« Poll: Nearly Half Of African Americans Want Hillary On Ticket | Home | Jim Webb Auditions As Top Obama Surrogate »

Hillary's Congressional Supporters Back Off Plan To Push Hillary As Veep

Yesterday the news broke that Hillary's Congressional supporters, led by Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, were planning to write a joint letter asking Obama to make Hillary his Veep, a story first reported by The Politico.

Now, however, the plan's been called off. Schultz's office sends me this statement from her:

"Several Members of Congress considered a letter written to both Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton, underscoring the need for their partnership and the unity it would bring to the party. It was felt that the letter was being misconstrued as a demand on Senator Obama and we've decided to communicate our views informally."

This underscores, of course, the delicacy of the task at hand: Urging Obama to appoint her as Veep without pressuring him to do so and hence making it impossible for him to actually accept, lest he appear to have caved.


128 Comments

| Leave a comment

What about the Bob Johnson and Lanny Davis campaigns which are equally as stupid. Hell, they might as well have Geraldine Ferraro running the campaign to elect Hillary as Obama's VP.

Ha!

Barack/Chuckster '08

And...there it is.

As I said in comments below, for people that truly want her to get an invitation to be VP someday, they need to back the fuck off now. No way can Obama consider her as veep at this point, as he would look weak as hell were he to take her.

That established, please, Greg, can you move on from this kind of silliness and focus your considerable talents on educating us about McCain's various half-truths, whole untruths, and hypocrisy?

The VP stuff will unwind over the next 60 days as Carolyn Kennedy and her committee do their thing. NOW is the time to focus on defining McCain and working shape narrative...

Hillary Clinton WILL NOT be Obama's VP.

Period. End of Story.

Here are the numerous reasons, beside the narcissism, that make her ineligible for Obama’s VP:

1. If the first major decision Obama makes is seen as being forced upon him – as taking Hillary Clinton on as his VP pick would be – he’d immediately start from a weakened position.
2. Change: Senator Clinton DOES NOT represent change. She represents the status quo. She represents the exact opposite. We all know it. Republicans won’t forget that. Neither will Obama’s supporters.
3. 2 Senators on a ticket would be a disaster.
4. 2016: Hillary offers nothing for a 16 year run – these types of things must be considered if we are going to really turn back the clock on 40 years of destructive conservative rule.
5. New York State will be won no matter who Obama choose as VP.
6. Hillary’s numerous lies: Not just the recent ones like Sniper Fire, NAFTA, etc.
7. Hillary's ethics problems from the early 1970s while in Washington as a lawyer.
8. Hillary’s Rose Law Firm work: attacked the credibility of an alleged 12 year old rape victim
9. Hillary’s Union-busting WalMart work.
10. Hillary’s religious cult: Doug Coe.
11. Hugh Rodham
12. Norman Hsu: Over $800,000 in illegal donations. How many other Hsu’s are there?
13. Vince Foster (lie or not doesn’t matter).
14. NAFTA & The Clinton’s Chinese connections.
15. Bill: Saudi Arabia & his other foreign business dealings.
16. Bill: Impeachment
17. Bill: Library Fundraisers
18. Bill: Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broderick and ALL the current “affairs.”
19. Bill: “Speaking fees” from Foreign Governments that helped HRC loan money to her campaign.
20. Bill: Sandy Berger
21. Bill: 9/11 – True or not, he will be blamed.
22. Bill: Mena, Arkansas (state officials were involved in some way with alleged illegal cocaine importation, money laundering while Bill was Governor).
23. Bill: Webb Hubbell; Bill’s associate AG (Plead guilty on federal mail fraud & tax evasion charges).
24. Bill & Hillary: Whitewater.
25. Bill’s Pardons: Don Tyson (Chicken), Marc Rich
26. Bill: Illegal donations from Canadian tycoon Frank Giustra
27. And finally this must be said regarding Hillary's RFK remarks: God forbid something happened to you; she’d be LBJ to your JFK. NO WAY.

While unthinkable, Obama must seriously take this into consideration. LBJ didn’t end the war he knew JFK was about too. Neither would HRC regarding Iraq. She is a war hawk, just like Joe Lieberman. She is an entranced DLC sell-out who has no intention of standing up to the military industrial complex. Obama’s Vice Presidential pick must be someone who won’t immediately deviate from his policies if the unthinkable happens.

I truly believe Obama will to pick someone who emphasizes and magnifies the qualities he embodies and has been running on – not someone who conventional wisdom says must fill some “magical void” he has.

He will also pick someone who is also another from-the-beginning anti-Iraq war proponent; someone who like him, is an obvious change candidate; one who is progressive; from a state he or she can help us win and is not tied to the Clintons or the DLC in any way, shape or form.
Bill Clinton ignored conventional wisdom when picked another DLC southerner in Al Gore. It was one of the smartest things he actually did.

Hillary Clinton must not and I have every confidence in the end, will not be on Obama's ticket as VP.

And for anyone who thinks Hillary & Bill Clinton have already been vetted:

She (they) have NOT been vetted for the past 8 years. Not by a long shot.

She couldn't pass a VP selection vetting process.

Obama's camp knows it, and it's why they bring it up immediately when asked about her as VP.

She will have to submit to whatever Obama ask for the vetting process and she won't be able to.

Not on their finances, the foundation's funding, the library's funding, his speaking fees and Saudi ties & Chinese connections, where the loaned money to the campaign really came from, Bill's business dealings, etc.

None of it.

She can't and won't be able do it.

She will NEVER be VP.

If anyone thinks she got this far during this campaign because she has already vetted, you haven't been paying attention to the things I list above which Obama did NOT bring up as a way to take her down during the campaign.

Had he, this primary would have been over in February.

He chose not to do that to a fellow Dem.

She, on the other hand had no problems using whatever was at her disposal, no matter how vile, racist or of a personal nature, because she has absolutely NO ethics whatsoever.

He ran his campaign against her with one hand tied behind his back out of respect for her, the party and President Clinton.

She and Bill didn't deserve it.

user-pic

While I agree with you 100% on everything you say I must add one little (unpleasant) truth: Obama (a black man) would have a hard time really attacking Hillary (a white woman.)

I think Obama did not only the honorable thing by not bringing up the points you have so rightly listed, but he also did the politically smart thing.

Oh, absolutely! That was definitively part of his thinking, I'm sure. It had to be. He would have been the 'angry black man' had he gunned for her as directly as she did at him.

user-pic

This is why I've always thought that, in many ways, the real action in this election would take place during primary season.

I think History will regard Hillary as a much harder opponent for barack than McCain.

user-pic

Yes, I just hope McCain stays in until November. My next worry, now that Clinton seems to be out, will be that the GOP realizes what dire straits they're in and they decide to put a younger candidate in.

In reply to thejoshuablog.
So smart and so handsome!!
If any Clinton is any where near the presidential election process republicans will crawl out of thier graves to vote against her. They will have all the convicts re-registered and PAY them to vote for McCain.
The Clintons CANNOT pass the vetting process to stand anywhere near Obama.
I'll bet TenaX can't even see Hilary's yellow pantsuit in her rearview mirror by now.

[blushing]

Very good lighting, 7 years ago. ;-)

Unless I missed it you did not mention the Peter Paul fraud suit against the Clintons, pending on the CA court docket. Could be a tempest in a teapot, but still a distraction.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51664

She doesn't want to be VP. She doesn't want to be seen as refusing a spot on the unity ticket. I think the Presidential Library thing offers both sides a chance to do what they want.

Like Clinton, Obama doesn't want her on the ticket. He knows his campaign has been so effective at making Clinton seem evil, the Kool Aid drunks will go absolutely bezerk if she's the Veep nominee. He wants someone who's part of the cult.

Not trying to be a dick, but is there any chance that you could make this list into it's own blog entry and just post a link? It's a good stuff - and I completely agree. It's just long as hell and has already been posted a bunch of times!

It's starting to feel like that "You Might Be an Idiot" cut-paste job from WaPo (and every other site that doesn't require commenter registration).

When 'people' stop pushing the HRC as VP meme, I'll stop posting my response.

;-)

user-pic

It is not narcissism . . . HRC is afflicted with full-blown meglomania.

I agree.
And, if Obama and his advisers believe that he should consider a female running mate, to make sure that Hillary's older-women base turns out in November, he should give serious consideration to Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius. She, in her second term as governor, has a proven ability to win elections in a very conservative state (she spent 8 years in the state legislature, then became insurance commissioner, and then governor...twice) without compromising her progressive, pro choice beliefs. She has worked hard on health care (she took on and beat the HMO lobby as insurance commissioner) and education, two issues that are very important to voters this year. And she is a woman who worked her way through the ranks to a high position, instead of marrying it.

Putting Caroline Kennedy on the VP committee really sent a strong signal that she ain't getting it and as John Aravosis (AmericaBlog) points out:

Hmm, so with Caroline Kennedy leading Obama's VP search....

Does callously invoking her uncle's assassination:

a) Help a potential VP candidate; or
b) Hurt a potential VP candidate.

I'm going to hazard a guess that this wasn't lost on the Obama folks when they chose her. They're good. Real good. (Hat tip to reader Tom for mentioning this to me.)

http://www.americablog.com/2008/06/hmm-so-with-caroline-kennedy-leading.html

Ya think, John?

Too late.

Actually, Hillary ruled herself out a long time ago with the CIC threshold talk.

But, it will all work out: Obama will give Hillary something else she wants, and we'll be united against McCain.

HRC supprters are not without political will and savy. Let's watch them move and move quickly to the nominee. Hell, when I learned that the campaign callled certain congressional supporters to ask for help in getting her to endorse and quit her bs...that was good news! On to the GE with full support and hard work. We'll need each other as the GOP unleashes a ton of hate and garbage at Obama. Since McFlub isn't worth a damn as a campaigner, they will put all in their money into garbage 527's and ads that will cross every line of decency.

Good. It is incredibly disrespectful to try and dictate who Obama should pick in any shape or form.

It is unbecoming for her to stand up now, hand waving in the air, "Pick me! Pick me!"

She wants time? Give Obama time.

Ha! And the Tracy Flick comparisons remain entirely apt.

Greg -

Are you ever going to do an in depth story on the amazing fact that Barack Obama is the first African American nominee for President of the United States?

That the world is in awe right now? That the world finally feels America is living up to the potential that Bush almost destroyed permanently in their eyes.

Or, are you going to continue pushing HRC stories that have absolutely NO basis in reality?

HRC lost.

This is about Barack Obama now. 100%.

Not what's next for HRC.

(And if you're going to look at those numbers honestly, 1/2 of the AA vote doesn't say they want her on the tkt. Had she been the nominee, she'd only be getting about 55% of the AA vote according to all polls. She'd lose based upon that fact alone. Gore got 90%, Kerry got 88%.)

This was posted in the previous post of yours, but since a new post popped up in the meantime, I posted it in here as well.

Good one Joshuablog. Greg needs to put out a separate blog on the histroy-in-the-making that Obama has accomplished.In Britain the papers are awash with this story and the radio stations have picked it up.
The biggest selling paper in Britain The Sun ran a front page on him, along with a two page spread with the immortal headline

Can he win it? Yes.he.can
.
Class class class!

Absolutely. It's time to recognize this achievement for what it is, even if it didn't get the recognition it deserved on the night it occurred.

user-pic

This whole "Hillary angling for veep" thing has me most perplexed. For the life of me I don't understand why in the world Hillary would want the veep position. Why would she want to give up her fairly powerful position in the Senate -- that would only grow stronger after this election cycle -- to become a bit player that wields little to no power? Could she really be considering a 2016 run?...because that's the only scenario I could imagine would interest her.

** This, of course, is setting aside all of the obvious negatives of having her on the ticket in the first place **

user-pic

I really don't think Clinton is angling for VP. She has a bunch of crazed, die-hard supporters like Johnson and Wasserman-Schultz who have it in their heads to push her for VP. They are saying, "Is it OK to do this?" and she is not giving them an outright "No", so they are reading that as "OK, go ahead". If she says "No, it's not OK", that will be reported negatively as Clinton Refuses to Serve as Obama VP. So she's saying "Well, of course if asked to serve I would be open to it", because that's how you support the nominee.

I think we have a lot of smoke here with no real fire. The smoke is being emitted from a few Clinton supporters who are still very riled up and angry, and in the mood to demand something, anything, as an expression of their leverage and a token of respect from the Obama campaign.

Awww, why? Is blatant identity politics not working for you? Or is it the fact that Obama has almost as many female supporters as Hillary?

user-pic

Hillary has no chance of being VP. The Clintons are unwilling to submit to the vetting process (think the Clinton Library and the Clinton foundation.)

James A. Johnson, who vetted potential nominees for Sen. John Kerry in 2004, is playing a major role. He has advised Obama and the campaign about the architecture of the process, though it is not clear whether he will reprise his role as head of the search committee. Ex-Sen. Tom Daschle is also providing advice.

"As always, we don't have anything to say about it," said Dan Pfeiffer, Obama's deputy communications director.

Kerry began his three-month search process in March of 2004. Johnson and his team looked at scores potential candidates and vetted about a dozen of them, ultimately settling on Ex-Sen. John Edwards.

Johnson, a former CEO of Fannie Mae who is currently vice chairman of Perseus LLC, a merchant bank, also vetted vice presidential candidates for Walter Mondale, whose campaign he chaired. On the eve of the convention in 1984, Mr. Mondale was set to choose Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, only to find irreconcilable political problems with the business dealings of Ms. Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum. Mondale chose Geraldine Ferraro instead. Ironically, questions about Ferraro's husband, a real estate developer, would dog her throughout the general election campaign. Mr. Johnson said later that the experience if 1984 had taught him to start much earlier and vet much more thoroughly.

The vetting process entails a rigorous schedule of interviews focusing on everything from politics to potential embarrassments -- Did they ever employ a nanny on whose behalf they did not pay Social Security taxes, for example; did they experiment with drugs or people in college? -- and potential candidates are required to give the search team access to their tax returns and other financial records.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/quietly_obama_begins_the_quest_1.php


Alternate headline:

WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ FINALLY SHUTS HER OVERSIZED PIE-HOLE!

Few people actually make me shudder at their sight.

She's one!

I hope my nasty fax cursing her out didn't scare her off.

LOL!

I'm sure mine wasn't the only one.

Hey Greg -

Maybe you can ask her a followup question: How many emails, letters, phone calls & faxes did she get upset at her attempts to dictate to Obama who his VP should be.

I wonder why there hasn't been more coverage of this nugget from the WSJ (link via
HuffPo):

But close advisers to Sen. Obama signaled an Obama-Clinton ticket was highly unlikely. People in both camps cited what several called "a deal-breaker" -- Bill Clinton may balk at releasing records of his business dealings and big donors to his presidential library.

I just can't see the ultra-paranoid Clintons (particularly Bill) submitting their dirty laundry to Obama for inspection. And I can't see Obama (or the Democratic party) picking a vice president about whom the GOP know more than the candidate does.

The thought that Bill can't get through the VP vetting process but would have been fine as First Spouse is ridiculous.

user-pic

this is me being a cynic...

still, over on huffpo, thomas edsall says that, in effect, hillary clinton is now running for the vp slot.

and although no one seems to be saying this yet (at least no one i've read), it seems that it would be pretty obvious to hillary clinton that the cheneyfication of the vice presidency has made that position vastly more powerful, and less accountable, than it has ever been, historically.

so, again, this is me being cynical: does anyone else think, given the last 8 years, that hillary is looking at that vp slot as more than just a consolation prize? certainly dick cheney has demonstrated how one could wield more power with less impunity from that position than [arguably] even the president.

Just as he decides who will be his VP, Obama will decide the degree of power he yields to his VP. I'm not entirely sure he's planning to follow any precedent set by the Bush administration.

Change, remember?

Cheney expanded the role of vice pres to be sure.
Obama however, would have Clinton on a short leash, just like Kennedy did with LBJ. Anywhere LBJ went in the world JFK sent an "advisor" to keep an eye on him.

I still don't think she has a snowball's chance in hell though. It would be a disaster on so many levels and for so many reasons.

user-pic

Yay!

She's not going to be the Veep - that's just as plain as day.

And Obama is not going to be pushed around - that's also plain as day.

If anyone doubts that - talk to Droopy Lieberman. I am still cruising on that story about Barack backing Droopy into a corner and leaning on him. Do you know how long I've waited for someone to finally do that? And it was Barack who did it.

Boy, did I make the right choice of which candidate to support.

Tena: in full view of the Senate chamber replete with press!

A thing of beauty!!
A public dressing down that has been long overdue.

user-pic

It's a new day. It really is.

user-pic

Free at last!!! Free at Last!!! ♪♪♪

Thank God Almighty! Free at Last!!!

♪♪♪

user-pic

Wave bye bye in the rearview mirror, TheraP. :)

user-pic

I'll wave bye bye from every angle. I'd even go up in a balloon and do it from the sky!!!

♪♪♪

Boy, these strong-arm letters worked so well in the past, though...

The Hillary camp didnt anticipate such strong backlash, further proof that neither Hillary or any in her camp is adept at reading the mood of the people.

Vetting Process

1-Denial
2-Anger-
3-Bargaining-
4-Depression-
5-Acceptance-

We're almost through this, folks.

user-pic

Indeed.

Closure on Saturday. :)

In their exuberance, they nixed any hope that she could be the VP. A bunch of novices trying to contribute.

Sorry Debbie, too late.

Moreover, You'll be stuck in the House for at least 8 more years.

HRC as VP is DOA.

Can we require her to fetch Wexler's lunch?!?

LOL

I swear, everytime i see her on TV I yell to the screen: STFU!

New York Congressional delegation is going to endorse Obama today, too. Press conference at 1.

Allelujah!

Clinton 17,802,300
Obama 17,501,751

His campaign plane barely touched down in West Virginia and Kentucky, where he ceded both states to Clinton. Why the snub? On Tuesday night, Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, was touting the emergence of a changing Democratic Party chock-full of new voters. But why convey, even inadvertently, such dismissiveness toward the old?

This is the sort of slight Clinton may have had in mind when she riffed on Tuesday night about "what does Hillary want?" One of the items on her list: "I want the nearly 18 million Americans who voted for me to be respected, to be heard and no longer to be invisible."

Obama's own election-night speech was beautiful in its cadence, mesmerizing as political theater. Still, the blue-collar and middle-class voters Obama needs to lift him to the White House aren't much interested in joining a movement. They want their meat-and-potatoes concerns to be met. They want to hear why Oilbama voted for Dick Cheney's Energy Bill, while Hillary and McCain did not. Is Oilbama in the pocket of Big Oil? One can only assume so given his vote for this horrific bill crafted in secret by Big Oil Lobbyists.

user-pic

No they don't. Why would Democrats want to know why Obama didn't agree with McLame on a bill?

Give it a rest, blank. That's just stupid.

If you want to keep this up and miss the best election in my lifetime, go right ahead but I'll guarantee you'll be kicking yourself by the time we get him elected.

user-pic

Nice numbers you have there, where did you get them, your ass?

Here are the real numbers:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

Oh you poor, dead-ender rethug.

The skinny black guy with the funny name from the south side of Chicago will be YOUR next President.

Choke on it.

It looks like somebody's still in denial, though it is reassuringly tinged with healthy anger and a touch of bargaining).

You got your lies, your damned lies and your statistics working against you here. Let's do the math using only states where democratic primary voters are likely vote democratic in the general. Hillary was no more likely to deliver West Virginia and Kentucky (or any of "Appalachia")in the general than Obama.

On the other hand, Obama seems way more likely to deliver the western states he won come the real election.

And take a careful look at Obama's recent itinerary...

I wonder if it has occurred to Greg and company that the more Hillary stories they pump out, the more we'll be reading whiny, dishormonizing screeds from recalcitrant trolls like Dimbecil here. Wouldn't it better serve the purposes of unity to focus on Obama vs. McCain and leave the doings of Clinton's disablers to the ashcan of political failure?

There is no chance in hell Hillary is going to be the Veep. This topic is irrelevant. Hillary ran one heck of a campaign. Now she can get behind Obama and help to get him elected. I'm trying to be as polite as I can to Mrs. Clinton.

I agree with all I've read so far by thejoshuablog.
What a refreshing voice of clarity and sanity.

I am beside myself at the thought of a Cabinet that might include Edwards as Attorney General, Biden as Secretary of State, and other prominent, forward-thinking non-partisan leaders around the table, advising President Obama.

Vice President Cheney was sued by two watchdog groups—Sierra Club and Judicial Watch—for information about the outsiders who served on his energy policy task force in 2001. The watchdogs contend that "task force" was just a series of cozy get-togethers in which energy executives and lobbyists, including Ken Lay, took turns sitting on Cheney's lap, licking his ear, and requesting special favors. The final report issued by the commission sort of reads that way. When Cheney was ordered to produce the rosters and minutes of these meetings as part of pretrial discovery, he appealed that order all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. Why did Oilbama rush to vote for Dick Cheney's Energy Bill?

user-pic

He has explained that over and over, blank.

Ignore him, tena. Pure repub troll. We all need to pull together to just ignore the bait until Greg and Josh get around to banning them, as they really should.

Dimbulb, what's your point? Whose mind(s) do you think you'll change with this kind of whining?

I wish I was as confident as you kids are. I think the blowback against her from top surrogates and her dropping the talk and getting out quickly was done to resuscitate her VP aspirations. The old politico dogs like Rendell knew she was going about it all wrong and tried to right her VP ship.

Obama will not name a VP for months yet, meaning this episode will long be forgotten.

Maybe, but the vetting requirement will still be there.

user-pic

HE'S ALREADY BRINGING CHANGE:

from AP:
"In his first order of business as his party's presumed presidential nominee, Barack Obama is instructing the Democratic National Committee to adopt his policy against accepting donations from federal lobbyists or political action committees.

The change will make the party and the candidate have a consistent position..."

link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080605/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_money

He means it. He's doing it. We're moving forward.

Unbelievable, yet I believe. How ironic.

user-pic

Yes we are.


Didn't you get that yet? I got that loud and clear when he strong-armed Lieberman.


The Democrats are taking over.

user-pic

Yep, and he's also allowing the press to come to all of his fundraisers:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10871.html

How refreshing!!! It is indeed a new day! ;)

I find it VERY interesting that Hillary is effectively disqualified from the VP spot (potentially even disqualifying herself) over concerns about "vetting" her husband.

So I ask, if she is not a candidate for VP over concerns about Bill, how on earth did she expect to be the nominee for president??? The vetting would have happened eventually.

This story more than any other I've read recently, makes me really glad that Obama pulled this out. God knows what would have been exposed in the general election had Hillary won.


Clinton 17,802,300
Obama 17,501,751

I think it is clear that the majority of Clinton voters voted as much against Oilbama as they did for Clinton. Oilbama has no chance in the general but should take the time to explain why he voted for Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill. The worst bill in history if you care about the enviroment or not going to war in the Middle East.

Blah, Blah. Blah.

Hillary LOST you , dead-ender rethug.

The skinny black guy with the funny name from the south side of Chicago will be YOUR next President.

Choke on it.

user-pic

Honey, you keep cherry-picking those numbers and vote for McCain in the fall. No worries - President Obama will take care of you too! ;)

user-pic

Ok, then let's talk about Hillary's voting for Bush's war and not only voting for it, she got up and gave one hell of an impassioned speech in support of it.

The first major issue of the 21st century and she totally blew it.


The worst bill in history if you care about the enviroment or not going to war in the Middle East.

Dood!

Your candidate voted very specifically to go to war in the Middle East. Obama did not.

Be gone, please!

user-pic

so sad, living in an alternate reality. the real dem primary numbers are linked above, so i won't embarrass you again.

and i'll see your energy bill and raise you the aumf and the kyl/lieberman iran bill. absolutely shameful that hrc would accept either one.

does that number include the ones who wish they could take thier votes back?

user-pic

Smart move on the part of these congress people. You definitely don't help your cause by shoving it in obama's face. The clintons should take the hint.

user-pic

Yeah, see - blank has run run away.

chickenhawk - just like Hillary.

TenaX, that yellow glow you see in your rearview mirror is NOT the last of the yellow pantsuit. It is the sun come shining!!!
A new day.
Go Obama

From "Head of State"

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/vice-presidential-candidate-clinton.html

Friday, May 23, 2008

A Hypothetical Speech by Vice Presidential Candidate Clinton

Thank you for welcoming me here tonight. I know that we are all proud of Barack, who has risen from humble beginnings to such heights--great heights, perilous heights. As you may know, 30% of serious accidents occur from a height of 10 feet or above.

And so we now set out together on our journey--a journey of hope, a journey of change, and yes, a journey of great demands. For the Presidency places great demands on all of those who hold the office--we have seen how amazingly quickly it can age people in the poignant photographs of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was succeeded by Harry S. Truman while still in office.

In this journey, we will put forward our shared goals--of expanded health coverage, against the unexpected and often fatal illnesses that can rob even those citizens that seem the healthiest of their ability to work, even of their lives.

Of protection against unexpected attack on our country, often aimed at those who are placed in the most critical positions to lead this nation. Of conservation of our precious energy resources, without which, even the most powerful of us can wind up stranded in a desert motorcade, without food, water, or wireless reception to contact others for help. Of greater support for culture and the arts--beginning with increased support for our very own Ford's Theatre here in Washington, DC.

Many of you will hear Barack speak later today, from a platform in Norman, Oklahoma--a humble platform, a rickety platform, a platform susceptible to Norman's notoriously strong and unexpected winds. There--god willing--he will tell you of what we hope to accomplish. He will speak of the unity that he and I wish to achieve for this nation, just as Andrew Johnson and Lincoln strove for such national unity. And he will tell you of our wish for change.

Change. An important word. None of us can know the changes that will occur in our lives. None of us can predict what momentous events, what disasters may befall us. A simple damaged left engine turbine stabilizer in a campaign plane. A frayed electrical line dangling, unseen, from a remote access satellite hookup van. A safe, falling, unexpectedly, to the sidewalk from the 8th floor of the Hotel Aldion in Norman, Oklahoma.

And so, we must dedicate ourselves, consecrate ourselves, to reach these most important national objectives today--while we still can. And like Kennedy, Garfield, McKinley, and other Presidents before him, we know that Barack will strive to achieve these goals--in the face of the awesome unknowns that lay before us all.

Thank you.

Cite:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/vice-presidential-candidate-clinton.html

How long Lord, how long will we have to suffer the domination of the news cycles by the Clintons? Can You Lord God Almighty just make them go away? I'm starting to think that the corporate media will never focus on Obama and McCain, because the comparison is laughable. Even Fox and Free Republic are ashamed of their guy. The longer they can keep us thinking about and talking about Hillary and Bill, the longer they keep the glaring inadequacies of the "maverick" out of plain view. Expect the MSM to drum up something outrageous that will allow the Clintons to hog attention as long as possible--Bill gets public BJ by famous actress? Hillary falling down drunk in the Senate? Marriage counseling and legal separation (finally acknowledged)? Hillary living with a lesbian? Doesn't have to be true--just plausible. Just enough to keep us entertained and distracted until it's time to vote. We have no need to know what the policy differences are between the two candidates--the MSM will tell us who we prefer when the time comes to cast our vote.

blank is a reference to what is between his ears!

barack is amazing...just amazing! No money from lobbyists...smackdown on Punkass Lieberman...Webb and Warner on the trail already with him in a red state..blew off Hillary's drama...Kennedy on his VP search team...let's go and on...and it's just two days since he clinched the nomination!..I feel great as I look ahead...FIRED UP and READY TO GO!!!

I'm glad they came to their senses. The last thing this party needs is more of its own running amok and behaving badly. If they really want unity, as they keep saying, then doing things like "demanding" she be on the ticket is certainly not the way to go about it. Has there ever been a public demand made of a nominee in this way before? How absolutely insane and juvenile. This group had no idea what they were doing, but apparently someone with some brains and a lot of reason informed them, and now they see the light.

This whole episode is truly sad. Clinton and her surrogates have managed to ruin a great moment in American history. I hope they're proud of themselves. Later -- years from now, maybe months -- I predict they'll look back on this whole affair and be very, very ashamed.

Barack's Veep vetters: Johnson is obvious, Kennedy is intriguing... but Eric Holder?

Holder was Acting AG in the last days of Clinton I, and I believe his fingerprints are all over the god-awful March Rich pardon.

Dick Morris is... a dick, but he's right that Obama is now stuck with fallout from this for no reason at all:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obamas_vp_search_mistake_114031.htm

There are dozens of high-profile Dem lawyers who could do this job. Why pick someone with such evident baggage?


Great news! Howard Dean is staying on as the head of the DNC!!!

So, since Dean is taken how about Hillary as Secretary of Health and Human Services. Personally, I think she'd be great and would really push to get our healthcare system in order, and hopefully give us universal healthcare (a tall order). You know she'd work hard for it!

I can live with Hillary as Secretary of HHS.
But I'd prefer her to remain carpetbag Senator from NY.

I can also easily live with Obama strong-arming Lieberman...it's about time a real Democrat showed some backbone with that weasel from CT. He deserves a b!tch-slap and then shown the door, IMHO.

Now we're setting the DNC back on the correct path.

It's going to be a glorious next 8 years!

Bill and Hillary Clinton has shown nothing but contempt and disrespect for Barack Obama, and for the people who voted for him.
Rewarding them for the consistency of their contempt seems like a really depressing idea.

Finally realizing that Obama can't be blackmailed, eh?

Where's gotnolife when you need him? Obama is a very shrewd politician. Carolyn Kennedy? Good move. Taking his time? Good move. Leading Lieberman (by the hand) to a deeper understanding of party? Great move. This is one black man who will not allow himself to be "one-downed" by anyone. I'm sure that's what pisses his critics off most. Once all the air has been let out of the Clinton inflatable sheep the race against McCain is going to get really interesting. Can't wait to see who he does pick for VP.

It is truly pathetic that Obama supporters like thejoshuablog mock the truth by spouting false GOP talking points about the Clintons.

I guess Obama supporters didn't get the memo about unity and respect being the centerpoint of his campaign.

Or maybe it was never a centerpoint to begin with.

I'm thinking the latter.

I think his point is that these are GOP talking points that they would use against us in the General with Clinton on the ticket.

Fall in love for the primaries, fall in line for the general.

This whole episode is truly sad. Obama and his surrogates have managed to ruin what could have been a great moment in American history - a woman as president or a black and woman as president and VP. I hope they're proud of themselves. Later -- years from now, maybe months -- I predict they'll look back on this whole affair and be very, very ashamed at their blatant racism and misogyny, their false accusations against the Clintons, and their hypocrisy about being uniters instead of dividers.

Nahhhhh. Arrogant, self-serving, and delusional cultists are never apologetic about their actions.

Lord, McCain is a toad, but he is not Bush revisited like Obama will be. Please save us from another eight years of arrogant and dismissive abuse of half of the country in service to a narrow vision of self-righteous self-adoration where the primary focus is on the needs of a single individual rather than the needs of the country. Please save us from Obushama and the Echobama Chamber.

user-pic

Talk about repeating false gop talking points. Too funny.

Nobama. Do you realize what your name means, and yet you are lamenting the lack of party unit. Get thee to a detox clinic, at once, so that you can break your addiction to Stupidity Pills.

That's rich coming from a racist.

Meant THAT comment for NoObama, Liam! Sorry!!!!

Go ahead, Nobama, kiss your toad of a McCain. But I warn you, you'll get a Lime Green Monster, not a Prince Charming.

Talk about repeating false gop talking points. Too funny.

Another repudiation of Obama's central message.

Yet more proof that Obama supporters aren't about a new politics, but very much about the old partisan, kick-the-when-they-are-down, shove-their-faces-in-it, screw-everybody-who-isn't-us, hatemongering politics.

Not really all that funny after eight years of the same.

Using your logic (by the followers, you shall know the leader), I take it that you have a pretty dim view of Christianity.

user-pic

Huh? You are a crack up.

In the delusional world of Obamaniacs, trashing Bush constitutes "false GOP talking points."

LOL!

user-pic

Hillary who?

Nobama.

Do you realize what your name means, and yet you are lamenting the lack of party unit. Get thee to a detox clinic, at once, so that you can break your addiction to Stupidity Pills.

You wish, GMFORD!

51% of Democrats Back Obama-Clinton Ticket

Once again, the Hillary Haters are in the minority.

And thanks again for your display of hate and disunity which will continue to undermine the credibility of Obama's [false] message.

The only hate I see is yours for Obama. I would suggust falling in line like the numerous Hillary supporters who were in St. Paul cheering on Obama the night he clinched the nomination.

The Clinton supporters sitting next to my boyfriend and I were graitous and supportive. I suggest you try it and you will find unity a bit easier.

user-pic

Thank the deity of your personal choice.

What false GOP talking points did Obama repeat?
Name one. Insted of still trying to pull Obama down why don't you try to find out what Obama really stands for. Insted of the smear job you are trying to do to him.
You are going to vote for McBush because Obama is like GWB? Now that's funny!!!

More inane comments from the stay at homes who have never ran a political campaign. If the choice of the VP running mate was ever going to affect the outcome of a race then explain Dan Quail.

The last i knew we still had a democracy.You don't demand who you want as your leaders.They are chosen then voted on. This is not a dictatorship.Rep. Schultz should know that.She is letting show her arrogance,bias,over zealous desire for women to win and get what they want.

josephcast: The Clinton supporters sitting next to my boyfriend and I were graitous and supportive.

Of course they were, as they always have been in the face of vicious, hateful, and dishonest attacks from Obama supporters, such as the students in West Virgina who hurled insults at Clinton supporters as they went to the polls.

Unlike Obama supporters who have been ungracious, unsupportive, belittling of and dishonest about Clinton and her campaign throughout.

melvo: If the choice of the VP running mate was ever going to affect the outcome of a race then explain Dan Quail.

"Dan Quail?"

Is that some kind of newfangled bird?

1992 explains Dan Quayle very well - he did eventually affect the ticket (from the Wikipedia):

As Bush lagged in the polls in the weeks preceding the August 1992 Republican National Convention, some Republican strategists (led by Secretary of State James Baker III), viewed Quayle as a liability to the ticket and pushed for his replacement.[15] Quayle survived the challenge and secured re-nomination.[16]

You implicitly claim to be some kind of political campaign insider who has it all over the "stay-at-homes" and yet are totally ignorant of how to spell Dan Quayle's name.

God, the arrogance and ignorance of Obamaniacs is appalling.

You can't even take two seconds to google Bush 41's VP to come up with the correct spelling.

There is nothing worse than an elitist Obamaniac who demonstrates no reason for his/her self-perceived and self-anointed elitism, but instead shows how truly uninterested in detailed facts he/she is.

Just like the Bush administration and its supporters who have consistently championed emotional sound bites over scientific, technical, or even just basic facts.

calhar2933: You don't demand who you want as your leaders.

Hilarious from Obama supporters who demanded Obama be anointed leader long before the voting was over and demanded that Clinton drop out long before the voting was over.

Too, too ironic is the hypocrisy of the Obamaniacs.

The demand for Clinton to bow out of the race was reasonable based on the math and dynamics of the contest and on the urgency to engage the Republican nominee.

The demand for Obama to choose Clinton as running mate is stupidity.

Brilliant notes on Hillary. Well said.

Bluesplashy is right but you did leave out Travelgate from the Clinton's long resume.

"dismissive abuse of half of the country in service to a narrow vision of self-righteous self-adoration where the primary focus is on the needs of a single individual rather than the needs of the country"

you know, if one didn't read the entire entry from nobama... one would think that the above quote is a dead ringer description of hillary

"ohio has spoken" "pennsylvania has decided" "south dakota had the last word"... is that not ignoring the other voters who decided differently?

go back and count how many "me"s which were uttered by hillary in her non-concession speech and compared it to obama's and see where her primary focus is

I cannot see clinton anywhere in the WH. HHS either.
Its kind of like that Ben Stiller/Jack Black movie Envy.
His wife chose a platform to run on. The environment, while at the same time her husband was the wealthy inventor of Va-Pooh-rize(sp)
So, in short, Hilary wouldnt be able to tell us where the shit goes - until you look in her pocket.

Losers do not dictate the terms. The gall!

Oprah for VP! Oprah for VP!

And speaking of narcissism, uh, TheJoshuaBlog sure likes to hear himself talk!

Oprah for vice president! Oprah for vice president!

CrabbyGolightly.com

There are hundreds of reason not to have her as VEEP, but today there is one. Hillary creates too much drama. I do believe she found out last nigh there's a new sheriff in town, and she had better shut down her idiotic people in the house, or he will.

Obama is ofically the NEW leader of the DNC and frankly he doesn't play stupid stuff, unorganized stuff, embarrasing stuff, and most of all posturing and arrogance.

VEEP? She had better work on maintaining her seat in the Senate. And as fot those 17+ million voters she calims as 'hers' minus the 7 or 8 million that were republicans voting for her to throw the race......are democrats. She doesn't own these people the way she does her house folks.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address