Pentagon Confirms That It Told Obama He Couldn't Visit Army Base With Campaign Staff
I've just gotten clarification from the Pentagon on what really happened with regard to Barack Obama's canceled visit to an Army base in Germany, something the McCain campaign has been using to hit Obama since yesterday.
A Pentagon spokesperson confirms to me that because of longstanding Department of Defense regulations, Pentagon officials told Obama aides that he couldn't visit the base with campaign staff. This left Obama with little choice but to cancel the trip, since the plan to visit with campaign aides had been in the works for weeks.
The Obama campaign yesterday announced that it had decided to cancel the visit to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, saying that it would be "inappropriate" to make such a visit as part of a campaign trip.
The McCain camp has nonetheless been using Obama's canceled trip to insinuate that he's anti-troops. "Barack Obama is wrong," McCain spokesperson Brian Rogers said in a statement yesterday. "It is never 'inappropriate' to visit our men and women in the military."
But it turns out that the Pentagon did in fact tell Obama that in this case, it was not only "inappropriate," but against DOD rules, for him to conduct the visit with campaign staff.
"We have longstanding Department of Defense policy in regards to political campaigns and elections," Pentagon spokesperson Elizabeth Hibner told me. "We informed the Obama staff that he was more than welcome to visit as Senator Obama, with Senate staff. However, he could not conduct the visit with campaign staff."
After being told this, the Obama campaign announced yesterday that it had decided it was "inappropriate" to make the visit as part of a campaign trip.
It's unclear how Obama could have made the visit at all, given the Pentagon's directives. No Senate staff was on the trip, and the Obama camp says they received the Pentagon's directives on Wednesday, after they were already abroad.
Bottom line: We're not seeing any issue here at all.
Late Update: In fairness, the Obama campaign's first statement should have been clearer about what happened, but the larger point is that the McCain campaign criticism appears unfounded.















What about McCain's cancelled speech on the oil rig? The one in the Gulf off LA that had to be cancelled because of an OIL SPILL.
Now that's a cancelled appointment with some relevance.
July 25, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/23/152437/064/496/555797
July 25, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're right, actually: the oil spill fits in perfectly with Obama's opposition to off-shore drilling.
July 25, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah its kind of ironic
see obama in france live online here http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/watch-obama-with-president-nicolas-sarkozy-live/
July 25, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, and apparently the good American public isn't buying all this drilling to lower gas prices nonsense anyways (good article on Dkos right now).
Dkos link:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/25/1201/30587/750/556584
From the Widlerness Society:
"A significant majority of Americans (63%) said that the President's proposal to open up public lands to oil and gas drilling is "more likely to enrich oil companies than to lower gas prices for American consumers." A substantial majority (66%) said that "the small percentage of public lands still protected from oil drilling should remain off limits because they are valuable natural resources that cannot be replaced."
July 25, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The issue is it reinforces both ways barack and the dishonesty of what he says:
1) The campaign said the berlin speech was not obama campaigning but him as a citizen. on the other hand, a visit to the military would be campaigning, not as a citizen or senator.
2) The campaign statement misrepresents what the DoD told them. It is a major misrepresentation because it tries to make it out that they had no choice, but they did.
3) if obama really wanted to visit, he could have.
people who think this is "no issue" have to be a little more honest with themselves.
July 25, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
You didn't just say that an oil spill helps Obama...did you?
July 25, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope, but YOU sure implied it.
July 25, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Offshore drilling- what a great answer for our energy future:
"Oil from the spill is visible along the New Orleans riverfront, with a thick coat of black muck washing up along the rocks near the Moonwalk. Farther away from the bank, the muck broke off into small islands.
A thick blanket of oil stuck to the hull of a Coast Guard cutter patrolling the area between the wrecked barge and the riverfront near the Aquarium of the Americas. The surrounding air there smells like it would near a gas station or in a traffic jam, only stronger."
From:
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/07/ap_collision_closes_mississipp.html
July 25, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
...of course this spill has nothing to do with offshore drilling but hey...why let facts get in the way.
July 25, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really? "Nothing to do" with offshore drilling? Where was the oil in the tanker from? Is that clear?
July 25, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has EVERYTHING to do with OIL, though. Doesn't it?
July 25, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
from rttnews.com:
"Oil prices reversed course and moved higher Thursday in U.S. trading after a move in Congress to tap into the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve was defeated. ... At a press conference before the vote, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, pointed out that previous releases from the oil reserve had knocked down prices, sometimes significantly: 33 percent in 1991, 19 percent in 2000 and nine percent in 2005"
Thanks, Republicans, for defeating the bill. Thanks for sticking up for the oil companies and NOT the American republic.
Shouldn't you change your party name to the Corporatist Party?
July 25, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's campaign, of course, comes off as ridiculous.
July 25, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
A politician without staff is like peanut butter without jelly (or McCain without a geography gaffe of the day).
July 25, 2008 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg - there is no issue here, there is no issue there, there hasn't been one damn issue raised by McLame yet.
They are making shit up as fast as they can and none of it means one damn thing.
This may be the weirdest campaign season evah.
July 25, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. There is absolutely no issue here at all. McCain is grasping at straws...if he brings it up again then this article can easily swat that down.
July 25, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
no issue?
obama never takes responsibility for decisions. always blaming it on others, his surrogates, his staff.
in this case, he blames DoD by misrepresenting what they told his campaign. dont u think if he really wanted to go he would have found a way?
July 25, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Certainly no issue whatsoever here. But what about that "surge" thing? Better bring that one up again, since McCain is running as President of the Surge. I can't find much else of substance in his positions.
July 25, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain already got his play with this issue. Why didn't the Obama camp give this reasoning yesterday? Did they not want to make it an issue with the Pentagon, but had to do so when McCain decided to make it an issue?
Hagel and Reed we're gone after the ME portion of the trip, but I assume he could have went by himself.
July 25, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's staff not on their game on this one. All staffers should have just parked themselves outside of the base along with the reporters. Obama could have had a private (respectful) visit with wounded soldiers.
McCain's spinners would have nothing to distract people with (and Dems wouldn't be wasting a day trying to get the correct story out there).
July 25, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was all a trap and Mccain fell right into it. If Obama's campaign had said the visit wasn't allowable under DOD rules the story would've died there. Instead Mccain went on offense and tried to score some points and now Obama gets to counter with "Mccain turned our following of military rules into a political attack"
July 25, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
He still could've gone...just not made it a "campaign" event...no photo op...just a citizen of the world thanking other citizens of the world.
July 25, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, SFC, we all know that when it comes to you and Obama, he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.
You want to schedule that walk on water for you for later? Or will that not be enough, either?
July 25, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not true, he's only damned when he messes up, and I think he stepped in it here. If he's gonna error when it comes to the perception of his support of the troops it should be in the other direction.
July 25, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah I know - and whether or not Obama messed up is a matter of perspective, right?
'
So you get to say anytime you think he's messed up. Even when he hasn't. Because of your "perspective" - No?
Go back to LGF. That's where all of you originate.
July 25, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I originated in one of the most liberal counties in the country (Sonoma CA)so I'm used to liberals trying to shout me down just because they don't agree. Free speech (well if you agree with us anyway otherwise shut up) is your hallmark.
July 25, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually it is the other way around, Wallace. Right-wingers are always the first to deny Constitutional rights. See "Gitmo" for one example of many.
July 25, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, republicans are reeling..
July 25, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama was not travelling in Germany with his Senatorial staff. He is not a private citizen who can just hop in a cab and head over to the base, but a presidential candidate with organizational and security concerns. Your suggestion that he could have gone alone is just stupid. There is no issue here.
July 25, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
And yet none of your self-justification makes you any less of an asshat.
Your Dear Leader has been on one long campaign event for the last eight years. Fortunately, that shit's about to end.
July 25, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha, free speech! You're still allowed to post here aren't you? RedState on the other hand just banned me for linking to this article.
July 25, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
How does McCain opposition to the GI Bill and that not even showing up to vote on it measure his support for the troops?
What about all McCain's votes against more money for veterans and veteran's hospitals show McCain's support for the troops.
Quite simply McCain doesn't care if it involves any cost at all.
No cost, no measure is small enough for McCain and his support of the troops.
July 25, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Idiot...If you recall...he was on a codel in Afghanistan and Iraq, with his Senate staff...His campaign staff was on the Obama plane. After the Iraq codel with Reed, and Hagel. He switched planes and staff as Senate staffers fall under the Hatch Act.
Now we find ourselves on Wednesday (the idiots in the Pentagon sat on the decision for a week before informing Obama), and he has only campaign operatives, a speech to give and other concerns.
The best turn on a dime move is to say that it is inappropriate.
I guess with your logic, he should have shown the DOD a permissions slip from Ace McCain saying its OK.
But it was'nt.
OK? LIFER? Why do'nt you get some wurst to go with your whine.
July 25, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't waste your time on someone who's probably spent the better part of his military career staring down the business end of a stapler.
July 25, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why do you use Lifer as a pejorative?
July 25, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he figures you're just a full-of-shit chickenhawk who likes macho avatars?
July 25, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lifer, is what you think it is. If you think it is a perjorative, it is. If you are proud of it; then it is something to be proud of. I know and have known many honorable lifers in my time.
The question, is in your own mind.
July 25, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's an event even if cameras aren't there.
July 25, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
He had no Senate staff with him. No Senator goes anywhere, especially overseas, without their staff to coordinate and act as a liaison.
The issue here is someone within the DoD apparently withheld this information to the campaign until well after all arrangements had been made.
I'm curious to see if anyone does the legwork to see how strenuously this apparent regulation has been upheld prior to Obama's trip.
July 25, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I'm curious to see if anyone does the legwork to see how strenuously this apparent regulation has been upheld prior to Obama's trip."
That assumes we have a MSM that is interested in getting to the bottom of government deceit / trickery/ policital machinations.
July 25, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you read the article that Greg linked to, no one made a "ruling" or "forbade" the visit. "Concerns" were raised, about the visit being a campaign event.
July 25, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I said nothing about a "ruling" or about Obama being overtly forbidden from actually visiting Landstuhl. However, from the article:
[blockquote]...the Obama campaign received official permission two weeks ago from the Pentagon to land a plane in Ramstein, Germany. But on Wednesday, he said, military officials advised the campaign of concerns about a political visit being a violation of government rules.[/blockquote]
This sure sounds like someone is referring to "rules". So, basically plans were made and confirmed through the Pentagon by the Obama campaign to visit US soldier serving overseas, and then after the first portion of the visit went so well, "concerns" were brought forward. This was also after visiting troops in Iraq and Jordan.
Very curious, to say the least. But I'm sure not political in the least
July 25, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, I'm a mess this afternoon. I should just get back to work :)
What I meant was:
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I said nothing about a "ruling" or about Obama being overtly forbidden from actually visiting Landstuhl. However, from the article:
This sure sounds like someone is referring to "rules". So, basically plans were made and confirmed through the Pentagon by the Obama campaign to visit US soldier serving overseas, and then after the first portion of the visit went so well, "concerns" were brought forward. This was also after visiting troops in Iraq and Jordan.
Very curious, to say the least. But I'm sure not political in the least
July 25, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you're saying Obama should have risked it? And you wouldn't have criticized it? Sure thing. You and the rest of the McHacks are just pathetic...
July 25, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
What, are you teh offspring of EastWest and rstephen?
Guess you missed this part:
"A Pentagon spokesperson confirms to me that because of longstanding Department of Defense regulations, Pentagon officials told Obama aides that he couldn't visit the base with campaign staff. This left Obama with little choice but to cancel the trip, since the plan to visit with campaign aides had been in the works for weeks."
I hope your MOS doesn't involve anything complex like reading and understanding plain English.
July 25, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aren't those of the isolationist right (I know, redundant) just adorable. Heaven forfend that we could have a president that actually believes in working with allies and utilizing diplomacy. I guess for the right to have been happy Obama should've pulled a Bush and given the german crowd the finger -- preferably from a ranch somewhere in Texas.
July 25, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oooh, that's some ugly desperation... you just can't get over the fact that McLiar is peddling bullshit because his campaign is sinking like a rock.
July 25, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
tell that to the 200 journalists who wanted to travel with him. somehow i doubt he would have been able to take this trip WITHOUT IT BEING COVERED.
July 25, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only actual issue, as you've pointed out, is whether they actively screwed Obama by not responding to his plans for a visit until it was too late to change them. I think the campaign accurately perceived that even if that were true, arguing it would distract from the purposes of the trip, so they put the best face possible on it.
July 25, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Sen. Obama is welcome to visit Landstuhl or any military hospital in his official capacity as a United States senator," Morrell said in a brief interview. "But there is a DoD policy which governs campaigning and electioneering at military facilities that would have to be respected if he were to visit. That distinction was relayed and made clear to campaign, and they made a decision on their own based on that guidance."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0708/DoD_spokesman_says_Obama_camp_was_reminded_of_political_rules.html
July 25, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
A lot of parsing there.
Are you sure you were not part of the Clinton Adminstration?
July 25, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
This doesn't answer the issue of selective enforcement. Why was Obama's visit in conflict with this regulation, but McCain's visits to military bases are OK?
July 25, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't sound like it was, it looks like he was told not to let it become a campaign event and he balked.
July 25, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, here's a thought. Why don't you try doing some work at your work computer for a change?
July 25, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the rest of the quote, including what you ellided: “Senator Obama, in his official capacity, is always welcome to visit Landstuhl or any other military hospital. But it is not permitted to bring with him campaign staff. His team was notified of that, and they made a decision not to visit the hospital. But we were ready and willing to host him there. In fact, we had made arrangements for his campaign plane to land at Ramstein, and to take care of the campaign staff and press in a passenger terminal there, while the senator and senate staff, if he liked, went on to visit wounded warriors. They made a decision based on their own calculations not to visit. Senator Obama, like any other member of the senate, is always welcome to visit our wounded warriors or our military hospitals around the world. But they do so in their official capacity, and not as a candidate. He can come in and bring senate staffers as well, if he likes, but campaign staffers and press are not permitted to accompany him. That would be a violation of DoD directives.”
How nice of them to offer to "make arrangements" for the campaign staff and reporters to cool their heels while Obama made the rounds, "if he likes".
One of those "you can't do this, but, hey, you decide" deals.
July 25, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. "Come on over, and your people can spend a few hours in the hangar" doesn't exactly sound like a "you're welcome to visit" to me. As for all those folks saying "Obama should have just gone on his own," I wonder how many of them can think through the entire scenario. It's not as though the staff, reporters, pilot and flight crew, etc. just disappear because Obama decides to do something else. The trip was tightly scheduled, and this stop had been part of the plan. For the DOD to suddenly say that no one but Obama (and, in theory, his Senate staff) could come inside meant that everyone else was stuck waiting on the plane or in the hangar.
Now, as much as Obama might have wanted to visit the troops, I can also understand that 1) the event was already "politicized" and he didn't want to push it any further, and 2) he wasn't going to ask all the other folks traveling with him to cool it on the runway for a few hours while he ditched them. It's not about a "photo op." It was the only realistic choice, given the last minute logistical block.
July 28, 2008 4:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. The issue is that they didn't tell him until the last minute.
July 25, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
More information from Politico:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0708/Obama_camp_says_Pentagon_nixed_troop_visit.html?showall
"My colleague Carrie Budoff Brown, traveling with Obama, sends over more information from a briefing ofered by Gibbs:
Senior strategist Robert Gibbs said the visit to the military hospital in Germany had been in the works for about three weeks, with Gration serving as the campaign's contact with the Pentagon.
The Pentagon cleared the Obama plan to land at the base on either July 15 or 16, Gibbs said. The plane needed the clearance because of restrictions on landing nonmilitary aircraft there, he said.
But then on Wednesday, Gration told Obama aides that the Pentagon had informed him that the visit could be viewed as a campaign stop.
"They cited a regulation," Gibbs said of their point of contact, described as legislative affairs in the office of the secretary.
"We believed that based on the information we received that any presence, even his own and only his own, would get into a back and forth on whether his own presence was a campaign event," Gibbs said.
Obama decided on the flight Wednesday from Tel Aviv to Berlin not to visit the hospital.
Asked why he believed the Pentagon would clear the visit, then raised questions about it, Gibbs declined to speculate: "I don't know what to make of it."
Asked whether he thought the Pentagon set up the campaign for a political embarrassment, Gibbs said no."
July 25, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is just like the state dept rulings...playing games and trying screw Obama. Not issuing this ruling in timely manner was on purpose!
damn..it would be so nice for our gov't to stop with this shit!
July 25, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I smell Rovian tactics and some cooperation with Mccain. If this comes out no doubt the MSM will bury it and focus on the audacity of Obama munching on a crossaint with Sarkosy...just damn UnAmerican!
July 25, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't matter that it's not a real issue - the McCain campaign has made it an issue. Obama didn't respond quickly enough, and he didn't respond aggressively enough, with an invitation to compare his support for the troops to McCain's. Once again, the Democrats are going to "nice guy" their way to a loss in November if they don't learn how to play this game.
July 25, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
O please.
Obama just made a speech in Berlin that the whole world was listening to.
Your concern is totally baseless.
July 25, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
The more McCain decides to make this an issue, the more it'll come out just what kind of backroom games are being played by the DoD to help the Republican candidate. The more people, especially independents realize how political Republicans have turn supposedly non-partisan segments of the federal government, the less likely they'll want another Republican back in the reigns of the White House.
I don't think he'll push this "attack" too much farther.
Besides, how much more aggressively did you want Obama to respond? Did you want him to take steps to actively embarrass the entire DoD when this was clearly the work of some politically appointed stooge within?
July 25, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
If I were McLame, I'd want people to forget that speech and this entire trip as quickly as possible.
Obama just became president this last week. He morphed right into The President, and everybody can see it, and I bet McLame can see it.
July 25, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
"He morphed right into The President, and everybody can see it..." You really need to come up for air some time. It was a nice speech but "hail to the chief" isn't playing everytime he walks down the stairs quite yet. I'm still trying to figure out why your "messiah" is scared of debating the "feeble old man." Maybe he realizes he's all show and no go.
July 25, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure you'll be the first to be grousing come 1/20/09 about your "so-called" C in C. Just like the Clinton years.
Not that you're partisan or anything...
July 25, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
More GOP trickery.
McCain should issue an apology or declare the DOD rules wrong. Which is it?
July 25, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama cannot attack from abroad. McCain has had a free pass all week, while slinging mud across the Atlantic whenever he or his campaign felt like it.
July 25, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, typical coward, typical repug. Hit your opponent below the belt when his hands are tied.
July 25, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just how disconnected is this with to the State department prohibition of Berlin embassy staff attending his speech? There does appear to be a coordinated pettiness campaign going on by the Republican-controlled bureaucracy.
Such stringent rules seem to no longer matter when Lorita Doan shows up with her government politicizing agenda.
July 25, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope you're right, HusseinTenaX. He's doing all of the right positive things, but I don't think he was prepared for how crazy the Republicans are. John Kerry and Al Gore were very impressive, high-minded, polite candidates, too. They underestimated the determination of their opponents and overestimated the level of distate the voting public would surely show for dirty campaign tactics. Obama's going to have to do better than saying he's "disappointed" in the McCain camp's antics this past week.
July 25, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
If there were emoticons on this site, I would post one laying on it's back, unconscious.
My own eyes are crossed.
Are you seriously going to do this through another freaking campaign, Jersey?
I've heard it - I could fucking recite it for you.
July 25, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jersey Tomato may be a little bleak, but the points are relavent. The GOP is not going to let this election go easily, despite McCain being a lousy candidate. Won't do any good to complain about having a better candidate and favorable polls after the election get stolen by GOP tricksters, yet again.
I saw a post today about the need for attorneys for post-election voter fraud cases - forget that - we should make sure every Dem voter is registered well in advance, has the appropriate ID, knows their polling place and how to use the voting machines.
July 25, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but Rove and the gang; have'nt met a candidate with an intellect, till now. They are exposing themselves (degenerate pols)for what they are.
July 25, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
at this point, it looks like the McCain camp doesn't care if their criticism is founded or not.
If Obama had met with the soldiers, i'm sure McCain would have hit him for "exploiting" or "hiding behind" our men and women in uniform for political gain...
July 25, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
And the jerks at ABCNEWS.COM ran a top line story all afternoon and evening accusing Obama of "nixing" the troops. So much for "Love."
July 25, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
There never was "Love," there was scrutiny. McCain can thank his lucky stars he hasn't received any.
http://strategy08.wordpress.com
July 25, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am not sure the DOD rule is wrong. I do think they should have been up front earlier. Senators visit troops in hospital all the time. With a little advance warning the Obama campaign could have brought senate staffers over to coordinate the visit.
A really serious journalist would investigate if the DOD's regulation has been as closely enforced against McCain, Lieberman or one of the other thugs.
July 25, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
SFC, I suppose Obama could have just walked out of his hotel, hailed a cab and then walked into the base.
July 25, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, whatever... Obama started this week with nothing but glowing reviews, and it was clear McCain was playing catch up. Now we're hearing about his arrogance, about how he's out of touch with the American people, and how he's ignoring the troops, and I haven't heard a sufficient comeback form the Obama campaign. I know it's early, I know a lot can happen, but I haven't seen that Obama has the stomach for the sort of fight the Republicans are going to wage. I'll happily say I'm wrong if Obama is sworn in next January. But yes, I am going to worry through the whole campaign. Ignore me at your pleasure.
July 25, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, the RNC still has an article on their blog attacking Obaama on this, saying he'd rather be working out that meeting with troops.
Maybe they should remove it. But, ya know, why would facts get in the way of a good attack?
http://www.gop.com/Blog/Read.aspx?GUID=67473d13-67b4-4f44-b5bd-fb9a04236a5e
July 25, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I said nothing about a "ruling" or about Obama being overtly forbidden from actually visiting Landstuhl. However, from the article:
[blockquote]...the Obama campaign received official permission two weeks ago from the Pentagon to land a plane in Ramstein, Germany. But on Wednesday, he said, military officials advised the campaign of concerns about a political visit being a violation of government rules.[/blockquote]
This sure sounds like someone is referring to "rules". So, basically plans were made and confirmed through the Pentagon by the Obama campaign to visit US soldier serving overseas, and then after the first portion of the visit went so well, "concerns" were brought forward. This was also after visiting troops in Iraq and Jordan.
Very curious, to say the least. But I'm sure not political in the least.
July 25, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Meh...this should have been posted upthread. Ignore it please.
July 25, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's swiftboating all over again. Except in this case, it's our own Army that's being complicit.
Who needs NPOs to do your dirty work with a seated CINC who is uninterested in regime change in his own country?
July 25, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
With this line of attack, it is Janus McCain that is using the wounded troops in his political campaign. Shame on Janus McCain for his cynical use of our wounded soldiers in order to lie about Senator Obama's honorable decision not to use those wounded troops as a campaign prop.
Janus McCain hates the wounded vets, and that is why he voted against the new GI benefits bill.
July 25, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well maybe the Pentagon thought Hagel and Reed would be with Obama. The ME portion of the trip was official visits as Senators, however Hagel and Reed flew home when Obama headed to Europe as that isn't official business anymore, but campaign related.
So the Pentagon could have assumed that Obama would have went to Landstuhl on the official leg, along with Hagel and Reed.
July 25, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm really really sorry, Jonze. But, twice in one day... "Would have went???"
July 25, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
What am I missing/Where am I mistaken? Something factual or grammatical?
July 25, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The correct phrase should be "would have gone."
July 25, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't suppose any of you sycophants will entertain the notion that Obama might have decided on his own that visiting wounded soldiers wasn't appropriate as a campaign event? Absent any rulings or chicanery, Obama would have been perfectly happy to exploit the visit for his campaign. But instead let's focus on how everyone's trying to undermine him and conspire against him. Because we know Obama's motives are always pure.
July 25, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Other than you, I see no one here who has asserted that Obama's motives are always pure.
The tone and tenor of your posts make YOU sound like a disgruntled PUMA Hillary supporter, or worse yet, a Grampy McSame troll.
July 25, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"So where does McCain stand on legislation supported by major veterans organizations?
On Webb's GI Bill, he expressed opposition, and he was AWOL when it was time to vote on May 22.
In September, he voted against another Webb bill that would have mandated adequate rest for troops between combat deployments.
On a badly needed $1.5-billion increase for veterans medical services for fiscal year 2007 — to be funded through closing corporate tax loopholes — he voted no. He also voted against establishing a trust fund to bolster under-budgeted veterans hospitals.
In May 2006, he voted against a $20-billion allotment for expanding swamped veterans medical facilities.
In April 2006, he was one of 13 Senate Republicans who voted against an amendment to provide $430 million for veterans outpatient care.
In March 2004, he voted against and helped defeat on a party-line vote a $1.8-billion reserve for veterans medical care, also funded by closing tax loopholes.
Before the Senate voted on Webb's GI legislation, McCain offered what he called a compromise bill, but it was rejected. Webb pointed out that there really was no compromise in McCain's proposal because it would have excluded most veterans by offering full education benefits only to those with multiple enlistments, even though 70 percent to 75 percent of enlistees leave after one tour.
Compare McCain's stingy standards with the original GI Bill: It paid for 12 months of college or vocational school if a veteran served 90 days, with additional benefits, up to 48 months of school, for each month of military service. It is Webb's bill that represents the reasonable compromise between the gold standard set for the "greatest generation's" original GI benefits and what is doable in today's economy: a GI Bill that will truly pay for a college education after three years of service, without the onerous payroll deduction.
So here is where the McCain image and reality part company. It is certainly true that his affectionate and respectful rhetoric for America's servicemen and women takes a back seat to no one. But when it comes to improving the health and education of our veterans, McCain's record leaves them stranded by the side of the road."
Edward Humes, author of "Over Here: How the GI Bill Transformed the American Dream"
http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/06/03/0604humes_edit.html
July 25, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarkozy's cell phone goes off... Oh god, he's such a joke. I'm so glad I know French fluently. This is great.
July 25, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was meant to be in reply to coba11 near the top.
July 25, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama can't EVEN PRAY!!
They published his prayer, they stole his pray, his words to God..should be sacred....but they PUBLISHED it!!!
Unbelievable. Nothing is sacred.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/photos/0/087a0ae4-19b7-489c-8b99-2fc82df93a90.html?SITE=TXKER&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
This is an outrage!!
How can someone steal a man's prayer? His words to God? From the holiest site ...sad, sad
July 25, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
What graceless fuckers...Isn't anything sacrosanct anymore to the whores in the press ?
July 25, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should run with this:
""Barack Obama is wrong," McCain spokesperson Brian Rogers said in a statement yesterday. "It is never 'inappropriate' to visit our men and women in the military.""
He should pounce, and use this statement to illuminate the fact that Republicans don't care about rules, and that they will politicize anything. It would be "inappropriate" and McCain's not knowing that, or not caring, is how we ended up with the DOJ crisis, and more.
July 25, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chris O you mean like he visited wounded in iraq and at Walter Reed with all those cameras...o wait nevermind thats right he visited without the press. But because the Republican BS machine got fired up you decided to play Pavlov? Praytell from what hole do you oxygen thiefs originate from?
July 25, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg, I am going to sound stupid, but why couldn't Obama visit without campaign staff, just himself, Hagel, and Reed? I mean even after the Army said no dice to campaign staff. They could be visiting as a Congressmen, no?
July 25, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hagel and Reed had already left.
July 25, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hagel, Reed, and his senate staff had already returned to the US; via military transport. He had pre-cleared the trip (to Landstuhl) 12 days earlier with the military. They informed him of the staff requirement on Wednesday the day before he was to visit Landstuhl.
My question is why did the Pentagon wait till 24 hrs. before his meeting? Why did Condi, limit assistance for Pres. Candidates 24 hrs. prior to the trip? Why did the Ambassador to Germany restrict attendance to the speech (for all State Dept. Employees)the day before the event? And why did the White House allow the Canadian Ambassador to help McCain organize a meeting for Ace McCain, when he gave a speech in Canada?
July 25, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/25/state-obama-speech/
July 25, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
see above lind about Canada Ace getting help from ambassador.
July 25, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a lame excuse! Can't he go see the troops without his staff to hold his hand? Tell them to go get a cup of coffee. Take a little time out of your schedule for the troops. Does he tell his staff what to do or does his staff tell him what to do? Does the phrase grow a pair mean anything?
It just shows you one major flaw Obama has. He is a coward! He is probably afraid of the reception he would get from the soldiers. And if he was worried about it looking like a campaign event. DON'T LET THE PRESS COME WITH YOU!
When will the Obama robots see this phony for what he is? He is nothing but canned speeches about hope and change. He wouldn't know an original idea if jumped up and bit him on the rear. He is afraid to go on Fox News Sunday because they might ask him a tough question. He is afraid to debate McCain in an open town debate. He is afraid to admit the bravery, sacrifice, courage and performance of our troops during the surge is what made it work. And he is afraid to admit he was wrong about the surge all along. He is afraid to do anything that is not carefully scripted.
July 25, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Surprise, surprise a first post drive-by.
July 25, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can you please name an issue McCain is on the American people's side with? Since 2000, because he's totally sold himself out since then and become an intirely different politician (namely McBush). I'd be really curious. Seems to me McCain doesn't have any legs to stand on.
I would call a coward someone who knows what is right and then refuses to do it. Kind of like being a POW and veteran and then refusing to support them when you have a position of power (see post upthread).
July 25, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the reception he got from the soldiers he did see was as a rockstar.
I don't see any reason he'd fear seeing wounded soldiers. Did he send them to a pointless war? Did he keep the VA weak, did he insure the wounded came back to little care and support? Did he support a surge that lacked a plan to reach political stability in Iraq so we can get the hell out?
July 25, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe its difficult to put this into a political message that resonnates but on all this surge stuff what was the evidence Mccain had this prescience when the admin was firing Generals for having the audacity to say we need more troops? If any of these Generals had been granted that request would General P now be the Pavlov word for all Republicans to enter the dry hump cycle? Is there any proof the "Maverick" stood alone on that rebel hill when this went down? I will give anyone a six of Hoegarden if you can find it because I cant find a shred of evidence Mccain stood up for these Generals or better tactics at the beginning of this mess when it may made a difference and saved thousands of our troops and Iraqi's lifes...
July 25, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to MSNBC First Read, Obama has phoned the wounded troops in Germany.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/25/1222409.aspx
"From NBC's Jim Miklaszewski
Obama made phone calls to wounded soldiers at Landstuhl Germany this morning, in lieu of a personal visit to the forces that was canceled by the Obama campaign.
Obama was expected to speak to a number of soldiers individually."
July 25, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama DID get a bounce from trip:
Gallup: Obama 47 McCain 41
Rasmussen: Obama 49 McCain 44
July 25, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama DID get a bounce from trip:
Gallup: Obama 47 McCain 41
Rasmussen: Obama 49 McCain 44
July 25, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dont doubt for a minute this is a deliberate cooeprative effort by the admin and Mccain to play politics with the troops. Absolutely shameless, they just do not care one iota for what the troops want. Remember this is the same Pentagon that tried to twist Maliki's Iraq concurrence. If anyone wanted yet another reason to donate to Obama and work as hard as we can to get him elected you can toss this on the pile. Using the military as a political tool to shape message and play set up man to allow the oxygen thief outrage machine to spew out BS to low info voters and yet again make this an election based on superfluous sewage when this country desperately needs a leader not another dyed in the wool sell out that blows air into his Rove inflatable doll nightly.
July 25, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
When you hear Republicans screech and whine loudly over something, realize that that's all they have.
Is it over an item that must be spun, must have the actual details obfuscated? Realize that that's all they have to use.
Obama was presidential as hell on this trip. The Republicans got nothing of substance from it to use against him.
July 25, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jessran,
There is no doubt in my mind that the Pentagon was trying to sabotage Obama at the last minute.
Any ways, Obama has called wounded troops and I am glad.
July 25, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just can't let it go, eh mertmag? Obama has said many, many times that the soldiers have done an excellent job. You're either lying or ignorant, not a good choice. And as The Daily Show observed this week, "there are a lot of brothers in the military." Sen. Obama isn't afraid of them...but maybe you're afraid of the truth.
Also, be careful what you wish for. The debates will be here soon enough. I never thought McCain was all that solid in a debate; I think Bush whipped his ass in 2000.
July 25, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Pentagon did Obama a favor. What if this had been caught after the visit. I think that in turn, the Obama campaign gave a vague reason for skipping the visit. It was inappropriate. When you think about it, Obama is a senator, a government official. He has a valid reason to visit, but not his campaign staff. Hospitals are private, and when Bush does a photo op, they usually arrange for a meeting with staff and a few patients.
They necessarily come off as stage managed because they need to be, you can't just wander around a hospital.
July 25, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the real issue was that there was such a positive reception from the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan that they really had to dust off those pesky regulations to avoid a repeat.
July 25, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everybody...
Let's not get ourselves convinced that this is not an issue...Houston, we have a problem.
The rules at Landstuhl were exactly the same as those in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan.
The media was not allowed on that trip and his Senate staffers attended those meetings and are indeed still on the trip. This is important because otherwise Merkel and Sarkozy could not meet with him, as it would violate protocol to meet with a Presidential Candidate directly, so as long as he is there as Senator Obama, it is ok.
The media has already figured this out...and they are increasingly leery of the Obama staffers and their explanations.
I am slightly angry because this has the potential to create a cloud over the whole trip. Let's be honest...the optics are absolutely terrible. His rock star appearance in front of a foreign audience was great, but if it appears this was at the expense of visiting wounded soldiers, just because it would not be the greatest photo op of all time...well that just looks awful!
David Axelrod is hired to prevent things like this, and it seems as if every week Obama suffers from some self-inflicted mini-scandal as a result of incompetent staffers and advisors.
I am really getting tired of this...this story now has legs because of the bickering, and the Pentagon has the upper hand. The rules were exactly the same as always...you cannot change that fact.
It will now look like a lame excuse for not going is being blamed on the Pentagon, with flimsy evidence and we all know it.
This does not make Obama look like the Commander-In-Chief that we know he can be.
I hate to bring everyone back to reality, but if we keep paving these things over, the campaign will not get the message that they are shooting themselves in the foot.
Let's do Obama a favor and show some genuine concern for the lack of competence in some quarters...so that he can fix it and WIN THIS THING!
July 25, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
O indeed - let's do Obama a favor.
ROFLMAO!
July 25, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
O look folks; another one of those first time, drive by ,who wants to urge us all to beat up on Senator Obama, in order to improve his campaign. Good one.
I prefer to keep on kicking the shit out of McCain, and you know that I am making him a much stronger candidate, by doing so, right?
July 25, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The issue is it reinforces both ways barack and the dishonesty of what he says:
1) The campaign said the berlin speech was not obama campaigning but him as a citizen. on the other hand, a visit to the military would be campaigning, not as a citizen or senator.
2) The campaign statement misrepresents what the DoD told them. It is a major misrepresentation because it tries to make it out that they had no choice, but they did.
3) if obama really wanted to visit, he could have.
people who think this is "no issue" have to be a little more honest with themselves.
July 25, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
For crying out loud. His campaign was paying for the Euro leg of his overseas trip, the Government paid for the ME portion because it was an official visit of Senators. Once the Gov stopped paying, it was classified as a campaign trip by the Government. He's not calling it campaigning, the DOD is, and does so to protect the soldiers from being exploited by every Tom, Dick and Harry running for any office showing up for a Photo-Op.
Obama could have went by himself, but since it wasn't official, I don't think he would have been allowed access as Joe Citizen can't show up and walk around and Condi Rice was busy all week making sure Government staffers didn't help the Obama contingent or give them any special help.
Obama has visited the war wounded on more than a few occasions without any reporting. You read little news bits weeks later saying he was there visiting.
Again he's damned if he does, and is damned if he doesn't. If he goes and publicizes it he's exploiting the troops, and if he goes without any fanfare most assume he's never gone because the MSM didn't report on it.
July 25, 2008 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
what are u arguing? he easily could have visited without any fanfare.
so its pretty obvious from what u say and since his campaign paid for his euro trip that his berlin speech was campaigning. so when he says its not, just being a citizen, is that being honest?
July 25, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ya gotta think like a mindless, military machine to understand the (il)logic here.
Obama came to Europe on a campaign tour, so to speak. Technically, he can't jump out of his campaign suit and into his Senate suit. His being in Germany is part of the campaign, not a Senate function. I think he needs to give the military advance notice if it were a Senate function.
Typical military interpretation, but with the State Department hounding everyone on the Fed side to keep their distance from Obama while he's on this tour, it's easy to see why the military would throw a wrench between his spokes.
Also, remember the State Department advised all Fed-types in Europe they were not allowed to attend the rally in Berlin, even though the rally was at 7:00 pm when most people are off work. Would that play well in anytown USA?
There's more to this than what we see at the surface. There's some lethal under-tows being developed by Bu$h and company to stop Obama's momentum.
July 25, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tahut -
Let's put to bed conspiracy theories. They might get you to sleep at night, but they will not help Obama win.
His visit with every foreign dignitary was under the auspices of his Senatorial status. Foreign leaders would never meet with a candidate during an election cycle without this sort of cover, it violates a thousand rules of protocol. Merkel and Sarkozy are both center-right, so they would never meet with a center-left "candidate" anyway. If he arrives as Senator Obama, they are obliged as a courtesy to greet him. The differences is that they are happy with the press being there it helps them politically as well.
Most of his trip to the Middle East was paid for by the Senate Committee, not the campaign. His campaign has constantly said this trip is "not a campaign event."
Technically Obama is right that it would be innappropriate for his trip to Landstuhl to be a campaign stop, that is right. This, however, never precluded him from going as "Senator Obama" as he has done on the rest of his trip.
The reason Axelrod gave is unfortunately false. I hate to say it. They already knew the rules, as they abided by them in Iraq, Kuwait, and Afghanistan.
I really hate to be so harsh on this staff, but Axelrod's statement was as boneheaded as it could be. They must clean up their act.
The press is rapidly becoming cynical of all things Obama, we can all feel it. The problem is, it is not Obama, IT IS HIS STAFF. Axelrod's logic makes them ask themselves."How dumb does he think we are?"
I am red-faced mad about this, and anyone who cares about winning should be too. Getting into a shouting match with the Pentagon does not set the tone this trip was supposed to build. It erodes it badly.
An honest independent will come away saying, "What a lame excuse...and then they blame the Pentagon! What kind of Commander-In-Chief will he really be?"
I hate to be so pragmatic, but this is the thing that will torpedo us if we cannot get this put to an end. I am concerned and mad and I want it to get fixed...soon!
July 25, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is not blaming the Pentagon. He listened to what they said, and honored their advice and wishes. It is McCain that is using the wounded troops as a campaign prop on this issue.
You are either buying into McCain's cynical lies, or you are trying to con people into beating up on the Obama campaign team. No thank you. With friends like you, Obama does not need any enemies.
July 25, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what is your point?
Did they screw up and not know that DOD regulations would not allow them to see wounded soldiers?
Or did they know this, and know they wouldn't be allowed to see wounded soldiers, and scheduled it anyway because... why?
I'm all for an honest look at Obama campaign screwups. But if you do so, present clear facts, not bullshit like your points about the foreign leaders, of which your inclusion just seems designed to muddy the argument and create more doubt. The foreign leaders were willing to accept Obama as a visiting senator, but the Pentagon said rules wouldn't allow him to visit a hospital because of his campaign staff. What the hell does one have to do with the other?
July 25, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are we sure McShame never made a campaign-free trip to a mil.base?
I am sure that every rule that applies to B H O applies equally to McShame, and McShame will get no preferential treatment.
snarksy
July 25, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well there was that time, during the Crimean War, that McCain failed to pay a courtesy call on Florence Nightingale.
July 25, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jonze-
I hate this. You have the rose-colored goggles on. This trip was planned long ago and scheduled many days in advance, his plane was cleared to land. It was all set.
Obama was not showing up out of the blue as Joe Citizen. There was no issue with who paid his airfare to Berlin. I have not read this and nobody has said this.
Can we please stop making things up to cover up what is sheer incompetence on the part of Obama's advisors, please. PLEASE!
Would McCain have attacked him for visiting the troops? Of course not. McCain is not that stupid. How would that look? Insensitive. Obama's counterattack would be severe. It would only keep the visit in the news cycle a day longer, which would have been great.
You know, for the life of me I cannot understand why he canceled the trip. I cannot pretend to know. All I do know was that it was stupid to cancel, the excuse given was even more hollow. Then to blame it on the Pentagon...that was just downright insane. Even if the Pentagon were being jerks and whining YOU GO ANYWAY! F-em! You go and you hug the troops...they deserve it, regardless of what some bureaucrat might think. That is what a leader does...
People, let's get our act together. I have already fired off my angry letter to the campaign. One will not make a dent. A hundred? A thousand? Now you are talking...
They need to get this staff under control and focused on the game. They are starting to believe their own BS too much and they don't seem to notice that the press stopped buying it about 2 weeks ago.
Obama is being killed with "good" advice. He just needs to go out and be Obama...
July 25, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
This story is very skewed. Please re-read this... Obama was told he could not visit "with campaign staff." He is a US Senator and can go visit troops any time he wishes. However, as a political CANDIDATE for office (as defined by having an active campaign), he cannot do so as a "campaign stop." He can go without cameras and staff, but if he wanted to, he could go as "Citizen Obama" or "Senator Obama."
What is damning about this event, and this article, is exactly that he COULD visit, but since he couldn't leverage the event for the campaign, why bother? Therefore, the idea of going to see troops injured in combat is not central to the visit, but rather only its utility to the campaign. The troops don't rate even a few hours of his time if he can't use it.
From a more complete article, including that Cindy McCain was denied a similar event on the USS Comfort:
DOD spokesman says Obama camp was reminded of political rules
[UPDATED]
Chief Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell confirmed to Politico that Department of Defense officials cautioned Barack Obama's campaign that his planned visit to wounded American troops in Germany could not be political in nature and that he would be barred from bringing along campaign staff and reporters. He also said that Cindy McCain recently requested to visit sailors aboard the U.S.N.S. Comfort and was denied.
"Sen. Obama is welcome to visit Landstuhl or any military hospital in his official capacity as a United States senator," Morrell said in a brief interview. "But there is a DOD policy which governs campaigning and electioneering at military facilities that would have to be respected if he were to visit. That distinction was relayed and made clear to campaign, and they made a decision on their own based on that guidance."
Incidently, I am a combat vet. I have been to Landstul. VIP visits are a pain, but not uncommon. I have never seen a campaign stop allowed. I think both parties are morally bankrupt and have little difference except their preferred colors. Mindless drones of either side that vote party tickets are the enemies of democracy and throwbacks to the crap we tried to leave behind in Europe with factional fighting. For all of you who have never bothered to serve the nation, please think. Please stop looking for the news to confirm what you already have been told -- that is a closed loop and requires no thought. Be better than the Browns craving their soma.
July 25, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The DoD policies have been in place for decades. If the Senate staff doesn't do the coordination, how would ANY agency, including DoD, know to preemptively contact them. Further -- its the base commander who enforces the rules. Rarely does the Pentagon reach down and handle things if there are rules in place.
It was up to the Senate staff to coordinate. If coordination wasn't done, then its his staff's failure. As it was already posted, as a Senator he can go in any time he wants. No issue. It was making it a campaign stop that was the issue. If he wanted to visit troops, he could. Apparently he only wants to visit troops if he can make it work for the campaign.
And incidelty, Cindy McCain was denied a similar campaign stop on the USS Comfort. Before assuming the side are "unfair", simple fact checking does wonders--that is, unless one wishes to keep all assumptions comfortably in place. Personally, I don't believe in "faith based" politics.
July 25, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liam -
With friends like you, who apparently make up much of his staff, Obama is going to lose.
I personally am not interested in that.
I choose to think like an independent voter when necessary, so as to understand how this might look.
The spokesperson at Landstuhl said they had no idea why he was not coming. Is she a liar too? Is she a McCain plant? Come on...
I am so sick and tired of people paving over obvious mistakes. I am not loyal to the Obama staff...I am loyal to Obama the candidate.
If his staff are making silly errors, we ought to have the courage to ask that it get fixed.
Are we not critical of the right wingers for not doing this? Apparently a lot of them got the message and are as annoyed with Bush's minions as I am with David Axelrod at the moment.
Obama deserves better. This did not have to be a story, and now it is BIG one. Drudge has it in bold red font. It will be in every newspaper tomorrow. It will be on every newscast tonight. FOX and hate radio will be talking this up for the whole weekend...
...and you think this is good? This did not have to happen. He pays people to avoid messes like this...and guess what? As donors WE PAY his advisors to avoid messes like this.
Get the picture? Somebody needs to....
July 25, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Want to know what Axelrod should have said?
Due to the sheer exhaustion and intensity of this trip, Senatory Obama we will be postponing the visit to Landstuhl until later. Win or lose in November, the Senator will pay these brave men a deserved visit. While we regret the need to do this, these men deserve the full attention of the Senator, and quite honestly he just needs some rest.
That said, we will be cancelling a campaign event in early August so that Senator Obama can visit Walter Reed Army Hospital.
July 25, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Rabbit would say:
Thanks for your concern, concern, concern, CONCERN, CONCERN, CONCERN, CONCERN
July 25, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cut the bullshit. You just blew in here today with all that advice on how we all should micro manage the campaign by barraging them with condemnations for having actually doing the right thing.
I am not buying what you are selling so F you, and theTrojan Horse you rode in on.
July 25, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Fojo,
could it be because B H O could not strip his whole retinue of campaign people and still pull off the visit?
Aren't their plans pre made? People cleared, not cleared, security arrangements for the Senator, security arrangements for the base, how can he justroup of shed one g 20 people following him around and replace them with a different group? My guess is purely logistics and a frantic itinerary.
I want to know why they told B H O he could come, then pulled the carpet out from under him? Sounds like KindaSleazy Rice called off all diplomats from attending B H O speech....sure sounds like DOD made a call to Germany....never would have done it to McShame or LeChimp.
Sure seems to me LeChimp and TheCheney made liberal use of bases and military equipment for every campaign appearance outside of a National Convention Hall. And they used military to run security and keep americans away from themselves.
You sound like McShame when he says B H O was WRONG, it is NEVER inappropriate to visit the troops.....again putting his foot in his mouth because THE TROOPS are the ones who kiboshed the trip (with orders from up above, not the troops fault). So McScold whiffs again.
I want to take a moment about Mil. hyperbole. NOTHING IS TOO GOOD for the troops, or as FOJO stated above that nothing should have stopped B H O from visiting the troops, that they are the utmost and anything less is DISSING them or disrespecting the bloodied soldier....all this hyperbole. Everything OVER THE TOP. McShame and his NEVER INAPPROPRIATE as if B H O was really dissing them, or would even DARE TO during a prez. campaign. Mil. types I know, all their equipment and every decision is based on this World Doomsday Scenario....justifying almost ANY behavior.
Possible explosion from gas tanks? Dump all fuel. On whatever is below.
Possible you could get shot? Ensconce you in a 50 million dollar armored tank.
Might be a bomb somewhere...
Resort to 3rd World Dictatorship Torture Manuals and shred our Constitution and Geneva Code.
Want to show somebody you don't like them? Drop million dollar bombs on them from a 50 million dollar plane.
3000 dollar hammers
1500 dollar toilet seats
You see where I am going? There has to be some limits on this thinking. We have to use practical terminology and standard thinking. We have seen how BLIND DEVOTION and FREE PASSES have been working out for us these last 8 years. We have seen where ULTIMATE SECURITY and blowing up bogeyman are the acts of the fearful, in Wolf's clothing. We can't be totally secure. And we can't kill them all.
But because of our addiction to Hyperbole in Mil. matters, we cannot even talk about this. We are not allowed to express any other view, or disagree, or suggest better alternatives.
McShame running a complete campaign of slamming B H O with his Hyperbole Hammer....anytime the topic drifts even remotely close to a mil. issue....has to be one of the sickest things I've seen in campaigning since LeChimps first run. It promises to get no better, seemingly the only thing McShame has in his bagOTricks.
July 25, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
And if Obama left his staff and reporters behind for 5-6 hours it surely would have got out that he went to visit the hospital and thus it would have become a campaign issue.
He was told that he couldn't bring press or staff because that would make it a campaign stop - thus any visit was already colored as such. Even if he went by himself it would have been publicized, thus making a campaign "stop" of visiting the troops. Just because there wasn't a photo-op, Obama would have still been getting press from his clansdestine solo visit and thus could have been framed as pimping out the injured troops for the positive press/political gain.
IIRC this stop at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center wasn't even on the officially released itinerary, it wasn't supposed to be news - however once the cat was out of the bag going or not going was a damned if he did, damned if he didn't scenario.
You want to think the worst of Barack, go ahead.
July 25, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
George Bush has been using the military as a back drop for photo-op the entire 7 years he's been in office. Barack Obama is a US Senator and should be able to go to any military base, anytime he wants to. Whether he is a candidate, or not. And for Rice to tell diplomats overseas that they may not attend Obama rallys, well, that really sends a message to the rest of the world that the US is all about freedom, doesn't it?
July 25, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cute, I like TPM's little update--kind'of no story, move along folks.
Problem is that Obama has told so many stories that he can't get his story straight--fact-finding trip or campaign trip. Now, as excuse for him not visiting wounded Americans in Germany, it's a campaign trip. Fine, but isn't he running for U.S. president?! Why campaign in Germany and France? Does he think they'll come over in the fall and vote for him? Else, that they'll urge American's to vote for him? Maybe they'll want him for "citizen of the world". Good, we need a president that thinks of American's first and foremost.
And anyway, cancelling a visit to wounded American soldiers because he couldn't bring campaign staff and cameras should his shallowness and highlights the fact that he doesn't care about them. No pictures, no publicity, no visit.
July 25, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
You should clean your glasses. They're covered in shit.
July 25, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
josephcast
Your avatar is eerily like the stupid, repug troll weaver's. Going by your posts, you support Obama. You used to have a diffrent avatar, didn't you ?
July 25, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
it's john constantine, hellblazer. and yes, voting for obama and yes to the new avatar. i'm apparently choosing comic book characters that smoke. what do ya do?
July 25, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thats some good spinnin Greg ... hell of a way to turn a sows ear into a silk purse.
Lets be honest, Barack Hussein Obama couldn’t turn it into a carefully managed photo op, so he decided not to go. End of story.
July 25, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
uh, why do u guys bait the trolls? not like they want to "debate" any issues, and some of em actually get paid for their nonsense. given current public enthusiasm for our next presdident, it's not like what they say matters -- and you can get any of the crap they're pushin str8 from FOX, just like they do. so please don't feed them.
July 25, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jonze -
I do not know if you are actually reading the article or not...
He could not bring CAMPAIGN STAFF.
He could bring SENATE STAFF.
Just like his visit in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan.
Is this really so hard to figure out?
July 25, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAA
It's nice to see the trolls squirm and rinse and repeat.... kinda like but slamming into a light bulb.
ANd we get to clarify the facts and the truth regardless if trolls and shills rant and rave.
so...
1.
The DOD said Obama could not see the troops there with his campaign staff.
2.
Obama did not have his Senate staff with him.
3.
THis was planned weeks ago and the DOD just decided to drop it on Obama last minute....
very shitty of them.
4.
Obama's schedule with World leaders isn't up for the sudden whims of the DOD who decide to "play politics" with a planned, and CONFIRMED trip by a sitting Senator. THis hardnose enforcement of "policy" is an attempt to trip up Obama in front of World leaders. Nice try.... suckas!
THis was deliberate interference in Obama's campaign by the DOD even if Obama does not pursue it.
5. Who the hell would trust the DOD after pulling this shit?
July 25, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liam-
I usually just read.
Today I am so mad that I had to post. This is ridiculous.
I have given over $100 to this campaign, not a lot, but it is my money.
If you cannot take someone giving obvious, straightforward, honest critical advice in these comments, move to Cuba my friend....
I have not enjoyed the incompetence of the last 8 years, and I am not about to sit idly by while a bunch of political hacks screw it up again.
I rememeber Dukakis. Do you? I remember Mondale. Do you? I remember 2004...do you?
I have seen this before...we look great in July, August...just great.
September rolls around and KABOOM! We are down by 3 points. 4 points....and then it is over.
You think I am some troll, fine. You ignore me. You are not who I intend to convince anyway.
You are the problem I am trying to fix...
July 25, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fireshadow -
Please show me the evidence that he had on Senate staff.
While we are on the truth...and facts...please provide some.
His Senate Staff was in Berlin, they accompanied him with Merkel. His Senate Staff was with him during the Sarkozy visit too...
They were in Iraq...
They were in Kuwait...
They were in Afghanistan...
They had to be. Those were the rules then and now.
You try so hard by making up your own facts to cover up the obvious fact that David Axelrod is a bonehead who keeps f-ing things up.
He has alienated much of the press corp over the last two weeks.
TNR seems to have figured all of this out. Are they are bunch of trolls too? Are they? Are they a bunch of McCain plants along with the New Yorker?
Get over yourself and turn on the thinkbox. We have a problem here...it keeps happening again and again.
Even Maureen Down is writing anti-Obama columns! The LA Times reads like Fox News.
Do you not see this happening? There is a tipping point here. We are not there yet, but it happened to the last 5 Democrats who were not Bill Clinton. I see the beginning of this happening again.
The right wing attack machine is wounded, no doubt, but they took Dukakis' 15 point lead 20 years ago and turned it into a punchline told at cocktail parties...he lost by 8 points.
You think it can't happen again? Think again.
Is history so hard to read?
July 25, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
This was a "campaign leg of the trip". Apparently there are rules to distinguish between campaign funds and regular Senator duty funds and who can ride on what plane.
Therefore, there was no senate staff on board. Regardless, Obama did not plan on making it a "photo op", since it was not to be a campaign stop.... that just happened to be who was funding that leg of the trip. But the Pentagon said they would consider it a Campaign stop.
How convenient that they should discover this at the last minute!
"“The senator decided out of respect for these servicemen and women that it would be inappropriate to make a stop to visit troops at a U.S. military facility as part of a trip funded by the campaign,” Mr. Gibbs said.
Info is from link in article above.
Also all the hyperventilating that McCain is doing is bullshit because he had to do the same thing:
From CNN:
With Department of Defense rules prohibiting political campaigning on military bases, it was determined that in some cases McCain could visit the installations as a senator but could not engage in any political activity or have news media present. McCain campaign officials said Thursday they intentionally did not campaign on military property.
“We follow the rules,” said senior McCain adviser Steve Schmidt.
It's just McCain flailing and trying to get attention and not remembering what the hell he himself has had to do..
July 25, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fireshadow...
You are great at inventing your own facts about the rules. Too bad you are completely wrong. His Senate Staff is perfectly free to fly on the same plane. Obama's Senate Operations Budget simply reimburses his campaign for fair and reasonable expenses. Do you think the rest of the world is this stupid?
Do you really?
The Senate Staffers were in Berlin and attended the meeting with Merkel. Please explain this in the context of your BS. Why were they in Paris with Sarkozy? Please clarify...and provide some evidence because your word is quite thin at this point.
Spreading falsehoods will do nothing to get Obama elected.
I am so tired of you robots glossing over this stuff. It was a huge mistake unless you think this is a great headline to see on Drudge. And on CNN. And on every other news website at some point today.
Savvy campaigns never let this kind of thing happen in the first place.
It was an amateur mistake and those of you blaming the Pentagon are just making excuses for David Axelrod. Too bad he is not on the ticket, Obama is...
...and please where is your evidence that the Pentagon "forgot to mention" things.
It is Axelrod's JOB to confirm everything THREE TIMES. Given that these are the same rules that existed in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan makes me inclined to think that you are just making it all up as you go along.
This is the behavior that has got to stop. The press simply is not buying this anymore...
July 25, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he wanted to see the soldiers he certainly could have. No one was denying him and I didn't see his "campaign staff" walking up the steps today with Sarkozy or strolling with Merkel. These people are obviously much more important to Mr. Obama then some poor slobs that just gave limbs to give him the right to run for this country. What a class A jerk this man is and anyone that tries to justify this is mentally twisted and so far removed from truth and reality that they may be a danger to themselves and others.
July 25, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey netboyrick,
Apparently you didn't read the post directly above your "mentally twisted" post.
This was a set up by the Pentagon to embarrass Obama by dropping some rules they "neglected to mention" three weeks ago when they scheduled it.
They didn't seem to have that problem with McSame when he did his little out of country romp.
July 25, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Fireshadow,
Not only did I read the post I understood it. It doesn't matter if that in fact did occur. They did NOT bar him from seeing the troops. Apparently, it was so unimportant to him that he decided not to go because of a rule change. Do you get that? If you really want something you don't allow something so minor to stop you from doing it. That is the point. Period. He did not care enough to go. He did not care enough to go. Good God some people are thick.
July 25, 2008 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg -
I can find no comment or statement by anyone on the Obama campaign that no Senate Staff were on the plane.
Please update your post with this information.
The fact that Obama met with foreign dignitaries as a "Senator" both before and after the scheduled visit to Landstuhl makes this claim quite incredible.
It would go a long way if you could source that claim to someone or something, because quite frankly it makes no sense.
This is a serious post and deserves some serious sourcing to meet any sort of journalistic standard.
Thanks.
July 25, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Double standard see below:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/25/state-obama-speech/
July 25, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg -
Please explain this...from the AP
"PARIS (AP) — An aide to Sen. Barack Obama said Friday the Democratic presidential contender believed he could visit wounded troops at a military hospital in Germany without involving them in a campaign controversy and scrapped his plans after the Pentagon raised concerns.
The spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said the Air Force several days ago cleared Obama's chartered campaign jet to land at Ramstein Air Base."
So this was in PARIS. Note the first FIVE WORDS "An aide to Sen. Barack Obama"
I could be wrong but Robert Gibbs is his SENATE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR! That sounds like staff to me.
http://obama.senate.gov/speech/050627-us_senator_barack_obama_addres/
I think we all deserve an explanation here...I doubt we will get it.
July 25, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
ForgottenMiddle,
You are indeed wrong--Robert Gibbs is the campaign's "senior strategist for communications and message."
July 25, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you guys are not going to post any more of my comments?
Robert Gibbs, regardless of his role on the campaign, is a member of Senator Obama's Senate Staff. Official records back that up.
He was with the Senator on the entire trip.
You should refrain from making unsubstantiated comments if you want anyone to respect this blog.
When you do make comments that change the entire nature of the story, source them.
This is so journalism 101 that I cannot believe I am wasting my time.
Let's see if you have the courage to greenlight this post...
July 26, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
You want proof Robert Gibbs is a Senate Staffer?
http://www.legistorm.com/person/Robert_L_Gibbs/6166.html
latest available data is FY2007...
July 26, 2008 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
And somehow it would not support McCain's push for offshore drilling, lol.
July 26, 2008 6:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Smells of Republican interference. Did anyone hear Andrea Mitchell's ist response on "Morning Joe"? She said Obama was all set to go until the pentagon said they couldn't. The pentagon waited until Wednesday to tell Obama's campaign that they would be barred. They waited until the senators had gone to inform the campaign. Perhaps this is why the Obama campaign was angry as Andrea had stated. Keith Olbermann confirmed that the pentagon barred Obama from visiting the injured troops and was playing Politics. This is the mess that needs to be changed: same ol' Republican tactics. Obama is taking the high road and not hollering conspiracy. The Republicans tried so hard to demean Obama's trip to no avail. Enough is enough!
July 26, 2008 6:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
"latest available data is FY2007"
And you're chiding people about journalistic standards?
I'm a new poster here, so I think it's possible I'm being taken in by a joke, but I'll go on.
Robert Gibbs was indeed a Senate staffer previously. Today, though, in 2008, he's a campaign staffer.
July 26, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
jb207 -
In case you are unaware of the fact, one CAN be a Senate staffer and a campaign staffer at the same time.
July 26, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's my understanding that you can't have a full-time job on the campaign--as Gibbs does--and be on the Senate staff.
Anyway, even if Gibbs had donned his "Senate staffer" hat to visit the hospital, they were still travelling on campaign money, on the campaign plane. Staffing wasn't the only consideration.
July 26, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
This episode shows that McCain is willing to do anything to win this election...he learned the wrong things from his own '00 experience... http://www.enewsreference.com
July 26, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for clearing this up to the world. McCain usually seems to just want to grab one thing that comes up and twist it until something of essence comes out of it.
Check out nyDem.com for all you latest Democratic and Obama news.
-nyDem.com
July 27, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I live in Colorado and just McCain's new attack ad in Colorado and it is really disgusting. I will be donating to Obama because of the ad. I want to enable him to combat that crap. He says he canceled his trip to see the troops because he wouldn't leave behind the media and tha the would rather shoot hoops than visit the troops. Please join me in donating to Senator Obama this week in response to McCain's lies. I definitely want to see Senator Obama win Colorado.
July 27, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I need an update or clarificaiton -- would it have been possible for Obama to visit the troops on his own without staff? Or was the fact that he traveled with campaign staff rather than Senate staff the problem? What if he had flown Senate staff over for the day?
On the larger topic -- Obama is calling to reduce walls between us and Europe. He is the chair of a Senate committee which could have done that but held no meetings. A week of photo ops around the world is a very poor substitute for actual work.
July 27, 2008 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
so obama cancels visiting the troops because his campaign staff could not attend? why didn't he just visit them on his own and not take them? does he feel they are not worth visiting unless you can get additional press or media benefit from it? no matter how you folks try to paint this it looks bad to me.
July 27, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
jb207 -
Thanks for clear this all up "your understanding" is all the evidence we need...
ARE YOU KIDDING?
Ramstein AFB had cleared the plane to land. They had set aside a gate in the passenger terminal for the media and campaign staff to get off, stretch, get some food, etc.
The Pentagon never mentioned any of that, they only mentioned who could accompany him.
STOP MAKING UP YOUR OWN FACTS! The rest of the world is not as stupid as you seem to think.
You are just being self-delusional when you make up your own facts to defend the incompetent staff who failed to get the details in order appropriately.
WAKE UP!
July 27, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
AJM -
The Senate Staff was already there. Greg was unfortunately making up his own facts, without sourcing them appropriately.
They accompanied Obama the whole way...as there has been no evidence presented by anyone here that the Senate Staff did not make the Berlin, Paris, London leg of the trip.
I am still waiting for that evidence, the silence is indeed deafening...Greg!
Robert Gibbs still is on Obama's Senate Staff according to official records...and nobody has shown any evidence that the has RESIGNED from his Senate Staff...surely that would have generated a press release!
Feel free to post that, I would love to see it!
So to answer the question...of course he could have visited. Some genius on his staff decided it would not be worth the effort...a boneheaded move.
Then, once they realized it might look bad for cancelling, they just blamed the Pentagon. Very mature! Obama will lose with idiots like this...
We all know he loves the troops and has been to Walter Reed many times. But as a result of the incompetence of some on his staff, McSame gets to paint Obama as a media-happy opportunist who could care less unless a camera is there to record the event...
Nothing could be farther from the truth! This is what happens when you place incompetence above criticism...it breeds more incompetence.
We saw this behavior from Bush, and I did not like it then either...
July 27, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michelle -
It is so refreshing to see a pragmatic mind among the sea of automatons...
Of course this looks bad...very bad. If that were not the case, would McSame have an ad out in less than 48 hours to exploit it? In DENVER, where the DNC Convention is going to be? No way...this was bad.
Those of you deluding yourself that this is somehow a good thing because it will just backfire on McCain...you still don't get it. You are still waiting for the Swift Boat attack to backfire on Bush too, right? Those attacks cost us the election...WAKE UP!
This was a Class A Gaffe. The only way to prevent it from happening again is to admit what it was, address it head on, and fix the problem that caused it...
I think it is clear by now that this race will not be a blowout. This screwup may have cost Obama a million votes or more...
In a race that may be decided by a million votes, several more of these will sink us...
July 27, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those of you who really want to know what happened, I think Jim Miklaszewski over at NBC probably is closest to the answer.
Retired General Scott Gration has arranged the whole thing well in advance. It was not until Wednesday that the Pentagon go the list of people who would attended, and their role on the visit.
The list included General Scott Gration who was listed as a campaign advisor. This was raised as an issue by the Pentagon because he did not have an "official capacity" on the visit. The General would not be allowed to visit...
You can imagine that Generals, retired or not, do not appreciate being told "No". He went ballistic and as a sign of solidarity with the Retired General, the campaign backed out of the visit.
Now, who was wrong and who was right? Technically, the General had no role inside Landstuhl without official business. His role on the campaign does not entitle him to that.
Were the Pentagon being jerks? YES, they were. His role as a General would have allowed them to make an exception, if they really wanted to. They did not want to, that probably has more to do with Scott Gration and less to do with Obama.
But was the campaign right in pulling out? Well, you watch that McSame ad and you tell me...do you think that is a good ad for Obama?
You already know what I think...make up your own mind...
July 27, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
"jb207 -
Thanks for clear this all up "your understanding" is all the evidence we need...
ARE YOU KIDDING?"
ForgottenMiddle,
Get a grip. You cited FY 2007 data as proof of where someone was employed in 2008. That's nonsensical. I couldn't find a press release about it, but the job you claim Gibbs still holds in Obama's office is now held by Michael Ortiz.
This all isn't very relevant anyway.
July 27, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
They will not let a little thing like the truth get in the way. I wish the first debate was tomorrow? But it's not and in the meantime, they will do all they can do, at Karl Rove's suggestions, to keep Barack Obama on the defensive.
I hate to say but I think it is time for Obama to take the gloves off. It's time to hit back with some hard facts on Mr McCain.
First of all, it is despicable that he would question the patriotism of another candidate of the opposite Party by saying that he would rather win the election than win the war. It does seem that Senator McCain is becoming rather vile in his desperation?
And to suggest that the entire war is centered around the strategy of the surge is false. The surge was started to create room for a dialogue between the warring Parties, because when it started, the situation had deteriorated in almost complete chaos and anarchy. The "surge" was an act of desperation. It took months before the surge was completed and the Sunnis had already defeated the al Qaeda whom were assisting them and decided to talk with the Americans to get some of the same financial assistance they were giving the Shia. We sat down and talked with the same enemies that were killing us before, much to the chagrin of Shia government. We decided to pay them a lot of money to stop the violence. Nobody knows how much was paid to al Sadr to stop his killing??
July 27, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The candidate who failed to go to see the wounded soldiers in the military hospital is also the one who brushed off the journalist in the car factory to look at the shiny red sports car instead of answering the question of what he might do to help factory workers.
August 12, 2008 3:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
The notion that Obama was told he couldn't visit the troops but McCain, his idiots, Hillary Clinton, anyone else could, is another freedom this government not only denied Obama, but the troops that are putting their lives on the line for hes LIE. Incredibly stupid to consider "America the Free" when this happens from the Commander in Thief.
August 25, 2008 7:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
The issue is: "If the camera's aren't there I (Obama) am not going! What's the point!" He had the option of going (without staff) or not going at all. He chose not to go, since it would mean he would not get any publicity out of it in the media, which was the whole purpose of the trip to begin with! He could care less about the troops..or he would care for the troops if he could benefit with some media exposure! Ironic... we could care less where in Europe he goes.. and quite frankly if he stayed over there.. would suit a lot of us fine!
September 10, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
The issue is: "If the camera's aren't there I (Obama) am not going! What's the point!" He had the option of going (without staff) or not going at all. He chose not to go, since it would mean he would not get any publicity out of it in the media, which was the whole purpose of the trip to begin with! He could care less about the troops..or he would care for the troops if he could benefit with some media exposure! Ironic... we could care less where in Europe he goes.. and quite frankly if he stayed over there.. would suit a lot of us fine!
September 10, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
enter simple the you google travesti wirled sincle the you thank travesti not found the faildy chirk.
August 15, 2010 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink