« McCain Invites Obama To Series Of Weekly Town-Hall Meetings | Home | Pelosi Says The Dem Primary Is Over, Declares Obama The "Nominee" »
Hillary Ally Says She Authorized Him To Launch Campaign To Make Her Veep
A bunch of people have reported this morning that Robert Johnson, the founder of BET and a key Hillary supporter, has launched a public campaign to get Obama to offer her the Veep slot.
But it's in this interview that Johnson said some truly revealing stuff...
Johnson said he began discussing the vice presidency with Clinton last month and that they talked about it at a dinner in Puerto Rico last Saturday and again by phone and e-mail on Tuesday. "Let me be clear," Johnson said in a telephone interview Wednesday morning. "She said if asked to do this, she must accept because she believes that it is in the best interest of the party that the party come together and win in November."
So according to Johnson, she was discussing the Veepstakes as early as last month, and even said that she would accept the Veep slot if asked. And there's more...
Johnson said he talked specifically with Clinton on Tuesday about his intentions. "She said, 'Go ahead,'" he recalled, although asked that he wait until Wednesday to do so.
In other words, Hillary basically authorized Johnson to launch the campaign. This is all pretty suggestive stuff. We're going to follow up with Johnson and will bring you more if we can get it.
Advertisement















Hillary as VP?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MiKntEWnfo
June 4, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I knew there was a trick buried in there somewhere. The Billary-for-Veep campaign is for entertainment only.
Somebody please tell DiFi!
June 4, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
And, unfortunately, the Hillary for President campaign is the entertainment gift that keeps on giving!
June 4, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bob Johnson does not seem like the person to get this done.
June 4, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the same guy who brought up cocaine way back when, right?
I doubt Obama is too happy with him.
June 4, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm looking forward to voting for Barack Hussein Obama in November.
Sincerely,
MiddleNameLincoln
June 4, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a cliche by now but I'll repeat it:
If Obama picks Hillary I'll lose all respect for him.
June 4, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
We don't have to guess who went to dinner!
June 4, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Clinton hasn't denounced and rejected the support of Bob Johnson yet?
And they have the nerve to act upset at Pfleger?
June 4, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
my sentiments exactly.
June 4, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I know if I wanted someone to campaign for me to be VP, it would be the same person who made controversial statements about Obama's past drug use as part of the Clinton race-baiting campaign, among other things:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/01/jesse-jackson-plan-or-clinton-plan-b.html
Yeah good pick.
So much for the idea of having Obama offer it to her and her turning it down to help her save face.
Just say HELL NO to the nightmare ticket!
June 4, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too funny, Johson? That is a hoot. I am again thinking that she doesn't want to be vp. Too funny.
June 4, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good God...can't wait to flush these folks away...Bob Johnson leader of the pack of attack dogs Hillary sent by to get Barack...kiss my ass Bob Johnson!
June 4, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
More anonymous Obama staffers leaking nonsense...
June 4, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The quotes came from an interview with Johnson, you can't blame Obama's camp for this one!
June 4, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
haha! Oh ye of little faith.
June 4, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
He don't know Dijamo, do he?
June 4, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is a flying Kansan domicile when you really need one?!?!
June 4, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been asking myself that same question... So if you think you're the only person who is clicking their heels together these days, there's a shoe shine guy at the end of my block wearing a Rolex.
June 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. Na. Ga. Ha. Pen.
2. Johnson's credibility isn't exactly sky-high. Nor is he the person to whom she would entrust a delicate job.
June 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder what the Obama campaign is doing today? How did that speech go over?
Didn't Clinton deny this up and down the other day? Wasn't the AP kinda taking to task on this site for reporting what turned out to be true?
Didn't anything come out of that speech earlier? I mean I know Hiilary said some things, cause I read a post here.
I wonder what Hillary thinks about those debates McCain is callig for?
Are there any other people up for the VP slot? I wonder what Hillary thinks of them?
June 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. This IS surprising. Kind of puts her last month of campaigning and her speech last night into new light. Forcing Obama's hand to giver her the VP spot? Perhaps.
In any case, I saw quite a bit of Hillary supporters supporting Obama last night. I do not think we need her on the ticket, especially that now that Obama is the official nominee.
We need someone that will offer us a swing state win, preferably a governor.
I'll admit, after being in the Xcel Center last night, I think it could work, possibly. If anyone could make it work, it would be Obama and his campagin. But Hillary has a lot of work to do if she wants this spot. She has got to woo him. She has to apologize for her war vote. She has to suspend her campaign.
Unfortunately, I do not see any of that happening any time soon.
Overall, I think Obama can find his own VP, he won, it's his right. More importantly, Clinton's campagin going like it is only ensures that he won't. He cannot cave in with her still running and dividing this electorate. More importantly it can't look like he is caving.
Choosing his own VP would show leadership. The Democrats will unite whoever the VP will be. Of that, I am assured by the Hillary supporters who sat next to me in St. Paul and cheered on Obama with me.
June 4, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, I think Hillary is a bad choice for V.P.
As we've all said, Obama has a big job ahead of him. He can't worry about managing both Bill and Hillary--both of whom love the spotlight and love having the world revolve around them.
So, Hillary does have a lot of supporters that, if we want to win in November, need to be addressed. Plus, we have to get the independents and the moderate republicans A V.P. really has no power. What else might Hillary be offered? While I would love so say Ambassador to Ecuador, I was hit with the thought of Secretary of State. A powerful position for her.
There's a gamble there, of course. But she might be a really good one.
V.P--I'm still thinking Warner. Webb is a good choice, too.
June 4, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Supreme Court Justice Hillary Rodham Clinton
June 4, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree.
It's the one thing he could offer that might actually appeal to her that doesn't involve being VP. And I think she'd make a good justice.
The problem is, no one can ever publicly acknowledge such a deal, if one is cut. So they would have to be very careful how they do this.
June 4, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Plus once she's on the SC, it's for LIFE . . . no zombie Hillary reappearing in 2012 or 2016 . . .
June 4, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree about the Supreme Court appointment on the basis of her questionable ethics and integrity.
June 4, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary who?
June 4, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most people just call her the mean pants lady.
June 4, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe if Barack is "in the neighborhood" he can stop by and tell Bob Johnson to blow it out his ass.
June 4, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is going to be so disappointed when she hears that Joe Biden has been offered the VP position.
June 4, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Link?
June 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
From your lips (well, fingers) to God's ears (eyes?).
June 4, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Childish and pathetic.
June 4, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, off topic, but this is going to keep coming up, and McCain keeps ignoring it, even though he wrote about it in his book and has admitted as much. He won't talk about it now AT ALL.
During his stop in Nashville on Wednesday, McCain was asked if he was "going to talk about" his "own situation," in the context of how infidelity is as serious a threat to the sanctity of marriage as is gay unions.
"There is nothing," the questioner asked, "you see long-term couples splitting up, it's, it's just crazy...I know that you, your own situation, you're going to have to address that in the campaign. Infidelity is just a terrible cancer on this country....and I think if we're going to talk about...gay marriage, it has to be in the context of the preservation of marriage."
McCain drifted around the personal implication by reiterating his opposition to the marriage of same-sex couples. "I just believe in the sanctity and the unique status of marriage between a man and a woman.," he said to cheers in the crowd.
June 4, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the next 2-3 weeks when the first wave of Obama-McCain general polls comes out, it will be critical. If BO has a comfortable lead early on, say 5-9% pts, Hillary can forget the VP. If its close, I can understand him thinking about her, but if the early vibes is that BO has a clear national momentum, hillary is toast as VP.
June 4, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
No. Period. End of Story.
There mere fact Hillary Clinton is even sending out very strong signals – today of all days – exemplifies exactly why she’d be a nightmare choice as Obama’s VP. She is a Narcissist. Here are the numerous reasons, beside the narcissism, that make her ineligible for Obama’s VP:
1. If the first major decision Obama makes is seen as being forced upon him – as taking Hillary Clinton on as his VP pick would be – he’d immediately start from a weakened position.
2. Change: Senator Clinton DOES NOT represent change. She represents the status quo. She represents the exact opposite. We all know it. Republicans won’t forget that. Neither will Obama’s supporters.
3. 2 Senators on a ticket would be a disaster.
4. 2016: Hillary offers nothing for a 16 year run – these types of things must be considered if we are going to really turn back the clock on 40 years of destructive conservative rule.
5. New York State will be won no matter who Obama choose as VP.
6. Hillary’s numerous lies: Not just the recent ones like Sniper Fire, NAFTA, etc.
7. Hillary's ethics problems from the early 1970s while in Washington as a lawyer.
8. Hillary’s Rose Law Firm work: attacked the credibility of an alleged 12 year old rape victim
9. Hillary’s Union-busting WalMart work.
10. Hillary’s religious cult: Doug Coe.
11. Hugh Rodham
12. Norman Hsu: Over $800,000 in illegal donations. How many other Hsu’s are there?
13. Vince Foster (lie or not doesn’t matter).
14. NAFTA & The Clinton’s Chinese connections.
15. Bill: Saudi Arabia & his other foreign business dealings.
16. Bill: Impeachment
17. Bill: Library Fundraisers
18. Bill: Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broderick and ALL the current “affairs.”
19. Bill: “Speaking fees” from Foreign Governments that helped HRC loan money to her campaign.
20. Bill: Sandy Berger
21. Bill: 9/11 – True or not, he will be blamed.
22. Bill: Mena, Arkansas (state officials were involved in some way with alleged illegal cocaine importation, money laundering while Bill was Governor).
23. Bill: Webb Hubbell; Bill’s associate AG (Plead guilty on federal mail fraud & tax evasion charges).
24. Bill & Hillary: Whitewater.
25. Bill’s Pardons: Don Tyson (Chicken), Marc Rich
26. Bill: Illegal donations from Canadian tycoon Frank Giustra
27. And finally this must be said regarding Hillary's RFK remarks: God forbid something happened to you; she’d be LBJ to your JFK. NO WAY.
While unthinkable, Obama must seriously take this into consideration. LBJ didn’t end the war he knew JFK was about too. Neither would HRC regarding Iraq. She is a war hawk, just like Joe Lieberman. She is an entranced DLC sell-out who has no intention of standing up to the military industrial complex. Obama’s Vice Presidential pick must be someone who won’t immediately deviate from his policies if the unthinkable happens.
Obama will to pick someone who emphasizes and magnifies the qualities he embodies and has been running on – not someone who conventional wisdom says must fill some “magical void” he has.
He will pick someone who is also another from-the-beginning anti-Iraq war proponent; someone who like him, is an obvious change candidate; one who is progressive; from a state he or she can help us win and is not tied to the Clintons or the DLC in any way, shape or form.
Bill Clinton ignored conventional wisdom when picked another DLC southerner in Al Gore. It was one of the smartest things he actually did.
June 4, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have to agree with all you numberings. All stuff the GOP would roll out against her and thus, Obama. I believe her vote for the war, and her lack of an apology, is her number one disqualifier.
June 4, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Clinton (and Bill) have NOT been vetted. Not like they should be as a VP prospect.
If they were, they'd fail miserably.
June 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
NOT been vetted? Are you serious?
Whether or not you think she'd be a good or even acceptable Veep, how can you reasonably say they haven't been "vetted" after almost 20 years in the public eye, and having been subject to an insane level of scrutiny and suspicion?
June 4, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's very reasonable to say that they haven't been vetted. There has been little scrutiny of their 8 years since leaving the White House. How much investigating have you seen of the Clinton Library's donor lists or Bill's questionable business dealings with Ron Burkle or what exactly Bill's been doing with new bff Steve Bing?
I think Obama made a conscious decision not to run a dirty campaign against Hillary so there was little incentive for the press to chase these stories. Do you really think the right-wing would be quite so gracious running against her in a general election?
June 4, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
They still haven't released their 2007 tax returns.
June 4, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
They have NOT been vetted, not for the past 8 years. Not by a long shot.
She couldn't pass a VP selection vetting process.
Obama's camp know it, and it's why they bring it up immediately when asked about her as VP.
She will have to submit whatever Obama ask for and she won't be able to. Not on their finances, the foundations funding, the library funding, his speaking fees and Saudi ties & Chinese connections. None of it.
She can;'t and wont' do it.
She will NEVER be VP.
If you think she got this far during this campaign becuase she was already vetted, you haven't been paying attention to the things I listed the Obama did NOT bring up as a way to take her down.
Had he, this primary would have been over in February. He chose not to do that to a fellow Dem.
She, on the other hand had no problems using whatever was at her disposal becuase she has absolutely NO ethics whatsoever.
He ran his campaign against her with one hand tied behind his back out of respect for her, the party and President Clinton.
June 4, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
No they haven't been vetted...
You are thinking of the old drama scandals, there are new ones that MSM hasn't even touched... The Vanity Fair article was just a taster of the new drama that could have been raised in a Clinton VP side show.
She is not a wise choice for VP -- the leadership knows it [bless you Pelosi] -- it would be an absolute disaster for the Party!
We have our nominee, Obama. I'm looking forward to focusing on McCain and winning the election in November. We need to move on. Clinton lost the nomination.
June 4, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The mere fact that we were all a little surprised by their income over the past few years should show you how little we really know about what's been going on with the Clintons since leaving the White House. Granted, we all figured that they'd made good money, but it was obvious that very few knew it would amount to about $110 million. And that's just the basic number with no context. There are lots of questions out there on some of Bill's ties over the last almost-decade. Like it or not, there IS a lot here we don't know about.
June 4, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Not vetted at all. And all of the stuff from 92-00 is fair game too, fair or not.
She would be a disaster on the ticket and NEVER HAD A CHANCE of winning in the first place. Last thing we need is to give the disaffected wing nuts a reason to vote.
June 4, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
No. 2 is the most crucial reason. His initial decision as the nominee CANNOT run TOTALLY COUNTER to his chief campaign theme.
June 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, no VP for HRC -- she is married to Bilbo Baggage.
But this VP thing has to be a red herring; even HRC would not put a serious lobbying effort for VP into Johnson's hands.
Nonetheless, look what she has successfully accomplished: here we are, sucked into the wind tunnel of What Does Hillary Want?
June 4, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bilbo Baggage! HA!
June 4, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad Bob Johnson is taking the lead on this. He's probably the WORST honest broker in the Clinton camp (save, maybe, Lanny Davis and Ambassador Wilson). This pretty much guarantees that this VP shit is going nowhere fast.
June 4, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
She doesn't want to be a VP, she wants to be a Godmother.
Did any one watch Lou Dobbs pushing hard for the Hillary Veep case on his show.
June 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gross. I'm really glad I don't watch CNN anymore.
June 4, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
God, I absolutely abhore Lou Dobbs - self-important, officious, vile, racist, bigoted narcissist. I can't even watch him for more than about a nanosecond before wanting to put my foot through the TV. He is, quite simply, an asshole, no better than Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity.
June 4, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans would get to use all of the oppo research they have prepared for years on Hillary, plus they could use her words against Obama as well.
Nancy Reagan was right.
Just say no.
June 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
plus they could use her words against Obama as well.
They already are.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bG4Oezg6wQ
June 4, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
How is this woman considered a feminist when she's associated with a misogynist like Bob Johnson.
Oh well. I guess it's only misogyny if you are a white woman.
June 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is what is so freaking amazing!!! How can Hillary even be associated with such a POS like Bob Johnson. Video
June 4, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's my question:
If he doesn't offer it to her, what's she gonna do exactly? Tell everyone she really wanted it, and that he snubbed her? That's like advertising that you don't have a date to the dance.
I mean, she'll look silly talking like that. If she wants power (and she does) she has to appear that, if the position is not offered to her, it was beneath her anyway.
June 4, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's just typical Clintonian triangulation: alienate Obama's supporters by using the kitchen sink, rile her supporters up by claiming that the nomination was stolen from her, and then sit back and say "The only way you can unite the party is by putting me on the ticket."
Obama needs to quash this and do it fast. Until he does, the story will continue to be about her. Enough with all of Bill and Hillary's drama.
June 4, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me, or is this perfectly of a piece with Hillary's none-too-subtle attempts over the past several months to fatally wound Obama's electoral hopes in the fall, presumably based on the expectation that she could then "ride to the rescue" of the party in 2012?
Perhaps I'm too much of a conspiracy theorist, but combined with her "red meat" speech last night, she seems to be trying to poison the well by offering herself as an alternative even though she KNOWS there is no way he would ever select her, such that her partisans will have some justification in their own minds for refusing to support Obama going forward.
June 4, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not just you; I was thinking the same thing.
The best thing Obama can do now (regarding this VP thing) is just ignore it, and the media fever will likely fade.
But what other nasty tricks will the Clintonistas pull between now and November? I am skeptical about Hillary's claims that she really wants to get a Democrat elected this fall. (Nope, she wants Hillary to get elected. Period. And if not this year, then 2012 will have to do.)
-- ARG
(P.S. Hey, how 'bout those Cubs?!)
June 4, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any Obama team with Clinton on it will be leaked to death through FAUX News.Obama does not need that kind of drama in his admin.Can you inagine all these corrupt creeps like Lanny Davis & Robert Johnson bringing their business interest into Obama's Admin.What a sick thought.It's time to turn the page.
June 4, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I posted this on another thread, but it is more appropriate here. This is the way to handle the clintons. According to obama, they will be talking over the next few weeks. Go obama, marginalize them as much as possible.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0608/Obama_on_Clinton_Well_be_talking.html
In a couple of weeks, they will be totally marginalized. The clintons want vp discussions now to grab more media attention and obama plans on ignoring them at this point. Good move Obama.
June 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, please keep on ignoring the B.S. floating out of the Clinton campaign.
Hillary's supporters united behind Obama last night at he Xcel Center. Why can't Hillary? Honor your supporters and do so, Senator Clinton. They worked hard for you, now work hard for their wishes- and support Obama and the Democratic party.
June 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
don't forget, Harold Ickes has a petition drive going on to get her on the ticket.
June 4, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's Lanny Doofus running the petition, not Icky.
June 4, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anything but more drama, more Lanny Davis, more MacAuliffe, Wolfson et al.
One bright note: Hillary Rosen of Huffington, an HRC devotee, admits to being disappointed by HRC's failure to concede or at least congratulate Obama. So there is hope for transitioning HRC support to Obama.
June 4, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. And, NO!
June 4, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
To summarize: no.
June 4, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bob Johnson? Really? Anyone else find the notion absurd that it would be Bob Johnson--of all people!-- they'd ask to speak on their behalf? Bob Johnson? That feckless little cypher?
OK, maybe they did... but THAT would be even more absurd! Ugh.
June 4, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Bob Johnson is on this VP thing, I'm sure it won't happen. Hillary can't be serious if she is using a loud mouth idiot like Johnson for this.
This VP thing is the only way Hillary can stay in the press. She can't accept going back to the senate with no reporters following her around.
June 4, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Traditionally VP candidates were not picked until the week of the convention. Senator Obama should just wait it out, and let Hillary twist slowly in the wind. He won. She lost. He owes her nothing. She tried to beat his brains in. Why does she deserve to be rewarded for that.
The winner goes on. The loser must be ignored.
June 4, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it me or is this the first time in history that someone has run a public campaign for VP??
June 4, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes, and Hillary is all about making history--no matter what the cost.
June 4, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
In fairness, Jesse Jackson has been accused of running a semi-public campaign for VP in 1988. But it was nothing like this.
June 4, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
well she won the popular vote, won the BIG democratic states and won the swing states and has the experience to lead.....
So Obama should be forced into picking her as his VP.
I hope that Obama picks her as his VP before she concedes the race.
Obama/Clinton '08
McCain/??? '08
we shall win :):)
June 4, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand the mantra that Hillary has the experience to lead. And, her campaign was a mess.
Hey, here's an idea, I mean she's already laid the groundwork for him, so she should be a V.P. candidate for the person she's worked so hard for:
McCain/Clinton
June 4, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Her candidacy is dead. She will NEVER be VP. You're a joke thinking otherwise.
June 4, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is actually a very good sign that "HillaryClinton08" thinks she will get the VP nod. I can't remember her ever being right about anything, so this means she definitely will not be the VP.
Yippee!
June 4, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I understand why you would want this since you have given Hillary so much support. However, I think this is a bad idea to make the ticket a winner.
Listen to Obama's speech last night. Hillary will have a large role to play in his cabinet one way or another, I believe. He seemed to suggest he'd be willing to let her lead on the healthcare front. Secretary of Health and Human Services?
Don't rule Obama out if he doesn't award her the VP slot. Chances are she'll be much more effective in some other role.
June 4, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think what you meant to say was that she won some of the popular vote, a couple of the big states and a respectable number of swing states.
I now its a small thing, but I get a little touchy when people make bullshit claims about the popular vote...
June 4, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Personally, I don't want a president who lets himself get forced into doing things.
June 4, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hiring Bob Johnson for this task is a sure way to insult the largest, most faithful contingent of Obama supporters. There's very few people with less credibility amongst African-Americans than Bob Johnson. His "Black Entertaiment Television" is a minstrel show, and he's largely responsible. (Thank goodness for TVOne.)
If you're going to convince me that a joint ticket is the best idea, this wasn't a good start.
June 4, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Plus, their reruns of The Wire get interrupted every five minutes with commercials.
June 4, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's in the best interest of the country if Hillary gets some therapy and realizes she is damaging the party, the country and her legacy.
June 4, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
You also have to consider the fact that just 5 months ago he was calling Obama a drug dealer. He also thinks the "death tax" is unfair. If Hillary knew what was good for her, he would tell her to tell this clown to stand down. The continued use of black tokens in the media to rebut Obama is tiresome.
June 4, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Hillary wants the VP slot, she just wants her followers to believe she wants it. Then when Obama picks someone else, Hillary's followers will be angry, say she's been slighted, cry they've been disrespected, and shout that Obama, his supporters, and the media are elitist misogynists. This was behind the "I want my supporters to be respected" comment. I believe Hillary is manipulating her rabid followers to ensure that they will stay home or support McCain, so that Hillary can run again in 2012.
Hillary and her husband have both said deeming things about Obama during the campaign, and these marginalizing comments as well as their feeling that they would be co-presidents with Obama all make a joint ticket a very bad idea. Hillary knows Obama can't pick her now, so she's safe in saying she wants the VP position. It's a brilliant tactic, actually. The Clintons are not amateurs.
June 4, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear. Same point I made above thread. Glad to hear I'm not alone in my cynical interpretation of Billary's motivation. :-)
June 4, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
You all will do as you are told and like it. That is all. Obama/Clinton 08 lololololololololololo
June 4, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, this is progress. Not too long ago you were solemnly informing us that the ticket would be Clinton/Obama and that it could not lose. Now you have at least come around to seeing that Obama will be at the top of the ticket. Slowly but surely it seems that you will catch up. ;-)
June 4, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
SELF-SERVING AND SELF-SERVING ALONE. Very, very sad! Hasn't she done enough damage already?
June 4, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I authorize you to end that campaign now please
June 4, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
After all these months...all this crap......she is still there......after the Dems win.......after 8 years......she will be your Queen......it's priceless......it's just so funny.......it's beyond words. She still gets her way.
June 4, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
She lost. The Clintons are on their way out. Put on the man pants and deal with it.
June 4, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's no reason to believe Obama has any intention, or ever has had, of offering her the veepination.
As recently as last night he congratulated her and assured the audience in St. Paul that she would be instrumental in passing health-coverage policy. She doesn't need to be the veep to do that.
I've also read some reports -- sorry, can't provide links -- by his staffers saying he doesn't consider that he needs the votes of Clinton's most rabid and egotistical supporters -- my words, not his -- and doesn't plan to do much, if anything, to court them. Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke -- again, my words.
All of the talk is coming whence it doesn't matter: Clinton. All she appears to be doing is more of what she's been doing for several months: grasping at straws.
June 4, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
When shes VP.....she'll be running the show anyway just like Dickey Boy does now. She will be policy chief. Running all the Health Care Policies. It'll be great. Can't wait.
June 4, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Kefa, sorry about your candidate. By the way, your point is exactly why obama would never in a million years name the clintons as co-vp nominees. Sorry.
June 4, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, VP has almost no power... unless the President give it to them like Bush did with Cheney.
Does anyone really think Obama will give her any real power?
In fact, that might be just what he tells her:
"I'll make you VP, but you must know you will be relegated to a ceremonial position. You will have no power. If you think you can handle ribbon cuttings and dinners I can't attend, the job is yours."
June 4, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Robert Johnson has made his share of bomb-throwing statements. There's always been a clean-up on Aisle 9 necessary afterwards. And here we are, ooohing and ahhing his comments, as if this is some sort of consensus of the Black community.
Well it isn't. A rabid Hillary supporter, Johnson would not be out there, saying what he's saying now, if this weren't a surrogate action on the part of Hillary. These people can't do anything straight-out in the open and above-board.
Bottom line: Obama's success, contrary to CW, is NOT predicated on wooing a fringe of disgruntled older females (the angry lady at the Rules Commitee hearing). This is a HYPE. NOR is he beholden to Robert Johnson's insinuation that he's any kind of "typical" voice of the Black community.
I trust Obama's team will make their own moves, and not get pressured by any of these little campaigns that are popping up like gophers.
June 4, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Love American Style 08
June 4, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two brief thoughts:
1) I have managed to wrap my mind around the idea that she wants the VP slot (the evidence is too overwhelming to ignore). I have still not managed, however, to figure out why she would want it. It is not a great honor to be VP and it seems to me that it would be quite a step down for her. It is not the most important question in the world, but I wish I knew why she wants such an unflattering job offer.
2) Obama knows better than me what he needs to do, and I will trust his instincts over my own. That said, I think that he needs to pick a VP quickly. The longer that we go without one, the longer the chattering class will have to talk up the idea of an Obama/Clinton ticket and thus the more disaffected her supporters will be when she does not get picked. Better, I think, to dash this hope quickly.
June 4, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree on both counts 100%. But especially #1. I can't understand why she'd want what is essentially a ceremonial post. She's not going to be Obama's Cheney.
June 4, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Answer: 2012.
To the CW bound mind, being the VP on a losing ticket is a key to the White House.
No one thinks she can be thinking about 2012 because it is so patently delusional, but what has she done in this campaign, so far, that would lead one to believe she is not, in fact, quite an enthusiastic delusional thinker?
June 4, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
My friends,
Please "FOLLOW THE MONEY."
If your campaign had just effectively ended $20 million in debt, you too might adopt a strategy to squeeze a few bucks out of any/all of your backers who'd like to support you somehow as they mourn your loss. Hillary will concede as soon as she sees her campaign coffers breaking even, or believes that she has finally gotten the last drop of juice out of the turnip.
What she doesn't realize, publicly at least, is that any vetting of her as a VP prospect will also include vetting Big Dog, and that vetting will include this post-primary inflow of money. Obama is smart enough not to repeat how Mondale was done in by Ms. Ferraro's husband's connections and financial dealings. Big Dog's has too many bones buried...Obama will avoid the bone yard.
June 4, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
If I am going to sell my house my asking price is going to be above what I think I can get on an actual deal. Hillary's position is no difference by analogy.
OK, Hillary's beginning bargaining point is VP but that does not mean it is VP or nothing. It depends on what can be negotiated and there may be a deal or there may be not.
Looking into my fuzzy crystal ball I see (1) an offer in Obama's cabinet, mostly likely Health and Human Services, (2) help her pay off her campaign debts, and (3) first dibs on the next open Supreme Court seat.
Now mind you, that is not my preference (which is for her to return to the senate) but what my fuzzy crystal ball tells me. No, look as hard as I can, I don't see VP in there, but as I said, it's a fuzzy ball.
June 4, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Listen to Obama's speech last night. He seems to think Hillary will lead on the healthcare front in the future. Anyone think, Hillary might be good as the Secretary of Health and Human Services? She'd be much more effective and influential in this role as compared to the VP.
June 4, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
This guy is another of the, "Entitled Group," and needs to be discharged to the dumpster immediately. I threw him out with the trash the first time he impuned Sen. Obama and Sen. Obama's supporters would do well to remember those who were personally offensive during this campaign.
June 4, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's mentioned up thread, but Hillary Rosen's post is very much worth a read.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hilary-rosen/i-am-not-a-bargaining-chi_b_105133.html
June 4, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Make it happen.
June 4, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, she was working this a month ago? I thought she needed "time" to figure out what to do with her "18M votes". I'm glad Obama said no, I don't think the price is worth it to our country, and after last night, Hillary's rep is mud, she'll have to campaign for Obama like a banshee just to get back to even...
Don't most people in the running for VP say they are NOT interested? What a tool...
Don't go away mad, just go away.
June 4, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton's speech: Remarkable--what Jeff Toobin described as "deranged narcissism".
This speech--its very essence--was predicted on May 23rd:
Why Hillary should not be VP:
From "Head of State"
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/head-of-state-reasons-that-hillary.html
Friday, May 23, 2008
Head of State: The Reasons That Hillary Should Not Be Vice President
Regarding Hillary Clinton as Barack Obama's running mate:
Originally, this seemed to be a potentially plausible choice--and if presented in the following way, could turn her divisive campaign into a potential coup as a VP candidate. The thinking was the following:
Hillary has run a divisive campaign. Now, just as the nation should mend its divisions in favor a greater unity that would serve the greater needs of our country, so now they would explicitly put these divisions behind them, in the interests of the unity that this nation, after a bitter and divisive Administration, is so in need of. This would serve as a powerful and vibrant example of the very ability to unify that Obama both offers and represents.
However, this would require a candidate that was willing to take such a position of relative shared selflessness in the interests of a greater good. While the Vice Presidency certainly offers its honors (now far beyond the "warm pitcher" of John Vance Garner's famous phrase) and positioning for later Presidential aspirations, such a plan would require the ability to think in terms of a shared effort based on the betterment of the nation, rather than in more grasping, combative and singular terms.
The Clinton camp's behavior over this past week has made such a positive scenario clearly untenable, showcasing the same characteristics that have signified her campaign throughout its long, chaotic march--its contradictions of previous statements when such changes have a slight possibility of adding a week or two of vitality, its sudden and implausible use of populist guises and specious historical parallels for transparently opportunistic purposes, its near-hallucinogenic transmogrifications of personality and central bases for further continuation,
and the central campaign tendency to place personal attainment over virtually all values that lay in its path.
These characteristics--self over nation, positioning over a consistent presentation of position, values and even self, the willingness to put personal viability over the need to transcend and transform the vast wreckage of state and international relations that remains at this critical time--are as present now, at a moment when wisdom rather than a remorseless, obdurate desperation could fill this gap, as they have been throughout much of the campaign. They would continue to make themselves present during a Clinton campaign for vice president, complicating, diminishing and often distracting from, in trivial internecine battles, the message of unity and change.
Perhaps Clinton could adopt a more unifying, integrated and less grasping position on the VP subject. However, thus far, the actions of the Clinton camp have made it clear: It's time to clean the slate. Hillary Clinton should not be the Vice Presidential candidate.
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/head-of-state-reasons-that-hillary.html
June 4, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, it's a very interesting look at Clinton psychology and strategy. If she's decided a month ago she wants to aim for VP, you can look at everything that's happened since in that light. And the obvious strategy would be to show what a good running mate you would be, start hitting the crap out of McCain, make really strong statements that nullify any of the CIC-threshold stuff, and focus the campaign on rallying her supporters around Democratic issues.
But instead she chose to try to rile up her supporters, do this whole MI/FL thing, and try to force her way on.
June 4, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
This must come as a surprise to all the people who viewed Hillary as an hysterical woman out of touch with reality and living since February in a dream world of denial.
June 4, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bob Johnson is a joke.
And BET is a sweatshop.
June 4, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you people think HRC would use this clown to lead this effort you are more deluded than he is.
June 4, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary for VP? Maybe, but only if Rush isn't available.
June 4, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
HRC used all of her peeps. Feinstein and others came out with this non-starter yesterday a.m. It clearly had Clinton's imprimatur or her campaign would have slapped it all down.
I sure hope the post above, suggesting that we review ALL of her tactics in the last month as strategic positioning for the veep slot.
The RFK remark in this light?
Creepy shit.
June 4, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
She spent most of her life playing second fiddle to Bill. By 2000, she decided she'd had enough -- for good reason -- and would never again be second fiddle to anyone. I believe she is constitutionally incapable of being a VP and deep down in her heart, she has to know it.
June 4, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
When are you all going to get over your Hillary-hatred? This site and many of its supporters are so disgusting. Stop it. Half of the party supports this woman - this amazing, phenomenal woman. She received more votes from Democrats who voted in the primary. Many people admire and love her. Just stop it already!
June 4, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Clinton as Harold Stassen.
She's stuck in the old saw that "power is a muscle, and if you don't use it you'll lose it." She's not only going to stay in this race through the convention, she will continue to campaign through Barack's first term for 2012 and then 2016. She will become Harold Stassen.
Barack can't accept her as a VP. He has to keep going forward, being polite to her but not embracing her. Pretty soon her support will erode, as it has today.
Barack has to mount a campaign that beats Hillary at the convention and beats McCain after that. She's a nightmare, and she won't go away. Nothing he can do to affect that except move forward on his own.
June 4, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um - Johnson got into trouble for his derogatory comments about Obama. Doubt very much that Obama will pay him any mind. Johnson's a sleazebag of the highest order.
June 4, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
She wants a classic old style political no-win for Obama. She relishes the idea of hurting him with, he didn't offer to me out of respect or I made him see that I have muscle to force him ibto a co-presidency.....Obama is so smart and cool headed..he is forming a search committee and he is off to "Clinton country" to campaign for the general election. He will blow her off with his way of new politics. Have faith and confidence as Barack is now in charge.
June 4, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Troubling sign that maybe Obama is caving in on the VP choice: from wsj.com
---
Mr. Johnson is the former CEO of Fannie Mae who also oversaw the vice presidential vetting for John Kerry in 2004 and Walter Mondale in 1984. Holder was deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration and has been a senior legal adviser to Sen. Obama's campaign.
---
Mondale ended up caving in to angry feminists and picked, you know who, to be the VP in 84 and the ticket went down the drain.
I hope Caroline Kennedy, who is also on the VP search team, would inject some common sense into it.
June 4, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
They just vet, not select. I believe Mondale was pressured by party leaders to pick Ferraro.
June 4, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Running against Reagan? Mondale could have picked Jesus as his running-mate and lost. (ok, maybe that's a slight exaggeration)
I think they knew that, and that's why they decided to do the "first female Veep candidate"
June 4, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clarification: That Johnson is *not* Bob Johnson.
The full article here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121258746079045001.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news
June 4, 2008 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
8 years of a rogue Veep is enough. Does anybody seriously think that Big Dog Bill would stay out of the mix?
June 4, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Caroline Kennedy herself could well be a wise and prudent choice, both for the party and the country.
June 4, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mike 1981, thank you! ("When are you all going to get over your Hillary-hatred? This site and many of its supporters are so disgusting....")
I agree that Hillary's end game is--well, let's say "surreal", considering that Obama has WON THE NOMINATION and she really needs to drop out.
but you people on here who have this visceral hatred for her, who talk about "man pants" and "hags" and so on: how can you call yourselves good Democrats?
did you actually bother to LISTEN to Obama last nite? he doesn't want us to be divisive anymore. so why don't you just stop? I try to imagine what kind of people are writing this crap, and I guess I assume you're all about 22, with absolutely no clue about political campaigns ("has anybody ever advertised they wanted the VP spot before?" um, are you kidding? did you just become old enough to vote? honestly!)
and suggesting Caroline Kennedy would be a good vice president? are you SERIOUS? are you aware that she is not actually in politics? yes, I know her name is Kennedy and I know you guys dimly associate that name with politics. I mean really,what is the average IQ on this board? about 67?
I actually agree that Hillary wouldn't be good as VP for a number of reasons. but this woman has had an astounding career and yes, all you little girls out there who spew anonymous hate on these sites, she and others like her paved the way for YOU and if you don't understand that you're even stupider than you sound already.
let it go.
June 4, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink