Election Central Saturday Roundup
New Obama Ad: Regardless Of VP Pick, McCain Just More Of The Same
The Obama campaign has a new ad on national cable, responding to Sarah Palin's selection as John McCain's running mate. The ad says regardless of McCain's pick for vice president, he still just promises more of George Bush's agenda:
Obamas And Bidens In Ohio Today
The Obama-Biden ticket is continuing their Rust Belt bus tour, stopping today in Ohio. Earlier this morning they attended a public memorial for the late Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones, and tonight they have a rally in Dublin scheduled to begin at 6:45 p.m.
GOP Ticket In Pennsylvania Today
John McCain and Sarah Palin are campaigning today in the town of Washington, Pennsylvania, a small suburb of Pittsburgh.
Palin: Global Warming Isn't Man-Made
In an interview with the right-wing site NewsMax, Sarah Palin gave a scientific pronouncement that goes against John McCain's own stated position as well as most credible scientists. On global warming: "I'm not one though who would attribute it to being man-made."
Palin Pick Gives McCain Financial Boost
Jonathan Martin reports that Sarah Palin's selection was able to give John McCain a boost in excitement and fundraising. A campaign aide says they took in about $4.5 million yesterday, a very impressive number.
McCain Adviser: McCain Will Live Long Enough To Teach Palin Foreign Policy
Here's what long-time McCain political aide Charlie Black told the New York Times about concerns over Sarah Palin's inexperience: "She's going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years, and most doctors think that he'll be around at least that long."

"She's going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years, and most doctors think that he'll be around at least that long."
Right. And didn't Mr. & Mrs. Lincoln have dinner reservations after the play?
August 30, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
"But McMaster, I'm confused. Does Pakistan and Iraq share a common border or not?"
"Sarahopper, you sure look pretty today."
August 30, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
This site is screwing up to today badly. Anyhow, this is a stunningly irresponsible quote by Charlie Black. He must be hopped on prescription drugs. Reckless beyond belief. Stupefying.
May he have health and long life.
Master? MY ASS!!
August 30, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
So funny...
McCain's an arrogant, egotistical, sexist asshole. But that's OK. Obama's staying cool and calm and that means more trouble ahead for "The Master."
August 30, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um, this is one grossly irreponsible quote. When I read it on your comment I thought it must be an error or a joke. No, Charlie Black apparently said that??!!
It's actually breathtaking.
1. I wish McCain health and long life, way past 100 years. Her too.
2. He ain't no master of foreign policy as his intemperate crack up Georgia showed, on top of not knowing Sunni from Shia, who's funding whom, and where Iraq's borders are. *Please.*
3. I still can't believe this shatteringly reckless thing was actually said. Stupefying to me.
Thanks.
August 30, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
"...and most doctors think that he'll be around at least that long."
Well, I'd like to here from the doctors who don't think he'll be around at least that long!
Just where are those medical records that couldn't be released or copied?
PEACE
August 30, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
this is a pathetic choice of a VP pick. Maybe Biden will teach her some things in the debate
Interview with McCain and Palin, "yup"
August 30, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Will her response be like this?
August 30, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is a pathetic choice of a VP pick. Maybe Biden will teach her some things in the debate
Interview with McCain and Palin, "yup"
August 30, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
sorry for numerous post, didn't mean it
August 30, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
this is a pathetic choice of a VP pick. Maybe Biden will teach her some things in the debate
Interview with McCain and Palin, "yup"
August 30, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
this is a pathetic choice of a VP pick. Maybe Biden will teach her some things in the debate
Interview with McCain and Palin, "yup"
August 30, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
this is a pathetic choice of a VP pick. Maybe Biden will teach her some things in the debate
Interview with McCain and Palin, "yup"
August 30, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
The pick of Palin may have just lost McCain Florida:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/30/115850/627/527/580198
August 30, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The narrative should not change. McCain is more of the same. There isn't any reason to change the discussion that was begun at the DNC last week.
August 30, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
The pick of Palin should be seen at as a retreat by the McCain campaign. They were trying to hold the "experience" line and just had to abandon it. Now we are going to be hearing about what kind of change agents (ahem, "reformers") McCain and Palin are.
The "Change vs. Experience" battle has been won. Obama is setting the narrative and agenda of this election and needs keep marching forward.
August 30, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Expect to hear "reformers" about 1 billion times between now and November.
August 30, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I still don't get it. On what basis can they argue that they are "agents of change?" What aspects of McCain's policy agenda represents change?
August 30, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, hopefully somebody will ask him that question.
August 30, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I suppose he'll tell them to read his books.
"Don't you know I'm Mavericky? I'm Mavericky McCain!"
August 30, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mavericky McCain and his sidekick Barracuda Gal don't have to explain themselves to noone.
I still hope Obama people find a way to use that not a maverick, that's a sidekick line.
August 30, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you're missing the fact that McCain is running on bringing down the price of gas and very little else.
So I think team Obama needs to narrow in there as well. Schweitzer's speech points in the right direction. Because Palin is going to be enormously helpful in this regard and being smugly fatheaded about her is exactly what we can't be.
Take a look at her interview with Charlie Rose from last fall if you want to see how neatly she was able to dovetail national security and the interests of big oil and drilling.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charlie-rose/my-conversation-with-sara_b_122415.html
August 30, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love that the McCain campaign has to assure us he, "Will live long enough to teach Palin what she needs to know."
How do they know that?
August 30, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
they don't "know" it. but "most" doctors "think" it. apparently.
August 30, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that the Palin pick has put questions about McCain's age and health front center is reason enough to see this as a dumb pick by McCain.
August 30, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I also find it interesting that the issue of his health has been raised. The Time article this week about his "prickliness" and others that are pointing out that he isn't "who he used to be," I think are starting to get at the possibility of his mental health being an issue (i.e., senility).
If Ms. Palin was sharp as a tack, she could be someone who might balance that (I'm being generous here). But, from what I've seen so far, she appears to be as confused as he is. She's been described so far as "quite nice."
Leadership from these two?
Ummmm...No way.
August 30, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
You said it.
Any day age and health is hinted at is a bad day for McCain.
And the visuals of her and him together just magnify this issue.
August 30, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the McCain camp drank the msm PUMA Kool Aid. The msm loves controversy and tried to make a big issue of the
whole PUMA phenomenon which quickly fizzled out. Palin is the antithesis of Hillary.
August 30, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know what, I think that maybe you are correct. I have been pissed about the right-wing media playing up the puma bs and claiming that there are huge numbers. The number is probably in the hundreds or maybe thousands max and these are the same people that wouldn't have voted for obama anyway. Maybe they did us a favor by feeding the puma bs to the republicans and they bought it. Too funny.
August 30, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
"right wing media"
That's redundant.
August 30, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Based on the feminist boards, they are really leaning towards McCain now.
They are buying into the "Change Washington" and think all of the criticism of Palin is sexist.
Obama Campaign had better be very careful here.
August 30, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Feminist boards? I have to ask which you're reading.
All in all, you see condemnation everywhere of McCain and his pick--Feministing, Jezebel, Echidne, and about a dozen others. I'm not worried about ideological feminists. It's more low-information female voters who're the ones being made a play for.
I think it'll fall flat, but I can't say that with the certainty I can about the avowedly feminist vote.
August 30, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I, for as liberal as I am, am anti-abortion, and yet I was appalled that she is AGAINST abortion even in the case of rape or incest. That would do it for any woman, except those that were total McCain religious nuts. Just wait until her views get out there, then let's see how the fems vote.
BTW, I think the whole PUMA thing is GOP made, and the women that were mad over Hillary would never vote for McCain. After hearing a few of them speak the other day, it is obvious they are props.
August 30, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry double post, this blogging today is trying here.
August 30, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I, for as liberal as I am, am anti-abortion on a personal note (not a political one), and yet I was appalled that she is AGAINST abortion even in the case of rape or incest. That would do it for any woman, except those that were total McCain religious nuts. Just wait until her views get out there, then let's see how the fems vote.
BTW, I think the whole PUMA thing is GOP made, and the women that were mad over Hillary would never vote for McCain. After hearing a few of them speak the other day, it is obvious they are props.
August 30, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly what boards are you thinking represent Feminists and are leaning towards McCain? Please don't suggest Hillary44.
I think it would behoove all of us to rethink exactly what a PUMA was (I'm using past tense here, because I think that they are now, virtually, on the brink of extinction).
I do not believe that these hold outs were ultra-feminists. I believe that they were more of the Limbaugh Operation Chaos ilk. The sentiments of one who now might be inclined to support McCain/Palin, and claimed during the primaries to oppose Obama due to their firm commitment to Women's issues, should not be attributed to feminism. Palin does NOT demonstrate any support for Women's issues. The idea that she will attract support from women because she is a woman demonstrates an extreme lack of understanding of what feminism is on the part of McCain and his people.
And frankly, they don't really care - they weren't trying to reach out to actual feminists, that would be an impossibility from the Republican ranks. This is simply about trying to switch up the dynamics of the game.
If you actually believe that Feminists are leaning toward supporting Palin, I'd love to see the evidence of that. Links would be appreciated.
August 30, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
my guess is that that's all just phony noise being made by mccain supporters.
i also think that the majority of the PUMA noise was being made by mccain supporters in the first place. anyone who was (supposedly) going to vote for hillary but will vote for mccain is categorically not a feminist. even if they call themselves feminists - whether they believe themselves to be feminists or are just pretending to be feminists.
this is not something obama supporters should worry about. the obama ticket wins hands down on women's issues.
August 30, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Feminist Boards? Which boards are those? No Quarter USA perhaps? The idea that Feminists go to only one or two boards is ludicrous and insulting to women everywhere!
Feminist Boards My Tush!
August 30, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know what, I think that maybe you are correct. I have been pissed about the right-wing media playing up the puma bs and claiming that there are huge numbers. The number is probably in the hundreds or maybe thousands max and these are the same people that wouldn't have voted for obama anyway. Maybe they did us a favor by feeding the puma bs to the republicans and they bought it. Too funny.
August 30, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
exactly right. thanks, tiny band of PUMAs and media enablers!
August 30, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is a continuation of the continuation. She's even more Bush than McCain is, almost a clone. See my post on this.
August 30, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
She is beyond Bush or McCain, and I think McCain is beyond Bush. She is like Dobson or Robertson. She is damn out to lunch, with her little world being Alaska. Without exposure in life, one thinks little ideas and small reasoning and hers are appalling.
August 30, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beyond the Pale, so to speak...
August 30, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
indeed, no need to go after her; focus on McCain, including his temper, his wanting to bomb Iran, his being more Bush than Bush ... Palin will self-destruct. I feel sort of bad for the lady, who seems nice enough. But when you realize that she accepted the offer from McCain, that she really thinks she can do this, that she has no idea of what she's getting in to, that she is utterly clueless, well, then the feeling sorry sort of dissipates ...
August 30, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
How can you feel bad for anyone that ruthlessly destroys the careers of two public servants, could give a shit about the Polar Bear becoming extinct, and regardless of science discounts global warming? Her favorite meat is moose?! She warrants no sympathy. She is off the deep end.
August 30, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's definitely not "nice". Google her and Todd and do a little reading. She is small-time, of course, but she's ruthless. She and Todd ran Wasilla and then Alaska like the evil Prom King and Queen out to destroy the kind-hearted, plain-looking couple everyone was rooting for. And read up on her "legacy," the ice sports complex for which she exercised eminent domain and ran up huge legal bills.
This is a dangerous woman. Don't give her credit fior being nice. Watch your back.
August 30, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice analogy, OA. I agree, this woman needs to be sent back to the hinterland.
August 30, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
"She's going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years, and most doctors think that he'll be around at least that long."
Isn't the fact that he felt the need to add this line enough cause for concern? Most Doctors think he'll live at least another 4 years? Jesus Christ. If that were me, I wouldn't like those odds very much.
August 30, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
six out of ten doctors agree that you might actually still be alive in five years!
August 30, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if these are the same doctors who recommend Trident for their patients who chew gum...
PEACE
August 30, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if these are the same doctors who recommend Trident for their patients who chew gum...
PEACE
August 30, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think they should just forget about Pallin, and just keep attacking McCain and Bush.
So I like this ad, except I think it's a mistake to make any reference to her, period.
Just keep attacking McCain and Bush and don't get side tracked. There's nothing to be gained by attacking her.
All attacks on her should be oblique until she says or does something really stupid, then a frontal "your no Hillary Clinton" slam will be appropriate.
I think the comedians will tear the Pallin selection to shreds. I'm out of the country, but wish I could see the SNL skits. They can start by paroding this youtube of McCain staring at Pallin's upper body while his wife and children look on (very creepy):
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc5ObA_k2dc&eurl=http://blogd.com/wp/
August 30, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that we should continue with the same narrative. There's a balance to be struck with ignoring Palin, however. If you just talk around her and pretend she's not in the room, there's the risk of appearing sexist and condescending.
August 30, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not only that. It appears cowardly. Like one is afraid to mention her as she's so exciting and all.
This really is the Harriet Miers play. *Who could be so low and indecent as to oppose a woman?* Need to respond, and saying she doesn't matter -- that's fine as one angle I believe.
August 30, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, they should not have put her in the ad at all. I hope they relize this and redo their ad.
August 30, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tim, You should email that youtube link to Cindy.
August 30, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The worst pick in the history of this country. The pick will only energize the lunatic right but scare away the independent. Obama should continue to hammer away on McCain’s age…
The amount of energy among the Democrats is way higher than McCain/Palin combine.
August 30, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
The pick of Palin should be seen at as a retreat by the McCain campaign. They were trying to hold the "experience" line and just had to abandon it. Now we are going to be hearing about what kind of change agents (ahem, "reformers") McCain and Palin are.
The "Change vs. Experience" battle has been won. Obama is setting the narrative and agenda of this election and needs keep marching forward.
August 30, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's a great commercial. Very simple message and ends with the image of McCain and Bush. The fact that the speakers at the convention hammered the 90%/95% of the time message and the McCain never responded to it directly only says that they don't have a good response. And if they did it would require McCain to dis Bush, which only irks the base (and the Palin choice indicates his camp still feels they have to work to keep them happy)
August 30, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, the ad it takes the first stab at defining Palin as... nobody.
August 30, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's irrelevant and the ad asks the voters to check her out for themselves. We're in 2008: one Google search is all the voters need to see the real Sarah Palin. Obama needs only to focus on the real enemy: McCain and his Bush agenda.
August 30, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Overheard in the Oval Office on May 14, 2009:
President McCain: (talking with various advisors about the recent deadly incursion by Armpitistan rebels into oil fields being explored by Exxxon-Mobil) Bob, I agree we can’t let these gook---, I mean these rebels carry on. We have to stop them.
Bob (Exxxon-Mobil VP for Insurgent Affairs): Yes, Mr. President. We gotta get these assholes off our rigs. I’m losing a boatload of money every hour those filthy people are inciting the locals to block my crews.
Biff (Security analyst – affiliation not provided): Give me the word and I’ll get rid of those fuckers within an hour. I got Erik Prince on speed-dial. Him and his boys did great work in the Nigerian delta. We’ll get some backup from Langley and make it look like the Ballsacistanis took them out.
Bob: Can’t happen soon enough for me John.
VP Palin: Uh, Mr. President, I think we need to consider-
President: Hey, Sarah, honey, be a nice girl and get us some more coffee. Tell the steward to bring me more Oreos too. Cindy won’t let me eat them.
VP Palin (fuming quietly exists the room)
President: Great ass on that one. (Laughter fills the room). Now, let’s get Prince on the phone. I’ll talk to him personally.
Bob: So is she any good? (More laughter).
August 30, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
The DNC should ignore plain and focus their attention on McCain...Obama should not let McCain dictate the argument. Attack! Attack! Attack! We've already started the attack on Thursday and it is not the time to go back on it.
August 30, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
O well, in that case, gee, I feel so much better.
I don't get why everyone thinks she's such a sacred cow we have to be careful.
Every Repug businessman in this country had 50 coronaries yesterday when this was announced. Feminists are not going to vote for a fundie nut job. Fundie women won't like the fact that she has a 4 month old special needs infant and she's not taking care of it but running around being a Veep candidate.
IT's silly to start walking on eggshells now, for all love.
August 30, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's camp should ignore her and focus their attention on age of McCain's idea. They need to hammer away at McCain and bring Barney Smith back to the campaign trail...
We are on the right side of every issues and no amount of coy can take this election away from us. Obama should continue to hammer at McCain's housing gaffe. McCain just doesn't get it.
August 30, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's camp should ignore her and focus their attention on age of McCain's idea. They need to hammer away at McCain and bring Barney Smith back to the campaign trail...
We are on the right side of every issues and no amount of coy can take this election away from us. Obama should continue to hammer at McCain's housing gaffe. McCain just doesn't get it.
August 30, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena: Exactly, and that is what the GOP is hoping for, and they will cry sexism, but hey GOP, can't have it both ways.
August 30, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
One presumes that poor Cindy will keep Grampy's stash of little blue pills under lock and key for the duration of the campaign. Given the history of Grampy's philandering eye, Sarah is the type who sends tingles through his loins.
August 30, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, you think McCain chose Palin because she is a snake-handler? At this point, more than drugs would be needed, the only thing he's got that is hardening are his arteries. On the plus side, if he did manage to inflate his McDangle, he's always got Joe and Lindsey around back to assist with the pushin'.
August 30, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
LMAO.
August 30, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ick - visuals...
August 30, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the new People interview:
McCain: I think the important thing was that she's a reformer. She's taken on special interests since she ran for the PTA and the city council and mayor.
She took on the special interests trying to influence the Wasilla PTA! Ahmadinejad is like so totally toast.
link to the whole thing: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20222685,00.html
August 30, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
City council and then Mayor of a town of less than 6000 people. This might be political genius by Rove and Co, but it's downright dangerous. This is quite possibly the worst ticket ever put forward by one of the major parties. For the life of me I can't imagine moderate Republicans, independents and centrists possibly supporting this ticket.
Sarah Palin didn't even know what the VP did not know what the VP did in 2007 and didn't really think about the war as late as mid 2007 because she was too focused on Alaskan matters.
My fear that with two months left, she can speak in tightly scripted talking points, and smile her way though her one debate, where she'll be going in with such low expectations anything less than domination by Biden will be seen as a win for her. I mean 90 minutes, divided between the two candidates and the moderator, she basically has to survive 30 minutes and she'll have passed the test.
Obama has been on the trail for basically as long as she has been Governor and people still like to say they don't know him yet.
August 30, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Obama has been on the trail for basically as long as she has been Governor and people still like to say they don't know him yet."
Amazing point - she's been governor only 2 months longer than Obama has been a candidate.
August 30, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Alaskan matters? What's that, how to keep bears out of the garbage? Or, is it how to insure you have the pork money locked up before supporting the bridge to nowhere? Tip O'Neill said 'all politics is local', so I guess all she saw with that bridge, was that her senator had put the arm on the money, and never gave a thought of how proper (better, improper) it was. That's thinking locally, or more aptly, not seeing the big picture.
August 30, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, yeah, exactly which Special Interests has darling Sarah "taken on?"
August 30, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I mean, like, other than that State Trooper that she took a "special interest" in. ;)
August 30, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I keep hearing this talking point being thrown out there over and over again, but can't seem to find anything to back it up. Anyone have a clue what they mean?
August 30, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can't Stop. Laughing.
August 30, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
The master who repeatedly confused Sunni and Shia? This is a downright dangerous ticket. I do think Gov. Palin was chosen to use as a tool against Obama. "If she can't learn foreign policy in four years...well Barack has only been a senator for four years so how much can he really know now?"
If she's helping to raise money like they profess, I wonder if McCain will opt out of public financing. I mean considering he has not collected any GE money, there would be a wave from donors, including max donations from special interests and their secretaries. Given the Evangelicals are rallied, there is a donor base that likely hasn't been tapped either.
I think McCain/Palin could blow Obama/Biden out of the water financially, especially since Biden really didn't bring any donation base with him.
August 30, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
You worried too much
August 30, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Umm, Thanks for your "concern" Jonzy.
August 30, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a legitimate point. I was wondering why they cared about taking in that money anyway, since they're supposed moving to public financing very soon.
August 30, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is amazing how lockstep the McCain campaign is with the failed Clinton campaign.
She too tried to win on the experience argument. After she failed, she trying to recast herself as a more effective change agent than Obama. She failed at that also (narrowly).
The Palin pick shows that they are following the same path. But if Hillary Clinton could not win the "change" debate, how on earth does the McCain people think he and Palin can win that debate?
They can't.
August 30, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I found the end of this clip to be the most interesting, as Senator McCain attempts to get close to Gov. Palin, she appears to not want that to happen.
August 30, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who can blame her?
August 30, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't attack Palin. Attack Bush/McCain and the extreme right. Don't run away from the extreme word. Talk relentlessly about the future and give specifics related to science, math, higher education, global competitivenes and if they come at us with charges of elitism, own the fact that the US once defined elitism in education, science and global competitiveness. If they ask a question about creationism turn the question around to scientic research. Paint them as in the past, in the dark, out to lunch, and disconnected from the world.
My 87 year old mother had a conversation with her MD yesterday. He voted for Bush twice. He's voting for Obama in November. Republican professionals don't want stupid children either.
August 30, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
For every suburban soccer mom they pick up with this choice, Obama will pick up 1 to 2 independents/moderate Repubs. Most of those who are so freakin enthusiastic were already in McCain's camp, they were just lukewarm supporters.
August 30, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
More breaking Palin criticism: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/30/82113/4808/746/579971
August 30, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, that was horrible!!
August 30, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, game over, IMO.
August 30, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I bet there's more. I'm not surprised to hear this. This is just the beginning of a feeding frenzy... let the media tear her apart, Obama needs to focus like a laser beam on McCain. The worse he can make him look, the worse she will look.
August 30, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly, she's easy pickings, which suggests to me that Rove has thrown her out there in the mix as a red herring to take the pressure off of McCain. Let the MSM and the blogosphere (yep, that's us) snack, while Obama/Biden and their crew dine on McCain. The trick will be to ensure that the MSM doesn't get so distracted w/ the Sarah Palin show that they neglect to shine their spotlight on the McCain issues that need focus.
August 30, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Palin is easy pickings - so much so that I suspect Rove threw her out there as a red herring to keep the focus off of McCain. The blogosphere can snack on the many, many reasons that this woman has no business in the White House - let alone on the campaign trail, while Obama/Biden keep their focus on McCain.
The trick, of course, is keeping issues from both tracks on the front pages of the papers.
August 30, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry about the redundant posts. Is anybody else having problems here? Last night and still this morning. And I'm sure nobody's manning the office up there in NY this weekend....ah well.
August 30, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that clip is a bit of a reach. I get the argument, but you really have to read between the lines. Also, it seemed like she wasn't paying attention to what the idiot radio person was saying. I'm not impressed.
August 30, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, too bad she didn't just hang up. KnowwhatImean??
August 30, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with HusseinTenaX. As long as we don't make sexist attacks, I don't see why we have to go after her lightly.
It's not as though Republicans handled Speaker Pelosi with kid gloves. And this is the VP of the United States -- do you think Putin, Ahmadinejad, or Hu Jintao are going to treat her differently because she's a woman?
August 30, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nah, I say ignore her. Keep going after mcbush, but ignore her as much as possible. It's a no win situation "criticizing" her. The issue is mcbush and more of the same. Criticizing her will be construed as sexist as pointed out above. It's a lose, lose proposition. The same as going after mcbush's pow garbage.
Paint mcbush as a third term and go after their out of touch policies. They have nothing to talk about other than pow, pow, pow and sexist, sexist, sexist. That's what they want, don't feed into it.
August 30, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, Greg:
It would be nice if you start calling on blatant A.P. bias, it has become an absurd platform for G.O.P. The last two days it read like a brochure to know more about the "exceptional" Sarah Palin.
August 30, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, Greg:
It would be nice if you start calling on blatant A.P. bias, it has become an absurd platform for G.O.P. The last two days it read like a brochure to know more about the "exceptional" Sarah Palin.
August 30, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
YES, YES, YES, please. They are like a Karl Rove copy repeater. They need to be called out for this, only one to say anything has again, been Keith Olbermann.
August 30, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't wait for Greg to call them out, you guys can give direct feedback to AP. Send an email to info@ap.org and cite the title of the article, the author, where the article was published (give the URL), the date it was published, and exactly what you think of it.
If you go to the AP website:
http://www.ap.org/pages/contact/contact.html
They provide the addresses and phone numbers for each of their bureau offices and also which offices their writers and editors are assigned to. You can contact writers and editors directly that way if you don't want to use the email address.
Speak your mind!
August 30, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
That ad is pure political genius!
They're waiting for Obama to attack Palin so they can use their chivalrous defense to attack him - a clever trap but the Obama team is thinking several moves ahead.
The ad seems to say: "it doesn't matter that he's picked a brilliant a wonderful running mate - McCain is still in the #1 spot and he still sucks".
This leaves it to the viewer to thing: "But ... I don't know if she's all that brilliant and wonderful ... after all _____ (fill in the blank with the abject terror that we all feel when we imagine Monica Goodling as the president."
Her negatives never need to be spoken - they're obvious:
- no experience
- sounds unthinkably un-presidential
- corruption case
- creationist
- global warming denier
- gaffe prone
I would give her full leeway to talk uncriticized and let her become the gift that keeps on giving.
August 30, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
I think Obama should/will let her and the media dig her own grave.
The gaffes will come. She's not ready for the national spotlight. This is gonna be a meltdown of historic proportions.
And most of all, the best way to attack McCain is to attack his choice of her. He made the mistake of picking a novice. It's not really her fault she's not qualified. It's his. Obama should hit reckless gambler McCain for his unsteady, deeply unwise choice -- he flubbed the biggest decision of his life.
August 30, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain is the "master" who has surrounded himself with the neo-con dead-enders who think Bush hasn't started enough wars.
Palin as VP would offer no counterweight to those advisers. And if she had to succeed McCain, she would be at their mercy -- unless she has some secret foreign-policy cabinet back in Alaska, and a strategic worldview beyond "we need to have a plan here" (re Iraq).
August 30, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
That ad is pure political genius!
They're waiting for Obama to attack Palin so they can use their chivalrous defense to attack him - a clever trap but the Obama team is thinking several moves ahead.
The ad seems to say: "it doesn't matter that he's picked a brilliant a wonderful running mate - McCain is still in the #1 spot and he still sucks".
This leaves it to the viewer to think: "B-b-ut ... I don't know if she's all THAT brilliant and wonderful ... after all _____ (fill in the blank with the abject terror that we all feel when we imagine Monica Goodling as the president."
Her negatives never need to be spoken - they're obvious:
- no experience
- sounds unthinkably un-presidential
- corruption case
- creationist
- global warming denier
- gaffe prone
I would give her full leeway to talk uncriticized and let her become the gift that keeps on giving.
August 30, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the intended reaction is for most people to see that ad and say, "Who is his VP?!?"
It was necessary for the effect, but referring to Sarah Palin as "this", as in "THIS is his VP" could rub people the wrong way. Kind of reminds me of Bill Clinton's referring to Lewinsky as "that woman."
August 30, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Goddam it TPM. When are you going to fix your server problems. Yesterday was pathetic, and today is not much better. It is clear that you can not handle the traffic at key points in the election process. Also, WTF is up with your server system being run from Australia?
Here is what is still going on. Shape up.
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact th
August 30, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, look at all the double posts. I thought it was just my system, but obviously there is a problem.
August 30, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um, this is one grossly irreponsible quote. When I read it on your comment I thought it must be an error or a joke. No, Charlie Black apparently said that??!!
It's actually breathtaking.
1. I wish McCain health and long life, way past 100 years. Her too.
2. He ain't no master of foreign policy as his intemperate crack up Georgia showed, on top of not knowing Sunni from Shia, who's funding whom, and where Iraq's borders are. *Please.*
3. I still can't believe this shatteringly reckless thing was actually said. Stupefying to me.
Thanks.
August 30, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I swear I heard Ms. Palin pronounce the word "nuclear" as "nucular" during her introductory speech to the American people yesterday. Talk about more of the same. . .
August 30, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've heard a lot of people do that recently. Karl Rove didn't surprise me however, I hope my ears were playing tricks, in an interview a week or two ago I thought I heard former Secretary Of Energy Bill Richardson pronounce it "nucular."
August 30, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we could attack the combined policies of their ticket without mentioning name:
anti-abortion even for rape and incest
anti-stem cell research
100 years in Iraq
teaching creationism in schools
denying that climate change is m
August 30, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like this and it sounds exactly in line w/Obama's approach.
August 30, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to know what McCain was drinking when picked Sarah Palin? People are calling her the female Dan Quayle, well, that's an insult to Dan Quayle.
August 30, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he thought it was actually Michael Palin and he was playing the Monty Python angle. . .you know, Ministry of Silly Walks, "naughty bits", etc.
August 30, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
you forgot the ministry of housinge
August 31, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is! Poor Dan!
August 30, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
she'll study at the feet of the master. right where a woman belongs, right, john?
also, i'm guessing the KKK vote is going to like that the mccain campaign things of him as the "master" in this election.
blech, that party is gross.
August 30, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Will she be licking his toes?
August 30, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will she be licking his toes?
August 30, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ewww...my god, the visuals, the visuals...
August 30, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Guys - McLame has blown this sky high and I'll tell you why:
The Repug party is at war with itself - the old line conservatives would like to have their party back and if Mclame had gone that way - we'd be in some trouble. He didn't. He decided to go with the Bush Repugs - and they don't exist anymore except in pockets of fundie wackiness.
ANd this woman won't be able to bring the fundies in, either - not in numbers.
McLame has obliterated his own campaign - he's fucked, utterly.
August 30, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
My wife's aunt, a lovely woman and a very devout Catholic, is in LOVE with Sarah Palin. A pro-life but vaguely spunky woman is exactly what she wants to see.
Protestant fundies love her even more.
I agree that she's going to be a time bomb for McCain, but she does have real strengths with certain segments of the electorate, especially moderate- to-conservative women with a certain kind of dilemma: they don't like war, they're fed up with the asshole men in the Republican party, but they love, love, love those fetuses.
August 30, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alright, Alex, let's play this out a little bit.
Who in the Republican base do you think Palin appeals to and who do you think she might turn off?
And who do you think in the part of the electorate that's "in play" (the 10% that polls as undecided) do you think Palin might pull in for McCain and why?
August 30, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena nails it!
August 30, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to Rassmussen poll, Sarah Palin made a great first impression.
Her favorability rating is higher than Biden's - 53% to 485.
"Palin earns positive reviews from 78% of Republicans, 26% of Democrats and 63% of unaffiliated voters. . . . Among all voters, 29% have a Very Favorable opinion of Palin while 9% hold a Very Unfavorable view."
August 30, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
that is: 53% to 48%
August 30, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rasmussen, c'mon is that best source u can vouch from...lame. No one knows who Palin is or where she stands on the issues. Give it time.
August 30, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
She hasn't done anything yet! People have no idea who she is.
August 30, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. On the unfavorable ratings, she has a way to go still, to catch up with Obama and/or Biden.
The media is busy selling her personal story, so I think she will hold the favorable ratings for a while longer.
I also don't think the TrooperGate will make any difference in the final outcome. Not with Rezko and Wright thrown in for the fair and balanced.
August 30, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you on that. Nobody will give a shit about some questionable goings on up in Alaska. She's a small time politician with small time scandals.
August 30, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just that the findings are to come out just a few days before the election. And by the sounds of it she pissed off the Repubs who will dealing with the investigation and they'll be using it as payback and to make sure she is as diminished as possible in Alaska. It's not right, but it does help Obama.
August 30, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course she has high polling numbers. Because Biden actually, you know, has a history with the American people, he's going to poll lower. People are giving their opinion based on the purty soccer momma with the hot hubby who happens to come from that chilly place up north. Wait till they get to know her better.
August 30, 2008 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give it time. She is really an unknown and they will drop once people get to know her. Also, ratsmussen is at least a 5% if not more right-wing tilt depending on the topic or person. The worst of the worst polling organizations. I am sure if the question was asked properly 90% of the people would state that they don't have a clue about her. Also, I saw that speech and she sucked. Her bio and press play has been head and shoulders above her crappy speech, which probably nobody watched anyway. Leave it to the right-wing media.
August 30, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope they enjoy it. This is the highest those figures will be, unless the dems manage to flub this too. Something tells me the media is going to have a feeding frenzy as details come out and media clips emerge. It will become evident that the convention narrative doesn't jive with the reality. Besides, the convention will have to share the media stage with gustav.
August 30, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The unburnished female voice in the ad is effective.
August 30, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody knows her. Just wait til they get a real taste of her.
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahaha
August 30, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, OT, but I just read an interview on Keira Knightley, and she told the reporter six times to fuck off. Totally made me laugh, as she does it in a very lighthearted manner.
So Palin, fuck off.
August 30, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I think I like her.
August 30, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/J/G/2/sarah-palin-pantsuit.jpg
August 30, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin: ready from day one... thousand.
August 30, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think this really trivializes the real world lives of working mothers. Having 5 kids and one an infant with special needs is no picnic. Has this woman really considered if she even wants to be President of the United States? Who would be next in line? Is it Speaker of the House? That would be an irony getting the other mother of 5, Nancy Pelosi.
August 30, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course it does, bluebell. McLame is insane - women will not vote for her in any numbers. FEminists are not going to vote for a fundie wack job. Fundie mothers will be shocked that she walked out on her 4 month old special needs infant to run for VEEP.
Mclame is fucked. If he'd picked a progressive but old line Repug fiscal conservative - we'd be in trouble. HE didn't - instead he handed us the election.
August 30, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, as long as obama doesn't screw up in the debates, which odds are he won't, we are looking at a huge landslide in november. We all need to keep our fingers crossed.
August 30, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh mentions this:
The fact is, Obama was never making an experience argument, McCain was. Obama can continue his argument, which was about good judgment and the economy. McCain was the one claiming Obama was "dangerously inexperienced" and making it all about foreign policy. I think McCain has confused whose talking points are whose here.
This does nothing whatsoever to address Obama's main critique, which is that McCain knows nothing about the economy.
I do think it is wise to not go after Palin personally. They don't need to. But it is okay to point out the issues where she is just more of the rightwing agenda -- global warming, abortion, etc. She's a radically rightwing ideologue, the choice of the Karl Rove wing of the party.
But the best way to attack this pick is to attack McCain for his poor judgment. He effectively put "country last" for his own cynical political ambitions.
August 30, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Site screwing up. Great quote in the W. Post by visiting Alaska journalist I tried to put up. He was provoked by an e-mailer to Post who said journalist seemed not to like her, and okay, but why?
He said some nice things about her, said she had been 80% popular but now 65% around, but that voters didn't see much of her and if you asked journalists, popularity would be in teens or twenties. No joke.
August 30, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama keeps the local attack strategy:
Today's issue: Subsidies for car makers:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0808/Obama_Revitalize.html#comments
August 30, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
This ad will run in Michigan.
August 30, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice!
August 30, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice.
August 30, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me, or does that ad seem especially powerful after the Democratic Convention?
August 30, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
It perpetuates a strong, proven message, and typical of the Obama camp, it keeps it's eye on the ball.
August 30, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the Obama campaign is absolutely on the right track here with this ad. They don't mention her name. It's just like attack ads: Don't Take The Bait! They understand what the GOP is trying to do.
Strategy
August 30, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is great analysis by Mike Murphy (old McCain strategist) about Palin's effect in Michigan. he knows the ground game there from the Rep side. And yesterday the talking points were that she helps a lot in Michigan. This is good news---
http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/08/the_barracuda_and_the_wolverin.html
August 30, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. Great article in terms of keeping perspective of how the general election is going to play out, and how important the ground game is.
Putting aside everything else, The Barracuda has the potential to fire up the right-wing nuts and their ground game that were the difference in Ohio.
August 30, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have family that lives further north, in Traverse City. Many politicians overlook the area because it's sparsely populated, but I think there is a significant change underway up there. Traverse City and the northern part of the Lower Peninsula has seen a lot of population gains as retirees settle there permanently. And it seems a large part of the population growth is more Democrat than Republican.
The local theater in downtown Traverse City is showing the acceptance speeches for both conventions. Tickets were free, but the ones for Senator Obama's speech were gone within hours. The Republican convention tickes are still only half gone.
I think there are pockets of Democrats in areas outside of Detroit.
August 30, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin's 16 years of experience (according to McCain) is really about 10 years. McCain doesn't even seem to realize that Palin was out of elected office for 5 years.
1992-1996 she served two terms on city council
1997-2001 she served two terms as mayor
Keep in mind the town has less than 6000 people in it.
In 2002 she ran and lost the Lieutenant Governor
She was out of elected office until 2006 when she ran and won the Governor election. She began serving in January 2007.
August 30, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
And, she won a whopping 115,000 votes to be elected governor. Whoppeee. There are more people in brooklyn than the entire state of alaska. Too funny, she has executive experience? Give me a break.
August 30, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even more bizarre, apparently she was pregnant half the time she's been governor. It's just kind of weird to me. No doubt it plays with the wacko end of fundies but what woman consciously makes that kind of choice when just assuming a major new job? What kind of judgment and planning does that demonstrate?
August 30, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll take my chances with Biden's 30 years of expert foreign policy experience vs. Palin who just got the cliff notes version and when they debate will have 30 days experience.
Picking Plain proves yet again McCain will sell out every core conviction and principle he has ever had to pander to get vote
McCain built his career on being a so-called expert on foreign policy and national security. He has tried to tear Obama apart for having no experience or credentials to take on the challenges of today’s' world events.
So what does McCain do? Of course, he sells out once again and picks a hockey mom with NO foreign policy or national security experience NONE to pander to get Hillary votes and to appease the far right wing base of his party who control the republicans every move and thought
August 30, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I smell an Eagleton.
I bet Palin will not make it until Election Day.
August 30, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
My prediction is that unless something really serious comes up that can rival Wright or Rezko, she will stay on and the ticket will be strong.
She has the immunity now of saying: they are doing the same thing to me that they did to Hillary and Geraldine Ferraro.
I think red flags should go up for Democrats and they shouldn't touch anything that smells of sexism with a 10-foot pole.
Especially including the baby story.
August 30, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
YOu are a very silly person.
I'll bet you $1000 to Obama that she isn't even on the ticket in November.
August 30, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're on then. Are you allowed to contribute that much still?
August 30, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
By November, it'll be too late for a $1000 Obama donation to do any good.
Maybe a donation towards retiring Hillary's debt? :-)
August 30, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think her abusing her office for a personal vendetta easily trumps the bullshit "controversy" of Rezko or Wright.
August 30, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
And again it's not the act but the coverup syndrome that will come into play. Goes to the character of the person and whether you can trust him or her.
August 30, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Lalo, I don't know how you can suggest that what Palin is suggested of having done here is small-time, while implying that Obama's connection to Rezko is more nefarious. She appears to have been involved in using the authority of her office to carry out a personal vendetta. Obama simply bought a narrow strip of property from a neighbor - at market price - who later was embroiled in corruption. Obama, himself, did nothing wrong. At the very worst, he's been accused of having been loosely associated with someone who was engaged in wrongdoing. I don't see how you can minimize Palin's problem here, relative to Rezko's thin connection to Obama.
August 30, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin may get some immunity from the fired trooper apparently being a real scumbag.
OTOH, she did have to fire the state police chief to get this done, reminiscent of Elliot Abrams and the Saturday Night Massacre. He seems to be well regarded up there, and he's been doing a lot of stuck-pig-like squealing.
It'll be very entertaining watching how this plays out.
August 30, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno - it all seems to be about exes and personal vendettas with the Palins.
Sarah tries to get her sister's ex fired from the State Troopers. Todd Palin gets a high-ranking aide fired for dating his best friend's ex.
These two look like they'd be more at home on the Jerry Springer Show than the White House.
August 30, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been kinda thinking the same thing. This just seems like such a half-cocked selection (no pun intended). I really wouldn't be surprised if it blows up in McCain's face.
August 30, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was agreeing with the Eagleton comment, not the silly lalo comment.
August 30, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the ad is great!!!
What McCain is trying to do is rebrand his campaign to be an agent of change. By picking Palin he has completely abandoned the "ready to lead" OFFENSE and is now going to try to reclaim his "maverick" personae.
As a result, this ad is perfect in reminding voters that NOTHING has really changed. McCain will just continue to failed policies of Bush.
Biden will NOT be attacking Palin but McCain. Biden is the one who can dismantle McCain's "maverick" appeal. He knows McCain best.
Obama/Biden doesn't have to say anything more about Palin than they already have. The Obama team was initially harsh but totally backed away from that and has now just pivoted to attacking McCain. Let the surrogates (particularly female) attack Palin on her views and lack of foreign policy experience.
Hillary can also be helpful in this campaign by reminding voters "no way, no how, no McCain".
August 30, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the ad is great!!!
What McCain is trying to do is rebrand his campaign to be an agent of change. By picking Palin he has completely abandoned the "ready to lead" OFFENSE and is now going to try to reclaim his "maverick" personae.
As a result, this ad is perfect in reminding voters that NOTHING has really changed. McCain will just continue to failed policies of Bush.
Biden will NOT be attacking Palin but McCain. Biden is the one who can dismantle McCain's "maverick" appeal. He knows McCain best.
Obama/Biden doesn't have to say anything more about Palin than they already have. The Obama team was initially harsh but totally backed away from that and has now just pivoted to attacking McCain. Let the surrogates (particularly female) attack Palin on her views and lack of foreign policy experience.
Hillary can also be helpful in this campaign by reminding voters "no way, no how, no McCain".
August 30, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good ad.
This has probably already been mentioned but it turns out Palin wasn't opposed to the bridge to nowhere:
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/29/did-palin-really-fight-the-bridge-to-nowhere.aspx
this "reformer" line is pretty weak tea. Alaska is an entity unto itself, with govt "handouts" up the wazoo.
She is People-mag-ready with her big family, gun-totin', etc., but c'mon. The fact that McCain has only met her once is just mind boggling to me.
With this pick McCain has shown he is willing to sacrifice the safety of the country in order to win an election.
August 30, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I noticed in her acceptance speech that she referred to Cindy as "Mrs. McCain". Compare that to how the Bidens and Obamas interact, not just politically compatable but they all seem to genuinely like each other. I bet Cindy's gonna hate having that woman around John for the next 2 months.
August 30, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't that there is one thing Obama, Biden or any other Democrat could say about this woman and have people get mad about it - I don't.
I don't care what the Repugs say about:
Obama's experience or lack of it
Obama is picking on Palin cause she's a girl
any damn thing they want to come up with.
Who cares? McLame-Palin is one of the worst jokes the Repugs have ever tried to pull on America and that's exactly how it is going down.
Careful about what Obama says? why? Who cares, beyond about 2000 fundies?
Wake up, my friends - I'm begging you - do not run scared of what the Repugs say about what Obama says - who cares? Look at that ticket - for the love of heaven, please. Americans are not this stupid - I promise!
August 30, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry to be a cynic, but that's what people told me in 2004. =)
Though I certainly agree that Palin will not convince America to vote for McCain, until Obama is in the White House, I'm gonna have a hard time believing that Americans "are not this stupid."
August 30, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I wish you were right, but I don't see any other explanation for what happened in 2000 and 2004, other than alot of stupid americans along with republican games. They did get alot of stupid americans to vote for them though didn't they?
August 30, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, I'm not losing any sleep, I promise you. That stopped Thursday night.
But I think you're overlooking a huge swath of Americans who are what we might call Legally Blond feminists. They don't think of themselves as feminists. They don't want to be the kind of person who cares about "women's issues." But they love to see women who are spunky leaders, as long as they also conform to traditional femininity in other ways.
My wife's aunt, who has a graduate degree and is a very devout Catholic, is in LOVE with Sarah Palin. A pro-life but vaguely spunky woman is exactly what she wants to see.
Protestant fundies love her even more.
I'm not saying "hands off Sarah." But I do think this ad takes the right approach for right now -- saying little to nothing about Palin, and training fire on McCain's agenda.
August 30, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good comment about the Legally Blonds. Here was my take; I tried to post this but the site is acting up badly:
*What kind of woman moves to vote with Palin?*
1. The politically disengaged: They don’t follow this much, they kind of like McCain anyway, and now, it just sounds kind of interesting! Plus they’ve seen her on TV and they kind of like her! Potential big vote. (A sub-group of these people are the truly stupid, but that’s not all of them.)
2. The not-too-bright: Barbie is a beauty contestant, leads the basketball team, then Barbie becomes a sportscaster, poses in Vogue, and becomes Governor. It’s a whole Barbie set, $99.95. Don’t you believe women aren’t attracted to this.
3. PUMA dead-enders. “A man convinced against his will is of his old opinion still.” Some still search for reasons to vote for McCain, despite Hillary’s entreaty. Some are so angry, and incredibly, not against the wealthy un-American usurpers in the White House, but against community organizer Barack Obama. None so blind as those who have eyes and will not see.
4. “Gender feminists”: Excruciatingly polite term for man-hater, misandrist. Got more misandrists per capita in United States than anywhere else. A fairly small vote in themselves, but they partly influence other women’s views (“Why are men such pigs?”).
5. Base +: Otherwise unenergized Republican/rural/Christians, Holy Rollers who might have stayed home. Not that many probably, but every vote counts.
6. Sanctimonious: Catholic abortion-haters, one-issue voters. Biden appeals to Catholics but the real one-issue anti-abortionists go with this dame.
7. The Uninformed: Undecideds who could have been persuaded that their gender was being exploited and that this women was the gender equivalent of an Uncle Tom, not to mention wholly unqualified, but didn’t receive word.
August 30, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, it is not about running scared. It is that we do not even have to go there. It is fighting smart and efficiently.
August 30, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with that and said so yesterday; I keep reading posts on blogs and comments to the posts that say things like: this is an experience trap for Obama - and I think that's utter rot.
I am not saying go after her. I think Barrackarate will handle her. I just don't think there is anything to worry about under any circumstances.
It's the "hair on fire" thing that I think is silly. There's an "experience trap" post on the TPM's front page. I don't think it exists.
I'm not advocating anything - I have never told the campaign what to do.
August 30, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with that and said so yesterday; I keep reading posts on blogs and comments to the posts that say things like: this is an experience trap for Obama - and I think that's utter rot.
I am not saying go after her. I think Barrackarate will handle her. I just don't think there is anything to worry about under any circumstances.
It's the "hair on fire" thing that I think is silly. There's an "experience trap" post on the TPM's front page. I don't think it exists.
I'm not advocating anything - I have never told the campaign what to do.
August 30, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with that and said so yesterday; I keep reading posts on blogs and comments to the posts that say things like: this is an experience trap for Obama - and I think that's utter rot.
I am not saying go after her. I think Barrackarate will handle her. I just don't think there is anything to worry about under any circumstances.
It's the "hair on fire" thing that I think is silly. There's an "experience trap" post on the TPM's front page. I don't think it exists.
I'm not advocating anything - I have never told the campaign what to do.
August 30, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with that and said so yesterday; I keep reading posts on blogs and comments to the posts that say things like: this is an experience trap for Obama - and I think that's utter rot.
I am not saying go after her. I think Barrackarate will handle her. I just don't think there is anything to worry about under any circumstances.
It's the "hair on fire" thing that I think is silly. There's an "experience trap" post on the TPM's front page. I don't think it exists.
I'm not advocating anything - I have never told the campaign what to do.
August 30, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think that there is one thing Obama, Biden or any other Democrat could say about this woman that would do one thing to hurt the Democrats.
I don't care what the Repugs say about:
Obama's experience or lack of it
Obama is picking on Palin cause she's a girl
any damn thing they want to come up with - and they will, anyway - if never so much as mentions her name. Why do y'all worry about this so much? Karl Rove is dead, for all intents and purposes.
McLame-Palin is one of the worst jokes the Repugs have ever tried to pull on America and that's exactly how it is going down.
Careful about what Obama says? Why?
Wake up, my friends - I'm begging you - do not run scared of what the Repugs say about what Obama says - who cares? Look at that ticket - for the love of heaven, please. Americans are not this stupid - I promise!
August 30, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The ad also doesn't even mention Palin. It shows her, but it never mentions her by name. That's the perfect strategy for Obama. For the most part, just ignore her.
August 30, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
People are saying that his VP decision shows McCain to be a maverick. But actually it shows how far McCain has sold out to the neocon base of the party. Palin supported Pat Buchanan, she is further right than Bush. Even Bush admits there is man-made global warming, although he hasn't been willing to address it.
McCain was called a maverick because he stood up against his own party, but this decision was the final nail in the coffin of the maverick image. By choosing Palin, McCain looks pathetically controlled now by the extremists of the party. He is Limbaugh's little bitch.
August 30, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I liked the ad. To the point. Keep showing Bush. And it was very effective using a woman's voice.
I think the Obama camp should let Biden go after the Barracuda. The differences between them are so stark and I think Joe could easily dismantle her hockey-mom, Intelligent Design, anti-choice, pro-gun, pro-drill facade while seeming to appear somewhat genial at the same time.
August 30, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find it horribly irresponsible of McCain to put this woman so close to the presidency, him being a sick old man! So this Palin person has a very good chance of becoming president in the near future if the repugs win the election. Frightening.
August 30, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
NO ONE will touch the baby story, and they shouldn't. She has the right to do whatever she chooses.
Her downfall will not be about her gender. I'm not particularly informed, don't post a lot, and "don't know much about history"....
but I do know (just from what I've read SO FAR) that the RNC/McCain camp did NOT do a good job vetting Gov. Palin.
Troopergate is just the beginning.
August 30, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I highly recommend this critical take on Palin from an Alaskan--check out "What is McCain thinking"
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/what-is-mccain-thinking-one alaskans-perspective/
August 30, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good read.
August 30, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
An excellent explanation of her Troopergate scandal. Yowch.
These guys don't know what's about to hit them on the National Stage. It may be really brutal.
August 30, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
NO ONE will touch the baby story, and they shouldn't. She has the right to do whatever she chooses.
Her downfall will not be about her gender. I'm not particularly informed, don't post a lot, and "don't know much about history"....
but I do know (just from what I've read SO FAR) that the RNC/McCain camp did NOT do a good job vetting Gov. Palin.
Troopergate is just the beginning.
And, by the way, I am a single mom with three kids, three jobs, and have been a feminist since 1973.....no feminist will fall for this pick.
August 30, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fundamentalists are not going to agree with you about her baby - Ok? Evangelical mothers are going to be shocked about it -
If she doesn't want things discussed, then she should get out now.
August 30, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
People are saying that his VP decision shows McCain to be a maverick. But actually it shows how far McCain has sold out to the neocon base of the party. Palin supported Pat Buchanan, she is further right than Bush. Even Bush admits there is man-made global warming, although he hasn't been willing to address it.
McCain was called a maverick because he stood up against his own party, but this decision was the final nail in the coffin of the maverick image. By choosing Palin, McCain looks pathetically controlled now by the extremists of the party. He is officially Limbaugh's little bitch.
August 30, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really think that maybe the conspiracy theory that bushco has something on mcbush may have some validity. He is completely different than he was in 2000. There has to be some explanation. Palin? Right-wing looney. Economic policies - bushco. Endless war - bushco. Somebody is pulling this guy's strings.
August 30, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a single mom, 54, with three kids (10, 11, 13), all adopted, all black (I am white), work two jobs, and have been a feminist since 1973. NO feminist will fall for this pick.
And
no one should touch the kid thing. If she has the support and energy, god fucking bless her.
Her downfall will not be because of gender, it will be because the McCain campaign failed to vet her properly. Troopergate is only the beginning, I think.....
August 30, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
hey y'all Nate Silver has excellent analysis of the Rassmussen numbers on Palin--surprise surprise: Women are very skeptical of her being ready and the moderates and liberals do so by big margins. Only conservatives (men especially) think she is ready. She moves the numbers very little.
August 30, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Consertive men think with their dicks.
August 30, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
... e.g, cheney
August 30, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the grand scheme of things this is a minor point, but I'm rather excited about the Bush WH's attack on science ending.
So it's so not wonderful to see a creationist placed on the ticket.
My dream Town Hall question....
"Governor Palin, how old is the earth?"
August 30, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
All Biden would have to say is that is exactly how I would have went at a male candidate with zero foreign affairs experience and expecting me to take it easy on her because she is a women is sexist. This is a dangerous world, and Sarah Palin being a heartbeat away from the Presidency is dangerous for all of us.
Tomorrow is promised to nobody, not Joe Biden, not Barack Obama and not John McCain. The primary role, the most important role of a Vice President is to be ready from day one to be able to step in and be President.
Palin didn't even have a passport until 2007 when she got one so she could go to Kuwait to visit Alaskan National Guard troops (by the way she posed for pictures there)
August 30, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
O my god - is anyone working on trying to fix this blog? Josh, I know that page hits is your goal - well, that presupposes that your blogging host can handle the traffic -
So????
Could someone even acknowledge the problems? Y'all are silent on this and it's unbearable -
August 30, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, I think you're extremely insensitive. This server was a POW for five and a half years.
August 30, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another reason Obama MUST become president: he's promised to fix the TPM server once and for all.
August 30, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG. He just got my vote!!
I've been torn the last couple of days. Sarah Palin did charm me, I have to admit. I have a thing for glasses, I'm reassured by the idea of a VP who doesn't hit bystanders when she goes hunting -- and most of all, I loved it that her vigorous pointing gestures nearly made McLame fall backwards.
But my ambivalence is over. Server capacity, for me, is a bottom-line issue.
August 30, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I see it, the primary reason for this choice is to excite his base, to ramp up the lagging enthusiasm gap in the ground game. After the announcement, Dobson and Limbaugh were on board. The campaign reports raising over three million dollars after the announcement.
Other reasons are to make a play for the woman vote, to take on the reform and change mantle, and to shake things up in the narrative. It has nothing to do with governing but all to do with winning at all costs.
August 30, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but what did Obama raise after that speech?
August 30, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of the things I liked about Obama speech was when he brought up abortion, guns and gays. It was: I'm a Democrat and I'm Proud, damnit.
I was wondering to what extent it would be beneficial (or not) for Obama to go after McCain (not Palin) on abortion. McCain really sidesteps in terms of providing quotes about what he will do when president on this issue. Should Obama go after him so they can get an ad up with McCain saying on the campaign trail "I will appoint judges that will overturn Roe vs Wade." And what about stem cell research, is he going to veto that or not.
August 30, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is as good a choice for Veep as Harriet Miers was for the Supreme Court.
August 30, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Politico has a great article that talks about what McCain picking Palin says about him.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12997.html
1. He's desperate.
2. He's willing to gamble, big time.
3. He's worried about the political implications of his age.
4. He's worried about the conservative base.
5. It's McCain being McCain.
August 30, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, putting America First, he is...
August 30, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Country First!
You Cities can go fuck yourselves!
... except maybe Nashville.
August 30, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
as the day goes by I am getting happier and happier. The excitement for those at the front of the right wing is wearing off. Ross Douhat, the boy genious at the Atlantic and pusher of Sam's Club Republicans was ecstatic yesterday. Just go through his blog and you will see this. Today he has sobered up. It is sinking in that the 'executive experience' argument is bs and that this woman is not ready. He is grudging in accepting this with words like 'might' etc. But this means the reality of this pick is sinking in. Which is more good news.
August 30, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ooo - Dobson is on board - just like I thought; the Repugs fucking panicked last week and they have lept right into the fire with this Veep choice. They are counting on the religious right electing them.
The religious right is not a majority by any stretch of the imagination.
Women won't vote for her - at least, not sane women.
August 30, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
With the U.S. Economy and most of the economies of the World in turmoil, with Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and now Georgia in flames, with a second Katrina threatening, with famine in Darfur, now comes an Alaskan bimbo with no credentials to be Vice President to a candidate with geriatric deficits mentally, flagging health physically and questionable finances----. What the hell is he thinking? Is/was Mitt Romney too cerebral for McCain?, too difficult to manipulate? not that I'm a fan of Romney. Was his friend Joe Lieberman too what? It is terrifying to consider what can happen to our country with this duo in office-- what the walking brain-fart can do, or not do at 3am. What can happen to our Economy if the market crashes and McCain having admitted to a dismal lack of any knowledge of Economics. And lastly the thought of Cindy and Bimbo sharing the same house. yikes, yikes, yikes, and let us Pray.
August 30, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was no fucking way McCain was going to choose someone as tall as Romney.
August 30, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
With the U.S. Economy and most of the economies of the World in turmoil, with Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and now Georgia in flames, with a second Katrina threatening, with famine in Darfur, now comes an Alaskan bimbo with no credentials to be Vice President to a candidate with geriatric deficits mentally, flagging health physically and questionable finances----. What the hell is he thinking? Is/was Mitt Romney too cerebral for McCain?, too difficult to manipulate? not that I'm a fan of Romney. Was his friend Joe Lieberman too what? It is terrifying to consider what can happen to our country with this duo in office-- what the walking brain-fart can do, or not do at 3am. What can happen to our Economy if the market crashes and McCain having admitted to a dismal lack of any knowledge of Economics. And lastly the thought of Cindy and Bimbo sharing the same house. yikes, yikes, yikes, and let us Pray.
August 30, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena......I see what you are saying......there will be lots of judgment out there, and if it helps Obama/Biden to raise it, fine......I'm just saying that there is so much else to talk about with Palin, I'm not sure it's necessary....
whether anyone says it out loud, those who disagree will still be THINKING about it. As someone who wishes she didn't have to work full-time at a job that's ok, and could devote myself to the job I love........anyone who gets to pursue their passion should do it. My kids are my life, but if Mommy ain't happy, ain't no one happy.
August 30, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
With the U.S. Economy and most of the economies of the World in turmoil, with Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and now Georgia in flames, with a second Katrina threatening, with famine in Darfur, now comes an Alaskan bimbo with no credentials to be Vice President to a candidate with geriatric deficits mentally, flagging health physically and questionable finances----. What the hell is he thinking? Is/was Mitt Romney too cerebral for McCain?, too difficult to manipulate? not that I'm a fan of Romney. Was his friend Joe Lieberman too what? It is terrifying to consider what can happen to our country with this duo in office-- what the walking brain-fart can do, or not do at 3am. What can happen to our Economy if the market crashes and McCain having admitted to a dismal lack of any knowledge of Economics. And lastly the thought of Cindy and Bimbo sharing the same house. yikes, yikes, yikes, and let us Pray.
August 30, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that I may have figured out the mcbush strategy. He is going to announce at the convention that he is only running for one term and that Palin will learn how to run the country and national security at the hands of "the master." Then in 2012, it will be Palin for the republicans against the clintons. Why else would Black say this:
Here's what long-time McCain Charlie Black told the New York Times about concerns over Sarah Palin's inexperience: "She's going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years, and most doctors think that he'll be around at least that long."
Now, that would explain alot and explain the hail mary pass. Why didn't black say 8 years, he only said 4 years. I'll bet a lunch on it.
August 30, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lots of ladies might think Miss Sarah is spunky and cute as heck.
But most people aren't looking for Katie Couric to run the free world, as it were.
August 30, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will not vote for or against a candidate because of the way they pronounce "nuclear".
August 30, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will not vote for or against a candidate because of the way they pronounce "nuclear".
August 30, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will not vote for or against a candidate because of the way they pronounce "nuclear".
August 30, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena. I see what you are saying, and I suppose everything is fair game. I'm just not sure that evangelical women will judge her. Evangelical MEN, YES. Women, especially mothers, may less judgment. I think it will be men who will go to town on her for running.........
AND....I think ALL of us, even those of us with 5 kids and kids with special needs...still get to have choices.
August 30, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone's focused on the gender issue with Palin. The real trap to avoid may be her small town background and "country" demeanor. The Republicans must be salivating at the thought of Democrats calling her a hick.
Be careful where all those moose jokes end up.
August 30, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Major upsides of the Palin pick: Tina Fey is going to hate being compared to Sarah Palin, so I expect we'll get some good zingers in the first episode of 30 Rock.
Also, this is a gift from God for Kristin Wiig. She can do those northwestern vowels, and reproduce that cheerfully crazed look, while towering over whatever poor sh*t they get to play McCain.
August 30, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your comment is approooved!!!
August 30, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree. I'm in love with Kristen Wiig and if there's a role than will take her to stardom, this is it.
I can't wait for a Wiig-Pohler duel as Palin and Hillary.
August 30, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I need to answer some things addressed to me on the thread and make something clear: when did I ever advocate telling the Obama campaign what to do? I'm not saying attack her. I'm addressing all the to me strange blog posts and comments saying this is an experience trap, we have to be careful, etc.
The Obama campaign will handle this brilliantly. I have no doubt.
But for all those ladies - "legally blonde whatevers" who think she's cute as heck and spunky, there are millions of Americans who do not want Katie Couric as Leader of the Free World.
August 30, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
There were twice as many people at her annoucement yesterday (15,000) than in the town were she was a mayor (7,000).
I just hope that the women voters see this for what it is, a gimmick. Palin aint Hillary. She cant even hold Hillary's pants suit. Hillary has a 35 yr record, Palin just got into politics. A few years ago she was picking up her children from soccer practice for goodness sakes.
August 30, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
15k really? Where did you hear that? Any pics? All I saw were close ups, indicating not many people.
August 30, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
There were twice as many people at her annoucement yesterday (15,000) than in the town were she was a mayor (7,000).
I just hope that the women voters see this for what it is, a gimmick. Palin aint Hillary. She cant even hold Hillary's pants suit. Hillary has a 35 yr record, Palin just got into politics. A few years ago she was picking up her children from soccer practice for goodness sakes.
August 30, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Katie Couric as leader of the free world?
*ack*
Governor Palin will also self-destruct, as Katie is doing......
August 30, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I completely agree with your comment about women making choices. She does not get a free pass on that child of hers, dammit. She would not give another woman a pass on that - count on it.
She chose to have that baby. The baby is 4 months old. I think it is a very poor choice for a woman to knowingly give birth to a special needs child, brag about it, and then leave it and the rest of the kids for someone else to deal with and go be Vice President of the U.S.
If you are anti-abortion and have those kids, then by god, they are your responsibility.
August 30, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
"If you are anti-abortion and have those kids, then by god, they are your responsibility."
Amen, sistah! So much for Republican "family values."
August 30, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
here is an interesting youtube video comparing Obama and Reagan's celebrity....could appeal to republicans and independents.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfKXVDbvkoQ
August 30, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
The new ad is exactly the right way to respond. McCain wants people to believe that his selection of a woman, who is supposedly a reform government type, shows that he is an agent of change. Rather than talking about experience, we should point out that what he has in fact done is pick someone acceptable to the most right wing elements of the GOP and he is using her gender to try to detract attention from that. That is why it was her instead of Pawlenty (and the belief that she it will be more difficult for Biden to attack her rather than Pawlenty). If he were really an independent/maverick he would have picked Tom Ridge, who is clearly whom he wanted to pick, but John McCain wasnt willing to stand up to the GOP right and once more as he has throughout the campaign, he has abandoned his prior principles for politics. Thus, this is not change. Rather, it is the same old cynical politics.
August 30, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's absolutely no NEED for Democrats to go on the attack against this woman. Just hand her the microphone and let her talk...and talk and talk and TALK!!! Let her proudly display her ignorance and extremism (Global warming is not man-made; morning-after pills for rape victims = baby murder; etc.) for the whole world to see. Give her as much airtime as possible (preferably intercut with footage of Sally Field blubbering "You like me! You really like me!"). Ask her how, as a "reformer," she would address the problem of *politically motivated firing* of District Attorneys. No need to engage in name-calling. Just start rolling out the rope.
August 30, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Tough to resist reacting, though.
August 30, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The convention bounce has stabilized with Obama up 4 in the 3-day Rasmussen and up 8 in the 3-day Gallup for 2 days in a row. According to Gallup, Friday night polling for Obama (after the speech and Palin) was lower than on Thursday night (mostly before Obama's speech).
In 1988, Dukakis came out of his convention ahead by 17 points and he ended up losing by 8 points to Papa Bush -- a 25 point swing.
At the end of the GOP convention that year (at which Quayle was picked), the race had gone back to even. Then, Dukakis gave his disastrous death penalty answer in a debate and Dukaakis never led again (despite Bentesen crushing Quayle in their debate).
Next week, the GOP gets its turn at bat and when their convention is over, I assume the race will be back to even. We'll see.