« GOP Senator's Top Staffer Busted Posting Comments Under Fake Name On Liberal Blog | Home | GOPers Promise To "ROMP" In This Fall's House Races »
Webb Spokesperson: Um, No, We Didn't Attack McCain's Service
Jim Webb spokesperson Kimberly Hunter sends us a statement rejecting the McCain campaign's accusation that he collaborated with the Obama camp to attack McCain's service...
I can tell you that Senator Webb has never spoken with Senator Obama about this issue nor has he spoken to Wesley Clark. Senator Webb's comments were not targeted at McCain's military service. He has consistently called for politicians not to insert politics into military service. This is the exact same argument that he used against Lindsay Graham last year in their Meet the Press interview regarding objections to giving troops adequate dwell time at home.Senator Webb has never, and would never, demean the service of anyone who has stepped forward to serve our country. To the contrary, he was calling on those on all sides of the debate to refrain from implying that their political views are representative of the military writ large.
Of course, Webb is now in an argument about whether he demeaned McCain's military service.
Discuss.
Advertisement















Good statement.
July 1, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
You've got to wonder - does McCain really think they're getting this much out of it?
I think they just want to make sure everyone knows he was a POW, so this is an opportunity to hammer it into their heads.
July 1, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of the unintended benefits of the long Democratic Party primary campaign seems to be that Barack Obama endured a long, tough battle and built up a pretty thick hide.
To me, the McCain campaign is coming across like not-ready-for-prime-time crybabies. They need to toughen up and stop with all of this mock outrage and hurt feelings.
I think it simply makes McCain look weak.
July 1, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm finding that in this campaign and perhaps politics at large, hyperventilating about an issue tends not to help. Witness McCain and this Clark silliness. Clark and Webb's statements were pitch perfect, and the longer McCain wants to go down this road, the more it is to his detriment.
July 1, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. The more McCain tries to make an issue of this, the more he looks like he's on the defensive, and the more likely it is people start to think, "hey, maybe Clark and Webb do have a point after all".
And Obama's hands are entirely clean.
July 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure how this is playing to the general public. It sure looks like McBush wants to stir things up. If he's not careful someone is going to ask him to release all of his military records. From what I read it will show that his career reached a dead end and that he was sort of a screw-up.
July 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
You aren't kidding about that:
http://drinkliberal.blogspot.com/2008/02/lobbying-for-truth-behind-mccain.html
If he has to start talking about his years in the military we can start with his skirt chasing years. Then start to discuss "how a career soldier with with major connections (daddy and granddaddy were admirals) never made it past Captain?"
And there are many "more dubious" stories on whether or not he gave information to the enemy when he was captured. And a lot of those were courtesy of right wing smears left over attacks from his primary fight against bush in 2000.
July 3, 2008 2:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do a google search for Colonel David Hackworth John McCain to see what an actual war hero had to say about McCain.
July 1, 2008 9:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hack (RIP) was great!
July 3, 2008 2:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
People like Webb. I think it's incredibly stupid for the McCain camp to pursue this with him. Clark is a more polarizing figure, Camp McCain should have left well enough alone.
July 1, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Webb's military credentials are impeccable. An ex-Marine. Former Secretary of the Navy during the Reagan regime. And he was never shot down. ;-)
July 1, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all of the problems going on in this country, THIS is the kind of BS political reporters (TPM included) spend their time covering?
One thing is for sure: This entire discussion, and the fomenters of it (political media, McCain camp, etc.) shows one thing writ large: THE ESTABLISHMENT DOESN'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT AMERICANS' PROBLEMS.
Personally, continued discussion on this non-topic is pointless, divisive, and disruptive of our political process. I am disgusted by all parties going after Clark, and through him Obama, on an "issue" that has zero relevance and zero resonance with the American public, other than as a backdoor attack on Democrats in general as "not respecting the troops."
TPM, among others, should step up, say this is utter CRAP, and stop covering it. End of story.
July 1, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I feel your frustration, Angry Vet, but if Clark and Webb (uncoordinated, of course!) can finally slap down and put to sleep the theme that the Democrats don't respect the troops, well, then, I say, carry on, gentlemen!
July 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not happening. The political media has found a familiar narrative and theya re going to run with it. Never you mind McCain was against the GI Bill before he was for it. Never you mind DEMOCRATS pushed through same bill. Never you mind DEM's want out of Iraq.
This is all utter garbage, and you tactical thinkers out there are thinking too much for your own good. Low information voters are going to hear "POW attacked over war service by DEM's" and THAT IS IT! The damage, people, has already been done on this thing.
July 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
low info voters sure didn't seem to care when Kerry was attacked.
July 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's because Republicans weren't the ones being mean to Vietnam vets. It was the dirty fucking hippies --> Democrats. Everyone, aside from the media, adheres to familiar narratives. This is simply more of the same.
July 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps. Since it is all military men in the squabble, I think there is a chance it won't come off as bad to the low-info people.
The media is in the bad for McCain right now. That's the biggest problem.
July 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Low infos don't necessarily know that Webb is a vet. they do know, reading the report, that Webb is (D-VA). DEMOCRAT.
Clark is the same way. D-NATO, or wherever. You give teh low-info voter way too much credit.
Is that elitist? Probably. More likely, though, this comment is based on my general dislike of people who wave the flag and say the right things, but neglect their basic duty as a citizen.
I point to Justice Brandeis:
"The most important political office is that of the private citizen."
Not many in this country take that seriously. I'm glad y'all do, but we're a minority.
July 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You may be right about the low infos. Perhaps i am being too hopeful.
July 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. The right wing already laid the groundwork concerning doubt about McCains service in the 2000 primary campaign. Politically it is exploitable. Ethically? Not such a good thing. But it is exploitable.
July 3, 2008 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Low information voters are also going to hear "the former commander of NATO doesn't think McCain's service qualifies him for President".
July 1, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope. They'll just hear "former Democratic presidential candidate." The '90's are a lifetime away.
July 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
No.
I think they'll hear "General Wesley Clark doesn't think McCain's service qualifies him for President."
July 1, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn. Only "General" should be bold.
July 1, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that Webb is famous enough for his service being the Marine that he obviously is that he will be able to make this argument in a way that Gen Clark cannot. He is good at calling people on their BS.
July 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. I have been saying that for two days now and not getting any traction. Maybe you can get some traction on this issue. It is a total lose, lose proposition for obama regardless of the point trying to be made. Thank you.
July 1, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have to come down on the side of angry vet on this one.
July 1, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the reaction is a sort of story in itself, albeit more appropriate fodder for Greg's Horse's Mouth blog, as it's precisely that reaction that is newsworthy: people are making wildly exaggerated claims about what Clark allegedly said. Clark never denigrated McCain's service itself; he repeated his admiration of it.
He didn't "dis" McCain, nor did he trash him, nor did he say anything untrue (and thus he in no way "Swiftboated" him). He did express his opinion that McCain's military service wasn't relevant to being president. The reaction from much of the media about this, and their mis-characterization of what Clark actually said, is the real story here.
July 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is why this entire story is BS. Inattentive political media types paid little attention to detail, and just ran with a press release, considering that the unvarnished truth.
Total BS. And not one of these political reporters are countering the silliness of the allegation. Something is rotten inside the Beltway, and it ain't necessarily the government. Fourth estate, my ass. More like just another cabinet level position in the White House.
July 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least TPM (and others, such as The Columbia Journalism Review and Media Matters) is saying that the media reaction is both inaccurate and over the top.
You're right that it's still not substantive discourse on truly relevant issues, like foreign or energy policy. The most successful GOP tactic of the past 30 years was starting and perpetuating the meme that the mainstream media is "liberal", and, worse, that it is biased.
On this "issue" they're showing that they really are McCain's base.
July 1, 2008 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yo Greg,
have you read Arianna's blog about Obama's tack to the center
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/memo-to-obama-moving-to-t_b_110026.html
"Running to the middle in an attempt to attract undecided swing voters didn't work for Al Gore in 2000. It didn't work for John Kerry in 2004. And it didn't work when Mark Penn (obsessed with his "microtrends" and missing the megatrend) convinced Hillary Clinton to do it in 2008.
Fixating on -- and pandering to -- this fickle crowd is all about messaging tailored to avoid offending rather than to inspire and galvanize. And isn't galvanizing the electorate to demand fundamental change the raison d'etre of the Obama campaign in the first place? "
"So why start playing to the political fence sitters -- staking out newly nuanced positions on FISA, gun control laws, expansion of the death penalty, and NAFTA?
In an interview with Nina Easton in Fortune Magazine, Obama was asked about having called NAFTA "a big mistake" and "devastating." Obama's reply: "Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified."
Overheated? So when he was campaigning in the Midwest, many parts of which have been, yes, devastated by economic changes since the passage of NAFTA, and he pledged to make use of a six-month opt-out clause in the trade agreement, that was "overheated?" Or was that one "amplified?"
Because if that's the case, it would be helpful going forward if Obama would let us know which of his powerful rhetoric is "overheated" and/or "amplified," so voters will know not to get their hopes too high."
Will we get an opinion from you on this?
July 1, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, I think we've had our fill of "FISA cave" posts on TPM, thanks.
July 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
this one talks about Nafta too
July 1, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
And death penalty for child rapists. Boy, I'm torn up he caved on that!
July 1, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe you. You're tough as steel. I don't think there is anything that would tear you up. You're golden! No worries.
July 1, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not true. I almost got really depressed when my bipartisan candidate started acting bipartisan. Luckily there was a Ziggy comic nearby to cheer me up.
July 1, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Good for you. It's good to know how to take care of yourself," he added to accent is original post with another comment, thinking it really is a bad strategy to be mushy in the general.
July 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
God I do love your comments.
That one is absolutely classic.
July 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
it totally is awesome.
July 1, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, another comment about FISA and Obama is certainly relevant to an entry about Webb....if you want Greg to comment on it, why not just send an e-mail to him?
July 1, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
then I wouldn't get policing posts from you.
July 1, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was a real suggestion, indie pro. Go to the source, rather than putting comments in a post that has nothing to do with your issue du jour.
July 1, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll take it under advisement. Thanks for you care and concern.
July 1, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your're welcome.
July 1, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. The same video I linked in the other thread.
July 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keith Olbermann had Senator Webb on his show last night and during the segment about McBush taking credit for the G.I. bill, KO asked Senator Webb about this very issue. Check out the link to Countdown.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#25465967
July 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I say if McSame wants to talk about his military career and of course the adoring media will comply, then let's talk about it. It ain't pretty, the only redeeming spot would be serving as a POW and being tortured. The rest is pure elite son of an admiral special treatment.
I love the way Webb can steal the frame away from a media whore. The part about being calm is sooo good when addressing McSame. We always need to remember we're not fighting just McBush but the media too and people such as Webb, who is smart and can cut through media framing is just what the doctor ordered.
July 1, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously, McCain camp looks like bunch of high school jerks.
July 1, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
more like 'discuss'ting
I'm deeply frustrated at MSM's inability to reflect on their judgement. They cling to their image of their great American hero, their Vietnam G.I. Joe fighting to save the day...
When they feel their dream or "hope" questioned, they react as if attacked and immediately call 'foul' on anyone questioning their hero.
In this General Election, two types of hope are battling it out, the Obama hope, and the MSM's hope (which unfortunately is also McCain's hope). So naturally to win, the MSM reacts to Obama's vision with cynicism.
It's so sad to see. The MSM is still in love, and they are resisting Obama's message because they're only capable of judging the situation with one heart. McCain won that in 2000.
They lack in judgement.
What can we do about it? GRRRRRRRRRR.
How quickly will the MSM get over their G.I. McCain love.
I hope soon.
July 1, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Concur.
Except, drop the first "e" in "judgement." Pet peeve of a lawyer....
July 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The brits have an e in there.
July 1, 2008 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you questioning his valour when it comes to spelling? He may have rushed to judgement on this issue before he had all of the facts but we should still honour his service and give him an E for effort. /snark
July 3, 2008 2:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there a way out of this quagmire?
One strategy for Obama might be to double down by calling the media on their refusal to listen to reason. It's risky but that kind of tactic worked for Hillary.
The media is playing the bully boy. It may be that the only thing that will stop them at this point is a show of strength. I could be wrong, though.
Anyone?
July 1, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like it. The media, however, also likes to beat up on the frontrunner, since that creates a closer raise which equals more ratings.
The media is not un-biased. They have their own interests to consider as well.
July 1, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep.
The minute he became the front runner, I knew the MSM would overplay everything that happens because they don't want to look biased. (roflmao!)
Actually, because they need a story, dammit, and they need one that will last a little while before they have to get another one - *sigh* will the facts ever go away and leave me in peace? the harried journalist asks, back of hand to forehead...
July 1, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
However, McCain is trying to immunize himself against any suggesting that being a war hero doesn't make one all knowing. His POW status is one of prime issues. He can't run on republican policies without being laughed off the stage.
By setting up the meme that the Democrats, already painted as not supporting the troops, will now be accused of not respecting McCain's service and thus, not free to mention his bogus claim to leadership.
The only thing that stands in the way of this narrative are people like Webb and Clark. So hey, let's Swiftboat them as they did yesterday and again today on a conference call with the Swifties and republican senators during which the attacked Clark's service.
To date, the Democrats and the press seem perfectly willing to go along.
July 1, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
How are they swiftboating Clark and Webb? No one has attacked their service, and that's what swiftboating is.
Frankly, I'm not at concerned at this juncture about the Democrats on this - I think it's going fine. The idea got out there that McLame's POW status doesn't mean he's automatically presidential.
From there it's been a matter of who threw which spitwad first.
July 1, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
...And from which direction.
July 1, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's happened so many times it is now considered a 'variant'
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/judgement
July 1, 2008 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently, at one time, there was a shortage of Es and Us in America so they decided to conserve them and dropped them from the original spellings of many words. At one point the shortage was so severe they considered changing the name of the country to Amrica. Fortunately, after America won its freedom from Mother England the first treaty that followed the victory specified that America would get half of all of the Es in England, so now they have to call themselves Brits instead of English in order to conserve.
This is a little known variant of American history. Though, some claim Americans were just too lazy to write out the entire word...
July 3, 2008 3:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
D'oh! Taht was supoepsd to be in rlpey to 'Argny Vet' . . .
July 1, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think the screaming & crying by the McCain camp is an attempt to 'swift-boat' Webb & Clark. Whether deserved or not, McCain's got enough military cred with enough voters that criticism from Webb & Clark isn't going to do too much damage.
What I think they are trying to do is to portray Obama as a normal politician waging despicable personal attacks on McCain through surrogates. That's the theme of all of their whining. Last week it was flip-flopping on campaign finance (regular politician), this week personal attacks (regular politician). You can hear it now: "Now, that's not change you can believe in (deliver stiffly while weakly smiling at the camera)."
On the other hand, I think there's a little of bit of goading of McCain going on in the Obama camp. They seem pleased to let McCain get worked up over various things, and once he gets worked up, they seem pleased to let it go on for a while.
July 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
But McCain is going overboard, apologies for the pun.
It's one thing for the media to play up and even manufacture a controversy, it's another for them to be so ludicrously one-sided. It's worrisome in terms of how they will play the entire election season.
Unlike the wise and wonderful TenaX, I didn't see this coming.
July 1, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just finished reading Webb's latest book, A Time to Fight, in which he makes the point that military service, specifically combat troops in theater, should not be used to score political points.
As the statement points out, Webb has also expressed this view on the talk circuit to push back against the "let our troops win" and "withdrawal is surrender" nonsense.
I am delighted with the way this is unfolding. It is all good for Obama.
July 1, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't been able to watch any of the coverage on TV today.
What's the conventional wisdom right now?
July 1, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is what's on Washington Post:
"Reluctantly weighing in on the ongoing controversy over former general Wesley Clark, presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama dismissed any comparison between Clark's comments on John McCain's Vietnam service and the Swift Boat campaign of 2004 impugning Sen. John Kerry's war record.
"I don't think Gen. Clark had the same intent as the Swift Boat ads we saw four years ago and I reject that analogy," he said in a wide-ranging news conference. He added that he honors "with the utmost respect" McCain's service in Vietnam as a fighter pilot and a prisoner of war.
The Clark comments continue to reverberate on the campaign trail, in large part because McCain's campaign has kept the controversy alive through conference calls with reporters. "
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/01/obama_weighs_in_on_clark_comme.html
But, it's buried in the Daily Campaign Diary with 3 other items - all about Obama, including one that says that he's "shunning the fist bump."
More telling is that the campaign page is dominated by a big picture of Obama and the headline article is about his proposal for the faith-based initiatives. I think that's what will be driving the news cycle.
July 1, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hopefully. He lost the news cycle yesterday for his stellar patriotism speech over clark's nonsense. As opposed to coverage of obama's speech, we had repeated pictures of mcbush as a pow and commentary about how dems are attacking mcbush's patriotism. Bad newsday yesterday for obama.
July 1, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder how much longer before McCain's whining about being attacked about his war record will make him look like a big ole pussy, especially when he whines one moment and attacks Obama the next. What a weenie. I know the press is in the bag for McCain, but at some point taking every little thing as an attack makes him look like an overly sensitive, grumpy old man. And who wants their grumpy crotchety grandpa as president?
After finally seeing the much ballyhoed Clark comment, where he essentially repeated what his interviewer asked him, after his interviewer had already asked him the same basic question about six times, made me wonder again what planet the MSM is on to blow something so inconsequential so very far out of proportion. Sigh. It's going to be a long election season. Rove may be back in Texas, but his tactics survive.
July 1, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where to begin?
Start with irony:
--NO DEMOCRAT, not Clark, not Webb, not Obama or anyone remotely connected to these men or Obama's campaign has actually questioned, let alone criticized McCain's service.
--The only people (other than some fringe blog sites) who ever have are Republicans--the Bushies. I.e. Karl Rove and the boyz, who spread the rumor back in 2000 that McCain had willingly collaborated with the North Vietnamese, and was mentally unbalanced as a result of his imprisonment.
Move on to outrage:
--When the Swift Boat Liars cranked into gear, launching a campaign which directly attacked John Kerry's war record, the MSM feebly analyzed their attacks, concluded (the obvious) that they were complete BS, then never examined the strong evidence that the likes of Rove were directly involved, and allowed Bush to evade giving a definitive answer to whether he believed that there was any truth to their slanders.
With the Clark non-contraversy, the media are all aboard in the defense of St. McCain, who has always said he will never tell you that he is a war hero.
I could go on, but none of it would be news to any of one you...
Sigh.
Robert
July 1, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
If McCain tries to drag this out for another day, the time will have arrived to smack him in the nose. Give him a taste of the misogynistic, biased sort of invective that is so popular with Republicans:
Webb and Clark can tell McCain to stop being hysterical, to calm down, to mind his blood pressure, that he must be hard of hearing to have misinterpreted what Clark and Webb said, that he has again lost his bearings, that McCain is being cranky, and dyspeptic, and irregular, and demented.
This is a contact sport, guys. McCain has started hitting, so hit back, already. There must be some official non-surrogates who would enjoy taking some cheap shots.
July 1, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember when:
If you oppose the war you are against the troops.
Today it's
If you mention McSames military experience.
Your attacking him.
Right out of the Rove playbook!
July 2, 2008 7:41 AM | Reply | Permalink