« Is Bogus Michelle Obama Rumor Based On A Work Of Fiction? | Home | Hillary's Concession Speech Will Kick Off Battle For Her Supporters »

Andrews Goes Silent After Accusing Clinton Camp Of Racially Divisive Strategy

As may know, Congressman Rob Andrews (D-NJ), who just lost a long-shot primary bid for the Senate against incumbent Frank Lautenberg, has made a serious accusation against the Hillary Clinton campaign -- and he doesn't appear to want to elaborate on the subject beyond that.

Andrews, a centrist who had been supporting Hillary in the primaries, told the Newark Star-Ledger that a high-ranking member of the Clinton camp approached him in the run-up to the Pennsylvania primary about using a strategy to exploit divisions between Jews and blacks, as a way of increasing Hillary's share of the Jewish vote in that big primary.

"Frankly, I had a private conversation with a high-ranking person in the campaign ... that used a racial line of argument that I found very disconcerting," said Andrews. "It was extremely disconcerting given the rank of this person. It was very disturbing."

Naturally, my editors wanted to find out more, and put me on the assignment of trying to talk to to Andrews and/or someone in his camp who could tell us in greater detail what happened. What strategies were discussed, for example, and was Andrews himself asked to take part in any dirty campaign tactics? We were genuinely interested in finding out just how much of a story there was here.

So I called some reliable sources in the Andrews camp that I've spoken to previously, as well as his Congressional office. I was able to speak briefly to one person who promised to forward my request to Andrews. But after that I never heard back. My later calls weren't answered, and none of my messages were returned.

Now obviously, there are any number of reasons the Congressman might be too busy to talk to a reporter. On the other hand, the overall silence here does lead to a reasonable guess: That after he spoke up about this to the Ledger, Andrews immediately regretted doing so -- and then quickly resolved to keep quiet from here on.


77 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I believe every word. After Clyburns revelation about Bill using foul language with him, I bet Andrews felt it was ok to come out with his experience with the Clinton campaign. BUT!!! I bet the big wigs in the Dem party, anxious to move to "party unity", gave him a talking to and ask him not to elaborate.

Just my tinfoil hat $0.02

Yep.

No need to go there anymore. BUT, I expect a gushing endorsement of Obama tomorrow at noon since Obama's discouraged disparaging talk by both Clyburn and Andrews ... and probably more folk, too.

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!

I'm looking forward to more EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR MCCAIN!!! from now on.

;)

Idiotic! Great to read you! I thought you were gone forever. Love the blog, btw.

Totally amazing that you all manage still to have a big pic of HRC on the front page. I look forward to you liveblogging Obama's inaugural from Chappaqua!

Aw, don't assume the worst without more evidence than who's picture is on the front page. This is the big day for Hillary, after all.

I think Josh and the gang are not grieving over Hillary's loss, but simply showing a very natural journalistic resistence to climbing on the Obama bandwagon. I prefer that they maintain a certain reserve and a little detatched skepticism about Obama, actually. I can afford Despite the personal opinions we all have (and that occasionally leak through), there's a professional attitude that says "I'm not on anyone's side, at least when I'm reporting."

I come from the camp that says that there's no such thing as an objective reporter. All I ask is that reporters and editors try to hew to facts first, then let we readers see which way they lean, and then we can judge the content fairly.

user-pic

It would also be nice if the Pollster.com graphs were replaced with their Obama v. McCain graph, and with a projected Electoral College map from either electoral-vote.com or from fivethirtyeight.com.

And if the InTrade graph was changed to the General Election.

user-pic

The thing is it could actually help Obama with the Jewish community if they knew that he was actively being swiftboated. But of course that would throw Clinton (a democrat - yeah right) under the bus. Can't have that.

It will be interesting how they actually pull this off. How can Hillary or Bill campaign for Obama? After all the whisper campaigns to these groups, can they really put on the smiley face and praise Obama up and down without looking like total liars to these groups?

I look forward to seeing how they try to squeeze their filthy toothpaste back in the tube.

You know I wouldn't mind if this threw Hillary Clinton under the bush. I hope this would break the spell that Hillary Clinton casted over her supporters who have been eminently opposed to Barack Obama which a lot due to the results of the media with the aid of the Clintons stirring the pot.
Feb. 26: MSNBC debate: Tim Russert's question of Obama's loyalty to Israel after Louis Farrakhan’s endorsement.
Remember how Hillary had to make a point of this saying that Obama denouncement wasn't enough.

Apr. 17: ABC debate: On George Stephanopoulos questioning Barack's ties to William Ayers of the Weather Underground.
Hillary decided to drive a wedge through it by bringing up Obama's recent reported Farrakhan’s endorsement (unwelcomed), and his church's Hamas ties listed in the Sunday pamphlets.

Then there were her surrogates

This isn't at all surprising. Creating division, divide and conquer, etc., is the very hallmark of triangulation, which the Clinton's excel at.

The good news is that the Clinton's will be safely ensconced to their home in NY or Hillary to the Hill after tomorrow. All is well, all is well, and all matters of things are well.

I don't see Obama choosing Hillary as VP or even Bill campaigning for him, after this.

It seems like the Clintons are more trouble than they are worth, in terms of what they can do for Obama. Certainly, they aren't trustworthy. Since Bill can't even be trusted not to put his foot in it for wife, how could he be trusted not to sabotage Obama's campaign?


I don't see Obama choosing Hillary as VP or even Bill campaigning for him, after this.

It seems like the Clintons are more trouble than they are worth, in terms of what they can do for Obama. Certainly, they aren't trustworthy. Since Bill can't even be trusted not to put his foot in it for wife, how could he be trusted not to sabotage Obama's campaign?


Sorry for the double post.

Re: "All is well, all is well, and all matters of things are well."

I think read some where, that the quote was one of Jackie Kennedy's favorite's but I don't remember where it comes from. Can you tell me?

user-pic

It would be interesting to know where that quote came from. But since we are speaking of quotes, this one came to mind - from one of the greatest Jewish Americans of our time:

"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices, but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thought in clear form" - Albert Einstein

Gives you chills, doesn't it?


Yes it does.

The really fierce opposition to Obama, has never made sense to me, but Einstein may have nailed it. It may also explain in a perverse sort of way, why so many people liked George Bush, for a while, at least. His mediocrity was no threat to the voter's ego.

Unfortunately, for some people, Homer Simpson, may be the ideal candidate.

You almost got the quote right. It's St. Julian of Norwich, and it's one of her most famous sayings:

"All will be well, and all will be well, all manner of things will be well."

She was one of those people who lived in a hermitage, and folks came to her for counseling. I imagine a lot of them were glad to hear that sentence.

Thanks Dirk, that's the quote I was thinking of but couldn't quite remember. Or as Bush would say, I misremembered.

user-pic

The quote is from a woman mystic in medieval times, Julian of Norwich. It was also used, in part, by T S Eliot. Julian used the words over and over in her writings: "All will be well. And all manner of things will be well." Eliot, in my view also a mystic, used these words more than once.

user-pic

It's from Dame Julian of Norwich, a mediaeval English mystic.

The year was 1992, the opponent was Paul Tsongas.

The Clintons took Tsongas' Gulf War position and a few out-of-context quotes and old Senate votes, turned them into scary leaflets and blanketed heavily Jewish areas with them. Then, days before the Florida primary, they sent in a New York congressman named Stephen Solarz to ratchet up the scare tactics to absurd—but, again, devastating-heights.

Linking opposition to the Gulf War to Israel's security was inflammatory and disingenuous, and Bill Clinton had only begun praising the war after it was fought and won. But the tactic worked.

Tsongas was thrown on the defensive, forced to rebut each supposed example of his "softness" on Israel manufactured by the Clintons, drowning out his own message. All the while, Bill Clinton fulminated against the press, fuming about its supposed favoritism toward Tsongas-a tactic that spurred much of the press to prove its fairness by treating Clinton's sham attacks as a straightforward policy dispute.

Jewish voters turned on Tsongas and flocked to Mr. Clinton, who won Florida, and the Tsongas campaign was effectively finished.

http://www.observer.com/2008/once-again-clinton-muddies-war-issue

Deja vu all over again...only this time it didn't work so good.

Thank you for this link. I have sent it to my mom who just two days ago was parroting the Clinton attack against Obama on the Iraq War vs. war funding votes. It will be of interest to her also because she was a Tsongas supporter in 1992. She probably has no idea that a Bill Clinton lie scuttled the Tsongas nomination bid. Reading the linked article and this diary reminds me of why we can all breathe a sigh of relief that Obama will be our nominee.
OBAMA08!

With both the Left and the Right willing to believe the worst of the Clintons, who exactly are the people who voted for her? Did they vote for her or against him? 17+ million is a lot of people.

And Andrews didn't say Bill or Hillary were involved, so why are you people attacking them for this? Did you feel the same about that "racist memo" the Obama campaign put out in January?


He won!

Just Chill out!

Save that anger for McCain!!

user-pic

You didn't read Greg's brilliant editorial on the memo (that wasn't racist at all)? Well, he simply didn't see a pattern.

Any time Obama makes a comment, like the bitter comment, almost all Dems defend him. When Clinton makes a comment, like the RFK comment, those same people are ready to string up. By the way Olbermann ranted, you would've thought she said the same thing that lady on Fox News said.

If this is really about her vote for the war, why aren't people just as angry at the other 109 Democrats who voted with her?

user-pic

I am angry at them, especially if they haven't apologized. But I don't have a chance to vote against them.

user-pic
user-pic

It takes some work for me to dig up my password here, so I do not say this lightly. This story stinks. If he didn't get back to you, then why publish this crap. This place feels like pox news. Yep, THIS is the shit they thrive on. News that takes no work to do, and leaves the consumer with no better understanding of anything.

I came to the tubes to find out shit that I can't find out on tv/in the checkout lane.

TPM was the first political blog I found a year and a half ago. You guys set the standard (in my eyes) for the vibrant, interactive, informative community on the innernetss that made me love politics [more].

WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED?

user-pic

People just started posting their complaints, and little else?

user-pic

OMG, THE PRIMARY IS OVER

Why are we talking about this? Who cares? Of course he's keeping his mouth shut, it doesn't help re-build unity in the party, which is what we need now.

I'm not going to deny that Hillary was a bit monstrous, sure. but the primary is over. It's History, finito.

Yeah, this stuff is weak. Who cares if a jackass like Andrews is throwing out vague yet inflammatory allegations about the Clinton campaign's conduct?

Once bitten, twice shy. I've followed this site for most of this election season, and many people have jumped on the unity pony at least twice and gotten thrown off both times. I think it's understandable that many (myself included) won't trust that pony again until they're damn sure it's broke. Hopefully tomorrow's concession will do the trick.

It matters. It matters because there is still talk about Hillary being in Obama's cabinet - hell, there's talk about her being his VP. Can she be trusted to support his administration, to serve that closely?

It also matters because it gives context to what those 17 million were hearing about Obama and may help them to open up and really hear what he has to say with fresh ears and see who he is with a fresh outlook. Not the diehards, of course, but the 17 million who voted for her are not die hards.

People who witness aganist the Clinton's have a way of dying,he probably was warned (threatened)
to shut up.

I have proof of this Clinton behavior

youtube search: the clinton chronicles 1-11,the mena connection,see for yourself how many people lost their lives.

.The Clinton's don't get mad they get even!!!


People who witness aganist the Clinton's have a way of dying ...

See, that's what TPM should be covering. Blow the lid off the whole Clinton conspiracy. One loser congressman who probably didn't get as much support for his bid to move up to the Senate as he thought he was entitled after supporting Hillary and wants to make trouble for his faithless allies isn't enough. You need to get into all those murders.

And also, how come you never point out the number of letters in her name? "Hillary Rodham Clinton" = 6-6-6. Okay, well, not exactly, but it's close. You should write about that.

It'd make more sense than flogging this dead horse.

I thought the trolls on here were bad, but I just spent some time over at No Quarter. Good gawd....

user-pic

Those people are fucking insane, right? Since December, the KKK Queen aka SusanHu or whatever brilliant name she's going by and that nutjob Larry Johnson have shown their asses nice and good. Then the commenters...geez, how do they type though the sheets?

Not too tough to figure out that the Obama camp, which is now the DEMOCRATIC PARTY, wants to kill this type of story before it gets legs. I don't doubt for a minute that its true and I built up as much anger at the Clintons as anyone over the past several months. But even I want to stop the Clinton bashing at this point, and I'm not known for giving up a grudge easily. It just doesn't serve any purpose - we all need her supporters in the tent pissing out at this point, not outside pissing in. I know a couple of Hillary supporters who are just incoherently sputtering mad at this point. I don't get it, but it doesn't matter. I want their votes. Continued insults to Hillary at this point, regardless of how justified, don't do any good.

You'll just have to wait until her next election to put a stake through her heart.

the racial stuff and her intellectual dishonesty disqualifies hiillary from any future role in the administration. thank you joe andrew for reminding us. may others remind us in bits and pieces later on when cnn next revs up their hillary v.p.talk.

About the Tsongas business: a friend of his told me that when Tsongas called Clinton to let him know that he was dropping out, he asked him why he lied about him. Clinton's reply was, "Grow up. That's how the game is played."

user-pic

I actually believe that he said that. In the clintons' minds politics is all about lying to get what you want and not get caught. They have zero credibility. It is refreshing that obama has character and we can trust what he says. I am glad to see the clintons go by the wayside.

While I do not agree with his political philosophy, sometimes George Will makes a cogent point. Here is how he ended a recent column on why Senator Obama should not pick Senator Clinton for the VP slot.

If you wish to read the entire column, here is the link to it.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/06/clinton_vp_pick_would_diminish.html

Excerpted last lines:

Clinton, having risen politically in her husband's orbit, is a moon shining with reflected light. Were Obama to hitch himself to her, he would reduce himself to a reflection of a reflection.


It sounds like just like the Clintons, I'd be surprised if they didn't do something like this.

Hopefully he speaks up some more.

can we just turn the page on this bizarre, disgusting couple already? we've reached the point where a Democratic congressman can accuse a Democratic party leader of inciting friction between Jewish Americans and African Americans as a way to win an election, and it's a believable claim. how far have our standards gone?

enough.

lol. Thanks Liam. I am stealing it.

Politico's Ben Smith has an interesting article on Hillary's campaign.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10910.html

user-pic

I can see why both the Clinton and the Obama camps would want this story tamped down. Anything to drag the cameras off Clinton. After today, she should stop being the headlines. It's time for the focus to get on Obama and the campaign against McCain.

Not that I'm optimistic that she'll get off the screen. I'm not believing anything about her concession and endorsement until I hear it from her own lips, and even then, I'll be watching for her to undermine him. After this campaign, I simply am incapable of trusting a thing she does.

Need to keep clintn out of the zpotlight. hopefully after today we will not be hearing much about them. people need to write to the 3 media outlets and tell them to shut the fuck up about sillary clinton. its over, she lost, it is time to move to the GE. she doesnt deserve anymore press. and she doesnt deserve to be vpotus either. good riddance.

Hillary offers an olive branch to Senator Obama.


http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/L/9/2/hillary-extends-a-branch.jpg

stealing this one too.

While I don't doubt the Clinton's played the race & Jewish cards, Andrews in an weaselly asshole.

The campaign he ran against Lautenberg was despicable. For weeks he had various non-stop attack ads and then came an ad came stating he was the one being attack, which was such a bold face lie because there hadn't been a single ad from Lautenberg.

Each of his ads was very reminiscent of how John McCain says he "won't do this" or "won't do that" and then 5 seconds later does exactly what he said he wouldn't do.

I have no doubt he turned on the Clinton's as a means to jump on the Obama band wagon and as a way to have leadership (Pelosi, etc.) stand behind him while he tried to keep the seat he gave up in Congress to run for the Senate.

(maybe someone else can expand on that drama, but from what I remember, he technically gave up the seat but is not trying to keep t since he lost his run for the Senate?)

He's an asshole.

Yep, it looks like the Dem party leaders and probably the Obama campaign itself got to him and told him to stay quiet about it.

I applaud him for telling the truth, but it probably could have waited a few more days, after her dropping out and all the overzealous Clinton supporters started demanding her on the ticket.

I am sorry but I am fed up with this "take everyone's word for anything" as long as it is anti Clinton. I hardly ever post here because no matter what you say if it isn't pro Obama you might as well get lost. Who says this man has any credibility after apparently running a divisive campaign against Lautenberg who just happens to be Jewish himself. This could be sour grapes for losing and a dig at him. And since when do anonymous sources take on such veracity or is it only because it is against Hillary, therefore it must be true. If this hatred continues as it is, then no matter what Hillary says Obama will never get the support he probably deserves with supporters like many who never seem to be able to talk him up only talk her down. Call me when it's time to vote and then I'll let you know then if Obama supporters have supported him or will continue to try and blame Clinton for anything and everything he might not be doing well with. If it comes down to the mantra of she isn't campaigning hard enough for him or supporting him enough and the HIllary hatred continues, then it will show me he doesn't deserve the Presidency when everyone has to make excuses for him. It will show me that Obama really deserves 4 more years in the Senate .

Damn, why did I not know that Hillary failed her first go at the Arkansas bar exam?

She failed the DC bar exam but passed the Arkansas exam is how it's reported on Wikipedia. That's not that big a deal. In my law school class, it was interesting how some top students failed and other very marginal ones passed. Some people either don't take it seriously enough or succumb to exam jitters. Others already have high pressure jobs and don't allocate their study time properly.

Repeated failures are another story.

It's funny reading on the net today all the political obituaries for Hillary, especially all the "how she lost" stories. Not one of them I've seen has suggested that she would have won if her opponent were white. Yet in the closest Democratic primary ever, millions of blacks - between 80% and 90% of blacks - voted for Obama. Had the black vote been split evenly between Hillary and her opponent, Hillary would have won. Yet while all the political obituaries list all the mistakes Hillary made, not one I've read says that race had anything to do with it. Maybe we really are heading toward a color blind society.

Probably because she had the majority of African American support to begin with and gradually lost it. He had to win over that support first by strong showings in the not-so-black Iowa and NH. You also incorrectly assume that every other component of his electoral support (besides the African American vote) would be stay the same if he were white.

Yep. In fact, part of Hillary's electoral strategy (probably cooked up by Mark Penn) was clearly to give Obama the black vote in order to solidify their strength among white voters, especially poorer ones who tend to be more racially sensitive. It almost worked.

If she hadn't taken that strategy and made a play for the black vote, she wouldn't have won as much of the white vote as she did. And that probably would have cost her more votes on the whole.

otto f

Woulda,Shoulda,Coulda,don't win races,FYI


Liam great quote,I heard it phrased differently.


Hillary wrapped herself in entitlement,and ran on experience...Bills,then skidded on oil(the gas tax holiday.)

Andrews should name names, and not just expect people to blindly believe his anonymous source.

Please don't mention Marc Penn,I can't stop laughing.When you are being paid 2.5 million/monthly,as a strategist,SHOULDN'T YOU KNOW HOW THE DEMOCRATS ALLOCATE DELEGATES?


Hillary kept saying,"IF THIS WAS THE REPUGNICAN PRIMARY,I WOULD HAVE WON."

Andrews needs to provide some specifics about his claim. Short of that, it just looks like a smear.

"Frankly, I had a private conversation with a high-ranking person in the campaign ... that used a racial line of argument that I found very disconcerting," said Andrews. "It was extremely disconcerting given the rank of this person. It was very disturbing."

Somehow the name Mark Penn jumps into mind.

Based on Penn's and the campaign's past behavior, I'm inclined to believe Andrews is telling the truth. But why now? Why not during the campaign when it might have made a difference? And why on the day when Hillary is endorsing Obama and we need to be trying to put old grievances behind us?

Moose49


I'm thinking terry and woflsonand Penn's partner Schoen.When Schoen told Hillary she need to go all out aganist Obama imo

IT'S BEEN SAID ,"THE ONLY WAY EVIL CAN PREVAIL,IS WHEN GOOD PEOPLE STAND BY AND DO NOTHING."


Why did he wait so long,when Bill was caught lying about useing race in S.Carolina,this info would've been right on time!

Moose49


I'm thinking terry and woflsonand Penn's partner Schoen.When Schoen told Hillary she need to go all out aganist Obama imo

IT'S BEEN SAID ,"THE ONLY WAY EVIL CAN PREVAIL,IS WHEN GOOD PEOPLE STAND BY AND DO NOTHING."


Why did he wait so long,when Bill was caught lying about useing race in S.Carolina,this info would've been right on time!

Moose49


I'm thinking terry and woflsonand Penn's partner Schoen.When Schoen told Hillary she need to go all out aganist Obama imo

IT'S BEEN SAID ,"THE ONLY WAY EVIL CAN PREVAIL,IS WHEN GOOD PEOPLE STAND BY AND DO NOTHING."


Why did he wait so long,when Bill was caught lying about useing race in S.Carolina,this info would've been right on time!

moose49

Sorry for the triple post ,computer gremlins at work!

user-pic

Andrews did, however, talk to Juan Melli of Blue Jersey.

Rob Andrews: "When you have a problem within a family, you better address it."


Andrews' story, which he revealed belatedly and apparently doesn't wish to substantiate with any verifiable details, smacks of sour grapes from a guy who mounted a really offensive primary advertising campaign attacking Lautenberg on grounds of his age. And while Pennsylvania has a fair number of Jews, they are not such a sizable. let along homegenous, voting bloc in that state that it would seem credible for Clinton to have made them a pivotal wedge in her primary campaign strategy. So, I don't believe Andrews' story for a moment.

I agree. What he's talking about makes no real sense based upon what he's said thus far.

You don't risk your life calling out the Clinton's without the chance of,how do I say this,
an "accidental voluntary sucide" like many others who got in their way. :) :)

Search youtube: the clinton chronicles 1-11,the mena connection,and Hillary the movie. Judge for yourself.

Hey guys,this is off thread, if you really want to read some crazy stuff,go to this repugnican blog for john mccain

www.blogsforvictory.com

You can post without any registration. They are still waiting for the Michelle O tape,hahahaha!

You will learn about their thought process.

This is hog wash, this idiot just lost a long shot bid and now he's trying to enchance his resume for a job at MSNBC. What a coward.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address