Election Central Morning Roundup
New Obama Ad: McCain Has "Been Washington's Biggest Celebrity"
The Obama campaign has a new national cable ad firing back at the McCain campaign's "celebrity line," pointing out that McCain has "been Washington's biggest celebrity" and has regularly appeared on shows like Jay Leno and Saturday Night Live. The ad is certainly entertaining, but it could also be a sign that the Obama camp sees McCain's efforts as effective and thus requiring a rebuttal:
McCain In Pennsylvania Today
John McCain is touring the swing state of Pennsylvania, seeking to maximize the benefit he can get from Barack Obama's vacation by having a must-win state for Dems to himself. McCain is scheduled to make a statement from Erie at 9 a.m. ET on the Georgia crisis, and will hold a town hall tomorrow in York.
McCain Meets With Tom Ridge
John McCain had dinner last night in Pennsylvania with Tom Ridge, the former two-term Pennsylvania governor and original secretary of homeland security. Expect quite a bit of VP speculation around Ridge as the two tour Pennsylvania over the next two days, but it still remains unlikely -- Ridge is pro-choice, a position that would alienate much of the GOP's base.
AFL-CIO Takes Up Obama Camp's Charge Against McCain On Ohio DHL Deal
The AFL-CIO has a new mailer in Ohio blasting John McCain and campaign manager Rick Davis for their role in the DHL deal, which the mailer says has now led to "8,000 Ohio Jobs Lost," an issue that the Obama campaign has vowed to hammer in this big swing state. The mailer then adds forcefully: "Don't Let McCain Get Away With It."
Obama Camp: VP Announcement Will Be Texted To Supporters
The Obama campaign is offering their supporters the chance to be the first to know who the vice-presidential candidate will be, with a Web page where supporters can sign up to receive the announcement by e-mail and/or text message. The big question: Will this list really be the first to know, or will somebody leak it to a media outlet first?
Dem Chances Improve For Open House Seat In New Jersey
CQ is changing its rating on New Jersey's Third Congressional District from "Leans Republican" to "No Clear Favorite," a sign of increasing Democratic chances for this open GOP-held seat. The district is currently occupied by retiring GOPer Jim Saxton, and Democratic nominee John Adler is mounting a very well-financed bid against Republican Chris Myers.
Third-Party Group Plans Pro-Obama Blitz -- But Can They Succeed?
Yet another third-party group is planning a major push for Barack Obama, with California-based PowerPAC announcing that they will launch a voter registration drive targeting black voters in the South and Hispanic voters in the West. The group intends to spend $10 million, but will face the same challenge as other third-party groups that want to help Obama: He has explicitly told his supporters not to fund such efforts.















Sorry, but I see this in much the same way as Ben Smith at Politico.
The Obama team as in the primary waited until it was universally established that McCain was gonna go negative and keep going negative. So if/when Obama responded, it would not be said that Obama was the first going negative. I bet that once the Obama campaign saw that McCain was gonna go negative during the Olympics that it was time to bring out the guns.
The bad thing for McCain is that because of the Olympics, most of the political show will be drowned out. So his "rebuttal" ad will not be getting as much play as before.
I think this ad is great, and probably signifies that the Obama campaign are getting ready to take the gloves off.
August 11, 2008 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ben Smith knows diddly.
I like the ad. I only wish they had been more specific and hit harder like this:
"McCain has done one thing well -- self promotion. Instead of working on legislation or boning up on the issues, he's been on "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" more than any other guest. He's been on the Sunday talk shows more than any other guest in the past 10 years. He's hosted "Saturday Night Live" and even announced his candidacy in 2007 on "The Late Show with David Letterman."
The campaign needs to follow this ad up with out and out saying McCain lacks leadership, while their may be questions about obama...McCain's track record demonstrates he can lead anybody:
"No leadership
McCain has frequently taken on near-impossible missions that go against the grain of his party. It's the basis of his reputation as a maverick. But McCain has never been able to bring more than a handful of Republicans along with him on issues such as campaign finance reform or immigration. Democrats on the Hill have accepted McCain's help on some issues, but except for a few exceptions (John Kerry and Joe Lieberman), they've never warmed to him.
To achieve anything as president, McCain would have to win over two hostile parties: The Democrats and the Republicans.
Living in the Sixties
McCain is still fighting the Vietnam War. But he's not fighting the real historic war, which taught us the folly of injecting ourselves into a civil war that was none of our business. We learned that, in a world where even peasants have guns, explosives and radios, a determined and popular guerrilla force can defeat a modern army equipped with the mightiest technology if that army has no vital national interest to protect.
Instead, McCain is fighting an imaginary Vietnam War, where a sure victory could have been achieved with just a little more bombing, just a little more "pacification," just a little more will to win at home. This fantasy clouds McCain's judgment on foreign policy.
Most of the other high-profile politicians who fought in Vietnam -- Colin Powell, Chuck Hegel, John Kerry, and Jim Webb -- aren't stuck in the past, and they don't view the Iraq War as a chance to get Vietnam right. "
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid={4914192B-12AF-4623-AB18-5EFE91204B04}&print=true&dist=printMidSection
Obama should put together an ad with Hagel, Kerry, Webb, and Powell, where they all oppose the war.
Ben Smith has no appreciation for how most football games are won in the 3rd quarter. Not the first half. the first half you get to size up your opponent and see their tactics and figure out how to beat them.
So tell Ben Smith to sit down and be quiet and watch a real quarterback play. Obama is Montana. The Clintons were the Colts who finished the year with the best record but failed to make the playoffs in 1967 and then Montana owned the Colts in the SuperBowl.
Montana was not even thought to have a chance just like Obama and especially not against the Colts?Clintons.
Now that Obama has clearly established how McCain is going to hit him, he can start firing hard, fast and furious.
It is time to go CHI-Town, Daley down dirty bad and wipe up the floor with McCain.
Go Obama! Shock the world. Fill up Invesco and take back the White House.
Democrats RULE!!!
August 11, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fiery words... but you got the wrong Joe. You mean Namath (owned the Colts in Superbowl III), not Montana (played a decade later!)
Anyway, I'd rather Obama is like Montana (consistent champ) than Namath... :-)
August 11, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Namath looked better in pantyhose (or so I'm told).
August 11, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is that Diddly, the grand patriarch of the Squat family?
If so, I must disagree. Ben Smith don't know Diddly.
August 11, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I saw it this morning on the Today Show already. I was like, "yes!!!!!!!"
General comments from the Pile:
1. Allusions that the Obama camp sees the "celebrity" ad as "effective" is reading too much into it, IMO. I'd chalk the response up to fighting the existing undercurrent of stupidity for which we chiefly have Karl Rove to thank.
2. The Olympics are not quite the distraction that the World Series is. The Cubs are going to win the National League pennant, and then you'll see distraction. Just you see.
August 11, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am glad to hear it is airing. What state did you see it in?
August 11, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does this stupid guy have an ounce of originality? Someone calls you a celebrity. You call him back as celebrity? While Obama is mimicking McCain, McCain is moving on to the next target of this guy. Wait for Obama's Edwards story to come out. Oh, never mind. this guy is impotent, remember?
August 11, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thea ad calls McCain a celebrity but it attacks him for having lobyist run his campaign, for hugging W, and for giving tax breaks to the rich whle shafting the workers. What part of that did you miss?
August 11, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good ad. I especially like the music - contra McCain's ad, which is meant to sound menacing, this ad kinda comes off as less negative thanks to the zippy and ear-catching music. Well done.
As for PowerPAC launching a voter registration drive, I don't think this is the type of activity Obama was trying to shut down. Wasn't his objection more to swiftboat type groups and ad campaigns? Doubt his campaign would have any objection to outside groups registering likely Dem voters.
August 11, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are plenty of CURRENT outside groups registering tens of thousands of Democratic voters. It has nothing to do with the Obama campaign.
And you're right - it was swiftboat type groups he was talking about.
August 11, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I definitely agree about the brilliance of the music. It makes the ad fun, and takes some of the "negative ad" curse off of it without in any wise diminishing the power of the criticism. I also love the way that they worked in the Bush hug scene again and again. A well cut ad.
August 11, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good response, without the nastiness.
The Obama camp is walking a fine line, but they're doing it flawlessly.
This ad is proof to those who wanted a harder response that they can do it in their own terms.
August 11, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
This ad is proof to those who wanted a harder response that they can do it in their own terms.
This ad is proof to those who wanted a harder response that the Obama campaign finally got it that it's About Fucking Time.
Nothing more, nothing less.
August 12, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
gharlane, when did you become a Democrat?
August 14, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re-registered from Green to Dem in Jan 2008.
Voted Obama in the CA Primary, incidentally.
Party history:
1980-1992: Dem
1992-Jan 2008: Green
Jan 2008-present: Dem
Why do you ask?
August 18, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like the ad but I think if Obama was going to go there he should have a week or two ago. At this point the ad sort of comes off as, "Nuh uh! You are!"
August 11, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
True, it's giving McCain the raspberry instead of the finger.
August 11, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Weird. A negative ad that's fun. I kind of like it--it's not exactly hard hitting, but it does make a point.
August 11, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently the Obama ad people can't tell the difference between McCain's right and his left.
August 11, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Neither can McCain, so what's the difference?
August 11, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Stage right, stage left.
August 11, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I liked that the ad had multiple shots of McCain embracing Bush. The Obama camp needs to hammer that point home again and again and again; i.e., McSame = Bush.
August 11, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Those were the money shots.
Keep featuring them. Over. And over. And over.
And about f**ing time, too.
August 12, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone seen Politico this morning? Someone please tell Bob Kerrey to shut his trap, seriously:
http://strategy08.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/bob-kerrey-needs-to-stfu/
August 11, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Democrats are their own nemesis. They like to run their mouth at the detriment of the party. I am glad Obama doesn't have his headquarter in DC area.
August 11, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who's Bob Kerrey?
August 11, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bob Kerrey is a certified war criminal/medal-of-honor winner in 'Nam. Former (Dim) Nebraska Senator, now president of the New School, though why I shall never understand....
August 11, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was throwing a little Monday snark. Bob Kerrey is a nobody now. Only the Villagers care about him, and even then he's pretty C list. I'm not worried with what he says.
August 11, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The good news is that nobody listens to Bob Kerrey.
August 11, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Until the MSM gives him a platform. They're looking for anybody who can undermine the message.
August 11, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good Ad!! But what took them so long? They should have release this Ad a week ago. Like i said last week, McCain's Ad has been running endlessly in New Hampshire.
I am pretty sure the underlining dynamics of the poll hasn't changed that much but Obama has remained static in the poll.
August 11, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Love the ad. That's just the right tone, not nasty, simply dismissive of McSame as the lightweight hack that he is.
August 11, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Snapy music that sounds OLD. Good Call.
August 11, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Doc Severinsen would've loved it.
...wait, I think he's still alive
August 11, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the ad. I think it is straight forward and effective without losing the whimsy of how silly this whole "celebrity" thing is. But I also think we focus too much on the ad wars sometimes. I'm much more concerned about the McCain speech on Georgia. This is a golden opportunity for a major foreign policy coup while Obama is getting some R&R. I can see it now.
"My friends, this aggression by Russia against Georgia must be met with a full and robust International response. As we speak, Russian tanks are rolling into Atlanta, Decatur, Athens, and Savannah in flagrant violation of the will of the International community. When will it end? When will Putin and Medvedev decide they've had enough? When they've taken over all of Georgia? When they've marched down the highway into Gainesville and been soundly beaten and turned away like the UGA football team? When will it end, my friends?"
August 11, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
hahahahaha, that doddering ol McCain is just dimwitted enough to say just that...lol lol. athens, decatur and atlanta...ctfu!! he did mix up sunni and shia so no telling what will come out his mouth..he might even demnand the BullDogs get on the field!!
August 11, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
? You sure about that? Their campaign has never had a problem with 3rd party funded GOTV efforts. They only take issue with outside groups trying to speak for him or pushing a message on the public for Obama's benefit.
Hell I bet they are welcoming of anybody who wants to register new voters and bring them into the political process, it's what they've been about all along.
August 11, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep Obama doesn't want those groups who are part of the clinton power players running a message he doesn't want and trying to shape his image in a way that does not speak for him. Kerry got backstabbed like that in '04. Which is why Obama moved the DNC to Chicago.
August 11, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Shocking...how is the part Ben Smith quoted from the article so much better than what you chose? It even echoes my thoughts.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12431.html
August 11, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not impressed by the ad. It's both too little and too late, and comes off as overly reactive. If they were going to go there, they should GO there -- throw in the mansions and the shoes and the most appearances on both the Daily Show and MTP, etc. I get the feeling the campaign wanted to make this ad really hard-hitting but pulled back. To me, it feels caught in the middle, which is never a good place to be.
August 11, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know that this is an admission that the celebrity line of attack is working. The irony of DC's biggest preener attacking Obama as a celebrity was not picked up by anyone outside of the incestuous liberal blogosphere. The village always needs a push.
August 11, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
While Barack is the international rock star type celebrity, McCain is the cheesy game show type celebrity.
Let's keep seeing McCain hugging George W.
More, please.
August 11, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have a feeling that this is just the beginning for the Obama campaign.
In time the Obama campaign's ads are going to get more and more aggressive with McCain as the "Washington celebrity". They will bring out his lobbyists ties, his 95% voting with Bush, his flip flopping, his striving to be Bush's third term, etc.
I knew something was up when Richardson called McCain the "Washington celebrity".
August 11, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain has called himself a fucking "political celebrity" for christ's sake.
August 11, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lets get some video of that for the next ad!
August 11, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
It has been white washed from his web site.
August 11, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody has it. Let the search begin!
August 11, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The McSame "Celebrity" ad must have run 100 times over the weekend.
The McSame campaign is only interested in giving every (white) Murkin a (specious, spurious, but 'plausible') reason NOT to vote for Obama.
I think it'll probably work, frankly, sadly...
August 11, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
At some point we have to see the 8 houses and $500 shoes. I can't wait for that.
August 11, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was frustrated at the time it took for Obama to hit back at McCain, but I think now that Obama was just giving McCain time to dig himself in. Not only did McCain get deep into negative attacks that were stupid (tires!), false (troops and cameras!), and at least arguably racist (white girls!) -- but the press actually pushed back a little on all three points. (So not only did it erode McCain's base a little, but it will also limit McCain's freedom to make underhanded attacks in the future.) Then Obama started hitting back, and his hits have been hard, fair, and light-hearted. Time will tell, but I think Obama has played this just about perfectly.
August 11, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the ad and agree with the poster who said the music sounded "old", that was brilliant. The only time I hear music like that nowadays is in movies that reflect a past era, or on the oldies station. And I was pleased that the "hug" was added, you know that famous photo of Bush and McSame. I hope the Obama campaign continues to use that photo at every opportunity because no words even have to be spoken, the visual alone speaks volumes.
August 11, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know who loves this ad the most? Rove, Schmidt and Davis. Because they've knocked Obama off his pedestal of "new politics".
Of course if Obama had good surrogates he could easily explain that McCain made three ads trying to label him, including a $6M Olympic ad buy, and it was time to hit back. He just needs to make sure to push that defense when he is attacked by the right for "same old politics". He just has to make crystal clear that he can frame it as counter-punching after numerous gutter attacks. How he's been talking about policies and ideas whereas McCain has been smearing and slandering him and he's not going to stand by and let it happen.
August 11, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are tons of comments on this thread saying "timing off -- released it too late."
Which is silly. They waited precisely so that it would be clear they were "just responding, because the other guy went negative first." Insulating them against the sort of criticism you're anticipating. (As for surrogates: Paris was our best surrogate. After she released her video, anyone who owned a television had to have heard about McCain's attack.)
But this is not in fact a response to McCain, in spite of the "celebrity" hook. You don't really "rebut" a claim of that sort. It doesn't work. This is our *own* negative characterization of McCain as a "Washington insider, close to Bush," just coupled with the word "celebrity" so that it looks like a "fair reply to a previous attack."
In short, this is just about perfect. I hope they actually put some $$$ into it.
August 11, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
August 11, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Same here (for whatever little my opinion is worth).
August 11, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought the ad was a great but late response to the Paris/Britney ad. It does show that team O has a sense of humor without being heavy handed. The comic timing was right.
For future ads, just play parts of the Dazed and Confused collection from TPM. Distilled down to 30 second bites. There's enough in that collection to go 'til November but McC is bound to gaffe again. It's all we need to see of how clueless McCain really is. How about a McCain temper tantrum collection? There are probably more textual anecdotes than actual footage of the famous McCain rage.
Obama could say something about McCain's recent experiences with the internet. "My opponent says he's learning how to use the internet, so I'll give him a couple more weeks to get up to speed on that."
August 11, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
How easy was that? In 30 seconds the Obama camp effectively responded to Buffalos Chip McSurge's "celebrity" BS. I hope this ad is running all over and repeatedly. Let's see more like this.
Next one I'd like to see: Iraq War - Bush * McCain - lies - forged documents - Bush + McCain - over 400 dead - "more wars" - "100 years" - Bush + McCain.
August 11, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the ad but the theme that Barack needs to paint McCain with the the Washington insider who entrenched in the old Washington ways. This is a change election year you don't get change by electing the carer politician.
That theme not only fits with Barack's message but turns McCain's biggest strength, his experience, into his biggest liability.
August 11, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
you know what guys this is whole too late meme is getting tiresome. if Obama had responded orginally then for the past what 2 weeks, all we would have gotten is back to back attack ads, and lets be honest. What makes Obama a "risky" choice to some people is that people claim to not know enough about Obama. Obama unlike Cliton and McCain is a relatively unknown quanitity to some people. If he had spent the past 2 weeks countering attack ads, what would the people who consider his unknown have discoverd about Obama. The answer NOTHING! Unlike McCain or Clinton Obama does not have the luxury to just run a counterattack campaign. He has to let those American who are looking for a reason to vote for him than the fact that yes we like him, and the way to do that is not by running a negative non-substantive campaign, one in which all Obama does is counterpunch negative ads all the time. While McCain has been running negative ads, what has Obama been doing, talking about the economy, energy, jobs, etc. He's been giving those voters who wants other reasons to vote for him, exactly what may sway them...policy.
I really think that we sometimes forget that Obama and McCain are trying to reach different audiences. McCain wants to reach the people who are looking for reasons NOT TO VOTE FOR BARACK H OBAMA. Barack wants to reach the people who are looking for reasons to VOTER FOR BARACK OBAMA, or even AGAINST GWB.
I really think that should be the eyes by which we view this campaign. Because conservative will ultimately vote against Obama by voting for McCain (or hopefuly Barr), and Liberals will untimately vote for Obama or against Bush. So I think it's really about who can get out the most of the middle of the road voters.
Obama will not win the people who aren't even contemplating voting for him, but he has a good chance of winning those who are.
August 11, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
You hit right on target.
August 11, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
The ad is certainly entertaining, but it could also be a sign that the Obama camp sees McCain's efforts as effective and thus requiring a rebuttal:
Oh please. Another example of the THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS! FOR MCCAIN!!! type thinking.
It is illogical to assume that the Obama must have seen the McCain/Britney ad as effective for them to run this. Please, Eric, think it through a little more before adding some off-the-cuff information-free analysis.
August 11, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain as the "Washington celebrity" really means "Washington insider" which is what's bad about Washington right now which is Bush's third term, run by lobbyists, corruption, no change, wrong direction, etc.
By using "celebrity" tag the media will more likely play this over and over again eventhough this isn't really about McCain being a "celebrity" per se. Then the Obama surrogates can go around and talk about how McCain isn't a "maverick", etc.
Also, by using "the View", "The Tonight Show", etc, there is a chance that these shows will show the ad and talk about it. Except for Elizabeth, the gals at "the View" are NOT fans of McCain and will talk about it as well.
In terms of being "late", better late than never which is what happened with Kerry.
Again these "Washington celebrity" ads will get harder as time goes on.
August 11, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, it's about time the Obama campaign got this ad out there. They should have been responding with humor, derision and mocking for some time now.
Instead, we've seen responses like Kerry's to the Swift Boat ads. Near silence.
Next, let's hit back on the "elitist" charge. 9 homes, $500 shoes, out of touch with working people. Did I mention $500 shoes?
August 11, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I said over at DKOS, it fits here too. Just change DKOS to TPM:
The purpose of the Obama campaign isn't to play puppet to all the wrongs that have been done to Democrats. Obama is not our personal avenger. He has to win all Americans. He can't just make his whole campaign about avenging Democrats hurt feeling from the past 2 elections.
I really think that many of us are pushing our revenge fantasy onto the Obama campaign. I'm sorry, if the Obama campaign becomes all about "Repub done us wrong, so let's cut off their balls" we will lose...period.
This is not an issue of policy here. So yes I think we should be holding Obama's feet to the fire about his policy decisions (FISA, drilling, or whatever), but if you truly voted for Obama, and not just against Clinton or anyone else, then trust the man to at least run his campaign message the way that see fit. They have internal polling, we do not. We are just running on emotions which is fine, but not if you're running a campaign (for an example of letting emotions rule your campaign see Clinton, H)
If Obama runs the dkos campaign, we would be satisfied, but the the 50% of the country would not, and we would lose.
Let Obama control his message and strategy and we should continue to volunteer, donate, and on Nov 4 GOTV. I don't know about ya'll, but I want to win.
>
August 11, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
According to the HuffPo they next McCain attack is going to be directed at Obama's education. His private schooling in Hawaii, Columbia and Harvard magna cum laude etc.
As ridiculous as this sounds, expect it to resonate with the GOP base. Bush brags about being a C-student and McCain relishes the fact he finished 5th from the bottom of his class. I guess it makes the base feel better about themselves.
August 11, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Which is also why the "celebrity" ads work. They get the C students jealous of Obama, while thinking that Bush and McCain are "one of us." Never mind that the C students could never have made it like Bush and McC without Bush and McC's respective connections and the ability of their well-placed families to place them in the right spots and cover up for their fiascos. Unless someone (like, um, Obama) tells them that, it won't hit their radar screens.
McCain would never have made it to where he was in the military without his admiral daddy. Both Bush and McCain are children of privilege, and they've worked very hard -- and successfully -- to keep that fact out of voters' consciousness. And part of what they do is take someone who actually did work his way up (Obama) and make him appear to be a person of privilege.
Now we can sneer all we want at it and say that "it makes the base feel better about themselves." But it does. It's worked now for several elections. And if Obama doesn't undermine it successfully in this election, it could well work again.
August 12, 2008 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Washington's Biggest Celebrity
THAT's the Chicago Way
August 11, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Perfect ad. Those who would say otherwise are probably on the payroll of one of those outfits that pay people to muddy up the comments.
Good job. Ballsiness is next to Godliness with most voters these days. Obama just showed that he isn't gonna let them piss on his leg while trying to convince him it's raining.
Enjoy.
August 11, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Perfect ad. Those who would say otherwise are probably on the payroll of one of those outfits that pay people to muddy up the comments.
Must you insist on impugning the motives of everyone who disagrees with you, or with some move the Obama campaign makes?
Sheesh. People who talk like this are flat out of real arguments.
August 12, 2008 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
The ad is certainly entertaining, but it could also be a sign that the Obama camp sees McCain's efforts as effective and thus requiring a rebuttal
OR Eric it could be that it was timed to give McCain enough rope to hang himself.
Had to give McCain's Olympics ad time to set the stage or it wouldn't have meant anything
August 11, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
A reader on HuffPost (PhDiva) points this opinion on this Obama ad. I agree with it, so I post it to share it with you:
1. Obama cannot win the celebrity debate. He's just too popular. What he can do is neutralize it. That's what this ad does. It basically says: "Fine, were both celebrities. It's a draw." If they are both celebrities, the effect of the argument is neutralized.
2. It makes McCain look like a hypocrite.
3. It compares to forms of popularity. Obama is basically saying: "McCain is popular with Washington, Obama is popular with you!"
4. It shows that Obama is willing to fight back. If voters see him accepting McCain's attacks passively, we will be discouraged. He needs to show that he is a fighter, that he is more willing to stand his ground than Gore and Kerry were. The voter morale value is great.
5. I also think the ad is deliberately a little cheesy. Obama is trying to show that he's not slick. This ad is about showing that McCain is slick.
August 11, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
If it really has to be fought this way, then fine, I'll swallow the bile that's currently in my mouth, but I'm not happy about it.
August 11, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
New DNC ad attacking McCain on Jobs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYLZ9NUMRNA
The script:
TEXT: Times Are Tough For Americans... American Jobs Are Threatened... John McCain And The Lobbyists Who Run His Campaign Have Helped Send American Jobs Overseas... 8,000 DHL Jobs In Ohio Are Threatened Because Of McCain and His Campaign Manager
GRAPHIC: Cleveland Plain Dealer Headline: McCain had role in original Wilmington DHL deal, August 5, 2008
QUESTION: "My question is, how do you intend to keep American businesses in America and to make America more self sufficient?"
MCCAIN: "I'm not going to keep them all in America." [CNN Live Feed (New Orleans, LA), 4/24/2008]
TEXT: 14,000 American Jobs Are At Stake Because of John McCain and His Lobbyist Advisors
MCCAIN: "I'm not going to keep them all in America." [CNN Live Feed (New Orleans, LA), 4/24/2008]
TEXT: John McCain The Wrong Choice On Jobs
August 11, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
As per Michael Feldman on "What Do You Know" (WiscPublicRadio and NPR saturdays)
John McCain got the reports back that the spot on his face was benign....
it's just the rest of him that is malignant.
August 11, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh. McTumor...
August 11, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The ad works because McCain is smiling and laughing. It appears that he's smilling and laughing at you--the American taxpayer.
August 11, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why are these ads not released on Youtube? I like seeing how many views they get.
August 11, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPZyXvEw6M
August 11, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Audio from the spot has gone up here
August 11, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish they could have used his cameos in movies and other non-talk show venues to really drive the point home. That he goes on talk-shows is not the best way to nail McShame, B H O has done that as well. The sheer volume of McShame's Schmoozing and his entree into Hollywood (Wedding Crashers, etc) should be front and center.
Oh, and the fact that he cheated on his wife with multiple women, the wife who raised his kids and endured his captivity and when she had a disfiguring accident he ditched her. Also his kid just slunk away from managing a bank that is being seized by the Feds.
August 11, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like your avatar. Where I can find it?
August 11, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
beatbushgear.com
I scraped it off their website.
August 11, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Celebrity was just a code word. They used it so their "Washington Insider" attack would look like a counterpunch/rebuttal to the Celebrity ads McCain has been launching at Obama.
August 11, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
This spot took the teeth out of the McCain celebrity line of attack while simultaneously punching McCain in both kidneys and drawing a line for the incision on his Achille's heel - the fake smile and the creepy head-bob laugh that's gonna lose the l'ection for him - and you thought I was going to say "lobbyists".
Strategy-wise it could not have been dumber for the McCain campaign to release the hypocritical celebrity ad because it left him wide open and Obama gets a pass on going negative because it is a response ad. The schmaltzy music, the TV appearances and the multiple Bush embraces are direct VISUAL PROOF, whereas Paris, Britney and crowd of 200,000 germans is an analogy that requires a leap of faith. Since this latest commercial is so much easier to believe it makes the McCain commercial seem like a lie when compared side to side. This is going to be very effective. I don't think McCain's strategists expected the Obama campaign to hit back like this - the truth hurts.
August 11, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly what's wrong with the ad. It starts to take on the celebrity issue, then switches to taxes, then gets into the "same old, same old" meme. It's not a very focused ad.
August 11, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do not think this is a particularly smart ad.
Who among the McSame base--and most of Mid-Dull Murka, for that matter--wouldn't want the same sort of celebrity McSame enjoys? Leno? Letterman? Stewart? The lumper-proles would KILL for that kind of recognition. It's "personal" celebrity. Obama's 'celebrity' is not personal; it's charismatic, but undifferentiated.
August 11, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed: not a good add.
The McCain attacks are shifting slightly, they're not attacking Obama directly. While they're casting doubt on Obama as a legitimate candidate by portraying him as just a passing fad, they're now doing that by attacking Obama supporters (see the latest McCain add). By making Obama supporters appear to be a bunch of brainless, shallow, hero-worshiping groupies, the implicit unasked question is: "you're not that stupid, are you?"
So, Obama will need to do a number of things:
• Make commercials with adds featuring down-to-earth, smart Obama supporters - people who viewers can identify with - talking about why they support Obama.
• Don't follow the Rove/MCain team into the celebrity battle; it isn't about celebrity, it's about exploiting an identified weakness in people's perceptions of OBAMA, and the 'celebrity' meme is simply a tool. That same tool will not work on McCain, because he doesn't have the same perceived weaknesses as Obama. 'Celebrity' is the Phillip's-head screwdriver that fits Obama. Obama's team needs to find the tool that works on McCain, be it a flat-head screwdriver, a hammer - whatever it is.
• Stay on message. Continue to make Obama appear presidential. Counter the McCain adds by DEMONSTRATING the kind of presidential gravitas people expect, and by showing that Obama knows his stuff, that he's ready to lead.
• Stick with the change theme - but clarify and deepen it. Identify, specifically, how an Obama administration will be different than Bush's, and then contrast that by highlighting the areas where MCain is the same as Bush.
• Keep the HOPE alive. Focus in the issues that people care about. Keep inspiring people. Be positive, not negative. Lead.
August 11, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not good spelling on my part either.
Ad.
August 11, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should say some of these things himself:
• John McCain can attack me all he wants. But that doesn't bother me because my campaign isn't about me - and it isn't about John McCain - it's about YOU. My voice is nothing without yours. I am merely the loud-speaker for your hopes and dreams for our nation.
• People are not excited by me, Obama, the person. They're excited because they have hope. And hope for one's future, for the American Dream, and for our country is worth getting excited about.
• If John McCain wants to belittle your enthusiasm by comparing crowds of concerned and committed citizens such as yourselves, to a flock of signature-seeking groupies, then shame on him. He knows better. This isn't about red-carpets and paparazzi, this is about our nation's future - about your future.
• John McCain wants to change the subject, because straight talk isn't his friend any more. John McCain 'can't handle the truth', and the truth is, there are only two choices facing the American public this November: more of the same, or change.
• No matter how low John McCain and his handlers want to take this campaign, I will not go there. I will continue to champion the issues that matter to you, and to address the difficult challenges our nation faces. That's both change you can believe in, and the straight-talk you deserve.
Hammer those points home, Obama.
August 11, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink