« Asked If He Questions Obama's Patriotism, McCain Doesn't Directly Answer | Home | New Obama General Election Ad Stresses The "Dignity" Of Work »

Surprise! McCain Camp Keeps Hitting Wes Clark Comments, Despite Obama's Disavowals

Here's the McCain campaign's response to Obama's rejection of Wes Clark's comments about McCain's military record...

"Of course Barack Obama has called many times for a new kind of politics, but his campaign just hasn't lived up to it. We've learned we need to wait and see what Senator Obama actually does, rather than take him at his word."

Can you believe it? The McCain camp isn't accepting Obama's disavowal of Clark's comments!

I was certain that the McCain campaign would respond by saying: "Okay, we appreciate Obama's response, and Clark's comments are now a dead issue. Let's get back to talking about the issues." (Editor's note: Please tone down the sarcasm. Way too heavy-handed.)

Late Update: Here's McCain speaking about the whole controversy at today's press conference:


123 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Woah, when did Greg Sargent turn into Greg Snark-gent?

user-pic

Follow-up: Here's what Greg and Josh are missing.

Obama ALREADY found the way to neutralize McCain's service. He would praise it, then move on to slam McCain on the issues, almost all of which favor Obama. He would go after McCain's other supposed "strengths" - that he's a straight-talker and a maverick.

And guess what: IT WORKS! McCain's been reminding people about his time as a POW at every turn for months, but was still getting no traction. Obama has still been ahead.

Obama wants to get back to the tactics that were already working. It's as simple as that.

Hear, hear! Somebody with the same subtle bent of mind as me to understand exquisitely subtle Sen. Obama ;-) (I mean it, the smiley is only a take down of my own pomposity, not that I do not deserve it :)

Anyway, the point is that we do not need to become our most loathed foes to win a campaign. There is at least some evidence that the public is beginning to ignore the media and Rethug ginned bloviations and keep their eye on the ball (most famously in the 2006 elections).

Sen. Obama seems to totally recoil from passing judgment on anyone's military service; he also seems to want the campaign conducted on the ideas that the two of them have for the future, granting that they are both "qualified enough" for the job. This has many advantages, not the least of which is that the focus is in the right place to determine the right person for the job. Given that the two of them are major party* nominees, we can stipulate to their qualification for the job.

* One party (the Democrats, the Democrats) of course does a far better job of picking a qualified candidate than the other (the Rethugs, the Rethugs).

And that's when the Obama campaign should ask the McCain campaign to directly answer the question about Obama's patriotism.

So? Let the McCain campaign keep harping on the comments. The more the media repeats Clark's line - "I don’t think getting in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to become president" - the more likely it is people start to think "you know, maybe that Clark fellow's got a point".

As for Obama, he's simply playing good cop to Clark's bad cop.

Quoth Andrew Sullivan:

Strictly speaking, it is irrelevant for the presidency if someone was shot down and tortured. It doesn't make anyone a better potential president. But there are plenty of ways to put this and to frame this without descending to a default position that seems to devalue McCain's service. Clark is a dreadful politician and his off-the-cuff response, while technically true, is terrible politics and about the last debate Democrats need or should want to have. It has dominated a news cycle in ways that help McCain not Obama and drowned out Obama's patriotism speech. The only silver lining is that the small chance that Clark might be an Obama veep is now zero.

Ok, McCain gets his cheap shot press release. Not really concerned. The story is still dying down.

If, however, Obama decided to double down, this story would only be exploding, and news coverage for the next few days would be discussion about whether Obama's campaign is denigrating McCain's service.

I know having a shitty media sucks, but you have to know how to pick your battles in the environment that faces you. Greg is evidently not a professional campaign manager, and posts like this demonstrate why that is...

user-pic

Great point Stroszek - lost in the mix of our tunnel-vision is just how little this dust-up will matter even a week from now.

Exactly.

I'm disappointed in how this turned out, but I attribute it to Clark's poor phrasing. He has the potential to be a devastating surrogate, but Schieffer played him like a fiddle and now we're paying the price for Clark's inartful execution.

user-pic

Yes.

Here's all most people are going to hear of Gen. Clark's interview:

"Well, I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president," Clark replied.

I hope you can see that taken out of context, as it already has been, that statement just doesn't sound very good. It sounds ungrateful and begrudging. Many people would disagree with Clark's statement on its face as well, thinking that that sort of heroic military service IS a qualification.

That's the statement the Obama camp would be forced to defend. If it was just the rest of what Clark said and not this sentence, I think they may well have had a different judgment on how to play it.

You always have to be sensitive to how these things are going to be perceived by two very different groups: 1. the mainstream media (MSM), and 2. Low-information voters.

Exactly. TalkingPointsMemo and HuffingtonPost isn't taken seriously by the rest of those in the media, so whatever concerns about a particular news coverage they voice WILL NOT be carried on those talk shows.

You and Josh ask why the Obama campaign isn't hitting McCain directly on his war service, and you only have to look to the traditional media this morning for your answer.

Almost EVERY newschannel was bleating in anger about the perceived 'attack' on McCain's record. When McCain's got the media in his defense like that, how are you going to respond without being painted as some sort of scurrilous anti-patriotic bastard?

user-pic

Bingo. It was a trial balloon and the MSM shot it down fast. When it came to John Kerry it was fair game, but St. John McCain's credentials cannot be questioned. Obama was getting more traction elsewhere.

user-pic

I don't think it was a trial balloon. I think clark just made a mistake. Hopefully, he learned a lesson. Praise him as a hero for serving his country and then tear down his policies as nothing more than a 3rd bush term. It really isn't rocket science.

user-pic

You're 100% right.

Praise him as a hero for serving his country and then tear down his policies as nothing more than a 3rd bush term.

I know, Sen. Obama was doing this so beautifully and effectively, that it is a huge disappointment that those who are on his side did not learn this lesson.

People who keep referring to Sen. Obama as a rookie really surprise me, because, he conducts his campaign effectively and on an even keel, while all the so-called pros are crashing and burning on the wayside...

Exactly, if the media didn't suck so much then Clark's comment wouldn't be a problem in the first place.

The sucky media, I got used to.

But what the netroots keep doing to Sen. Obama, I just cannot even begin to comprehend...

The MSM is doing what it does. And so are the netroots. But, Obama is riding it out and playing the dynamics with some finesse, I think. Time will tell, but I believe that by late August, we will be again marvelling at how well he's played the various hands that he's been dealt this summer.

Me either. It's driving me insane. The Left loves to eat its own and it's doing a brilliant job of it these days. On FISA, Obama wasn't pure enough for them, now with this kerkuffle, he's too weak. The man is hardly a few weeks into the GE and already he's been thrown out with the bathwater.

I'm not saying we should not be critical of his campaign or his positions, but so much of these responses are just as much of the same-old hand-wringing that is the classic self-defeating Democratic way, as they accuse Obama as politics as usual and a Kerry redux.

We can DO this people. And so can Obama. Wake up. He is a politician. He is running a GE campaign. You will not agree with 100% of his words, policies or actions. This does not mean he is not worthy of your vote to get rid of 8 years of BushCoFascism.

user-pic

so instead of listening to your editors and reworking your postings according to their constructive criticism, you just post it as is with the editors notes included?

thats...um...well i'm not sure what it is but its something, alright.

user-pic

If I were editor I'd have him not use the word "issue" in two sentences in a row. Just sayin'

This is a website. "Editors notes" are something you use in a very different kind of publication: If the TPM "editors" wanted to signal displeasure with something Greg had written, they would have contacted him on instant messenger or just edited the article themselves. The "editor's note" was clearly someone (probably Greg) trying to be funny.

Indeed, I think it is just Greg, tongue-in-cheek...

What if Clark had said the opposite. McCain's service and POW status does make him more qualified to be commander in chief. If so why doesn't the Navy make all returning POW's Admirals?

Well, that's all peachy-keen.

Any chance we can stop assisting McCain in his, thus far, successful mission to keep Obama from getting any traction on his patriotism speech? Or are we all just so completely disillusioned and funked out by his failure to do every singtle thing the netroots thinks he should do that we're just going dispense with maybe telling us what he said, printing the text, or giving us a link?

It's not just TPM. Everybody on the MSM and the Intertubes seems so fucking obsessed with what Wes Clark said yesterday that Obama might as well not made the speech at all--notwithstanding that he's giving it in Missouri, the state where hat Josh has been bitching about Obama's failure to go sufficiently toe to toe with St. John.

No joke, you can get the transcript here, http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gG55dC

Great. We can go to Obama's website and get it.

The problem is that, for reasons of their own, as far as the MSM and the blogs are concerned, he might as well not said any of the stuff that doesn't somehow concern the way Wes Clark walked into Bob Schieffer's protect trap.
The MSM is obsessing on rallying around their sainted John McCain. The blogs are busy doing their all new "We're So Disillusioned Moan" variant on the traditional Democratic Chicken Dance.

God, I can tell already, its going to be a long, stupid summer.

Steve, you're one of my favorite commenters. But do you really have anything positive to say about the general election campaign Obama has waged up to this (admittedly, very early) point?

Somehow he's went from campaigning like John Kennedy to campaigning like John Kerry in the space of a month.

It would be nice if you would provide evidence of this judgement. His speech today was very Kennedyesque, and I think his campaign is doing fine. Also, what's so bad about John Kerry? It's ironic to me that Democratic supporters fall for the GOP smearing of their own. That to me is the real reason why we lose time and time again, not the quality of our candidates.

Kerry lost. Pointing that out and suggesting that he may have won if he had done some things differently is hardly a "smear."

I was, and am, a big fan of John Kerry's. Get over yourself.

You didn't sound like a fan. You sounded like you were denigrating him the way you sounded like you're denigrating Sen. Obama. And the point I was trying to make - which has now been made in a very good post here - is that helping spread negative ideas and attitudes about candidates loses them votes. I feel - especially within the last week - a lack of faith in the Democratic Party and its presidential nominee that's disheartening (and undeserved). If it continues of course it could affect the election outcome.

I don't know yet.

A political campaign is a shadowpupppet show and the audience is not us--it's the MSM and, now, the bloggers (some of them, at least). We are not even spectators at that show. Instead, we sit outside and try to make judgments about whether we like the show based on glimpes we get through the window and what the people who are actually in the audience periodically come out tell us about it.

Some of the people in the audience think the whole reality is the shadows. Others are at a vantage point where they can see the puppets. They sneer at the naivete of those who believe the shadows are important and, instead, knowingly describe the puppets in great detail for us. Still others actuallyknow the puppeteers and think the "real" story lies in what the puppeteers tell them. Once in a while, one of the puppeteers steps out and talks to us directly.

In the final analysis, it doesn't matter when, or whether, the people who are actually in the audience applaud. What matters is whether we people sitting outside applaud at the end.

A lot of people were absolutely convinced from about June through December of last year that Obama was totally blowing it because they confused the shadows with the whole reality.

That's a fair point, but my point has been that we've seen in the past 5 or 6 days is the Republicans scrambling to cover McCain's ass after a couple campaigning errors and some bad poll numbers. The beltway media was more than happy to go to the mat with these attacks, even the ones they didn't believe in, as it was something "interesting" to report. Meanwhile, although Obama responded, his response didn't have anywhere near the footprint of even the most scurrilous of the attacks last week.

Now, given a choice between Lieberman channeling Dick Cheney and outright saying that if Obama is elected, we will be attacked by terrorists (with a nod to Clinton's Day One metric thrown in) and Wes Clark making a true statement about McCain not being automatically qualified to be President because his plane was shot down, they're all over Clark with barely a peep about Lieberman.

That's a problem. It's a problem Obama will have to asses and come up with a real strategy to combat, but his response can't be muted or look defensive in October.

That's the problem I have with what's going on right now. It's not the end of the world, but it needs to be addressed.

It's a problem Obama will have to It's a problem Obama will have to assess...
*sigh*

No, I totally agree with that.

One other related point, however is that being the Democratic presidential nominee in the age of the Internet is worse than being (okay, almost as bad as) being the University of Kentucky's basketball coach--there's simply no end of people who think they're more qualified than you to do your job and with a bucket of opinions on how badly you're fucking it up.

I'm sure many of those of you who aren't from Kentucky are aware of some other coaching job that carries a similar burden, though I suspect most of them are football coaching jobs.

For those who can't, here's some orientation.

When I moved to North Carolina, I was amazed to discover that a) North Carolinians think they like them some basketball and, yet, b) partisans of, e.g., both Duke and UNC would characterize a game with a dozen lead switches and a three point final score difference as "a great game."

You know what a "great game" is for a Kentucky fan? A 30 point blow out. Unless you send in the second string for the last five minutes, in which case it is permissible to allow the difference to drop to 21 points. Anything less, and the next day, every newspaper editor, every sports reporter, and every man, woman, child, dog, and cow in the Commonwealth has an opinion about what went wrong (i.e. why we only one by 8) that will be shared for the next 24 hours. Every town has a call-in show to discuss the game. Newspapers, especially the Lexington paper, are filled with opinions on the game. Everyone, you see, is a better coach than the guy who's there now.

All last summer, the bloggers, and his big donors, engaged in endless handwringing and offering of endless unsolicited advice about what Obama needed to do to break his campaign out of the doldrums and start overtaking Hillary's seemingly insurmountable lead before it was too late. Fortunately, he and Axelrod ignored them and stuck to their plan.

I completely agree, and that's why I'm not worried about the fact that McCain is currently outspending Obama on ads in a flood-ravaged state like Missouri.

However, I'd say that it's fair to say that when Clinton went "kitchensink", she was able to get traction. There were a number of reasons for that at the time, and while it wouldn't be accurate to say that Obama was caught off guard and didn't respond, what's true is that Clinton's attacks had a much larger media footprint than Obama's response. Part of that is simply the irresponsible nature of our media today. Part of this was due to the nature of the campaign Obama is attempting to run, which encourages certain media types to see what it takes to get him off his game. Part of it was the "Obamabi" narrative that some tried to foster in his battle with Clinton.

Whatever it is, that nut needs to be cracked now. McCain isn't going to run a shitty, inept campaign 2 months from now. The assholes at the RNC will ensure that won't happen. One thing they know how to do is win whatever the cost.

I'm not doubting Obama's ability to run a campaign. Trust me on that. He's orders of magnitude smarter and more capable than McCain. But I'm beginning to doubt Obama's ability to puncture a building narrative, which for all her faults, is something that Clinton excelled at.

I'm not saying that it's time to panicky that throw out what's worked for them, but the Obama camp has to recognize what has happened since about Wednesday of last week, and why. And they need to figure out a way to cut through the BS and not allow the media to put them on mute while the smear merchants come out to play.

That's the one thing that I hope they take away from this. The media is a problem, and now we have an idea of potentially how extensive a problem they can become. We have to deal with it.

user-pic

Gee, what a shock. The mcbush camp would love to talk about this issue 24/7 until november. They have nothing else to talk about, so they would love to argue about serving 5 years in a pow camp and getting shot down serving his country should not be "smeared" by obama. What a no-brainer. Obama obviously has to run from these types of attacks big time. It's a lose, lose proposition.

As shown by the media talking about Clarks comments non stop compared to talking about Obama's speech.

And not just the MSM - the blogs. How many posts do we have now on this?

Is anything else happening of import in the campaigns that we ought to be thinking about and discussing?

When are you going to post his patriotism speech, Greg?

He's not finished beating Obama over the head.

Yet another hypocritical statement published on McCain's website... Sending out a surrogate to attack Obama for sending out a surrogate???

For Immediate Release June 30, 2008 Contact: Press Office 703-650-5550

Statement by Admiral Leighton "Snuffy" Smith on Gen. Wesley Clark's Attack on John McCain

ARLINGTON, VA -- Admiral Leighton "Snuffy" Smith, USN (Ret.) today issued the following statement on Gen. Wesley Clark's attack on John McCain's military service record today on CBS' "Face the Nation":

"If Barack Obama wants to question John McCain's service to his country, he should have the guts to do it himself and not hide behind his campaign surrogates. If he expects the American people to believe his pledges about a new kind of politics, Barack Obama has a responsibility to condemn these attacks."

user-pic

that's hilarious! the only problem is that mccain himself hit obama for them too. otherwise it would be a slam dunk...

I made that joke on the Monday morning round-up!

hmph...

I read a response to this response at kos and it's pretty accurate:

So McCain can use a surrogate to say Obama's use of a surrogate is cowardly?

Huh?

user-pic

Wow, I didn't know that "Being a Centrist" meant "Being a Wimp". First FISA, now this. Being impressive and courageous is a great way to win the democratic primary, but we all know Americans just love to vote for people they perceive as wimps in the general election!

And acting like Mike Gravel is a good way to win neither...

Wesley Clark should get back on the air & insist on his framing . . . Neither he nor Obama should cower to the MSM and McCain camp's terrible twisting of the comments. This is a decisive moment. The right to untangle qualifications for the highest office in the land from military service is legitimate, fair, and reasonable -- and in no way demeans or disrespects that service. Making this an attack on McCain's patriotism is a horrible perversion of patriotism. Clark should speak again and Obama's camp should not stop him.

user-pic

he could do that. And clark's certainly right on the merits. However, the democratic nominee just kneecapped him.

so i'm not sure what good it would do.

He can go out and rephrase and expand on his argument.

That'll allow Obama to "unkneecap" him, and allow them to reset this debate if they choose to pursue it.

Obama didn't kneecap Clark. He said questioning the service of others was out of bounds. He didn't name anybody. Clark explicitly did not question McCain's service.

Clark will be on MSNBC with Andrea Mitchell tomorrow in the 1:00 pm est hour

F*&% John McCain and the MSM. But frankly, I'm not all that happy with Obama right now either. I'll still vote for him--should go without saying--but my "enthusiasm" factor is dimming by the day.

He needs to stop letting McCain push him around. And his quick, inartful rejection of Wes Clark just egged McCain on (remember HRC and the Samantha Powers incident?)

Count me as a very disgruntled Obama supporter right now. I do NOT want Campaign 2004 reruns all summer long.

The first step to avoiding 2004 is to have surrogates who can make a competent political attack. Wes Clark handed this to McCain on a silver platter.

It WILL be a repeat of 2004 if his supporters keep losing their enthusiasm for him after every speed bump.

Clark gave Obama no choice in this. Move on.

Bullshit, Clark was right. Obama handled it weakly.

Exactly, same here!!

Obama didn't reject Clark. He said questioning the service of others was out of bounds. He didn't name anybody. Clark explicitly did not question McCain's service.

NO one questioned anyone's service. So WTF then?! Clark questioned one's ability to lead a nation based on his prior lack of command experience but not his service to his country. There is a distinction and Obama is obviously dissing Clark, and that pisses me off. Kerry was just fine to cut up, but OMG, stay away from old McCain. This is MSM B.S.

you and josh must really not understand. did you see ANY OF THIS OUTRAGE when mccain said that bringing the troops home was NOT TOO IMPORTANT?

NO. obama knows that he can't win this battle even playing good cop/bad cop.

well politico has some good news, Obama snubed the DLC. http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Not_a_DLCer.html

user-pic

Now that brought a smile to my face after all the bad news. Thanks.

McCain's green screen background was more fun. Is he now being sponsored by 'Air Designs'?

Obama made the right move and framed the issue on his terms. Notice how Obama took the high ground and was on every channel while doing it, while McCain was replying to yesterday's news, and against Obama who had already distanced himself, and not on one channel.

Win/win for Obama, and another win for keeping on message and not being drawn off with meaningless dribble.

Some people need to move on from what they think Obama should be doing and get with what he IS doing; and he's doing it well.

What Wes Clarke said gives JM a little issue that he can use to beat BO with for a few days. I am not surprised that the McCain camp is not moving on because anything military is a win for McCain, but i dont think it will get the traction the McCain camp would like. After tomorrow the story will be gone.

Wes Clark just kissed his .005% chance of being VP goodbye.

user-pic

It was that high? I really think that this was a dumb comment by clark. By the way, notwithstanding all the criticism of Webb, I can't imagine him making such a gaffe. He was pretty gaffe-less in his senate run. Gotta make a plug for my man Webb.

Clark was exactly on point, I don't think he made any mistake. He was not dissing McCain's service, he simply pointed out the truth. McCain has never done anything to qualify him to command a nation, at least not any more than Obama.

I am really sick of all the touchy feely about McCain. Frankly, yes, he suffered. I cannot even begin to imagine. However, that was then, this is now, and McCain is a D.C. fixture that has no clue about world politics. Screw the MSM, it doesn't matter what anyone says, they will strike if it is in reference to Obama's benefit. And Obama better find his bullocks and start backing his own people. I am SICK of him apologizing in any way.

He was not dissing McCain's service, he simply pointed out the truth. McCain has never done anything to qualify him to command a nation, at least not any more than Obama.

Sure. And I think "what does McCain's military experience specifically have to do with being president?" is an important and worthwhile question to ask. The problem with Clark's comments to me was where he characterized McCain's military service as "riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down". That seems to be crossing a line, getting into 2004 Republican territory there, implying there's something actually dishonorable about McCain's service. Clark could have, as the Obama campaign has been doing for some time, point out McCain's military experience doesn't really tell us he's the best person to lead the country without belittling the experience itself.

I do think given Wes Clark's own stellar military service he probably personally has room to make such comments, but the Obama campaign needs to make it clear the sentiments were not their own and not an argument they're happy to see being made on their behalf...

I find it kinda funny TPM, OpenLeft etc are discussing whether Obama should have denounced Clark's comments solely based on the question of whether Obama doing what he just did helps Obama in the election campaign. The idea of whether, you know, demeaning the personal combat experience of a rival politician is the right thing to do seems to be something that nobody ever even thought to ask.

user-pic

Shorter McCain: "You guys in the press are my goon squad, I'm just gonna stay above the fray and act like I'm mildly disappointed while my surrogates and you my friends make me out to be the most patriotic American who ever lived and Obama who I'm not sure is even an American has just made the most scurrilous attack ever made in a presidential campaign. Now thanks but I really need a nap."

Mcc, as disgusted as I am with Obama right now, that's not what Clark said. He did NOT demean JM's military service--praised it, in fact, but said it alone does not qualify him to be president. And he's right. Given the reality of our in-the-tank-for-St.-John MSM, though, he did not put it very well.

Anybody notice that with the dark background, McCain looks like a talking head.

user-pic

Oh holy hell!
Hello to any brain cells still charging...
Why is what Clark said such a BFD? It's true.
Schieffer said shot down while "riding" in a plane.
And it appeared that Schieffer led HIMSELF into the shitcan with his response to this is not qualification to lead the free world... "REALLY????"
Why aren't we laughing at Schieffer's asininity???
Why is Obama distancing himself from Clark's remark and once again wussing away from reality. All the weinies on the thread trying to slap Clark around for making a correct statement because it's "perceived" poorly are damned annoying. Isn't this all supposed to be an effort to show that the Emperor is actually naked and from now on, we go for reality?
Man, every day Obama reveals himself as the politics as usual kind of guy I was hoping he wasn't.

Right on the mark.

Did you see Josh's blog on the front page, he too is perplexed by Obama's remarks. Obama is just totally off message the last two weeks. Whoever is advising Obama right now, stop making him a weeny saying he is sorry or indicating he's sorry. Geez, even I am seeing him as weak. He was very strong with the Wright speech, and now this.

I think the problem is that Obama's been trying to be a bit more of a "centrist" as the general election starts. The problem is that Obama's not a centrist and everybody knows it, so the posturing rings false. The left gets pissed off, the right and center aren't fooled, and everybody views Obama's actions as those of a typical pandering politician-- the exact thing Obama is trying to campaign as being different from.

I totally agree.

To mcc, how is Obama not a centrist??
His entire platform has been about bringing in bipartisanship to the table in order to get things done. You can't do that unless you govern from the center.

user-pic

Here is the problem. To the vast majority of americans mcbush is a war hero. That is an irrefutable fact. Does that make him qualified to be president? No, of course not. However, you don't want to get into a back and forth arguing about his service. It only emphasizes it and makes obama look bad. The obama campaign is absolutely correct in its strategy. Stipulate that he is a war hero and go after him for what he has done after that. It is counter productive to argue about his service and allow mcbush to bring it up over and over and over again.

Michael: I agree with this, I am just annoyed Obama bascially implied he was dissing Clark and distancing himself from the truth of Clark's statement. He only sets himself up for more attacks and looks weak.

user-pic

It's the stupid media that obama is trying to play. What clark said was obviously true, but it is being twisted by the supid right-wing media as an attack on his service. I really don't think obama had much of a choice. He wants to shut down the controversy as quickly as possible and not let it drag on. I guarantee every surrogate from here on out will use the term "war hero" without any details. Another stupid question from a right-wing hack reporter will be responded with by "war hero," commend service, etc., etc. then launch into an attack on everything after nam.

user-pic

You are correct Amelie.
Those who are sending up bluster balloons about how to satisfy John Q Public are also so fixated on the Beltway angle (applies always) are REALLY forgetting who is out there to listen. There would be the curious like us, there are the "I know it all and you are the great unwashed" like the high handed we see on the boards, and there is the average voter who won't make up his mind until a week or a day before the election and it doesn't matter what anybody says NOW to the latter.
And CENTRIST? What the hell is CENTRIST? Isn't there right or wrong? Or are we truly striving for sort of a bit right, sort of a bit wrong?
And yes I know it ain't a perfect world and all, but don't we even make a slap at doing this honestly and correctly??

Nailed it.

user-pic

Ugh, I just started to watch the beginning of his comments and I had to shut it down. It totally allowed him to play the sympathy card and play up his service. What a stupid f'n comment on clark's part. It really is indefensible. I would guess that we won't see clark out there again for quite some time. Dammit. That comment was a disaster for the obama campaign. I don't care about context or if it's right or anything else. Ugh!!!!

Clarke has his own backing.

There are too many Republican, Independent and Democratic veterans and veterans organizations waiting in the wings ready to pounce on McCain.

Especially after the GI bill rescission?

O yeah...Clarke just HAPPENED to show up in the news.

If McCain has to have a set up press conference with his own press corp and he can't deliver answers with anymore conviction and directness than this.

He knows Clarke coming out isn't good. Clarke knows him very well.

I guess Wes for VP is less likely now . . .

The questions to McCain from the press were as weak as the questions at McCain's "staged" townhall meeting. I was embarrassed for the ass-licking journalists. But still McCain looks slow and so tired that he needs the podium to hold him up; definitely not strong enough for the rigors of the presidency. Plus that background matching his suit to the shoulder gave him a comical look. McCain was again not impressive at all. Obama looked sharp in Missouri and hopefully his speech will get more play in Missouri than the MSM is willing to give it. It was a good speech.

My preferred explanation for this episode is good cop - bad cop pressure on McCain.

Though technically Clark did not dismiss McCain's service and did give him proper due for his sacrifice, he did manage to slip in the obvious but overlooked point that McCain got himself shot down. Oops. What do we really want from our heros-- that they get shot down or that they fly home victorious? I think it's kind of in the weeds, and frankly I put the chance this was engineered by Clark let alone Obama at very low odds. Yet, if there's a low information bottom line that will be reinforced by the constant mention in the press, I think it is that getting shot down doesn't make you a president.

Hmmm, that young vigorous general may have a point. Why is being a victim of the Vietnam war a good thing in a candidate? On the other hand it's cool Obama doesn't attack the victim for getting himself shot down Good for him.

But, I think there's a lot less to Clark's comment and Obama likes keeping the election focused on bigger issues so my good cop / bad cop hope is just that. No more.

Dear Greg,

I don't know ya and I'm sure you know WAY MORE about politics and campaign winning politcal strategies than I ever will. However, I don't care if John McCain was the biggest f**k-up to ever sit his butt behind the controls of a fighter plane and I don't care if he was drunk and/hungover the day he got shot down and 'confessed' all to the enemy. He did suit-up for combat and took enemy fire. Barack Obama has never worn so much as a boyscout uniform,to my knowledge, and, therefore, he has NO standing, not evern through surrogates to question ANY aspect of John McCain's military service and he OBVIOUSLY knows this.

Now, since Wes Clark's words are going to be blamed on Obama, rightly or wrongly, the ONLY thing for Obama to do is distance himself from them and nip the whole sh*tstorm as quickly as he possibly can. Because, even with my very limited knowledge of politics, I do know this: The last argument someone WHO HAS NEVER WORN THE UNIFORM OF THIS COUNTY (not even the Texas Air National Guard 'champagne unit'), wants to have is over the details, quality, relevance, or anything else related to the military service of someone who IS STILL crippled, maimed,and mutilated from being tortured for FIVE years as a soldier. That is not a debate the guy who NEVER served wins! EVER!

user-pic

Hello. I think that sums it up pretty clearly. Stipulate he is a war hero and move on from there.

I BETCHA McCain doesn't use his POW experience anymore.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7459946.stm

Monday, 23 June 2008 17:59 UK

When John McCain Was My Captive

By Andrew Harding
BBC News in Haiphong, Vietnam


"I don't know how he'd react if he met me again," said Mr Duyet, flicking through old black and white photographs of himself and his American prisoners at Hoa Lo.

"But I can confirm to you that we never tortured him. We never tortured any prisoners."

Mr Duyet reminisces instead about how he often summoned the future US presidential candidate to his private office for informal chats.

"We used to argue about the war - about whether it was right or wrong," he says.

"He is a very frank man - very conservative, and very loyal to his country and the American ideal.
Rapprochement

So is Mr Duyet implying that that Senator McCain lied about his treatment at the Hanoi Hilton?

"He did not tell the truth," he says.

"But I can somehow sympathise with him. He lies to American voters in order to get their support for his presidential election."
"He had a very interesting accent and sometimes he taught me words in English and corrected my accent. I have followed his career since he left prison."


user-pic

I actually thought it was a joke and then I read the link. Do you actually believe what a guard at the hanoi hilton says? I sure don't. I saw the pictures of the prisoners coming back and they sure didn't look like they were at a freaking picnic that's for sure. It's a loser of an argument for obama. Mcbush = war hero period. Everything else is totally fair game from how he mistreated to his first wife, lied as a politician, keating five, etc., etc., etc. However, he still is a war hero.

Right.

McCain's dad was an Admiral in the Navy.

Read about the fire on the air carrier he was assigned to.

The BBC is very careful about what they print.

BTW, Tran Trong Duyet is not a "guard" of the prison. He was in charge of the prison.

user-pic

Oops, but that is even more of a reason to doubt his credibility. Can you say war crimes?

Again:

"I don't know how he'd react if he met me again," said Mr Duyet, flicking through old black and white photographs of himself and his American prisoners at Hoa Lo.
user-pic

Like I am sure he would have broke out 8x10 glossies of them torturing and mistreating the american pow's. I don't think so.

It would be easy to disprove Duyet.

Just get other prisoners of the Hanoi to speak in McCain's behalf. The reasons that they won't is because of what those veterans find dismissive about McCain.

user-pic

I actually thought that mcbush had a couple of pows that he was in the camp with affiliated with the campaign or ready to talk about it or something like that. Also, on your point below, I will bet you a lunch that mcbush will bring his pow stuff up every chance he gets regardless of what this guy said. What else does he have to talk about? Nothing. By the way, I still don't believe him and I am anti-mcbush. This guy is meaningless to the vast majority of american voters.

user-pic

I agree about the bbc and I have absolutely no doubt that is what the guy said. The issue is do you believe what the guy said. I sure don't and I am not a mcbush fan obviously. Also, my guess is that 80% or more of the american voting public wouldn't believe what the guy said either. If obama attacks his stay at the hanoi hilton as being a cake walk, he will make nixon's landslide over mcgovern look like a squeaker.

I just stated the facts as presented.

Didn't say it was an Obama campaign strategy. But neither will the POW experience be for McCain anymore.

Christ, you would think that someone that got shot down, got "tortured", etc. wouldn't have their feelings hurt so easily.

Christ, you would think that someone that got shot down, got "tortured", etc. wouldn't have their feelings hurt so easily.

user-pic

McCain keeps this up in response to Obama being nice to him, the Obama campaign and those members of the media who aren't completely bought off with BBQ parties should start pointing out what an ungracious sore loser he is.

Well, Greg's found this week's FISA.

Oh and look, Rush Limbaugh is beating the same drum today.

Does Rush get The Daily Blumenthal, too, Josh?

user-pic

i find it a little ironic that McCain's vaunted war experience has led him to embrace, wholeheartedly, the failed policies of a man who, at best, served his country during Viet Nam from a vollyball pit in the Deep South.

CALL and TELL Em what you think

I just did...Option 6 gets you a real person

To reach the Campaign Headquarters by phone, please call: (866) 675-2008
user-pic

If Democrats are spooked by the comments of Wesley Clark, then we might as well just hand McCain the election now as we're looking at Kerry redux. People need to grow spines, stand up to the bullshit Republican rhetoric and call 'em out.

I swear to god some Democrats haven't learned anything in the past 20 years. If it's not navel-gazing, it'll be hand-wringing or purity-clucking; we'll find a way to fuck up this election. Obama better show some mettle soon or we're toast.

Obama is doing the right thing by staying above the fray.

We is the fray.

We have found the fray and it is us.

~ Pogo Redux.

TPM seems more spooked by Obama's response than Obama was by Clark's comments in the first place.

Looks like he does "do cower" after all.

Thanks, Josh for your perspective on the fireworks. If Clark was/is willing to go out on the limb on this, he has to be willing to resist the barrage because the basic point he's made is quite valid and apt and needs to be repeated again and again, over and over, as the ad-makers know so well.

Atop that is the issue of McCain's senescence, his exhibiting signs of loss of mental acuity in recent years.

The fighter jock of yore is long, long gone and is quick becoming a doddering fool. For Clark to back down on this would be a distinct setback, despite Obama's position on Clark's view.

user-pic

Do we really know Obama's position on this really? All he said today was that he was up for criticizing other people's patriotism; Clark wasn't criticizing McCain's patriotism, he was criticizing McCain's claim to expertise. Or did I miss something?

user-pic

Never mind my last question. I found Obama's spokesperson's comments:

"As he's said many times before, Senator Obama honors and respects Senator McCain's service, and of course he rejects yesterday's statement by General Clark," said Obama campaign spokeman Bill Burton.

Ugh. Say hello to President McCain. Obama should have just kept his mouth shut on this one.

I've always believed that McCain's suffering and service was praiseworthy. No question.

But will some of the nervous nellies quit hyperventilating about this?

A former senior Army General and former presidential candidate just made a useful distinction: McCain's heroics (and they are that; he was an exemplary Naval officer) are not necessarily the same thing as being able to make presidential decisions.

He's already made a bunch of boneheaded decisions, in fact, not to mention a whole lot of questionable moral moves in order to win the GOP nomination.

Since when is it illegal, imoral or fattening to talk about a candidate's qualifications for the office he seeks?

God knows McCain's (and Hillary's, before that)surrogates have been doing that to Obama every single chance they can, and a lot of it is a whole lot less savory that what Clark said.

For my money, McCain's a crybaby. He squeals over every little thing. I'll bet he never whimpered like this when his torturers worked him over in Hanoi.

Jesus, John. Get a grip. Getting shot down is not a gold pass to the Oval Office. It's a major part of who you are, but quit riding this pony where it doesn't belong.

Not very presidential.

Why do Obama, and Clarke, hate America?

user-pic

They don't hate America. They just hate it that morons like you get to live here. :)

user-pic

This really hits McCain right in the gut. I thought McCain handled it well, though. It's members of the press--not McCain--who are trying to turn this into a bigger deal than it is. Remind you of anyone, Greg?

Wait, I am missing something. How does the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO, get busted for criticizing the command credentials of an airman?

How the F did that get twisted around. If anyone in this entire sordid mess has the right and experience to tell you what a serviceman can and cannot do, it's Clark. Isn't he also a Rhodes Scholar?

If I were Clark, I would remind Senator Obama who he is obliquely referring to, and reiterate my statement.

This is just nuts. McCain should fucking salute every time he mentions Gen Clark's name.

Yeah, I know he's an Ex-Supreme Commander, but come on.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address