Feingold: McCain "Calls 'Em As He Sees 'Em"

What's in the water Dems are drinking today? Don't they want Obama to win the presidential race?
First we had Bob Kerrey praising McCain as someone whose war service shows he "can deal with a crisis." Now the Milwakee Journal Sentinal has this from Senator Russell Feingold:
"I think the guy calls 'em as he sees 'em, and as president would call 'em as he sees 'em, and would make people mad all over the place because it wouldn't fit anybody's playbook," said Feingold, who teamed up with McCain to rewrite federal campaign laws."He would be very original," Feingold said.
Feingold even went on to describe McCain as a "maverick by nature."
This isn't exactly on message with the Obama camp. In fact, the Obama campaign message is that McCain has an image as a maverick who "calls 'em as he sees 'em" but that in reality he isn't that at all. Obviously, someone somewhere has decided that Obama's most prominent surrogates are all supposed to go out and praise McCain en masse today in terms directly at odds with Dem efforts to define him.
Thanks to TPM Reader JR for spotting this one.
Late Update: There's some question as to whether it's fair to identify Feingold and Kerrey as "surrogates." They are probably not surrogates in the sense that the campaign hasn't deputized them to go out and speak to the media on Obama's behalf. They are probably better described as "supporters." Obviously this doesn't make their comments any less objectionable or helpful to McCain, since they're fellow Dems, but it's worth clarifying.















What the fuck, Russ?!?!
August 11, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Et tu Feingold? I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 11, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's not just the "Obama campaign message," that's objective reality.
Feingold needs to face up to that reality. His old buddy GOP Maverick John McCain is gone, and GOP Party Liner John McCain has taken his place.
August 11, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe this will end the: "I really want Russ Feingold as Veep" nonsense.
I don't hear Evan Bayh saying what an "original" "maverick" McCain is.
August 11, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, Bayh just voted for the war and then started the Iraqi Freedom comm. with Lieberman.
August 11, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
So instead, Feingold praises McSame during the presidential race in terms that would make a Republican blush.
Say "G'night," St Russ.
August 11, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Russ has still done way more for Progressive candidates than any other elected official.
August 11, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama leaves on vacation and not even one day goes by prior to the wolves attempting to get ahead. This crap by the democrats has to stop.
August 11, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
it makes me befuddled that both sens. feingold and kerrey said positive things for mccain. it seems odd that they would do so, but i am glad that they are said during a lull in the media coverage of the race.
also, perhaps there is reason behind them praising mccain right now...perhaps they will take a stronger role as bulldog as we get closer to election day, so that they can say "i have said some nice things about sen. mccain before, but i have to say something bad about him right now..."
or perhaps i'm searching for a silver lining that's not there?
August 11, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cogent comment in the article:
Who? Where? We know how, when and why. Once again - who?
August 12, 2008 3:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dems. are not now, and have never been a disciplined group. It amazes me how there doesn't seem to be many surrogates lining up to help Obama fight the GOP, yet we get no shortage of lose cannons (Chuck Schumer, Bob Kerrey, now even Feingold?) looking to independently shoot-off their mouths.
August 11, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
This from the guy who claimned his support of Ashcroft would lead to a new era of cooperation between Dems and BushCo.
As someone who helped vote Russ into the Senate, and even met him back before he ascended his current sainthood, I like him a lot.
Unfortunately, when Russ plants his shoe in a pile of dogshit, he really gives it a twist.
August 11, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed, this is not very helpful. I can understand why Sen Feingold might feel a special regard for Sen McCain (both of them will be chiefly remembered, after all, for their work on McCain-Feingold). Still and all, Sen Feingold can demonstrate his regard for Sen McCain in a fashion more in line with our present talking-points than this. Any Democrat who gives voice to the McCain "maverick" meme needs to have the facts of life re-explained to him.
August 11, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin praised Obama's energy roll out and Pawlenty praised his positive messages.
Regarding Feingold, I guess this is the blow back for Obama thumbing his nose at Feingold's Campaign Finance Reform Bill.
There is also rumblings that McCain might pledge to serve only one term, with the message being that since he won't worry about getting re-elected he could really clean up Washington. This would be interesting because it would lessen the age issue people have with him, and the GOP base might rally around him more if they know they'd only have four years with him and it would given them time to right their ship.
August 11, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ya know what dude, you really can be a downer sometime. I call myself an "optimistic pessimist", but you may have me beat.LOL.
Anyway, if Dems like Feingold think that allowing McCain to serve one term it will help "change Washington" then we deserve a president like McCain.
As we say in my 'hood, no matter becomes President "I'm gon get mine". But some people will feel the hurt much more than I.
Americans deserve the President they get when the majority choose to be stupid
August 11, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
That might also re-energize the Hillaristas.
August 11, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I though about that angle, however I assumed they'd be voting for McCain anyways so Hillary could challenge him in four years time.
August 11, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would discredit such self-serving possibilities. I find it just incredibly unlikely that McCain would make such a pledge and honor it.
It's like a pledge to serve only 1 or 2 terms in the Congress. Lots of politicians make them and very, very few abide by them, finding some reason not to abide by their pledge when it comes time to face re-election. Apparently they all end up being too invaluable to discontinue their service. (Didn't Lieberman do that?)
Talk is cheap.
August 11, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's even too cynical for me.
However, not voting as a conscientious objector is perfectly legit. I'm not going to be complicit in either one of these guys being elected.
August 11, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Typical effing dems at their usual best of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. What a bunch of losers !
August 11, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
zactly! The phrase "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity" immediately sprang to mind.
August 11, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
nice!
August 11, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus,
McCain can take every weekend off since he clinched the nomiation, and you hear nary a peep out of the Repub, but Obama can't go 3 whole days on vaction in 18months before Dems start putting their feet in their mouths.
This is just ridiculous. This just reaffirms that if Obama does win, it wasn't because of the efforts of those old school "elected" dems.
I'm sorry, but this really pisses me off. I'm all for speaking freely, but STFU. I think that this is another case where the speaker is not apart of the Obama teams insiders, so they go running off at the mouth out of spite.
Idiots.
August 11, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a disillusionment. :(
Feingold was one of the few senators I still had some respect for.
There seems to be an effort going on to sabotage Obama's candidacy - by Democrats, no less!
Feingold, Bob Kerrey, Wolfson (well, maybe he doesn't count as a Dem), and all this talk of Clinton supporters planning protests at the convention.
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/plans-for-clinton-convention-rallies-intensify-2008-08-10.html
My hunch is that this will all backfire and will garner even more enthusiastic support for Obama.
The constituents of these Democratic saboteurs won't soon forget.
August 11, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even worse, Saint Russ threw this tidbit to the right wing Journal Sentinel, meaning it's gonna get play from now until November.
Wouldn't be surprised to see McGoo pop it in an ad... the perfect rebuttal to recent challenges to his "Maverick" image.
Fuck you, Feingold. Fuck you twice.
August 11, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
My thoughts exactly, especially since it's Russ. He's the last person anyone would expect to spew this horseshit.
August 11, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beyond belief from someone, Feingold, who's been a voice of reason.
Then again, as much as I've liked Feingold's positions over the years, it's debatable just how good a politician he is. It's one thing to take a good position, but it is another entirely to be able to rally people to your position.
If he can't see the dire situation at hand and how he needs to back his party's candidate 100%, he clearly has a major blind spot and real deficits as a politician.
I agree with others who have stated that this is typical Dem political incompetence.
August 11, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had the honor of seeing Sen. Russ Feingold this last weekend. Feingold did lump some praise on McCain then as well, however, he also drove it home that we had to vote for Obama as President and was very strong on why we had to do so.
--"I'd rather have Obama for many, many reasons," Feingold said, citing his deep differences with McCain over foreign policy, health care and civil liberties, and his belief that Obama could be an inspirational president.
Notice how the article doesn't focus on what is in bold? Now, obviously this is still sloppy and ripe to be taken out of context. However, some blame needs to be placed on the reporter who didn't see it fit to put all of Feingold's interview into print. namely, the part that, I'm sure, was very similar to his statements this weekend- a strong rationale as to why Obama has to win.
I think it's also important to understand that the two worked together for 6+ years on campaign finance reform. They are friends and obviously have earned each other's respect.
Finally, in his personal appearance this weekend he really drove home how we need more and better Democrats at all levels of gov't. The desire to turn out the vote for local, state, and federal Democrats was palpable. His interest in grassroots efforts was obvious. Not too many Senators will travel to a small town in Republican district to hold a listening session and then help open a freshly minted Democratic office. He did, and on a Saturday, no less. On Sunday he was in the next county over doing a listening session. The guy works hard and he works hard for Democrats and progressives at all levels of government.
So please, consider those things before you rake him over the coals.
August 11, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
In short, you are saying "parse and forget". Sheesh.
August 11, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm saying Russ does a lot of good work and we shouldn't be so eager to throw him under the bus.
August 11, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well he did seem pretty eager to kill the Obama campaign with one interview here.
August 11, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, let's just throw Feingold to the wolves, for one misstatement.
August 11, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feingold should know by now that the media's just going to find a good soundbite and run with it, context be damned.
August 11, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and Bush's statement about Iraq buying yellowcake was just "sixteen words".
Feingold is singing the praises of the man who threw the Constitution "under the bus". Does Russ think torture and domestic spying are admirable, examples of original independence?
he's an idiot
August 11, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well at least we have a talking point to counter the "St. Feingold" contingent around here.
August 11, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, because that's a real problem in the party(eyes roll).
August 11, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well at least we have a talking point to counter the "St. Feingold" contingent around here.
Yeah. Because there's only one Democratic politician who Must Always Remain Above Criticism around here.
There is only one Democratic politician any criticism of whom is policed, monitored, and spammed around here.
And it ain't Russ Feingold.
August 11, 2008 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
It wasn't one misstatement, he was waxing poetic about the Maverick McCain. And at a time when Obama's main critique of McCain is that he'd be Bushes 3rd term. Russ is a smart man, which means to me he did this with purpose.
August 11, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right. It's so much easier for the media to focus on "sound bites." They want to stir up controversy, not do in-depth reporting.
sad, sad, sad.
August 11, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg Milbank? Whoda thunk?
August 11, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope... no forgiving Russ for this blunder.
He knows better and deserves the trip to the woodshed his constituents will be giving him for this.
August 11, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you.
there's no excuse or parsing this crap.
Feingold fucked up, and handed the McWar forces a talking point to support their entire bullshit "maverick" theme.
Dumbass.
August 11, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't really believe in the whole Obamabot type-cast, you, however, are the exception. Pot meet kettle.
August 11, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
is this too absolutist?
democrats want to win and be right, so they're willing to criticize their presumptive nominee if he isn't perfect on a number of issues
republicans want to simply win, so they're willing to keep their mouths shut on the obvious failings of their presumptive nominee
August 11, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
This just shows certain resentment in the party for Obama, and could forebode him having trouble keeping discipline in the ranks.
However not all is lost, because McCain is also trying to appeal to the GOP base, and if McCain wants to use Feingold's words against Obama, he's also using those words against the GOP base he is trying to appeal to. McCain can't both be a Maverick and appeal to the Bush Dead-Enders.
The Obama camp message has always been McCain was a maverick, but he isn't anymore.
Doesn't Feingold realize McCain is skirting his own bill? That their bill was bad because it did little to rein in the 527's or the Party monies?
August 11, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
[blockquote]Obviously, someone somewhere has decided that Obama's most prominent surrogates are all supposed to go out and praise McCain[/blockquote]
Again, Bob Kerrey isn't an Obama surrogate. Not in any way, shape, or form could he be considered an a surrogate.
August 11, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
First Kerrey, now Feingold.
Maybe there's some weird alternative strategy going on here? Although even giving everybody the benefit of the doubt, I can't imagine what it would be.
I guess I'll stop trying to assign a reasonable explanation to these comments and go with the consensus - Kerrey and Feingold are being stupid.
August 11, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Giving McCain credit for whatever he did is fine but for Finegold to give him this kind of shower of gold powder is certainly not fine unless Finegold does not realized we in the middle of THE election of the century. very very disappointed.
August 11, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
A golden shower?
August 11, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, it is all devolving into a political pissing contest.
August 11, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Awww, piss off!!!
August 11, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
urine trouble for making that remark.
August 11, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wanna visit Uranus?
August 11, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this is much ado about nothing. Feingold has worked with McCain before and I suspect he wants to work with him again after he loses to Barack in the fall. No need to engage in personal attacks or lie to stay on whatever talking point that believes is appropriate.
It's not disasterous. It's just not.
August 11, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
The real mccain:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B4914192B-12AF-4623-AB18-5EFE91204B04%7D&print=true&dist=printMidSection
August 11, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
kerrey is an original neocon, so i'm not surprised, but feingold? WTF?
August 11, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's most prominent surrogates
don't you think that's going a little far? i've never seen either of them on any of the networks acting as a surrogate for obama. i would say, however, that the obama campaign has a serious problems with weak surrogates, but that's a whole 'nother conversation.
August 11, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I don't belong to an organized political party. I'm a Dimmicrat.
โThe Democratic Party ainโt on speaking terms with itself.โ
"Mr. Dooley" (Finley Peter Dunne)
August 11, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
As people have pointed out, this just goes to show why we really do need people who are good at being politicians, despite how much everyone despises them. It doesn't matter if you spend half an hour praising your party's candidate, when you make comments that support your opponent it undermines everything you've said and that's what gets picked up.
August 11, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is, if you'll forgive my bluntness, nothing more than Feingold jerking off to his own image as a "maverick". Praising McCain is praising a man who gives his full-throated support to torture, spying on American citizens, the abolition of habeas corpus, and every other Constitutional crime of the Bush administration that McCain has relentlessly supported.
Feingold should be ashamed of himself. This is self-congratulation taken to the extreme of immorality.
The "Progressive Patriots' Fund" called asking me to renew my support last week. I told them it was a bad time. This is the first time in my life I've ever hoped for a telemarketer to be more persistent.
August 11, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is what happens when you get a campaign dominated by lots and lots of Senators.
August 11, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is typical Feingold. he is great as an idea leader but doesn't understand leading people or movements
August 11, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Disagree totally. Progressive Patriot Fund? Endorsing local and state-level candidates in WI? Supporting other candidates around the country? Sending volunteers around the country? Russ has given much to not only get more Democrats, but better Democrats.
But let's forget all that. Under the bus he goes.
August 11, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think anyone's really throwing Russ under the bus. We all know he's a good guy.
Unfortunately, sometimes even the good guys need to be throttled.
August 11, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
If a Democrat Senate colleague is complimentary of McCain, that Dem is more credible with independents when he endorses Barack.
Just at thought.
August 11, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feingold's a post-partisan Progressive in a very partisan world.
I think it's important to look at this statement through that lens.
He looked at both candidates, saw admireable qualities in both (after working with them), but endorses Obama because he lines up best with his Progressive agenda.
It's a good endorsement for anyone who's wavering between the two candidates, or at least it was this weekend when (I saw him in person) Feingold said similar things but also made a strong case for voting FOR OBAMA.
If you want to blame someone, blame the shitty reporter of this article for not putting any of Feingold's endorsements FOR OBAMA into print.
August 11, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm willing to agree with josephcast a little here, in that, if the reporter did edit out the pro-Obama content Feingold's been including in his other public remarks, I don't think we'd be having such a strong reaction.
However, given how important it is for the Dems to be a unified party fully backing an historic candidate, I really don't think he should be answering questions about McCain with anything more than something like, "Listen, I've worked closely with Sen. McCain for many years and I respect him, but I'm currently committed to the election of my party's candidate, a man whom I think will be an inspiring president."
August 11, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, should read:
I'm willing to agree with josephcast a little here, in that, if the reporter hadn't edited out the pro-Obama content Feingold's been including in his other public remarks, I don't think we'd be having such a strong reaction.
August 11, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain voted for the Military Commissions Act, which gave the veneer of legality to torture and abolition of habeas corpus, after vowing to sacrifice his presidential ambitions to blocking it.
If Russ Feingold admires John McCain, I do not admire Russ Feingold.
August 11, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
one issue supporter, congratulations!
August 11, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Constitution is "one issue"?
August 11, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, considering Feingold is one of the most ardent supporters of the Constitution in our party (right behind Byrd), I think you should rethink your estimation of him.
August 11, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"They both have the intellectual ability and the maturity to form judgments about important policy issues. I'd feel comfortable with both of them in there as president," Feingold said.
[...]"It's unfair, because McCain's a blast. He's fun to be around. He's certainly young in spirit. He's actually very young in energy," said Feingold.
So he's an "ardent supporter" of the Constitution, but he would be "comfortable" with a President who supports torture, indefinite detention, domestic spying, and a complete abolition of checks and balances? Seems to me a President McCain would make an "ardent supporter" of the Constitution pretty uncomfortable.
But then I'm basing my opinion on McCain's voting record and stated positions, not the fact that he's simply a delightful fellow to have lunch with.
August 11, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good lord, read the Journal article, read my post above, notice what's in bold.....
citing his deep differences with McCain over foreign policy, health care and civil liberties, and his belief that Obama could be an inspirational president.
Not everything is black and white, dude.
August 11, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read the entire article, and it's pretty clear that Feingold gives his social relationship to McCain and their history on "one issue" more weight in his judgement of McCain than to those "deep differences".
This is all about Feingold's ego, stroking himself for being all mavericky and independent his own self. It's politically stupid and, in light of McCain's actual stated positions and votes, immoral.
August 11, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, look who's on their soapbox, you or Feingold?
August 11, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess you're out of arguments when presented with facts.
Finding torture and indefinite detention without cause immoral is 'soapboxy'? Sorry if my ardent support of the Constitution makes you uncomfortable.
August 11, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
And you misunderstand what I'm saying. The one that's looking like an egomaniac is you, not Russ Feingold. You'd gladly throw under the bus a guy who has ardently defended the Constitution over and over. The guy who was the one vote, 98-1, against the Patriot Act, because he's friends with McCain. Well I have lots of friends that are Republican, I'm not gonna say shit about them b/c they are. I don't get you, I really don't. Your one issue with Feingold is he gave some underhanded praise to McCain- that's it! That's your one issue with Feingold. Great reason to throw the most Progressive leader we have under the bus. Congrats.
PS. Feingold's Progressive Patriot PAC is sending a member to CO to canvas for the Democrats running in your state. That means far more to me and our "cause" than any statement he's made about how McCain is "original", while also saying he supports Obama 100%.
August 11, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
My response below.
August 11, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
You give interview to the right wing media and expect them report truthfully without editing ???
Feingold must be stupider than I thought.
August 11, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Done.
August 11, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, not blaming the media for this one. Dog bites man isn't news. Democrat bites Democrat is. Russ knows that full damn well.
August 11, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, this is the one time I've been very disappointed in Russ Feingold. Usually everything that comes out of his mouth is pretty much gold, but wow, he is way off the mark here.
Apparently Russ isn't aware of McCain's 95% vote-with-Bush rating.
I am saddened. Russ just lost a few points with me.
August 11, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, Feingold's comments will be used to reinforce the slime bucket commercial running ad nauseum in the Olympic venue... Is Obama ready to lead?
Silly damned nonsense, but Feingold should know better than to unsheath his kind remarks in a pit bull's enclosure.
August 11, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
To all above: Oh, calm down, Mary.
What Feingold said about McCain first off was not the verbal equivalent of tonguing his arsehole. He essentially said that McCain has no filter between brain and mouth and would piss a lot of people off. And the "original" could just as easily be a backhanded compliment. Looks like to me he made some comments that weren't overly praiseful. And as josephcast points out, they were no doubt coupled with a longer statement about why Obama would be the better president. He managed to say something that wouldn't alienate McCain, who he has worked with closely in the Senate, without singing his praises.
Second, there has been some speculation for some time now about whether or not it's appropriate to continue to call Bob Kerrey a Democrat. He has shown several times over the past few years that in his mind, bipartisianship = capitulation. And he doesn't currently hold office. Tell me again why anyone gives a fart in a high wind about what his opinion is on anything?
Third, back to Russ: pretty much every comment above excoriating him for these tepid comments includes this idea: "why can't Democrats stick together?" I'll leave it up to the reader to pinpoint the irony there. Because when it comes to the things that most people who read and comment on this blog care most about, there has not been one single, solitary Democrat serving in national office who has supported us more than Russ Feingold has. And suddenly none of that matters because he made some comments about McCain that fell short of being openly insulting?
Get a grip, folks.
August 11, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did we have to go there, Jenn?
And at lunchtime?
August 11, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just be thankful I toned it down. ;)
August 11, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. You continue to be one of the most reasonable and rational voices that visit here.
August 11, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, please. No one is suggesting hanging, drawing and quartering or even an elaborate show trial followed by a a rousing round of self-criticism and a few years in a reeducation camp for Russ.
As far as I can tell, everyone's just suggesting this might be a good time for certain Democratic elected officials to pour themselves a good big glass of milk and stir a heaping damn tablespoon of chocolatey STFU. I'd say that's not a disproportionate response.
August 11, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear!
August 11, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Bob Kerry and Russ Feingold dust-ups don't bother me much.
First, just being a Democrat does not make you an Obama surrogate. In both parties, only some officeholders have agreed to let their strings be pulled by the presidential campaigns.
Also, these guys have their own jobs to do, their own constituencies to represent, and their own working relationships (especially in the Senate) to maintain.
Not everybody can be on-guard 100% of the time against fleeting moments of candor -- little sound bites which, when taken out of context, can provide the opposing presidential campaign with a little bit of ammo.
As been pointed out, to paraphrase Will Rogers, I don't belong to any organized political party. I'm a Democrat. And give thanks for that, too. If the Democrats were as lock-step as the Repuglicans, you wouldn't want to be a Democrat.
August 11, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have to take issue with this statement. Use of the term "lockstep" is hyperbolic. No one wants the Democratic Party to become lockstep, but they DO desperately need to be more unified than they have been for a long, long pitiful time.
Losing twice to Bush II and performing horribly as an opposition party in congress in terms of oversight and accountability have had truly tragic consequences, and if you can't see how a lack of unity in the Dem Party has been a huge factor in their ineffectiveness, well, I don't know what to say about that.
August 11, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think so. At least, I don't think it's hyperbolic by much. Maybe I'm conflating two contexts here.
I was thinking about all those House votes where bills were passed by a margin of one or two. Votes that were held open 'til DeLay and Co could twist that last arm hard enough to break it. That strikes me as very much lock-step.
As for surrogates and supporters sometimes not being on-message, yeah, the Rs have had an occasional slip. But not many. I think the party discipline that results in voting uniformity has great overlap with on-message discipline.
It comes from being beholden to such a huge degree to all the money that finances campaigns.
August 11, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for nothing, Russ.
August 11, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes, McCain calls them as he sees them i.e. cu*t and trollop.
August 11, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feingold indicates he now realizes Mr. Oilbama is a self-absorbed celebrity who ducks meetings with wounded American troops and wants to raise taxes, and is someone who voted for Dick Chent's Big Oil Energy Bill. People are catching on to Oilbama as he gets vetted by the Republicans. Hillary had to take it easy on him because of Oilbamabots screaming that everyone who did not agree with them were racists. Since that got old no one will believe them anymore.
August 11, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is why we loose elections. Zero discipline.
August 11, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Y'all just can't stand a little honesty from Democrats.
Obama gets begrudging praise for his handlers ability to game the system.
McCain receives it for an actual record of service.
Clinton...Clinton...Clinton....Denver.
August 11, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the JS article, emphasis added:
See, even he really does know that he shouldn't be saying this stuff, or at least now so frickin' much of it.
Yes, lack of discipline, and the stakes are WAY too high to not be disciplined right now.
August 11, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
edit: should be "not so frickin' much.
August 11, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain does call em as he sees em.
...He doesn't see em!
August 11, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
And he sees 'em according to the last cellphone call he gets.
August 11, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd argue, given the frequency that this is happening these last few days and the issues which have been highlighted in each instance, that this is part of a larger Vanity Trap of sorts, designed to have Senator McCain take more solid Ownership of certain traits in their rush to take the obvious highground in the daily spin cycle (as they no doubt will with today's noted quips from both Feingold and B Kerry). With Senator Obama Out of Frame, Senator McCain's campaign is certain to jump quickly at a perceived strategic or messaging blunder.
They take the day, feeling vindicated in message management - only to further trumpet and cement themselves into a corner on framing in the larger picture. Coincidentally, of course, amplifying the very frame the Obama campaign would like to contrast against through the convention.
Give Senator McCain a week or two to swell with pride, and pop the resulting ego like a balloon in plain view at the convention.
In the business world, you'd think of Feingold and Kerry as Loss Leaders, in this case designed to prop up perceptual "advantages" of a competing brand to nudge them into a messaging alignment that's more beneficial to your next move.
Feingold's statement, in fact, has Just Enough veiled insult built in to simply appear to be genuine low-hanging sweets: exactly what you'd want in a good HoneyPot. So many here have stuck their hand inside, even given the insulting tone of the comment, that I can't help but think the GOP would assuredly do the same ;)
August 11, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
You do realize that these people you suggest are acting on a carefully laid plan are Democrats, right?
August 11, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. In point of fact - that very stereotype is required ;)
August 11, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Add McCain campaign credulity and stir? Next topic, gentlemen (once a given): Is McCain a maverick?
Tim Pawlenty wanted to highlight Obama's positive tone just as it became increasingly inevitable Obama would go on the attack. Obama wasn't too interested.
August 11, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean, pretend this is a case of Invaders from the Deep, just to spring the Revenge of the Mysterians come convention time?
August 11, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see why the dem's keep losing elections---they talk too much. But then again, Governors Paulin, Plawlenty and Sanford all have praised Obama in the past. I guess it cuts both ways, that said, dem's need to refrain from praising McShame--its not helpful to themselves, Obama or the party.
August 11, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feingold provides fulsome of Obama in the article. However, the author of the article continues to push feingold-McCain working relationship. Don't blame feingold.
August 11, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feingold provides fulsome praise of Obama in the article. However, the author of the article continues to push feingold-McCain working relationship. Don't blame feingold.
August 11, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
josephcast:
I don't have the power to throw anyone under any bus. I just want Russ Feingold to not be stupid. His vote against the Patriot Act was great. Progressive Patriots is a great idea. And neither will mean shit-all if John McCain gets into the White House.
Why is Russ Feingold "comfortable" with a man who is, literally, the incarnation of the Patriot Act in the Oval Office?
If Russ Feingold wants to have dinner with Senator McCain next February and gab about how much fun they had with McCain-Feingold, that's none of my business. As a Democrat and an American, it is my business if Senator Feingold is fluffing McCain on the record during the campaign.
As for "underhanded praise", this seems to be the defense? That Feingold was damning McCain with faint praise? Please.
Feingold calls McCain "very original" and a "maverick by nature." McCain's own TV ads call him the "original maverick."
[...]
But he doesn't take issue with McCain's presentation of himself as a politician with a deep independent streak.
"He is not a guy who wants to be chummy-chummy with political leaders of the party. He doesn't like that sort of constraint. He's an independent," said Feingold. "So he somehow managed to become the nominee of the Republican Party. But we all know it's not because he was somebody that was kissing up to the Republican establishment, to say the least."
Besides being straight out of McCain's own campaign ads, this is complete and utter bullshit. McCain has, as he gleefully admits, spent eight years kissing up to the Republican Establishment: MCA? the Webb vets' bill? FISA? Jerry Falwell? Tax cuts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U5KZzgaB2k
Feingold has his head square up his ass, and judging from this interview, is more concerned with his social relationship with McCain than with policy and consequences of this election.
August 11, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The comments were stupid. However, I don't think it's a breaker for me. Apparently, it is for you. I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
He is very concerned about the outcome of this election and if the Journal had put out his full quotes on why he supports Obama- you would see that.
I saw it this last weekend, where he also said that McCain wasn't a hard right-winger. He also loaded on the reasons why we must support Obama- civil liberties, healthcare, et al.
I blame the reporter, and I do put some blame on Feingold, but I still believe what Feingold has done for the Progressive movement far out weighs this statement.
For everyone that finds these statements dispicable, do you find Gov. Schweitzer to be so for his statements in support of Romney? Just curious.
August 11, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/8/0556/05698/258/255003
August 11, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I do find Schweitzer's comments despicable. The Democratic Party is filled with all sorts of oddballs, or they breed them before they leave the party (e.g. Lieberman).
Again, as I said above, the party need not be lockstep, but it is pathetic how little unification there is, how many different flavors of Dems there are, and the result is an ineffective if not incompetent political entity that does not offer a very good option to voters turned off by the GOP.
August 11, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, it doesn't matter if it's a breaker for me since I don't live in WI and would still vote for him if I did. I'm pissed off, I'm not interested in burning down the party to save it.
Vulgar politics aside, how do you reconcile his vote against the Patriot Act and his normal assertive progressivism with his "comfort" with President McCain? Not snark, I'm serious. And his description of John McCain as if the last eight years, and especially the last five, never happened? That's just weird, and to me is the same sort of blinkered, lazy Beltway thinking that got Joe Lieberman back in the Senate (Joe? A demented vindictive crackpot? But I've known him for years....). I expect more from Feingold; if this came from my own Ken Salazar, I'd just roll my eyes and say "same old same old".
And McCain is a hard right-winger. If anything, the war, his need to vindicate his belief in militarism, has solidified his authoritarianism.
Feingold needs to trust his lyin' eyes, not his warm, fuzzy memories of an eight year old campaign.
As for Schweitzer: I've never been as big a fan as some, I seem to remember a few weeks ago he made some decidedly Archie Bunkerbufferish comments about "Teh Left", and he's not as likely to draw national media attention as Feingold.
August 11, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I understand that McCain and Feingold are good friends. I find McCain's record disgusting and I am dismayed Feingold didn't call McCain out on it. However, I believe as I stated up thread that Feingold gives a good endorsement of Obama, esentially this is an argument (when fully published) that would be effective in swaying Repubs, Independents, etc, in it's full context. Again, I heard his pitch in person this weekend in a very Republican district and it works in that context. It works in Wisconsin. It also would work if this would be the campaign McCain said he wanted to run- namely, a clean one (which Feingold also calls him out on).
My major problem is this newspaper didn't run any of Feingold's substantial arguements for Obama.
August 11, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find it interesting that the two of the men I respect the most in the party, Schweitzer and Feingold have made these statements. I do not condone them by any means, yet I still have great admiration for what they have DONE. I'm not going to let what they've said, inartfully, go against all the good they have done. So I still support them both. I do wish they wouldn't make statements like these without being damn sure it's in the right context.
I suppose what makes them say these things is also the reason I like them so much. Namely, they march to their own drummer.
August 11, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Calling them "supporters" is not even accurate.
Kerrey has been smearing / slandering Obama for over a year. Why tag him with the "supporter" label?
He's an anti-Obama troll.
Why, oh why, must you force people who have nothing to do with Obama into the "surrogate" or "supporter" role???
August 11, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe Feingold figures the blue dog wing is no more likely to defend our liberties and our children's future than are the Republicans. I hope it's payback for Obama's stand on FISA. Probably isn't but if it is I say way to go, Russ!
August 11, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink