« New Ad Lampoons McCain's Love Affair With Media | Home | Dem Challengers In Battle For House Enjoy Massive Financial Advantage »

Another Poll Shows Very Close Race In North Carolina

Another poll shows a very close race in North Carolina, a state that hasn't voted Democratic since 1976 -- suggesting yet again that Barack Obama could be on the cusp of dramatically expanding the map for Dems.

The new numbers from Public Policy Polling (D): McCain 47%, Obama 44%, and Barr 3%, with a ±3.4% margin of error. Four weeks ago, it was McCain 45%, Obama 41%, and Barr 5%.

The racial breakdown is very interesting in this poll, with Barack Obama getting 34% of the white vote compared to John Kerry's 27% in 2004. Black voters only make up 20% of the electorate in this poll, compared to 26% in 2004. If Obama can maintain the proportion of the white vote he has here, with an electorate that looks like 2004, he could win it in the end.

Late Update: For his part, Tom Jensen at PPP e-mailed us to say that he believes the figure showing African-Americans making up 26% of the electorate in the 2004 North Carolina exit poll was wrong. He believes the 20% estimate used here is more on target.


59 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Ok, Barrack Obama is the only candidate I can think of who has a chance to help us break through the Southern Strategy once and for all.

We've lost election after election since the Repugs started using race in every election. We have the opportunity to stop that and what will do it is turnout.

Tena: totally agree w/ you about turnout! NC is ripe for Obama but the key is to absolutley get the vite out. Last Saturday, we did voter registration at a huge festival and the Obama's campaign goal was surpassed easily by new registrations. My concern is the GOP's abilty to steal elections and voters surpression.

user-pic

Obama1st,

Thank you for what you are doing in NC!! 8-)

user-pic

I know, Joseph - I worry, too.

I am more concerned in this election about supression than I am Diebold - but polls that go back and forth as wildly as they have lately always make me very nervouse vis-a-vis Diebold.

user-pic

Funny you mention, check out what just started today in Virginia:

http://strategy08.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/va-gop-head-warning-people-not-to-register/

user-pic

O hell - tricks started inTexas during the primary - and it wasn't the GOP. It was Clinton's people using GOP tactics- they tried to repress turnout for the conventions.

I really don't see them being able to steal it here. We haven't had a Republican governor here since '93, and even he was a pretty high-minded sort for a Republican. Things can get a little more Republican as the local government level, and we do tend to send Republicans to Congress, but North Carolina doesn't really have much of a post-Voting Rights Act history of electoral shennigans.

I worry more about the fact that the median age for our poll workers is about 93 (bless their hearts).

Don't forget that we have some of the toughest ballot security laws in the nation, and that 75% of our counties use optical scan, thereby permitting paper recounts.

Our BOE is independent and putatively nonpartisan, so even if the Secretary of State hadn't been a Democrat, she wouldn't be able to do much.

Worried about purging or caging? Just last year, the US DOJ asked our state BOE to let them oversee a purge of our voter rolls, and our BOE told the Regency cabal to take a hike.

Because the governor is a Democrat, all of our county BOE's are controlled by Democrats as well.

Finally, we've got a pretty lax standard for provisional ballots to get counted, thanks to a state supreme court decision stemming from the 2004 election.

If anyone wants to pull a Florida here, I'd like to see them try. In fact, if it's that close here, we should all be grateful. Attempted election theft (and that's all it would ever be) would be a high-class problem in my book.

user-pic

Very good news. Having said that, I still think NC is going to be very tough, no poll has shown Obama over 44% there, so I tend to think that favors McCain.

Still, it's certainly close-enough to force McCain to invest time and resources, and those cross-tabs are encouraging.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

Why would there be less % of AA Turnout?

user-pic

26% is not accurate and is based on census exit polls rather than actual voter turnout data. In NC you can get the exact number because voter registration records are public info and include voting history and ethnicity.

The actual AA turnout in a general election is much closer to 20% (actually I believe it was even below 20% in the '04 election).

user-pic

Sorry Obama1st- I called you Joseph - I had a brain freeze moment and thought I was talking to Josephcast.

awww, shucks! And here I am. The "V for Vendetta" mask isn't too far off for me (obama1st's avatar). Big comic book and Alan Moore fan here! The Watchmen movie is gonna be sweet!!

user-pic

Oo - they are filming the Watchmen?

I'm mainly hooked on DC Vertigo series, but I love Alan Moore with all my heart, too.

What happened to "Stardust"? I thought they were filming already - that's a Neil Gaiman graphic, in case you didn't know...

watchmen trailer:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4blSrZvPhU

W. trailer:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2008/07/w-trailer-walk.html

(Hope this isn't a double post- stupid server).

Watchmen trailer (take two):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4blSrZvPhU

Good stuff. Should be a great election year movie, along with Oliver Stone's "W.".

"If Obama can maintain the proportion of the white vote he has here, with an electorate that looks like 2004, he could win it in the end."

Obama will easily have more than 26% for the black vote this year. Surely, the turnout will be higher this year. Thanks in part to an extended primary and higher voter registration this year.

If he keeps his white support, I think he's got this wrapped up. He could perhaps even lose some of it and still turn this out, depending on just how high turnout is their.

Turnout is the key this year. Get out and register some voters this fall, especially if you're in a swing state!!

Obama will easily have more than 26% for the black vote this year.

I wonder if you are misreading Mr Kleefeld's claim here. He is not saying that Kerry got 26% of the black vote in 2004. He is saying that black voters accounted for 26% of ballots cast in 2004. In other words, in order to win, Obama does not so much need to get more than 26% of the black vote (that would be easy), but rather he needs to get so many black voters to turn out to the polls that they amount to at least 26% of the total ballots cast. Still and all, that should be very doable, and I will be simply tickled pink if Obama can swing North Carolina into the blue column.

Like Tena above, I am feeling very excited about Obama's potential to lay waste to the Southern Strategy which the Republicans have too long used to poison this nation's politics. The realignment, when it comes, will be sweet indeed.

Er, now that I re-read the part of the post that I excerpted, I see that I was simply misunderstanding you, dear Joseph. Please disregard my reply. In any event, I agree with you that this state looks winnable. What a year this should be!

Yeah, that sentence was a bit tricky, glad you caught it. I misread it myself after I first wrote it. Then, I was like yeah, that's the point I want to make. :)

user-pic
Obama will easily have more than 26% for the black vote this year. Surely, the turnout will be higher this year.

I agree wholeheartedly - based on what happened in Texas during the primary.

People were voting for the first time ever in their lives - I stood next to one when I voted. He was an elderly African American man - he was so excited and proud.

Yeah, lot's of great stories to be told this year! More to come too.

North Carolina peeps- get out and register some Democrats!!

user-pic

We still need election reform. One thing that really ought to be addressed IMO, is giving felons who have served their time their voting rights back - it's insane disenfranchise these people. It makes no sense - it's like we take their citizenship and it just further alienates people who are already alienated from society and need a way in in order to stay out of prison.

Yeah, it's injust. Once they've served their time- they should be able to vote.

It's a permanent punishment, and we should be trying to reform criminals and make them valuable members of society. Taking away their right to vote permanently does little to promote reform. It's a permanent slap in the face. Why reform when you'll always be a second class citizen?

user-pic

It's crazy.

It's a good question how many would bother to vote- but that doesn't matter as far as I'm concerned. I simply do not get the reasoning behind it and never have. You're right - it's permanent punishment and that's unconstitutional.

So felons in Texas who have served their time cannot vote? I did not know that. I am working voter reg drives in Missouri and they told us at the orientation to stress to people that if they had finished serving their time, they were allowed to vote. In Indiana (where I worked voter reg during the primary) they were even more lenient - if you were not in jail, you could vote. I had not realized that in Texas they were disenfranchising folks like that. You are right; that has to change. It is not just.

Related story, regarding Virginia, Tim Kaine, and getting felons out to vote from June 17:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/16/AR2008061602535.html

Only Maine and Virginia allow convicted felons to vote, as far as I can tell.

Disregard. After more research it seems to vary a great deal state to state. Some never, some after 3 years after servingtimes, some while they are still behind bars. Never is pretty ridiculous and sad IMHO.

user-pic

That's true in a lot of states, though in the last decade or so there has been some movement in some states to reinfranchise ex-cons.

Florida I believe voted to do that last year.

Texas is the worst fucking goddamned backwards 3d world country when it comes to criminal law and what used to be known as the Dept. of Corrections. They call it something else now - can't remember. It's one of those Orwellian titles -

In NC, it's as soon as they get out of prison, whether on parole or because their term has ended. But it doesn't happen automatically -- they have to re-register, and a lot of folks on parole think they have to wait their entire term.

Eric, I know you're looking for news, but would you and the others there please ask yourselves (again, as I assume this is something you struggle with), whether there's much value in reporting polls as news.

They're not. I'm coming to believe that polls are part of a self-fulfilling media loop that keeps circulating bad information just to fill the news hole.

I would like to see an analytical piece that takes off on polls as a macro phenomenon, on how they often use contradictory or questionable sampling techniques, on the wide variation in skill and professional competence of the people behind them, and on the often partisan connections of the organizations.

In other words, pollsters and the new media are using each other, and I'd like to see TPM take a different approach. Turn the 'camera' on the pack, in other words, and show us how the sausage is being made.

I suspect it's a repulsive picture, if you really look at the truth. This would be public service journalism at it's most honorable.

Let's not get too excited here. I notice that this is a PPP poll -- a Democratic polling outfit. You usually have to "adjust" polls conducted by partisan outfits. My experience has been that partisan statewide presidential polls usually need to be adjusted by substracting two points from the partisan's candidate (Obama) and adding two points to his/her opponent (McCain). (Partisan statewide senatorial polls and partisan House district polls deserve even larger adjustments.) That would give McCain a seven point lead which, given the current national polls, seems more likely.

user-pic

He may or may not take NC, but he has a shot, that's alot more than could have been said about even Gore, a southerner. Bottom line is that republicans will have to spend caaaaasssshhhh defending not only NC, but also VA, GA, mountain states, republican midwest states, etc., etc., etc. The cash drain will help obama in traditional swing states in the end. Gotta love the obama strategy, brilliant!

user-pic

For NC, 49 to 42 still isn't all that bad. There's still a little over 3 months to go!

Yeah, but it's a Democratic year....

user-pic

Off topic and semi-old news. I've been tied up, but you gotta love honesty. This link is priceless, why can't an american general be so freaking blunt. It really wasn't rocket science and it cost hundreds of thousands of american and iraqi lives and billions and billions of dollars. Pathetic.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/28/rice-adviser-iraq-invasio_n_115398.html

Bingo.

This PPP poll is a Democrat poll, so add 5% to McCain's lead which would equal 8% lead for McCain.

And this was poll was taken durign Obama's trip, so his numbers here are inflated.

To echo others, Chuck Todd this morning (and even Buchannan and the Republican operative-turned-NBC analyst Mike Murphy)all seemed to agree that polling at this stage was useless.

Todd pointed to conversations he's had with Republican operatives who worry that Obama's numbers are being seriously UNDER-sampled, because his most likely voters aren't really paying attention yet, and generally people aren't willing to sit still for a 30-minute interview on the phone anymore.

In other words, sampling "likely" voters at this point is just an exercise in fantasy. Registered voters is a better metric, and even at that, turnout models from 2004 may prove to be wildly low. Obama's got the potential to turn out enormous numbers of new voters.. it's no guarantee, but he's got a much better chance of doing that than McCain. McCain's base is older white voters, who are the main source for all these polls right now.

user-pic

Obama definitely CAN win North Carolina. Again I think pollsters are underestimating the African-American turn-out. I would trust the PPO poll since they are from North Carolina.

PPO poll was pretty accurate in the primary.

Ok, Barack, Lets Go! Its all about the 50 state-strategy.

PPO polls?

I thing you meant PPP, but they're still biased polls in favor of Democrats just like Strategic Vision and POS polls are in favor of Republicans.

Bugmenot,

Do u want to be in Iraq for 100 yrs, more wars, higher taxes, more foreclosures and your civil liberties and rights eroded? Quit the drama and vote Obama.

user-pic
and generally people aren't willing to sit still for a 30-minute interview on the phone anymore.

Well no shit, Sherlock. Not only that, I'm convinced some people lie to pollsters, just because.

I do not trust polls - not one of them.

Thanks for all the help, John Edwards!

Living in and reporting from Western North Carolina, Obama is the only one here with adds running on TV. I am in the Greenville/Spartanburg (SC)- Asheville (NC) media market. Obama has a strong media presence on the television. Furthermore, Obama has offices open in Asheville, and a strong voter registration drive going here. McCain is nowhere on the scene at all. Given the conservative nature of this disctrict, though Heath Shuler, a conservative democrat is our representative; I am very impressed with the resources that Obama is putting into this district. Even if Obama doesn't win NC, he is definitely going to make sure that McCain has to fight for it.

North Carolina is a Red State. Nothing to see here. Move on.

-The Mainstream Media

"Obama has a strong media presence on the television. Furthermore, Obama has offices open in Asheville, and a strong voter registration drive going here. McCain is nowhere on the scene at all."

Excellent news, joelalexshel! Thanks for sharing.

It's all gonna come down to the ground game, folks!

user-pic
Thanks for all the help, John Edwards

You know, I just read something over at HuffPo that I had not heard one thing about until I read the story- John Edwards has a big problem on his hands, and potentiall, we do - there is a lot of red hot evidence, according to what I read - that he's been having an affair and the story is on the verge of breaking.

Long-time lurker, first commenter.

HTX, I don't see it as a problem for Obama, to be honest. Unless out of nowhere, he picks JE as his running mate (which won't happen), he's merely a surrogate at most, and it's a private matter. Certainly a major story, but definitely very Edwards-specific. Hard to tie to Obama.

I saw that too! I can only hope Obama's staff was savey enough to find this out early and that's why they didn't make him a factor early in the campaign!

I am not holding my breath on North Carolina...Obama need to do something extraordinary if he is to win North Carolina. I am still hopeful, though. Perhaps, the young voters can make the difference.

user-pic

Gbenga - I saw extraordinary things happen here in Dallas on primary night.

Extraordinary: one precinct in south Dallas saw 4000 people turnout for Obama. In 2004, that precinct saw a total vote of 68.

In my precinct, I was a poll watcher in '04 - about 350 people voted that year. The night I caucused for Obama, there were 1200 people there just in Obama's line. I think close 2000 turned out.

Extraordinary. Obama is an extraordinary candidate.

Great point. So, why Texas can't be turn blue?
If the african amercian and hispanic turnout is high, along with a reasonable share of the white vote, it can be done. Also, it could put Noriega in the senate.

Can Texas be a swing state?

Just asking.

user-pic

Yes, I think it can. The trend has been moving toward just that over the last two elections.

Even though Bush carried Texas without any trouble in '04, the Repugs began losing ground in '04 - Dallas Co. almost voted for Kerry - he carried the city and only lost the county by 1/10th of the total vote.

In '06 - Every major city and surrounding county voted a straight Democratic ticket - 49 Repugs judges in Dallas Co. lost their jobs to 49 Democrats.

If turnout is high enough among Texas Hispanics, we can do this. We are only 4 seats away from taking back the Texas Lege right now.

I would be surprised if African-Americans make up over 26% of the vote in North Carolina, and would be thrilled if they did. According to the 2000 census and projected 2005 numbers African-Americans make up 23% of the population in North Carolina.

I think probably that 2004 exit poll data is off, and hitting 26% would represent a surge of enthusiasm in and off itself. Let's say it's 25%, and do a bit of quick math:

.25*.95=.247 Obama needs .254 out of the remaining .75 to hit 50% FTW. So that's easy enough, just about 35%. Still, as I said, I am not particularly credulous of those 2004 exit polls.

On the other hand, where this poll does have me more optimistic is the Senate race, oddly enough. Looking at the internals, Hagan fares slightly better than Obama does among White voters, but she's only winning 62/25 among African-American voters. Bring that number back in line with Obama's and we've got a Democratic Senator from North Carolina.

user-pic
Late Update: For his part, Tom Jensen at PPP e-mailed us to say that he believes the figure showing African-Americans making up 26% of the electorate in the 2004 North Carolina exit poll was wrong. He believes the 20% estimate used here is more on target.

In other words, he just blasted his own poll all to hell because it has faulty data.


20% is more conservative, but better to be cautious I guess, from a pollster stand point.

However, if 26% from 2004 would be accurate (hard to say) then Obama is doing even better in NC than this poll would indicate (since this poll uses 20%). Assuming of course that extra 6% of black voters would by and large vote for Obama.

Of course, Jensen is sticking up for his poll and saying the 20% is accurate.

Who the hell knows?

I am voting for Obama.

However, I look at poll from a objective view point.

McCain is leading Obama by around 8% in NC. according to his poll.

New MoveOn video on McCain and Oil Lobbyists:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkUj9EIINIs

Featuring a Requiem for a Dream soundtrack. Good stuff! Good ad!

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address