« GOP Senator Questions Obama's Bipartisanship -- But He Repeatedly Worked With Obama! | Home | Bleak House: GOP Prospects For Holding House Seat Grow Worse And Worse »
The Last Dem Presidential Candidate To Campaign In Alaska? J.F.K.
Here's yet another potential Obama-JFK comparison for you.
If Obama does actually end up campaigning in deep-red Alaska, as his state director said he might do later this summer, he'll join a rarefied club that includes exactly one other member: The 35th President of the United States.
Our readers have rendered their verdict: The last -- and only -- Democratic Presidential candidate to campaign in Alaska was John F. Kennedy, during the 1960 campaign against Richard Nixon.
You can read the speech JFK gave in that state on September 3rd of that year right here.
Advertisement






















Probably just wants the backdrop of himself in AK, with Anwar, etc to emphasize energy, rather then hoping to win Alaska's handful of electoral college votes.
June 26, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
could also be 50 state strategy stuff.
June 26, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm going to just go ahead and pencil in Obama in Alaska on Sept. 3.
June 26, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could be either one of those things or something else - I don't care, I like it.
I know what it's like to be ignored during a presidential campaign and you cannot win a state you ignore. There's no guarantee you'll win it if you don't ignore it, but I can guarantee that if it's not Vermont or some other solid blue state, you're better off not ignoring it.
June 26, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg,
I agree w/ you. I think Obama will do the 50 state campaign and let the entire country know he will be the president for everyone and help turn Alaska at least purple if not blue!
June 26, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
cool
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/mccain-versus-the-internet/
June 26, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
well...alaska wasn't even a state until 1958, so JFK was probably jsut stopping by to welcome them into the electoral college and to welcome them to participate in the process.
That said, given the fact that there are maybe 60 people in the whole state, its not a great place to spend resources youdont have. Probably why no dem has campaigned there since kennedy.
But obama does have the resources, so why not?
June 26, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I bet my cousin in Juneau will be excited.
June 26, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The other thing about this is that - while I too have been pretty disappointed in Obama's lack of fight early in this campaign vs. McCain - I think that local visits with local TV and newspapers carries a lot of weight. At this point in the game, I can understand his campaigns strategy to get on the ground in key states talking about key issues and not worry so much about the national temperature gauge of the country if you will.
He's still trying to get people to know him and he seems to be taking on the Iowa approach, only this time there are 50 states. Since it's June/July, he has some time to do this. BUT...he has to be sure to balance his messaging, advertising, and most importantly, HE needs to be the one that's on the offensive. He can't allow McCain to continue to define the debates.
This isn't Clinton anymore where he treated her with kid gloves since it was dem vs. dem. This is now McCain...the guy whose flipped on every issue he supposedly stands for. They need to hit him and hit him hard over this.
Again, being July, they have some time do not do this, but they better be getting ready to come hard at McCain. At the end of the day, I think/pray/hope that what happens to him is what happens to Bush.
That's to say, like Bush, McCain is still liked by a lot of people and has a good percentage right now. But once people know him more and develop a negative attitude of him, it's very, very difficult to get those people back on board. See Bush's approval rating.
June 26, 2008 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty Cool Stuff, really.
June 26, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Begs the question, though: Do Republican presidential candidates campaign in Alaska very often either?
June 26, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a memory, which I can't confirm via (the) google, that Bill Clinton visited all 50 states in campaigning for the presidency. Can anyone confirm?
There is this
Exchange with reporters in Anchorage, Alaska - Pres. Bill Clinton - Transcript from 1996.
June 26, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know that I relish JFK comparisons -- he only managed a win because the Daley machine turned out the cemetery vote.
I want an honest to God blowout!
June 26, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a terrific fucking idea!
June 26, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The last poll taken only had him down 4 in AK. Looks like it could be worth a trip to me.
June 26, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
SNM, remember that Obama is from Chicago and Daley is mayor still. Or again. Or something.
Obamacadavers could be the key to this whole thing.
Dead people rule!
June 27, 2008 1:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Between the scandals of Ted Stevens, Don Young and Laura McCann...plus the GOP push to open the ANWR, I think that puts the normally "safely republican" state of Alaska very much into play.
By dedicating at least SOME time and resources into Alaska, it puts the GOP on the defensive, fighting to preserve a 'win', rather than fighing to secure a 'battleground' state. Yes, this is the Dean 50 state strategy and I believe that it will work, especially against a campaign who is geared to fight in 5-10 states and leave the rest to their own devices.
June 27, 2008 3:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, he's extremely close in opinion polls, and there's precisely one popular Republican in the state, and she isn't running for President, and campaigning there is easier than it looks because half the population lives in one city that has exquisitely spectacular views and would make a great campaign rally site, and there are a lot of close downticket candidates who would really appreciate it.
So really I would be more surprised if he DIDN'T go than if he did.
June 27, 2008 8:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
With Stevens' and Young's corruption scandals ongoing and a very strong D candidate in Begich, Barack's efforts will help Ds snatch a Senate and a House seat next November.
June 27, 2008 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can Hawaii, his birthplace, be far behind?
Has a candidate ever run for President without visiting where he was born? Possibly both will this time, unless McCain has a hankering for visiting the Panama Canal Zone.
June 27, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink