« Networking Group Opposing FISA Cave On Obama's Web Site Grows And Grows | Home | McCain Surrogate Condemning Attacks On His Military Record Was In Swift Boat Vet Ads Against Kerry »

Lieberman Suggests There Will Be Terrorist Attack In 2009

Uh oh. Looks like Joe Lieberman is experimenting with new and creative ways of amplifying the GOP message that if we elect Barack Obama president, we'll all die.

On CBS yesterday, Lieberman strongly suggested that we would be hit by a terror attack in 2009 -- and that this should make us pull the lever for McCain...

As a special bonus for all you Lieberman fans, also note that Lieberman cited Hillary's attack on Obama's commander in chief cred during the primaries.

Now, there' s nothing wrong with debating the question of who would make a better president in the event of a terrorist attack. The problem is that when Lieberman does this sort of stuff, it allows the big news orgs to report it the way CNN has here...

"Democrat predicts new terror attack," CNN claims, thereby helping Lieberman get away with the ruse of giving phony bipartisan legitimacy to a thoroughly partisan GOP attack.


Comments (57)

That's my Mentum!

Run Joe Run

he's totally Rumsfeld now!

avatar

Grrr, he isn't a goddamn Democrat!! F'ing media..

Exactly. He is not a member of the Democratic Party. Not only de facto but de jure.

Dear CNN:

You suck.

As everyone knows, Holy Joe, backed by the blessings of the Republican machine, bested Mr. Lamont.

However, he is still a registered DEM in his now hometown of Stamford CT. He did reside in New Haven, and several DEM's went to the Registrar of Voters to try and get his party affiliation voided. No such luck. (see below, and seach for more) IMO, his support of the R's should be grounds for his expulsion.

I don't believe that same kind of action followed him to Stamford, but it does give Joe at least the technically correct thread to claim his Democratic status.

http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/08/city_wont_undem.php

Holy Joe isn't a Democrat.

And just how would Holy Joe know this? Is he in on the planning?

thereby helping Lieberman get away with the ruse of giving phony bipartisan legitimacy to a thoroughly partisan GOP attack.

This is exactly the problem with Joe Lieberman. Shoddy journalism creates the image that some Democrat thinks McCain is much better than Obama.

Joe Liebermann is fully approved and unadultrated scum bag. Thanks Greg, for posting the CNN page shot. Fox, though unexcited, are forced to fall in line and carry the water for McCain. But CNN, and ABC are leading the list of MSM hacks who are pumped and excited to put McCain in the White House. Notice a twinkle in the eyes of Blitzer or Gibson when they talk McCain.

CNN, ABC working hard to keep their profits, working hard for four more years of McBush.

Lieberman is an opportunistic chameleon who would easily mug your grandmother if there was any gain for him, however insignificant.But the media disappoints me with their anything-goes attitude.The more controversial and stupid, the better the currency to shift it to the front pages. Sad pathetic!

Though redundant, I have to add, Joe Liebermann is a traitor to his party, traitor to his constituents and because of unreasonable and blind sighted preference for Israel, he's a traitor to his own country.

Also, we all knew the eventual ripple effects when Hillary was throwing Kitchen sink, I guess we're jus

to complete my thought, I guess we're just supposed to shut up and deal with the effects of Hillary's primary strategies.

I agree with you that Lieberman is a traitor on every level, as well as an unprincipled scumbag who seems to be trying to outdo Karl Rove in bottom-feeding fearmongering.

However, I do want to take issue with this notion of Lieberman being more loyal to Israel than the U.S. (an argument more than a few posters have made). Lieberman's "loyalties," such as they are, are with the Likud Party, not the State of Israel. To conflate the two is no different than what the Republicans have tried to do here -- to conflate loyalty to party with loyalty to country. In both cases -- Likud in Israel, GOP in USA -- I believe that their agendas are harming the interests, well-being and, yes, the security, of their respective countries.

avatar

Shouldn't that headline read "Connecticut for Liebermanite predicts new terrorist attack"?

Joe has gone to the dark side.
He just finished the chapter on FEAR out
of Roves handbook

CNN has now changed the headline to read, "McCain Backer Predicts Terror Attack." I guess they're striving for a modicum of accuracy after all.

I don't understand why they don't just write "Lieberman." Are people going to confuse him with Ralph Lieberman the Auto Parts King? Even if he is a douche, he's a Senator and a pretty well-known one, at that.

Well known for being a douche. That's Joe Lieberman, all right.

Of course, I prefer Kos's estimation of the senator from CT - "that asshole Joe Lieberman." He even got the DLC to applaud that one.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/30/01735/0857/156/543957

That's why I thanked Greg for posting the CNN screen shot. I assume, quite a few along with TPM on the tubes noticed and flagged CNN.

why is CNN still refering to lieberman as a democrat? and its not the first time they've done it either.

Joe Lieberman is an INDEPENDENT.

CNN covered the primary race in 06! They should KNOW the Lieberman is not a democrat and yet they make a conscious decision to identify him as such.

I think I need to write CNN a letter blasting them for their lazy, if not outright dishonest, "journalism".

On another aspect, I'm not among those who think Obama ran a near-perfect campaign in the primary. They didn't always took control or close the deal with the Hillary and when in lead opted to remain reactive.

And I notice and frankly I'm dissappointed at Obama camps early game plan in the GE campaign. They haven't been proactive at all. McBush is the one in control of the narrative, Energy policy, Security, etc.

While McCain thankfully finds ways to fall flat on his face, Obama campaign better take control of the narrative.

I can't stand cnn. What a bunch of losers. They should change their name to nin, the national inquirer network. They don't practice journalism, they just repeat talking points and look at the stupid hot topics, amy freaking winehouse??????? I'm surpised that don't have a link to nude pictures of her at the top as well. Unbelievable.

avatar

You may want to add HuffPo to that list. They can't seem to get enough of Amy Winehouse stories either.

If terrorists didn't exist, Lieberman and McCain would have to invent them.

Why do you think they want to stay in Iraq and invade Iran?

Quite possibly the best post on TPM ever. Obama should use it.

avatar

Joe Lieberman's voice:
Colitis personified

avatar

Joe seems to know a little too much about how terrorists think and what they're planning.

I'm not saying he's aligned with terrorists or has some sort of connection to al Qaeda, I'm just saying his knowledge of what terrorists want to do, when they want to do it, and who they want and don't want to see elected is just so deep it's as if he's on the terrorist conference calls or something.

Again, I'm not saying Joe's in league with terrorists; maybe his mind just works that way.

You know, you are right. Maybe the king's administration should tap his phones and the fbi should investigate him. He just might be in league with the 9 foot tall islamo-fascist terrorists that want to invade our country from mexico and take away our way of life.

avatar

Why is Joe Lieberman on a talk show?

Seriously, why? I know he's a senator. There are 100 senators.

I mean, we all know the answer. But I'd be intersted to hear what the networks' response would be.

Do we trust these mofos? I don't and they sure are making a lot of noise about an attack.


avatar

Lieberman should run for president of Israel

He missed his calling- he should have been an Orthodox rabbi.

Having just come back from a bar mitzvah, I'd say that you owe rabbis everywhere (Conservative, Orthodox, Reformed) an apology!

Question:

Was this the same Face the Nation where Clark questioned McCain's qualifications for President?

So, it's OK for McCain surrogates to declare Obama is not qualified to be CIC, but god forbid a Obama surrogate does the same?!?

Now you get it.

It's a rule: IOKIYAR

pretty much. don't you know that you can't question John McCain's credentials or qualifications to be president? I mean, it may be perfectly true that the act of getting shot down doesn't qualify you to be president, but you can't say it because to say it implies that you're hate america and veterans and such.

Unless, of course, you're talking about John Kerry. Then they can just make shit up about you-it doesn't even matter if its true or not. Say he shot himself to get out of combat. Call him a coward and a liar.

But for gods sakes! Dont you dare raise the (true) point that just getting shot down doesn't qualify you to be president.

I was a little surprised by Bob Schieffer's reaction when Clark said McCain's military record doesn't qualify him to be president.

Schieffer: "It doesn't..?!?"

The statement seems pretty self-evident to me.

Schieffer is likable enough and occasionally does a good special commentary. Unfortunately, he is no longer quick enough to pick up pertinent details or hold someone such as Lieberman's pointy little hooves to the fire.

Schieffer is a boot-licking numbskull who threw the single most disgusting soft ball question to Bush in the last debate in '04 that anyone could have thought up. Because they are old friends.

IT was one of those moments - when Bush answered - when I knew there is no god, cause if there was, Bush would have been struck by lightning. The question was about the environment and Bush answered it in code to the Dominionists - he said: I believe I have been a good steward to the environment.

One of the biggest lies he ever told, and god knows he lies every time he opens his mouth.

I stand corrected.

Check out Lee Iacocca's words of wisdom on the subject at today's (Monday) http://www.juancole.com Informed Comment. The topic line is "Where the Hell is our Outrage?"

Lee is a little late with the outrage - Bush's term is almost over. Where was he in '04? I'll bet he was voting for Bush.

He knows about a future terrorist attack!!! Render him to Bulgaria for waterboarding and fingernail pulling!

avatar

Can you imagine Joe under "extreme interrogation"? The guy can't stop talking as it is.

avatar

heh. holy joe getting ahead of his puppetmasters...

avatar

Crazy Joe has been shilling for the GOP since at least 2000, but what else is new? We would like to know, however: where can one buy tickets to witness the heave-ho if/when the Dems pick-up enough Senate seats in November to toss this cookie?

I'm predicting in 2009, there won't be a Democratic Senator named Joe Lieberman

Often, when we think of politicians, we see them as self-serving based what they say, support and vote for. But Lieberman is the more than the illustratiion of the self serving politician, he's the cartoon version.

I think Joe figures he has nothing to lose now. He realizes that his playing both ends against the middle for his own prestige is coming to an end. When Obama becomes president, Lieberman's seniority and chairmanships will be taken away from him. And not a minute too soon.

Let's not forget that if there were another attack and it could plausibly be attributed to Al Qaeda, the blame for it would need to be laid squarely at the doorstep of the White House, given the fact that this delusional jackass marionette has spent the past seven years ignoring the obvious mission at hand in favor of the moronic neocon hallucination of pursuing "democracy" in Iraq...and that the broadened Islamist terrorist capabilities both within Iraq (where they didn't previously exist) and in Afghanistan/Pakistan (where their eradication has been neglected) are entirely the fault of the fools/war criminals comprising this unelected, incapable pseudo-administration. The only thing more appalling than this demonstration of dishonesty and incompetence is the fact that public opinion is still so credulous that Republicans can have the gall (and lack of embarassment over their own incompetence) to put forward, shamelessly, the idea that only they can provide security against "terrorist" attacks...and many Americans buy it.

avatar

I cannot stand this mealey mouth bigot.

Wouldn't, by Joe's own logic, that mean that the attack would happen even if McCain were president. I just can't wait till he is irrelevant to the press too.

SOS Iceberg, I cannot praise your post enough. You have encapsulated so many important points and have done so in a brilliant manner.
Well said!

p.s. Lieberman is a wanker, a douchebag and a hypocritical twit!

Hey Paulie thanks. I often feel like I'm just fulminating here, among many with more info and more measured insights. My EQ plummets below three digits whenever I think of these Republicans and those who follow.

He meant to say that HE will have a heart attack if Obama wins.

avatar

Thank you for your insight, Pat Robertson.

avatar

I have the Democrats Joe Liberman solution....Chuck Hagel. Some how the message should be delivered to Mr Liberman to tone down his rhetoric or he will be kick out of the conference and Chuck Hagel will switch to Independent and caucus with the Democrats!!

Post a Comment

Poll Tracker

View more polls »
Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address