« Elizabeth Edwards To Promote Health Care Group | Home | RNC Gearing Up For Swing-State Ad Campaign Against Obama »

Well Known Liberal Blogger Shot In Washington, D.C.

Brian Beutler, a well-known progressive blogger, was shot and seriously injured during a mugging last night in Washington, D.C.

One bullet damaged Beutler's spleen, and he had it removed during surgery this morning at the Washington Hospital Center. He's expected to make a "pre-trauma" recovery, which is to say, a completely full recovery.

The shooting was confirmed to us by Tracy Van Slyke, the project director of the Media Consortium, a network of leading progressive news organizations (TPM is a member) for which Beutler is the Washington correspondent.

Some of the details of the incident are still sketchy. According to Van Slyke, Beutler was walking with a friend after leaving a bar in Washington's Adams Morgan section when the two were confronted by a man demanding their cell phones near 17th Street and Euclid Street.

It's unclear as yet what happened, but the man fired several shots at Beutler. One bullet hit him in the spleen and he was hit twice in the shoulder. A D.C. police official said he wasn't aware of any arrests made in connection with the shooting.

Beutler's companion called 9-11. After getting rushed to the hospital by ambulance, Beutler underwent surgery.

Beutler's family is with him now at the hospital, and his friends are anxiously keeping track of his recovery.

"He is currently in stable condition, awake and in pain," Van Slyke wrote in an email to colleagues. "But, true to form, he is already cracking jokes."

According to Van Slyke, Beutler was supposed to file a piece with the Consortium today. In his first words today to his editor, Adele Stan, he said dryly: "Sorry. I left you high and dry."

Late Update: As you may have seen down in the comments, Beutler friend and former TPMmuckraker Spencer Ackerman checks in after visiting the hospital:

Hi guys,

I've just come back from the hospital, where I got to see Brian. He's going to be OK. Sure enough, he's in stunningly good spirits -- way way better than I would be if the situation was reversed. Strong like bull, that dude. He thanks everyone for their good wishes.

But please, this is a sensitive time for Brian and his family and friends, and our primary concern is his convalescence. Please respect this. Consider how you would feel if you were in his shoes.

Thanks,
Spencer


124 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

O Jeez, this is awful. I hate this. I'm glad he's going to be alright.

user-pic

absolutely horrible. thank god it will be okay.

That's really close to where I live :-(

I really hate D.C. sometimes.

No, not ok. A spleen loss will affect his immune system for the rest of his life.

the lesson being, of course, that we need to relax D.C. handgun restrictions!

right, Rush? Scalia? Deadeye Dick?

user-pic

Right, cuz a guy who'll shoot you for your cell phone would soooo follow those restrictions...way to use one of your bud's tragedy to try to score cheap political points!

user-pic
way to use one of your bud's tragedy to try to score cheap political points!

Hope you were as hard on Bush and Cheney for twisting the tragedy of 3000 lost on 9/11 to march us into Iraq, as you're being to blackstar here. Do you even read what you post before you post it? Or does this fall under the "Are you so cynical that you can't recognize comedy when you see it?" defense...

user-pic

Nope...no comedy in the post above...pure disdain.

and rightly so.

user-pic

No, we should make it easier for more assholes to get even more guns. Fuck your NRA.

user-pic

Ahh yes, the old Reagan "if guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns" argument. Kind of a mini-arms race scenario, if you will. I'm sure that SFCWallace here would argue that if only Mr. Beutler had had a handgun on him that they could've had an old-fashioned "shoot out" a la Jesse James and Mr. Beutler could have gunned-down his assailant. Yessireebob, there's your answer to all that pesky handgun violence -- public shoot-outs.

user-pic

If the GOP didn't come around on common sense gun control after Reagan, the object of all their man-crushes, was shot, you know they *never* will...

user-pic

Well since the type of ammo used by Hinkley was already "banned" in the US at the time of the shooting I'm not sure how more banning would've prevented it. Banning something doesn't make it disappear, it only makes law abiding people get rid of it.

user-pic

Nope, just pointing out that banning guns won't stop a someone inclined to shoot you for your cell phone from using one. I'm noot sure but chances are he didn't run down to Wal-mart and pick up the gun he used right after the ban was lifted.

user-pic

Sorry, but this is exactly the kind of scenarion that you seem to be advocating. You even state further down-thread: "At least give the good guys a fair chance..." If you're not advocating a "shoot out" scenario, then what exactly is it that you are advocating by giving Mr. Beutler a "fair chance"?

user-pic

There's an excellent op-ed in the NY Times about the law of self-defense -- and the non-lethal alternatives to guns. Idjits who jabber about a "right of self-defense" as rationalization for the bogus "absolute right" to own guns -- er, I mean, of "self-defense" -- can either, finally, get an education in the fact that the "right" of "self-defense" has ALWAYS BEEN, and SHALL ALWAYS BE, REGULATED -- i.e., LIMITED -- or they'll put their own asses in jail.

Now that there are non-lethal alternatives to guns, one will no longer have a legitimate claim of "I had to kill him, because he pointed a pencil at me, and I hadn't any alternative."

Will have to learn, that is, that not only self-described "responsible gun owner" gun-nuts have rights, based upon bogus "arguments" about "patriotism" and "Founders/Framers," and false Jeffersonism, and the "Declaration of Independence," and the Constitution:

Those they would purportedly "defend against" -- 99 per cent of which are paranoid fantasies about the non-existent -- ALSO have rights.

One of those rights is to not be shot/killed by some self-righteous hothead who hasn't the first clue to logic, and logical "argument" -- merely claiming to be "responsibile" does not make it so -- let alone the actual history and legal history and law applying to these issues. As "ignorance of the law is no excuse," the TRULY responsible don't jabber anti-Constitution NRA irrationaliaties; instead, they ACTUALLY know the ACTUAL law, as it is their RESPONSIBILITY to know it.

Still, we have yet to hear/see ANY of these self-defined "responsible gun owners" EVER speak of "rights" OTHER THAN THEIR "RIGHT" to kill others based upon BS. Claiming to be "responsible" is not sufficient in itself in the face of centuries of law which is far more refined than is irrationally self-righteous knuckle-dragging.

Just like your buddies did after the VA Tech shootings, hypocrite.

I'd like some clarification of your vitriol.

1) whose buddies?
2) which ones?
3) did what, exactly?
4) citations please?

your right. a prolific liberal blogger would never want his own misfortune to be used to help emphasize a political point he espouses. your faux outrage would amuse him more, i think.

Yep -- after all "the right of the people" obviously means that every individual can have as many guns, rifles, assault weapons, or even WMDs as they'd like. I can't find anywhere in the Constitution where it distinguishes between handguns and nuclear warheads.

user-pic

17th and euclid is dangerous as shit. And they also have one of the Metro police cams there too. a friend of mine was mugged there a couple months ago and he got beat up and had to get metal plates inserted into his face.

That's why I don't like to go into Columbia Heights.

Euclid and 17 is not Columbia Heights.

user-pic

Good to know for when I visit DC - thanks...

Here's to a complete recovery for Brian.

DC has now welcomed him as a true Washingtonian, because the locals all know that this title is only achieved after one has been mugged here.

I think Brian might get a special status though for taking 3 bullets...

Wow. Kudos to Mr. Beutler for recovering so well. You are in my thoughts. I am so happy to hear that you are alright.

I live around the corner from where this occurred. The spot -- immediately to the east of a popular nightlife district -- is a shockingly dangerous island in a neighborhood that is otherwise gentrified. DC can often be an unstable place, and places that seem safe can very quickly and unpredictably prove not to be. A friend of a friend had his jaw broken in the same area a few months ago; the assailant did not so much as utter a word before hitting him. Violence is much, much more prevalent than in NYC, where I lived for a long time.

Yeah, which is why I want to move to Texas this summer.

I think there are some guns there too . . .

The best part is that you can carry them around as concealed weapons. I can't wait to get a nice gun :-)

user-pic

Yeah, the feel-good part is when you enter a restaurant and there's a sign on the door, "Concealed weapons are not allowed on these premises." And then, you think about all the restaurants you've been in, that did not have that sign. And think twice about going into one of them again. It's creepy to think about that guy at the bar sucking down a beer and laughing too loud has gun under his coat.

The violent crime rate in Texas is not lower than elsewhere. There are just more people with guns hidden on their persons.

Thanks.

mp


user-pic

My favorite is the sign at the Virgina state archives in Richmond that says that for the safety of their patrons, no illegal guns are allowed on the premises. Legal ones, apparently, are perfectly OK.

user-pic

And obviously, the people carrying illegal guns would either go down the street to get them registered before entering, or hand them to the clerk at the front desk for the duration of their visit.

Hopefully, he'll fully recover. Thankfully, he wasn't killed outright, and had friend to call 911 for him.

Separately, this helps to point out the lack of results that bans on handguns bring. Criminals need not follow the law, by definition. Only honest citizens.

The lesson being, of course, that citizens might need to protect themselves. Legally. With the same amount of force as their assailant.

“If a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged, a liberal is a conservative who's been arrested” - Thomas Wolfe.

user-pic

So your argument is that Beutler should have whipped out his Colt and started banging away? Yeah, let's all be violent and indifferent to the taking of human life ... just like the criminals.

Good idea!

"We have met the enemy, and he is us." -- Pogo

"Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars... Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." -- ML King

Yeah, much easier to simply kill people, maybe nail an innocent bystander or two, than to actually solve the problems that lead to the violence.

Beutler has my sympathy. I know firsthand how scary it is to be confronted by naked violence (though I've never been shot). And I'm glad he wasn't as murderous as his assailant. He has something to live for; his assailant is dead to the world.

Thanks.

mp

So your argument is that Beutler should have whipped out his Colt and started banging away?

Um, no. I think the point of this line of argument is that the mugger dared to attack as he did because he felt confident it would be safe. He saw a law-abiding citizen who could not pull out his own gun and shoot back because he could not own or carry one under the law.

You may not agree with this line of argument, but we should all try to understand and honestly represent opposing views, even as we prove them wrong. It's important.

Michael: Nice straw-man argument. Not what I said, not what I intended, but it's emotional, and full of righteous fury. Why are the options presented by anti-gun folks always so black and white? It's like listening to the conservatives rant about how our only choices in Iraq are "Stay the course" or "Cut and Run". Gets really annoying after a while.

A more reasonable option for the rational person is to carry a handgun and simply let the mugger know that you have one. That way I don't have "murderous intent", only a simple determination to protect myself. Deterrence is only an option when the other party respects your ability to cause them harm.

When somebody invents a personal force-field or some other perfect method to ignore bullets, well, that would be the best option to choose for personal defense. Right now, deterrence is the only option we have, other than submitting to the good will of some criminal.

You sir, are free to act as Ghandi would have, to give up your possessions and possibly life at the whim of some other person. I choose to utilize the rights I have under the Constitution to protect myself in the manner appropriate to the situation.

I wasn't quoting Mr. Wolfe to provide a moral defense for my statements, I was simply noting the irony in the situation. Our unfortunate friend will soon be able to give lie to that quote, should he choose to do so.

Bar: Hard to be a "gun nut" if I don't even own one at the present time. I vote Democratic, my political leanings are libertarian, and I hate people who trash the Constitution. I put 12 years in the military, and yes, I have a clue.

Sorry for the intrusion. Again, I sincerely hope that Brian recovers as much as possible.

user-pic

Fucking gun nuts need to get real and understand that life is not a Chuck Norris movie.

user-pic

We realize that...Chuck Norris doesn't need a gun to protect himself...Chuck Norris IS deadly force...

user-pic

"Why are the options presented by anti-gun folks always so black and white?"

Why are gun-nuts incapaable of thinking in terms not only of grey, but also in terms of actual reality?

While they claim to be "responsible"?

There are at minimum three -- not two -- positions on the issue.

1. Gun-nut -- gun control is unconstitutional and the same as gun banning/confiscation.

2. Hand guns should be banned.

3. Gun control has existed, in every society, since the advent of guns. It is a matter, for one, of public safety. A society's regulation of dangerous substances and objects is both sane AND RESPONSIBLE.

Such regulation is RESPONSIBLE.

Put simply, irresponsible simpleton: regulation of gun ownership is not ipso facto "anti-gun". It IS pro-public safety.

user-pic

I don't know Mr. Beutler's work, so I clicked on the link that was provided.

Was that just a random connection, Greg?

If not, it seems unreasonably tacky on your part to include a link to an issue you have been pushing for over a week now. If this appears harsh, sorry.

user-pic

come on CT. that's a link to all his posts

user-pic

And please accept my apologies for what clearly was a tactless and classless remark on my part.

user-pic

That's an archive of all his writing. Maybe you should read more carefully before saying things quite so disgusting.

user-pic

The first page is a column on FISA. Forgive me for not realizing that that was an entire archive of writings. I was expecting biographical information.

Wow. Tacky, CT.

user-pic

more than harsh. that's complete nonsense. he linked to a page that has all brian's stuff. you think we're using this as an opportunity to push the FISA story?

user-pic

It was tacky and mean spirited, and I apologized. When I clicked on the link, all I saw was the FISA story, and my first reaction was "Can't they just give this a rest every once in awhile?"

Obviously I was quite mistaken, and shouldn't have wrote what I wrote.

user-pic

You're forgiven...by me anyway...

Get well soon Brian!

Why are handguns even allowed at all? It's not as if people need them for hunting.
Never mind . . .

user-pic

Repeat of what I said to Blackstar above...you guys amaze me sometimes.

FYI: 17th and Euclid is Adams Morgan, not Columbia Heights. CH has enough of its own crime problems without having to take responsibility for things that happen in other 'hoods.

Speedy recovery for Mr. Beutler!

This was supposed to be in reply to Flufferwink above, but I am incapable of checking boxes.

Sorry but 17th and Euclid is NOT Columbia Heights. It's Adams Morgan.

My best wishes to the gentleman. However, we shouldn't immediately start up the sacramental sniping about guns. Neither guns for everybody or guns for no one work. Where do they actually have lower levels of civic violence? Don't look at gun ownership. It doesn't mean much. Look at the level of medical services available. Look at equity in pay, look at a history racism, suburban flight -- multi-factorial causes that really don't have much to do with guns, though the sacramental nature that they have for the right and the left is a huge distraction. I don't see the situation changing if the Brians of the world were packing and started blasting at every opportunity. You end up with Deadwood that way.

I'll drink to his speedy recovery.

FYI, live 1 block from there and there is a police crime camera at the corner of 17th and Euclid. The intersection has been notorious for crime (drugs, muggings, etc) for quite some time. Hopefully they can use it.

Have you considered getting a handgun?

user-pic

Have you considered getting a set of one-piece pajamas with built-in kitten slippers?

Good luck to him.

user-pic

God bless, Brian - get well soon!

And Swift63 - put a sock in it for now, will ya?

Sfc Wallace is right! Let's get everyone a gun and all the shootings and other gun crimes will magically stop!

What would we do without conservatives???

user-pic

At least give the good guys a fair chance...

yup, and the off chance that mugger guns him down, instead of taking his celphone, he takes his gun...then what?

A fair chance at murdering someone?

So Scalia was right after all. Dumbass Supreme Court decisions can possibly cost American lives. Too bad he isn't intelligent enough to figure out which ones will.

user-pic

I think it's a distinct possibility that the handgun in question was not legal for the mugger to possess.

I think it's a distinct possibility that because of the Supreme Court's ruling, more muggers (who moonlight as honest citizens) will have greater availability to handguns, which are always illegal during the commission of a crime.

user-pic

Maybe if it took more than an hour to walk from anywhere in D.C. to Virginia, this would be true. As it is, the additional hurdle provided by the unavailability of handguns in the District was nothing compared to the hassle of illegally obtaining a gun. The 5th segment of this This American Life episode is a window into the world of how petty thieves get guns.

As anyone who has been assaulted, or burgled, etc. knows, the wounds can be more than physical. Best wishes to Brian for a full and speedy recovery on all counts.

Have you ever wondered why the U.S. is number one in gun violence, in the world? I mean seriously, what the fuck?

I don't want to use the Beutler tragedy to stand on a soap box, because, to be honest, I don't think arming everyone is the answer either. We just have a society where people couldn't give a rats ass for their fellow man.

This was brought home to me last night when I watched this absolutely horrifying clip of a woman collapsing in an ER, and the security guards--not once, but twice--noticed her in an incapacitated state and didn't do a fucking thing! I almost threw my shoe at the T.V.! Those assholes need to be prosecuted for manslaughter. Oh yeah, in case you didn't know, she DIED!

Anyway, we are living in a society that looks at people as consumers rather than human beings, and we are reaping the rewards in spiraling violence and a simple lack of human compassion. It's absolutely frightening.

user-pic

Can we wait 24 f*ing hours before turning this into a public policy debate? Please?

To be fair, that's what all the comment threads are about - debating politics. I doubt it was the intention of Greg to open this subject up for some sort of debate but people do as they're accustomed to do.

So at around 4pm tomorrow it will be fair game. Gotcha.

If someone else gets shot tomorrow, will we have to wait another 24 hours?

Damn that is crazy. I used to live right on that corner 17th and Euclid, great area back in early 90s. I must say I got mugged right on my doorstep circa 1993 and I'm 6'4" football guy, 2 guys and a knife at your throat will make anybody give up their wallet. I hope he gets well.

...and if he had been mugged by a man with a knife, it surely wouldve been the fault of the knife. brilliant. one must be rather foolish to believe that only conservatives believe in the right of gun ownership. that's just another self-satisfying delusion that passes as reality for the benighted, and keeps you out of step with the majority (yes we're still a democracy so that's relevant) view. i've never voted repuglican my entire life, and i just knew my "liberal" friends were gonna try to spin this toward their desire to empower the state to disarm its own citizens. also brilliant, and not very "liberal" at all. nice try pollyannas, but the article is another example of why we keep 'em and why we won't be givin 'em up. you can cry yourself to sleep about that if you wish, but guns are a fact of life here on earth and they wont be goin away any time soon. especially not mine! cheers!

user-pic

And we thank you very much for your "concern".

Why are you doing this? Is this the right framework to be doing this?

the article is another example of why we keep 'em and why we won't be givin 'em up

Uh, is it?

uh, I hate this. I'm so glad he's going to be ok. Adams Morgan is such a strange mix of gentrification and apathy and anger. I've encountered both there. Again, I'm so glad he's going to be ok.

I live at 17th and Euclid. The 1-7 Gang that got taken out by the police a few weeks ago is back in operation. There is a police camera at that intersection, but it doesn't help. Muggings on that stretch of Euclid St are almost a nightly occurrence. I hope he's ok.

I had a splenectomy in 1988 and I rarely get sick. We're all different and who knows how I adjusted but if you have to lose an organ, make it the colon, spleen, or gall bladder. A completely normal life can follow, that is, if you consider eating healthy and using complementary medicine normal.
D.C. is a terrible city and it has everything to do with being the seat of the federal government. Best!

First of all, best wishes and hopes for a speedy recovery to Mr. Beutler.

A distant second to sleepytowne -- Thanks for your evaluation of my city.

Every city, town, province, and farm has its problems. DC still grapples with hot spots of violence and an on rush of gentrification, much like Philly and Chicago. Solely blaming the federal government for DC's woes is stupid, just like writing off DC as a city because it is the seat of the federal government.

Too many people do not realize that this city is a vibrant town with a unique culture and mix people -- including all the pitfalls -- and simply disregard it because the Federal Government calls it home. Roughly 600,000 people live in DC. Our lives are not all dominated by the functioning of the Feds, so please do not slap labels on my city with such an ill informed point of view.

Sorry for being a cad. Almost every city is a great city at its best. I only meant to decry something that eats away at this truth, and it is not as simple as some simple theory of architecture or social structure or seat of the feds whatever.
D.C. was an important city for me but come on, there's something wrong with it. I respect the vibrant life that you live there. I live in another city that I love that also has its issues, but love is blind, I can barely see them, but I am familiar with them.
Take care, peace, I just want to give a salute to health...

user-pic

17th & Euclid is an area that still has problems, despite being near some of the most expensive parts of Adams-Morgan. Andrew Sullivan lives near by, btw. I used to live a few blocks away, myself and despite the rep, I've taken walks thru there in the evening myself.

Even someone with combat training would have difficulty using a gun properly under the conditions of a mugging. The active fantasy life of a gun nut is no substitute for real world experience.

Hope Buetler is doing okay.

Wish I'd known that when we moved in. But you're absolutely right, 17th & Euclid is notorious, and despite recent gentrification it still has a ton of violent crime.

A bunch of bloggers live in AM (Aravosis, Stoller), but most folks live on the Kalorama Triangle side of things. That is, to the West of 18th St. (the commercial strip - lots of bars) things are quite a bit nicer, to the East (where Euclid runs towards 16th St.), things are a bit sketchier.

Hi guys,

I've just come back from the hospital, where I got to see Brian. He's going to be OK. Sure enough, he's in stunningly good spirits -- way way better than I would be if the situation was reversed. Strong like bull, that dude. He thanks everyone for their good wishes.

But please, this is a sensitive time for Brian and his family and friends, and our primary concern is his convalescence. Please respect this. Consider how you would feel if you were in his shoes.

Thanks,
Spencer

user-pic

Exactly, even gunslingers end up being on the bad end of the drop.

I'm sure the trolls imagine themselves whipping out a gun (while strolling arm and arm with a significant other) and blasting dude away - even though dude has the drop on them.

I am all for guns. Mostly hunting. But if the last 30-40 years have proven anything, RIghtWingers do one HELL OF A JOB mindlessly arguing things they are wrong about. They successfully have suspended debate, or railroaded debate with their fantasyland ideas. That they are total whackjobs, and their ideas worth nothing....has not stopped them from being successful at denying global warming and basic human rights, believing in god and abstinence, etc


amazing projections on fantasy - and so smugly stated with no info behind it. interesting. ive received law enforcement and military combat training, grew up in detroit, and had "real world experience."
so... i guess it's back to the "active fantasy life of an (anti-)gun nut."
the glaring contradiction in the extra-constitutional position that seeks to ban civilian ownership is that when the bad guy with the gun comes, they still wanna call the good guy with the gun, ie the police. seems to be some sort of denial deal. even if they get their way, theyre not eliminating guns, or decreasing the amount of criminals with them -- just preventing people that can legally own them from protecting themselves from tyrants, large or small.
as regards the small tyrant in the above article, i certainly hope the police (that have guns) catch him before he can harm himself or anyone else further. i wish brian a fast and full recovery, and apologize that this issue had to be voiced here. unfortunately someone near the top wasted no time in attempting to spin this in favor of their own agenda which runs counter to our constitution (kinda like Bush, et al) and that quite honestly requires a response in any situation. best wishes to all.

dude~ by a factor of like 10 to 1 a gun in the home is more likely to be used in a crime of passion or rage, or accidentally used to injure or kill a member of the household before it will ever be used to defend the household against some intruder. So do the math ..... if everyone had loaded guns in the house like the old fat nazi Scalia imagines ..... we would have deaths and injury by the truckload and very fucking few John Wayne shootout victories. Good luck with that bullshit. Neocons are fascist wetdreamers. They do not care who or how many die in their macho fantasy world or the real world. Think Iraq.

user-pic

"Good luck with that bullshit. Neocons are fascist wetdreamers. They do not care who or how many die in their macho fantasy world or the real world. Think Iraq."
A well reasond and properly cited argument, backed by well documented sources. Thanks again.

I am not anti-gun at all, but this idea of 'let's give the good guy a chance' argument is weak. What kept the victim from not carrying a gun? Nothing. If he really wanted to have one, he would have. Just drive down into VA for a day on Route 1.

Just because you might be carrying your own weapon does not mean you are going to successfully defend or deter any sort of robbery attempt if the crook gets the element of surprise. If someone brandishes a gun and says gimme that phone, are you really going to pull out your own gun and shoot him? Or are you going to just give it up?

Even military and police with hours and hours of hands on training will attest that situations involving guns and shootings never go like you think they will.

If every citizen was armed, I fear the amateur who has seen too many movies who will pull his gun in a situation and wind up killing innocent bystanders or getting killed himself. It requires very little training to have a concealed permit in most states.


user-pic

"What kept the victim from not carrying a gun? " Uh...they were illegal...banned...remember?

Greg: tell Brian we're all rooting for him out here in the blogosphere. He has to recover not only from the physical injuries but also the emotional trauma and I hope he takes it easy on himself.

As for the comment on D.C., usually Adams-Morgan is a pretty safe place -- it's a very lively neighborhood with an ethnically diverse population. People love living there or going to the numerous ethnic restaurants and clubs. My guess is that this was a pretty unusual occurrence for the area.

Unfortunately this is not at all unusual. We live on Euclid, five houses down from the corner of 17th. In the year and a half we've been here, this is the fifth shooting on our block (and one stabbing) - that we know of. Not the greatest place to raise our daughters (we're moving).

And muggings are a seemingly endless occurrence (as they are in Dupont and Capitol Hill and elsewhere in DC): http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=35512

So does anyone think he got shot for reporting for TMP?

Dunno. What's TMP?

.22 cal was banned? News to me. You don't work in munitions, do you sarge?

user-pic

"... It was loaded with six "Devastator"-brand .22LR cartridges, which contained small lead azide explosive charges and were not manufactured in the U.S.; any bullet which contained actual explosives would have been classified as an illegal explosive device under U.S. federal law at the time Hinckley purchased them."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_assassination_attempt

Not anymore, but I do know how to read.

It shows how worthless DC's handgun ban was at keeping criminals from getting guns all this time. (It's one of the gun violence capitals of the country.) If only the blogger had been packing heat to defend himself.

Anyways, let's hope he has a speedy recovery.

user-pic

Best wishes and sympathy. What a horrible experience and I hope he recovers fully.

I lived in Adams-Morgan in the 1970s; it was a terrific neighborhood AND you had to watch your step. I got mugged on Capitol Hill in broad daylight and another time at night.

user-pic

I lived one block from there back in the early 90s ... that particular intersection has always been a dangerous spot. Adams-Morgan is a fun place to live, but there are just certain streets you don't want to be on after dark. I'm sure that's true in other cities as well.

And for the record I think it was a terrible decision to lift the ban on handguns. We should be working to get guns off the streets, not put more on.


BAC

I have a question.
If all the "muggers, robbers" knew, or thought, that their potential victims might be armed (and dangerous), would the incidence of muggings and robberies go down?

I'm not saying that if muggers, et al are shot dead on a daily basis by armed citizens; Only "what if the criminals thought their victims 'might be armed'".

I would think muggers, like most people, look for an "easy mark", or the easiest, simplest way to do something (in this case, steal a cell phone). The mugger, having a gun, would think it simple to get the cell phone; But, if he thought that the victim may be armed (and vigilant), would he tend to try to find an "easier target"?

Is the DC crime rate so high because the "wolves" know the "sheep" don't have fangs and the "Guard dogs" are "few and far between"?

Just "wondering out loud".

Obama's pick for VP should be...

find that and much more here:

http://darkcomedyhour.com/dcmacdaddy/

Thanks for posting so much detail, Greg, this is way more than I've found in other places.

As I mentioned above, this is at least the fifth shooting on Euclid near 17th in the last year and half. I say at least because I'm pretty sure there are more I'm unaware of. Hell, this one would have passed me by unknown had I not been coming home at 2:30am.

When I returned the police had both 17th and Euclid blocked off to the North and East, respectively. Though the cop I talked to was unwilling to divulge any information, he did say that the "incident" had started down Euclid, near Mozart St. (in front of a recently vacated subsidized apartment building) and ended up 17th St. about halfway to Columbia Rd.

So this "incident" was clearly aggressive, and all the more depressing for that. Appears that Beutler was chased or ran from where the mugging began. The cops were still out this morning as I walked my daughter down Euclid to the bus.

I hope he makes a speedy and full recovery, and I am truly sorry that this continues to happen in the heart of my city and community.

user-pic

this continues to happen in the heart of my city and community.

As a meta-question, can we imagine a level of public insecurity like this persisting in any great European capital?

How can it be beyond the deep and vasty resources of the Federal Government (for crissakes) to guarantee safe passage on the streets 24/7?

Does this betoken:
a)antipathy towards all things urban unreasonably favored by our senate/electoral college arrangements?

b)antipathy to all things African American as intrinsic to Republican electoral strategy?

c)Both?

(answer, c)

In answer to your question ("can we imagine..."), the short answer is a resounding yes. It's not even imaginative, it's an unfortunate reality. All relatively sufficiently large cities have 'spots' or entire neighborhoods where violence in all forms & shapes is a daily if not hourly occurrence, with the authorities unable to prevent the violence -short lived exceptions excluded. Colbertian fact of life.

Damn. I was just apartment hunting in that neighborhood this past weekend. I had no idea that 17th & Euclid had such a terrible reputation, and was so dangerous at night.

I'm moving to DC from out of state, and was actually just discovered Brian's blog last week and was using it as a resource of sorts for scoping out potential neighborhoods. Hope he has a quick and speedy recovery.

After the UK banned handguns, gun violence went soaring upwards as criminals figured law-abiding citizens were now defenseless. And Great Britain is an island so smuggling guns in is harder than elsewhere.

In Utah, where guns can be carried openly or concealed, the murder rate per capita is extremely low. Same in Vermont. Murder rates are determined by the people who live in a place, not by access to guns.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is blind to the facts and living in denial of relity.

user-pic

Is that a picture of Charleton Heston you're using there Dr. Zaius?


i can offer only anecdotal real-world info on this one, but from my own personal experience. the armed thugs in my neighborhood actively avoid those of us that they know are carrying, and they spread the word as to who they know to be carrying. im not advocating this as a social model by any means, im just saying what worked in my neighborhood when it went through a rather rough period due to aggressive drug dealers and too much gunplay. lots of pop--pop-pop that summer. a number of us that are trained and capable with firearms let it be known that was the case, and all got our carry permits that year. while that may sound like a setup for serious community disaster, in actuality the demonstrated presence of a viable deterrent was all that was really necessary. "no sheep here fellas, and those ones are with us..."
things have since calmed down quite a bit, and i no longer feel the need to carry if im on foot after dark in my own neighborhood. so i dont, and am glad of it. more importantly, neither do any of my friends -- who like many here have no desire to take part in such ugliness. this i respect, and those that were there then certainly dont dis on those of us that were willing to, oddly enough.
similarly, when i was six i got real upset at the neighborhood bully for picking on my little brother. i surprised us both by beating him up, and after that we were better friends and just didnt have a bully that summer. the intimidation spell was broken, and all the little prisoners (most notably the bully) were free to play and have fun.
so ya see, it's all about peace and love ;)

be all that as it may, i would advise most people considering carrying one - NOT to. the responsibility is overwhelming and its not like youre gonna get paid for it. civilians that use them in self defence are routinely pursued more aggressively by prosecutors than violent felons that use them illegally in committing a crime. in michigan if the assailant dies, even if he was armed and pulled first, you have to go to trial for murder and be cleared by jury. even if you are cleared of criminal charges, you may still face civil suits from the assailant's family that can cost you everything. in short, if your neighborhood gets really bad, just move. or maybe make friends with the guys that the thugs know to avoid...

Like needing a license/permit/background check has anything to do with harming another human being in this manner. Same guy would have brained him with tire iron to get what it was he wanted from him if a gun weren't available.

I'm not a gun owner, but I do like the availability should I see a purpose to own one in the future (I happen to live in Alaska and protection against wildlife whilst enjoying the great outdoors is something I think about seriously, ref. grizzly mauling of the girl mountain biking through an urban greenbelt in Anchorage, Alaska this past weekend). I'm not interested in killing a wild animal for sport but given the choice between my kids and the animal... there really isn't a choice.

One need not own a gun to appreciate the right to own one - not unlike thinking abortion IS killing a child, but still feeling just as strongly that it should still remain safe and available to those who feel it is necessary for THEIR pursuit of life, liberty and happiness - I'm not interesting in regulating people's personal lives.

I'll be thinking about this young man and his family - although his injury is serious and the mugging surely terrifying - they must be celebrating his survival, I would be.

Murder rates are determined by the people who live in a place, not by access to guns.

So, according to this logic, outlawing gun ownership will have no effect on murder rates. It will, however, reduce the incidence of accidental shooting deaths, etc.

best wishes to brian and his circle in what must be an incredibly difficult time.

btw, any bets on when this thread will shift to healthcare costs? spleenectomies ain't cheap, nor are bullet wounds. who pays in a case like this?

Will he become a right winger after this?

user-pic

My sympathies to Mr. Beutler and I hope he makes a full recovery.

As someone who lived in Adams-Morgan long before the yuppie hordes took over, I am always amazed at how much has changed over the past few decades. Back when I attended elementary school at the old Morgan Community School (the annex was on Euclid Street),I felt protected by the watchful eyes of the "village". Sure, drugs and crime existed. However, from Columbia Road to U Street, my friends and I knew and WERE KNOWN by the largely working-class or professional families that had lived in the same neighborhood for decades. These families attended the same schools and churches, patronized the same stores and made Adams Morgan a relatively safe place for children.

Several of the police officers, shop owners, teachers and administrators at the former Adams and Morgan Community Schools lived in the neighborhood and their children attended these schools. During the late seventies, entire families were displaced due to gentrification and Adams Morgan became a trendy shell of its former progressive self. Violent muggings (like the one in which Mr. Beutler was assaulted) were once extremely rare but now seem to be the norm.

As Adams Morgan, Columbia Heights, Shaw, and Dupont Circle increasingly become enclaves for the wealthy, crimes of opportunity will continue to increase. What was once a very tightly-knit community is now a fashionable address that is less safe than the so-called grittier neighborhood it replaced. Adams Morgan lost its soul years ago when it became the upscale but relatively transient place that it is now.

I believe the only answer to this age old problem is to waterboard people until they give up their guns.

I hope Brian makes a full recovery. All you liberals protect these thugs to relieve your guilt and look, they hate you too.

Guess it's the gun's fault huh? Those evil guns just go off in the hands of little punks on parole who don't give a damn about any law or any person.

How about those DC gun laws. YAY. Maybe if Brian didn't need a piece of paper from a corrupt and bloated bureaucracy that gave him permission to protect himself (f'king absolutely ridiculous)then he could have been carrying and made the fight fair.

It's the keyboard's fault I used the the F word. Not mine. It's my car's fault that I speed.

Liberal idiots. Get over your arrogant selves and your stupid white guilt and live in the real world.

I'm a Mom who followed a link over here from a conservative blog that respectfully mentioned this incident, wished Brian swift recovery, and noted the blogger's name. My son is also named Bryan, and was also mugged at gunpoint a few months ago walking on the way to college in Houston, but was not physically injured. I was brought to tears when I saw the picture of Brian, and he looks strikingly like "my" Bryan. I certainly want to wish you a speedy and complete recovery, Brian! I think that the thing that I hoped that would not be lost in my own child's situation was his day-to-day unguardedness and unreserved goodwill toward everyone he encounters. Thankfully, he was able and wanted to resume walking back and forth to campus - 20 minutes each way, morning, afternoon or night. It was hard for me knowing he was out there, walking, and that the perpetrator was still out there, somewhere, as well. But, I think it would have been harder to think that he might shut down a part of himself and the way he lives, in response to this. It is easy to be cynical about life and I don't have all the answers, or hardly any of them. But most people really are well-meaning, and pretty amazing and special. My wish for you, besides physical recovery, is to stay open to people. It's worth the risk!

such an important reminder. "thanks mom!"
reminds me of the exhortation of Tara, from the Tibetan Buddhist tradition. sounds flowery, but its actually kinda scary: "Be Fearless, Choose Love."

120 replies so far and no one has mentioned the "B" word.....someday soon brain scans will be able to identify the source of your terror to say the word "black".

The problem is that DC has a ridiculous amount of black people.

Remember the line: Q: What's a conservative? A: A liberal who's been mugged.

Well, my guess is that this kid won't become a conservative. It's much more likely that he'll blame himself for being shot because he is of the "oppressor class." I'm interested in seeing how he reacts.

user-pic

testing

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address