« Dems Favored To Pick Up Louisiana House Seat -- GOP Pessimistic | Home | Rasmussen: Obama Ahead By 12 In Oregon »

Zogby: Obama's Lead In North Carolina Shrinks, Indiana A Dead Heat

This morning's Zogby tracking polls show Barack Obama's lead in North Carolina slipping into the single digits, consistent with other polls, while also showing a tight race in Indiana. The numbers, compared to yesterday:

North Carolina
Obama 46% (-4)
Clinton 37% (+3)

Sample size: 627 likely primary voters, weighted for region, age, race and gender.
Margin of error: ±4%.

Indiana
Obama 43% (+1)
Clinton 42% (+0)

Sample size: 629 likely primary voters, weighted for region, age, race and gender.
Margin of error: ±4%.


Comments (161)

What's up with Guam? Didn't the polls close at 6 am this morning? The time difference is confusing me.

Guam is a ,blowout, for Obama.

Yesterday's ,Insider Advantage Poll, (not posted by Eric) shows Barack Obama's lead in North Carolina ,rebounding,.

Obama went from +15 advantage over Clinton just 2 weeks ago, to a -2 disadvantage during the recent Wright episode.

05/01 611 LV 49 44 Obama +5.0

04/29 571 LV 42 44 Clinton +2.0

04/14 541 LV 51 36 Obama +15.0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/RCP_PDF/INS_ADV_NC%20Dem%20tables%20May%

Nevermind. Looks like results will start to come in around noon. Should have looked again first.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20080503-134380/Tiny-Guam-has-its-say-on-US-presidential-outcome

Don't worry about NC, y'all. I promise you double digits. Early voting likely means the margin goes even higher.

Easley was booed loudly at the NC Jefferson/Jackson dinner last night.

From your mouth to God's (Goddess') ears! ;)

Yes, a very Obama centric crowd at a supposedly neutral event. She even had to wait while people chanted Obama during her speech.
Granted it was in Raleigh which is more likely to be prObama than in other parts of the state.

avatar

Jefferson-Jackson is a statewide event and Raleigh is the state capital. The most logical explanation for a strong Obama crowd is a whole lot of genuine enthusiasm for Obama. Hillary seems to win much of her public support with demands of owed loyalty, threats and intemidation. Obama inspires.

I think when Hillary finally leaves the campaign stage, even many of her allies will breathe a great sigh of relief. While many people are loyal to the Clintons because of past or expected favors, not many people like them, and most people do not respect the kind of campaign they have run.

Reptilian response.

avatar

erik klondike, i thought nine was a double digit? what am i missing? ...nine point two..my bad , got it.

LOLOLOL! Very good - wish I had thought of that response myself! ;)

It seems to me that Obama should pull a Hillary and start lowering expectations for NC, as Hillary did in PA when it appeared Obama was in striking distance. Hillary has shown an uncanny ability of controlling the media narrative regarding expectations. Obama always seems rather behind the eight ball on that one.

I think Obama will pull off an 8-9 point victory in NC. The question is will he win IN? Does the Zogby poll indicate late momentum in IN?

"With all the money she's spending, if she doesn't win Indiana by a significant margin, it indicates a problem with her candidacy."

I've decided that I'm swearing off polls and trusting in the wisdom of the voters. Either they will make the right (in my opinion) decision and we will have Obama as our nominee or they won't. I can't get whipped up into a lather over every microtrend poll that comes out. It's not good for my health or my sanity LOL! ;)

What if we all obama supporters, say, start trading receipes in all polls-related, breathless posts by Eric & Greg ? That sure would be a downer.

Chops to Hillarym, the thread opener who did brilliantly by ignoring Eric's rant.

You know what? Recipes and books - two subjects guaranteed to drive trolls away.

We used to use those on other blogs when the trolls got bad. They get bored when we start talking about something like music, books, recipes - they get disgusted and leave and the people on the threads start getting closer.

just sayin

Oh, I think that is a fabulous idea! I'm in! ;)

avatar

You know, one of my favorite books is "A River Runs Through It, by Norman McClean. What are some of your favorite books?

"Harpo Speaks!" (bien sur) and "Lord of the Rings" (like my main man, Stephen Colbert).

avatar

Given the math, can't we just reasonably say that either the voters of NC and IN will make the right decision and Obama will win the nomination... or they'll make the wrong decision, and he's *STILL* win the nomination?

Now, you watch if he wins NC by 9% how big a deal Clinton will make out of "shrinking his lead", which is EXACTLY what he did in Pennsylvania. I tell you, there's no justice in this primary. As my mother used to say, the rules change more often than I change my underwear (which is often, thank you very much LOL!) ;)

I hear ya Carol. I really take these things with a grain of salt. I'm convinced that Obama will be the ultimate victor. My only concern is how much damage he will take in the process. Will his negatives get raised to scary levels, etc.

I always smile when Hillary makes her electability pitch when her negatives consistently out poll her positives. Sort of reminds me of the Bush aide who remarked that they create their own reality. Magical thinking is not limited to rethuglicans it seems...

avatar

So let's say, for arguments sake, that Obama wins NC by

avatar

whoops sorry about that...what I wanted to say was:

Let's say that Obama wins NC by 1, and he also wins Indiana by 1.

Is the race over at that point? Or does Hillary find some way to spin that?

In my opinion, there's NO way she's going to concede if he wins both NC and Indiana by 1. That's much too close for her to do the right thing and get behind the presumptive nominee. She'll just consider it a mandate, she'll say she cut his "double-digit" lead in NC down to virtually nothing, and she'll prolong this agony perhaps all the way to the convention.

Besides, she has blowout wins in KY and WV to look forward to.

Not that they'll make a real difference, but she'll spin them for all they're worth.

whoops sorry about that...what I wanted to say was:

Let's say that Obama wins NC by 1, and he also wins Indiana by 1.

Is the race over at that point? Or does Hillary find some way to spin that?

Shrivti1, Hillary is like the late Charleton Heston who once claimed that his gun would have to be peeled from his cold, dead hands. This nomination will have to be peeled from Hillary's cold, dead hands. She's in this until the convention, or until the super's spring some of Hillary's "testicular" fortitude and put her out of her misery.

In short, she will spin any outcome of NC and IN as evidence of her inevitability.

Nodding head and "you know"--the Hillary spin tells.

Besides, she has blowout wins in KY and WV to look forward to.

Not that they'll make a real difference, but she'll spin them for all they're worth.

Yes she will. Please remember though how she has demeaned those red states that Obama won which will never swing blue in the general. That argument will be shelved temporarily while she basks in "red" state victory. Har-de-har-har.

avatar

It's very strange that Obama is ticking up in Indiana. Usually the weekend before a primary, the undecideds start breaking for Clinton. Hmmm, what's going on here ?

I sure hope so. Early voting results look very promising. I've got a feeling that Obama is going to have a little mini-surge in both NC and IN. I called PA a 9 point win for HRC, so my predicto-meter has been accurate lately. I say Obama by 12 in NC and Clinton by 4 in IN. And then on to the next primaries.

Damn it. This was supposed to be a reply to NC State Dem, AKA Walter.

It's very strange that Obama is ticking up in Indiana. Usually the weekend before a primary, the undecideds start breaking for Clinton. Hmmm, what's going on here ?

It is strange, and I'm not sure I believe it. This is Zogby afterall, but he does seem to have tweaked his methodology since just before PA, so who the heck knows. I will wait to see tomorrow's Zogby to see if the trend continues before reading too much into it.

avatar

Undecideds tend to break Clinton for a variety of reasons among which the fact she is better known.
Obama is a better known quantity in IN by virtue of being a neighbour.
That may help.

avatar

Zogby has become so skewed that at that point, his predictions are worthless.

Survey USA has been very close if you look at their final polling numbers for the latest set of primaries.

avatar

Zogby was dead on in Pennsylvania. The problem they've been having is that they have had a hard time predicting the percent of the black turnout, as it has varied between states. But given NC is very close to SC, where blacks turned out in vast numbers, I think he's going to get a very large black turnout and lots of early voters already in the bag.

No worries, there are a huge amount of undecideds in most of these polls but unlike PA, this is really Obama country and most of those will go for him. HRC hasn't been able to get much above 40 - between that and the early voting it will still be a double digit win for BO. The change from yesteday is just noise. Yesterday was probably a bit high for the way things are polling.

After the week/month that Obama has had, as long as he doesn't lose NC, expect a lot of supers to come out of the woodwork as it would demonstrate that Wright etc. is an injury and not a fatal blow. That and HRC's gas pandering is really pissing the supers off.

avatar

the ref will call the foul on obama under the rim even if he slipped and fell at mid court.

avatar

Just for the record the crosstabs show Obama 73%-10% among AA.
In other words a huge part of the undecideds is AA which is obviously good for him in the end. No way his support stays that low.
And they count AA for 33% of the sample. Early voters were close to 40% AA.

Keep that in mind when you watch the numbers.
The trends are interesting though.

Howey in Indiana has been stating that other pollsters have been reading the state wrong. Which could very well be the case. When was the last time there was a heated primary in Indiana, and when was the last time the pollsters came through? So you've got a bunch of pollsters who don't know the lay of the land very well. And my friends and family living in Indiana all suggest that there is a strong Obama vibe there. I predict that there will be some surprises - rural communities in the northern and central part of the state will vote for Obama in stronger numbers than expected, while Lake County (Gary and surrounding communities) will go for Obama but not merely as much as people are predicting. It's the one part of the state where racial tension still seems very much alive. Indy big for Obama. South Bend and Fort Wayne, I'd say could go either way. Bloomington definitely for Obama. Evansville I have no idea. I'm guessing it's Clinton territory but I would love to see Obama do well there.

If Obama wins NC by only 1 (or loses), I will eat my "Obama '08" hat. Hillary Clinton's perfect storm would hold Obama's margin with white voters to 35%, with black voters to 85%, and depress black turnout to 35% of the total.

Do the math, and Obama's worst case number is 52.5%, and that doesn't take into account Obama's rumored huge lead in heavy early voting (SUSA pegged at 57-39).

Another hidden nugget about the NC Dem electorate. Black registration is HUGE, but historically black turnout has not matched the registration ratio. If you believe that having a viable black Presidential candidate on the ballot won't change that, then I have a bridge to sell you. But historical models will underpredict the black vote, and I'd wager that every poll is doing just that.

Some of the polls' internals are also showing a vast majority of the undecideds being black. I would imagine that Team Obama feels damned good about how they will break, don't you?

Come on then - deliver, please. We can shut this shit down!

Yes we can. Yes we will. Count on it!

avatar

Come on NC and IN. Come on let's bring this campaign to an end.

After the week/month that Obama has had, as long as he doesn't lose NC, expect a lot of supers to come out of the woodwork as it would demonstrate that Wright etc. is an injury and not a fatal blow. That and HRC's gas pandering is really pissing the supers off.

I think the "Wright" controversy, happening now versus the general election, will help Obama in the long-term. I sense that people are already sick of the issue, and those that are reveling in it wouldn't be caught dead voting for Obama anyway.

Obama took a big hit, but I think he's handled it well. The question is whether the MSM moves on or fixates on it. I was shocked last night to see MSNBC's Dan Abrams devote his full show to the Wright issue. I didn't see such retrospectives over Hillary's lies about her bravery under sniper fire. Nor did I find her PA debate admission that she was knowingly perpetuating stories she knew to be false looped ad nauseum on the cable news show. The MSM dutifully moved on. Time for the MSM to move on as well.

I was shocked to see that to, and for them to tag it as a "Special Report". This all after Olbermann commented during Countdown about the media beating this "issue" into the ground.

EXCELLENT analysis NC State Dem. Thanks much!

One more thought - perhaps the undecideds will break differently this time because of WHY folks may be undecided. It's very possible that the non-stop Wright nonsense knocked some soft/medium Obama supporters into the undecided category. I expect almost all of those folks to come back into the fold. Hopefully, it's enough to get Obama to at least 47% in Indiana.

And I'll keep repeating myself - don't spend one second worrying about NC. He's going to dominate here.

avatar

That's great to hear!

I'm sorry I can't quell any doubts about him winning here in Indiana. Down in southern Indiana, it might as well be Kentuckiana. Its big margins for Clinton will probably throw the election to her, especially since the rest of the state is kind of close.

I think that even if Clinton wins Indiana (by like 2-6), if she loses NC by more than 8-10, she will see a surge of supers go to Obama (while possibly picking up some herself). Not only that, she will probabaly have to deal with some pretty high profile defections from her camp (fundraisers, supers, etc.).

Yep. Important to note that despite Indiana being the more competitive state here, NC has more delegates.

Well not that we all know what the transcript revealed in the War Room clip is, and we all know it was doctored, don't we want to get to the bottom of exactly who doctored it? I find astounding the fact checkers at TPM have this on complete media blackout? Bizarre.

Josh, Greg, Eric?

Why don't you go check the kerning?

avatar

As many of the most reasonable of us said, it was a stupid story when we believed Kantor had said that (what exactly does it have to do with with HRC anyway even if he had said those things ?) and it is still a stupid story now that it was proven not to be true.

Cantorian analysis not your forté?

Well Mark, it apparently was perpetuated by a pro-Obama supporter. I'm just waiting for Hillary's "dirty" trick. You know, the one she pulls in the eleventh hour before a particularly important primary.

avatar

I don't know how many supporters he has here, just outside of South Bend, but there are multitudes of his signs here. We are just 20 miles from South Bend, in Goshen (population about 30,000). I haven't seen one Hillary sign.

All I can tell is that Obama has some enthusiastic supporters here in Goshen. We even have an Obama office!

Obama supporters in Goshen? That's kind of like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Howard Dean serving in the Bush administration.

Goshen! I grew up in Warsaw. I can totally see Goshen going for Obama. And my mom in Warsaw is voting for Obama - the first time ever for a Democrat. Great to hear.

Goshen always struck me as slightly more "progressive" than the surrounding communities, probably because of the college there which, even though is Mennonite, is quite socially liberal (ie, focus on poverty and social work). I know it's crazy to call any community in Northern Indiana "progressive" but there you have it.

Insider Advantage Poll (not posted by Eric):

Obama went from +15 just over 2 weeks ago, sliding all the way down to Clinton +2 during the recent Wright carp. Now he's back to +5:

05/01 611 LV 49 44 Obama +5.0 04/29 571 LV 42 44 Clinton +2.0 04/14 541 LV 51 36 Obama +15.0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/RCP_PDF/INS_ADV_NC%20Dem%20tables%20May%202.pdf

Why didn't you post this poll Eric? You added it to the list on the side, but not as a post.

Insider Advantage Poll (not posted by Eric):

Obama went from +15 just over 2 weeks ago, sliding all the way down to Clinton +2 during the recent Wright carp. Now he's back to +5:

05/01 611 LV 49 44 Obama +5.0

04/29 571 LV 42 44 Clinton +2.0

04/14 541 LV 51 36 Obama +15.0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/RCP_PDF/INS_ADV_NC%20Dem%20tables%20May%202.pdf

Why didn't you post this poll Eric? You added it to the list on the side, but not as a post.

That was a rhetorical question, of course.

We all know why Eric didn't .. it doesn't fit his Hillary is winning meme.

I doubt they will use a RW blog for numbers.

You really are an idiot, aren't you?
LOL.

Weren't the Israelites enslaved by the Egyptians in Goshen? ;-)

avatar

eric clayfeild, how bout it huh?

I only pointed it out in 3 different threads yesterday.

LOL.

The Page is reporting that Obama is giving a major speech on "Assisting Working Families" in Indianapolis today at 12:45PM ET.

Ah, the timing is perfect...

http://thepage.time.com/

Obama '08!

Something is happening in our fair city of South Bend IN. People are early voting in droves, three times the rates in previous elections.

The Obama organization has been very active here and it shows.

Read this account from the local CBS station

http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/18498419.html


Felix - In Texas, the early voting went overwhelmingly to Obama.

Good to hear.

You Texans just didn't have enough black folks. We North Carolinians do.

avatar

Obama seems to do well in the Midwest.

I've heard the talk about states that have a very small and very large AA population going for Obama, but I don't like the narratives being spun around it. Usually it's something along the lines of: states with mixed race populations see minorities as competition, and think more resources will go toward the "competition" if a black man is in office. Either that or straight-up racism.

I don't think I buy that.

As a midwesterner myself (Mason City, Iowa. Go Big Red!) I'd like to think that it comes from the Midwestern BS meter that went off all through my state during the caucus season. The candidates went through my town a few times while I was visiting family, so I got a chance to see them all, and people just weren't buying the BS that Hillary was trying to lay on them. Trying to act like the "common man" or whatever she does is really insulting and condescending. We're not rubes or hicks. (and as long as I'm ranting I might add that I don't think there's more racism in Iowa than in other places, just because more white people live there. I don't know why people have that idea. It bugs me.)

My point: While Indiana is NOTHING like Iowa (except we both have lots of corn), I wouldn't be surprised if Obama ends up coming out ahead.

I totally agree with you

And I understand how you feel about your state being seen as racists or something.

I wish everyone who tries to analyze the votes would wait til after the election.

I hate this racial shit too and I really resent Josh jumping with both feet into that thesis about the "racial sink" or whatever it is.

I think it's bogus. There were 400 white people caucusing for Obama in my precinct in Dallas.

White people turned out all over Texas for Obama.

avatar

I continue to think he needs to push how absurd her gas tax proposal is and spell it out: 300,000 lost jobs and no highway and bridge repairs versus 30 cents a day in your pocket. She is depending on the voters being stupid. That should also be pointed out. It is a real insult to the voters. This issue is a potentially huge gift if he plays it right. I think it can really harm her. But as posted above, she always comes up with some scurrilous attack right before the primary that can't be disproven until after it is over and no one is listening (Obama as anti-choice in New Hampshire, Nafta/Canada-gate in time for Texas and Ohio).

avatar

I am much in agreement with Starlight. This gas taxz holiday issue represents the perfect moment for Obama to separate his politics (not necessarily his policies but his politics) from Clinton's politics.

Obama needs to respond powerfully to this Gas Tax Holiday business. JMHO, but I think he should start calling the Gas Tax Holiday the Boston Tea Party.

"Hey Indiana and North Carolina, this Gas Tax Holiday nonsense is a Republican con job. A holiday? John McCain and the Bush administration are trying to make it sound like we ought to have a big party to celebrate the fact that they're going to drop the price of gas from $3.75 a gallon to $3.65 a gallon, and work things around to put even more money in the pockets of big oil. Anybody remember what gas cost when they got into office? Those guys--it's like a mugger giving you back a quarter for the bus and saying hey, come by tomorrow, ok?

Boy, do we need a different kind of politics.

And Senator Clinton is right in there with them--proposing a minor variation on the same insulting idea. It's the Iraq war vote all over again--a lie to the American people and Senator Clinton supporting the War while splitting hairs over what it meant. It was a vote against the interests of Democrats and ordinary Americans then, and this gas tax nonsense goes against our interests today.

It seems pretty clear that the Republicans and Senator Clinton think we are all actually dumb enough to fall for this--that we'll knock back a couple of shots, slaughter some hawgs and get ready for a hoe-down to celebrate our GAS TAX HOLIDAY!

Well Indiana and North Carolina, I have a different idea. Let's tell the Republicans and Senator Clinton what we think of their politics. Instead of a gas tax holiday, let's turn this into a BOSTON TEA PARTY. Except instead of dumping tea in the harbor, let's dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! Instead of a dinky gas tax holiday, let's give them a permanent holiday!

What do you say? Let's make this the Indiana Tea Party and dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! Let's make this the North Carolina Tea Party and dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! And in November, we'll make this an All-America Tea Party and dump George Bush!

Something like that, anyway. The point is that the Gas Tax Holiday is nothing to celebrate. If Obama can capitalize on this moment, he can finally rally people around what bugs them about Clinton--not her policies outright, but her willingness to slash the crap out of Democratic principles for the merest appearance of bipartisanship.

In other words, it's not the policies, it's the politics, stupid........

avatar

Zogby is hogwash. when his first day of daily polling came out with NC +16 for Obama and Indiana tied, I pointed out that both were outliers and that he'd show movement towards Clinton in the following days and then breathlessly report it as a trend. Zogby was all over the place in the final days in PA - one day it was Obama +2 and the next day Clinton +16 and he got excited about the movement. The next day was Clinton +4 (he was reporting two day numbers, but giving away daily numbers as well). I don't trust his Indiana number now. I suspect the true numbers are that each candidate currently has a 7% point lead in their stronger state. I'm just waiting to see what Clinton will be pulling out of the bag at the last minute. I sure hope it's not an Edwards endorsement.

The ship has sailed on an Edwards endorsement pre-NC. There is no time for him to campaign or do anything useful for either campaign.

Elizabeth Edwards said in an interview earlier this week that neither she nor John were endorsing either candidate. She also said there was nothing to her saying she liked Clinton' HC plan better than Obama's. She says both are in support od universal healthcare. Sounds like they are ready to back the eventual nominee and don't want to make waves.

avatar


From "Head of State"

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/top-10-inducements-to-vote-for-hillary.html

Saturday, May 03, 2008

Top 10 Inducements to Vote For Hillary (For Letterman)

The Chicago Tribune's blog "The Swamp" has called for suggestions for the "Top 10"list for Hillary Clinton's upcoming Letterman appearance.


Happy to oblige:



Top 10 Inducements From the Clinton Camp To Vote for Hillary

10. All future Hoosiers teams can draft players from the NBA

9. Superdelegates will get actual Spandex costumes along with Super Power of choice

8. Permanent liquor tax holiday

7. Will limit husband to "low traffic" zones of White House

6. Promises to use only one personality throughout first 100 days of Presidency

5. Will hold Inaugural Ball in Smiley's Pub, Allentown, PA.

4. Free rides on Mark Penn

3. Will provide personal armed one-woman security detail through any combat zone

2. New shampoo: No More Tears

And the number 1 inducement to vote for Hillary Clinton:

1: New National Bird: Barbeque.

Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/top-10-inducements-to-vote-for-hillary.html

avatar

Oh...it's a ZOGBY poll. Crap.

Yeah those are usually worthless.

And here I was getting my hopes up.

avatar

Zogby gets a lot of shit, I think mostly for blowing California so bad (they had Obama up by 7, I think). Theyve gotten much better since then though, they were good in TX and OH, and dead on in PA.

Zogby is not credible.

avatar

Theyve been in the middle of the pack so far, and getting better since Super Tuesday.

yeah, well, neither are you. kthxbai!

6. Promises to use only one personality throughout first 100 days of Presidency

roflmao

I'll tell you one group of people who would prefer a Hillary presidency from the standpoint of their careers - comedians.

They're going to have a much harder time making fun of Obama.

But they'll manage, I predict.

The Obama/REV Wright freefall continues:

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll Saturday, May 03, 2008
he Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Hillary Clinton and John McCain essentially tied—Clinton attracts 45% of the vote while McCain earns 44%. At the same time, McCain leads Barack Obama 48% to 43% (see recent daily results). This has been a difficult week for Obama. When the week began, he was even with McCain and outperformed Clinton in general election match-ups.

In the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, it’s Clinton 47% Obama 44%. That’s the third straight day that Clinton has held a slight edge over Obama (see recent Democratic Nomination results).

Among all voters nationwide, McCain is viewed favorably by 52% and unfavorably by 45%. (see recent daily favorable ratings). Obama is now viewed favorably by 49% and unfavorably by 49%. For Clinton, the reviews are 48% favorable, 50% unfavorable. Those numbers reflect the best ratings for Clinton since March 12.

Obama's negatives within 1 % of Hillary. The freefall will continue. Free Reverend Wright, we need some more wisdom from him. TALK REV!

marginal is right. You are only marginally sane.

They cancelled one speech but if Obama did not pay him off, he will be back to pimp his book.

"Obama's negatives within 1 % of Hillary. The freefall will continue. Free Reverend Wright, we need some more wisdom from him. TALK REV!"

Reverend Wright could go on a press tour, say even more crazy things than already spoken - and that still wouldn't keep Obama from the nomination. How does that make you feel?

As long as Barry's not POTUS, I'm quite happy.

"As long as Barry's not POTUS, I'm quite happy."

Be prepared, on a daily basis for the next 8 or so years - to regularly ponder suicide. :)

Bushie would really have to further tank the USA (economy/Iraq) for Barry to be elected. Sorry but reality bites and Barry hasn't seen anything yet. The GOP makes Hillary look like Mother Teresa. If BO gets elected, so be it. I survived Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush II, so I can even survive Barry-O.

"Bushie would really have to further tank the USA (economy/Iraq) for Barry to be elected."

Using that misguided argument, Obama has the presidency in the bag then - the economy, and the clusterfuck that is Iraq is an absolute mess.

"Sorry but reality bites and Barry hasn't seen anything yet. The GOP makes Hillary look like Mother Teresa."

That argument is weak considering that Hillary's people have been using right wing tactics on him already - that what makes his path to the presidency that much clearer. I mean, tenuous guilt-by-associations haven't brought the guy down, Muslim smears, he was a drug dealer, the kitchen sink so to speak - and the next step the GOP can go is to just endorse all out racism, which America will flatly reject. Good luck with that tactic, Obama will be our next president.

"If BO gets elected, so be it. I survived Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush II, so I can even survive Barry-O."

Outside of the fact that Obam will be a vastly better president that any of the men you named - I suspect that you will be fine whomever takes up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

avatar

From where the campaigns are this weekend, seems to me that they think that O has a comfortable lead in NC and that IN is in play.

Except for one stop today in NC, Bill, Hill and Obama are in IN all weekend. If HRC thought she had a shot in NC and if O thought his win was in jeopardy, they'd be there.

avatar

whoops sorry about that...what I wanted to say was:

Let's say that Obama wins NC by 1, and he also wins Indiana by 1.

Is the race over at that point? Or does Hillary find some way to spin that?

Posted by shrivti1
May 3, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink

the race ended (it has been over for a while) when Hillary endorsed mcCain's gas holiday tax. Obama can now lose in NC, and Indiana and will still be nominated---because---Hillary blew it with the superdelegates. If she had started kissing up to right wingers earlier, she might be winning. But that gas tax sealed her fate---everything voters do from here on out will be ignored by the superdelegates---whose job it is is to choose a DEMOCRAT.

-everything voters do from here on out will be ignored by the superdelegates---whose job it is is to choose a DEMOCRAT.

The SDs will "ignore the voters" from now on? What?

I cannot understand this comment - where are you coming from?