirty divisive politics here and now, and talk about the real issues! (that would be my
tag line to it)......

The Ayers ad is the begining of an unprecedented series of attack ads that will parade before the American people Obama's cavalcade of bizarre friends and political backers -- also including Jeremiah Wright (whose tell-all book comes out in October), Otis Moss III, James Meeks, Tony Rezko, Father Pfleger, Muslim cousin Raila Odinga, and Michelle herself.

A problem for Obama is that McCain's dubious connections are boring types with little good video.

There was a diary on dKos which said the Obama campaign said that it would ask its supporters (i.e., us) to boycott any stations that ran this ad. If Tena (or anyone else with skills) can ferret out the names of the donors of this ad, and more importantly, their businesses, we can quickly turn this into a publicity nightmare for them.

Consequences.

You just use the internet to find out that the facts of the ad are true. Also find out that just after 9-11 Ayers stated that he was not sorry for the bombings but was sorry they did not do more.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address