« WaPo's Richard Cohen: McCain's Flip-Flops Matter Less Than Obama's Because McCain Was POW | Home | Bill Clinton Endorses Obama »
Bill Clinton Endorses Obama
Bill Clinton's office, responding to lots of chatter in political circles about why he hasn't yet endorsed Barack Obama, releases a terse statement:
"President Clinton is obviously committed to doing whatever he can and is asked to do to ensure Senator Obama is the next President of the United States."
It's not exactly an appearance with Obama at a rally in Unity, New Hampshire -- but it's an endorsement nonetheless.
Advertisement

Comments (106)
To paraphrase Frank Zappa: I can't wait 'til Bill's 'fro is full-grown.
June 24, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
To quote FZ:
... And god bless the mind/ of the man in the street.
June 24, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does "Bobby Brown" pop into my head when jointly pondering Zappa and Clinton?!
June 24, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL! That's the first Frank tune that popped into my mind too (but I was afraid to post it).
June 24, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. I never heard this song til now. It's hilarious.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8y0JLPQl94
June 24, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zappa on CNN Crossfire in 1986 (with Bob Novak and some other schlubs):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ISil7IHzxc&
June 24, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, this won't stop the chattering classes from chattering about the rift in the Democratic Party.
You ever realize how stupid political punditry has gotten? McCain's flip-flops are to be trusted, but flat statements about support are going to be dissected to the nth degree?
Greg, are you ever going to bring back Horse's Mouth? I miss it.
June 24, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Greg, Horse's Mouth, bring it back. I miss it too.
June 24, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will anyone ask Clinton's office what makes his support so "obvious". Hasn't been obvious to me...
-- ARG
June 24, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
has not been obvious to me either. Perhaps it was masked by all teh terse flying through the air...
June 24, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
forgive me, but i'm skeptical.
After the disgusting campagin the clintons ran, its very hard for me to believe any thing that either one of them says. In fact, i give them only slightly more credibility than republicans.
OH, and why, when he was asked about this yesterday, did Bill Clinton NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION?
June 24, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we please stop talking about the Clintons?
June 24, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
the media refuses to stop talking about the Clintons because the big secret is there is no competition between McCain and Obama. NONE. Remember all those weak spots Obama has? Turns out they're not so weak and McCain's strengths aren't so strong.
June 24, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice of him to force that past his tightly clenched teeth! LOL
I really do understand how he feels so I'm not surprised he didn't haul out all his Big Dawg charm and lay it on for Obama. I'm sure he hates his guts right now. It's only natural.
June 24, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, it is like he was reading these comments on the Clintons for the last few months, or something!
June 24, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jealousy really is such an ugly emotion, isn't it? :)
(Misplaced this downthread, by accident).
June 24, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have had a feeling for some time that the Hillary/Obama "riff" isn't nearly as personal or serious as the Bill/Obama split. Bill is only 60 or so years old. His health seems good. I don't think he is ready to become an elder statesman. Obama is a bigger threat to his personal ego than anybody wants to admit. If Obama is elected Bill stands to lose his position as Democratic "top dog." That means a lot to Bill's self image.
June 24, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you just totally nailed it.
June 24, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Eleanor Clift explains why the stakes are much higher for Bill Clinton than for his wife:
June 24, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um...that's not an endorsement? It was a staffer saying Bill will help Obama, it wasn't Bill saying it, and it wasn't an endorsement. Not even close to any endorsement.
Not that it matters, Bill made a complete fool out of himself and tarnished his reputation. Obama is better off without him.
June 24, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree w/ your post that Obama is really better off w/out Bubba's "big" endorsement or him on the trail w/ Barack. Let Bubba get a big appluase at the DNC and be done w/ it.
June 24, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree with both of you. I think that the image of Obama and Bill Clinton campaigning together would be very powerful.
June 24, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
At one time I would have agreed, CT. But to judge by his performance campaigning for his wife, I think now he's just not the same person that would have made that powerful statement.
And I find that very sad.
June 24, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG Yes - much better off. The last thing Obama needs is Bill Clinton on the campaign trail.
June 24, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hah! We posted the opposite comment at the same time!
June 24, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know and it just keeps getting sillier - LOLOL!
Or maybe I just keep getting sillier - I'm in a silly mood.
June 24, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be the Non-Endorsement endorsement.
June 24, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Bill's commitment wasn't even to "help" Obama.
It was to do "whatever he can and is asked to do."
In other words, Bill isn't going to be out there proactively stumping and pressing the flesh for the Democratic nominee.
Maybe if Obama asks him to do something specific and he's free that particular day ...
As RonByers suggests, Bill may well be taking Hillary's defeat more personally than she is.
She and Obama may dislike each other a lot, but Hillary remains an active politician who needs to play nice with the Democratic Party's new powers-that-be.
Their joint event in Unity should tell us how enthusiastic a team player she plans to be.
It sounds, however, like Bill is going to sulk.
June 24, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right. It's NOT an endorsement.
It shouldn't be labeled as such.
June 24, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody cares. And that's what bothers Bill the most.
June 24, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a misleading headline. A statement issued by his office is very different from a formal public appearence in support. If this is an endorsement, probably it's an endorsement of reluctance to support.
June 24, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the key phrase in the statement is "is asked to do," which intimates to me that they've had no discussion of any role to date.
Which is, incidentally, fine by me as Bill has shown an uncanny lack of ability to keep his fly up and/or his mouth shut.
June 24, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
He was an excellent campaigner for John Kerry IMHO . . . okay so it didn't work out, but still . . .
June 24, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take back your snark comments. The FPOTUS compaigned for Kerry coming of open heart surgery. Even Chelsea compainged hard for this ungrateful horse face from MA. I wonder why the heck I ever contributed to that despicable man's presidential compaign.
June 24, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gee whiz, aren't you a psychopath!
June 24, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope he won't go PUMA on us.
June 24, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Best political endorsement since Edward V's head, neatly nicked off just seconds before, said of its uncle, Richard (Part III) in a bitter concession: "I think he'll make a cracking good king!"
June 24, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
June 24, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
This comment deserves a prize.
June 24, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
A $300 million prize?
June 24, 2008 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it me or is Bill Clinton a big baby?
June 24, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! What a powerful endorsement. Makes me misty-eyed and want to break out in song.
All together now:
"I can fly higher than an eagle,
"When you are the wind beneath my wings."
June 24, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what we need Bill to do:
Go home and shut up.
June 24, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
He'll probably be be stalking around Unity this weekend, incognito, selling hot dogs or hats or something. How can he stand to keep away. I think Michelle is going there. He's so left out.
June 24, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you were Bill Cliton and you were described as the first black President by somebody, now you got implied as a racist by an opponent's camp in the primary. Your wife just lost to an empty-suit because of stupid process and rule and media's fascination with an untested young fellow who were debating highway toll two years ago. How would you feel? do you think he should volunteer to go to compaign without being asked?
Nobama, at this stage, still accused of the Clinton compaign implying his a muslim. How slimy a figure he is! He wants people to get over it? No way, Barry! We are PUMA.
Let's make it clear: a vote for McCain is a safe vote. With Democrats expected to increase majority in the Congress, he can do no harm unilaterally. Iraq is succeeding and he can manage that much better than Nobama. Woman's choice is not under threat. Even if McCain appoints justice overturn the rights, they merely go back to the states. Very few changes will be there to limit abortions. If there are more restrictions, on the other hand, there may not be as many unprepared pregnacy anyway. Damn it, you have RU486, you have condoms. Why do you need an abortion?
In terms of economics, McCain will be a much beter President. Raising capital gain tax and income tax, at this time or age, will kill this fragile economy.
For the people want to have a Democratic congress, you should want McCain to succeed. If the Democrats have total control of the government, you don't know how much damages they are capable of doing to our country. Just look at early days of Bush admin.
Repeat after me - gridlock is good!!!
June 24, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Voting McCain? Good luck to you.
June 24, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
You bet, sweetie.
June 24, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
What happened to "let's help each other with debts and donors," Aimey May? Your faux conciliatory spirit certainly faded pretty quick. Or should I say flip flopped . . .
June 24, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I have no interest of helping Obama with GE. I just want to find ways to retire Hillary's debt. That's it. Next time, I will set up a vote-trading exchange for Barr supporters. We McCain supporters in New York will vote for Barr if his supporters in PA or MI vote for McCain.
McCain, steady hand and proven experience for time of peril!
--- was posted under the incorrect message before.
June 24, 2008 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, good luck with that.
If my candidate lost, I would just move on and get a life, but if quixotic gestures of delusional self-importance are what get you off, I only wish the best for you.
June 24, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Nobama" - wow, you're so witty.
Can we just attack politicians by pointing out the issues which we disagree with them about and the actions they take that we take exception to? This juvenile act of tweaking their name is just silly and reminds me of schoolyard taunting that most of us grew out of in third grade.
This goes for those of you using "McSame" for McCain too.
Can we all just try to act like adults, even if our leaders don't?
June 24, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
People like Aimee May have serious psychological issues.
They're like LaRouchies and 9/11-truthers. They enjoy the thrill of thinking they're these all-important warriors in a grand conspiracy to which only they are privey.
It's a sad spectacle, and it makes me wish this web site had an 'Ignore' feature.
June 24, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody cares. You are irrelevant.
Obama will be president regardless of the delusions of internet conspiracy theorists.
June 24, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Considering all the states that have tried to circumvent abortion rights even with Roe v. Wade in place, you have a drastically rosy view on what life would be like if it were overturned. It's fine if you don't truly care about reproductive rights, which it doesn't seem you do, but please don't for a minute think a suggestion, in this forum, that McCain is a safe vote will get anything more than a a snort of ridicule. A vote for McCain is a vote for more Bush policy, not just on women's bodies, but on the economy, foreign policy and campaign finance "reform".
June 24, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg--
Can you report who Bill is currently boffing? I thought the Nat'l Enquirer piece on his Chappaqua mistress was quite good, if a bit salacious.
I'm thinking that now that he doesn't have to be a good boy, with wifey out of the race and all, the fellow is surely gorging on sticky ribs and rib-tickling tarts of the Burkle variety.
June 24, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, send Bill down to Arkansas, Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee.
Since all four are solid for McCain, he probably can't hurt Obama in any of those states.
June 24, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I have no interest of helping Obama with GE. I just want to find ways to retire Hillary's debt. That's it. Next time, I will set up a vote-trading exchange for Barr supporters. We McCain supporters in New York will vote for Barr if his supporters in PA or MI vote for McCain.
McCain, steady hand and proven experience for time of peril!
June 24, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
This has to be snark. Has to be. It's so freaking over the top.
June 24, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's not snarking.
Just a Bitter Troll trying to rile up the board.
"Calling pinkystab, clean-up on aisle 4."
June 24, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Obviously committed to doing" is not the same as "will do."
The Clintons are pulling their punches re supporting Obama, and are keeping the party divided, in the process.
Exhibit B: It's been two and a half weeks since Hillary's valedictory speech in Washington, and still a giant "Hillary for President" logo blares from the top of her Web site.
Hillary for President?!! Could there be a more spiteful and petulant message to be shoving down the throats of all those 18 million glass-crackers she keeps telling to go to her site and bail her out of debt?
Peter Daou could switch out a "sans 'for President'" version of that logo in 5 minutes. But he hasn't. And my guess is that Hillary hasn't asked him to.
Unity, schmunity.
June 24, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You moron, she is officially still a candidate for President. She suspended her compaign and not terminated her compaign. If someone found Nobama is boning Scharlett Johnanson, she could still be the nominee and become the President. You want her to come to my living room and take down my "Hillary for President" sign as well?
June 24, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I'm voting for Obama twice if I find out he's doing both Michelle and Scarlett.
And if he's doing them simultaneously, I will be a veritable precinct unto myself!!
/snark
June 24, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
talk about the audacity of hope!
/metasnark
June 24, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
You miss my point.
"Suspend" is between Hillary Clinton and the FEC. But for all practical and public intents and purposes, she has ended her campaign.
Because Hillary has ended her campaign and no longer is making public stump appearances, no longer holding press avails, and no longer granting interviews as a candidate -- and because has she not held press avails or granted interviews in any other context -- her only real public means of communicating with those who supported her in the primary -- and, for that matter, with everyone else -- is via her campaign Web site and via emails to those who have signed on to her email list.
Those two places -- her Web site and her emails -- are where Hillary's public messaging lives now. And the messages she puts in those two places are crucial to Democrats' ability to unify and mobilize behind Barack Obama as the next President of the United States.
Those who supported Hillary in the primary are unlikely to support Obama for President unless and until it is unmistakably clear to them that she is supporting Obama for President.
My question: How is anyone supposed to believe that Hillary supports Obama for President, when her logo -- the central image on her Web site -- still is telling everyone that she is "for President"?
Did Hillary Clinton endorse Barack Obama or not?
June 24, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the welcome page to Hillary's website says nothing about hillary for president, but instead says support Obama for President, with a video of Hillary's real concession speech.
June 24, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look at the giant "Hillary for President" logo -- top left of every single page on her Web site.
June 24, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama should, and will, do everything in his power to "massage/maneuver and burnish/polish" Bill Clinton into the role of highly revered senior statesman in the party. It's a position Bill can hold for many years to come and I believe once he embraces it he'll he'll be masterful at it.
June 24, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Bill was heart and soul into Hillary becoming President. But, wasn't Bill Clinton's other baby the DLC? Obama's total embrace of the DNC affected the DLC's power going forward......so I can imagine that Bill Clinton is a tad upset that his whole circle of influence is reduced.
June 24, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha! Just caught this little item out of the corner of my eye. Bill is becoming rather a colorful figure. Tsk, tsk. He should really put more effort into being an upstanding guy. Being a former President and all...
June 24, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Eleanor Clift explainswhy the stakes are much higher for Bill Clinton than for his wife:
June 24, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jealousy really is such an ugly emotion, isn't it? :)
June 24, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
June 24, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha! Awesome retort! Big applause for Steve, friends. He'll be appearing all week. :)
June 24, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
finally. the next step is that they be able to speak to each other rather then writing letters to one another
http://www.sensico.wordpress.com
June 24, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
You guys are simply sick. You are so ready to trash the only two-term President of the Democratic Party since WWII on behalf of an unknown entity. Bill Clinton has done so much for the country and the party and he is still doing tremendous good deeds for the world since he left the office. How can you be so sure that Nobama will do better than Clinton? he has his human flaws but he does not deserve to be belittled by lunactics like you!
Tell me what your love boy has done so far in his life to better this country, this society, and this world. He may have the potential but do you have to debase Clinton to get him there?
June 24, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've just been able to confirm that Aimey May's real name is Gennifer Flowers.
June 24, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill debased himself... now we're just talking about it.
June 24, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, why don't you start the First Church of Bill & Hillary Clinton, since you hold them in such reverence. Be sure to document all those miraculous moments; Bill Parting the Red Sea with his cigar, the pardoning of all those sinners, the Rise of the Fourth Reich on his watch, dropping multiple (78?) peace-missiles on 'terrorist targets' (milk-formula factories included) on the eve of his impending impeachment, redefining the word "is", just to name a few. All very impressive.
June 24, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
To be honest with you, my admiration of the Clintons is because what they are and what they have done for my party and my country. My admiration is based on reality. Yours for Obama, on the other hand, is based on hope and on wishful thinking. Obama has not done a thing yet! For you to trash someone who has accomplished a lot to push up someone who may accomplish nothing is simply unjustifiable.
If Nobama somehow steal the general election as well and proves to be a transforming figure that accomplishes more than Bill did, I will accept I'm wrong in the future. The likelihood of that happening? Nil!
June 24, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Leave Britney alone!!
June 24, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
June 24, 2008 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just noticed the "loveboy" reference about Obama. That's rich, coming from a defense-of-Bill-Clinton post.
June 24, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Terse?
The Obama camp probably asked him to keep any remarks under 30 words.
The less we see/hear of Bill, the better.
June 24, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear!
June 24, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a Libertarian, watching the Democratic party characteristically tear itself apart and find ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory (once again) is almost entertaining, except the prospect of another four years of Republican rule is too terrifying. Please people, quit the bickering and put your damn party back together. I'll even vote for your candidate. (Not like I could stand voting for Barr.)
I can just see it now, January 2009, McCain settling into the Oval Office, and Democrats still arguing about who really won Michigan and Florida in the primaries and whether those delegates should have counted.
I'm begging you. Get it together. We have fascists to fight.
June 24, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is so laughable. You are a libertarian and you want a Marxist to take over the government and the country ruled by one party. If you are a real libertarian, I'm a virgin!
June 24, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Republicans have lost the right to govern in my opinion. I read their 2004 platform.
June 24, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Marxist?
Oh dear, you just gave yourself away. How many McCain points are you angling for?
June 24, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
They must be paying her by the post.
Empty-headed doesn't even begin to describe her "thoughts."
June 24, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, a lot of libertarians are backing Obama. Read up on the "paternalistic libertarianism" of some of his U. of Chicago mentors.
June 24, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Libertarian Party is pretty diverse. Our tent includes everyone from religious conservatives (who want to make abortion a state's rights issue, for example) to social liberals who are typically more fiscally conservative than most Democrats. I fall in the latter category. I just don't think it is the place of government to fix everything and build a utopian society for us. Not that I think building a utopian society is bad, but I don't like the idea of depending on the government for that. Reliance on the government results in subservience to the government. We have other means of working together as a society. But this isn't the place for that debate.
Aimee, if you think Obama is a Marxist, you seriously should read a civics book and learn more about the terms you are throwing around. I'd also suggest you compare the platforms of Clinton and Obama in detail. If you supported Clinton, Obama's views are FAR more similar to hers than John McCain's. Voting for McCain because Clinton didn't win is childish IMHO. That comes from the same place as the petty schoolyard "Nobama" moniker.
I have serious disagreements with some of Obama's ideas. I've actually read through much of his proposals and I would like to see less emphasis on new government programs to fix societal ills. I'm also disappointed that he is still playing the politician on gay marriage and is proposing a "separate but equal" solution. There are many other things I disagree with him about. However, I do believe he is the leader that can best repair our global relationships which the Republicans have torn asunder.
I can't support Bob Barr (the Libertarian candidate) because, although he has changed his tune very recently, he was a primary sponsor of the Defense of Marriage sham. He also led the charge to waste $400 MILLION dollars to impeach a president over that president's personal indiscretions. He has been an attack dog for the religious right, and when all is said and done, I'd rather be overtaxed and awash in social programs than governed by the religious right.
I certainly can't support a Republican. As I said, I've read their platform. Aside from their overt fascist tendencies, they are not fiscally conservative. In fact, they have been less fiscally conservative than the Democrats for 30 years now. Frankly, if we're going to burn through 1.6 trillion dollars on anything, I'd rather see New Orleans rebuilt, Michigan revitalized, etc etc.
Finally, re one party rule, I have no problem with that as long as the party is voted in by the people and can be voted out again. That's how Democracy works, not Marxism.
So, I eagerly look forward to writing President Obama to encourage other ideas be looked at before each new government program is established. He is not my perfect candidate, but he's the best I've seen in some time in the general election. If I could support my party's candidate, I would. But I prefer Obama to anyone else in the general, fairly enthusiastically in fact, so Obama it is.
June 24, 2008 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is one of the most intelligent and detailed posts I have read in a long time. Thank you.
June 25, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that the Aimey Mae's of the world feel it is their duty to retire HRC's campaign debt, which she accumulated through horrendous mismanagement and for which she has nobody to blame but herself, is in and of itself the best testament I can think of to HRC's skill as a politicain. Sure, she didn't win the nomination, but look at the rabid support she still has! Thousands of people are lining up to bail her out from the consequences of her own actions!
Obama would definitely benefit from the help of the Clintons, both of them, but it is entirely fair and reasonable to modulate how they help. If that means keeping either or both behind the scenes or making very little use of them at all, it is a judgment that needs to be made.
June 24, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find it deliciously ironic that, though Obama was the one initially charged with building a cult of personality, it was Clinton who attracted all these mentally imbalanced maniacs who were in need of a feminine LaRouche.
Of course, Aimee May's comments about the capital gains tax and Obama's "Marxism" strongly indicate that it's just a McCain supporter playing pretend, but the legitimate Hillaryis44 set are a testament to the Clintons' skill at solidifying a base of support by promoting conspiracy theories.
June 24, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
in keeping with Karl Roves country club metaphore, Bill Clinton is starting to sound like one of the old crusty guys who started a country club, and now sits around the club house drinking bourbon and bitching because they are letting Tiger Woods play on the course.
June 24, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Poor Bill.
He's never been fond of Obama. Bill was the "rock star" and now his thunder is being stolen by a new generation.
But that is life. I wish Bill could handle this like a grown up.
Hillary has much better than Bill.
June 24, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill Clinton is a whiny baby who got his feelings hurt. That's why he's not endorsing Obama.
June 24, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Obama becomes our ruler, he can have Clinton arrested for insufficient ass-kissing. What more do you want?
Obama Nation is the most insecure bunch of zealots I've ever seen. It's like you're afraid Barack is going to go all Saddam Hussein on you at a party meeting and start dragging people outside to be shot.
Where are the happy warriors?
June 24, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, I get ready to vote for Obama and a bunch of Obama mouth breathers make comments that just makes me want to vomit. If Obama loses the general election, you have only your selves to blame. Get a clue, buy a vowel plaese.
June 24, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
so vote for mccain.
i mean, anyone who is willing to base their vote on what supporters of a candidate say in a blog comment obviously doesn't take their vote very seriously anyway.