Election Central Morning Roundup
NYT: Muslims Disaffected By Obama Campaign Tactics
The New York Times reports this morning that many Muslim voters are feeling disaffected by the Obama campaign's efforts to distance the candidate from the perception that is aligned with Muslim interests or is himself a Muslim. "A lot of us are waiting for him to say that there's nothing wrong with being a Muslim, by the way," said Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, the first Muslim elected to Congress and a very early endorser of Obama.
Both Candidates Go West To Talk About The Environment
Barack Obama will be in Las Vegas today for a campaign event discussing energy policy and green jobs, an effort to appeal to voters in this swing state by emphasizing environmental issues. John McCain will be in Santa Barbara to discuss environmental issues -- an interesting choice of venue, as the Los Angeles Times points out, given that this city is where candidates usually go to talk about how they oppose offshore drilling.
Clinton Campaign To Supporters: We Still Need Money
Hillary Clinton's defunct campaign yesterday sent out an e-mail to supporters, asking for money to help with the candidate's $20 million debt. "By helping us pay off our campaign debt, you're not just helping Hillary elect a Democratic president and grow our majority in Congress," the e-mail said. "You're making it possible for her to work as hard as she can on the issues we care about."
Dobson: Obama Distorting The Bible
James Dobson is clearly worried about Barack Obama's efforts to reach out to religious voters -- he's dedicated a section of today's pre-taped radio show to bashing Obama's arguments against directly applying biblical laws to public policy. "I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology," said Dobson.
Poll: GOP Senate Nominee Gets Anti-Bounce After Primary Victory
A new Rasmussen poll of New Mexico suggests that GOP nominee Steve Pearce's political stock has in fact gone down in the wake of his narrow primary victory. Pearce trails Democratic nominee Tom Udall 58%-30% for this open Republican-held seat -- worse than his showing before the primary, when he was behind 53%-37%.
McCain Campaign To Nevada Gov: Thanks, But No Thanks
This is fun. The McCain campaign has signaled that its not terribly enamored of scandal-plagued Nevada Governor Jim Gibbons, passing over him for the title of state campaign chair. This honorary job almost always goes to a party's governor, but will instead go to the lieutenant governor in this case.















Obama called the Muslim women personally, who were offended in Detroit. He also has stated previously that there is no problem being Muslim.
It is riDICulous that muslims are making an issue of this given the current homeland security atmosphere.
I have no problem with Muslims nor their religion however they just like all other Americans are aware of the heighten suspicious given 9/11 and need to adjust their expectations accordingly, when it comes to the Presidential campaign.
Ellison is a great guy, and he also knows that mainstream society is saying Obama swore in with the Koran, even though it was actually Ellison who did so.
Ellison needs to chill on this issue at this time.
Folks need to keep their eyes on the goal and not on these type distractions as the distractions can impede achieving the goal.
June 24, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is Obama's direct quote to the women in Detroit. Sounds pretty direct and should be more than sufficient.
After the incident in Detroit, Obama called the women. He told them, “I take deepest offense to and will continue to fight against discrimination against people of any religious group or background.”
June 24, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, certainly I can see why Obama would do those things but saying that muslims should "Chill" about the need for Obama to distance himself from them because of a bunch of (what they consider) misconceptions is a little ridiculous.
I don't think "Hey, lots of people in the country despise you, so just chill and be quiet while I insult you in order to win votes" is not a message that would resonate with many people. Would gay people take that kind of treatment? Would blacks, or Hispanics? Hell no.
June 24, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Delmoi
I said ELLison should chill, not muslims, firstly.
Secondly, Obama has not insulted muslims nor has he categorized them as unacceptable. HowEVER the mainstream society and press has...Obama is trying to become elected as president.
Having spoken out against religious discrimination is more than sufficient. Particularly, given the nations' atmosphere.
It is riDICulous for the muslim community to make an issue of something they KNOW is a fearmongering and smear tactic by the Fox news, Hillary Clinton and the GOP.
For them to highlight and exacerbate the issue is in no way supportive.
You are mistaken about what blacks, gays and hispanics have done in the political course of history. One thing is they know when they have a friend and supporter it is very unwise and especially non-productive for their issue to castigate a politician who has done nothing but be supportive to a far greater extent.
Furthermore, your examples on race and sexual orientation are not analogous to religion when Obama supports all three equally. More importantly, he has supported legislation that maintains religious as well as racial rights.
June 24, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ellison is my Congressman. He's terrific. The rare true liberal. I can count on him to vote as I'd like him to vote every time. Had I the luxury of choosing a candidate for President who represented my political views, he'd be a far better fit than Obama. Were I to choose a candidate based on religion I would not choose Ellison and I would not choose Obama or McCain or Hillary.
In 2004 I campaigned for several Democrats locally and for Kerry. The most inspiring experience I had in that campaign (actually the only inspiring experience I had in that campaign) was walking into the campaign headquarters of a young Jewish candidate to find Somali Muslim women at the phone bank.
For you to be telling Muslims it's their turn at the back of the bus, is revolting. If Obama can't be elected because he's black or because his father was a Muslim that would only show that the country has a long way to go in a more progressive direction. It would certainly not be an excuse to make another ethnic group the scapegoat.
June 24, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I did not tell anyone to go to the back of the bus.
My comment was that now is not the time to demand anything from Obama who, himself, has spoken out against religious discrimination and who has condemened fearmongering about the muslim religion.
I know Ellison as well he is from Detroit even though he now resides in MN. I have attended non-political social functions on several occasions.
I repeat...Keith needs to chill.
What Ellison and the Muslim community are doing is trying to leverage their votes, by making noise now and adding demands on Obama, unlike any other politician.
NO religious group of individuals has the right to make demands of politicians in this nation.
That is why we have separation of church and state.
If McCain is elected he will probably create internment camps for Muslims like we did for the Japanese during WWII, so the most prudent and wise course is for the Muslim community to recognize that Obama, himself, is not discriminating against them religiously.
Lastly, globally the Muslim community has created havoc in Europe ((France, Holland) as well as the USA (9/11) and the Middle East (ongoing)...so no one can be taken as telling them to sit in the back of the bus. Individuals of that faith should acknowledge that across several continents people of the Muslim faith have created civil disturbance and the issues surrounding their faith are not smears regarding their faith but rather a reasonable level of intolerance based on the actions of Muslims on more than one continent.
It is no different from Catholics having to accept that being an altar boy or priest creates reasonable doubt about just what type of relationship is occurring.
It is not discriminatory, anymoreso, than all Americans now having to go through airport screening due to 9/11.
June 25, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
i agree i go wayne state university in detroit and the muslims there do not hold obama responsible for what his volunteers did. and I live in the suburbs where nobody even cares about this issue so it really is a none issue that is couse by overly sensitive people or political opponents. And now they want obama to goto a mosque OMG if he did sean hannity would be all over this.
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/dwc-checklist-4-change-part-5-2/
June 24, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Muslims are making an issue of it. The NY Times article is somewhat misleading, in my opinion.
You can emphasize the quotes from Ellison, which would convey an idea consistent with the headline. Or, you can emphasize the quotes from Mr. Bray or Ms. Ghori, which convey a completely different point of view.
The Times is creating a mountain out of nothing.
June 24, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
This is simply the NY Times stirring up shit so they can say, "Hey look, we aren't liberal."
The Times has really gone downhill the past 8 years:
-Cheerleading Bush's run-up to war in Iraq.
-Hiring Bill Kristol as a columnist
-Hiring discredited Mike Freeman, a plagiaristic sports columnist.
June 24, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology," said Dobson.
Fucking hilarious.
June 24, 2008 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
and sad at the same time.
June 24, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe Dobson is on the record as saying that he wouldn't vote for McCain and that for 'the first time in his adult life, there was a chance that he wouldn't be voting for a President.' Of course, this was during the primary. This is step one of Dobson's walk-back to see his way clear to vote for McCain because the thought of the Muslim-loving Obama as POTUS will be just too (pass the smelling salts, I feel the vapors coming on) odious to bear.
Pretty damn predictable and pretty damn, well, odious.
June 24, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I almost choked on my coffee when I read about Dobson's complaint. But, then I realized that distorting the Bible is a patented operation by the fundamentalists, and violating their patent rights is serious. So, I say leave Bible distortion to the fundamentalists where it belongs.
Now, about the FISA compromise.......
June 24, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
But, then I realized that distorting the Bible is a patented operation by the fundamentalists,
You're too kind. "Distorting the Bible" is the whole point of the Bible in the first place: to be applicable to every situation by every person. Any mere reference to the Bible can be interpreted any way the reader wants, and it has always been this way. That there are actual different denominations devoted to the same exact book is proof of this.
June 24, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
What? Obama HAS said that there is nothing wrong with being Muslim and condemned the use of accusations of being Muslim in the pejorative. Maybe that guy needs to pay attention a little better.
And on the oil drilling thing:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/06/mccainbush-oil-scheme-pure-deception.html
June 24, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
The notion that Obama has to play a good guy, fulfilling every whim and fancy of every fucking Tom, Barak and Mohamed is outrageous. The fucking liberals need to realize that you don't diss the only candidate, who is on your side by making outrageous demands. With supporters like these, who needs enemies ? No wonder democrats keep losing the elections due to fucking knee-jerks.
June 24, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
That NY Times piece was kinda dumb, if you ask me. And the headline was a bit overdone, if you read the entire piece.
And with some odd descriptions:
Hmmm. "Swooning teenager"? "Dejection"?
So if someone gives you hope, the NY Times describes you as a swooning teenager. And if you sigh, you're dejected.
And this:
Doesn't this sort of contradict the whole premise of the article?
June 24, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
The article ignores the elephant in the room - a large segment of the nation's population are biased against Muslims. If they weren't, the "Obama is a Muslim" smear e-mail wouldn't be a smear.
June 24, 2008 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly, the REAL story with the whole thing is that some of his volunteers were so worried about Republicans exploiting bigotry and fear that they overreacted and told the women not to sit behind Obama in order to protect him. They didn't do it because they hate Muslims, they did it because they are afraid of the right-wing smear machine, and rightfully so. That is what our politics has come to, and the real story is that the GOP is committed to character assassination and exploiting prejudice and intolerance (and flat out lies) in order to smear a candidate because they can't win on the issues.
But does the media pick up on that? Nope.
But that is the real story, and the real discussion we should be having. A major political party in the United States is trying to demonize an ethnic minority. And no one in the media even bats an eyelash.
June 24, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
And instead you have this idiot Keith Ellison blaming this crap on Obama, when he could be railing against the GOP for their embrace of bigotry.
So ridiculous..
June 24, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
They released a statement about it to The New York Times:
At the rally for Senator Obama in Detroit on Monday, June 16, two volunteers denied us seating behind the stage the Senator would soon take. The volunteers informed us that we were not allowed to sit in that area due to the hijab, the headscarf that each of us was wearing.
This incident was unfortunate and extremely disappointing. Senator Obama has called us each to personally convey his deepest apologies and acknowledge that this was inexcusable. We both immensely appreciate the Senator’s phone call and his commitment to remedy this issue. We commend him for displaying qualities befitting an effective President. We acknowledge that this injustice has been taken seriously and that Senator Obama does not tolerate discrimination against Arabs, Muslims or any community. We are assured that he and his staff are committed to upholding the principles of justice for all peoples and bringing about change we can believe in. The infringement on our rights occurred and has been addressed; now we are ready to move forward. We will continue to support Senator Obama in his campaign and wish him the best as the race continues.
Regards,
Shimaa Abdelfadeel
Hebba Aref
Update: Mr. Obama’s released the following statement:
I reached out to Ms. Aref and Ms. Abdelfadeel this afternoon. I spoke with Ms. Abdelfadeel, and expressed my deepest apologies for the incident that occurred with volunteers at the event in Detroit. The actions of these volunteers were unacceptable and in no way reflect any policy of my campaign. I take deepest offense to and will continue to fight against discrimination against people of any religious group or background. Our campaign is about bringing people together, and I’m grateful that Ms. Abdelfadeel accepted our apology and I hope Ms. Aref and any who were offended accept my apology as well.
June 24, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a Christian, Obama is correct in correcting folks who claim he is not a Christian...I mean, if you were Jewish and somebody said you were Hindu, you'd correct them simply because, well, they were incorrect. But the constant denials from the Obama camp have always bothered me a bit because a) we don't have a religious test for office in this country and b) this being the case, even if he was a Muslim, who cares?
But the problem is that people do care. There are over a billion Muslims on this planet, if I'm not mistaken. Are they all evil terrorists? Hardly. But in this day and age, "Muslim" conjures up images of a scary brown guy in a turban or a scary black guy with a bow tie. It's the world's largest religion and has been around almost 1,500 years...yet somehow it's simply unacceptable to be Muslim and a politician in this country.
So the Obama camp has to do the things they do. Keeping veiled woman out of photo shoots is wrong and unacceptable, but you know the wingers would be plastering those photos all over their stupid blogs, sending out blast emails including the picture saying, "See! I told you!" He's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. And while American Muslims may hold some political power in certain parts of Michigan, overall, they just aren't an electoral force. As a result, they lose out, all in an effort to protect the insecurities, prejudices, and fears of folks who think every Muslim is out to blow up their kids' school. Sad...
June 24, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
this being the case, even if he was a Muslim, who cares?
I made this exact same argument to this crazy lady in sales when we were regrettably talking politics a few weeks ago. She lead off by saying, "I don't know if he's a Muslim or not," to which I replied, "He's not, but so what if he is? Who cares?" And she flatly replied, "I do. After what they did to us on 9/11, I'll never vote for a Muslim."
I ended the conversation right there.
June 24, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Small minds, little people. Like I said, sad...
June 24, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe you might want to ask her how she feels about voting for a Japanese candidate after that Pearl Harbor thing. I doubt that she'd understand the reference.
June 24, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
s/b Japanese American candidate
June 24, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pearl Harbor? That was when Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden attacked us, right? Or was it Hitler?
June 24, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Precisely! Ogiliberal...they are not keeping their eyes on the prize. I wonder if Muslims think McCain would hestitate to round them all up and put them in camps like we did the Japanese during WWII.
If the Muslim community thinks Obama's tolerance for all religions is unacceptable I can't imagine what they would think of McCains level of tolerance.
June 24, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign pushes back against the rumor every chance they get because it's not just "oh, he's just a guy who happens to practice Islam." The rumor is that he's secretly Muslim and that he's trying to deliberately deceive the American public so he can get into office and then wreak havoc on us (or something). When you consider how odious the rumor is, the Obama camp's response seems completely reasonable.
June 24, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
And that's the evil genius of the rumor. If he's a super secret Muslim, a Manchurian candidate, then of course he's not going to admit that he's a Muslim! So while I agree that they have to reiterate the fact that he is, in fact, a Christian, for the idiots out there who want to believe that he's the anti-Christ, all the denials in the world won't change a thing. I remember that interview with some Hillary supporter in WV. She mentioned the Muslim thing. The reporter said, "You know that he constantly says that he's a Christian?" She replied, "I know. He can say whatever he wants." The reporter than asked, "You don't believe him." The response was a short and simple and pathetic, "no". And this was a Democrat we're talking about here, a woman who actually sounded like she was pretty intelligent. Imagine what the wingnuts believe???
Then again, folks who believe these rumors - even for a minute - were never going to vote for Obama anyway. That he has a decent lead in the polls against super American hero McCain, even after months and months of these rumors being floated around, gives me hope that the wackjobs who believe this stuff are small in number.
June 24, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know after what Tim McVeigh and Eric Rudolph did to us, I'm never voting for a Christian.
June 24, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reply intended for hyperR above. Grrr.
June 24, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Or a white guy...
June 24, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. I'm never voting for a white male Christian again, thanks to Tim McVeigh. They obviously can't be trusted.
June 24, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
John McSame: the Last White Christian Man Left Standing
June 24, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
White Christian male who isn't consistent on what kind of Christian he actually is: Baptist, or Episcopalian?
Clearly, a dangerous individual.
Can't tell the difference between Sunni and Shia, or whether he's a Baptist or an Episcopalian.
June 24, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, since the Episcopals have affirmed a gay bishop, my guess is that he'll be falling back on Baptist, probably Southern Baptist at that.
June 24, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
And don't forget, two women tried to assassinate the president of the United States in 1975.
Now you know why I could never vote for Hillary Clinton.
June 24, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Dobson's point is that the Christian religion in this country has been more or less subsumed into the Republican Party, and as such, Democrats are interlopers who must be repelled.
June 24, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama said.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080624/D91G51AG0.html
WTF? Now the presidential campaign is going to be referendum on race and religion. The two subjects that divide and alienate people most. And he has single-handedly exacerbated that divide. It seems those two issues are his only past experience. He really has no experience on foreign policy, the economy, the environment. Between Wright and now this it is obvious that Obama is unfit for the presidency.
June 24, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your spam isn't any more interesting today than it was yesterday.
June 24, 2008 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ooooh, swing and a miss!
June 24, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't suppose you'll be using the gutter ball analogy too soon.
Were you the fat kid who's best friend was his MLB card collection?
June 24, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nah, never collected baseball cards. I did collect Mad Magazines though.
June 24, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The old ones are as relevant today as they ever were.
June 24, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think I understood half of the shit in those. I was like 9 years old when I first started buying them.
I used to have like hundreds in a drawer somewhere. They've probably been thrown out.
June 24, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah not cool dude. you sound like a angry HRC supporter or a republican with nothing else to do
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/dwc-checklist-4-change-part-5-2/
June 24, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone notice that Foghat changes avatars almost as often as his candidate changes positions on agents of intolerance (and offshore drilling and tax cuts and ...)?
June 24, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
And campaign financing . . .
June 24, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
And just who is my candidate?
June 24, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Way to not read the actual article, skippy.
June 24, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Only Dobson's distortions are permitted.
June 24, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
As someone who grew up in the Church, I was exposed to James Dobson about 15 years ago, at the age of 13. I laughed at his stupid ass then, and I am sad that he has grown to what he is today. Does he, or any of his followers, work on a Sunday? Does he know, or is he friends with, anyone who has ever had a divorce? Does he own any clothing made from more than one type of fabric (i.e. any clothing that is not "100% cotton")? Because, if so, he is violating the rules of the bible, all of which state the above are un-godly.
Seriously, James Dobson, what an asshole. Even Jesus would back us up on this one, I think.
June 24, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
At one time this country has railed against the Irish,the black and on and on and on.We are a country that is suppose to embrace every person of different faith and color.All this fear mongering against Muslim is wrong.There are bad people of every faith and color in this country.Look at the people who sit in the White House if you do not believe me!
June 24, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please exaplain to me, with facts, how that statement makes him unfit for the presidency. Random, stupid comments do not work on a website used by THINKING people, who demand more than just bluffery and empty rhetoric.
dickhead.
June 24, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, the above was addressed, and replied, to fogu2.
June 24, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwahahaha
Thinking people know how to use the reply.
Idiot.
June 24, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's a bit strange for American Muslims to take exception to Obama considering he's probably the best candidate for them, ever.
But people have a strange way of getting upset with the very people they really don't have any quarrel with and instead laying blame where it doesn't belong. Basically, American Muslims are cutting off their noses to spite their faces if they keep this up.
Goddamn - this is as close as they are likely to come any time soon to having someone in the White House who actually practices their religion - Obama at least has had a passing acquaintance with it.
It's unfair of them or anyone else to blame Obama for trying to dispel the constant rumors of his own religious affiliation, and I wish more people would be more sensitive to Obama's situation and less fucking concerned with their own all the time.
Because it's a mistake - he's the best thing they could hope for just like he's the best thing progressives here who aren't Muslims could hope for and the left is busily trying to fuck that up, too, over whether or not we can sue some corporations.
Some days I really wish I lived somewhere besides America.
June 24, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Name me another presidential candidate of the past who has such a vast backlog of religious and racial commentary.
Obama has singlehandedly made this about religion and race, the two subjects that divide people most. The laws of unintended consequences make the guy who claims to be a uniter the biggest divider in the history of presidential campaigns.
Perhaps you should move.
June 24, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's made it about the war and the economy, actually. That's what people are going to vote on. Thanks for playing, though.
June 24, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is the right wing repugs like you who have made this election about religion and race. Typical fucking Rovian tactic of accusing the opponent of exactly what you do. Go away, you paid troll.
June 24, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
If McCain rejects every Republican involved in a scandal . . . He will be less than Lieberman (the Party of one) . . .
Frankly, given Gibson's wife and financing issues makes him the perfect Vice President to highlight McCain's ability to make decissions. Heck! Can't ya all jus picture these two mavervicks against family values and legal financing riding to victory in JANUARY 2009?
June 24, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is anyone here interested in setting up a website to help Hillary to retire her debt and for Obama to get money for general election? Here is the idea: Hillary will need return money raised for GE to donors. Many of them may not other wise ready to contribute the returned fund to Obama but they can live without those returned fund, of course. Some Obama supporters who have never contributed to Hillary's primary compaign may be now ready to donate to Obama's GE compaign. So let's make a deal. For every dollar returned by Hillary to her donor which is subsequently contributed to Obama's GE fund, an Obama supporter will contribute the same amount to Hillary to retire her compaign debt. This is a win-win for everybody.
Deal or no deal?
June 24, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aimey May, that is actually a reasonable and civilly presented idea. Nice job.
June 24, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aimey May. Welcome back to reality. That's a reasonable, decent and novel proposal.
June 24, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amk- you are spot on. Absolutely right about every word you wrote.
Fogu2- Finally, someone has the BALLS to talk about religion and race and is not afraid of dealing with either subject as we should have dealt with aeons ago. No, he has not exacerbated anything. It is types like you and the media that are keeping this issue as a front burner and trying to ignite passions. As for him being unfit for the presidency, I think the person who was truly unfit for the "presidency" has been soundly defeated and is out with a begging bowl asking for money. The 109 million dollar woman wants OBAMA to pay off her debt!!!! Unfreakinbelievable!.
Aimey may_ Love your idea, but don't want to shell out a penny for that woman who could not even manage her own campaign finances and yet considered herself the ONLY VIABLE CIC candidate. Nope- she can afford to retire her own debt. Besides, she has her robot army of 18 million, if each of the them contributed a Dollar, she would be able to take care of a big chunk of it. Ummm- wonder where they are?? Yeah.....only crickets, I hear.
Bluebell- Keith Ellison scares me sometimes. It would behoove Obama to stay far away from him.
As a die hard supporter, I will say this that Obama has conceded the new cycle to Mccain who I am afraid is faring better than Obama. They need to do something quickly.
June 24, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Methinks Dr. Dobson doth project too much.
June 24, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology," said the Pope of Martin Luther. Protestantism is a movement whose very name suggests protest against Jesus's Church founded on Peter the rock and first Pope of the Holy Catholic faith. The traditional understanding of the Bible makes it very clear that the Catholic Church is Jesus's Church. However, the protesters insisted on their right to interpret the Word of God directly rather than through the proper lines of authority established by Christ Himself. From the Reformation it has been a long slow slide into postmodernism, decadence, and moral decline.
Wait. . . Isn't Dobson a Protestant?
June 24, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're the expert on that Mr. Dobson.
June 24, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
This jumped out at me from the Obama-Muslim article:
86 percent of 60,000 is 51,600 Muslims who voted overwhelmingly for Webb--that's over five times Webb's margin of victory (9,329). That means Muslim voters likely handed Webb Virginia, and the Democrats the Senate, in 2006. Amazing. I hope they're as effective in November, and that the Obama campaign pulls its head out.
June 24, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely fascinating, and very important.
June 24, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's my question.
What is Webb doing for the Muslim community...has he spoken in a mosque?
Or is he treating the Muslim community with a long-handled spoon?
Has Webb put out any statements condemning the fearmongering about Muslims particularly as relates to the Democratic nominee given his own 'personal/politic' experience with the Muslim community?
Or do you have to be a different skin tone in this country for the Muslim community to demand you speak out against religious discrimination?
June 25, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans getting in an uproar over Obama and Muslims is beyond hypocritical. I doubt Muslims would be interested in even attending a McCain rally--much less sit near him.
June 25, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink