« McCain Again Refers To Czechoslovakia, A Non-Existent Country | Home | Obama Decision On Brandenburg Gate Speech Is Imminent »

Poll: Obama Has Narrow Lead In Swing State Of Colorado

A new survey of Colorado by Public Policy Polling (D) shows Barack obama with a narrow lead in this swing state, which has been trending from red to blue very quickly in the last few years.

The numbers: Obama 47%, McCain 43%, with a margin of error of ±3%. Other recent polls have also shown Obama with a narrow lead in this state.

In this poll, McCain has a 46%-45% lead among white voters, but Obama dominates 58%-34% with Hispanics, a demographic where some had doubted he'd do well. The key to watch for in Colorado will be what percentage of the state's voters will be Hispanics. "The higher that number is, the more likely it will be that Barack Obama is victorious," the pollster concludes.

Also, some good news for Dems in the Senate race: Democratic candidate Mark Udall leads Republican Bob Schaffer by a 47%-39% margin, in the race for this open GOP-held seat.


17 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

As long as Obama keeps the lead here, in Iowa, New Mexico, and all the Kerry states, fear not the tightening of the National polls.

Yesterday it was Missouri, today Michigan and Colorado. It seems like the polls are bouncing all around of late, but today they are bouncing in our direction. Here's hoping that by November they will have settled down some in our favor.

Good thing we have Rasmussen's daily tracking numbers to remind us that this information is meaningless - provided they're close, that is.

i don't get it newsweek has obama up by only 3 but he still lead in swing states.........

If you alos look at some other polls, like Zogby which includes Barr and other candidates, Obama is ahead in

Arizona, Colorado, North Carolina, South Carolina, Montana, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio,Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

It is also close in other North Dakota, Nevada, Tenessee and Mississipi where Barr is taking votes from McSameBush...


user-pic

Speaking of Mr. Barr -- Is there a web site out there that lists the states where he will be on the ballot in November?

Would love to, ahem, help him get on the ballot, as the GOP was so kind to do with Mr. Nader in 2004. >:-)

user-pic
but Obama dominates 58%-34% with Hispanics, a demographic where some had doubted he'd do well.

But, but, NPR told me this morning that Obama might have a problem with Hispanics!

And just last week, Cokie Roberts told me Obama would have a problem with Hispanics because, you know, he lost them in the primaries

Is it just me, or is this just plain inane?

It is inane.

The media, with increased competiton from the Internet tries to be analytical, and is groping for ways to be relevant and stand out.
On NPR, they realize that most of their listeners lean left, so they keep this type of false suspense up so you'll be sure to tune in to hear Cokie tomorrow for "late-breaking developments!"

Not only is it inane, it's pathetic.

Echoing the other posts on the meaninglessness of national polls in Presidential elections.
What we actually have is 50 elections for President going on at the same time.
But the media and the pollsters are always enamored with "the pulse of the nation," hence the plethora of national polls and tracking polls.

Can you hear me now? Obama's missing 2 percent

By failing to survey cellphone-only voters, pollsters could be undercounting Barack Obama's support by millions of voters.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/07/14/cell_phone/?source=newsletter

user-pic

That is dubious--so far there has been no evidence that poll data lacking cellphone-only users is skewed. In fact, quality pollsters make sure the demographics most likely to be represented by cellphone-only users are accurately sampled in their surveys.

Correct. However, all young people who use land-lines instead of cell phones are republicans.

user-pic

The key is "quality", is it not?

From the piece:

By law, cellphone users cannot be called by an automatic dialing system (to prevent obnoxious telemarketing), and cellphone numbers are not part of the normal random-digit-dialing residential-exchange universe. Survey companies prefer to conduct polls using automatic dialing, but to find cellphone-only voters, they must employ the less-efficient hand-dialing method. Cellphone users must be sampled separately and at greater cost in time and money. This means that polls utilizing the cheaper and more efficient means of making survey calls do not include cellphone interviews.

And as survey respondents, these voters are less cooperative anyway. Even if they are contacted, they are less likely to take a call, or to arrange a call-back, than land-line households -- further increasing the cost of reaching them.

Many survey companies have looked at these impediments and decided that it is simply not worth the extra effort and cost to track down cellphone users. (I am not going to name names, but one should assume that polls conducted by robo-calls undercount cellphone-only voters.)

Hmmmmm. Which companies conduct polls using robo-calls?

This is good news for us today. Unless things go terribly wrong, Obama will carry Colorado, but it should stay close all the way to the end.

John McCain Opposed Health Insurance For Children

With Colorado having that whack job of a vote on a fertilized egg being a life and basically making IUD's illegal, etc., I hope the Dems will be out in force to vote no.

That wasn't recently was it? We have a Dem governor now, thankfully. The state is definitely trending democratic as Boulder politics are finally making inroads into Denver.

Obama will carry Colorado and easily carry New Mexico.

the only question is will he carry nevada? i think he can.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address