« New York Times Hits Bayh For Membership In Committee For Liberation Of Iraq | Home | Wolfson: Hillary's Senior Advisers All Rejected Penn's Push For Xenophobic Campaign »
Counting The White Women In McCain's "Hot Chicks" Ad
Jake Tapper of ABC News counts up the young white women in McCain's new "hot chicks dig Obama" ad.
The grand total: Four young white women.
Discuss.
Advertisement















I think we all know that this ad was meant to scare racist older folks into thinking their white daughter lusts for Obama's flesh (or vice versa).
But the problem is this: It does us NO GOOD to call the GOP out on this. That's what they want. We can call them on immaturity, but playing the race card in a general election almost NEVER works. It was a great strategy in the primary against cynical Billary, but it's not the right one here.
August 12, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not "the race card" to point out explicit appeals to racial bigotry and intolerance. It is also not "the race card" to point out when someone is generalizing based solely off racial perceptions. The problem is, Republicans have no shame, and Independents are Independents because they don't necessarily share the values of either party.
So it's best to allow a pattern to emerge, or wait for them to cross the line even further than they have. Otherwise, the back and forth is only beneficial to McCain.
August 12, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
At the convention, Obama is going to need to deal with this whole thing by saying, "Look, race has never been properly addressed in this country, and that's why there's all this tension on even bringing it up. So let's get it out there and get over it."
With a tack like that, he can turn a queasy negative into a semi-positive. In short, he needs to make racists feel good about themselves. And I'll bet he can do it.
August 12, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought that's what he said in Philadelphia.
August 12, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is what he said, and it's all that he should say.
The MSM and the McCain campaign have been goading him for weeks now to "make race an issue" in this campaign, and, much to the credit of his intelligence, Obama has resisted. Keep up the good work.
August 12, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Guess they should stick to the "See what we mean line" when McLame keeps thumping this tub.
Apparently, Big Bad John thinks the "bitter" thing is news. By his paleolithic timeline, maybe it is.
August 12, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
Hey Greg: SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP. Do NOT use this to call McCain a racist, or assist in this issue being raised by clueless liberals rising to the bait. If you can't respond constructively, please just shut the fuck up.
August 12, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well put. They're baiting us. The proper thing to do is ignore it.
August 12, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would respectfully submit that this ad is not primarily a racist attack. Instead, I think it is designed for the over-65 crowd in an effort to reinforce the conclusions this age group has drawn about younger folks.
"Groupies" congregating around folk in a "fad like" manner. The chanting of "Obama" came across as empty and a bit mindless--shades of controlling mobs by a charismatic leader (Nazi Germany, anyone?).
This plays on the fears of the over-65 crowd and the Obama folk would be well served by addressing those concerns. Look, this ad makes it seem like Obama is just as empty as the latest sports hero found to take mountains of steroids or the latest music celebrity drugged out of his/her mind. And even with these abysmal lifestyles, young people support them mindlessly. I am exaggerating here to make my point.
Obama needs to respond with older, settled and calmer people supporting him as well as younger, energetic and not idiotic younger people. This would help address and soothe the older crowd.
I simply don't see the main thrust of this ad as racist. McCain understands the over-65 crowd because, gasp, he's one of them and knows their mind-set quite well.
August 12, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I understand what he's doing on that front. But...the problem I see is that older people also tend to be traditionally influenced by the younger generation's hope and excitement. Obama can make a REALLY easy pitch to these folks that he's turned apathy into action and made a civic contribution by engaging these young people. I think that's a strong case.
August 12, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I agree with that. But I also think it has to have a rational basis--and that's certainly NOT what comes across in this ad. What comes across is that Obama supporters are groupes--or members of a cult. Isn't that a familiar charge?
Do I agree? Hell, no. But we have to respond to the actual charge and not a secondary or illusionary one.
August 12, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Effective ads work on multiple levels. I don't see why this ad can't be both an appeal to older demographics AND a classically racist dogwhistle.
August 12, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still think the elephant in the room is just how immature and "groupie-like" the Obama supporters are. I think McCain is dangling a possible racism link out there so we can bite down on it. Any racist charges would further allow the over 65 crowd to believe that Obama supporters are just plain nuts.
Obama supporters are not as portrayed in this ad. That's what we all should be shouting from the rooftops--well, perhaps in a more congenial way since we don't want to enforce the "cultist" theme.
August 12, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
**Are you saying we *don't* lust for him? Hey! Wake up! The dude is HOT!
August 12, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ohmigod. That's five!!!
Now I really am beginning to get worried.
August 12, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
[blockquote]Discuss.[/blockquote]
Someone is bound and determined to keep race front and center as an election issue?
And there are people in the press that consistently show that they are more than happy to eat that up.
August 12, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
dammit, epic html fail. o_O
August 12, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
No worry. We knew what you meant.
How do I love thee?
Let me count the ways...
August 12, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we should leave this alone. Its getting boring now
Devastating McCain Video
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/devastating-mccain-video/
August 12, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know, McCain put people in an ad who were members of a race, and the PC Police freaked out. Clearly, McCain should have used raceless women in his commercials. Or perhaps robots.
This whole idea that you can't show a white women liking a black candidate is itself kind of racist, it implicitly makes the argument against inter racial relationships, and it's a retrograde attitude along with the rest.
Will it resonate with some people? I suppose, but the PC-police style over reaction is probably turning off more people then the original ads.
For gods sake, it's not like the real racists out there are going to forget that he's black.
August 12, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's aimed at the "I'm not a racist but it's natural for people to stick to their own kind" crowd, i.e., racists.
August 12, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, McCain should have put BLACK women in the ad, since we support him more than White women do at 90% compared to around 63% for them .
August 12, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg: How about calling out Howard Wolfson for his stupid comment:
"Edwards voters' second choice"
Total bullocks. I was for Edwards and switched over to Obama. And in all fairness, this was only due to Edwards having the best proposal for health care of the three top candidates.
August 12, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am sure you all know this, but Wolfson was basically saying if Edwards had come clean and not run or dropped out early, HRC would have won the nomination with him out of the running. This is just not true. I am damn sick and tired of the HRC backers not getting on board for Obama, BTW. I mean the big time donators. What do they want, to continue to destroy our nation for four more years so they can have Hillary run again sooner? Real love of country there.
August 12, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amelie, you covered it pretty well in your comments.
I'd vote for Greg not to cover it on the site - there's been enough Clinton psychodrama covered here and elsewhere to last a lifetime.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 12, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton overkill, that is so true.
August 12, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd vote for Greg and Eric to make their editorial decisions based on what they see as newsworthy and/or of interest to the readers here.
Re: Wolfson. What a whiner. All those what-if's.
I mean, what if Edwards had never had the affair in the first place? What if Hillary weren't so paralyzed about making campaign decisions? What if Big Dog hadn't been such a Bill in a China Shop? What if they hadn't pissed away all that money pre-Iowa? What if...
August 12, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
What if they had never hired Mark Penn
August 12, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The ultimate response to Wolfson is the Pollster.com trend line from the primary campaign. Hillary was at about 45% last fall, when there were seven other candidates in the race. As everybody except Obama dropped out, she never rose above that 45% ceiling.
http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-dem-pres-primary.php
August 12, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey! It's their country, isn't it? :)
August 12, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wolfson will do or say anything to explain why he and the rest of the well-paid, well-heeled sages on Team Clinton architected such an epic fail of a campaign.
August 12, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
i think this is a more nuanced attack than we're willing to give credit to.
i think that sen. clinton's campaign tried to downplay sen. obama's draw by first attacking his speeches as something that won't bring change, and also by saying that by only hoping things will change that it will come down from the sky. mccain is taking this to the next level by saying, "he's a professional speech-giver who has become so popular, that he draws young white women to stadiums where he would raise their taxes and have sex with them"
seems like their attack line to me
August 12, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let the press push this issue (it there is one). Obama needs to completely distance himself from any race issue.
I think Tapper's eyes were opened by Gergen a couple of weeks ago on one of the Sunday talkies.
Four doesn't seem like a lot, however compare it to the amount of black women, Hispanic women, old women, men etc and then it could become an issue.
August 12, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Leave it to good old Jake Tapper to try to push the racist theme he poo pooed last time.
Hey, Jake, the ad is an insult to young people supporting Obama. It is intended to tell grandparents that the kids today hoping for a better future are nuts. Any residual racism is secondary.
August 12, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bingo! Totally agree.
August 12, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tapper is simply trying to stir the pot for McCain. He is a hack.
August 12, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we give him too much credit to assign him partisan motives.
He really is just a hack.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 12, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Hanlon's razor.
August 12, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
And TPM is ignoring how many times Tapper and ABC have been playing the race card.
August 12, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Discuss? How 'bout we not. Any discussion about race-baiting will only backfire on Obama's campaign (since the worst thing in America isn't to be the victim of racism, but rather to be accused--however rightly--of being a racist).
August 12, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I see what everyone is saying about the white women, and Lord knows, I think this is a stupid ad. But consider the response if the ad were filled with young African-American women (or men). Many of us would be outraged as well. And if McCain had included a group of multicultural kids (my own experience is that Obama is very popular among Asian and Indian voters), we'd have found something to complain about then.
In the past I've thought these ads were aimed at consolidating McCain's support among seniors and law-and-order types. But I wonder if they are hoping to skim off part of the youth vote -- not that youths will go to McCain, but perhaps they'll stop working so hard for Obama -- or perhaps not show up to vote.
Either way, I don't see these ads as doing a lot of voter damage, but at the same time, I'm reluctant to get too worked up about four white women in a video.
August 12, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
What about sexism? For the love of GOOD can we call them sexist?
Can someone please get Kathleen Sebelius, or better yet HILLARY CLINTON on the talkshows???
August 12, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's a good point. Here's an opportunity for the people at Emily's List to make some inroads with the Obama campaign.
August 12, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Remind me of why they would want to do that.
August 12, 2008 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Frankly, I think it is kudos for Obama to have all these people thinking he is 'all that'.
August 12, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's SIX! Jeez, Barack. Cool it off a bit, okay?
August 12, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why, some of my best friends ... But would you want your sister to date one?
August 12, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama can't call race every time he is criticized. I think he is hurt whenever it becomes an a talking point.
This is the empty suit argument. Obama is attacking Mccain for being a "Washington Insider", McCain is attacking his inexperience and the excitement surrounding his campaign.
August 12, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Someone should ask Jake Tapper why he's playing the race card. From the bottom of the deck, no less.
August 12, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe if we all ignored Tapper, he'd go away? Anything coming from him is pure and baseless drivel. I'm with those who say, 'let's not discuss this and move on'. He's clearly baiting.
It would be one thing if the guy could write coherently and with a purpose, but the guy's main function is to spew crap and further devolve the profession of 'journalism'.
August 12, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign better not respond to this.
August 12, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
They won't. Tapper isn't stirring the pot to get Obama to respond. It's to get Obama supporters publicly outraged, and get the ball roll from there.
August 12, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
here we go again. we are loosing, so lets place not one, but four white women in a ad with a 1/2 black man. nswer me this: why do repubs not put black women in their ads when the man is white?
they are race baiting, but it will not work this time. mccain is not winning this year, he is bush all over.
August 12, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't take the bait. The GOP wants to talk about race, so that they do not have to talk about issues.
August 12, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed.
August 12, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign won't even bother responding to this web ad.
Next week will be all about Obama's VP choice and his biography and the week after that will be all about the Dem convention.
August 12, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain Great White Hope?
August 12, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great White Hype
August 12, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was going to say the "great white dope."
After his saber rattling over the Russian incursion into Georgia I have to wonder if McCain has the foreign policy chops to be President. I think electing McCain President would be risky. He could get us into a shooting war over very little or nothing.
August 12, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow,,,,,,,,, four *young*, *white*, *women*,,,,, ageist, racist, sexist,,,,, not to mention polygamy all rolled into one,,,, talk about campaign bundling!,,,,, note to Amish folks,no double entant on bundling.
August 12, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is clearly targeted to the over 65 white Pennsylvania Elks's Club demographic, with whom, as we know from today's brilliant, incisive, analysis in today's WaPo, Obama has a terrible, likely disasterious, problem that probably means that Obama's consistent, rock-solid polling lead in the Keystone State is some sort of mirage--though its best not to get a lot of data involved in such brilliant, incisive pieces.
Based upon the WaPo's careful scientific sampling of four or five old people in rural Pennsyalvania, as well as their vague, implicit allustion to polls they apparently forgot to actually, cite, this important demographic wants all these gyrating young punks and sluts who are disrespectful to their elders and have had everything given to them on a silver platter their whole lives, unlike themselves who grew up tough economic environment of the 1950s, to GET OFF THEIR DAMN LAWNS!
And this important commercial is carefully targeted to motivate and empower that movement. Except for the fact that McCain only released it on that newfangled Internet thing which these people don't know how to use.
August 12, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hilarious comment.
August 12, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not going to say that everyone in the press is in the tank for McCain, but I will say that everyone having anything to do with election coverage want things to be so much closer than they show signs of being. To that end, there's apparently no lengths that they aren't willing to go to.
August 12, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I would add, there is no swaying that group. You are right on target, they worked hard, not like these young people with their second mortgages for their ski boats.
I will go one further. Embarrassing as it is to say, my mom lives in a retirement community in Arizona, and her grandson, my brother's adopted half-black child, was visiting and swam in the community pool. No sh*t, rumor has it they drained the pool after the visit and refilled. But hey, they aren't racist.
August 12, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
In 2004, 22% of the over 65 crowd used the internet. Do you think 22% of the highest voter turnout demographic should be ignored by McCain and by Obama? And do you think that the 22% figure has remained unchanged?
These anecdotes that criticize the over 65 crowd are simply dumb and are on the same level as McCain's ad where apparently the only Obama supporters are under 20 and a bit short on brain power. I think it's very clear what McCain is saying--and I'm sure the over 65 crowd that manages to access the Internet through their dementia fog (sarcasm) can find that ad.
August 12, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steve, that's the first time I've heard anyone say the name of the scariest state I can think of out loud. Pennsylvania. Can you imagine the disaster if McCain wins Pennsylvania? How many points in the PA polls should we discount for the Bradley effect?
August 12, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
desperation, innit?
they have nothing in the tank but slime.
August 12, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I wrote a blog yesterday analyzing the "coincidence" that all of the black rockstar's swooning fans were white girls. You can be sure that wasn't an accident, and you can be sure the code wasn't lost on anyone south of the Mason-Dixon:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/08/mccains-latest-ad-absolutely-childish.html
August 12, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Then we need to expose the 'formula' these swiftboaters are using.
August 12, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, Obama cannot comment on the ad. However, this is based on the same sort of ad that was used against Harold Ford in Tennessee. It was decried nation wide by the party and press as being racist. I agree that Obama cannot play the race card. However, the intent is clearly racist and just more subtle than the Ford ad by fitting into the "empty suit" argument. This is where the press should be jumping in and asking the question and showing how it follows the lead of the Ford ad. It is targeted at older voters and areas of the South. Note the number of pundits raised in the South who recognize the code words used therein.
August 12, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
And what the press will never ackowledge, or, indeed ever be able to get its nonexistent collective brain around, is that the "empty suit" slime is dogwhistle racism.
Harvard Law, Magna cum laude, B.A. Columbia. President of the HLR. Con law professor at the University of Chicago. Political career forged in the crucible of Chicago poltiics. Author of two best-sellers that he actually wrote himself.
If he were white, we'd be getting the elitistist eggheaded ivory tower in-tee-lect-shul who never did an honest days work in his life smear, the corrupt Chicago politician smear and, possibly, the inexperience smear. But we would never, ever see either primary or general election opponents referring to a white guy with that resume as "an empty suit." The button really getting pushed is "hell, we all know they ain't as smart as us real people and if he got into all them fancy schools it hadta be 'cause of a affirmative action quota that kept some actual deserving hardworking young white person from being accepted."
Oh, and look at them white girls throw themselves at him. Disgusting, ain't it?
August 12, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, sir. As a thirty-nine-year-old white boy, I must say, this whole campaign has been an education. I thought I understood racism, but I didn't know diddlysquat.
Frankly, I don't know how black people survive without going crazy. Racism is so f***ng insidious. It comes out in all these subtle assumptions -- like the one you've just accurately described. And then, if you call it out, you're "angry" and "playing the race card" etc. etc.
Jesus. But whatever. He'll win anyway.
August 12, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for your insightful comment. Most people seem to only be aware of this during the election. But, for a great majority of African American's this is an unfortunate part of our lives...on jobs, shopping, etc.
Not trying to play victim here, because just because we encounter it, does not mean we accept it.
I'm a little glad that it is being openly displayed so we can all get out of the false illusion we had that everything was okay, and alright.
I wonder if anyone will see this race-baiting as an increased need for Affirmative Action?
Okay, I'm ducking now :)
August 12, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm waiting for them to dig up the "white" person who didn't get into Harvard because Obama did.
August 12, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
So apparently Obama forgot to tell Harvard he was only half white. (that might be folklore, but it is going around, so I thought I'd mention it)
I'd love to meet the guy who didn't get into Annapolis but for John McCain's call to glory (or was that honor).
August 12, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could have saved the guy's life. :) Know what you mean.
August 12, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that would be a great campaign slogan:
"I got into Annapolis so someone else wouldn't have to. John McCain. Country first."
August 12, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
If I could interject here on the white women throwing themselves at Barack angle, he's kind of inoculated on that because he's married to a black woman. The Harold Ford ad was a sick and effective race-baiting trio attack:
1. warns racist white men that Harold Ford is after your womens.
2. tries to imply to black folks in general that he's not black enough.
3. tries to create resentment of black women against black men who date white women.
The only folks the racial angle works in this McCain ad for are racists who already won't be supporting Obama anyway. Why are we counting white faces in the ad instead of attacking the substance that Obama supporters are supposedly silly, ill-informed and unserious.
That said, there are plenty of black, hispanic, asian etc. hot women digging Obama at rallies. I suspect the McCain campaign is enjoying all the free airplay focused on counting the white folks. This just gives this stupid ad even more free exposure without countering the baseless assumption that Obama supporters are into him as some kind of fad.
August 12, 2008 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Why are we counting white faces in the ad instead of attacking the substance that Obama supporters are supposedly silly, ill-informed and unserious."
I'm trying to learn to lay off of the high soft ones. :)
August 12, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is Obama's ad about McCain following in the footsteps of Bush? Hugging Bush, supporting Bush's anti-vet legislation on the GI Bill? When is Obama going to put McC on the defensive?
August 12, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121850408634131921.html
August 12, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm. You call that being on the defensive?
August 12, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, little Jake, how did you spend your summer vacation?
Counting white women in McCain's "Hot Chicks" ad.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
August 12, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
its exactly the same as Harold Ford... RACIST!!!
First, they put two white very blonde very sexualized "celebrities" to compare to Obama, now they have FOUR MORE white women tossing sexual innuendo towards our African-American candidate. Is this innocent? HELL NO! They aim to raise the age-old racist spector of an 'uppity' black man violating 'our white women'... Sickening. 'Celebrity' is just the sheep's clothing barely hiding the wolf of pure RACISM.
This is racial swiftboating and SOMEBODY better call them on it YESTERDAY! Where are the surrogates?
This is not what Americans want, this is not what Democrats or Independents want... lets call them on it !
August 12, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, what they really want is to be called on it, and then to go on Fox news playing innocent. That's what they want.
A web ad isn't worth sh*t unless it generates that kind of fuss.
August 12, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't want to respond to this kind of post. It is too silly? Please take it off
August 12, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Had Obama simply agreed to town hall meetings, John McCain would have only needed to put three young white women in the ad.
August 12, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
David Broder? Is that you?
August 12, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
SEVEN! Seven young white wo . . .
wait a sec . . .
August 12, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Regardless of the content of the ad, this all becomes an endless discussion over a McCain Internet ad that gets no TV play except that which is freely provided ad infinitum within the echo chamber.
August 12, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think calling racism on this add is a productive use of our time. I mean sure you could make the argument that juxtaposing a white women in an ad about a black candidate is designed to trigger reactions in retrograde minds, but for the vast majority of people it's not going to be offensive or even something they'd think about if it wasn't pointed out to them.
On the other hand, there are lots and lots people who are irritated by what they see as PC hypersensitivity. By overreacting to these ads there is a chance that we'd turn off far more people then the ads would on their own. In fact, that could very well be the 'real' point. Anyone who's racist enough to be turned off by the thought of Obama and white women probably wouldn't end up voting for him anyway.
But there could be libertarian/south park types would be happy to vote for a black person in general but not someone they see as a hypersensitive PC over reactor, some of those people are not going to be able to distinguish between Obama and the MSM who keeps harping on this crap.
And also, if McCain had run an ad with only black women, that would have been seen as offensive by a lot of people as well (Obviously)
And if he had used women of all different races, he would have been dinged for playing the xenophobia angle (Obama is the 'outsider' who attracts 'foreign' women)
--
Finally, they ignore what's actually offensive about the ads, that this is a campaign for the presidency of the United States, and this add is completely fucking childish. It shows how much McCain actually respects the presidency and the people. Not very much.
August 12, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should counter this with an ad just showing a group of his 65-and up year old supporters talking about why they support him and why they think McCain is a crappy candidate who insultingly suggests that only young star-struck people support Obama. In fact, a series of such ads.
And he could leaven it with humor; they could refer to themselves as "hot chicks."
"Hi, I'm John Smith, I'm 82 years old. I've never heard of Bono, but I support Barack Obama because he has a real plan for alternative energy and he will restore America's position in the world."
"Hi, I'm Mary Evans, I'm 76 years old. My husband still calls me a hot chick, but I support Barack Obama because he's honest about the problems we face, and he's going to provide health care for all Americans."
August 12, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like your style. Great approach.
August 12, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like It...
August 12, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
excellent.
August 12, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Have a matching ad with non-groupie young supporters to counter the image of all Obama supporters being of a certain "type".
August 12, 2008 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sublime response!
Since racism in the ad is fairly subtle, it's doubtful that most white people would get what the big deal is, it the Obama people made a fuss. Obama's best bet, is to deflect McCain's ad with humor and save their big guns for more overt stuff.
August 12, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great idea. You should tell them.
August 12, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Push, push, push the race issue....
This has been the mantra of the media for months. Please TPM, do not fall into this trap by offering up lightweight shit like this.
August 12, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
This may, or may not be an issue. But Tapper is the last one who has the credibility to be pushing it, since he completely shot it down, the first time it was suggested. Between Jake Tapper, Cokie Roberts, Sam Donaldson, fill in the blank, ABC has the worst political pundits on TV. Fareed Zakaria was the only competent member of the network and had since enough to leave and start his own show, which is great!
August 12, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
you're right about zakaria. his show is good even though it's on CNN. Fareed's a jolly good fellow!
August 12, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The question should be asked; where are the Black women, since he's getting 90% of the Black vote, and everyone is complaining bout that; isnโt logical that "we" should have been front and center cheering him on and finding him "hot", not Whites, especially white women?
Clearly dog whistling going on here BIG time.
August 12, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
RACIST McCain campaign, is that better for you?!?!?!?!
August 12, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
None of the chicks in that video are "hot."
August 12, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever, if it were a bunch of black women saying he's hot that would be called racist too. I don't really see how it's so racist honestly - maybe I'm just part of that post racial constituency. I don't really see race in this ad. If you do, maybe you have a problem too. Fact is, young women from all backgrounds think he's hot - the problem to me isn't picking clips of white women saying it (there are probably a lot more clips of white women saying it as there are a lot more white women in this country than black, just a fact).
The problem is cheapening his appeal by making it seem purely sexual and whim. Painting peoples' attraction to him as empty, silly, and based on looks. Which is much more of an insult to us than it is to Obama. The truth is a lot of people are deeply attracted to Obama, but it is because he speaks to a crucial part of our being, regardless of whether we think he's hot or not. He's someone who many of us do feel can represent us, speak our language, and we like his plan for the future, and it's insulting of John McCain to imply we're driven by such frivolty.
Take that, sucka.
August 12, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your right,...the McCain camp is telling the Obama Supporters,...you're like a bunch of women in an Beatles concert jumping up and down in hysteria for no reason,......Well guess what Grandpa,...it's time to throw those Lawrence Welk albums away and join the revolution.,...because it's not just flowery speeches, its not just big crowds, it's really because he's the only guy in the field with enough humility, intelligence, and judgement to bring this country and most importantly the world together to solve issues like health care, energy crisis, the economy, education, and global warming. The Republican's plan is the same one as they've had the last 8 years. The republican's tactics are beneath the values that we share,...whatever they're trying to provoke,...it won't work.
August 12, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure your postings are thoughtful and witty. Just wish I could get past your avatar!
August 12, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I want to know is why anybody would want white women if they could have black women. That's what I call absurd.
August 12, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to feed the meme Billy, but the problem is not what black men want. It's what white men fear white women want. It's the inadequacy thing, son.
August 12, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, yeah. There was a book or something about that, wasn't there? And then there was that black porn star, John Holmes. I remember now.
August 12, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I actually find these ads reassuring and as much an ad for Obama as anything. I mean, after spending a lifetime watching MTV, the youth vote (under 50) is definitely going to want to vote for a popular phenomenon, dug by hot chicks, preferably, like, 30 of them bitches in short shorts and skimpy tops.
In all seriousness, the effectiveness of these adds is very questionable and the fact that they are around now means:
1) These ads is all McCain has to run on. (Along with other forms of surges - an iraq surge, an afghan surge, an economic surge, a surge in McCain's pants when he pops a little blue pill and thinks of Obama and all the hot chicks.)
2) Whatever effect these types of ads have will be dulled to the point of irrelevance come Nov. Some independent observer may actually get around to pointing out a pattern of racial undertones by then. I would be more worried if the McCain camp were holding their own in the polls and holding back these kinds of negative ads to drop late October. Then they might be damaging, now they are an innoculation. That they're floating around in August means they are extremely desperate.
August 12, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish people would learn to relax. These ads aren't hurting Obama, they are simply digging John McCain's grave. By portraying Obama as a lightweight McCain is flirting with disaster. In a couple of months the debates will begin and McCain is inadvertantly setting the bar extremely high for himself. McCain will need to crush Obama or his claims of superior leadership and experience will be thrown out the window.
August 12, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama may crush himself the first time he makes McCain laugh at him. If you have never seen McCain debate, you are in for a shock.
August 12, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
what is McCain like in a debate? No, I haven't seen him.
August 12, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Relaxed, sarcastic and direct. Can anybody tell me who picked Oxford, MS for the first debate venue?
August 12, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
That wasn't an accident.
August 12, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Sargent would be doing us a service if he did a count of how many times Mr. Tapper's blogs have mentioned race. ABC not only covered the Toby Keith comments in two on line articles (including a Tapper piece) they did video on it even though there was no footage. And they did it two or three days after it happened. The McCain campaign does not have to play the race card. ABC is doing it for them and TPM is ignoring it.
August 12, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
We don't need to react to McCain. We need to take on ABC. They went batty over Jesse Jackson, Bernie Mac, Toby Keith, and of course launched the theme that Obama was first accusing McCain of the race card. As long as ABC remains unscatherd they will play the race card for McCain.
August 12, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy Glad's count of ordinary looking human beings in the ad: Zero. Text. There is no good reason to support Obama. Subtext. All Obama supporters are young or wierd or both.
The best thing from McCain's point of view is the ad supports the McCain brand. It's funny and disrespectful.
One of the best things that has happened to politics is the rule that candidates have to associate themselves with their negative ads. Since everything in the ad gets hung around the candidate's neck, i.e., associated with the candidate, that one rule has done a lot to rein in the attack ads. Normally, no one wants to look at pictures of ugly nerds. By using humor, McCain gets it through without getting himself associated with images of ugly nerds. He ends up associated with beautiful blonds. There are some smart people doing those McCain ads. And please. No charges of sexism. I'm just reporting from the scene.
August 12, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Audio from the spot is up here.
August 12, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you guys see the George Will comment in that same episode of This Week where Gergen had to school Tapper about the subtleties of polite conversation about race?
(I transcribed this exactly including the Stepahnopolous interjection at the end):
George Will: "The crowning, crashing irony of this year is that the first African American president to be nominated by a major party has the wekness of being too upper crust. That is, he is Columbia University, Harvard Law School. He is just not..." Stepahanopolous: "Arugala arugala"
here's the video (starts around 1:48)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cMQzPd70fU
August 12, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Arugala arugala
Is that some sort of code for fried chicken and watermelon?
What "crust" exactly does an African American need to reside on to be taken seriously by the blabbing heads of mediocrity/mediacracy?
August 12, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
obama should not be appearing with all these white girls in these ads. it looks bad. he is part black after all. and he was real mean to mrs. hillary. who does he think he is anyhow? scarfing and wolfing that arugula all the time. it is just awful.
August 12, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know. I'm so upset about it I'm going to go to church and then go hunting.
August 12, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain people aren't clinging to their guns or religion, Billy. They are clutching their inadequate Johnson's in fear of the defection of white womanhood.
August 12, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulGdqcez2JM&NR=1
I've put this up before. One of my favorites.
August 12, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
A lot og gum-flapping (110 comments) about whether this McCain ad is racist and how Obama should respond.
Forget about it.
The ad clearly doesn't sink to the "Harold, call me" level.
Save the outrage for when McCain gets truly desperate and does go that blatant. In October, he may decide he has to.
Plus, the current ad is innocuous.
Hot chicks DO dig Obama.
What, nobody noticed before? Why do you think the Obama Girl videos work?
White chicks, black chicks.
Young, old. Lots of guys, too.
Face it, Obama is one attractive dude.
And stressing this helps McCain's message HOW?
Obama's attractive, but -- unless you're the kind of racist who would never vote for him anyway --it's a real stretch to see him as sexually threatening.
In real life, he's a parent, and solidly married.
To a black woman, so no red lines crossed there.
And even in the dark psychic recesses of the our imaginary typical white voter, Obama passes muster.
(Slow dissolve. Suburbia, Middle America.)
Maybe you're a bit suprised when he comes to pick up your daughter -- you thought his name was O'Bama.
But he's polite, clean-cut, obviously smart.
And hey, he's really up on his NBA stats, too.
Smiles easily, gets your lame jokes.
And as they're heading out the door, he turns, looks you in the eye, and says, "I'll have her home by midnight, Mr. Jones -- and I won't lay a finger on her."
So refreshingly straightforward after that George creep she used to go out with. You instinctively want to trust him.
Deep down, you know they're going to fool around a little bit, but maybe without actual penetration.
And if they do, he's the kind of responsible guy who'll use protection.
And that's a change you can believe in.
August 12, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really fucking tired of the phrase "race card". Really really tired of it. It's not a damn card and this is not a game.
August 12, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hot chicks dig Obama.
The One.
Two new phrases for our lexicon.
All of the people in the ad are white.
That's because McCain is making fun of YOU.
He's saying white liberals are totally clueless.
This post and thread pretty much demonstrate he's right.
August 12, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
How does it feel to be above all that?
August 12, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch! Now I'm going to have to make a novena and go hunting and fishing all on the same weekend to get over my bitterness.
August 12, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're not clueless, Billy. But the news flash is that the video has been taken off YouTube.
August 12, 2008 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think they put it back up, but without Josh and Greg in the last shot. I think they got into a copyright issue. Josh and Greg didn't want them using the shot of them bowing to Obama.
August 12, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
August 12, 2008 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
a novena? you're one of those godless romanists? sorry, this is a christian country!
August 12, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of my favorite lines is: "I figured you for some kind of kneeler." :)
August 12, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
does obama fuck the white chicks on the video? i haven't seen it yet. he should apologise if he did.
August 12, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lame!
Ignorant!
Barack Obama is better than this.
Somehow, I'm afraid this kind of ad works.
America isn't above this fearmongering...yet.
Reality is, many people fear this kind of edgy, "jump on the bandwagon" aura he exudes.
For the rest of us, we need to just wait.
America is still getting to know Obama.
GOP'ers will not get the last laugh this time
See you in November!
August 12, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm going to write in Cobra Commander on my ballot. He may be evil, but at least I know what he stands for.
August 12, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Formerly NCSteve gave us a preview of McCain's next attack meme:
Hot chicks want to hold Obama rallies on your lawn !!!
August 13, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we can conclude that John McCain is a sexist pig. The way he treats his wife (wives), his attitudes regarding womens health, his insults to Senator Clinton etc., etc. Any woman who votes for him is not looking at him close enough.
August 13, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would bet McCain's "known" more blond bimbos than most Democrats, he seems to have a predisposition for girls who look like Hitler youth, then when they get a bit wrinkled, he discards them for the next one..
Stereotypical blond bimbos in McCain's past...we know of at least two, anyone bet there's more?
August 14, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink