« Top GOP Rep: Obama's Turnout Could Sink Us In The South | Home | Obama Accepts Jackson's Apology -- And Stands By His Statements On Personal Morality »

Lieberman On Questioning Obama's Commitment To Israel: "Why Wouldn't I Do That?"

Oh, dear. Joe Lieberman's latest attack on Barack Obama is a real doozy:

When asked about concerns he is creating the impression that Obama would not be a friend to Israel, Lieberman responded: "It's my way of thinking that if I've concluded, as I have, that John McCain is best for our country, then why wouldn't I do that?"

That seems like a pretty straight-up admission by Lieberman that his Obama's-bad-for-Israel nonsense is pure propaganda designed to help McCain. Or maybe we're missing something?


81 Comments

| Leave a comment

It's worse than that. He is admitting that he really, truly doesn't see any difference between the interests of Israel and the interests of the United States. They are one in the same, indivisable, to him. What's good for one is good for the other. What's bad for one is bad for the other. It's not just a left wing taunt anymore. It's true. He doesn't.

I'd have to say that in the entire article I didn't see Lieberman saying anything except that he thinks McCain will protect Israeli interests better and he intends to keep saying so. If you don't care about Israeli interests, blow Lieberman off. Greg has really been sucking up to the echo chamber lately. Lieberman has a right to side with McCain on international and defense issues just as he sides with Obama and other Democrats on domestic issues. In the final analysis, Israel is a Jewish voter issue. Neither I nor anyone else who isn't Jewish can really understand what Israel means to Jews. Let the Jewish voters and politicians work it out.

It's time someone calls on the patriotism of this scum bag.

Not to be cliquish, but Israelis like me can't stand American Jews like Leiberman.

Israelis like me can't stand American Jews like Leiberman.
That's because he's a supporter of Schmisrael, a country that doesn't exist, but calls it by the name of a country that does.
user-pic

WELL PLAYED, MR. LIEBERMAN. WELL PLAYED.

No! Please don't paint all American Jews with the same brush! >0

as an american jew, that is extremely refreshing to hear.

also, i think that narrows down the people who actually like lieberman to connecticut republicans.

user-pic

The other parsing of LIEberman's comment lead one to ask which country he thinks he means when he say "best for our country."

Now I happen to think Obama and real peace is best for both Israel and the U.S.

But LIEberman is a U.S. Senator (I'm just a guy), so the question of which country he means by "our country" is a legit. question.

Jews like me and even Klein at Time want to know.

I think what he's trying to say is that he's decided to support McCain for president. If he's done so, why wouldn't he question McCain's opposition?

I won't get into how moronic his initial or related decisions on which "side" to take are, but I think that's what he's getting at. 'I'm supporting McCain; McCain's opponent is Obama; why wouldn't I challenge Obama?'

no shit, sherlock. the problem is, is that LIEberman is making false claims about Obama's commitment to Israel. He's not merely saying he agrees with McCain. I thought that much was obvious. It's said, though, because while some folks manipulate the jewish vote for economic gain, i'll wager Lieberman probably believes his own bullshit.

I have trouble picturing anyone thinking of themselves, in their own head, as the "bad guy." That's just not how the human psyche works. Everyone thinks of their own point of view as being the "right one." So yes, I suspect that Lieberman has convinced himself that the end justifies the means in regards to his attacks on Obama.

There's no need for hostility, btw. My comment was designed as a response to Greg's no-doubt mostly rhetorical question about whether he was missing something. I don't think I'm offering any great revelatory opinion here. So chill. We're on the same team. :)

Cheers.

That is *NOT* what he said, though I am sure he would appreciate your inventing ideas for him.

The bloggers' post on this is correct: What he says is (1) that he likes McCain better. For that single reason, (2) it is natural that he attack Obama's commitment to Israel of all places. It is simple, logical non-sequitur on the one hand, and an open admission of venality on the other. Full stop.

In terms of what he is "getting at", the above is where he got to.

I'm not really sure what your point is. You say that's not what he said, and then:

"What he says is (1) that he likes McCain better. For that single reason, (2) it is natural that he attack Obama's commitment to Israel of all places. It is simple, logical non-sequitur on the one hand, and an open admission of venality on the other. Full stop."

That's what I just said. We're not in any disagreement. We're not in any disagreement on how small or stupid that is either.

?

Contrary to popular belief, it IS possible to build your candidate up without tearing your opponent down....

Hehe, not when you're someone like McCain running against someone like Barack. As has been said quite a bit already, this election is all about Obama - it's his to lose. Barring some freakish disaster or gaffe, the Repubs know they're going to get creamed. It's almost sad, but not really. :)

So Lieberman admits he's slander Obama any way he can as long as it helps McCain, truth be damned?

He's playing the Dems for fools. He knows his political career is over if Obama wins, so he's trying to help McCain win by any means necessary and the Dems can't get rid of him because then McCain and Co will make political hay saying how can Obama be bipartisan if he can't even take criticism from a fellow democrat.

Jonze: "So Lieberman admits he'll slander Obama any way he can as long as it helps McCain, truth be damned?"

Yes. That's exactly what he acknowledged. Don't let anybody tell you different.

That seems like a pretty straight-up admission by Lieberman that his Obama's-bad-for-Israel nonsense is pure propaganda designed to help McCain.

That sums it up. Lieberman could have said he believes McCain would be better for Israel without engaging in character assassination and saying Obama would be BAD for Israel. Mounting baseless attacks on the Democratic candidate is evidently Lieberman's brand of bipartisanship.

Joe Lieberman harms Israel's interests by saying that because Israel is strongest when American speaks with one voice of unequivocal support.

The man is slime.

user-pic

As a human and a Hebrew, I have come to precisely the opposite conclusion to Lieberman . . .

I am happier than ever that I signed the petition at liebermanmustgo.com.

user-pic

Come on now, people.

Joe is in a tough contest.

It's not easy to outsuck Huckleberry.
~

when joezoe tortureman says "our country", is anybody sure joezoe is referring to America

I'm still wondering how the Gore campaign thought he'd be a good VP. He's just being flat out clumsy here.

He wanted to show he was seperate from Clinton as Lieberman was a critic of Clinton.

True, he wasn't the only Democrat critical of Clinton, though. I suppose they also thought a Jewish American VP would get them Florida easily. Seems like a warning to any future candidate who considers a VP based solely on political expediency, rather than their individual strength as a politician or their compatibility.

well put. but remember, gore/lieberman DID win florida!

user-pic

The margin of victory in Florida was smaller than the margin of error for the vote tabulation so anyone who claims to know who won is is either mistaken or lying.

i'd say gore/lieberman won based on the number of people improperly removed from the voting rolls as felons, and the likelihood, based on demographics, that a disproportionate number of those people would have voted Democratic.

Yet both Clinton and Obama supported Lieberman against Lamont, and Lieberman still stabbed them both in the back.

/ Judas

user-pic

Once again people are wasting precious minutes of their lives discussing Joe Lieberman. How sad!

Considering how lousy this day has already been, I think most people here can afford a few more minutes of kvetching about someone who really deserves as much ridicule and scorn as we can dish out.

I hate Lieberman. I can't wait until the elections when he can be safely booted out as a traitor, sell-out and a grimacing bafoon.

user-pic

That will be sweet day. He'll be at the margins somewhere, going, "Where'd everybody go?"

It is well past time to be free to slam Israel as thuggish without being accused of anti-semitism. Lieberman doesn't get that.

As the former girlfriend of a Jewish Republican Zionist, I can tell you that Lieberman is pretty popular with them; and he's pretty indistinguishable from them, as many of them are moderates otherwise. Israel is a blindspot. Thinking and reasonableness on other issues go completely out the window on this issue. Otherwise sane people who happen to be Jewish foam at the mouth on this topic. Lieberman is in this camp. You can't disagree with them at all, or even challenge them without being called anti-semitic. My former Republican boyfriend who is as intelligent, rational, thoughtful, open-minded, and sophisticated as they come on every other issue (which is why I liked him, despite some political differences), told me that even if he agreed with Obama on everything, he couldn't vote for him because he's muslim. I tried to reason with him, but was unable to.

What's so disturbing about Lieberman's willingness to slander Obama is that Obama went to Connecticut to campaign for him at Lieberman's request. They were friends. I'm guessing they no longer are. Like I said -- otherwise reasonable Jewish people become unhinged on the topic of Israel.

user-pic

I am starting to become uncomfortable by the number of people who have screwed Obama in the back: Lieberman, Wright, now Jackson. I backed him because he had good judgment. Now he stabs me in the back on FISA. Damn.

However, the FISA bill, I suspect is unconstitutional. Statutes can't trump a constitutional amendment. The only way to undue the 4th Amendment is with another amendment.

Lieberman's career is toast in 194 days.

Maybe only 117.

user-pic

From the end of the linked article

...“I would hope that Joe Lieberman would know better,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said. “I don’t know if this means he is transitioning to become a Republican. Again, I would hope not. I mean, he’s a positive member of this body, and I just hate to see this all happen this way.”

Dianne, Dianne, tell me again how Joe's been a positive member of "this body" since he was elected as an Independent Democrat? Please wake up.

His warmongering has just gotten worse, especially towards Iran, if that is possible and let's not forget is quasi-acceptance to speak at the Republic convention, if McSame asks him.

Since I'm not sure Feinstein is a Democrat any more - she doesn't usually vote like one - I don't she's in a position to complain. Unfortunately, we're stuck with her for four more years. (Unless we can convince her to resign.)

Drown out Feinstein in 2010.

I emailed Feinstein last night and told I would contributing to her opponent next primary for her continued support of anti-democratic party positions and her contributions of suppost of the Bush adminstration. I just can't see how CA democrats have suported her.

user-pic

Elsa's comment is unfortunately all too accurate. With some exceptions, not including Lieberman, Jewish Republicans represent a part of the Jewish community that has abandoned any commitment to Jewish democratic ideals or social justice in favor of ethnic paranoia. There is little to distinguish them from Bosnian Serbs who still support Radovan Karadzic and Radko Mladic.

In fact, during the Bosnian War, I found myself arguing more than once with such people, who insisted that the reports of Serb atrocities had to be Muslim propaganda.

I occasionally meet these primates at weddings, Bar and Bat Mitzvahs or at other Saturday morning services. As the saying goes, they can't change their minds, and won't change the subject.

user-pic

The 2000 election seriously broke both Lieberman and McCain. It damaged them to the core because neither of them were beaten by the merrits of the campaign but by the heinious bullshit that was/is Bush/Rovarian tactics. Their souls were shattered and they both were reduce into the thralls who played kissy lips ans kiss-ass to their abuser.

Think political Stockholm's syndrome.

This why they cling together like those stupid stuffed mobkeys with squares of Velcro on their hands and feet.

user-pic

Feinstein votes like a Democrat more often than Obama does.

Diane votes protectionism like a battered wife shy from the fists of her battering spouse.

Goto to http://www.progressivepunch.org and check out how progress these folk truly are before shooting from the hip without ammo in your guns.

Losermann's antics are one of many reasons why Israel is conflict with entire middle east region.

MEMO TO DEMS: dispose of losermann quickly!

when Lieberman says best for "the country", which counry is he talking about?

Have they figured out a way to surgically detach Lieberman and Lindsey Graham from the hips of McCain?

I emailed Feinstein last night and told I would contributing to her opponent next primary for her continued support of anti-democratic party positions and her contributions of suppost of the Bush adminstration. I just can't see how CA democrats have suported her.

The democratic leadership in the Senate should be horse whipped for the continuation of LIEberman in a leadership position. They are willing to allow him to debase prinicple and intregity for what gains politically. I only hope the message we can send in november to those political whores will serve notice that a new day is at hand and we will not be fooled again! I plan to financially support their opponents in their next primary contest. I think they need to know democrats nationwide will not be blind to their actions!

user-pic

Under normal circumstances I take offense at the charge that somebody-or-other who's Jewish has divided loyalties, isn't really *quite* all-American. It's an old slur, usually used to question the patriotism and loyalty of Jews.

Unfortunately, in Lieberman's case it seems like the slur is right on target. The SOB thinks he's in the Knesset, not the Senate -- and in the farther reaches of the Likud Party to boot.

As for the irrationality of many American Jews on the subject of Israel...yeah, it's there. Let me see if I can explain some of it, without seeming like I'm apologizing for it or excusing it.

America lost 2,700 people in terrorist attacks on September 11th, and the country went certifiably nuts. It was a horrible event, a tragedy (2,700 tragedies), and a shock; we reacted with a severe case of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. (It didn't help that the goddamn networks played tape of the plane crashing into Tower #2 every seven minutes, so the image could be drilled in the psyche of everybody watching.) The country has been in the throes of PTSD ever since, and is just beginning to emerge. It'll take a couple of generations for us to get back to something like normal.

That was from losing 2,700 people. Now imagine losing 6 million people...something like 1/3 of all the Jews in the world. Virtually every Jew who survived lost relatives. (I lost all of my family in Europe except two cousins.) They were killed carefully, methodically, by people who wanted to eradicate people like us from the earth.

All this happened while the world watched...and did nothing. The ship "St. Louis", filled with Jewish refugees, sailed across the Atlantic -- and was turned away by every country where it tried to land, including Cuba (then under heavy US control) and the US itself. They had to go back to Germany; most of the Jews died in the gas chambers. The United States knew what was happening in Nazi-occupied Europe; it was reported on CBS Radio by Edward R. Murrow as early as 1943. Administration officials knew even earlier, through intelligence channels, but didn't lift a finger to stop it. It was proposed that the railroad tracks to the camps be bombed, so that the transports couldn't carry more Jews to them. The proposal was rejected. Why? Partly entrenched anti-semitism in the State Department, partly (I suspect) because John Foster Dulles and other former backers and representatives of Germany wanted to keep the railroad system intact for what they saw as the future war with Russia. In any case, the tracks remained intact; the Americans did nothing until the end of the war, when the army liberated the camps. And the Jews kept getting slaughtered while the world watched.

If you think America's PTSD after 9/11 was bad, think of how the Jews of the world reacted to the Nazi genocide and the world's indifference. From this reaction came the final Zionist push to establish the state of Israel, and from this reaction came the almost feral response to any criticism of Israel. It is seen as the one safe haven for Jews in a world that cannot be trusted as far as we are concerned, and any action Israel takes in its own defense -- ANY action -- is therefore justified.

I say all this as explanation, not justification. I am no apologist for the actions of Israel's government, still less for those of the fanatics in the settler movement who have held the levers of power for two decades, and still less the American fanatics who would decree quiescence and blind support among American Jews. I simply wanted to give my colleagues on this forum some inkling of why some of my Jewish cohorts sometimes act like irrational, unthinking fools. They're not fools, but they are the walking wounded.

Peace,
Paul

You make a well-reasoned argument and frame the idea of a national or ethnic PTSD in fair terms.

That said, two wrongs don't make a right. The Palestinians had nothing to do with the Holocaust. The Zionist movement wasn't exactly a peaceful settlement expansion in Palestine. Germany didn't have to carve out a homeland for Jews in Bavaria and you're right, the US behaved terribly throughout all of it. I agree.

But Americans do not have a national debt to pay to the state of Israel and our nation should not blindly support any nation to the detriment of our national interests. AIPAC has a disproportionate amount of power even when compared to other ethnic or national lobbies, e.g. Cuban, Greek, Mexican, Armenian...you name it. Because of our blind support for Israeli policies and actions our own national interests and goals in the region suffer, and many of the region's conflicts cannot be resolved with the US as a biased party. That's just plain bad foreign policy; not anti-semetic or anti-Israel...The US will do more good for everyone with policies that reflect sound reasoning and rational statecraft.

In light of the bellicose rhetoric coming out of the Republicans regarding Iran we should all be concerned about having the next leader continue the current US policy course, particularly when one takes a step back and looks at who wants to have a military confrontation with Iran. It's a colosally bad idea, even worse than the Iraq invasion was, but Dopey-Joe Lieberman, the Republican Jackass crowd, and ISRAEL don't think so. Hmmm.

user-pic

Sometimes it gets wacky. An otherwise liberal friend of mine who converted to Judaism was offended 2 years ago when Patti Smith said at Lollapalooza that Israel should stop bombing Lebanon. As far as he's concerned, if Israel was not allowed to bomb Lebanon, the next thing for all Jews would be boxcars to the gas chambers.

user-pic

Joe LieberSchmuck (I-Likud) says:

... if I've concluded, as I have, that John McCain is best for our country, then why wouldn't I [create the impression that Obama would not be a friend to Israel] ?

Uh, because it's a lie, and you know it?

That is *NOT* what he said, though I am sure he would appreciate your inventing ideas for him.

The bloggers' post on this is correct: What he says is (1) that he likes McCain better. For that single reason, (2) it is natural that he attack Obama's commitment to Israel of all places. It is simple, logical non-sequitur on the one hand, and an open admission of venality on the other. Full stop.

In terms of what he is "getting at", the above is where he got to.

user-pic

Has a person on the Republican side who has shifted into being an independent but retained a Republican chairmanship, ever behaved in this way....actively supporting a Democratic nominee and not been "punished" by his Republican colleagues?

It makes the blue leadership look very weak and smarmy. I know the numbers are close in the Senate but do we have to sell our souls to the devil to keep power? Yuck, yuck!

This is one of the reasons I haven't contributed to the Democratic party for four years. We need leadership on the hill with cahones and ovaries!!!
Could we start knocking some heads around, PLEASE...... Every time I see that sh** eating grin on Joe I want to throw up.

I think Lieberman was so emotionally scarred by losing in Connecticut's Democratic primary that it is all he can do to get up in the morning. He strikes me as a classic depressive with agitation symptoms. This whole McCain thing and, now, his unprincipled attacks on Obama, are a way of lashing out against his demons. With McCain making jokes about bombing Iran and killing them with cigarettes, these two make quite a pair of psychotics. It has become reasonable to fear.

Interesting analysis of why Lieberman might be reacting the way he is.

My question is Why does Lieberman prefer McCain? Could it be generational? Or perhaps, Lieberman has so much of his personal identity wrapped up in "Being a Senator" (his desperation to keep the job in his recent reelection suggests that to be the case) and that McCain has paid his dues (longevity) in the Senate while Obama has not?

It does seem to me that for many Senators, retaining membership in the exclusive "Club of 100" matters at least as much if not more than party loyalty. The Senate was designed by the Constitution to protect the national elites from democracy, and when you watch the way wealth gets you there and keeps you there, it is clearly working. Joe belongs to that group primarily because he is an incumbent from a small state, but he clearly does belong by the rules the Senate sets for itself.

He may also see himself as Israel's most powerful and reliable protector in the U.S. government, so that he has to stay as long as he can by any means, fair or foul.

That would mean that he prefers McCain because 1) McCain has paid his Senate dues and Obama has not, and 2) McCain clearly has campaigned as being more compliant to extreme right-wing Israeli positions, which as pstamler pointed out above, have a powerful hold on many current Jews in large part because of recent history (I'd add the Arab attacks on Israel in 1948, '67 and '73 to the history of the Holocaust.)

Just wondering.

user-pic

I'm convinced that Intrade is a near-perfect lagging indicator, therefore McCain-Liebermann were toast 3 weeks ago.

Good to see Lieberman finally admit that Israel is his country. Let's hope he goes home real soon.

It is really interesting to have this "friend or foe" of Israel debate out of the closet. I loathe Lieberman but thank him for shedding light on our poor foreign policy positions, e.g. blindly supporting Israel. Until now the political suicide pact of not being a "friend of Israel" has been made behind closed Capitol Hill doors. Now the entire American public can read between the very big, 2.5 line spacing; our politicians are all beholden to AIPAC and are afraid to utter a word against their agenda (never mind vote agains settlement loans, supporting Palestinian right to a separate state, or heaven forbid an invasion of a neighboring country...)

I hope Lieberman keeps gassing on about Obama's lack of support for Israel in his grating, weak voice until November. Eventually Americans are going to realize that Israel is by a long measure the strongest nation (militarily) in the Middle East, is an undeclared nuclear power and receives a disproportionate amount of US taxpayer money to be a bully to her neighbors. Obama wants a rational policy in the region and one that supports our interests, not one regional partner's interests. The current policy of support Israel blindly is no where near rational or in our nation's interests.

user-pic

When Joe Lieberman says that "John McCain is best for our country" he's referring to Israel not the U.S. His statement then makes perfect grammatical sense.

user-pic

Exactly Mr. Franklin,

Lieberman's allegiance is to Israel not US!

Lieberman and McCain want to bomb, bomb, bomb iran. Obama wants to avoid war with Iran. Obama wants to avoid a Middle East calamity.

Lieberman endorses Israel's building settlements on occupied land which is contrary to international law.

user-pic

Lieberman didn't work half this hard for his own ticket in 2000 as he is for McCain.

user-pic

Shorter Lieberman: Why wouldn't I lie to help my guy? He's gonna put me in his cabinet.

user-pic

That's it in a nutshell. Lieberman's going down and knows only McCain is likely to throws him a lifeline.

Not a democrat. An "Independant".

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

he truly sucks.

God, I hope Republicans are right and this Mr. Nice Guy is just a routine from Obama to win the election. Because after he is elected, I would love to see him bitch slap people like Joe Lieberman and Jesse Jackson, until they cry like little girls!

And why are we surprised at this? They're all politicians -- their main interest is in doing what is best for themselves. The country comes second. Lieberman is rolling the dice here but we saw this coming a long time ago. A this stage of his career, he has nothing to lose. If Obama loses the election, it's no big deal to him. He will have plenty more chances if he wants and he has acquired a lot of clout in the Senate. It's a win-win for everybody.

As a Muslim, VERY FEW things offend me as much as when people automatically assume that I have an innate dislike for Jews; but on the contrary, this cannot be any further from the truth. There are crazies in EVERY walk of life (race / religion / nationality / etc.) who are loud enough to give off the impression that their sentiments are shared by the entire group they are affiliated with.

That being said, now, if I (or any other Muslim) speak of this statement for what it is - inane, unpatriotic and dare I say treasonous, I am at best brushed off as having an ulterior motive for being offended or at worst condemned for being blatantly anti-Semetic.

By the way, here is something that gonna make you go hmmm... for me or any other Muslim to be an anti-Semite it would mean that I'm Anti-ME - how could THAT be possible. For one thing, I know I think I'm an ok guy and my people? My people (for the most part) are just as ok. Go figure...

are you all questioning joe's
INTEGRITY!?!?!

As an American Jew...or at least an American who really dug the Old Testament in Sunday School...I think I would be remiss if I said that most Old Testament scholars would argue that Lieberman is sort of a doofus...

Joe Lieberman is Eeyore. Give him a break; the guy's just pissed about having lost his tail.

don't look at Joe Lieberman as a democratic or independent politician,look at him as a lobbyist for Israel's interests and not America's interests. Then you see and understand why he says and acts like he does.

user-pic

It's so funny to read comments here. Here are people who are against American support of Israel, who voted against Clinton because they didn't like her support of Israel, who voted for Obama because they thought that he would be more critical of Israel and put pressure on Israel. Guess what, Joe Lieberman agree with you and he repeat what you have been saying. So, what's your problem?

user-pic

Just for the record, Abroadabroad, I agree with you. But a lot of American Jews don't, and I was trying to explain why they get so emotional about it.

And just to nitpick...not all Muslims are Semites. Think of the millions of Muslins in Indonesia, for example. Okay, I'm being pedantic.

Peace,
Paul

Lieberman is an Israel firster and scumbag of the first order.

The Iran issue is 100% Israeli, Iran is,in fact, no danger to the US. Make Israel adhere to the standards that it and the US want to impose on Iran. If Israel and the US want Iranian nuclear transparency, then Israel better be just as transparent.Israel refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty ,which Iran has done. Israel refuses to allow IAEA inspections of their nuke facilities, which Iran has done. Israel refuses to comply with any UN resolutions, which the US protects it from. All these issues should be brought up everytime the word Iran is spoken.

Lieberman recently said the following:

"If Israel is in danger today it is not because of us foreign policy, which has been strongly supportive of Israel in every way," he said. "It is not because of what we have done in Iraq. It is because Iran is a fanatical, terrorist, expansionist state and has a leader and a leadership that constantly threatens to extinguish the state of Israel."

It should have read like this:

"If Israel is in danger today it is because of US foreign policy, which has been strongly supportive of Israel in every way," he said. "It is because of what we have done in Iraq. It is because Israel is a fanatical, terrorist, expansionist state and has a leader and a leadership that constantly threatens to extinguish the state of Palestine."

Lieberman was part of the conspiracy to go to war with Iraq. Phillip Zelikow, Bush adviser and member of the 9/11 commission said " Iraq war was launched to protect Israel." The war was not about WMDs, advancing democracy, or oil...it was all about Israel. Lieberman is the major Zionist politician on the Hill. We have lost 4000 men and women for the sake of Israel.

I will be proud of the day when Obama,not McShame, will put the interest of America before the interest of Israel and not be crucified for it. It's a shame that American politicians are selected, not on their commitment to the best interests of America, but by vowing to put the interests of a foreign nation, Israel, first. The oath of allegiance that I said everyday in school was not to Israel, or any country but America.

I don't think we even have discuss the ethnic side of Joe Lieberman. He's not a scumbag, because he is a Jew, or because he is a staunch supporter of Israel (which I would question). Joe Lieberman is a self-absorbed scum-bag, because he is a self-absorbed scum-bag! Period-Stop!

Actually, Lieberman has jumped parties. Who cares what he thinks. For sure not the elderly little Jewish grandmother who talks of the "old days" In Israel. I knew her before I moved to Arizona from Oregon. I miss her terribly but I got a surprise call from her in May urging me to NOT vote for McCain like I did by write-in the last two elections. I talked to her to see just why she advised me not tovote for McCain and she quickly said, "Lieberman has been a disgrace for Jews and he has been ruined by his association with McCain." She died last month but I shall remember what she told me. She felt McCain was a phony Israel supporter and that Obama as a Christian would do far more for them than McCain ever would. I wish she could have lived to see how well Obama is doing. She got very prophetic and said she thought that Blacks and Jews would get together under the Obam leadership.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address