« Group Responds To McCain Ad: Britney And McCain Both Heart Bush! | Home | McCain's Obama-Britney Ad Buy May Have Real Money Behind It »
Obama On Britney Spot: "I Don't Pay Attention To John McCain's Ads"
Obama himself responds to McCain's Britney-Paris ad:
"You know, I don't pay attention to John McCain's ads, although I do notice he doesn't seem to have anything to say very positive about himself. He seems to only be talking about me... You need to ask John McCain what he's for and not just what he's against."
Dunno. We'd prefer to hear Obama use the word "childish," or if he prefers, "sophomoric," as senior Obama adviser David Axelrod called the ad today. Hearing Obama himself laugh off the ad as childish or babyish would help ensure that McCain just keeps on shrinkin'...
Late Update: As a commenter notes, "pathetic" would also have worked pretty well.
Advertisement















damnit barack!! where's the fire in your belly?
ugh...just say it's "pathetic." that's all you need to say!
July 30, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that was a Obama style SMACKDOWN!
July 30, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not exactly stinging.
July 30, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I.e., really not a smackdown at all.
The Obama team seems to have adopted Kerry's notion that acknowledging and fighting back against a lie equal dignifying it. Not so.
July 30, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is actually giving the McCain camp good advice.
Let's hope McCain's campaign is too dumb to follow it.
July 30, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I gotcha. It's a good trap too.
July 30, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno, although there are some times I wish Obama would hit back harder, in this particular case I think that's exactly what makes it stinging-- He's not angry, just dismissive. I think this time the response succeeds in making McCain just look small.
July 30, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The whining around here!
Tommy Vietor, Obama Camp via Ben Smith
July 30, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or give them yet another reason to call Obama 'uppity' for laughing at (good ole boy) senator Sprinkles
July 30, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
LEAVE HER ALONE!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHmvkRoEowc
July 30, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I understand why he responds like that, but he needs to get tougher. This people won't stop at nothing to crush him.
July 30, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe they're just warming up but that wasn't an "attack", that ad is a joke
Seems like we've a Nation of Demo Whiners here
July 30, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
"MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, to his credit, pressed Crist at least three times on whether he agrees with the notion that Obama wants to lose the war,
only 3 times?
(Joe Scarborough is MSNBC's Eddie Haskell.)
July 30, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give him a day or so. This will be worked into this stump more seamlessly.
July 30, 2008 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear God.
Here we go again. 2004 all over again. These type of attacks are only effective when the Democrats fail to fight back.
These wimpy responses essentially serve to confirm the content of the ad in the minds of some swing voters.
July 30, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's he supposed to say -- "I'm not really like Paris and Brittany"? I think his response to this particular ad is appropriately above the fray. This is not really a swiftboat-type situation; then nature of the "charge" against the candidate is different here. There is not really any pertinent factual assertion to refute. I say he should stick with meat and potatoes issues like the economy, jobs, alternative energy, etc. and leave the petty crap slinging to McCain. That said, he needs to be sure to respond quickly to these various for-insiders ads from McCain, if only to point out that McCain is not talking about his own plans for the nation but is instead running a campaign right out of Bush's playbook using the very same advisers Bush used.
July 30, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is correct; the press needs to start pinning down McCain on what he stands for. McCain has flip flopped all over the place, for all intents and purposes he is a strawman candidate. McCain's seems to be running on a series of false arguements, you need look no further then his recent ads to figure that out.
July 30, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama shouldn't expect any help from the press, so he needs to take the fight to McCain. A few fact checking ads of his own would be a step in the right direction.
July 30, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
He should just send them to the media and not even air them.
July 30, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Waiting for the press to do its job is not the way to win elections. As the McCain camp has already figured out - the press is a puppet waiting for the strongest hand to be stuck up its butt. Obama has to set the press' agenda, or McCain will. Because Obama has failed to set the agenda, McCain is filling the void with garbage. Obama needs to go on the offensive and knock McCain back a few steps.
July 30, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you on McCain's discovery that the press is a sock puppet (not that this was a "road to Damascus" revelation or anything, Colbert already nailed this at his wonderful White House Correspondent's Dinner speech 2 years ago). But Obama mostly handled himself well in the primaries, so I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt here.
July 30, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hear you, but try to remember back to this morning when the NY Times and the Washingtonpost both called bullshit on McCain.
While this situation surely could have been answered by a "Dr Phil" type joke, maybe telling the press to do its job is the right tack.
July 30, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he could have said, I had no idea John McCain knew who Paris Hilton and Britney Spears were. I thought Betty Grable and Ava Gardner were more his speed.
July 30, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign: on the defense, AGAIN. Knock it off and go after McCain.
Just WTF are they holding back for? If this is how they're going to respond from now until November, that sucks. But it would be consistent: the Obama campaign allowed Clinton to dictate the media narrative as well. Maybe because they were pretty secure in knowing who would get the nomination, but still. To see the same sort of tactics now is disappointing.
I guess I hope that they're just holding fire, waiting for the right moment.
July 30, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
The longer you hold your fire, the greater your chances of getting shot.
July 30, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
And this is the proverbial gun you bring to a knife fight? McCain must be crapping in his Depends.
July 30, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rope-a-Dope?
July 30, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
If so, then one hopes that the early rounds are almost done.
July 30, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
what one would characterize as 'wimpy', others would deem otherwise. There is going to be discontent and criticism with whichever way he chooses to fight back but as long as he is doing something, there will be no hand wringing here.
July 30, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
For some reason, these politicians are adverse to flat out calling a liar a liar. I never understood that.
July 30, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because it looks like whining, no matter how strong your evidence is.
July 30, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama gains nothing in addressing the substance of the ads, not even to dismiss them. However, he manages to get under McCain's skin by pointing out the obvious. The trick is for the media to repeat it or for McCain to respond with anger, which would be sublime. Obama is slapping back, not at the ads, but at McCain himself and on his campaign being based entirely on Obama, not on McCain's merits.
July 30, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm in agreement w/ you and feel that Obama is playing McFuddle against McFuddle here and it is not the right time or issue for an all out attack response from Obama. The GOP hasn't even gotten rolling yet and I feel the worst is ahead of us. he's taking the high ground and letting McFuddle know he isn't taking his bait!
Obama warned us of the shit that was coming and I am feeling his approach is correct here. Obama isn't going to be defending himself against Brittney and Paris.
July 30, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
third the notion. this is one issue he doesn't have to engage, and pivoting into the intellectual bankruptcy of the mcSame campaign can be useful, too.
July 30, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hah. So this is what Huckabee said about how McCain dealt with Obama's Europe trip:
Scratch another name off that veep list.
July 30, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good catch.
Weird to actually agree with Huckabee for once. McCain did seem like that "Where is the outrage?!" Dole of '96.
July 30, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's message this week is about he economy. If the Obama campaign responded to every McCain ad that they put out, then thety will never get their economic message out there.
Aren't some of you guys the same people who said Obama needs to be hitting home his economic message more. Well that is what Obama is trying to do. While McCain is having to respond to the response to his own ads, the campaign can never talk about get it's message out.
If Obama stops to respond to every McCain ad, then doesn't he become McCain. That is how Obama truly beat Clinton early on, because the Obama campaign was good at staying on message. It was once the campaign go off message (neg ads, PA, Rev Wright) that time became dicey.
July 30, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree that this fluff (the uppity nigra ad, I call it) needs a tough response. Kerry was attacked on his strength by a concerted group of rightwing financed liars.
This is flailing spaghetti at the wall type of stuff that only reinforces that McCain can't articulate any clear positions, but can only stamp his little feet at Obama and the media. Bless his heart. That's how this ad comes across and it merits but the yawning dismissal it got from the Obama campaign IMHO.
July 30, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
ANGRY MCCAIN
July 30, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Frustrating. Can we fight back AND stay on the issues? We could potentially kill two birds with one stone there- attack McCain with his horrible record (fair game) and bring back the issues (instead of this celebrity BS).
We can fight back using the candidates records, right? That is considered fair ground for the type of campaign Obama is running, right?
Very dumb we are not on top of fighting and debunking these ads.
A statement from the candidate ISN'T enough.
July 30, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
That said, can we have a thread on Obama's economic message in Missouri?
July 30, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
No then it becomes a matter of having to respond to the response. You would never be able to get ur message out there.
Obama's right. McCain has practically no ads up saying anything about what he will do for America, it's just about Obama, that's not the way to energize your base. I'm betting that most Cons/Repub would rather stay home than fight the "crowds" of enthusiastic Democrats on election day.
Sometimes I think that we all are on the blogs so much that we react to everything as it happens. Well I can tell you that I work in a Hospital lab, with at least 20-25 people. Of those people, only 2 of us are actually paying attention to the campaigns right now (I'm one of the 2).
These ads work for those pol fanatics right now. I just don't envision some undecided voter who is truly undecided, and not just "looking for an excuse" who will be bombarded with McCain's neg ads will feel enthused to vote. If anything they don't make you "happy" to be a republican or independant.
July 30, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
You guys need to stop with the hand-wringing. Obama gave a smart initial response, and I'm sure we'll be seeing more on this line of attack in the coming days.
July 30, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama calling the adds "childish" would also have been an insult, and right now he dosn't need to engage in that kind of thing, especially since plenty of people are willing to do it themselves. :)
Obama, frankly, dosn't need to engage McCain at his level at this point in time, and if he can avoid it, good for him. Just like Clinton vs Dole in '96. Clinton took the high road even when Dole bashed him, and he came up smelling like roses.
July 30, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lot of Arm-Chair Candidates today....
July 30, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
All of them handwringing.
July 30, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure what everybody is complaining about. I think this is an absolutely dignified response from Obama that doesn't even give ANY of McCain's ads any credit.
He's basically saying he is too invovled in trying to become President to pay attention to this nonsense.
I happen to like his response a lot. It's dismissive as opposed to opening the debate.
July 30, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll take the minority position here- Obama's response was pitch-perfect. it was curtly dismissive, and it neatly made the essential point that McSame has nothing positive to offer.
Behaving in as juvenile a fashion as McSame would be a mistake. Don't mud-wrestle with pigs- you only get dirty and the pig enjoys it. "I do notice he doesn't seem to have anything to say very positive about himself" hits just the right note.
This kind of attack coming directly from the McSame campaign, I would also think, is likely to be significantly less effective with the targeted swing voters than a true "swiftboat" attack by a seemingly "independent" surrogate. Voters tend to discount campaign rhetoric as just the kind of thing politicians say, but as in 2004 the dumber ones can be fooled into thinking that reasonably clever surrogates really offer independent, credible information.
July 30, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree 100%. Barack sounded like the adult here, and McCain like a little kid throwing a tantrum.
July 30, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Part of me thinks Obama's just being cautious, letting his boys roll out the tougher talk. There's plenty of time for him to ridicule Walnuts in the future.
Another part of me is saying, "Come on, Barack! What happened to bringing the gun to the knife fight??"
July 30, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That said, the "Oops he did it again" was pretty spot on.
July 30, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry but people are stupid and they are going to eat these ads up.
McCain's record is horrible, televising it can only be a good thing for Obama- so let's get on it!!
July 30, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCains people really hit the nail on the head. Obama really does come off as a egomaniac smooth talking empty suit cult leader. The Superdelagates still have time to dump him and go with Hillary.
July 30, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
And you come off as an exceptionally stupid troll.
July 30, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's vintage Dem Bill C...
July 30, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK...false start
remember everyone, obama needs to maintain a certain jackie robinson coolness and high-mindedness. the last thing he needs is an 'angry black man' thing starting up among the chattering class.
i actually think the best response for something like this is something that throws the angry curmudgeon thing onto mccain while pointing out his hypocrisy and hopelessness
how's this for a try...
"john mccain is becoming more and more angry. what i find it puzzling the reason he is so angry isn't the because his party and presidnet have driven this country into a ditch but the fact that i'm offering americans the opportuntiy to work together to get out of it."
July 30, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
There really is a lot of hand-wringing over this. I think these ads by McCain are clearly childish and pathetic and McCain's response was perfect. There is no need for him to sink to McCain's level. That's exactly what McCain wants so he can hammer him over his "new politics" hypocrisy.
July 30, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's response was perfect, obviously.
July 30, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I assume you meant Obama's response. And I totally agree.
July 30, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama wants to take the high road, that's fine, as long as he has a surrogate or two that will bring a gun to the fight. As Greg said, "pathetic" has a nice ring to it.
Gore, Kerry and now Obama are all adults, and act as such but the game is played at the high school, and even middle school level, as Karl Rove knows well.
Obama needs someone who is smart and funny who can lob barbs, al la Ann Richards.
July 30, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, yes and yes. Obama's response "I don't pay attention to John McCain" was perfect (undertones of "you bore me, John"), but we need more of Axelrod or Gibbs out there, attacking McCain.
This is the media that wrote about how comedians were finding it difficult to make jokes about Obama, and then concluded, based on that, that it was Obama who lacks a sense of humor. Really lame. So it (the media) must not be left to its own devices at any time.
July 30, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama wants to take the high road, that's fine, as long as he has a surrogate or two that will bring a gun to the fight. As Greg said, "pathetic" has a nice ring to it.
Gore, Kerry and now Obama are all adults, and act as such but the game is played at the high school, and even middle school level, as Karl Rove knows well.
Obama needs someone who is smart and funny who can lob barbs, al la Ann Richards.
July 30, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Joe Biden
July 30, 2008 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
EXACTLY.
July 30, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's vintage 'No Drama Obama.'
No need to look pissed off, no need to engage McCain's schoolyard taunts. Brush it off while pointing out that McCain is giving voters exactly zero vision for where he wants to take the country if elected.
Believe me, chairs are flying at McCain HQ right now because The Biggest Celebrity In The World refuses to take their stinky bait. It's gotta be driving them nuts.
July 30, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I likes it - No drama Obama.
That's good.
July 30, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's with everyone losing their shit over this ad? It's HORRIBLE. It doesn't even make any sense. There's so many mixes messages it's impossible to even respond to it.
I mean, seriously, all of you people saying this is going to resonate throughout the electorate -- have you WATCHED THE AD? Play it over and over on the nightly news -- all it's going to do is confuse the shit out of people.
This is the logic of the ad in my mind: Obama is really popular (just like Britney Spears) but he doesn't want to drill for oil off the coast of Florida. In conclusion, TAXES and TERRORISTS! Also, John McCain.
Relax. The ad SUCKS.
July 30, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way - while we're here pre-occupied by Britney and whether Obama is Kerry II, O was getting it done in Missouri.
Y'all are sweating the small stuff too much.
July 30, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Barack is responding in Missouri:
"The republicans run the same ad every four years, they only change the name..."
He's focusing on the economy.
Stay tuned.
July 30, 2008 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only does the ad suck but only an out of touch old man wouldn't realize that Brittney is so NOT popular!! No one goes to see her, she doesn't perform concerts any more!! Just ask any young person! And the ad is idiotic and nonsensical. It might preach to the choir but even an ordinary moron would be able to see through it.
July 30, 2008 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I concur. Don't dignify this crap. Barack is better than that. That said, surrogates: fire away at the petulant middle school-nature of the McCain campaign. It is entertainingly pathetic.
July 30, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Via the Daily Dish
McCain's new anti-Obama ad has pushed former McCain strategist John Weaver over the edge:
"John's been a celebrity ever since he was shot down," Weaver said. "Whatever that means. And I recall Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush going overseas and all those waving American flags...For McCain to win in such troubled times, he needs to begin telling the American people how he intends to lead us. That McCain exists. He can inspire the country to greatness...There is legitimate mockery of a political campaign now, and it isn't at Obama's. For McCain's sake, this tomfoolery needs to stop."
July 30, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
More good advice that I hope McCain's brain trust ignores.
July 30, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is killing at the Rolla town hall right now.
July 30, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I think this kills sufficiently.
They may have tested this ad, but I'd sure like to see that test group, cause I have a mental picture...
This is so damn junior high.
July 30, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most of the comments about Obama's "inadequate" response to this stupid, pitiful, embarrassing ad are from a net-based POV - you're just reading the words off a screen, and they come off a little bit dry. If you see Obama's response on cable, as I just did, it comes across 1000 percent better. He's relaxed, smiling, and he says it all practically over his shoulder as he's entering his bus at the end of an event. It's an ultra-genial dismissal, and again, what comes through is that McCain has nothing, nothing to offer except carping and bullshit.
July 30, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you so much for that.
The nervous nellies are really twisting their pearls this week and Jesus! Every bit of this bullshit is the GOP frantically trying to push back against the absolutely brilliant week Obama had last week.
July 30, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe you're right, maybe you're not. This election is so different, given the 24/7 news channels, blogs, social network sites. The way this campaign is handed, minute by minute, without time to breathe and focus (something shows up constantly, even if is not news at all, like this ad).
I saw part of the town hall and he's doing quite well, focusing on the economy, the most important issue today. He's sticking to avoid falling into the mud fight that the GOP wants.
But I do share other people worries that he should answer more strongly, but being smart at the same time, like that gas ad response yesterday.
Let's wait and see.
July 30, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me - I hate to deflate you like this - but where were you in 2004 and 2006? I was online, myself, more than I am now, actually.
This is hardly the first election with the circumstances you describe. I've been through 2 and that's why I don't get excited every fucking second that there is a reaction to an action or whatever.
July 30, 2008 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
New CNN poll: 40 % of respondents think John McCain attacked unfairly; only 22% think Barack Obama attacked unfairly. I suspect this dynamic will continue and worsen for McCain.
37 % think Barack Obama is arrogant; 34 % think McCain is arrogant. A majority (60% I think) thought Obama's trip abroad was appropriate. It didn't change perceptions however. McCain cleans up on foreign affairs issues; Obama on domestic issues.
Overall: Obama 51 McCain 44
July 30, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Attacked unfairly, or attacks unfairly.
July 30, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
He crossed the 50% mark.
That's good news!
July 30, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Definitely.
My favorite part, given the offshore drilling inanity:
"–Which candidate would better handle gas prices: Obama 51, McCain 30"
http://thepage.time.com/more-on-cnnopinion-research-corp-poll/
July 30, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Attacked unfairly, or attacks unfairly.
July 30, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Attacked.
July 30, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay. One more time, haha.
40% think McCain "has been attacked" unfairly or "has attacked" unfairly?
July 30, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has attacked.
July 30, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has attacked.
July 30, 2008 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay. Thanks. I blame the heat.
July 30, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's see if the Obama campaign can hit back.
July 30, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Britney Spears ad is just stupid IMO.
However, I do want to see a strong Obama ad that says that it is too risky NOT TO CHANGE and show McCain hugging Bush.
July 30, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed it is. The McBush camp is so clueless that they are pathetically making a comparison...to two *Republican* skanks?! That speaks volumes about their own constituency. Wow, they are getting more desperate every day.
July 30, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should just look sad for a sec, the next time he's asked about it and other attack ads, and then say, with complete sincerity and truthfulness: "John McCain needs to get a political life of his own. He can't win an election by simply attacking me constantly. He has to stand up for something and let people know what he is for and let the voters decide on real issues, not name-calling."
July 30, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
This too from Marc Ambinder at the Atlantic:
John Weaver, "one of John McCain's closest friends and confidants" described the ad as "childish." He went on to say: "There is legitimate mockery of a political campaign now, and it isn't at Obama's. For McCain's sake, this tomfoolery needs to stop."
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/weaver_mccains_former_strategi.php
July 30, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give him a day. He probably hadn't even seen the ad yet.
Face it, folks - the guy is pretty even-tempered, and he's selling a new brand of politics. He can't violate that because you guys want to see him sink to McCain's level. Calling it "childish" or "pathetic" would've ensured, 100%, that that would've been the only word anyone remembered from his comments. As such, what they take away is the the substance - that McCain is spending all his time talking about Obama and not trumpeting his own credentials.
July 30, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what I would've said:
"I find it puzzling that John McCain seems to be getting more and more angry about me and my campaign...and the poor public schools, judicial hubris, warmongering and fiscal irresponsibility we've seen under President Bush's administration have barely caused him to lift a finger in protest. Sure, a statement here or there, designed to distance himself from Bush may be politically advantageous. But if John McCain is so insistent upon dealing in reality, let's do so - he has voted consistently to support George Bush, and seeks to continue a great majority of the same policies as President.
Where's the leadership in that?"
July 30, 2008 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anything over aggressive will play into McCains "Angry black man" rhetoric.
You guys need to understand, that Barack, as many other black men that have gotten anywhere in their life, realize that they do not need to say the first fire-roasting thought that appears out of their brains when someone is talking about them. Good or bad.
I for one just want Obama to keep doing what he is doing.
And this isnt 2004 again. Kerry had nothing to him compared to Obama.
I believe/hope this election will be won on the ground. Not with stupid advertisements that everyone from the MSM and Blogosphere seems to get trapped in to writing about.
July 30, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. He needs to keep his campaign out of the gutter, and keep pointing it out when McCain takes his campaign there. I thought Obama's off the cuff response was perfect, particularly "...he doesn't seem to have anything to say very positive about himself..." Ouch!
It doesn't mean that he shouldn't respond quickly and--when necessary--forcefully to McCain's bullying (which is exactly what it is) but he has to keep it sufficiently respectful or else he runs the risk of the "Obama was mean to a war hero" meme.
July 30, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Translation of Obama's remarks:
"I paid no attention at all to the 2004 campaign and am determined to repeat John Kerry's mistakes. I will act like I am above it all while the Republicans destroy my reputation and make me look like an impotent woos who can't relate to the average person and who would much rather hob nob with the elite than pay any attention to the problems of the littel people. In fact, I would suggest that I'm prepared to go ahead and concede now instead of putting the country through the same trauma it experienced 4 years ago while Kerry gave away the Presidency to the most corrupt, incompetent tyrant ever to hold the office of President."
July 30, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink