« McCain's Town Hall: Giggles, Crocs | Home | Top Republican Concedes They Are Likely To Lose Key House Seat »

McAuliffe Hosting Unity Event For Obama

Terry McAuliffe was obviously one of Hillary's most aggressive and high-profile advocates during the primary, but now McAuliffe is really doing his part to help Obama get elected.

We hear McAuliffe will be the main attraction at a unity event for Obama this Thursday, along with Rep. Artur Davis, a top Obama supporter. A source forwards us the invite...

The event is meant to get lawyers and other young professionals who backed Hillary to swing behind Obama -- it's being organized by a bunch of pro-Hillary groups, such as Young Lawyers for Hillary and Young Professionals for Hillary.

Separately, today's Chicago Sun Times caught a glimpse of McAuliffe in Aspen, where he went out of his way to reassure a table-full of Obama supporters: ''We're all on the same team now! This election is too important.''

Just think: Terry McAuliffe, transformed into a lean, mean, unity machine...


55 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I feel about Terry McAuliffe the same way that I used to feel about Deion Saunders. When he was playing for the Cowboys, he was a colossal jerk.

When he played for the Niners? He was an outstanding addition to the team.

user-pic

I'm sure a lot of folks will agree with you on this one...

user-pic

Not me. McAuliffe went so far off the deep end during the primaries and sounded so disconnected from reality that it was clear to all who would watch that he's just a party hack.

Now, behind-the-scenes, in fundraisers, great. But one of the enormous benefits of Clinton not being the nominee is not having to see McAuliffe on TV.

user-pic

I though Terry was a colossal jerk in 2004 and I still think so.

But now he's OUR jerk.

Terry was a jerk and still is a jerk.

After his performance as a Hillary surrogate, Terry has absolutely zero credibility...He's the Baghdad bob for American politics and better someone has a eye on him.

No, no, you got it backwards. Deion was a jerk when he was with the Niners, and became a dazzling hero when he put on the Blue Star.

McAuliffe is nowhere near that league.

user-pic

I heard McAuliffe on CNN recently, talking about the question of if/when Bill Clinton might get out to campaign for Obama. Terry said something along the lines of: "Is there some animosity there? Sure there is! Were some things said during the campaign that shouldn't have been said? Sure there were! The sexist comments, the charges of playing the race card--but hey, we're not talking about that anymore. We've moved on."

Sure ya have, Terry!

Well, at least when he was a 'Niner you could have spelled his name right (it's Sanders, not Saunders).

[/pedantry]

Personally, I don't buy the comparison. Sanders, while a jerk, was at least, you know, good at football.

whatever you want to say about terry mcauliffe, nobody can deny that the guy is hilarious, doesn't take himself too seriously, and is always laughing, even when he lies through his teeth.

user-pic

I agree. He doesn't have the best judgement (e.g. introducing Hillary Clinton as the next President after Obama won the elected delegates...), but he sure has a lot of energy, and I really think he means well. He's certainly not evil, like Penn.

user-pic

Terry McAuliffe and the struggle for actual relavence and future employment . . .

The crass but methinks more honest word for what he's doing is "suck," Mr. Adlof.

user-pic

But what kind of juice does he have with Bill?

Better to have him inside the big tent, pissing out,rather than outside the tent, pissing in.

True dat.

Couldn't have said it better myself if my name was Lyndon.

Exactly.

Agreed. Completely.

Will Howard Wolfenson be there too.

So what happened to all the people who were shouting and moaning a month or two ago about Hillary's monstrous, selfish, irredeemably divisive campaign?

Anyone going to take their lumps and admit that they got a little hysterical in May?

I'd say that Hillary, and many of her main supporters, have shown a lot of class over the last month or two. I didn't like the campaign they ran -- but they deserve a bit of credit at this point. I'm glad that Greg is (implicitly) giving them some. I'd also like to assign a bit of homework to the people who were jumping up and down, posting three blogs a day about the Monstrous Woman Who Never Sleeps, and her World-Destroying Plan.

Go read Charles Mackay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. Then re-read it in October. And read it again next February, when Obama actually starts to govern. It'll save us all a lot of time.

That is what happens in primaries. If Senator Clinton had won, you would be seen the same thing happening from the Obama side. Time to stop nursing your old grudges. The only purpose that serves now is to create more PUMA chow.

user-pic

Are you looking for me to celebrate that HRC did not shatter the party?

Why am I still left with the feeling that Chelsea bitch-slapped her mother for spending her inheritance?

Of course, the Pols have bropped behind their next potential paycheck. This converstaion isn't even worth the electrons it is written in . . .

So what happened to all the people who were shouting and moaning a month or two ago about Hillary's monstrous, selfish, irredeemably divisive campaign? Anyone going to take their lumps and admit that they got a little hysterical in May?

Why the hell are you getting yeppie in July? By the way, be on the lookout for ads in Sep/Oct, audio visuals of Hillary slamming Obama. If you don't think Hillary hasn't hurt democratic party or the party's candidate by her tactics in the primary you need to re-calibrate your intelligenc.

Terry is James Carville with better hair and a vocabulary. Both will go to the ends of the earth to support their candidate. I just hope he recognizes the candidate is Barack, not Bill!

...And can I just take a moment to recognize the passing of Jessie Helms? He was a hell of a man and lets hope he makes it their!

user-pic

Helms will not be missed.

user-pic

Boy, I hope you meant that Helms stuff as a joke. That guy was a bigot with a capital B and had the requisite mean, small mind that's required for such a brilliant perspective. These old poops only start to come around at all because they start wondering if maybe hell is for real as they get close to their deathbeds.

user-pic

Terry McAuliffe is enormously wealthy, so I doubt he struggles too much with future employment issues.

It is odd that so many Netrooters think enthusiastic support for one's candidate (such as that McAuliffe regularly displayed for Hillary) is somehow unseemly.

TMac is a great Dem. He will bring tremendous energy and value to the Obama campaign. We are lucky to have him.

Well, I agree in theory although as a Cowboy fan, the analogy is backwards. Deion was a great receiver. The question was how much did his antics pull down the whole effort? And in this case, how much credibility did Terry lose going through the primary? Keep in mind the target audience is fence sitters and not people who are already on board.

Terry McAuliffe is looking out for his own self interest. He has shown irrational behavior during the primary. I don't understand why Sen Obama would want to associate with him and his style of slime politics.

I think guys like Terry McAuliffe give politics a bad name. Either he didn't believe all the stuff he was saying as a Clinton supporter or he doesn't believe all the stuff he'll be saying as an Obama supporter. Same for Carville, Lanny Davis, and the rest.

It reminds me of the fallout in 2000. There I was, screaming at the TV every night throughout November and December as our side was shouting about the injustice of it all. Then when it was all over, the politicians and their hangers on were back to smiles.

I don't want a doctor telling me I need surgery if she doesn't think I do, and I don't want a politician telling me what to believe if he doesn't believe it, too.

user-pic

Geez, y'all are grumpy. Why not have an effective advocate help out the Obama campaign? Sure, a lot of people here might thing Terry was just plain batty during the primaries, but I'd rather have him working for Obama than sitting on the sidelines.

If Terry weren't doing this, the Hillary supporters out there might be very disturbed by that.

Terry is an extremely effective douchebag.

I have to admit that I'm disappointed that Obama would accept the support of McAuliffe. He's among a handful of Clinton surrogates - Lanny Davis, Mark Penn and Howard Wolfson are the others - that I've absolutely come to loathe.

One of my primary attractions to Obama has been his promise of change, and McAuliffe represents the antithesis of that promise.

Since the pictures surfaced a few months ago of McCauliffe holding an Obama poster, I have suspected he was really a closet Obamanite, just extremely loyal to the Clintons and that explains some of his over-the-topness.

I don't particularly like Baghdad Terry but I think he is a plus rather than a minus overall. (pissing analogy=perfect) There are a few Clinontites I would draw the line at though. (Lanny, Ickes to name a few)

I hearts me some T-Mac :) He's entertaining if nothing else and never seems mean-spirited. Obama's lucky to have him aboard the Unity Train.

user-pic

Knew I'd find you on a Clinton-related thread! I agree completely--McAuliffe hasn't been mean-spirited. Of all the campaign folks, you know he'd been the one you'd want to have a beer--no, margarita--with. I certainly don't agree with all his judgments, but he seems like a very nice guy and faithful friend. I'm glad he's a Democrat and not a Republican--he's a force of nature.

You know just where to find me :) hee hee


Since I supported Edwards and nobody else, I can honestly say that I don't have those stupid and counterproductive prejudices you people seem to have against Hillary and her supporters. I do find it very churlish that you are still spouting them now. We need to all be together in November, or we will be seeing a President McCain continue with his march to destroy American democracy. Get real you people.


If McAuliffe used to be a crazy dirty Hillary supporter, he'll now be a crazy dirty Obama supporter. And in the face of all the crazy dirty right-wing nuts, we need people like him badly!

Obama won't let any supporters fight crazy dirty, that was a lot of what separated his campaign from HRC's, regardless of what some of her crazed fans may have thought. I'm willing to have McAuliffe on the team so long as he does no harm. At least he isn't sleeping with the enemy like Carville.

There's only one reason TMac and any other HRC advisors are on Team Obama . . .

It's campaign money paybacks from Obama to HRC, in one form or another . . .

And so far, their advice that Obama seems to be taking, to go centrist, is bad, real, real bad . . .

This shoulda been a cakewalk (notwithstanding what Rovian Machine will spin) with Obama and a good liberal VP.

The failed wars in both Afghan and Iraq are #1.
The economy is #2.

Private rights for citizens (FISA) and for women (Roe and SCOTUS) are #3.

That's enough to win in a landslide . . . and now, it's being squandared for triangulated appeasement to a voter base that don't much matter . . .

Obama had this country in the palm of his hands . . . and he let it drizzle thru. He deserted his base . . .

Foolish.

HRC musta had him and the DNCC by some leverage we'll never know . . . The DNC, and The Shilary Machine have denuded all that Obama had built up thru HARD WORK and COMMITMENT!

Still, if he wins, we don't REALLY know how he'll govern, or who he'll appoint for cabinet slots . . . . or SCOTUS.

We can only hope.

Terry McAuliffe did a tremendous job as a cheerleader for Hillary Clinton. He did what he was paid to do and earned his money. He may have been a true believer. As a diehard Obama supporter, I was often at odds with him, but he should not be condemned and in fact should be commended for his role in Hillary's campaign. He was loyal to her. But, in the end, he is a Democrat and he will fully embrace Obama and do whatever it takes to ensure that he is the next president of the United States. If you've never been involved in a hotly contested campaign, you can't imagine what an emotional roller coaster it is. I've been there. Sometimes on the losing side. But at some point, you have to come back to your core beliefs and support your party's winning candidate. It is far better than the alternative. Give Terry a break and welcome him aboard the Obama express.

Hillary Clinton has been ordered by the DNC to join forces with Barack Obama. It seems to me she is complying. It is not productive to attack "all things Hillary." It is whiny and suggests a lack of confidence in the Dem's ability to win back the White House. It seems petty, and perhaps Republican leaning, to write off the 18 million supporters of Hillary Clinton.

donnad
You Hillary worshipers are really getting to be a real fringe group. PUMA being whipped-up by false "facts" that are totally crazy. Don't you people realize that the rethuglicans are stoking these fires. Let go of the paranoid drama, please. There is too much at stake to risk another 4 years of the travesty that this country has endured. And another thing, what do you people want? For Obama to be rejected and Hillary crowned? Not going to happen, never in a million years. How are you being written off anyway?
We want to unite and win. Do you really think she would have a snowballs chance in hell to win in 2012 if McSame is elected because of the divisive campaign of Hillary Clinton. Take off your Hillary Goggles.

This makes absolutely no sense at all.

Bill Clinton is the former friggin President. Do you really think that he takes orders from Howard Dean or Harry Reid???? Not in this lifetime.

Bill and Hillary are supporting Obama because they agree with him on 99% of the issues and they know McCain and the Republicans are cancers on this country and will send us into 3rd worldom if elected again.

Go to school. Learn something.

Meanwhile, also back at Camp Hillary...
Wolfson has signed on with Fox.

Lanny didn't surprise me (cough HACK cough ) but this does a bit.
Now that I think of it, I guess it is good if Fox gets more dems on board as long as they don't become Faux News zombies. I think that Fox has read the writing on the wall - the Repub base is shrinking, people know Fox news is a Repub propaganda machine so their ratings will shrink along with the # of republicans. Rupert Murdoch will always be a biased sob but I suppose they need to appear to be more balanced.

Still yellow journalism but maybe a little lighter shade of yellow.

I'm glad Terry Mac is rasing funds for Obama. He's a good Democrat. The biggest laughs I had here at TPM were some of those TPMtv's about McAuliff. I'd rather he was on the Unity Bus than not, unlike Wolfson or Lanny Davis who have signed on with Fox.

I will begin to fear if Obama brings on Penn.

Why the hell are you getting yeppie in July? By the way, be on the lookout for ads in Sep/Oct, audio visuals of Hillary slamming Obama. If you don't think Hillary hasn't hurt democratic party or the party's candidate by her tactics in the primary you need to re-calibrate your intelligenc.

Posted by kash79
==================

What's hurt the democratic party is Obama. You guys better check out Bob Herbert's column in the Times. Decent guy mislead, like all of you (oh, except for the righties here) by this slickster. And Herbert may represent a crack in the fantastical unity of the AA constituency. That, of course, needs to happen, since it is based on a dream, certainly one worth having, but as Herbert points out, one from which reasonable people must awake.

user-pic

You misconstrue the significance of McCaulife and the ultimate immateriality of what folks like Herbert write. Herbert, like so many other star-struck members of the elite media corps, now wishes to make amends and is once again trying to show that he is genuine--by unfairly blasting Obama because Obama is doing what he has to do to win a general election. But Mr. Herbert, like many of us who find fault in some of Senator Obama's recent electoral-based decisions, will vote for Senator Obama no matter what.

Nobody should be surprised by what Senator Obama is doing--he is not the first person to run for president, but he is one of the first Democrats in recent memory, other than Bill Clinton, who right now looks like he's going to do what it takes to win. In that vein, McCaulife and his formerly filthy rich Democratic bundlers don't look so bad after all to the purists who pilloried their brothers and sisters during the primaries for having the audacity to support Senator Hillary Clinton and her "politics of old".

The more things change the more they stay the same. And, in this case, thank heavens for that, and not only because it gives this old-time and unapolagetic pragmatic hack a reason to chuckle.

The more things change the more they stay the same. And, in this case, thank heavens for that, and not only because it gives this old-time and unapolagetic pragmatic hack a reason to chuckle.

Ah yes, pragmatism: the Machiavellian lubricant for the conscience of every tyrant. A little dab'll soothe a whole rack of qualms.

Whenever I feel as though I might want to vote for Obama, his supporters talk me out of it. He's heading up a movement I'd rather not be associated with.

That's funny, I was all set to support Hillary Clinton but her supporters made it impossible.

What kind of movement would that be? As a volunteer for BHO in the Ky primary, I was more impressed by the people who came through our door and called to offer support than any other campaign I've worked for - and this is in Kentucky!

Will this finally get the PUMA's to shut the heck up?

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address