Dem Party Leaders To Super-Dels: Decide This Week
So now that Obama has clinched the nomination and Hillary still hasn't conceded, what will party leaders do to end this thing?
From a statement just out from Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, and DGA Chairman Joe Manchin telling uncommitted super-dels to pick sides by the end of this week:
"We have come to the end of an exciting primary and caucus process -- the voters have spoken..."Democrats must now turn our full attention to the general election. To that end, we are urging all remaining uncommitted super delegates to make their decisions known by Friday of this week so that our party can stand united and begin our march toward reversing the eight years of failed Bush/McCain policies that have weakened our country."
There's nothing in it about the specific fact that Obama clinched and no hint as to what they think Hillary should do. If the party leaders are planning to exert any kind of public pressure on her to exit -- a delicate task, and perhaps something they'd prefer to do privately -- they certainly haven't done so yet.
Full statement after the jump.
"We have come to the end of an exciting primary and caucus process -- the voters have spoken. As the Democratic leaders of the Senate, House of Representatives, the Governors and the Democratic National Committee we commend all of the participants of the 2008 primary process, especially Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, for making this such a transformational election. Because of the enthusiasm our candidates have inspired, our party has brought record numbers of voters to the polls, gained millions of newly registered Democrats and now has advantages in states many thought were difficult to win. We are grateful to the millions of Independents and Republicans who have crossed over to vote for a Democratic candidate for President."Democrats must now turn our full attention to the general election. To that end, we are urging all remaining uncommitted super delegates to make their decisions known by Friday of this week so that our party can stand united and begin our march toward reversing the eight years of failed Bush/McCain policies that have weakened our country.
"We once again congratulate all of the candidates for their leadership and dedication to providing this country with a New Direction. We look forward to working with them and with all Democrats to win the White House, congressional seats and state capitals so we can deliver the change the American people deserve and demand."

Why is everyone in the Democratic leadership doing a stately minuette around a pile of bullshit?
She lost! If she is holding her "you-go-girl" coalition hostage for some concession she should be on the receiving end of a Party leader led re-education lecture on what's good for the Democratic party in the general election, and help her supporters accept the reality of her loss.
Obama would be doing that if the tables were turned.
Correction: Obama wouldn't have dragged on the drama this far to begin with. That's the Clinton dramatic flair to the race.
June 4, 2008 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
"a stately minuette around a pile of bullshit?"
Poetry. Nice.
June 4, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pressure should be applied in private. Hillary ran an aggressive race, she's a much more powerful national figure than she was two years ago, and she should be treated with respect.
I'm not sure what possible leverage could be applied in public that wouldn't do more harm than good. We can't even take away Lieberman's committee and sub-committee chairmanships!
She'll have to step off the stage soon enough - let her decide exactly how and when. The Obama campaign will proceed, regardless.
June 4, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is now crunch time.
June 4, 2008 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I expect we'll see the last of the SDs come out over the next day or two. I can't imagine what possible motivation there is left for not supporting someone at this time.
June 4, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Bock, bock, bock. Someone in my constituency will get mad no matter what I do! Bock, bock. Bock, bock, cluck, cluck, cluck, Ba-kawk! He's already got the nomination so my vote means nothing, anyway. Bock, bock, bock. So why should I stick my neck out? Bock, bock, bock. What's in it for me? Bock, bock, bock, Ba-kawk!"
Any other questions?
June 4, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Hey, the people who won't endorse are telling us to endorse. We'd better get on that."
June 4, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
lol. Good point.
June 4, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is Democratic leadership. Out of executive power for 8 years, and after a bruising loss in 2000, a dissolute and leaderless party believes it deserves to inherent the WH on a platform of change. Note HRC's hubris in this respect. There are of course Dem icons who can be identified as party leaders, but no one of them has stepped up to leverage his political capital for the good of the party to effect a change in its direction. That is, in the direction of unity and sound decision-making. That's how you get the debacle of FL and MI. Thus no kingmakers to edge HRC out of the race. Obama is in the sad position of declaring himself the nominee, without the party elders having the guts to second his response on national TV. Sad to watch.
June 4, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Leadership's an issue, I agree. This situation is also thorny because Hillary's been effective at framing herself as the victim of some massive conspiracy to silence her. If there's even the slightest perception that someone's "forcing" her out, she and her supporters will go ape.
June 4, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's so true, LovelyNina. Great comment.
June 4, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem isn't Democratic leadership... the problem is that there isn't any!
June 4, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is sad. Obama had to declare himself the winner.
June 4, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
We had better see both Pelosi and Dean come out and declare today. And then I would expect to bulk of those who remain to follow during the remainder of the week. Those who choose not to after will be irrelevant. But, yes, for Pelosi and Dean not to have taken a Leadership position before now is unforgiveable. If they can't stand up today and state their support for the Party's nominee, they don't belong in their positions.
June 4, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS A STUPID MEMO.
Obama already has the number. Party leaders simply have to put their seal of approval. And this is one reason I reject Jim Webb as VP - he couldn't stand up, take the risk and endorse Obama.
June 4, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who has not yet endorsed has strategically marginalized their influence.
June 4, 2008 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Hillary campaign is a boil on the butt of the Democratic Party!
Lance it!!!!!!!!
June 4, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
They continue to try to sooth the ego of outgoing Hillary Clinton at the detriment of their Party's nominee. What a disgrace!
June 4, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll be curious as to how the remaining Supers endorse and how it will be covered by the media. As Ben Smith wrote about yesterday, there are likely several Southern democrats seeking reelection that won't necessarily want to be associated with Senator Obama. There is no requirement to endorse before the convention, and I presume they can even vote "present" or abstain from cast the Superdelegate vote at the convention.
Certainly over the next day or so all remaining who intend to endorse will do so, then Nancy, Harry, and company need to endorse themselves and move this to the next stage if it isn't there on its own by then.
June 4, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
You mean, the associations that worked so well for the GOP in Mississippi recently?
The Politico is a rightwing propaganda outfit.
Take what they say with a grain of salt.
June 4, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Southern Democrats don't want to be associated with Obama? Honorless cowards!
June 4, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton has overstayed her welcome; whatever her goals are she lost, all would be better served if she simply got off the stage.
June 4, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we're going to need to sell a few more bikes to get rid of her.
June 4, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
The latest NEW RULE from Shrillary's campaign - Terry was just on MSNBC explaining that PLEDGED delegates are open game for being persuaded to switch from one candidate to another.
WOW, there they go again - the crusader for every vote counting now attempting to reverse the "will of the people" in a vain effort to steal the nomination from Obama!
It's going to be a long summer with these Shrillary campaign clowns!
June 4, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome! They should totally press that argument. Because every time they do, we get her candidates switching to Obama.
June 4, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who cares?
Obama doesn't have to wait for baggy old Harry Reid and the rest of the bumbling Dem old guard to give him any kind of go-ahead. Fuck them. He's clinched it. As a poet once said...
Your old road is
Rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.
As for Senator Clinton, it doesn't matter. Her influence is fading by the second.
June 4, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Robert Zimmerman is a great American!
June 4, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Her campaign can still persuade superdels to come to Hillary - unforunately, that's the downturn of the DNC rules. She has all summer to either wait for something bad to happen OR sit on the phone with the superdels and persuade them to switch from him to her.
Obama is not officially the nominee until the convention.
Believe me, I'm an Obama supporter all the way, but the above states the actual DNC rules. Rather pathetic, but I won't stop biting my nails until August.
June 4, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Friday?!?!?!
No acknowledgement of the presumptive nominee?!?!?
No leading by example with their own declarations?!?!?!
Listing Hillary's name first?!?!?!
We have truly inspirational leaders in our party!!
Not!
June 4, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
And why is the MSM not paying any attention to what Howard Fineman said about a backdoor deal being discussed with Obama and Clinton campaigns - that Obama will offer Clinton the VP spot ONLY if she turns it down.
They talked about this before McCain's speech last night, but then nothing else was said. He said he had THREE sources within HER campaign and two from his stating this as what is really happening behind the scenes.
Has anyone heard anything?
June 4, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Too much drama! I think Obama will simply not pay much attention to her; I suspect a basic issue is her role at the convention. HRC need get over the notion that she is owed something; yes, she deserves a role but that does not mean she has any power to dictate to anyone. At this point she has become a right wing talking point to be used against Obama by Republicans;i.e., he can't close the deal, but the reality is HRC feel the need to undo her loss.
June 4, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Leave it to Hillary and her campaign to move the talking points of the day from the sublime to the ridiculous.
The Clintons are hopeless. No to VP. No to Supreme Court (she hasn't made a decent judgement that I have witnessed EVER) and NO to anything but the Senate. Let her learn from Ted Kennedy's experience and actually work to get something done legislatively instead of carping on about her great record.
June 4, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I predict the latest will be that the superdelegates were under duress and therefore didn't make their pledges in good conscience. They need time to think about this and decide who they really support. Obama bullied them into endorsements that they wouldn't otherwise make.
These folks don't give a rats' ass about unifying the party -- unless it involves them at the top of the ticket.
June 4, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thing would be so much easier if it wasn't for the 18 million supporters she's going to hold hostage all summer - she's using these folks like a flak jacket to protect herself from those demanding she drop out. She's USING these people for her own power crusade ane they actually think she's doing it for them!
They actually believe this!
June 4, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Only a small percentage of those people, couple thousand or maybe 10 thousand or so. Look at how many showed up in dc. If thousands showed, I would have been semi worried. They didn't break 500. The rest of the clintons' voters know the game is over and have already drifted to obama. Just look at cali, obama would win it hands down today against clintons.
I really think obama needs to ignore the clintons and their nonsense. The more he ignores them, the more meaningless they are. She is using the empty threat of the people who voted for her to threaten to damage dems and the dem party. It's called blackmail. Well, I say f*ck em.
One other thing, alot of these people voted for the clinton brand. It had not one gd thing to do with her or her "stellar" campaign. It was just name recognition and people wanting to go back to the 90's. Basically, they were voting for mr. bill. The whole clinton drama is really disgusting.
June 4, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a reply to Micheal A.
I hadn't seen the figures on how many showed up for the Rules Committee meeting. Was it really only 500? I thought 1,000s were supposed to be there. I agree that the McCain voting Clintonites are a small percentage of her supporters. They are just very very vocal and it makes them seem like a lot. I think dealing with Sentor Clinton et al is like getting the alcoholic uncle out of the wedding party. Do you try to stop him before he starts? Can you control the amount he drinks? You have to invite him. So maybe if you just let him get so drunk he passes out at least he is shut up. But until he passes out what is going to say?
I don't think Sentor Clinton can damage Obama that much. But I do think she can continue to ruin her 2012 chances. That would be a good thing.
June 4, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was watching all day saturday. Some news outlets said about 500, others said a couple of hundred. None said anything close to 1000 or a couple of thousand. They are just very vocal, not a huge number. And actually, I don't think that the clintons can say anything that would change the minds of the few thousand around the country that wouldn't vote for obama in any event.
June 4, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
And imagine if the Obama camp had asked supporters to come to DC, instead of asking them to go register voters in Arlington, VA instead! He would have had tens of thousands!
June 4, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bluesplashy, that is seriously the best (and funniest) analogy I have heard yet. Drunken uncle! :)
June 4, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just don't understand her point behind all of this. 18 million won't support him if they make her drop out. She wants to steal the nomination from Obama at the convention, which would then make 18 million if HIS supporters crusade/vote against her.
Either way, things balance out to ZERO for her.
What are her reasons for staying in past this week?????
June 4, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinical Narcissism. Look it up on the net. She is living in a fantasy land dodging sniper fire in bosnia and still believing that she will be sworn in as president.
June 4, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Misleading argument, it was never all or none for either candidate. It will take fifty million plus to win the election, Obama and Clinton combined received about 35 or 36 million. For a variety of reasons either candidate will experience some slippage but the bulk of the tradition groups can be expected to vote as in the past. Th larger problem is disruption in one form or another between now and the convention.
June 4, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
She'll turn herself into Mike Huckabee soon enough.
June 4, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Morning peeps - how happy is everyone?
Nevermind the Duchess - everyone is talking about Barack Obama, the next president of the United States.
June 4, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hungover!
But happy!!
Damned happy!
June 4, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
More on the Howard Fineman thing I mentioned above - not much, but it's something. Does anyone else know more about this possible deal?
http://www.americablog.com/2008/06/clinton-campaign-hillarys-not-gonna.html
June 4, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Tena!
Just wishing Obama was all everyone was talking about - we're also dealing with the drama queen herself and her 18 million court jesters.
June 4, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
O I know, but damn I'm happy.
She's sure a crusader for women's rights - "don't you dare offer it to another woman."
fuck you, queenie. LOL!
June 4, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
We are not Republicans. We do not walk in lockstep or wear jack-boot (outside of sexual foreplay). Unbridled power over the masses is not our sole purpose. Our altars are not littered with money.
We are Democrats. We call for and speak to diversity. We seek to incorporate the discordent. Rules and law are important to us. We worship at many alter or none. We believe and crave purality.
The last thrity years of Republican rule have fundementally damaged America and Americans. Every school child used to be able to recite history . . . Now it untaught.
Hillary Clinton is a bad actor. Hilary Clinton seeks her personal advancement over Party and National good. Hillary Clinton's actions could shatter the Party permanently.
There is real reasons to avoid doing this. We are not like the Republicans when Teddy Roosevelt shrived off the Bull Moose Party.
Hillary Clinton is not Teddy Roosevelt and we are not Repbublicans.
Grow up and put on your big boy and girl panties. Hate and anger are Hillary Clinton's methods and games. Be better than that bullshit.
June 4, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Empty words and excuses for failure in the form of "hope" are Obama's methods.
I prefer progress.
June 4, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
if they don't want to endorse obama, can they pick gravel?
June 4, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Calm down everybody. It's over! Hillary lost! If Obama and his supporters (myself included) need to perform a little bit of kabuki theater which allows Clinton and her supporters to save face, then so be it. I'm not especially fond of the idea, but I'm even less fond of President McCain. In his victory speech last night Obama showed he truly has class. Some Clinton supporters may be sore losers, but we need to show that we are gracious winners - and I say this as someone who's written his fair share of anti-Hillary diatribes.
To recap: IT'S OVER. WE WON!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 4, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wish this were true! But the fact is that until she drops out, or until the Democratic convention nominates Obama, Hillary is still running for President. I don't know how, but she is.
June 4, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I completely understand your apprehension (and I do believe Hillary is going to play hardball and try to extract as many concessions from Obama as possible), this race officially ended the minute Clinton indicated she wants to be VP. Saying you want to be VP is a tacit admission you cannot be President. Why do you think contenders ALWAYS deny they are interested in being veep while still running?
Again, I completely understand everybody's fears (and I still hold them myself), but I think we need to move on from bashing Hillary. The longer we focus on her, the less we focus on trouncing Senator McDouche in the fall.
June 4, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please.....stop it.
June 4, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the problem with the silly pre-agreed gambit of him offering her the VP but her refusing it:
She'll wear a wire. When he offers her the VP, instead of her refusing the post as scripted, she'll use a recording of the offer to bully him, blackmail him, and/or humiliate him. ("He tried to deceive me and 18 million voters!")
What can OHB do to present this mischief? Not make the offer is all I can realistically imagine.
June 4, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have got to stop posting form my Treo. I'm sorry about the typos and misspellings above . . .
Please forgive me.
June 4, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have got to stop posting form my Treo. I'm sorry about the typos and misspellings above . . .
Please forgive me.
June 4, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena,
I totally agree that Obama had better pick who he wants with no constraints, but there is a gnawing part of me that agrees that if he picks another woman as the VP, her supporters will instantly not vote or go to McCain - and chances are McCain will eventually pick a female running mate as well.
Of course, that's the paranoid part of me.
June 4, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena,
I totally agree that Obama had better pick who he wants with no constraints, but there is a gnawing part of me that agrees that if he picks another woman as the VP, her supporters will instantly not vote or go to McCain - and chances are McCain will eventually pick a female running mate as well.
Of course, that's the paranoid part of me.
June 4, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink