« Obama Responds To FISA Group On His Web Site | Home | Report: Obama Camp Considering Football Stadium For Acceptance Speech »
Obama Reiterates: Combat Troops Out Of Iraq In 16 Months
Barack Obama held a second presser today to respond to the suggestion that because he said he would "continue to refine" his Iraq policies that this somehow heralded a change in his position on withdrawal from Iraq...
The key line: Obama said that he would "not refine the 16-month timetable."
Advertisement















He's in the weeds now on this. Not necessarily a bad thing. But, he's going to have to have some representation on the talk shows to make his position clear. A competent interview would be nice.
July 3, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, the GOP is winning this round. Obama needs to hammer this meme into the ground with a hammer for the next few days. (Of course, still probably helps feed the MSM narrative of casting doubt -- "you protest too much")) Grrrrrrr. I hate the Media.
July 4, 2008 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but he can turn it into an opportunity if he plays it smart. And we've all seen him do that. He has an audience on this issue - they're tone-deaf, but the MSM is just the conduit to the American public (and only one conduit, although a primary one). He needs to play that to his advantage. Use his considerable communication skills and the talents of the impressive team that he's assembled to neutralize this. Letting it ride will prove to be corrosive, I think.
July 4, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you really want to find out who is at fault before reading further, go to NBC's website. On the homepage is the inflammatory headline with the misleading AP article. Then click on "Politics" and check out the "First Read" article by NBC reporters. It gets the story right. Same outlet, different stories. Obama has not changed anything. The press is intellectually challenged or deliberately dishonest. Here is my version of the difference using a different topic:
NBC: Actress to "refine" role of sexual character in stage play.
AP: Actress opens door to altering sexuality.
Stuggles leave door open to changing role.
Something stinks and it is not Obama.
July 4, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice MSM-GOP hit job here.
I'm curious, is the GOP faxing over talking points to the MSM, or using email. Anyhow, they really stay on message like they are paid to.
July 3, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican fax machines must be whirring away and overheating on this one. I saw Scarborough host Race For The Whitehouse and it was a straight out Rovian hit job. Rachel Maddow was on there holding her own against four conservatives and as valiant an effort as it was it wasn't pretty. Someone needs to call this Obama "flip-flop" the lie that it is, sort of like Bloomberg did in Florida. I was so pissed off would've driven a Weiner mobile into somebody.
July 3, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
"TPM really needs an edit feature, seriously..."
There should be an I in there...
July 3, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now what happens to all those who signed up demanding that Senator Obama do what they demanded on FISA? He just said no to them. He sugar coated the no, but it was still a flat out no, and said that if that is a deal breaker for them, then so be it. Is it, and if it is not, then what the hell was it you were all about. Are you going to no longer support him?
The network evening news is full of items about how Obama does not keep his word. You provided a lot of the fuel for that fire, you did not get Obama to change his mind, but you did give McCain plenty of ammo to attack Obama with.
Two row boats are racing to the other side of a broad deep river, one captained by McCain and the other by Obama. It was a very close race, with some saying that Obama had a slight lead. Some of the rowers in the Obama boat took a look at that slight lead and decided that this would be the time to stop rowing, so they stood up in the boat and rocked it, while there was still more than ninty percent of the river to cross.
Some might say that made no sense, but those rowers who stood up, and rocked the boat felt that it was more important to stand up and give the Captain a good dressing down, while the McCain boat rowed on unchallenged. One would think, from their behavior, that the rowers have grown complacent because Republican rarely win the White House, except it is actually the other way around. Of course, electing the first African American as the next President, makes it a lock, so those rowers are free to keep on rocking his boat. Everyone knows that an African American can not be beaten in America, right?
Happy Independence Day. Senator McCain likes the way you handled this week.
July 3, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Obama said he wanted to run a different kind of campaign. Appealing to our better half was part of that difference. He wanted to stay above politics and speak to the issues. That was what I understood him to mean when he spoke of a different kind of politics.
As soon as he secured the nomination he began to practice politics as usual with the bullsh*t notion that you have to tact to the middle. We are not a centrist country. We are, in fact, a liberal country.
Senator Obama does not get to speak of a new kind of politics when it suits him, and then employ the old kind of politics when it suits him. He either stands for something, or he stands for nothing.
So, yes, we hold him to account. That is what you do when someone is walking away from their ideals.
July 3, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goddammit, its ""tack," not "tact."
And he in now way tacked, or even tacted, to the middle, or any damn where else on this issue. Every statement he's made on this issue for the last two two years. He hasbeen perfectly consistent about withdrawal, his one to two brigades a month out in sixteen months timeline, and his willingness to refine, but not materially change, the plan on the basis of realities on the ground.
The only reason anyone thinks differently is because the MSM cannot stop itself--after there is a nominee, every story must be crammed into the frame of "Democratic nominee is a flip-flopper." The slightest change in inflection or change in wording triggers this response until after the convention, when they can accuse him of liberalism. Apparently, if they can't do this in an election year, their little local-teevee news trained speech and communications major heads will explode like Martians listening to Slim Whitman.
And sorry about the "goddamit," but that particular misusage popped up out of nowhere on cable news during the primaries and its been driving me batshit crazy.
July 3, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sigh. "tack."
July 3, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goddamit, it's "it's", not "its".
(Couldn't resist -- no harm intended!)
July 4, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is quite clear the the Raging Left has damaged his campaign because they are morons and can't read a fucking book or use the Intertubes. Your whole Barack-is-Selling-US-Out crew are really starting to come across as a neocon trolls or a politically-naive 2 year olds.
Let me slow it down for you:
Politicians (like every other person on the planet) CHANGE THEIR FUCKING MINDS when receiving new information. Further, they should refine their opinion based on new information or else we get Baby Bush. Also, this country is mostly CONSERVATIVE. That's not to say they are neoconservative or even republican, but Americans a much more cautious and conservative lot (regardless of party) than the netroots left would make them. It's enough to elect a black guy, let alone a black guy is a total "pussy" who let's our national security interests suffer because of lefty idealism.
You need to go see some more of America before you start making asinine assumptions about the American voter.
You sound just like these douche-bag reporters who can't seem to understand what a monumental task pulling our troops out Iraq is. If Barack pulls it off in 16 months, he will be the world's best politician. Ever. The best he can hope for is to begin the job as quickly as possible, but that will indeed depend on the situation as he finds it on the ground and how many allies he can convince to replace US troops as they leave, so as to maintain an international peacekeeping force on the ground. If we pull out without putting in the UN, Iraq will be a bigger bloodbath than it already has been.
Finally, if he is doing his job correctly, the 20% of this country who are far to the left should get pissed. This country isn't only yours and Barack isn't governing for you. He needs to use centrists language to promote very liberal policies. He also knows a shit-ton more about classified information than you do, so perhaps he is the one better informed on this issue.
You keep posting bullshit like this and I will officially have to become your shadow, because your side of the party have cause enough damage to our nominee. This is what I call damage control and you are the leak in the side of our ship.
If you continue to bring us down with this kind of one-sided and narrow-minded comments, I will make it my missing counter your (and all the rest of the concern trolls) lack of nuance and historical understanding at every turn.
July 4, 2008 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would be my "mission" to counter your propaganda, though missing is appropriate as well since many of your comments are missing all context and nuance.
July 4, 2008 6:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, let's see ... I've lived in Florida, Texas, New York, Oregon, Washington state and Connecticut. I'm a consultant who for the past 6 years has travelled about 60% of the time, flying coast-to-coast into and out of about 4 dozen airports. I've worked in the office with and sat across the lunchtable from and talked on the phone with hundreds of Americans. Does that constitute "seeing more of America"? I wonder how much you've seen outside your HDTV?
Let me break it down for you. A lot of Obama-bots drank the kook-aid and spread the message that Barack Obama was the new progressive messiah, The Anointed One, who offered "change you can believe in." Then he secured the nomination, the more honest candidates having all been vanquished, the supply of kook-aid was cut off and the hangover set it. A portion of the Obama-bots, denied their preferred substance of abuse, became angry when his DLC positions became apparent. They began demanding that he honor the pledges he made during the campaign for the nomination. As you correctly pointed out, he flatly said "NO, I am not going to honor those pledges. You served your purpose, and I don't care what you think, now."
Another portion of the kook-aid addicts -- yourself among them, apparently -- don't care if he honors any of the promises he made. You don't care how many lies he tells, or whether he honors any of his pledges. You are absolutlely opposed to holding him accountable for word or deed. "Just elect him. Nothing else matters."
And then, of course, there is the teetotalling 50% of the Democratic party that never drank the kook-aid and knew he was a Huey Long from the upper midwest all along. We can only shake our heads, once again holding our noses to vote for the worst candidate on offer this season. And hope he doesn't damage our country as much as the other guy most assuredly would.
Thanks for doing your part, again, to contribute to the failure of progressive politics in America.
Thanks.
mp
July 4, 2008 7:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anybody who starts off touting themselves as more qualified than someone else based on the fact they can't or don't want to live in the same place very long raises my eyebrows. Then, after characterizing themselves as someone who knows a lot about people, generalizes about a whole group with the perjorative and overused "drank the kool-aid" meme, they prove they are totally shallow and self consumed.
You haven't been drinking Kool-Aid, you've been sniffing your own offal and find it's like flowers. Adjust your olfactory.
July 4, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
By your argument, Obama could refine, move or flip-flop all the way to the Far Right if he wanted, and no loyal Democrat should ever say anything about it, because we have to cower in fear about how the MSM will use the fact of any disagreement whatsoever to distort our candidate's public image?
Fortunately, that isn't the way it has to be, and it isn't the way it's going to be. You're just going to have to deal with dissent in the ranks, because it's not going away. Dissent made visible is one of the great *features* of the Netroots. It's not a bug.
And blaming dissenters for damaging Obama's campaign is messed up, frankly. It doesn't help that it's SOP for how what we call The Left gets treated in every single presidential election for the last 40 years. (= "Shut up and sit down!") Hope you don't mind if I resent the hell out of that.
It's up to our candidate to run the great campaign we all know he is capable of. I don't want to get to November and feel like I'm holding my nose when I pull the lever for him -- I want to feel like he's The Guy We've All Been Waiting For. Don't you?
July 4, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uh liam... does this mean we not able to criticize the decisions our candidate makes for fear that the big bad republicans will get him? you sir, are an ass.
July 7, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The public is not that stupid.
You can tell from the manner of speech, the inflections, the breathlessness of the reporters that they are overbearing and arrogant.
The public knows what's up with the reporting and always have an insight of their own into these things.
July 3, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
the updated AP story begins with:
The "not basically alter" part is an improvement, but of course, we had to have the "struggle" thrown in. In fairness, two press conferences to explain something probably is a bit of a struggle.
I'm just glad that today is July 3, tomorrow is Friday, and a holiday. Hopefully, this will blow over, and the Obama campaign (and the DNC) figure out a way to counteract the RNC, McCain and the reflex in many media outlets to paint any Democrat as a weak flip-flopper.
CNN has poll numbers that show that most people think McCain and Obama have flip-flopped, and that most people don't care.
Have a nice Fourth, everyone!
July 3, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
You too!
July 3, 2008 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
From prior post re: FISA
Reading the comments here, I am disgusted. As one of the most ardently condemning people about Obama's FISA stance, I am satisfied and thankful that he took the time to explain in depth his position and reasoning. It was what I was asking for. That being said, enough already.
Without a shadow of a doubt, he is the better man. And if we all don't start coming together and fight the MSM, we will pay a huge price. They are NEVER going to hit McCain on anything unless we demand it. Our enemy is not FISA, Iraq, etc. It IS the media, and we had better sharpen our knives as they and McCain have, because they are sticking it in deeper every day.
July 3, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
From prior post re: FISA
Wow, Amelie. You're exactly right. Thank you for bringing clarity to a muddled mess.
;D
July 3, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I appreciate that, thanks so much.
July 3, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. Give and credit where's it's due, and recognize rationality for what it is.
July 3, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should be just "Give credit"... TPM really needs an edit feature, seriously...
I'm sure you got the idea anyway.
July 3, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Man, are we all drinking tonight or are we just running a mass "why we need an edit function" demo?
Not that those are mutually exclusive activities, of course.
July 3, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
A little of both, I think. xD
July 3, 2008 10:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. And I still believe the narrative about a candidate isn't developed at the convention. It's developed in June and July, when no one but the candidates and the press are paying attention.
And why the press continues to be McCain's little lap dogs is just mystifying to me.
"Obama refused to fist bump with a little boy". False.
"Obama softening his position on Iraq." False.
This is just shoddy, crappy journalism and headline writing.
I have to go. This is making me too mad.
July 3, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Wesley Clark swiftboated McCain." False.
"Obama got a suspicious home loan." False.
And that's just since Sunday.
July 3, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is f*cking this up with stupid, stupid rookie mistakes.
What a shocker...Not.
July 3, 2008 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
UGGGGHHHH!
Troll-jizz!
July 3, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of fucking idiots.
July 3, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
And you're a dumb motherfucking McSame troll, just like you were in the primaries. So?
July 4, 2008 7:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus Christ! What a bunch of fucking idiots.
July 3, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow!!! An honest headline for a change. Now if only the MSM can do the same thing maybe their readership will rebound again.
July 3, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to work on not stuttering when he is thinking on his feet. It gives him the appearence of either being unsure, or that he is holding back from wanting to strangle the reporters.
That being said, he gave a solid answer to a difficult question. Yes, we are going to pull out, yes the goal is 16 months. yes, if the commanders say we need 17 months, we will take 17 months...why does he have to spell it out.
That the GOP is feeding this to the MSM is pretty darn clear.
July 3, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
These are questions I would ask:
"Do you have a set date for the visit to Iraq and will it coincide with your other schedule of traveling abroad to Europe and the Middle East?"
Have you spoken with any officials in the Iraqi government of the frame of discussions that will take place?"
"How much introduction (in length of days to visit) do you feel it necessary for continuing meaningful constructive discussion later?"
"Would you approach the subject with them of inviting officials of Iraq to the United States if you are elected?"
"Will your trip include looking at environmental and infrastructure issues in Iraq?"
"Will your look at Iraq give you information on how to structure the Veterans Administration?"
"Will you have members of your campaign foreign affairs advisory team with you to examine their possible appointment to your administration?"
Possibilities are endless.
July 3, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just stopping in to see the massive rationalization continue, as it must, if ya'll want to continue to pretend as though this guy is worth it. I am disappointed only in Greg Sargent, a demonstrably smart person, whom I've wished all along would have a clearer head about Obama.
It's as though none of you ever watched an election. You're acting as though the MSM is a rational thing, governed by smart liberal heads. And here they are, NOT any such thing! Boo hoo!
They never have been, my friends. And Obama reveals his wet-behind-the-ears condition, as well, by continuing to trip over his own tongue trying to keep up with his own mistakes, covering so ineffectually his own rear end, now exposed for what it is - an ass of many colors, just like in the Wizard.
Better get your mom to belt you in a little tighter. It's gonna be a rough ride.
July 3, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah.
The McCain Wagon train.
July 3, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
You seem like the type of person that lots of people like to be around.
July 3, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is for Liam, with whom I often agree. It is not an act of treachery to disagree with and even castigate Obama on his "fluid" maneuverings. As a matter of fact, it's Obama who's submitting his resume to WE, the PEOPLE for the most important job in the world. We NEED to hold his feet to the fire, Damn it! He's a politician who wants to represent OUR INTERESTS! We have every right and a heavy obligation to "stop rowing" if we think we're headed in a bad direction, and tell the "captain" that we're off course.
No one who is objecting to the FISA CAVE! is likely to vote for John McMoreWar. We sure as HELL have the right and the duty to let our "leader" know what we think of his maneuverings.
Get over the vapid fear that we will "LOSE" the election if we dare to put a speed bump in the way of a candidate who has welcomed our input. If he wants our money and our effort to win the election, then he'd better damn well be willing to hear form our passionate activists when he jumps the shark in the name of "centrism". The center has been dragged so far into the political right wing that it has no real meaning anymore. Welcome to progressive activism.
July 3, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know what the real activism was?
The stuff that happen between 1999-2006.
Where were all the "baby boomers" then?
They took it away from the youth again.
And they're blocking the way again. As always. Every since the 60's. They're the old guard.
Didn't you see the mantle change?
July 3, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah.
The McCain Wagon train.
Posted by quasar
More wishful thinking. Just by your attitude, I know I am more righteously liberal than YOU are. Obama moves to the right, anybody hoping for REAL change gives up hope. He's YOUR guy. Live with it.
July 3, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean self righteous.
July 3, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank God. The Purity Police are here.
Thank you for your "concern" casey. With your help, we'll be sure not to elect any unpure Democrats, ever.
July 3, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Casey's not concerned about purity. It's a McCain troll - here to sow discord and chaos. It is best to ignore this one.
July 4, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the damage is done on both the FISA issue and now this. People hear the first uproar, but seldom absorb the responses. Obama goes into this long weekend on the ropes, and that is what people will be discussing over their picnics etc. I know that it has been pure bullshit promulgated by the MSM, and the FISA dust up by a relatively small number of petitioners, but perception is reality, and now the Republicans will hammer him on every nuance from here to election day, as another example of him fudging on his word.
I fear that this is going to really harm Obama in the swing states that he was counting on to put in play. He better take off the gloves, and start landing such punches on McCain. The best defense is a strong offense. If he keeps playing defense and having to explain himself over and over on every issue, he will lose.
That is what bothers me most about the damn FISA petition drive. Common sense would tell you that he could not possible reverse himself for to please them, but of course they just had to engage in their little hissy fits of myopic self indulgence, and force Senator Obama to play defense.
Look at some of the posts that those petition signers are now posting about how wonderful they feel that he acknowledged that they had a right to disagree with him. Of course he went on to tell them, that he was not going to switch to suit them, and if that was a deal breaker, then so be it. From that they select the part where he sugar coated the part where he flat out said no to them.
They forced him to play defense and handed McCain some bricks to put in his, Obama does not keep word, wall, but at least those petitioners can sleep as cozy as a smug in a rug, because Senator Obama said they had a right to their opinion.
Well as long they feel special, then that is all that really matters.
July 3, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
liam, you said: He better take off the gloves, and start landing such punches on McCain. The best defense is a strong offense. If he keeps playing defense and having to explain himself over and over on every issue, he will lose.
Yes, yes and yes! He is getting his ass kicked.
July 3, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama?
Getting his ass kicked?
This is the same thing that was said over the Clark issue.
He'll come out hard. After the holiday.
All this is just alarmist talk.
July 3, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, you are right. I just read this, truly, A MUST READ, and I totally realized how right on it is. So I can celebrate on the 4th happily. If you have time, it is well worth it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/senator-obama-in-the-summ_b_110545.html
July 3, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you...that was a comforting read.
"HOPE" is a noun and a verb.
July 3, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was, without a doubt, one of the best articles concerning Obama that I have ever read, especially considering the current situations going on, and this "Summer of Awful." Thanks for that, Amelie, it really lifted my spirits higher than I thought they could go.
July 3, 2008 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good, enjoy your 4th :)
July 3, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
That hit the spot! I emailed that link to about a dozen people. As Adam Clayton Powell would say: "keep the faith, baby!"
July 3, 2008 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
:)
July 3, 2008 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. You too. ;D
July 3, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good read. Thank you. It reminds all of us to keep the eye on the ball. Out of all the candidates in probably all our lifetimes, obama is best positioned to enact some dem policies and to help the american people for once as opposed to the super wealthy and big corporations. Thanks again.
July 4, 2008 8:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
It would be easier for him to land punches on McCain if he'd stop triangulating his way to the right.
Sheesh, you true believers want it both ways. You've got this fantasy that we're in some kind of post-partisan world and believe you me there's nothing post-partisan about Republicans. So when your candidate does the nuance thing, they jump all over him. Well, wake up. Are you all so young you weren't around during the 2004 campaign? How did putting on the uniform and saluting work for John Kerry? Did they respect his war record? Did they appreciate his nuanced views about war past, present and future? No they had him for lunch!
It's darn hard to fight them if you are afraid to oppose them.
July 3, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Didn't you just say that after hearing his FISA clarification, you are not going to vote for him? Since that is the case, shouldn't you be huddling with your PUMA brethern!
July 3, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
They haven't done anything but shout at clouds.
July 3, 2008 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he was able to reverse himself FROM HIS ORIGINAL POSITION, he can certainly reverse himself BACK TO HIS ORIGINAL POSITION.
Hissy fit is an interesting term. Is that what you were doing when you were flogging Hillary for her war vote. It's not as if her vote would have changed the start of the war, just like Obama's vote won't "stop the bill."
The MEANS justify the ENDS. It's the journey. Stand for something.
July 3, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
That last sentence was a metaphor on your avatar, right?
July 3, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
excellent :)
July 3, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama can be this loose I think we can too.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/07/02/moos.daddy.o.soccer.cnn?iref=videosearch
July 3, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was nice. Real sweet.
July 3, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liam, I agree. Although there are some exceptions were i disagree. I agree Barack Obama has been dinged by FISA, but most Americans don't care about FISA, so the damage will not be long lasting. However, i don't know how the Obama campaign allowed the republicans and media to distort his position on Iraq--it is truly stunning! Obama needs to start throwing some punches @ McCain and make they land. He needs to reinforce his surrogate supporter. Where is Biden, Dodd, Webb, H.Clinton, McCaskill, Rockefeller and the others? Why aren't they on the phone holding daily press conferences reinforcing the Obama message? What is Barack waiting for? C'mon on Barack, lets get it together, lets not make this election another 00' and 04'
July 3, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It happened because Obama is the enigma in this election and the only candidate that most people care about. As such, there are certain forces within the media that want to define him negatively, and those forces are given leeway to drive the narrative on Obama because the resulting controversy drives ratings.
Obama has been doing a good job pushing back, and to his credit, he made sure to push back strongly on this distortion personally. But this will keep happening until the people doing it get their hands slapped and hard. I'm thinking like the pushback against Fox after the madrasa garbage last year.
You can't blackout the entire media establishment, but something needs to be done to stop then from playing mischief with facts just because it's fun for them to do.
I mean, how many more "OMG, Obama got a reasonably competitive home mortgage LOL!!1" stories do we need?
July 3, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liam, I agree. Although there are some exceptions were i disagree. I agree Barack Obama has been dinged by FISA, but most Americans don't care about FISA, so the damage will not be long lasting. However, i don't know how the Obama campaign allowed the republicans and the cynical media to distort his position on Iraq--it is truly stunning! Obama needs to start throwing some punches @ McCain and make they land. He needs to reinforce his surrogate supporter. Where is Biden, Dodd, Webb, H.Clinton, McCaskill, Rockefeller and the others? Why aren't they on the phone holding daily press conferences reinforcing the Obama message? What is Barack waiting for? C'mon on Barack, lets get it together, lets not make this election another 00' and 04'
July 3, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
dudes video says no longer available
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/obama-as-a-normal-person/
July 3, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's darn hard to fight them if you are afraid to oppose them."
Bluebell - I'm confused are you saying you support Obama? Because I thought you were saying you wanted your vote back earlier, but maybe I'm confusing you with someone else. And if you don't support Obama, then why do you care how he fights them?
July 3, 2008 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want a party and a candidate that will fight for my issues. I don't have one. I have a Congressman who does. I once had a Senator who did. I just decided after the 2004 fiasco that I am going to vote for candidates who are going to fight for my issues regardless of whether they have a chance of winning or not, because voting for candidates who sell out your issues and lose anyway is about as depressing as it gets.
Just look at that worthless Congress -- voted every penny Bush wanted for war, gave up on SCHIP and won't give up on FISA. And there was a reason it was important that they became the majority party?
July 3, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Attention world; stop what you are doing. Bluebell has special issues that you all must cater to now!
July 4, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the advice. The last time we heard this kind of "wet-behind-the-ears" "gonna be a rough ride" bluster about the naive Obama it was from that Hillary what's-her-name candidate.
Maybe you were one of them.
Anyhow, thanks again for the great advice.
July 3, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
from supporters of that Hillary what's-her-name ...
Maybe you were one of them.
Anybody mention the need for an Edit Function on TPM?
July 3, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the first of many "not ready for prime time" moments for him.
It'll be interesting to see how he deals with 'em.
July 3, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
On a tangent, do you think McCain is more ready for prime time than Obama? What mistakes has McCain made in this campaign? And what have you done to ensure McCain doesn't get elected? Who are you going to pull the lever for? And why?
July 3, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Janus McCain was ready for Prime Time back in the middle ages.
July 3, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nulook23 - Well at least Obama is not having to reorganize his staff four months after he became the candidate like McCain. Need to reorganize staff...remind you of Clinton? That makes me smile, McCain is finding his campaign against Obama in trouble just like Clinton did.
July 3, 2008 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Johnny2Bad - Not ready for prime time? Who is having to reorganize his staff? McCain is the one who is looking worried.
July 3, 2008 9:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure what Johnny2bad's angle is. Is he a Democrat who'd playing bad cop or a Republican who's playing Pandora's Jar?
July 3, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's just an Obama-hating troll from way-back when, that's all.
July 3, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pandora copping out.
July 3, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
This media daily horserace / gotcha crap has far less influence on election outcomes than the politics-obsessed imagine.
By the way, people might want to keep in mind that continued stress on not letting the 16-month timetable slip is the popular position as well as the right one. In the end that's what voters will remember- and vote for.
July 3, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, Obama tried to talk nuances about Iraq but the media just wants headlines. Stick with 16 months, it's something the media can comprehend.
July 3, 2008 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is why the FISA Bill was so important, people can't believe anything he says anymore.
This FISA Bill flip-flop was big No-No. This kind CENTER whereby Obama okay Bush law break is dead zone, they got him out - now he's screwed.
He is on his way out.
July 3, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am constantly amazed at how Republicans try to use the SAME stupid argument to the word, ie."flip-flopper", to smear Obama. If the United States should fall for this b.s for a second consecutive time, then I am sorry to say, but the best days of the nation are clearly behind them.
Just like the genius GWB said: " We got a saying in Texas:Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice...... you are not going to fool us again!!"
July 3, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's a joke. McCain's a joke. More of the same. blah-blah-blah.
July 3, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should have read: "the best days of the nation are behind her"
July 3, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The network evening news is full of items about how Obama does not keep his word. You provided a lot of the fuel for that fire, you did not get Obama to change his mind, but you did give McCain plenty of ammo to attack Obama with.
Nobody but Obama fan these fires of flip-flop failure. Nobody except Obama has himself to blame. Obamaโs constituency was never Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer or Rockefeller โ he blew it by flip-flopping on the FISA Bill and HE did flip-flop on it. Obama in good faith, got money for saying he would filibuser ANY FISA immunity deal - so it is a lied now he will support it, that is exactly how John Kerry's lost campaign too.
Obama can pull out of this nose dive anything - just by telling us he will vote against the FISA Bill, at least for now anyway and for Christ sack don't think of "center" as okaying ANY of Bush's criminal acts. Jeebus.
July 3, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The network evening news is full of items about how Obama does not keep his word. You provided a lot of the fuel for that fire, you did not get Obama to change his mind, but you did give McCain plenty of ammo to attack Obama with.
Nobody but Obama fan these fires of flip-flop failure. Nobody except Obama has himself to blame. Obamaโs constituency was never Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer or Rockefeller โ he blew it by flip-flopping on the FISA Bill and HE did flip-flop on it. Obama in good faith, got money for saying he would filibuser ANY FISA immunity deal - so it is a lied now he will support it, that is exactly how John Kerry's lost campaign too.
Obama can pull out of this nose dive anything - just by telling us he will vote against the FISA Bill, at least for now anyway and for Christ sack don't think of "center" as okaying ANY of Bush's criminal acts. Jeebus.
July 3, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's position on the FISA bill does not mean much at all to most people. Most people have no clue what FISA means! Some perspective please! No candidate is ever perfect on all issues. The ultimate issues are and will always be the wretched economy, the war and the McCain/Shrub "third term". And McCain is on the wrong side of all the key issues. He offers nothing new; Obama does. Plus there are the issues of appointing new Supreme Court justices, a woman's right to choose, civil rights, the environment...McCain has very little to offer. As pointed out today, if Obama is making states such as Virginia and Montana close at this point and is ahead even in right-wing polls such as Rasmussen, McCain is in real trouble. Finally, Obama has a positive message that connects with people; McCain stumbles horribly and has no positive message at all.
July 3, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he is not going to "refine" his 16-month time table, if any such refinement is off the table, then what is it that might need a necessary refinement.
July 3, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The point was that Obama was really addressing concerns that he would withdraw the troops recklessly and without considering safety and input from the commanders in the field. This contrasts very well with the current adminstration's gross arrogance and inability to admit failure or make changes in their foreign policy. Well, aside from coming up with different reasons/lies for invading Iraq in the first place.
July 3, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right. Does it occur to others that this very intelligent man sometimes ruminates out loud without considering the impact of his words? I have wondered if he tosses out these verbal experiments to see what happens and then "explains" what he really meant. If so, it is a curious characteristic for such a smart (and dare we say it, calculating) man.
July 3, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
My message to Barack Obama would be: take a break, talk less to the media, don't take your front-runner status for granted, reinforce your message more forcefully, chose your words carefully and start launching subtle, but pointed attacks @ McCain.
July 3, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's position on the FISA bill does not mean much at all to most people. Most people have no clue what FISA means! Some perspective please! No candidate is ever perfect on all issues. ...
Posted by dswx
________________
Too weird. As long as the general public is too stupid to figure out that Obama is a veritable whirligig on the issues, we'll all be fine. Of course, WE have to eat some shit, but, to paraphrase quasar, If Obama can eat this much shit, I think we can too.
July 3, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me folks. Obama is not doing anything wrong. What you are witnessing is the same herd instinct of the press to elect a Republican President just like 2000 and 2004. Obama says "refine" and the press leaps up screaming "change policy" and flip flop.
Wesley Clark, a former Hillary supporter not officially with the campaign, repeats the words of Bob Scheiffer and the press fires "Obama campaign" swiftboats McCain.
"Rookie mistakes" says one TPM poster. Folks, Al Gore was on his fourth run at a national ticket office in 2000 when the press defined him as a serial liar who claimed he invented the internet, discovered the Love Canal and a host of other canards.
If Obama had said, in response to a press question, "I am going to Iraq, but nothing I see will change my policy," he would have been savaged by the press. If he hadn't agreed to go to Iraq, he would have been savaged by the press.
Check out the blogs at ABC written by Rick Klein.
If you do not see them as an adjunct arm of the McCain campaign, you are blind. The 14,000 FISA foes wasting time on Obama's website ought to be raising hell with the MSM.
July 3, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ricky, you have summed up the whole situation very succinctly! Many thanks to you!
July 4, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
What Obama is "doing wrong" is not effectively managing the PR aspect of his campaign. As I stated before, the MSM is what it is. And Obama should be savvy enough to know this and to use it to his advantage - certainly, not let it kick him in the ass. As others have said above, this guy's smart. He's demonstrated it over and over again. He's letting his guard down. He's got good people on his campaign. He needs to use the resources at hand to good effect to counteract this BS from the Repub-friendly and profit-driven MSM.
Time for a little Barakakido, yes?
July 4, 2008 9:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right. Does it occur to others that this very intelligent man sometimes ruminates out loud without considering the impact of his words? I have wondered if he tosses out these verbal experiments to see what happens and then "explains" what he really meant. If so, it is a curious characteristic for such a smart (and dare we say it, calculating) man.
Posted by Prysmith
________________
In other words, he's a fool who's bitten off way more than he can chew, but we still love him, and will prechew stuff for him, then give him big platefulls so he never has to think again. At least, it would be nice if we could do that. In the meantime, he's such a nice, smart man. Gosh I wish he would ACT smart.
July 3, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
In his speach, many peaple were moved.
He can make them be absorbed what he speaches.
It is his ability I think.
July 3, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should add, while I'm at it, the MSM were doing it to Hillary as well during the primary. Words coming out of her mouth and Bill Clinton's mouth were defined by the press in ways far different than normal people would have interpreted them had they not been filtered through the media first. Neither Hillary or Bill qualify as "rookies." Obama people laughed, and Hillary people blamed Obama or his supporters. It was the press. Don't curse the candidate. Don't curse the press. Correct them. At their house, not here.
July 3, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's flagging campaign is desperate and quickly wants to take the attention away from them, so what does the campaign do? they release false memo about Barack Obama's Iraq policy, the sponge brain MSM soaks it like its worth being debate -its puts Obama on the defensive, but he was actually on offense. And the media gets their headline, a misleading headline at that. THE MSM ARE BUNCH OF PATHETIC DICKHEADS, THEY OUGHT TO BE REALLY, REALLY ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES.
July 4, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
The withdrawl our troops from won't entail packing a few suitcases and arranging a kennel for the pets. Obama has never inferred it would be, and today simply reiterated the obvious. Make no mistake: the threat of a bloody disaster during the course of the forthcoming retreat will remain a very real one. For the sake of the troops- and, I daresay, for the Iraqi's themselves- it will need be meticulously planned and executed.
July 4, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
His position is certainly correct. But, the way that he is communicating it is opening him to attacks. And any justification for his position later will be rendered less effective, because the public has already been primed by the Repubs and the MSM to hear his arguments through this "He can't be taken at his word" lens.
July 4, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I laughed at the last question too. It was fun to laugh with Barack. We should figure out who that weenie is and take over his blog.
July 4, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was really surprised at the lengths Joe Scarborough went to edit Obama's second statement on the issue of Iraq (Race for the White House). Joe made a point to show a video of Obama's second press statement, but with every statement where Obama reiterated his support for a 16 month withdrawal edited out. Since Rachel Maddow was hammering Scarborough on misrepresenting Obama's position, I can only surmise Joe felt his ego threatened and purposefully distorted the video they aired to omit any reference to continued support for a timed withdrawal.
Then Scarborough showed just how threatened he was by declaring Maddow had the "Hillary cackle down pat."
That's not just ignorance, that's deliberate misrepresentation and misogyny to disguise it.
July 4, 2008 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
They (the GOP) lured Obama out too this so-called "center" BS whereby the Repugs could butchering Obama.
So Josh had to control the messager but refused too. Obama can't go into the "center" shit - it is a NO-MAN land were Obama can't be protected and Republicans fry him.
You know it isn't like Glenn did warn Obama because Glenn did warn him, nobody wanted to listen - Josh just wanted to label Glenn an ultra-liberal - a cheap label.
Does Josh EVER care what the truth is about FISA?
Obama had a choice - say NO to FISA, it really is just that simple. Just let Bush go to jail, because Bush isn't your *ucking friend and he never was a GOOD faith kind of guy. If Obama would ONLY do what is right and not screw everyone over.
AG Gonzales never got this free ride that Josh wants to give Obama. Obama LIED dud, that is WHY we are here now.
July 4, 2008 1:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Joe Scarborough - yeah, they got Obama alright.
This FISA Bill was Obama's undoing - you don't trash fellow Dems and don't go to this capital building narrow view of middle - center. The Repugs played Obama.
Bush LIE about wiretapping and that is NOT some middle view point perspective, never was, it is NOT some middle ground. Obama can't think outside the box of the capital building - Wiretapping is NOT middle ground, never was and NEVER will be, Jeebus - how could Obama be so damn stupid?
Josh ignore that aspect, he really did - did Josh Marshall think this FISA thing would go away, hell no - like I said, it is too BIG for that?
You want Obama to win, so do I, but you don't win by burying your heads and pretend the FISA flip-flop would simply go away.
This center thing, it is a dead mans's zone.
July 4, 2008 2:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
At least we are talking about the issues. The ONE issue McCain thinks is his strength. Media making Obama look like a flip-flopper but we know who the real flip-flopper is and his name is John but not John Kerry.
July 4, 2008 2:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
True. If Obama uses the opportunity effectively. His strength throughout the Primary, and several times since, has been his ability to turn his opponents' attacks against them. Let's see if he can do that again or whether he'll just duck and cover.
July 4, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's been rock solid about this. Get out carefully, 16 mos period. As apposed to I vote for it. See the difference, dumbass.
July 4, 2008 3:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that the press has botched this entirely, but Obama should know how the game is played. McCain has seized the initiative on Iraq by first baiting him into announcing a trip and then saying it wouldn't change his mind. It's a trap designed to make news and put him on the defensive. To win, Obama doesn't need people to believe he is open minded, and he needn't be so defensive about it. Instead he should retake the initiative by saying "The real problem is people like McCain and Bush who have already made up their mind that we should never leave. Unlike the other nations in our "coalition" who have long since departed, nothing seems to change their mind despite mounting evidence that even with the vast expenditures of our blood and treasure, we are not achieving any of our goals using Bush/McCain's so called "strategy."
You get a much better headline the next day if you do that...something like "Obama hits Bush, McCain on Iraq Intransigence"
July 4, 2008 8:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
interesting how he laughed at the last question, but after the response, I wonder if he laughed because he thought the question was redundant. He clearly said "at the rate of 1 to 2 brigades a month, we will have our troops out in 16 months. And that's what I intend to do as President."
So those are pretty strong words, which makes me think that he was fed up with everything.
I think everyone is just afraid of what happened with FISA. Was he ever really that strong with FISA? And what kind of situation did we (aka Pelosi) get ourselves into with FISA. Was the real situation that the telecoms completely bullied by Bush with complicit Democrats involved?
July 4, 2008 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, good job getting the MSM to spend several days parroting rightwing smears.
Let's hope Obama can control the newscycle a little better going forward.
MCcain is tghe flipflopper but no one calls him on it, and the MSM ignores it.
No one is vetting McBush, hot-headed angry little creep.
July 4, 2008 9:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is very simple to deal with the McCain campaign's claim that McCain and Obama now have the same position on Iraq. Simply say that if that is the case they can put together plans to begin withdrawing troops immediately and surely Bush will follow the joint Obama-McCain position.
July 4, 2008 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Following up on the heels of the Wes Clark "scandal" this is just more rightwing disinformation. At this point, all they can do is try and confuse the voters. They certainly can't campaign on their record of accomplishments.
Reality check: it really doesn't matter what Obama says he's going to do re Iraq. The Dems and Repubs in the House & Senate are not going to let him withdraw in 16 months. I guarentee that once we have a Dem president, the Dems in the House & Senate will stymie everything he wants to do. Ironic, huh?
July 4, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry Walrus, but you are the egg man on this. The Dems in the Congress can neither advance or stymie anything.
July 4, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think some of those press people just want to have their voices recorded. How else do you explain the fact that 4 of them asked the same damned question? If I were him I would have said..what is wrong with you people? are you hard of hearing or you just don't understand english, what is it???
Are these the same blowhard, tabloid journalists who sat in the White House briefing room SILENTLY over the past 7 1/2 years and didn't ask anyone in the Bush administration anything of substance?
Why weren't they holding anyones feet to the fire when it was proven sixteen ways to Sunday that we were LIED in to this war and over 4,000 have died and thousands are gravely injured, not to mention the thousands more that are suffering from PTSD with barely any acknowledgment from the government? Where were they with the "tough" questions then?
As Dan Abrams likes to say...just one more reasons Americans hate Washington. I'll take it an extra step...I think, no I pretty much know, that I hate the press more than politicians. It's a close race...but they are vile.
July 4, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Three days ago I would have been certain that people in the media knew what the word refine means. Boy was I wrong. My charitable campaign "Dictionaries for journalists" cannot get started a minute too soon.
July 4, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
You all have a lot fun of intentionally distorting beyond recognition McCain's words about Iraq (e.g. 100 years IF ...), but just let people pick apart Obama's words a little and it isn't so funny, huh?
July 4, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anderson Cooper was trying to hype this yesterday as the 'most dramatic story of the presidential campaign'. I kid you not. They even played the video of his second press conference and even after Obama said he hadn't changed his position, Cooper kept trying to say he flip flopped. Kept harping on the word 'refine' WTF is wrong with these people. It seems to me that this stuff is some form of payback as many in the MSM have been upset with how tight Obama's campaign is keeping control on the information it gives out. They've been complaining for weeks about a lack of access. So now they are just putting McCain's Campaign emails up like they are the gospel truth.
July 5, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, as someone who voted, caucused and contributed to the Obama campaign, I find this disturbing, along with his flip flop on NAFTA. I have no confidence in John McCain, but I begin to believe more every day that Obama is just a man with great speeches, rather than a man of his great speeches. To say this trend is disappointing, is to say the least.
July 5, 2008 7:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Vote for Obama as the lesser of two evils. Take your pick: Leprosy or Plague. Choose the left wing of Corporate governance or the right wing of Corporate governance.
No thank you. My vote is an expression of my political will and I will not cast it in endorsing disease. For others of like mind, I suggest you look first at McKinney, Barr, or even Nader. I don't plan to vote for any of them, however. I will write in the name of a friend I have known for thirty years.
I noticed any number of posters who expressed some variant of the thought: Not many Americans know or care about all the FISA stuff, so it doesn't really matter; it won't be an issue in November. This is sadly true. The 4th Amendment and the rule of law really don't matter much to most Americans. The Constitution and preserving American liberty is just another "issue", like a farm bill, or healthcare plan, or high gas prices, or whatever the hobby-horse of the moment happens to be.
In all likelihood, during this coming week Leprosy and Plague will hollow out the 4th Amendment and poison the rule of law--though it may take some time before it finally expires. In future years, they will move on to other things than no one pays much attention to either: the 1st, 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments, due process, equal protection of the law, judicial review. They, too, will be just "issues" to be trimmed and spun for the convenience of an election season.
We'll be left with some noble words on an old due parchment that no longer have any meaning and can be circumvented at will by our masters.
July 5, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Obama is surprised by the reaction to his Iraq remarks. Well, he better wake up. Anything he says that allows for even the tinest opening for the GOP and Press to find fault or fodder for critism is going to result in negative press. It is simply what they do. He needs to sharpen his game. The General Election is not the same as the primaries. The gloves are off. He, also, better be prepared to take his gloves off. His new kind of politics when it comes to the GOP will get him squashed like a bug.
July 5, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Testing because all comments missing from my page view.
July 6, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would Obama withdraw troops from Iraq? I don't think anybody knows at this point. He's gone back on so many of his positions on other issues that nobody knows for sure what he would do. And that's the point. You can blame the media for making too big a deal about this, but Obama is the one who gave the media license to do it by changing his own motto from "change you can believe in." to "change that depends upon which group of voters he's pandering to."
July 6, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Better the devil you know", eh?
Except in this case, it's not. We know McCain will be in Iraq for as long as he can. He'll set up permanent bases. Hell, he might even invade Iran. He's that crazy, you know.
Obama might be an unknown, but in this case, I'd rather HOPE Obama keeps his word on Iraq than vote for what I KNOW will be more War under McCain.
July 7, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink