« Dem Chances Increase For Key Virginia House Seat | Home | NRSC Head: Losing Three Senate Seats Would Be "Terrific" »

Will Republicans Use Footage Of Wright In Attack Ads? They Won't Say...

This is kind of fun: Check out how Republican National Committee chair Robert Duncan bobbed, weaved, ducked, and dithered when asked directly by reporters if the GOP would rule out use of footage of Reverend Wright in attack ads.

First Duncan made the obligatory high-minded noises about how, as John McCain himself has said, the GOP takes Obama "at his word" about Wright and won't make him an issue (though they will happily tar Obama with Tony Rezko and William Ayers)...

"We're talking about judgment; we're talking about association, but we're taking Senator Obama at his word about Reverend Wright, the fact that he said he didn't hear those sermons, the fact that he's disassociated himself from it," Duncan said.

"So that's not something you're going to hear me talking about. I am going to talk about Rezko and Ayers and all of the others."

Ahhh, but wait...

But when he was asked whether he'd pledge not to use videos of Wright's sermons in ads, Duncan refused.

"Well, why at this point would I answer a question like that? It's not my intent. I have no intent, and will not make race a part of this campaign. I'll say it that way," he said.

Do McCain and the Republicans view Wright as fair game, or not? I don't know why we can't get some straight talk on this question...


71 Comments

| Leave a comment

Well, it worked very well for the GOP in the recent house races and it sure helped Hillary, so, have at it...

Indeed, let them put all their [scarce] monetary resources into it.

Yeah, and McCain definitely needs something to set himself up a little higher on the political ladder. What about the VP's. Has Barack or John come any closer to choosing? You can check out the 2008 election poll I run at http://www.votenic.com, but reply to me and let me know who you think should back Barack/McCain.

user-pic

Die, spammer, die!

user-pic

Fuck off spammer.

Yes, you're right. That worked really well. They will keep trying the same tired tactics things expecting a different outcome. That is the very definition of what???

user-pic

Note that Duncan is blatantly lying about Rezko. There was no "sweetheart deal." So-so job of explaining it on the part of McClatchy as well.


"I'd like to talk about Rezko in Chicago, the fact that he was one of the early supporters of Obama, helped him get started gaining this sweetheart deal for the house that he bought.

Rezko is a Chicago businessman who contributed to Obama and raised money for him. He also sold a piece of property to Obama that was next to Obama's home. His conviction wasn't related to Obama.

I mean, shit, is the GOP really planning on running the exact same campaign against Obama as Hillary did?

Yes.

Good to know. Wake me on January 20.

Pretty much. Except with worse positions on the issues.

What other kind of campaign could they run?

user-pic

By all means, write off any attempt at regaining African American voters, or United Church of Christ members (of which I am one).

So much for extending Karl Rove's 2004 "faith based initiative" outreach to AA churchgoers!

user-pic

I think the McCain campaign has already written off the African American vote. But why do you think using Reverend Wright will turn off African American supporters of Obama more than it will white supporters? Senator Obama has rejected Reverend Wright and he has left the church. Are you suggesting that he is the only African American in this country who would reject the Reverend? I don't buy that; I am going to believe absent real non-anectdotal evidence to the contrary that Senator Obama's actions were in accord with the great swath of African Americans in this country who loathe racism in all of its hideous forms, including the venom spewed from the mouth of the good Reverend Wright.

user-pic
I think the McCain campaign has already written off the African American vote.

I'm not so sure. Otherwise why would McCain have bothered to give a speech on that Memphis balcony on April 4? Unless he's just relying on the old wink, wink routine where he takes the high road with MLK but lets his surrogates etc. go down the low road with Wright.

BTW I'm not saying any one group would be more turned off by these ads than another, just that both would likely be. FWIW I'm white and my UCC congregation is mostly white and my sense is that most of the congregation was offended by Clinton's demagoguing on the Wright issue (which had an obvious racial overtone aside from whether you agreed with Wright or not).

user-pic

Tom Joad's somber face gives your comments so much more gravtas, bslev.

"racism in all of its hideous forms, including the venom spewed from the mouth of the good Reverend Wright."

Oh, please. This is so over the top that you sound ridiculous.

I can't believe there are so many liberals who are horrified by a black man denouncing the U.S. for its treatment of his people. Maybe you should familiarize yourself with white America's historical treatment of African-Americans before you get all in high dudgeon about the Reverend Wright.

McCain says he can't use a computer without assistance.

So how is he going to google the internets and discover that Bobby Jindal is a Hindu and an exorcist?

Hardball, huh?

If they do that, then somebody -- because Obama won't do it, or approve it -- should run ads featuring how John McCain treated his first wife, Carol. Perhaps featuring Ross Perot. From the Daily Mail piece

But Ross Perot, who paid her medical bills all those years ago, now believes that both Carol McCain and the American people have been taken in by a man who is unusually slick and cruel – even by the standards of modern politics.

‘McCain is the classic opportunist. He’s always reaching for attention and glory,’ he said.

‘After he came home, Carol walked with a limp. So he threw her over for a poster girl with big money from Arizona. And the rest is history.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html

Newt Gingrich also deserted his wife...presented her divorce papers when she was in the hospital recovering from uterine cancer surgery. Newt eventually got what was coming to him. Hopefully mcsame will follow in his footsteps.

Will Republicans Use Footage Of Wright In Attack Ads?
-- They will have no choice but to go negative, Negative, NEGATIVE! Repubs will see that -- by Labor Day -- they will have absolutely nothing to lose.

Bring it on!

Oh God, please don't go there...

user-pic

At some point, America has to get wise to this if we're going to get the leadership we deserve. And McCain, if hopes to salvage any respect, will stop this. I've always known the Republican party to completely write off entire blocs of Americans (Blacks, Latinos - but not Cubans!, unmarried women), and the only way they'll stop is if it isn't allowed to work.

Fight the power.

At some point, America has to get wise to this if we're going to get the leadership we deserve.

Just what we deserve is a pretty subjective and slippery determination.  Seems like in the past, we've often gotten worse than we deserve.  It wouldn't surprise me to find that, once in a while, we get better than we deserve.  Like maybe this time.

America (and the world) will indeed get more wise with time, but it's likely to be a bumpy road -- lots of ups and downs, but a generally upward trend.  One salient increment in wisdom should come with the more-widespread realization that Republicans are mostly a bunch of con men (see Dubya's approval ratings).

And McCain, if hopes to salvage any respect, will stop this.

McSame doesn't strike me as very respect-oriented.  So, color me pessimistic.

I'm no apologist but it's important to keep things in perspective (from Wiki)....

"In 1961 Wright left college and joined the United States Marine Corps and became part of the 2nd Marine Division attaining the rank of private first class. In 1963, after two years of service, Wright joined the United States Navy and entered the Corpsman School at the Great Lakes Naval Training Center.[11][7] Wright was then trained as a cardiopulmonary technician at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Wright was assigned as part of the medical team charged with care of President Lyndon B. Johnson (see photo of Wright caring for Johnson after his 1966 surgery). Before leaving the position in 1967, the White House Physician, Vice Admiral Burkley, personally wrote Wright a letter of thanks on behalf of the United States President."


user-pic

Yes, but Obama can no longer offer that in defense. He cut Wright off - and justifiably so. So they can't very well come back with a bit on his military service.

I concur, it's not a defense. But those that don't know, I thought I'd post it, always best to see the whole picture- God knows the MSM won't.

Fun fact: in the picture of Reverend Wright caring for President Johnson, the guy right behind Wright is Johnson's Press Secretary, Bill Moyers.

Yeah, they will use Wright. And they will use race. It's inevitable.

Obama needs to focus his responses now. The right just went after James Johnson and basically won. Now they've switched to the other guy on the VP search committee.

Obama needs to firm up the backbone and not let the Right dictate the flow of the campaign.

On the positive side, McCain is still not selling any positive rationale for his own candidacy. Just a constant attempt to tear down the other guy.

At this point no one can answer: Why John McCain? Including his own campaign.

user-pic
But when he was asked whether he'd pledge not to use videos of Wright's sermons in ads, Duncan refused. "Well, why at this point would I answer a question like that? It's not my intent. I have no intent, and will not make race a part of this campaign. I'll say it that way," he said.
Wait a minute...who said anything about making race an issue in the campaign? The question was whether the RNC would use video clips of Jeremiah Wright in its ads?

The Wright clips could be used to paint Obama as unpatriotic (i.e., "God damn America!") or radical ("Chickens coming home to roost."). The initial clips of Rev. Wright weren't so much about race as they were about American foreign policy generally.

I don't see any indication in this article from Duncan that the Wright sermon tapes won't show up in RNC ads. You can put money on it that they will be used...

That line caught my eye too. It effectively rebuts the ad by itself :)

Is that how the Republicans are trying to cover up their economic and foreign policy disasters? By fabricating Obama's connections? To impress a few drunk hillbillies and give them a laugh at bars?

user-pic

Make a straight ahead deal. You attack wrightt, we attack Dobson, Robertson, Hagee, Parsley and the whole host of deranged rightwing nazi christian pastor-haters. It's simple and clear. Attack the right-wing-nut pastors. There's plenty out there.

user-pic

Another interesting point:

"Well, why at this point would I answer a question like that? It's not my intent. I have no intent, and will not make race a part of this campaign. I'll say it that way," he said.

Nice to see him acknowledge (without being asked apparently) that the GOP knows that the Wright attacks are about race. They'll deny it when they actually do them, of course, but for now it's almost refreshing.

Utterly predictable. The Republican Party is so pathetically desperate, so morally and intellectually bankrupt, that they have no choice but to resort to these kinds of base attacks, these appeals to the worst aspects of human nature.

Fortunately for the Dems, this year they have a candidate who won't simply sit back and take it, a candidate who has learned from his predecessors' mistakes, a candidate who will take these attacks head-on and ensure that they do not dominate the political discourse from now until November.

Not this time.

user-pic

It just boggles my mind (when I think of what a pack of perverted sexual miscreants the Republicans are) why the Dems don't simply hire a pack of private investigators to expose them all. Revealing all the weirdness and perversion of the Republican operative corps would certainly send a clear message that, as they say in high school: "we're fired up/won't take no more!" Pluse it would be tremendously entertaining and keep the sickness of the Republican swine in full public view.

Speaking of slime attacks, here's a letter from Rezko to the judge in his case, saying that the Feds were pressuring him to incriminate Obama. To no avail:


http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Rezko_Feds_pressured_to_incriminate_Obama.html

>>>I'll say it that way

Mmmmmliar

Using Wright as an attack could backfire with the Evangelicals because Hagee and Parsley both said some ridiculous things when parsed and taken out of any context. Also McCain would have to admit that he reached out to both for purely political reasons (whereas Obama sat in Wrights pew for 20 years) which will out him as a pandering phony to the Evangelicals.

I think the best counter-attack would be to cherrypick Hagee and Parsley inflammatory remarks and put them in a commercial and then close with a message saying that anybody can be made to be a loon when cherrypicking quotes without any context and like Hagee and Parsley there was so much more to Rev. Wright and Trinity church then what opponents would lead you to believe.

Also by the GOP attacking Obama with Wright they are dispelling the whisper campaign that Obama is a Muslim.

user-pic

You make some very good points. I especially like what you propose in your second paragraph, Jonze.

Peoples' Fast Songbird Boat People for Truth

Engines fired up and ready to go.

It's interesting that he brought up race considering the question was specifically about Wright and not race.

Slimebag.

Greg, Eric and Co:

While TPM’s motives are unquestionable, there is more than reasonable evidence to question your intelligence in headlining these stories.

Anyone here, If you think Repug’s won’t use Wright, Rezko and Myers raise your hand?

This is a non-story.

In fact, McZombie has already invoked Mark Rich and Eric Holder in one sentence.

Does anyone remember Horld Ickes- Wright is a fair game with the superrs- TPM "exclusive"?

Anyone here, If you thought Harold Ickes wouldn’t use Wright raise your hand?

That was a non-story.

Before fellow bloggers come to bite me- I don’t have problem with publishing the story. And I don’t care it’s a front page headline. But TPM, apart from the relentless focus on Hillary legacy and Obama vulnerabilities, should also used their research and investigation abilities in exposing McCain associations, dealings and questionable links (not crap like pastor associations, but his lobbying links, Iraq blunders, Bush-McCain relationship etc.)

Though I ain’t a big fan of Huffpo- I have to say they have done a decent job in the last few weeks zeroing on McCain.

This is just a usual fear card- Total B.S. By the way, Where the heck is the Whitey tape?

user-pic

Using Wright is using race, and yes that is what the Repukes are going to do - of course it is.

All they know how to do is to pander to our worst instincts. They'll play on people's fears about "scary black men" just like they did about "scary Muslims" and they'll combine the two - it's inevitable.

And they will in fact scare some old white ladies and some angry white guys will get angrier.

but it will fall far short of what the Repukes need to win.

user-pic

"Will the Republicans use footage Of Wright In attack ads?"

"Yes, in a heartbeat."

This has been another in the [Atrios] series of simple answers to simple questions.

With the average American smarting from high food and oil prices I don't believe the comments of Rev Wright will matter that much come November.

The only people who will buy into that are the morons who watch Fake News, and they had no intention on voting for the dark skinned man in the first place.

The Republicans play to THEIR worst instincts, not OURS.

They are what they are: not conservatives, but neoconservatives with a frightening world view and the desire to rule through fear.

Have a little faith and blog the Hell out of every Swift Boat attempt. Obama will fight back with the truth and that will be enough.

user-pic

If you thought I meant that everyone would have their fears successfully played on, you didn't read my comment.

That's not what I said. I agree they play on their own fears - but they are stupid enough to think that it translates to a more general angst. It worked with 9-11, for awhile. I'm not saying it will work this time - I don't think it will. In fact, I don't think there is very much the Repugs can do.

We're getting the country back.

Well, if they use Wright who is not Obama, then the Dems should use this info.

John McCain
Summer 1958: Graduates fifth from the bottom of his Naval Academy class and is commissioned as officer.

April 2, 1987: Meets with federal regulators, along with four other senators, on behalf of developer Charles Keating, in attempt to head off investigation into Keating's Lincoln Savings and Loan. Keating had raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for McCain campaigns and Cindy McCain and her father had invested even more money with Keating's businesses.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/election08/articles/09170914elections08-mccain.html

Cindy McCain
In 1994, Mrs. McCain admitted that she had solicited prescriptions for painkillers from physicians who worked for an international charity that she founded, the American Voluntary Medical Team. She then filled the prescriptions in the names of her staff.


http://www.commondreams.org/views/021400-102.htm

user-pic

Rev. Wright never charged me $4 a gallon for gasoline, or sent our troops to die in Iraq, or melt-down the mortgage industry, or tanked the dollar, or hired lobbyists to run a campaign, or be in league with a S & L criminal who bilked us taxpayers out of over $3 billion (1989 dollars) in loses, or voted to invade Iraq...

<GOP>Gas is at $4/gallon because God damned America as requested by Rev. Wright</GOP>

Fox Radio - Obama and Wright Had Gay Relationship; Used Crack Cocaine!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=redxWMNMS0U

It seems as if the Republicans are getting their knickers in a knot over Michelle Obama. And getting ready to take aim at her over the next few months. But maybe they should take a look in the mirror and ask themselves what are they so “proud” of? Maybe they should revisit what Michelle Obama has seen from her American leaders since she was born the year after President Kennedy got killed. And then, no matter what they come up with and manage to spin, I’ll still take a straight shooter who doesn’t mince words - the Michelle way. That’s American. That’s the American way. And the choice of spouses also tells me loads of the candidates themselves. And not the way you think. http://angryafrican.net/2008/06/12/michelle-not-a-stepford-wife/

Will the sun rise in the east tomorrow?

Will Republicans Use Footage Of Wright In Attack Ads?  They Won't Say...

Howz you knowin dat?  You sure you been talkin wit all of em???

Jus dig a lil harder an youz bounda find some poor schmuck sayin, "I will!  I will!"

Is the GOP ready for the return volley - Hagee et all to rebut any Wright footage - Lobbyists running McCain's campaign - How about his Veep team - a campaign manager accused by the government in 2005 of undermining the national interests - and on and on. They will learn very quickly it's not advisable to throw stones when you live in a glass house.

I'm a big Obama supporter but let's face it, Rev. Wright is in play and will be use endlessly by the Repubs... It's a fact of life, get ready to see plenty of the Rev. and the endless whispering campaigns about Islam and patriotism...

Obama '08