« GOP Rep. Raising Cash Off China-Cuba Oil Myth? | Home | Obama Campaign Accepts Proposal For Three Presidential Debates »

Election Central Saturday Roundup

Obama: McCain Team Aren't Racist -- They're Cynical
Speaking to reporters today in Florida, Barack Obama said the McCain campaign has tried to district voters from the real issues by focusing on his background. "In no way do I think that John McCain's campaign is being racist, I think they're being cynical," Obama said.

Obama In Florida Today
Barack Obama is in Florida today, where he's speaking before the National Urban League's annual convention -- a minority audience where the racial tensions of the current campaign are surely on many people's minds. John McCain spoke there yesterday, and was received politely.

McCain Off The Trail Today
John McCain has no public events scheduled for today.

Obama Offers Support For Energy Compromise -- Including Offshore Drilling
Barack Obama has shifted his position somewhat on offshore drilling, telling the St. Petersburg Times that he could support the "Gang of Ten" energy compromise unveiled yesterday by a group of Republican and moderate Democratic Senators: "My attitude is that we can find some sort of compromise." In addition to supporting offshore drilling, the proposal would also fund alternative energy sources and further other policy goals typically favored by Dems.

Poll: Ted Stevens Losing To Democratic Candidate By A Landslide
Another poll in Alaska, this time from local firm Ivan Moore Research, shows indicted GOP Sen. Ted Stevens' political fortunes plummeting in the wake of his indictment. Stevens remains a safe bet to win the Republican primary, leading his closest challenger by 40 points -- but in the general election against Democratic Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich, Steven is trailing by a whopping 56%-35% margin.

Poll: McCain Up In Missouri
A new SurveyUSA poll gives John McCain a 49%-44% lead in the perennial swing state of Missouri, not significantly changed from a 50%-43% lead in late June. Other recent polls have given Barack Obama the lead here, making the reality of the situation something of an unknown.

McCain's "Country First Concert" Only Gets Hundreds Of People
Despite having the free entertainment of country music star John Rich, premiering his new song paying tribute to the candidate, the Washington Post reports that a McCain rally in the Florida Panhandle was only able to attract several hundred people. That's just a tiny fraction of the thousands of people who typically show up for John Rich at his own concerts -- meaning that John McCain is a serious drag on any marquee bill.


104 Comments

| Leave a comment

I am a strong supported of Senator Obama, but I have to say that I am very disappointed about his decision to compromise on offshore drilling...

Intellectually, It does not make any sense.

There is no indication that offshore drilling will help to reduce the pricing 10 to 15 years from now...

Any takers?

Actually, I think it's a bit misleading to say Obama supports offshore drilling. He supports an energy bill that happens to include offshore drilling.

The Republicans support it very strongly, and the issue is that without having that in the bill, how easily do you think the bill would pass?

I have seen no endorsement by Obama for offshore drilling, just saying he can live with it being part of the greater energy package.

"If it is part of an overarching package, then I am not going to be rigid in preventing an energy package that goes forward that is really thoughtful and is going to really solve the problem."

It may be misleading, but being misleading never stopped a GOP attack before, or stopped the MSM from running said attack.

Obama better be ready to get out in front of the eventual attack. He should already have responses and ads ready, and should have all Sunday morning surrogates prepared on this issue.

user-pic

I live along the beautiful Northern California coastline.  If you've never driven Hwy 1 along the coast, you might not realize what a spectacular national treasure it is -- quite comparable to Yosemite.

But as long as the bill retains the local-veto option (states get to choose whether or not to allow drilling), I can live with it.  No CA politician would dare allow drilling here.

i believe in the bill they can't drill in the pacific and northeast............

Plenty of drilling rigs visable off the Santa Barbara coast. I don't like them, but they're there, along with a fair bit of seepage on the beaches which may be naturally occuring.

user-pic

I think if you read his statement about it very carefully you'll feel better.

Obama Offers Support For Energy Compromise -- Including Offshore Drilling

That's unfortunate. But I guess the reality of it is that to get the right legislation passed elsewhere, one must support a compromise including offshore drilling. But it's truly unfortunate that there's even that much support for such a bullshit gimmick.

McCain's "Country First Concert" Only Gets Hundreds Of People

Ahahaha! That's just AWESOME. The immediate contrast of crowds of hundreds of thousands of people for Obama... to just hundreds for McCain. And in FLORIDA, no less, a state where McCain has typically done better than Obama. That's just beeeautiful

Apparently Floridians are tired of being panhandled.

user-pic

If the fans don't wanna come out to the ballpark, no one can stop 'em.  --Yogi Berra

Smarter than the average Berra.

user-pic

No one will vote for Obama; he's too popular.

It's a smart move. It robs the GOP of their drill everywhere1!!1 demagoguery while Obama gets to advocate for more of what we really need: investment in renewables, conservation, etc.

Besides, if there are already millions of acres currently untapped, what are the odds the offshore locations will have anything worth extracting? Obama's just calling the GOP's bluff here.

Excellent points! You get it!

Definitely true.

Lets face it, beyond the POW experience, there's nothing particularly compelling in John McCain's biography. The most newsworthy event in McCain's twenty-five plus years of political life is his involvement in the Keating Five scandal. We are often told that he's a maverick, but strangely there's nothing to actually support that myth. McCain is little more than a footnote, soon to be a trivia question on Jeopardy.

McCain has never provided great leadership. He's never inspired the public to get involved. There's no eloquent speech that McCain has given on some grand issue. There's no moment in his political history where he went out on a limb to help the little guy, or some wise piece of legislation with his name on it that we all give great thanks for. How do we know these things? Because if there were a whiff of these things in McCain's past, the media would be telling us about them ad nauseam, and McCain would certainly have them in his ads.

Is there any wonder why McCain gave up so quickly in trying to present his own biography and instead has devoted most of his ad time attempting to damage the biography of Barack Obama?

user-pic

Beautifully stated! Can I steal it?

user-pic

Kaneblues says:


"...plus years of political life is his involvement in the Keating Five scandal. We are often told that he's maverick..."

The idea that McCain is a "maverick" is presented by the media as something unique. Arlen Specter was the original maverick, if there really is such an animal. Who is more of a Maverick than Democrat Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska? I'd bet that Nelson votes against his party more than McCain against his. Senator Pryor is another one.
Casey of PA. Take your pick, the Senate if full of Mavericks on the Dem side.


Aren't the 30 or 40 Blue Dog Democrats in the House mavericks?

To continue to refer to McCain as a maverick while ignoring others who are equally, and in some cases, moreso, is misleading.

Regarding Missouri, I had a look at the crossover and I am kinda surprised to see that there is a 20 points gap difference in favor of McBushSame, this is really odd, especially when nationally there is a gap of 4 - 5%

Any takers?

user-pic

I don't get what you're referring to...

Independents I think.

The off-shore drilling is a non-issue other than as a political tool - it's basically a pander. Obama came out on the wrong side and took a hit for it, and will take another hit because the compromise will be sold as a blatant flip-flop by those with an agenda to see it framed as such. Obama has to explain his compromise, whereas labeling it an easily repeatable flip-flop is all that is needed by the Right.

You "allow" off-shore drilling but leave it up to individual states to decide this way the non-coastal interior states are happy because you are looking out for their gas expense and the coastal states are happy because of the NIMBY principle no coastal state will allow off-shore drilling.

Besides, off-shore drilling would only give the gas companies more money unless the next government planned to nationalize Big Oil.

Obama on Florida today about Republicans:

“They’re very good at negative campaigning– they’re not so good at governing.”

That's the slogan he should assume for now on.

user-pic
the Washington Post reports that a McCain rally in the Florida Panhandle was only able to attract several hundred people.

That's embarassing. Wonder how it was covered in the local media?

user-pic

Without the media presence, the numbers would have been significantly less

Obama should demand that McCain make an apology now- to the American people. The challenges our country is facing are too big and too serious to be handled by a petty old man who resorts to low and crude attacks.

Obama is tough enough to handle it- hell, he took on both Clintons and won. But America deserves better than the tripe McCain has too offer. Demand an apology to the laid-off worker, to the soldier, to the veteran, to the broke college student, to the senior citizen. These folks deserve a mature discussion of the issues that will affects their lives. Johnny boy doesn't seem able to handle it.

Demand it now, and start a counter on the DNC website (repubs love those counters) and keep demanding it until the very first debate. Then watch the meltdown of all meltdowns. This is the offensive stance Obama needs to take, and he needs to do it now.

Demanding an apology would only make him look like a whiner. "Somebody call an ambulance, my feelings are hurt!"

Dismissing the McCain tactics as a cynical political ploy is (a) honest and (b) makes McCain look desperate. It is a much better response for the moment. If it looks like McCain is getting traction, they might need to reconsider.

I like the apology thing. Because it will set the narrative for the week. McCain will be on the defensive (for once) and Obama will not look like he is going negative since its an apology for the American people.

Reporters will absolutely love getting to ask "Do you feel you owe the American people an apology?"

No, it would just make Obama look hyper-sensitive. Better to say the McCain campaign is acting childish and move on.

user-pic

i'm with the rat. belittle mcCain, don't ask him for something.

Agree to disagree. I do see your points, however subtle belittling does not get MSM airtime.

user-pic

Nope. He'll get branded as "rattled".

One of the themes floating around in traditional media's heads is that Obama is cooler than a cucumber under pressure. He's got to maintain that.

Very possible.

It is kind of unfortunate how conceptions about Obama paint him into a corner (cool under pressure, not negative etc.) Whereas McCains McMaverickiness allows him to do what he wants, whenever he wants, at all times.

user-pic
Whereas McCains McMaverickiness allows him to do what he wants, whenever he wants, at all times.

But of course! IOKIYAR rules!

user-pic

I think BigO should steal a page from Patrick McGoohan in The Prisoner and apologize -- on behalf of McSame!

I have a confession to make.  I confess that number two is unmutual!

Isn't it odd that in Missouri, that McBushSame would get 55% of independants voters and Senator Obama only 31%?

Missouri is a pretty conservative state. The fact that people responding to an automated survey describe themselves as independent might only mean that they aren't registered Republicans, not that they are equally likely to vote for a Democrat, particularly one who doesn't look like the other guys on currency... but maybe that's just being cynical.

Most Independent men, emphasis on men, lean Republican, sad but true. I guess they must really like Lou Dobbs or something. Just kidding.

Good article:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080724/NEWS15/80724050/1215

Seems to me Obama should shore up Independent men and his Democratic base. Then we'd really be flying high, though don't get me wrong, we are in a very good place right now.

While he may have taken a hit this week in the eyes of the MSM, the Intrade crowd still has him over 60% and quite frankly, I think that's more telling than any razzle dazzle daily tracking poll at this stage of the cycle.

I don't know about that. McCain's attacks aren't necessarily targeting the intrade/internet crowd.

user-pic

Yesterday, people were wailing about Obama being down in the Intrade numbers. Now that he's back up, the Intrade numbers don't matter?

I can't speak for the "everybody" from yesterday, but I wasn't part of that everybody either. Intrade is for the internet savvy crowd to play with, and for that reason I'd give much more weight to phone polling, and even then I don't give that too much consideration right now.

user-pic

McCain's "Country First Concert" Only Gets Hundreds Of People
Despite having the free entertainment of country music star John Rich, premiering his new song paying tribute to the candidate, the Washington Post reports that a McCain rally in the Florida Panhandle was only able to attract several hundred people.

It's the Hicks in the Sticks Tour, '08!!!

Oh well, from what I understand the Lollapallooza lineup sometimes sucks too.

Didn't you get the GOP memo - big crowds are a bad thing. All that this concert size proved is that John McCain isn't a celebrity.

Hopefully they will start doing some debates soon and get back to some real issues.

FISA, Iraq, and now off shore drilling.

Another Obama sellout.

Is it too late for Hillary to be the nominee?

Is it too late for Hillary to be the nominee?

Yep. But keep your Hope for Change alive!

user-pic

Yes, it's too late. And I don't know what gives you the idea that Hillary wouldn't support it as well. After all, she flogged that phony "gas tax holiday" which had the same aim - to try to convince people that she had a plan to bring down gas prices. To be fair, this idea of drilling our way to lower prices is just as dishonest, since both start from the premise that the problem is that oil is too expensive, when really the problem is that we are continuing to remain dependent on a dwindling resource. From that standpoint, at least this proposal offers some funding for addressing that real problem through alternative energy sources...unlike the phony gas tax holiday.

offshore drilling is not big issue to me because i look at the bigger picture, we can now start mass producing fuel efficient cars and trucks, alt. energy including wind and solar... i'm sure some may call it a flip flop i call it compromise because both sides get something... i think this could hurt mccain because 1. a major talking point is gone. 2. obama endorse it first and will mccain FOLLOW obama on this compromise. 3. when repubs call obama a flip flop he can say he didn't receive over million dollars from oil companies then change his mind like mccain did and this was bipartisan....

Excellent points!

Obama in person comes off as calm and sensible, exuding intelligence, humor and good will.

The negative stereotypes can only take hold for people who never hear him or see him speak.

You mean low-information voters? Don't underestimate them, they are a perpetual majority.

user-pic

Support for comprimise my ass! He's caving in in advance like a good compliant centrist corporate Democrat is supposed to. He can't stand up to even the slightest pressure and be for what is right. It's disheartening in the extreme.

He's going to screw the American people to the wall with his capitulationist crap. My God, he's not even elected and he's caving in to Republican pressure on tiny stuff. Oy!

Get ready folks, Obama and Gen. Patraeus will end up being BFF and we'll be firmly in Iraq when BO runs for re-election on the slogan "Keep Hoping! Someday you may get your wish!"

simma down now!

--Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.

Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.--

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25974097/

It's called compromise, people. Obama is saying the gas crisis is just that, and he's willing to compromise with Republicans to get part of a broader package through. Basically saying, I give you LIMITED offshore drilling, you give me renewable energy subsidies, etc.

I'm not thrilled about offshore drilling, however, I think this sort of compromise is EXACTLY what Washington needs right now. I can live with drilling, if and only if, it gets the ball going on other more renewable options. (Also keep in mind that some offshore lands are available right now- so we wouldn't necessarily have to give the oil co.'s more land for their coffers.)

We haven't had it in a while, but this is bipartisanship in action.

Personally, I think natural gas makes the most sense. I can't argue against compromise though.

http://www.drillingplace.com/catalog/us_geologic_province_map.jpg

i couldn't agree more...................

user-pic

let's see what they end up with. if we're lucky, it will have enough for the dem wing of the dem party (major $$ for alternative fuels, deference to states/serious enviro regulation on drilling) that mcThuseleh will vote "no" along with, say, 30 other Rs (i daresay even traitor joe might support such a bill). that would make obama look like a bipartisan leader.

or it's a BS bill that both support. this would make obama look like a follower. if there isn't a big bone thrown the left, mcWar could win this issue.

user-pic

You are rationalizing what he's done.

This is the campaign. He ain't in the White House... and may well never be if the campaign keeps on in this direction.

Do you see the other side "compromising" on their positons on anythng? Of course not. Know why? Because any inconsistency is seen as weakness by normal people---and sometimes normal people get it right. And parenthetically, they also know Democrats are pussies and will bend easily under the slightest pressure on almost any subject including the spoiling of our coasts for oil that won't do a God Damned thing to alleviate gas prices now or ever. In this case the cave in is part of a well known pattern of Democratic behavior in Washington: not having the balls to stand up for what they say they believe in.

Compromise later and in return for something for Christ's sake! Each flip flop like this weakens Obama's campaign. The other side whines and Obama responds just like Reid and Pelosi! Remember them? The ones who have lead Congress to historic low ratings in popularity and approval because of their pathetic weakness and inability to do anything they were elected to do.

It's sickening to see this happening with Obama now. It will be a great deal worse if he manages not to lose the election, which I'm doubting more with each passing day. He's just another DC Democrat interested in himself and getting in with the rich and powerful. It's as plain as day.

Well, I'd like to think I'm not rationalizing him, rather he is doing something rational, politically rational, but rational none the less.

All I'm saying is compromise is give and take, and when it comes to things like this, a crisis, we have to be willing to do go down that round. To do so otherwise benefits absolutely no one. Obama, I think, realizes this as well. With this plan he wants limited drilling (hopefully on lands the oil co's already lease). In exhange we would hopefully get some real funding, subsidies, etc for alternative fuels, cleaner automobiles, etc. A real compromise. We leave it to Washington to get this done and done right.

As far as McCain goes- all I see him doing is flip-flopping and floundering, trying to appease his conservative (and corporatist base), yet keep his more centrist maverick history (pre-9-11) as well. The results make him look dishonest, unsure, and incapable.

No, the Republicans will more than likely NOT want to compromise on anything. For that, they are going to pay dearly at the voting booth, which again strikes back to why Obama is doing this and doing it now.

Is this totally political? Of course, Obama is a politician and this is politics. However, this is smart politics, looking for real compromise and real results. I don't think you can claim the same of John McCain's multiple position shifts- they just can't be trusted. He can't even explain them, he just insists they've always been that way. At best he'll say nothing is off the table, which at it's worst is what Obama has here and with more detail.

I'm parsing the change in position (or flip-flop) here, that I realize. It's up to you if you think all flip-flops are bad or if some changes in position are warranted in order to get things done (solutions). Also, in how you are going to use the terminology and in what contexts.

last paragraph is more towards everyone in general, and not you specifically oleeb. off on tangent!:)

also, i'm pretty much progressive on everything, so I totally understand where you are coming from. for me, i think energy policy is something we really do have to compromise on though. we pick our battles, i guess.

Its actually a very shrewd political move by Obama. Even with Congressional approval of drilling, I think the states still need to lift their ban on it before anything can start and that remains unlikely. By supporting this he takes away McCain's only energy proposal while funding alternative energy. That's one less line of attack for them and McCain's agenda becomes even flimsier.

I was initially confused by the big buys for the Brittney ad. I do not think it will be cost effective ad that convinces many people to change their minds. I still think the target is the media and the goal is to set this "celebrity" narrative. However, I had an epiphany this morning. It's all about the convention. I think McCain is hoping that he can get the media to put a negative spin on Obama's convention speech in front of 70,000 people.

Well I didn't read it? Dawg?

Oh you read it alright.

I'm having another epiphany. You're a total dick.

for mr. hussein.

Conversely, McCain's comparatively dismal turnout is PROOF that he is a superior candidate!

Jeez, it sounds like McCain's campaign is being run by pretentious music critics. "The Velvet Underground never sold many records, but they were WAAAAAY COOLER than the Beatles, man!"

One can only hope he starts referencing bands from the 60's

Bix Beiderbecke was SO MUCH BETTER than Satchmo!

Music comparisons are completely subjective. I would be inclined to say they were both great. I agree that in popular culture, popularity is often inversely proportional to quality, since mass appeal tends to require pandering to a lower common denominator.

user-pic

Supa, I take you at your word, but I had the same thought yesterday as well. I would bet Obama's professionals realized what was going on about a minute after they saw the ad. There are no way to copyright a good thoughts.

Yes very likely they knew right away. In fact they probably predicted the "celebrity" attack line coming.

McCain is taking today off. Even loose cannons need their nap time.

lol

user-pic

Voter in Florida today from Obama's town-hall:

"The media says you don't get substance, but he answered everyone's questions with substance."

Could there be a more perfect sentence that captures the state of the race?

More here:

http://strategy08.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/the-media-says-you-dont-get-substance-but-he-answered-everyonewith-substance/

Hahahahahahhahahahaaaaa, no wonder McCain is so angry and acting so childish in attacking Obama's "celebrity", lol, he is jealous as hell!!

This past week of McCain ads is just the beginning. By the end of the month many voters will come to view Obama as an arrogant elitist who has no experience. If the Obama campaign doesn't come up with an effective strategy to combat the McCain swiftboating, and put it in place NOW, it will be all over by September.

You want elitism?

Standing on the patio of Gallagher's home, McCain made his usual fundraiser jokes about being welcomed "into this modest, middle-income tract home." After Gallagher murmured about the possibility of a tax break, the senator continued, "These public housing projects are quite remarkable."

Gallagher's home abuts a country club golf course and is located just a couple of houses away from that of Denver Broncos owner Pat Bowlen. It featured the usual trappings of a fancy estate: gurgling fountains, manicured topiaries and elaborate fencing.

http://www.coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6834

Somehow I think those who actually live in housing projects would fail to see the humor here.

Somehow I think those who actually live in housing projects would fail to see the humor here.

Or those who actually live in modest, middle-income tract homes, for that matter... Maybe McCain should float a proposal that will allow everybody who earns less than 100k per year marry a millionaire.

user-pic

Standing on the patio of Gallagher's home, McCain...

... got splattered with watermelon when Gallagher did his famous sledgehammer stunt.  McSame grumbled about the watermelon and accused Gallagher of playing the Race Card before his disorientation subsided.

McSame grumbled about the watermelon and accused Gallagher of playing the Race Card before his disorientation subsided

McCain experienced orientation? How long did it last?

that is exactly the scenario i imagined when i read that too.

Maybe, maybe not. The economy might be bad enough in November that Obama wins regardless of almost anything said or done.

I do wish that Obama kept up the McCain = Bush 3rd term. I do not know why they dropped that line. It could fit right into whats happening now. "Rovian style attacks? McCain is just like Bush!" etc etc.

user-pic

Oh, I think they're coming. I really do.

I agree, they are coming. And I would guess that they're laying off that line of attack the last several weeks because they wanted the focus to be about Obama, not McCain. However, I think this week would have been the perfect time to bring it back since McCain hijacked the narrative this week.

The last "this week" is redundant. Pretend it didn't exist. If you figured that I didn't mean to put it in there, then this post is redundant so pretend it doesn't exist.

I would pay money for an edit function! Sell me one TPM!

i do think obama need to go somewhat negative. you can't bring knife to a shootout... mccain n camp do not respect obama so they will continue to go negative.. i wont be mad if obama go negative mccain decided long ago he doesn't want a positive campaign .............. i think this would be the best time to go negative right before the Olympics that way the last thing they remember is something negative about mccain before they tune out politics to watch all the games..............

user-pic

Well, I think he should have a hard charging confederate bring it, not he himself, at least not in the early rounds.

Have Hillary bring it. She's good in a street fight, and women have a decided advantage because if the man is too successful in his retaliation, he looks like a brute.

user-pic

Also, I'd like someone to ask McCain, in a town hall setting: "One candidate has never breeched the vows he's made to his first wife, the other candidate committed adultry to his first wife, while having an affair with the daughter of a multi-millionare, my question is who is more trust worthy?

Count down from ten, and watch McCain go ballistic.

The fact is, from this perspective, McCain isn't trustworthy and so he's vulnerable.

Obama doesn't need to bring this up. Someone else can.

user-pic

Wouldn't it be nice if people made their decisions on who to vote for intellectually?

Unfortunately people's decisions are based upon emotions - especially 'buy' decisions, which includes who to vote for. The Republicans know this. They always are selling an inferior product. They can never win on the merits, but they know they can manipulate emotions.

To a hard working, increasingly impoverished public, that has little time to research the candidates, the idea of waiting on future technology is vapor ware. Drilling sounds more tangible, especially since it is already taking place.

If Obama doesn't compromise here he gives the Republicans a modicum of traction. Keep in mind we are the party that wins the debates, has all the intellectually sound ideas, achieves all the moral victories (like nominating an African American) yet loses all the elections.

Frankly, I'm sick of that. At this point Obama can promise building a Nuclear Power plant in my back yard and promis using my basement for long term storage of the waste, and if it helps him get elected, he has my permission to so promise.

Wouldn't it be nice if people made their decisions on who to vote for intellectually?

What? And eliminate the Republicans completely?

Gotta love the irony of this. After making his "disappointment" in the race card being allegedly played by Obama, McCain's campaign "removes" th only black state reporter at McCain's event. Looks like black reporters aren't even allowed on the back of the bus with old McBush.

" Tallahassee Democrat senior writer Stephen Price on Friday was singled out and asked to leave a media area at the Panama City rally of presidential candidate Sen. John McCain."

http://floridacapitalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080802/CAPITOLNEWS/808020312

Non-issue and silly reports such as this one have the reporter trying to get themselves over. Yes, somebody is going to kick you out because you are black while surrounded by reporters during a Presidential campaign.

Read th article. Another reporter objected and was also removed.

If the press conference yesterday did not show the world how scripted McCain is I dont know what will. Question:"What do you think of Senator Obama's compromise to Oil drilling, he has said he is willing to support it..." McCain:"Senator Obama has been against Oil drilling, he is against nuclear energy, he has no plan to solve the energy crisis, blah, blah,blah"
This is brilliant. Take it off the table, republicans had all gone home with this issue, they thought they had something to throw over Americans eyes. Come October gas will be down to about $3 a gallon, and then the real issues like health care and social security and Unemployment will be the issue. This kills their momentum, it was the only issue they had.Its all McCain is talking about, now what?

user-pic

Well duh. That's all black people are allowed to say. Else they're oversensitive reverse-racists.

Generally, it seemed to be part of a regular Friday evening event, with little or no promotion.

The Florida Democratic Party, however, managed to get this small dig into the local paper:

"As Floridians are waking up to news that our state is in a recession for the first time in 16 years, John McCain proved how out of touch he is by wearing $520 Ferragamo shoes to his country concert" read the statement released by the Florida Democratic Party, only minutes after McCain stepped off stage Friday.

The above comments about media stupid-o's and the convention must be right:

Media Dumbass No. 1: The crowds are just overwhelming but the McCain camp is telling us this is just the worry they expressed: do we really need a celebrity in the White House? Media Dumbass No. 2?

Media Dumbass No. 2: Very interesting, Media Dumbass No. 1!! Have you been in touch with the McCain people about the outpouring of support we are seeing here right now?

Media Dumbass No. 1: That's right! And they do say they really are concerned, blah-blah-blah.

user-pic

MCCAIN IS FOLLOWING KARL ROVE’S STRAEGY……BOLDFACED LYING! AND HE'S TRYING TO DENY HE'S A RACIST DESPITE HIS RECORD TO THE CONTRARY

McCain defended opposition of federal MLK holiday by saying he supported Arizona’s state holiday. During a press availability in Panama City, Florida, John McCain said, “I have supported hundreds of pieces of legislation, which would help Americans obtain an equal opportunity in America. I am proud of that record, from fighting for the recognition of Dr. Martin Luther King’s birthday in my state to sponsoring specific legislation that would prevent discrimination in any shape or form in America today.”

FACT: McCain Supported Republican AZ Governor’s Decision To Rescind MLK Holiday. ABC News reported, “In Arizona, a bill to recognize a holiday honoring MLK failed in the legislature, so then-Gov. Bruce Babbitt, a Democrat, declared one through executive order. In January 1987, the first act of Arizona’s new governor, Republican Evan Mecham, was to rescind the executive order by his predecessor to create an MLK holiday. Arizona’s stance became a national controversy. McCain backed the decision at the time.”

FACT: McCain Supported Gov. Evan Mecham’s Decision In 1987 To Rescind Martin Luther King Jr. Day. As reported by the Philadelphia Inquirer, “In a vote likely to haunt him for the rest of his public career, McCain voted against 1983 legislation establishing the third Monday in January as the federal holiday marking King’s birthday. Back home in Arizona, he supported Gov. Evan Mecham’s decision in 1987 to rescind an executive order creating a state holiday for King, but later reversed his position.”

FACT: McCain Voted Against Creating Martin Luther King Holiday. In 1983, McCain voted against a motion to suspend the rules and pass a bill to designate the third Monday of every January as a federal holiday in honor of the late civil rights leader, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The motion passed 89-77.

FACT: In 1994, McCain Sided With Senator Jesse Helms and Voted To Eliminate Funding For Martin Luther King Commission. McCain voted in favor of a Helms amendment “to prohibit federal financing for the Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Holiday Commission.” The amendment failed 28-70-2.

FACT: McCain Voted Against The Civil Rights Act Of 1990 FOUR Times. In 1990, McCain voted against a bill designed to address employer discrimination at least 4 times. According to the Washington Post, the “Civil Rights Act of 1990 is designed to overturn several recent Supreme Court rulings that made it much more difficult for individual employees to prove discrimination. The legislation, being fought by business, also would impose new penalties on employers convicted of job discrimination.”

I think McCain's action depict exactly that ...
jealousy. Add obsession and desperation and that adquately explains just about everything!

user-pic

YES. You’re missing the point of what he is trying to do. Obama has never said that off-shore drilling would lower gasoline prices in the short-term, which is what McCain and his supporters are arguing and or implying to the Americans that are feeling the PAIN of high gas prices. Obama has opened the door to some limited “well-regulated” additional off-shore drilling in response to the PAIN of those voters rather than simply ignoring them by arguing that they are wrong. Rather than making a confrontational/polarizing effort to win the argument by more or less ignoring those voters who are in PAIN, Obama is deflating the issue itself by eliminating the PAIN points for consumers and environmentalists. He is offering a compromise position that addresses consumer gas price PAIN and the PAIN of environmentalists who favor that all off-shore drilling be “well-regulated”.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address