Report: Obama Camp Considering Football Stadium For Acceptance Speech
The Associated Press is reporting tonight that the Obama campaign is considering a novel idea for staging his acceptance speech at the convention: Don't actually give it at the convention, but at a much larger venue in Denver.
Instead of speaking at the Pepsi Center, which seats 21,000 people, in this scenario Obama would speak at Invesco Field, the site of the Denver Broncos games that holds 76,000 -- an astonishing number for a political gathering. Obama previously spoke to a similar-sized crowd in the run-up to the Oregon primary, and could almost certainly fill the stadium for his acceptance speech.
Franklin Roosevelt began the tradition of nominees directly addressing their conventions back in 1932, and it's been taken for granted ever since then. But the Obama camp's idea, if put into practice, would seriously outdo FDR.
Late Update: As commenters have noted, Invesco Field is not across town from the Pepsi Center, but is in fact right nearby.

Comments (101)
I like the way this man thinks.
July 4, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah i like the idea it reminds me of a change from status quo
http://sensico.wordpress.com/
July 4, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, hopefully reporters in attendance will have passed some kind of intelligence test by then. No?
July 4, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meh.. I don't think this is a good idea at all.
The right wing bloggers would have a field day with this one; "What? The Pepsi Center isn't big enough for his ego?"
Yeah just no good, but I've been wrong before.
July 4, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm kinda with you.
July 4, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who cares what jealous people think?
Let 'em be jealous and busted.
Like he's going to cancel his plans and go home and think about what the naysayers will say.
July 4, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Kinda like Hillary Clinton's exasperated statement:
"Enough of the speeches and the big rallies"
July 4, 2008 8:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was funny! Goes over about as well as the "just words" critique, or the "giving people false hopes" critique.
July 4, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
The more impressive you can make a speech look, the better, I suppose. Let the right wing bloggers bitch. After the "whitey tape" turned out to be a figment of Larry Johnson's imagination, they've been hurting for material. What can they say? "Oh look at me, I'm Obama, people actually want me to speak!" Consider the pressure a huge speech puts on McCain, who barely manages to read his teleprompter.
July 4, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why the hell would you care what some windbag on the Right spews online? There would be 76,000 fucking people in the stands to see one man speak. Can you even wrap your minds around that?
Obama is thinking the right way here. The bigger, the better.
July 4, 2008 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
76,000 people would have memories of being there when...
pretty cool
July 4, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
That will be the story for a week, yes, and then... McCain will accept his nomination in the comparatively dinky Xcel Center.
...and it will be the "Green Screen" fiasco all over again, but at a much larger scale...
Ironic, considering that Obama upstaged McCain's now-historically pathetic event in New Orleans from the very same area where McCain will be (Xcel) when Obama does it again!
I don't know about you, but when I see political convention crowds, no matter how packed and excited, they have no credibility to me, since it consists only of the most ardent party supporters. But, in an open-air football stadium, it will look more like genuine enthusiasm (whether it really is or not).
It's pure advantageous politics, but I'd like to think that it's also a symbolic reflection of Obama's grassroots, "small-donor" constituency.
I mean, if McCain could pack a stadium that big, wouldn't that reflect well on him? The fact is, he can't. If Obama does do it, the Republicans will whine, but it will make them look bad, and the press will be too absorbed with directly and superficially comparing his speech to McCain's.
The shallow media could work in our favor in this case...
July 4, 2008 3:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to see Obama do it and spin it something like this:
"I feel an obligation to the many small donors who have made this campaign the success it has been. Therefore, rather than speaking to a live audience made up of our fine Party activists alone, I'd like to invite as many as possible of our grass-roots supporters to come for the acceptance speech. It is they who characterize the different kind of campaign that will lead to a different kind of participatory governance, and it is only right that this high moment be enjoyed in their presence."
July 4, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
that's good. real good.
Yunz are swinging me but I can't help but feel that it's a bit of snub to not accept at the convention - the convention that sorta made him a star to begin with.
Two speeches? Shit, he could prolly do three and pack every venue.
July 4, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, Obama shouldn't do something because of what the right wing bloggers will say? Don't you know that the right-wingers will attack him no matter what he does?
John Kerry made the mistake of allowing the republicans to run his campaign. He played by their rules. That's why he refused to allow anyone to even mention Bush's name at his convention because they had said they'd criticize him for "going negative." The convention was a flop. And he got ZERO bounce.
At the Republican convention, they skewered and ridiculed Kerry as a sport and got a 10 point bounce.
Obama needs to do what works for him, republicans be damned. If McCain can only get three dozen people at his convention, that's his problem.
July 4, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Democratic Convention in 1960 was held in the Los Angeles Sports Arena, but JFK gave his acceptance speech in the L.A. Coliseum, so this is a wonderful precedent for Obama. Go for it!
July 4, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, let's not do anything that the RW'ers will bitch about - ok, everyone assume the fetal position and stay that way until November 4th.
Nah, I don't think so.
The Republicans will bitch because they are jealous.
This is a great move.
July 4, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was hoping for this.
Can you imagine a true Obama wave in the stadium?
July 4, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love it! 76,000 fans at mile high stadium changting. It will be great TV.
July 4, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Would there be a DNC blimp?
July 4, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This would be fantastic for Democrats (and others) in Colorado, not having to watch the entire proceeding on TV. One note, though -- Mile High (renamed but never called Invesco) is only a stone's throw from the Pepsi Center, not across town. Delegates could walk there.
July 4, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually it is not across Denver... DemConWatch.com says it well:
Invesco Field at Mile High, the home of the Denver Broncos, can seat 75,000 people. It's just a short walk under I-25 from the Pepsi Center and would be a part of the rumored one-mile square radius security zone.
July 4, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
How can right wing bloggers bitch? He'll be having his speech in a FOOTBALL Stadium. You don't get more Amerrican than that!
July 4, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't buy this rumor. If they were actually planning to do this - wouldn't it be a much bigger spectacle if they surprised everyone with it? The fact that anyone knows about it makes it sound made up. Not that I wouldn't put it past them to do it. :)
July 4, 2008 1:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Try again.
July 4, 2008 1:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Vast Left Wing Conspiracy?
July 4, 2008 1:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, no, it wouldn't be better if no one knew about it ahead of time. There will be people from all over the country who will want to be there for this historic speech. Y'all remember he'll be giving it on the anniversary of Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream speech? This is a very big deal and I think that as many Americans as possible who want to be there for it should have the opportunity.
Dancing in the streets is a good thing for America. It binds us together and helps us to be even more engaged. He's encouraging us all to take ownership of our government and being engaged is the first step.
July 4, 2008 2:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, I might be one of them. I might have to make that flight and see that for myself.
July 4, 2008 3:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, that settles it for me.....I will be there, that is, if he does his acceptance speech in that stadium. I have been wishing that I could be in Denver for the convention....
Heck, it's only a thousand miles of driving, and I have relatives south of Denver.
July 4, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm...driving a thousand miles (is that one way or round trip?) to hear one man, one politician, speak. To be part of the spectacle. To be amoung the throngs. Is this not describing a cultist? ;^}
July 4, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
No.
July 4, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mmmmmyes!
July 4, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't feed the trolls.
July 4, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yooohooo, loki, yep, a thousand miles one way.....which I drive every summer anyway to visit my relatives in Colorado, with a car filled with boxes of fresh and coolers of frozen organic veggies and fruits from my place. It is nice being a grandmother who can offer that to my five grandchildren in Colorado.....and why not time that visit to be able to attend at the stadium? I also was a volunteer at Obama's announcement in Springfield, Illinois in February of 2007, so this would be like completing a circle of months of support.
Hmmm, did I mention being a grandmother in that paragraph above.......sort of as a way of, er, maybe possibly countering your knee jerk thoughtlessness about 'cult follower'.
Yeah, I'll preemptively accept your apology, should you want to offer one.
July 4, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was looking to see if anyone mentioned the anniversary before I made a comment of it.
It will be 40 years to the day of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech. The historical relevance is spiritually moving. (and I'm not talking religion)
To have so many people come to hear Obama would reflect the tremendous strides our society has made in the last 40 years. If he actually does give his speech to a larger audience it will affirm Dr. King's profound and insightful vision.
I'd give anything to be there.
July 4, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
CORRECTION:
It will be 45 years to the day of that famed speech.
July 4, 2008 9:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a great idea! Yes, I like how this man thinks too.
July 4, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just get ready for comparisons from the right to the Nuremburg Rallies...
The beauty, however, is that it will really make it look like Obama is the winner -- and people like voting for the winner.
July 4, 2008 1:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
When was the last time that the nation threw a really big celebration? I can think of big gatherings to make a point, like the million man march. And I can think of huge outpourings to grieve a loss, like JFK's funeral. But I can't think of a great big, joyful celebration since the end of WWII when we partied in the streets of New York. We could use a good party! And a much bigger one when he's elected to be the next President of the United States of America!
July 4, 2008 2:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
The BiCentennial was supposed to be a pretty big deal this time of year 32 years ago.
Presidential inaugurations are pretty gala events in recent history. I wouldn't expect Obama's to be any bigger than Reagan's or Clinton's.
And if you are talking NYC, any New Year's Eve will do.
July 4, 2008 3:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. In terms of impact on the national psyche, this is a winner. Prepare for huge post-convention bumps in the polls in Obama's favor.
July 4, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think this is a great idea. It allows more people to participate. If there was a venue that held three times that many people, it would fill too and even more people could be allowed to be involved. This is a candidate, a campaign and a presidency that is of, by and for the people. And, by the way, it would be a pretty good news punch just before the republican convention. McCain couldn't fill half that many seats if the people in them weren't actually delegates to the convention. A little dancin' in the streets is good for people after a hard fight and before the next part of the battle.
July 4, 2008 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
If we think through logistics:
The stadium is open-air.
It rains with a high degree of regularity and intensity in Denver during the summer.
Given that the convention is a major media event (essentially for the media), and given that TV producers hate unknowns and unscripted parts, like the weather, I would be willing to bet that such a spectacle is not going to happen.
July 4, 2008 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, there are few venues that are better equipped for the media to set up than Invesco, under any weather condition.
They broadcast Bronco games in December without hitches. A speech in August, even if it includes an afternoon rain shower, should not pose any problems.
July 4, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
How so? Care to provide details? It's one thing to broadcast a football game in the snow, it's another to have a major political speech -- that is pure media theatre -- in a downpour.
July 4, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
How is it different? And do you know there will be a downpour in Denver that day?
July 4, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
You miss the point: the unpredictability of the weather is the issue. This is the time of year for the monsoons in Denver, with some rather decent rains on nearly a daily basis.
So the issue isn't weather it will rain or not, but that the rain would spoil the event. These are heavily scripted events (like all "live" television) and producers don't like random elements like weather affecting things.
The weather is very different in Denver by the time football season begins in earnest.
July 4, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
CT, I understand what you're saying, and agree to some extent. There's a risk that the speech could get rained out and that could spoil the theater/
But in CO's front range in August, rainstorms tend to follow a somewhat predictable pattern of occurring between 2 PM and 6 PM. That isn't to say they always do, but it's fairly predictable that they will. I think that if the speech were held after 8 or so and the stage itself was covered, using Invesco would be worth the risk if only to allow more people to attend.
Myself, I'd like to see Obama show up unannounced at Red Rocks.
July 4, 2008 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those of you too young to remember, in 1960 JFK gave his acceptance speech outdoors in the L.A. Colisseum at the end of a convention held next door in the then new Sports Arena.
July 4, 2008 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
The weather in Denver is perfect. In late Summer it's hot and dry during the day, then it usually sprinkles for about five minutes at cocktail hour, cooling everything off. The rest of the evening is comfortable and dry. Obama could model his acceptance after the opening ceremony of the Olympic games, where a sea of fans all hold a light stick etc.
July 4, 2008 5:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Freebird!!
July 4, 2008 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
And this bird believes in change!
July 4, 2008 7:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
sounds like another great idea from the Obama campaign and I love it. I, for one, have not forgotten that he had a huge outdoor crowd in Oregon during the primaries. If this is egomania, why is the place going to be packed? Let's party! Let the whiners in the repuglican party moan and piss. Just cause no one wants to look at McSame any more than they have to...
July 4, 2008 6:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I guess that seals it. He will be doing it in the stadium. I didn't know that about kennedy. The amazing thing about the stadium is that it will be filled and then there were will be tens of thousand in the streets around the stadium. It will be huge. Good move on obama's part. Very symbolic.
July 4, 2008 7:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, portland and denver have the same population, so he drew 75k in portland w/o a convention. With the convention, look out, the place will be rocking.
July 4, 2008 7:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please note: That's 76,000 in the STANDS. With the field open to the crowd, assuming 2 square feet per standee, the crowd could top out at about 105,000.
July 4, 2008 8:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
not just for Denver but also other places he goes too.
that was one of my biggest faults with the Kerry campaign. they would stage rallies at places that only could fit 500 people or 1500 people etc leaving many people outside ticked off (including me)
Obama should use stadiums for his rallies, rain or shine. if it rains just wait for the storm to pass.
and if its in an area with bad weather definately use an arena that can house 20K people.
July 4, 2008 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Kinda like Hillary Clinton's exasperated statement:
"Enough of the speeches and the big rallies"
July 4, 2008 8:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
OOPS
This was supposed to be a reply to qasar
July 4, 2008 8:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Call me a debbie downer, but leaking this so early makes me really concerned about his safety. Secret Service better sniff that stadium out GOOD before obama sets foot on the field.
In other news, just imagining what this event would be like gives me the chills. Talk about destiny. 45th anniversary of the MLK speech. Wow...
July 4, 2008 8:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for that, Debby Downer. The Secret Service would never have thought of that if you hadn't come up with it!
July 4, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Typical flip-flop. First Obama says he's going to accept in a convention center, but now, for political expediency, he's talking about speaking in a stadium. So very Muslim of him.
July 4, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
You have a point, but perhaps the bigger meaning is this just proves how terrible HOward Dan has been for the Democratic party. Can't even get the convention venue squared away yet!
July 4, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
typos: I mean Howard Dean, above
July 4, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cute!
July 4, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with presidential conventions is that they are too expensive, they're restricted to delegates, party leaders, high-profile donors and not citizens. What a superb idea! because Barack Obama is such a unique and historic candidate, its important that all Americans get the chance to witness history.
July 4, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a lifetime Bronco fan, I would find this really, really amazing.
July 4, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
With John Elway opening, followed by Stan, Kyle, Cartman and Kenny!
July 4, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a Browns fan....
Screw John Elway!!!
July 5, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Elway's a Republican. He'll prolly run for office at some point.
July 6, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's another historical note to go with the anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech:
The last president to accept a major party nomination outdoors was John F. Kennedy. It was at the Memorial Coliseum in Los Angeles. Picture and audio can be found here http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfk1960dnc.htm
Can you imagine this being discussed and (perhaps) Obama being introduced by Caroline Kennedy? The anchors would be going wild and I think a good portion of Americans would be tearing up before he even started to speak.
July 4, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
The text of JFK's acceptance speech is also at the link and it is worth reading. It is a speech about turning the page and he uses the phrase New Frontier throughout. And he notes that no one should decide their vote based on their view of a candidate's religion. In many ways, it is an excellent model for the sort of speech Obama could give (minus the praise for the current president and the Cold War rhetoric).
July 4, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I'm the only one wondering why this warrants so much coverage. If you're at home watching this on TV, the impact of the size of venue will hardly register. People see sporting events (football) games in these stadiums every week - viewers are not focussing on the size of the crowd.
July 4, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
i think that's mostly due to the fact that weekly football games are just that...weekly football games.
obama's acceptance as the first african american nominee for president is a huge deal.
July 4, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let people bitch. The envious always do.
McCain couldn't fill the first three rows of Invesco. But our candidate? The place holds 75,000 and they'll STILL be turning people away.
The more the merrier. Excellent move.
July 4, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain could not get 76,000 people in a stadium if he was handing out free turkeys at Thanksgiving time.
I see two dangers: 1) what if the place does not sell out?
2) if the place does not sell out, a week of analysis.
But to the cons wondering "Does Obama chose a stadium to hold his whole ego?" the answer is
"No. Obama choses to do his acceptance speech in a 76,000 seat stadium BECAUSE HE CAN."
July 4, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with your concern about not filling it. Wouldn't look good. But I think they can. Filling the seats hasn't been an issue for him yet.
July 4, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good show,,,,,,,,, that is definately Senator Obama's venue.
Also, that is not only the anniversary of Dr. King's speech, it is also the 56th anniversary of the racist torture and murder of Emmet Till.
I hope some of the King family as well as the Till family can be there, up front and visible.
July 4, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
"... it is also the 56th anniversary of the racist torture and murder of Emmet Till."
Rightly or wrongly, I promise you that Obama will not use the occasion to commemorate that event. Part of his appeal has been his confronting white folks with the fact of racism without rubbing their noses in its horrors. Again, I say, rightly or wrongly. I'm convinced that a lot of his appeal, including to white Southern men, is the fact that an African American man looks them in the eye and, while not denying the facts, also does not demonize them. There's an aura of reconciliation, even forgiveness, in all he does connected with race relations. That is why I don't think he'll be commemorating "racist torture and murder" at a time of celebration when the exaltation evoked by King's speech will be the modus, not penitence.
July 4, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
gosh sounds like the crowds for american idol, oh, wait, nevermind, wrong extravaganza....
100,000 rapt, cheering, dreamily looking upon people with their hero, their manifestation of change we can be sated with orbs, it will make marvellous theatre...
this preoccupation with process and mass communication has nothing to do with any real issue, nor do i think we will get much on the issues in the acceptance speech, it will be well honed for the middle
July 4, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Get over it, PUMA.
July 4, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
lol, not to mention it would be the first time that stadium would be filled =]
July 4, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Psychologically, this can help with the "bubba" vote, as well. I mean no disrespect, but those wary, not-so educated white guys who worry about his middle name mostly *love* football. And it fights the Harvard egghead/city-slicker/not-one-of-us image.
I also think this is brilliant for all the reasons indicated above, and the critics will negate anything and you can't worry about them. They'll be drinking bitter beer in the dark on election night either way.
July 4, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Average Bubba Reagan Democrat Joe is going to switch his vote to Black crypto-Islamic fascist racist Obama because he gave a speech in a football stadium.
July 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should we regard you as an undecided voter, or do you already kinda know where you're going with this?
July 4, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be great.
Obama gives his acceptance speech in front of 75,000 people 45 years to the day after MLK's I have a dream speech.
Political symbolism at its' best.
July 4, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
B*tch at me all you want because I did support Hillary as the better candidate, but this "staging" is getting over the top. Too bad the man himself lately can't stand up for what he says he has previously. Outdoor arena like JFK...speech on the 45th anniv. of MLK... sorry but this is nothing more than symbolism overboard. And I don't care what anybody says, unless it was pre-assured and arranged that he was going to be the chosen nominee, why is his acceptance speech just happening to fall on such a special day? This was mentionned ages ago by his supporters that if he was the nominee when he would give his speech and how significant it would turn out to be. Sorry, but this whole campaign just reeks of a concerted effort to use symbolism and hyperbole and nothing but rhetoric. I still am waiting to find out who from the old guard in the Senate besides Kennedy and who hated Clinton enough to convince him to run when he said he himself wasn't qualified for the job.
And don't worry he is still better than McCain when it comes to election day and I will hold my nose but I don't have to like Obama for all his changes in pandering to get votes, especially this mushiness on withdrawing from Iraq.
July 4, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
How do you type with your hands on you hips?
July 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The key quote in this diatribe is
". . .I don't care what anybody says. . ."
July 4, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
They'll fill the stadium. And forget there will be live music. The Boss? Streisand? Prince?
July 4, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about Rage against the Machine, Outkast, U2 and Lauren Hill?
prolly no.
July 4, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Be serious. How about Willie Nelson, Aretha Franklin, and Cat Stevens?
July 4, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
That covers rural, blacks and Muslims. And Linda Ronstadt for the Latinos and Sammy Davis, Jr. for the Jews.
July 4, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Cher.
July 4, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Something else to consider with regard to Mile High.
The Denver Broncos have long been very vocal about being a GOP-friendly clubhouse. John Elway is a batshit conservative who made a big deal of skipping the Bronco's trip to the White House when Clinton was president.
For Obama to go into the House Of Elway, fill the place to the rim, and take a territorial piss there would be priceless.
July 4, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and if it's emphasized that Republican Elway is being pissed on, all of Cleveland browns' fandom will love it, and Obama wins Ohio.
SCREW JOHN ELWAY!!!!
July 5, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll come down outta the mountains to see that! Hell, I'll even ride RTD.
July 6, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to get off the nuances on abortion, guns and troop withdrawl policy. The media destroys and distorts any message that is more than a five word slogan. They will Kerry-orize him in short order.
The "hope message" brought him the nomination. Americans, by increasing numbers, are feeling hopeless and powerless in the face of fuel costs, food costs, fires and floods, foreclosures and job losses. If he can give people hope that he will fight for a Marshall Plan Presidency to begin to restore the American Dream he will not be defeated. If he allows himself to get mired in policy details that will be distorted and used against him, the contest will be framed by the GOP and McCain will win despite everything. Obama should be the vision guy. Any thinking person knows that every policy, every Bill, every plan is compromised once elected. We don't need specifics that won't matter a year from now, we need a visionary to layout a whole new broad landscape for this country.
July 5, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to get off the nuances on abortion, guns and troop withdrawl policy. The media destroys and distorts any message that is more than a five word slogan. They will Kerry-orize him in short order.
The "hope message" brought him the nomination. Americans, by increasing numbers, are feeling hopeless and powerless in the face of fuel costs, food costs, fires and floods, foreclosures and job losses. If he can give people hope that he will fight for a Marshall Plan Presidency to begin to restore the American Dream he will not be defeated. If he allows himself to get mired in policy details that will be distorted and used against him, the contest will be framed by the GOP and McCain will win despite everything. Obama should be the vision guy. Any thinking person knows that every policy, every Bill, every plan is compromised once elected. We don't need specifics that won't matter a year from now, we need a visionary to layout a whole new broad landscape for this country.
July 5, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too bad Leni Riefenstahl isn't available for the documentary.
July 6, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink