« Poll: Obama Takes Narrow Lead In Florida | Home | New RNC Ad Blasts Obama For Not Funding Troops »

CBS Sidesteps Questions About Editing Of McCain Interview

As you may have heard by now, CBS is under attack today because the network mysteriously edited out of an interview with John McCain a passage where McCain flubbed the timeline of the Anbar Awakening and the surge, a serious foreign policy gaffe at a sensitive moment for the Arizona Senator.

The flubbed-timeline quote never aired. It's only available in a transcript on CBS' Web site.

Here's what a CBS spokesperson is sending reporters who ask for an explanation:

As all news organizations do with extended interviews, last night's Obama and McCain interviews were edited to fit the available time and to give viewers a fair expression of the candidates' major differences. The full transcript and video were and still are available at cbsnews.com.

Quite clearly, this doesn't even begin to address the criticism. It doesn't explain why the portion revealing McCain to have badly botched the surge timeline was edited from the piece -- even though McCain on the surge is basically the cornerstone of his argument that he has better foreign policy judgment and seasoning than Obama does.

We're asking CBS for further explanation. We'll keep you posted.


122 Comments

| Leave a comment

Also ask why they SUBSTITUTED A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ANSWER in place of the original answer to the question.

The answer is simple. They knew you's have to run to the potty during the commerical break so they wanted to sell you the stool softener during the interview instead.

LOL

Everyone should email CBS to complain!!!!

McCain's been planning to e-mail CBS about the coverage too, but he can't find Cindy to log on.

LOL

I'm sure he's confused, not knowing which one of the internets CBS is on. That's understandable.

Bless his f*ckin' heart!

user-pic

e-mail address: evening@cbsnews.com

I already sent them somthing. I recommend that you do.

this situation reminds me of the dustup last year over deborah solomon's "Questions For..." columns in the NY Times Magazine. solomon was accused by Tim Russert among others of altering interviews, including by "[combining] questions and [taking] 'an answer and transpos[ing] it to another question.'

the manipulation caught the attention of the NY Times public editor, who wrote a column about it here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/opinion/14pubed.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

the public editor's take was that the practice violated the Times' standards. not too long after that the magazine added a disclaimer to the columns: "INTERVIEW CONDUCTED, CONDENSED AND EDITED BY DEBORAH SOLOMON".

maybe katie and company need to put a disclaimer on CBS News?

Good to see you're covering this, too (along with Olbermann and HuffPo); the rest of the elite media seems to be trying to bury this story.

And yes, CBS's explanation is woefully inadequate.

I agree and I think the timing of this is just hilarious - at a time when McCain surrogates have been whining about media bias in Obama's favor!

It's one thing to change the time length of an interview. Time constraints on Television are just part of the game. But you (CBS, that is) changed his answer. You interfered with the story. How is that good journalism??

user-pic

It's not, if they wanted to edit for time they should drop both question and answer.

I think Couric just likes to have her face time on tv.

This, in my opinion, is one of the biggest and most important gaffes of the campaign. The Bosnia Sniper thing was big, but it didn't undermine Clinton's qualification to be President. The "Bitter" remarks were big, but they too didn't undermine Obama's qualifications to be President.

McCain, however, is running pretty much solely on his foreign policy experience. This gaffe, and actually it isn't a gaffe, a gaffe is accidently telling the truth, anyway, whatever you want to call it, this DOES undermine McCain's argument for why he should be President.

It also undermines the "the press loves Obama" meme.

user-pic

I second flufferwink's suggestion.

If CBS doesn't admit that this is a real mistake on their part, their credibility is in the toilet.

From now on, whenever viewers watch an "interview" on CBS, they're going to have to wonder if the person being interviewed actually said what they said in response to what was asked.

One would think people like Bob Shieffer would be upset about this, or Lara Logan. I do not consider Couric a journalist, so I don't really care what her response is.

user-pic

Come on...CBS' credibility went down the toilet with Dan Rather's fake AWOL story of GWB...did they get it back since then?

user-pic

Nice try.

user-pic

That's what they told Dan right before they fired him...

user-pic

SFCWallace,


Rather's "story" wasn't a fake, the papers he worked from were. The story they told of Bush was accurate but the papers he referred to were faked copies, not the originals.

I have before me a copy of Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox, the copy is just that, a copy; but either the story the copy relates is true or we're still fighting the Civil War.


user-pic

"Rather's "story" wasn't a fake, the papers he worked from were."...
That was the last war...no reason to refight it, but...
"Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically... That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where, if I knew then what I know now, I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question."
http://www.rathergate.com/index.php?p=143

user-pic

SFCWallace.

I noticed the elide in your post, here's what you left out;

"I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/20/politics/main644546.shtml

No where does Rather dispute the story. Click on any of the Videos on that CBS site and you see the same thing, the origin of the documents was the problem, not what the documents said.

If you're going to use links, try not to use wingnut's web sites.

Katie's response is, "get a life, I'm not here to be professional, I'm here to make the big bucks...........what do YOU make, $30,000/year? Fuck off."

It's true, I heard her.

Hilarious.

user-pic

Not even CLOSE to being good enough. And comparing the millions of viewers who watch CBS Evening News with the transcript and video on their web-site is laughable.

We need to keep the pressure up.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

user-pic

"...the rest of the elite media seems to be trying to bury this story."
No, they're just too busy following the golden boy on his magical mystery tour.

Which is a good thing for the McCain campaign. Otherwise we'd be getting wall to wall coverage of just how bad his campaign is right now. Be careful what you wish for....


Nope, we'd be getting edited CBS versions only with the correct answers this time coming from Joe Lieberman's electronically inserted head. Joe is John's travel buddy in the Middle east. Knows all the Sunni spots along the right borders, and how to keep the Shia from hitting the fan. Czech it out.

Which is a good thing for the McCain campaign. Otherwise we'd be getting wall to wall coverage of just how bad his campaign is right now. Be careful what you wish for....
Even Fox News broke away from Mr. McCain midevent to cover the rescue of a bear cub wounded in a California fire and nicknamed Lil’ Smokey. The New Republic: FOX News thinks rescued bear cub is more newsworthy than McCain

...while the inordinate coverage of Obama hurts McCain in some ways, it also dramatically decreases the costs of his mistakes. What exactly are the stories McCain wishes the press had paid more attention to during the last few weeks? His mathematically irreconcilable economic promises...McCain's suggestion that he somehow knows what Maliki wants better than Maliki does...The string of gaffes in his presumed area of expertise (Sunni vs. Shia, Somalia vs. Sudan, Czechoslovakia, the "Iraq-Pakistan border," etc.)?

...when you're running a campaign as weak as McCain's...in a political environment as hostile to the GOP as this one...the less attention anyone pays to you the better off you probably are.TNR: No New is Good News

Don't you think it was weird how CBS substituted a completely different answer in their broadcast and left out McCain's gaffe?

If this had happened to Obama, I would've been upset. We should expect our media not to edit out actual answers to an interview question and submit a different answer instead.

user-pic

Clever and original.

Idiot.

user-pic

Idiot?...you act like I appointed myself chairman of the senate banking committee or something...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjzb61wfyN0

user-pic

SFCWallace,

I guess this CBS story cancels McCain's whining about the NYT not printing his op-ed.

"Liberal media" my ass.

user-pic

SFCWallace says;


"...the rest of the elite media seems to be trying to bury this story."


No, they're just too busy following the golden boy on his magical mystery tour."

Well, cover Obama, or cover McCain and listen to his incessant babble about Obama and the surge.


user-pic

or his 57 state strategy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrsBKGpwi58
or seeing ghosts.(the fallen heros in the audience).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR8YaR3JEkE
or talks about his Russian Uncle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV1sxq8mqvA
or just today appointing himself chairman of the Senate finance committee.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjzb61wfyN0

Welcome to the GOP Talking Points Memo!

You forgot to add Rev. Wright, and that his middle name is "Hussein."

user-pic

So now showing untouched video clips of your candidate is unfair? How about we just annoint the chosen one now and do away with that whole pesky "voting" thing...if he loses it'll be because it was rigged anyway.

or his 57 state strategy...or seeing ghosts.(the fallen heros in the audience)...or talks about his Russian Uncle...or just today appointing himself chairman of the Senate finance committee

Call me old fashioned, a fuddy-duddy, a tradionalist, or even an advocate of Western imperialist chronogoly, but I'd like a President who makes policy decisions based on the concept of linear time.

user-pic

SFCWallace,

gee, how can you debate someone who offers right wing web sites and YouTube as his references?

user-pic

well when you use fake documents typed up in a leftwing nut jobs basement as the basis for yours you have no room to talk. The youtubes are un touched videos of Obama saying the things Im pointing out. If video evidence isn't as good as fake documents, you are the one with the credibility problem.

Didn't CBS just prove to us just how reliable video "evidence" is?

The likely answer on why it was edited out is that those doing the editing weren't smart enough understand what they had.

user-pic

I wouldn't be surprised by that one iota.

Still, they should NEVER cut and paste answers from an interview.

I'm wondering if they didn't hire an ex Daily Show/Colbert report editor.

user-pic
they should NEVER cut and paste answers from an interview.
Tru Dat!

that's possible, but if that's the case, the allegation moves from a lack of integrity to a lack of competence and understanding of the issues they cover. Either way, it raises doubt about whether they can be counted on, or trusted to report news.

user-pic

also, isn't a bit deceptive to ask a question and then air an answer to a different question as if it were the actual response to the question?

does this kind of editing go on alot?

i don't mind that they edited for content and time, i do mind them editing questions and answers.

it's ok when colbert does it because he's funny. it's not ok when katie couric does it because she's supposed to be a serious news anchor.

isn't a bit deceptive to ask a question and then air an answer to a different question as if it were the actual response to the question?

It is more than a BIT deceptive, it makes it a complete fabrication. They created an exchange that did not actually occur.

I would be willing to bet that this was not an isolated incident.

Like I said before, time for the pitchforks and torches.

Time for us to take back our media!

State controlled media? Nope not in the U.S.A.
Corporate controlled media? Not much better.

State controlled media? Nope not in the U.S.A. Corporate controlled media? Not much better.

There is no difference between the two in a corporate controlled state.

Isn't the bigger question the one McCain needs to answer?

There's a reason why he cancelled his press avail today and it's not because of a scheduling conflict or a desire to mingle with the local press....

Absolutely!

It would be great, though, to have the video to smear him.

Oh, wait!

Looks like there is video:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDIAsS9VXiM&e

Given that McWar's entire attack strategy is based on the surge, no news organization can justify trivializing flaws in this attack.

OT but THAT is one cool photo you've got there.

user-pic

And of course the McCain campaign, who have been whining like a three year old in the candy aisle at the market about how little coverage they are getting, canceled their upcoming press availibility.

That is right, McCain is refusing to talk to the press.

Wether this is in response to McCain's ignorance of Iraq's recent past or because of McCain's disgusting comments of late I couldn't say. But for the media starved McCain campaign to turn down a media opportunity...

McCain needs to listen to his adviser Phil Gramm and quit whinin. The networks covered his trip to the Middle East. Except there, when he gave the wrong answers, they cut and pasted with the right answers from Joe Lieberman.

Breaking: McCain takes credit for the recent drop in the price of oil - even though most analysts agree that it was the opening of diplomatic relations with Iran, not Bush's repeal of the offshore drilling ban, that spurred the price drop.

user-pic

Good lord, McCain is even dumber on the economy than he is on Iraq, I wouldn't have thought it possible.

user-pic

...of course by "most analysts" you mean Lou Dobbs and Keith Olberman...(btw Olberman said that the price of oil dropped because Obama told it to).

Link to this?

Crickets?

What, you think making things up is the same as formulating a coherent argument?

McCain supporter indeed.

user-pic

The Olberman comment was obvious sarcasm...obvious to most I suppose...since he fawns over Obama like he wants to have his love child I threw him in the mix...oh, before you ask for a link Keith Olberman can't really get impregnanted by Obama...that was more sarcasm.

So what you're saying is that you simply made it up? Thanks for telling us, but really, I know you can do better than this. You seem like an intelligent fellow. Why engage is such dishonesty? Why not try and persuade us of your position using logic and facts?

Anything less is disgraceful, and that's why McCain is going to lose. He also resorts to this dishonest tactic.

user-pic

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/profile/MonicaL
I'm sure you got on to MonicaL for lying about Hillary's age...you guys crack me up. I don't think you're trying.

Wait, your excuse is that someone else is worse than you?

How about you try and be better and see how that works out?

user-pic

No my point is that you need to pull the stick out of your butt and lighten up a little...sometimes people use humor and sarcasm in their posts...obviously you don't, or can't recognise it....

Like most rightwingers, SFCWallace can't win an argument in the reality and fact based world so he posts lies, distortions and nonsence. BTW Olberman called out Billo O'Reilly for claiming the Americans used less gas because Billo asked them to. I know its pointless to ask this, but SFCWallace, try to get at least some of your facts straight.

user-pic

All of my facts are correct, I'll try to dumb down the vitriol to avoid confusion in the future.

user-pic

What are you talking about? Your "facts" aren't correct, they aren't even facts. Not unless you define "facts" as being: Something I pulled out of my ass.

Thats OK, I find most of your comments dumb enough.

user-pic

SFCWallace says:

"Al of my facts are correct......."

Ae you a right winger?, you act like one, you can't tell the difference between fact and opinion. All of your offerings are opinion.

Here's a fact: 1 + 1 = 2

Here's an opinion; Bush is stupid.

Good grief, Wallace. You have no clue about the fundamental difference between "fact" and "opinion"! What a typical Repub!

user-pic

Most experts are Dumb Asses then. The reduction in margin has more to do with it than world events. If they made it illegal to buy oil futures on credit all together we would find out what the stuff is realy worth.

The answer is simple. They knew you's have to run to the potty during the commerical break so they wanted to sell you the stool softener during the interview instead.

CBS, shame on you.

If Edward Murrow was alive...

Who would have thought of that? Another strike for the MSM.

Now juxtapose CBS' treatment of McCain with Couric's aggressive and myopic questioning of Obama regarding the Surge.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/23/katie-couric-to-obama-peo_n_114520.html

Who does the media favor? Themselves, that's why their trying to kneecap Obama and prop up McCain as much as possible. It all comes down to ratings and profits.

user-pic

Anyone catch this gem on Halperin's site?

"What John McCain Needs to Win"
http://thepage.time.com/halperins-take-what-john-mccain-needs-to-win/

Key "says it all" line:

Note: This is analysis, not advice.

Yeah, right! Mark may not have drank the Kool-aid, but he sure had him some BBQ...

Obama supporters drink Kool Aid. The Press drink
their own product, Metamucil. It's all their dominant demographic allows them to sell.

user-pic

That was excellent my favorite was:
–For Obama to pick a running mate who doesn’t vet, who gets caught up in scandal, and/or who says stupid things.
That's why I'm rooting for Biden.

For Obama to pick a running mate who says stupid things.

Do you think McCain is available?

user-pic

He was 4 years ago...that's why I still can't figure out how he got the nomination...

SFC Wallace is still mad that the media did not cover the proof offered that the arrows which were planted in the 7th Cavalry came from Iran.

user-pic

It's funny that the "fake news" program The Daily Show may edit its interviews to make the interviewee look silly, but in their news portion they always add the "flashbulb" effect between cuts to show that something's been edited out. It's what responsible news organizations do.

Actually, when the Daily Show edited Bush and Bernake back to back with footage shot during a news conference Bush held to upstage Bernake's testimony before Congress there was a whole lot more "truthiness" and news involved than anything the laxative and geriatric pharmacology shills on the network news pass in prime time.

CBS news has become intellectually bankrupt longtime ago. Bob Scheifer is the final dry leaf fluttering on the dead tree- threatening to break and drift.

Even an undergrad knows- you edit the same'ol, same'ol, "already heard that one" part of the interview retaining the "new" news.

McCain was certainly making "new" news.

I have no doubt Katie Couric doesn't know shit about the timeline on the surge, so whatever her political leanings may be, she can be accused on intentionally not following up on the response.

Whatever little relevancy CBS news may have eroded a little further due to this episode.

One thing I realized is that the MSM wants a horse race and they will do anything to get it. McCain has been making gaffe upon gaffe but who am I to question is foreign policy credentials, when the press has already created an aura of experienced in foreign policy. The greatest myth on the campaign trail to date is: McCain’s verse experience on foreign policy.

I can't believe a credible news organization will totally edit out an answer just because they want specific narratives on the air.

CBS has totally lost it.

imagine if this was obama's gaffe?

user-pic

Oh good lord, if this was Obama's gaffe it would be all over the news.

But since McCain did it the media hides it like a pedophile hides his picture stash.

sad

user-pic

see how much coverage this gets, then get back with me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjzb61wfyN0

SFC Wallace is still mad that the media did not cover the proof offered that the arrows which were planted in the 7th Cavalry came from Iran.

I dumped ABC after the Charlie/George disgrace. No more Note, no more This Week. Now I will dump CBS. (I dumped CNN a long time ago.)

All I have now is MSNBC, TPM TV, and FORNER TV from ABROAD.

Amen to that bro

Two things: First, CNN's Anderson Cooper gave the story a good airing yesterday. His emphasis was on the factual inaccuracy of McCain's surge timeline, rather than on CBS's cover-up of his error.
But still, Cooper does occasionally grow a tiny pair.
Second, let's look at CBS's claim of innocence in jumping from Question A to Answer B.
Suppose McCain's Answer A had been accurate, concise and clear, and they had substituted a muddled Answer B.
Well, they wouldn't do that, would they?
Because the McCain camp would have instantly noticed -- and rightly denounced them for biased reporting.
So someone at CBS concluded they could get away with the edit they made, because the end result was to make McCain sound like less of an idiot.
The argument that they didn't know they'd caught him in a major gaffe doesn't hold water.

Schiefer a dry leaf? Leaf = fiber. Fiber = stool softener. Stool softener = CBS. Right on the money Kash.

And did you know Bob's brother Tom Scheifer was President of the Texas Rangers ball club while George Bush was managing partner. Dry leaves fall close to the trees, dead or not.

Careful narrowing your options. Teletubbies are a threat to the sanctity of marriage. Barney the Dinosaur is found in the Bible and compliments Creation Science, however.

Sure all news stations edit, but they don't all edit out the only news in the interview!

I use to watch Jane Pauley. Jane Pauley was a weak Barbara Walters. And Katie, you're NO Jane Pauley!

They've been telling us what they were all along, though hiding it in plain sight. It's not CBS it's See BS (Bull Shit)...

Let's not forget the obvious reason for the edit: The Number One Anchor for CBS Evening News had the presumptive Republican Party nominee for President caught in a lie... and didn't know it. The edits covered up Katie's incompetence in not knowing what happened when.

user-pic

You've got that absolutely correct.

If you're waiting for a correction from Couric tonight, don't hold your breath. She'd be admitting her ignorance about the events in Iraq.

user-pic

Fascism, pure and simple

I watched the "live" newscast of CBS news. I think they have a technical "out". They did say if you wanted to see the full interview for Obama and McCain to go to their website. They even showed directions on where to go.

I know this because I followed their directions, because I missed the first half of the news.

The full 23 minute Obama video and the full 14 minute McCain video are on the website.

Here is a link to McCain's interview:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/22/eveningnews/main4283813.shtml

At 2:56 into this Couric asks the question.

I found this last night, so it has been there.

But replacing one answer for another is dishonest all the way around.

Obama also got an edit: they deleted his answer to one are he thought he wasn't an expert on. It makes Obama look like Bush in the 2004 Kerry debate when Bush couldn't think of anything he did wrong.

What percentage of the television viewership do you think goes to watch the full interviews online? I don't have a clue, but imagine 5% is probably too high.

I'm glad that TPM is moving on this, but I really think this needs further coverage. NOT in some "CBS is in the tank for McCain" way, since that just seems loony. But moreso as an issue of how much we truly need a more aggresive level coverage of the depth of McCain's understanding of the war itself. It seems like he NEVER has the burden of proof on this issue, while Obama ALWAYS does. That's, to me, what this incident reveals. A kind of double-standard that manifests itself in terms of the kinds of expectations that people like Couric have when they sit down with McCain.

user-pic

stefran, I think you may have nailed it.

The CBS Evening News is in business to get ratings, which help them sell advertising time, which helps them make money.

They have more motivation to hide the failings of their famous anchor than to cover-up what would otherwise be seen as a feather in their cap, an "exclusive".

So I think the motivation was to avoid exposing Ms. Couric as being so gullible and uninformed that she didn't know to follow up with McCain on this ridiculous statement.

Better to just pretend like the whole thing never happened.

-- ARG

didnt he say because bill o said so? not obama.

Wishful thinking on our part? Actual link on CBS home page:

Last Day On The Job [ Couric & Co. ]

ac 360 has been good lately. just ignore gloria borger. two nights ago he had on peter bergen (cnn senior security analyst) to ocntradict the "silver bulletness" of the surge. last night he had joe klein and david gergen talk about the timeline gaffe of mccain. joe klein opined further that mccain's scurrilous remarks about obama was a first for a presidential candidate.

Dear CBS,

Indeed, news organizations edit extended interviews for time or print space.

So, please explain how your organization's editorial judgment to alter McCain's corresponding answer to Couric's question is more responsible or ethical than the Iranian government's recently edited number of long-range missiles.

Give me a reason to believe your interpretation of the truth again.

In the meantime, I'll be watching Countdown on MSNBC.

Thanks.


A LIE is not a "gaffe", Greg. We need to start differentiating between McCain the dumb ass and McCain the liar.

My open letter to CBS "News," sent this afternoon:

I was utterly dismayed at CBS' handling of a significant piece of news regarding the presidential campaign that arose during Ms. Couric's interview of Senator McCain. As a network news host, Ms. Couric's failure to follow up on Senator McCain's blatant misstatement regarding the "history" of the war in Iraq (as it pertains to the so-called "Anbar Awakening" and the so-called "surge") demonstrates a profound lack of knowledge by your lead newscaster, a complete lack of intellectual curiosity, or an utter lack of journalistic integrity.

But that glaring omission, as disappointing as it was, pales in comparison to your editorial decision to wipe Senator McCain's false statement from the televised record and send it "down the memory hole." Your decision to edit Senator McCain's falsehood out of your televised interview deprived Americans of a crucial piece of information regarding a major-party presidential candidate. Moreover, your decision to edit in a different answer to Ms. Couric's question (while playing the question to which Senator McCain responded with a lie) smacks of blatant bias in your news broadcast.

Ms. Couric's performance during that portion of the interview was inexcusable, Senator McCain's dissembling falsehood was a gross error in judgment, and your decision to conveniently excise those two blatant mistakes is the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. Count me among the Americans who will never again watch a single second of a CBS "News" broadcast. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

user-pic

This doesn't explain why CBS's editing seemed to turn it around on BHO and make it seem like he was the one who was wrong and misinformed.

Sure, CBS can chop and edit.....but how come they can take the plain facts, and McCain's plain gaffe....and turn it into a BHO is wrong, wrong, wrong on everything?

That's not just normal editing. They carefully remove good references for BHO, carefully remove F-Ups of McCains, then carefully replace the facts and the proof and the intentions of Maliki, History, etc....to arrive at McCain's preferred viewpoint.

Here's a copy of my letter.
Dear Sir or Madam:

While it is understandable for a newscast to edit for time. It is unconscionable for a news organization to substitute answers to questions that have a direct bearing on my ability to choose the person I wish to lead my country. This is not journalism and requires an abject and a public apology from whomever the decision-maker was, who literally put words in the mouth of a presidential candidate in a close race,

If you had tried this chicanery to make a candidate's answer appear to be less knowledgeable than their actual reply. You would rightly have been fined by the FCC for abusing your mandate. Keeping America in the dark about John McCain's lack of knowledge on his signature issue for this campaign amounts to the same thing.

Sincerely,

I corrected the typos before I sent it to CBS.

This is NOT editing for time. It is “catapulting the propaganda”. It is protecting the candidate from the reality and revelation that he is too old, and does NOT have a firm grip on the facts. And even issues that are supposedly his strong suit, he seems to have no real grasp of or knowledge about.

John McCain is experienced. However, none of that experience is actually relevant to being President of the United States.

He should just stick with his trophy wife and her hundred million $$$ and his 8 mansions and enjoy his retirement, and leave the actual governance thing to people who actually give a shit and know what they're doing.

CBS=Complete BS

See BS

This just in - McCain is sticking to his story and saying that what the Bush administration calls "the surge" was actually "made up of a number of components." McCain says some components of the surge began before Bush ordered more U.S. troops into Iraq.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080723/ap_on_el_pr/mccain

As long as you can redefine the time/space continuum, you will never be wrong again.

That spin attempt is ridiculous. That's not what he said.

McCain: I don't know how you respond to something that is as-- such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel MacFarland was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, that's just a matter of history.

McCain plainly states that because of the surge the US was able to protect "that Sheik and others". While it is fact that the Sheiks and their followers made their move weeks before any mention of a surge.

Even if you accept the premise that "The Surge" is an all encapsulating operation and not simply the addition of 30,000 or so troops, it still doesn't explain the fact that McCain claimed the additional troops allowed the Sunni sheiks to stand up to Al Qaeda - that is simply false. And "the surge" to McCain has always been the additional troops on the ground and nothing more.

In all seriousness this should end his campaign if the MSM didn't have a horse in the race and desperate for a close contest.

Alzheimer's.

This is shameful. The media has long been in love with McCain, and biased against Obama, and this is more proof of how far they will go to protect McBush, their darling.

Breaking News----FCC vows revenge after Judges void CBS fine for Janet Jackson Breast Exposure.
Plan investigation of CBS McCain Ass Coverage.

I think I've cracked the case - Katie Couric is a PUMA/Clinton Dead-Ender.

NYT actually has a piece up quoting from someone saying McCan't is 'three quarters correct.'

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/us/politics/24check.html

Would I kid you?

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address