« Dems Favored To Pick Up Louisiana House Seat -- GOP Pessimistic | Home | Rasmussen: Obama Ahead By 12 In Oregon »
Zogby: Obama's Lead In North Carolina Shrinks, Indiana A Dead Heat
This morning's Zogby tracking polls show Barack Obama's lead in North Carolina slipping into the single digits, consistent with other polls, while also showing a tight race in Indiana. The numbers, compared to yesterday:
North Carolina
Obama 46% (-4)
Clinton 37% (+3)Sample size: 627 likely primary voters, weighted for region, age, race and gender.
Margin of error: ±4%.Indiana
Obama 43% (+1)
Clinton 42% (+0)Sample size: 629 likely primary voters, weighted for region, age, race and gender.
Margin of error: ±4%.
Advertisement















What's up with Guam? Didn't the polls close at 6 am this morning? The time difference is confusing me.
May 3, 2008 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Guam is a ,blowout, for Obama.
Yesterday's ,Insider Advantage Poll, (not posted by Eric) shows Barack Obama's lead in North Carolina ,rebounding,.
Obama went from +15 advantage over Clinton just 2 weeks ago, to a -2 disadvantage during the recent Wright episode.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/RCP_PDF/INS_ADV_NC%20Dem%20tables%20May%
May 3, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nevermind. Looks like results will start to come in around noon. Should have looked again first.
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20080503-134380/Tiny-Guam-has-its-say-on-US-presidential-outcome
May 3, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry about NC, y'all. I promise you double digits. Early voting likely means the margin goes even higher.
Easley was booed loudly at the NC Jefferson/Jackson dinner last night.
May 3, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
From your mouth to God's (Goddess') ears! ;)
May 3, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, a very Obama centric crowd at a supposedly neutral event. She even had to wait while people chanted Obama during her speech.
Granted it was in Raleigh which is more likely to be prObama than in other parts of the state.
May 3, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jefferson-Jackson is a statewide event and Raleigh is the state capital. The most logical explanation for a strong Obama crowd is a whole lot of genuine enthusiasm for Obama. Hillary seems to win much of her public support with demands of owed loyalty, threats and intemidation. Obama inspires.
I think when Hillary finally leaves the campaign stage, even many of her allies will breathe a great sigh of relief. While many people are loyal to the Clintons because of past or expected favors, not many people like them, and most people do not respect the kind of campaign they have run.
May 3, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reptilian response.
May 3, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
erik klondike, i thought nine was a double digit? what am i missing? ...nine point two..my bad , got it.
May 3, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOLOLOL! Very good - wish I had thought of that response myself! ;)
May 3, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me that Obama should pull a Hillary and start lowering expectations for NC, as Hillary did in PA when it appeared Obama was in striking distance. Hillary has shown an uncanny ability of controlling the media narrative regarding expectations. Obama always seems rather behind the eight ball on that one.
I think Obama will pull off an 8-9 point victory in NC. The question is will he win IN? Does the Zogby poll indicate late momentum in IN?
May 3, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
"With all the money she's spending, if she doesn't win Indiana by a significant margin, it indicates a problem with her candidacy."
May 3, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've decided that I'm swearing off polls and trusting in the wisdom of the voters. Either they will make the right (in my opinion) decision and we will have Obama as our nominee or they won't. I can't get whipped up into a lather over every microtrend poll that comes out. It's not good for my health or my sanity LOL! ;)
May 3, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
What if we all obama supporters, say, start trading receipes in all polls-related, breathless posts by Eric & Greg ? That sure would be a downer.
Chops to Hillarym, the thread opener who did brilliantly by ignoring Eric's rant.
May 3, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know what? Recipes and books - two subjects guaranteed to drive trolls away.
We used to use those on other blogs when the trolls got bad. They get bored when we start talking about something like music, books, recipes - they get disgusted and leave and the people on the threads start getting closer.
just sayin
May 3, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, I think that is a fabulous idea! I'm in! ;)
May 3, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, one of my favorite books is "A River Runs Through It, by Norman McClean. What are some of your favorite books?
May 3, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Harpo Speaks!" (bien sur) and "Lord of the Rings" (like my main man, Stephen Colbert).
May 3, 2008 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given the math, can't we just reasonably say that either the voters of NC and IN will make the right decision and Obama will win the nomination... or they'll make the wrong decision, and he's *STILL* win the nomination?
May 3, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now, you watch if he wins NC by 9% how big a deal Clinton will make out of "shrinking his lead", which is EXACTLY what he did in Pennsylvania. I tell you, there's no justice in this primary. As my mother used to say, the rules change more often than I change my underwear (which is often, thank you very much LOL!) ;)
May 3, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hear ya Carol. I really take these things with a grain of salt. I'm convinced that Obama will be the ultimate victor. My only concern is how much damage he will take in the process. Will his negatives get raised to scary levels, etc.
I always smile when Hillary makes her electability pitch when her negatives consistently out poll her positives. Sort of reminds me of the Bush aide who remarked that they create their own reality. Magical thinking is not limited to rethuglicans it seems...
May 3, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
So let's say, for arguments sake, that Obama wins NC by
May 3, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
whoops sorry about that...what I wanted to say was:
Let's say that Obama wins NC by 1, and he also wins Indiana by 1.
Is the race over at that point? Or does Hillary find some way to spin that?
May 3, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
In my opinion, there's NO way she's going to concede if he wins both NC and Indiana by 1. That's much too close for her to do the right thing and get behind the presumptive nominee. She'll just consider it a mandate, she'll say she cut his "double-digit" lead in NC down to virtually nothing, and she'll prolong this agony perhaps all the way to the convention.
May 3, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Besides, she has blowout wins in KY and WV to look forward to.
Not that they'll make a real difference, but she'll spin them for all they're worth.
May 3, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Shrivti1, Hillary is like the late Charleton Heston who once claimed that his gun would have to be peeled from his cold, dead hands. This nomination will have to be peeled from Hillary's cold, dead hands. She's in this until the convention, or until the super's spring some of Hillary's "testicular" fortitude and put her out of her misery.
In short, she will spin any outcome of NC and IN as evidence of her inevitability.
May 3, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nodding head and "you know"--the Hillary spin tells.
May 3, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes she will. Please remember though how she has demeaned those red states that Obama won which will never swing blue in the general. That argument will be shelved temporarily while she basks in "red" state victory. Har-de-har-har.
May 3, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's very strange that Obama is ticking up in Indiana. Usually the weekend before a primary, the undecideds start breaking for Clinton. Hmmm, what's going on here ?
May 3, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I sure hope so. Early voting results look very promising. I've got a feeling that Obama is going to have a little mini-surge in both NC and IN. I called PA a 9 point win for HRC, so my predicto-meter has been accurate lately. I say Obama by 12 in NC and Clinton by 4 in IN. And then on to the next primaries.
May 3, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn it. This was supposed to be a reply to NC State Dem, AKA Walter.
May 3, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is strange, and I'm not sure I believe it. This is Zogby afterall, but he does seem to have tweaked his methodology since just before PA, so who the heck knows. I will wait to see tomorrow's Zogby to see if the trend continues before reading too much into it.
May 3, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Undecideds tend to break Clinton for a variety of reasons among which the fact she is better known.
Obama is a better known quantity in IN by virtue of being a neighbour.
That may help.
May 3, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zogby has become so skewed that at that point, his predictions are worthless.
Survey USA has been very close if you look at their final polling numbers for the latest set of primaries.
May 3, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zogby was dead on in Pennsylvania. The problem they've been having is that they have had a hard time predicting the percent of the black turnout, as it has varied between states. But given NC is very close to SC, where blacks turned out in vast numbers, I think he's going to get a very large black turnout and lots of early voters already in the bag.
May 3, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
No worries, there are a huge amount of undecideds in most of these polls but unlike PA, this is really Obama country and most of those will go for him. HRC hasn't been able to get much above 40 - between that and the early voting it will still be a double digit win for BO. The change from yesteday is just noise. Yesterday was probably a bit high for the way things are polling.
After the week/month that Obama has had, as long as he doesn't lose NC, expect a lot of supers to come out of the woodwork as it would demonstrate that Wright etc. is an injury and not a fatal blow. That and HRC's gas pandering is really pissing the supers off.
May 3, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
the ref will call the foul on obama under the rim even if he slipped and fell at mid court.
May 3, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just for the record the crosstabs show Obama 73%-10% among AA.
In other words a huge part of the undecideds is AA which is obviously good for him in the end. No way his support stays that low.
And they count AA for 33% of the sample. Early voters were close to 40% AA.
Keep that in mind when you watch the numbers.
The trends are interesting though.
May 3, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Howey in Indiana has been stating that other pollsters have been reading the state wrong. Which could very well be the case. When was the last time there was a heated primary in Indiana, and when was the last time the pollsters came through? So you've got a bunch of pollsters who don't know the lay of the land very well. And my friends and family living in Indiana all suggest that there is a strong Obama vibe there. I predict that there will be some surprises - rural communities in the northern and central part of the state will vote for Obama in stronger numbers than expected, while Lake County (Gary and surrounding communities) will go for Obama but not merely as much as people are predicting. It's the one part of the state where racial tension still seems very much alive. Indy big for Obama. South Bend and Fort Wayne, I'd say could go either way. Bloomington definitely for Obama. Evansville I have no idea. I'm guessing it's Clinton territory but I would love to see Obama do well there.
May 3, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama wins NC by only 1 (or loses), I will eat my "Obama '08" hat. Hillary Clinton's perfect storm would hold Obama's margin with white voters to 35%, with black voters to 85%, and depress black turnout to 35% of the total.
Do the math, and Obama's worst case number is 52.5%, and that doesn't take into account Obama's rumored huge lead in heavy early voting (SUSA pegged at 57-39).
Another hidden nugget about the NC Dem electorate. Black registration is HUGE, but historically black turnout has not matched the registration ratio. If you believe that having a viable black Presidential candidate on the ballot won't change that, then I have a bridge to sell you. But historical models will underpredict the black vote, and I'd wager that every poll is doing just that.
Some of the polls' internals are also showing a vast majority of the undecideds being black. I would imagine that Team Obama feels damned good about how they will break, don't you?
May 3, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Come on then - deliver, please. We can shut this shit down!
May 3, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes we can. Yes we will. Count on it!
May 3, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Come on NC and IN. Come on let's bring this campaign to an end.
May 3, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the "Wright" controversy, happening now versus the general election, will help Obama in the long-term. I sense that people are already sick of the issue, and those that are reveling in it wouldn't be caught dead voting for Obama anyway.
Obama took a big hit, but I think he's handled it well. The question is whether the MSM moves on or fixates on it. I was shocked last night to see MSNBC's Dan Abrams devote his full show to the Wright issue. I didn't see such retrospectives over Hillary's lies about her bravery under sniper fire. Nor did I find her PA debate admission that she was knowingly perpetuating stories she knew to be false looped ad nauseum on the cable news show. The MSM dutifully moved on. Time for the MSM to move on as well.
May 3, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was shocked to see that to, and for them to tag it as a "Special Report". This all after Olbermann commented during Countdown about the media beating this "issue" into the ground.
May 3, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
EXCELLENT analysis NC State Dem. Thanks much!
May 3, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more thought - perhaps the undecideds will break differently this time because of WHY folks may be undecided. It's very possible that the non-stop Wright nonsense knocked some soft/medium Obama supporters into the undecided category. I expect almost all of those folks to come back into the fold. Hopefully, it's enough to get Obama to at least 47% in Indiana.
And I'll keep repeating myself - don't spend one second worrying about NC. He's going to dominate here.
May 3, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's great to hear!
I'm sorry I can't quell any doubts about him winning here in Indiana. Down in southern Indiana, it might as well be Kentuckiana. Its big margins for Clinton will probably throw the election to her, especially since the rest of the state is kind of close.
May 3, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think that even if Clinton wins Indiana (by like 2-6), if she loses NC by more than 8-10, she will see a surge of supers go to Obama (while possibly picking up some herself). Not only that, she will probabaly have to deal with some pretty high profile defections from her camp (fundraisers, supers, etc.).
May 3, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Important to note that despite Indiana being the more competitive state here, NC has more delegates.
May 3, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well not that we all know what the transcript revealed in the War Room clip is, and we all know it was doctored, don't we want to get to the bottom of exactly who doctored it? I find astounding the fact checkers at TPM have this on complete media blackout? Bizarre.
Josh, Greg, Eric?
May 3, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why don't you go check the kerning?
May 3, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
As many of the most reasonable of us said, it was a stupid story when we believed Kantor had said that (what exactly does it have to do with with HRC anyway even if he had said those things ?) and it is still a stupid story now that it was proven not to be true.
May 3, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cantorian analysis not your forté?
May 3, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Mark, it apparently was perpetuated by a pro-Obama supporter. I'm just waiting for Hillary's "dirty" trick. You know, the one she pulls in the eleventh hour before a particularly important primary.
May 3, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know how many supporters he has here, just outside of South Bend, but there are multitudes of his signs here. We are just 20 miles from South Bend, in Goshen (population about 30,000). I haven't seen one Hillary sign.
All I can tell is that Obama has some enthusiastic supporters here in Goshen. We even have an Obama office!
Obama supporters in Goshen? That's kind of like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Howard Dean serving in the Bush administration.
May 3, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Goshen! I grew up in Warsaw. I can totally see Goshen going for Obama. And my mom in Warsaw is voting for Obama - the first time ever for a Democrat. Great to hear.
May 3, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Goshen always struck me as slightly more "progressive" than the surrounding communities, probably because of the college there which, even though is Mennonite, is quite socially liberal (ie, focus on poverty and social work). I know it's crazy to call any community in Northern Indiana "progressive" but there you have it.
May 3, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Insider Advantage Poll (not posted by Eric):
Obama went from +15 just over 2 weeks ago, sliding all the way down to Clinton +2 during the recent Wright carp. Now he's back to +5:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/RCP_PDF/INS_ADV_NC%20Dem%20tables%20May%202.pdf
Why didn't you post this poll Eric? You added it to the list on the side, but not as a post.
May 3, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Insider Advantage Poll (not posted by Eric):
Obama went from +15 just over 2 weeks ago, sliding all the way down to Clinton +2 during the recent Wright carp. Now he's back to +5:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/RCP_PDF/INS_ADV_NC%20Dem%20tables%20May%202.pdf
Why didn't you post this poll Eric? You added it to the list on the side, but not as a post.
May 3, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was a rhetorical question, of course.
We all know why Eric didn't .. it doesn't fit his Hillary is winning meme.
May 3, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt they will use a RW blog for numbers.
May 3, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
You really are an idiot, aren't you?
LOL.
May 3, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Weren't the Israelites enslaved by the Egyptians in Goshen? ;-)
May 3, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
eric clayfeild, how bout it huh?
May 3, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I only pointed it out in 3 different threads yesterday.
LOL.
May 3, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Page is reporting that Obama is giving a major speech on "Assisting Working Families" in Indianapolis today at 12:45PM ET.
Ah, the timing is perfect...
http://thepage.time.com/
Obama '08!
May 3, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Something is happening in our fair city of South Bend IN. People are early voting in droves, three times the rates in previous elections.
The Obama organization has been very active here and it shows.
Read this account from the local CBS station
http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/18498419.html
May 3, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Felix - In Texas, the early voting went overwhelmingly to Obama.
Good to hear.
May 3, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
You Texans just didn't have enough black folks. We North Carolinians do.
May 3, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama seems to do well in the Midwest.
I've heard the talk about states that have a very small and very large AA population going for Obama, but I don't like the narratives being spun around it. Usually it's something along the lines of: states with mixed race populations see minorities as competition, and think more resources will go toward the "competition" if a black man is in office. Either that or straight-up racism.
I don't think I buy that.
As a midwesterner myself (Mason City, Iowa. Go Big Red!) I'd like to think that it comes from the Midwestern BS meter that went off all through my state during the caucus season. The candidates went through my town a few times while I was visiting family, so I got a chance to see them all, and people just weren't buying the BS that Hillary was trying to lay on them. Trying to act like the "common man" or whatever she does is really insulting and condescending. We're not rubes or hicks. (and as long as I'm ranting I might add that I don't think there's more racism in Iowa than in other places, just because more white people live there. I don't know why people have that idea. It bugs me.)
My point: While Indiana is NOTHING like Iowa (except we both have lots of corn), I wouldn't be surprised if Obama ends up coming out ahead.
May 3, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree with you
And I understand how you feel about your state being seen as racists or something.
I wish everyone who tries to analyze the votes would wait til after the election.
I hate this racial shit too and I really resent Josh jumping with both feet into that thesis about the "racial sink" or whatever it is.
I think it's bogus. There were 400 white people caucusing for Obama in my precinct in Dallas.
White people turned out all over Texas for Obama.
May 3, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I continue to think he needs to push how absurd her gas tax proposal is and spell it out: 300,000 lost jobs and no highway and bridge repairs versus 30 cents a day in your pocket. She is depending on the voters being stupid. That should also be pointed out. It is a real insult to the voters. This issue is a potentially huge gift if he plays it right. I think it can really harm her. But as posted above, she always comes up with some scurrilous attack right before the primary that can't be disproven until after it is over and no one is listening (Obama as anti-choice in New Hampshire, Nafta/Canada-gate in time for Texas and Ohio).
May 3, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am much in agreement with Starlight. This gas taxz holiday issue represents the perfect moment for Obama to separate his politics (not necessarily his policies but his politics) from Clinton's politics.
Obama needs to respond powerfully to this Gas Tax Holiday business. JMHO, but I think he should start calling the Gas Tax Holiday the Boston Tea Party.
"Hey Indiana and North Carolina, this Gas Tax Holiday nonsense is a Republican con job. A holiday? John McCain and the Bush administration are trying to make it sound like we ought to have a big party to celebrate the fact that they're going to drop the price of gas from $3.75 a gallon to $3.65 a gallon, and work things around to put even more money in the pockets of big oil. Anybody remember what gas cost when they got into office? Those guys--it's like a mugger giving you back a quarter for the bus and saying hey, come by tomorrow, ok?
Boy, do we need a different kind of politics.
And Senator Clinton is right in there with them--proposing a minor variation on the same insulting idea. It's the Iraq war vote all over again--a lie to the American people and Senator Clinton supporting the War while splitting hairs over what it meant. It was a vote against the interests of Democrats and ordinary Americans then, and this gas tax nonsense goes against our interests today.
It seems pretty clear that the Republicans and Senator Clinton think we are all actually dumb enough to fall for this--that we'll knock back a couple of shots, slaughter some hawgs and get ready for a hoe-down to celebrate our GAS TAX HOLIDAY!
Well Indiana and North Carolina, I have a different idea. Let's tell the Republicans and Senator Clinton what we think of their politics. Instead of a gas tax holiday, let's turn this into a BOSTON TEA PARTY. Except instead of dumping tea in the harbor, let's dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! Instead of a dinky gas tax holiday, let's give them a permanent holiday!
What do you say? Let's make this the Indiana Tea Party and dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! Let's make this the North Carolina Tea Party and dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! And in November, we'll make this an All-America Tea Party and dump George Bush!
Something like that, anyway. The point is that the Gas Tax Holiday is nothing to celebrate. If Obama can capitalize on this moment, he can finally rally people around what bugs them about Clinton--not her policies outright, but her willingness to slash the crap out of Democratic principles for the merest appearance of bipartisanship.
In other words, it's not the policies, it's the politics, stupid........
May 3, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zogby is hogwash. when his first day of daily polling came out with NC +16 for Obama and Indiana tied, I pointed out that both were outliers and that he'd show movement towards Clinton in the following days and then breathlessly report it as a trend. Zogby was all over the place in the final days in PA - one day it was Obama +2 and the next day Clinton +16 and he got excited about the movement. The next day was Clinton +4 (he was reporting two day numbers, but giving away daily numbers as well). I don't trust his Indiana number now. I suspect the true numbers are that each candidate currently has a 7% point lead in their stronger state. I'm just waiting to see what Clinton will be pulling out of the bag at the last minute. I sure hope it's not an Edwards endorsement.
May 3, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
The ship has sailed on an Edwards endorsement pre-NC. There is no time for him to campaign or do anything useful for either campaign.
May 3, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Elizabeth Edwards said in an interview earlier this week that neither she nor John were endorsing either candidate. She also said there was nothing to her saying she liked Clinton' HC plan better than Obama's. She says both are in support od universal healthcare. Sounds like they are ready to back the eventual nominee and don't want to make waves.
May 3, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
From "Head of State"
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/top-10-inducements-to-vote-for-hillary.html
Saturday, May 03, 2008
Top 10 Inducements to Vote For Hillary (For Letterman)
The Chicago Tribune's blog "The Swamp" has called for suggestions for the "Top 10"list for Hillary Clinton's upcoming Letterman appearance.
Happy to oblige:
Top 10 Inducements From the Clinton Camp To Vote for Hillary
10. All future Hoosiers teams can draft players from the NBA
9. Superdelegates will get actual Spandex costumes along with Super Power of choice
8. Permanent liquor tax holiday
7. Will limit husband to "low traffic" zones of White House
6. Promises to use only one personality throughout first 100 days of Presidency
5. Will hold Inaugural Ball in Smiley's Pub, Allentown, PA.
4. Free rides on Mark Penn
3. Will provide personal armed one-woman security detail through any combat zone
2. New shampoo: No More Tears
And the number 1 inducement to vote for Hillary Clinton:
1: New National Bird: Barbeque.
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/top-10-inducements-to-vote-for-hillary.html
May 3, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh...it's a ZOGBY poll. Crap.
Yeah those are usually worthless.
And here I was getting my hopes up.
May 3, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zogby gets a lot of shit, I think mostly for blowing California so bad (they had Obama up by 7, I think). Theyve gotten much better since then though, they were good in TX and OH, and dead on in PA.
May 3, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zogby is not credible.
May 3, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Theyve been in the middle of the pack so far, and getting better since Super Tuesday.
May 3, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, well, neither are you. kthxbai!
May 3, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
roflmao
I'll tell you one group of people who would prefer a Hillary presidency from the standpoint of their careers - comedians.
They're going to have a much harder time making fun of Obama.
But they'll manage, I predict.
May 3, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama/REV Wright freefall continues:
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll Saturday, May 03, 2008
he Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Hillary Clinton and John McCain essentially tied—Clinton attracts 45% of the vote while McCain earns 44%. At the same time, McCain leads Barack Obama 48% to 43% (see recent daily results). This has been a difficult week for Obama. When the week began, he was even with McCain and outperformed Clinton in general election match-ups.
In the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, it’s Clinton 47% Obama 44%. That’s the third straight day that Clinton has held a slight edge over Obama (see recent Democratic Nomination results).
Among all voters nationwide, McCain is viewed favorably by 52% and unfavorably by 45%. (see recent daily favorable ratings). Obama is now viewed favorably by 49% and unfavorably by 49%. For Clinton, the reviews are 48% favorable, 50% unfavorable. Those numbers reflect the best ratings for Clinton since March 12.
Obama's negatives within 1 % of Hillary. The freefall will continue. Free Reverend Wright, we need some more wisdom from him. TALK REV!
May 3, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
marginal is right. You are only marginally sane.
May 3, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
They cancelled one speech but if Obama did not pay him off, he will be back to pimp his book.
May 3, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Obama's negatives within 1 % of Hillary. The freefall will continue. Free Reverend Wright, we need some more wisdom from him. TALK REV!"
Reverend Wright could go on a press tour, say even more crazy things than already spoken - and that still wouldn't keep Obama from the nomination. How does that make you feel?
May 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
As long as Barry's not POTUS, I'm quite happy.
May 3, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"As long as Barry's not POTUS, I'm quite happy."
Be prepared, on a daily basis for the next 8 or so years - to regularly ponder suicide. :)
May 3, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bushie would really have to further tank the USA (economy/Iraq) for Barry to be elected. Sorry but reality bites and Barry hasn't seen anything yet. The GOP makes Hillary look like Mother Teresa. If BO gets elected, so be it. I survived Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush II, so I can even survive Barry-O.
May 3, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Bushie would really have to further tank the USA (economy/Iraq) for Barry to be elected."
Using that misguided argument, Obama has the presidency in the bag then - the economy, and the clusterfuck that is Iraq is an absolute mess.
"Sorry but reality bites and Barry hasn't seen anything yet. The GOP makes Hillary look like Mother Teresa."
That argument is weak considering that Hillary's people have been using right wing tactics on him already - that what makes his path to the presidency that much clearer. I mean, tenuous guilt-by-associations haven't brought the guy down, Muslim smears, he was a drug dealer, the kitchen sink so to speak - and the next step the GOP can go is to just endorse all out racism, which America will flatly reject. Good luck with that tactic, Obama will be our next president.
"If BO gets elected, so be it. I survived Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush II, so I can even survive Barry-O."
Outside of the fact that Obam will be a vastly better president that any of the men you named - I suspect that you will be fine whomever takes up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
May 3, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
From where the campaigns are this weekend, seems to me that they think that O has a comfortable lead in NC and that IN is in play.
Except for one stop today in NC, Bill, Hill and Obama are in IN all weekend. If HRC thought she had a shot in NC and if O thought his win was in jeopardy, they'd be there.
May 3, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
whoops sorry about that...what I wanted to say was:
Let's say that Obama wins NC by 1, and he also wins Indiana by 1.
Is the race over at that point? Or does Hillary find some way to spin that?
Posted by shrivti1
May 3, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
the race ended (it has been over for a while) when Hillary endorsed mcCain's gas holiday tax. Obama can now lose in NC, and Indiana and will still be nominated---because---Hillary blew it with the superdelegates. If she had started kissing up to right wingers earlier, she might be winning. But that gas tax sealed her fate---everything voters do from here on out will be ignored by the superdelegates---whose job it is is to choose a DEMOCRAT.
May 3, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
The SDs will "ignore the voters" from now on? What?
I cannot understand this comment - where are you coming from?
May 3, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
497 to 401 37% for Obama.
Is he finally going to win one?
Maybe but Clinton wins the double header Tuesday.
May 3, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Couple things...
"Finally"??? He won the two before PA. Hillary, before Guam, had a winning streak of... one!
Also, if she doesnt win the double header, will you admit she should probably drop out?
May 3, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
No.
Will Obama stop playing the race card:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/02/irresponsible/
I think she should make an ad about that and Obama's lie of a new kind of politics.
Then Obama drops out.
May 3, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
You insufferable twit.
The story you linked to is accusing Rep. Dan Burton (R) of Indiana as the possible source of the War Room story.
He's a REPUBLICAN you moron, NOT an Obama supporter.
GET YOUR F*CKING FACTS RIGHT YOU LIBELOUS A$$HAT
May 3, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The ONLY mention of anyone culpable in this story is Jack Tapper for not checking his facts.
NOT ONE MENTION OF ANYONE FROM OBAMA CAMPAIGN.
ARE WE STRAIGHT ON THIS NOW??
May 3, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
HILLARY has cut obama's lead in Guam to 26?
The SDs will "ignore the voters" from now on? What?
I cannot understand this comment - where are you coming from?
They really hate what she did with the gasoline holiday pandering. Even if it works and gets her a few votes, any impression more votes for her in Indiana and NC will be trumped by the stupidity of what Hillary did in taking cynical pandering up another level. It affected a lot of them.
obama is already assured of the lead in delegates and votes---even if Hillary gets 70 percent from here on in---it will not be enough. She has really pissed off the one group who still gave her some pretense of a chance.
May 3, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama chants on Hillary sppech in NC. The audio is crappy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqcJOfelTsc
May 3, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
C'mon gotalife. This is your one chance to prove to me that you are truly a Hillary supporter and not some asshbole trying to shit all of the times just to stir shit....
Both candidates are spending the entire weekend in Indiana, and not going anywhere near North Carolina.
Sooooooooo We (Obamakoolaidians AND Clintonbrainwashedracists)can assume many things
1. If Clinton had a shot in hell at NC, she'd be ALL over it this weekend. The game changer is NC,NOT IN. A win in NC (or even a close showing) puts Clinton in arosey spot.
2. If Obama's internals were showing NC to be too close or even showing him losing HE would be all over NC. He needs to win it, and needs to win it by the same 9% that Hillary won Pennsylvania.
Therefore....
3. If Hillary is in IN until Tuesday, then her camp knows NC is safely Obama... and by the margins he needs.
4. If Obama is in IN until Tuesday, then his camp knows NC is safely for Obama... and by the margins he needs.
Sooooooooooo
5. Odds are that NC is going to be anywhere from 9% to 15% for Obama.
6. Indiana is the true battleground.
Come on gotalife.... I am serious. Can you agree to that? It is just logic... not taking a position for one candidate or another. I'm not asking you to love or vote for Obama. I am just asking you to admit that it looks like NC is going to go to Obama with the numbers expected because the candidates aren't going anywhere near it. If the win was going to be bigger than expected or smaller than expected, they'd both be ALL over it like George Bush on a baggy of cocaine in 1970's.
This is your chance to show me you're not just an antagonistic troll... but a true, logical supporter of Hillary Clinton.
May 3, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
You left out her secret weapon in NC.
President Bill Clinton making 6 stops a day in rural NC.
Obama is hoping for a large AA turn out but will not be enough because NC is majority white.
She wins Indiana by 10 and NC by 2.
Game changing indeed.
May 3, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
"President Bill Clinton making 6 stops a day in rural NC."
President Clinton could go door to door and give every NC resident a new car, and for shits and giggles he could shit out South African krugerrands - that still won't stop his wife getting pummeled in North Carolina.
"Game changing indeed."
Game changing my ass, she already lost the nomination.
May 3, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trust me. He's not worth debating with or trying to get a reasonable assessment.
He's for Hillary the way Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough and Ann Coulter are for Hillary.
He's an antagonistic McCain Troll.
May 3, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course in northwest Indiana it might as well be Chicago.
Busloads of Michigan people are headed down to go door-to-door today. I'd be with them, but I gotta work.
May 3, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Busloads of Ohio Obama supporters (especially from Columbus, Dayton & Cincinnati)are heading over to Indiana too.
Yes We Can!
May 3, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary coming on strong in Guam . 11 of 19 precincts in---down by 6.
This could turn the whole thing around. If she gets half the 4 guam delegates...then...the superdelegates will have to be impressed?
May 3, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, she is Guam too.
Wow, I thought it was a Obama blow out.
Uh oh.
May 3, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clintons must be very proud to have the undying support of Gotalife, the Racist Scumbag Aryan Nation Troll(ANT)
Here is what that pet sewer rat of the Grand Wizard wrote yesterday.
=============================================
Among the many allegations in the chain email is one about Obama’s name: “By the way. His true name is Barak Hussein Muhammed Obama. Won’t that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran!” That's blatantly not true, as far as we know. But the campaign still won't release his birth certificate which
perhaps is adding fuel to the rumor."
Uh oh.
Posted by gotalife
May 2, 2008 6:19 PM
May 3, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
He should release his birth certificate to end this RW smear.
What is he hiding?
May 3, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
You should release DNA evidence that you are not, in fact, Howard Wolfson's left testicle.
What do you have to hide?
May 3, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
hehe
May 3, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, I heard Hillary carved a Swastika into the forehead of the cat she had as a child and set it aflame. She should produce the corpse to counter this right-wing smear. I mean, I'm not accusing her of anything but you know those Republicans will!
May 3, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Half the delegates in Guam? Seriously? Are you being snarky?? Superdelegates impressed?
I'll tell you want the superdelegates are thinking about right now. That damn gas tax bullshit that no one with half a brain thinks is a good idea. It is a BAD idea to push the people you are trying to influence into a corner by your endless pandering over what will amount to 20 bucks a person. BAAAAAAAAAAD... and proof that Hillary doesn;t give a shit about the downticket democrats.
Annnnnnnnd
That little story about the Indiana factory that sent it's jobs to China during the Clinton administration that Bayh wrote a lovely memo about a few years back. Sweet Jesus, Barack Obama..... BUST THAT OUT IN A COMMERCIAL!!!!!!!
May 3, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. 1995 agreement was premised on agreement that jobs and production would remain in the United States.
David Cay Johnston: Clinton administration imposed condition 'that the new owners keep magnet production and technology in the United States.' [Free Lunch, pp. 38-39]
Evan Bayh: Investors in 1995 'promised to maintain U.S. production of the magnets.' “The U.S. high-performance magnet industry has been hit hard in recent years by China' efforts to dominate the market. Five years ago, the state lost more than 225 jobs when Chinese investors moved the operations of Indiana-based Magnaquench to China. Magnaquench, which had operations in Valparaiso and Anderson, was originally purchased in 1995 by a group of investors that included two Chinese companies. The investors promised to maintain U.S. production of the magnets but in 2003 backed out on that promise." [Press Release, 3/10/08]
2. 2003, President Bush failed to use his authority to block the movement of jobs and production overseas.
Bayh and Visclosky sought help from Bush Administration to halt the closing. “In September of 2003, Magnaquench was in the process of closing down their Indiana production plant, with intentions of moving operations to China, and headquarters to Singapore. This move is of particular interest to homeland security because this plant made 80% of the rare-earth magnets used in the construction of U.S. “smart bombs”. Democratic Representative Pete Visclosky and Senator Evan Bayh have been attempting to gain support from President Bush to halt the closing, citing national security concerns.” [Melanie Goodman, 6/16/04]
Bayh: 2003 decision 'raised new questions' about national security concerns because the jobs would be transferred. “We understand that CFIUS approved both the 1995 purchase of Magnequench by a consortium that included two Chinese companies and Magnequench's acquisition of the Valparaiso facility in 2000. However, the potential transfer of these operations to China raises new questions about maintaining both a significant source of domestic production of rare-earth magnets and U.S. technological leadership for these critical production technologies.” [Bayh letter to Bush, 3/6/03]
Bush Administration 'offered no response' to Congressional inquiries in 2003. “Then, when the Chinese owners in 2003 shut down Magnequench's Valparaiso, Ind. production plant and moved equipment to China, CFIUS offered no response when Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) requested an inquiry. Bayh became concerned that the Chinese might corner the market on a sensitive military technology. Defense Department contacts informed his staff that Magnequench provided 80 percent of the guidance magnets used in smart bombs. Still, CFIUS refused to provide information about its Magnequench review despite requests from Bayh and from two key Senate committees: the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees CFIUS, according to a former Senate aide who sought to contact CFIUS.” [Chicago Tribune, July 9, 2005]
It was w not President Clinton.
Why do you give w a free pass?
Are you a gop troll?
May 3, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok it's offical... I will no longer respond to or try to engage any sort of discussion with gotalife. That was your chance to prove that you were truly a thinking Democrat. I now know you are a McCain troll mixing up the shit. Your posts are dead to me.
NC Obama by 12
In Obama by 2
May 3, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
My record is good. I told you should win PA by 10.
May 3, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, you said 30.
May 3, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seconded.
You said 30 Gotalie
May 3, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many people saw gotalife predict Clinton in Pennsylvania by 30?
May 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Typo, I meant 10.
May 3, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, that does it... Im now convinced this is all a joke... it has to be. A typo?? You hit the 3 instead of the 1?? what???
May 3, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, typo.
I meant 10.
May 3, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you went for the 3... and hit the 1... then when people started saying how there was no way that would happen, no way she'd win by 30, etc, you didnt, I dont know, notice?
May 3, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too bad she won by 9
May 3, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm going to assume you writing "let's nominate Clinton so we'll win this time" was also a typo.
May 3, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bullshit.
You said she'd win PA by 20 ad nauseam.
And as Casey Stengel used to say: "you can look it up."
May 3, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
He was for 10 before he was for 30.
May 3, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
As in, he was for it before he was against it.
May 3, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Typo, I meant 10."
..your existence is a typo.
May 3, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are absolutely, positively, undeniably full of shit. Typo my ass.
May 3, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Sen. Edward M. Kennedy admitted yesterday that Barack Obama is running out of time to sew up the Democratic presidential nomination but remains “hopeful” the Illinois senator will overcome Hillary Clinton’s late surge."
Switch and go with your voters Senator.
Kerry too.
May 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Without the context of a link and the complete message, dont you think he was referring to closing out the nomination before it has to rely on Super-Delegates?
You could, of course, clarify it by providing actual, you know, links to your ass-hattery.
May 3, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clintons must be very proud to have the undying support of Gotalife, the Racist Scumbag Aryan Nation Troll(ANT)
Here is what that pet sewer rat of the Grand Wizard wrote yesterday.
=============================================
Among the many allegations in the chain email is one about Obama’s name: “By the way. His true name is Barak Hussein Muhammed Obama. Won’t that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran!” That's blatantly not true, as far as we know. But the campaign still won't release his birth certificate which
perhaps is adding fuel to the rumor."
Uh oh.
Posted by gotalife
May 2, 2008 6:19 PM
May 3, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
dem dave. I am not sure if i was being snarky, but we generally agree. This media hype about game changing and how hillary is going to impress the superdelegates is a lot of garbage. She could win all four(she won't, of course)--and it would not make any difference.
I gotta sharpen my snarking skills.
May 3, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why isnt TPM posting the Guam resultsas they come in? Does Guam not count?
May 3, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama 899
Clinton 769
63% reporting.
There ya go.
May 3, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
That depends... it was looking like it wasn't going to count, but now Clintons surged to within 6 I think, so it looks like it may end up counting after all. We'll have to wait a while to see probably.
May 3, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, the lead has gone "back" to 8 (54 to 46b @63%). So, Greg & Eric can relax !!!
http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/state?state=GU&ref=ipb
May 3, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/3/101037/4372/238/508280
up to date reporting.
O 54%
C 46%
as of right now.
May 3, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course not silly - it's a caucus
May 3, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
They'll split the 4 delegates evenly unless Obama wins by more than 63%, in which case he would get a net +2 delegates. Nice, but not big news I guess.
May 3, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Four more delegates off the board is bad news for Hillary.
May 3, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Roger Simon on Hillary's Rules
http://www.creators.com/opinion/roger-simon.html
May 3, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton will win NC.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/us/politics/03campaign.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=politics&adxnnlx=1209834512-VF0cM7GU3mqvCuEm9lZBmg
May 3, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You sure thats not a typo?
May 3, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Clinton will win NC."
Horseshit.
May 3, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come Wednesday, you'll be claiming that was a typo.
May 3, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
We should probably ask got30lies how he defines a "win". He will be spinning something fierce after Tuesday. Just like Slick Willy, it depends on what your definiton of is is.
May 3, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
May 02, 2008 9:59 PM
ABC News' Eloise Harper and Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., had to endure cheers for Sen. Barack Obama and boos for the North Carolina governor, who has backed her, at the North Carolina Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson dinner in Raleigh, N.C., Friday evening -- where both she and Obama spoke.
Toward the end of her speech, Clinton pointed out to the crowd that she thinks she is tough, saying to the crowd, “I am no shrinking violet.”
Clinton, attempting to show that there will be party unity, said, “If Sen. Obama is the nominee, you better believe I'll work my heart out for him.”
The crowd erupted into a chant for Obama, leaving Clinton speechless for a few seconds while she waited for them to finish. During her speech, Clinton also mentioned Gov. Mike Easley, who has endorsed her candidacy, and she was momentarily rendered speechless while the crowd booed him.
In his speech, Obama also preached unity, saying that after the nomination process is over, “This party will come together. If Hillary Clinton were the nominee, I would support her in a heartbeat. And I know that if I am the nominee then she will support me.”
But he again criticized Clinton over her support of a national gas tax holiday, suggesting that Clinton is not being honest with the American people about the real savings they would receive under the proposal she backs along with Sen. John McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee.
"For us to suggest that 30 cents a day for three months is real relief, that that's a real energy policy, means that we are not tackling the problem that has to be tackled," Obama said. "We are offering gimmicks. When we are offering the same thing that John McCain is offering on the cheap, that means that we're not presenting a truthful response to the challenges that we face in America.”
May 3, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is with all the anti-TPM bile lately? I don't always agree with their take on things but they seem to be pretty even handed. Exaggerated on occasion (i.e landslide etc) but it seems equally done for both dems. I know the stuff they report isn't always good news to people but that doesn't make it TPM's fault.
Not saying they shouldn't be called out from time to time but I think there is a lot of shoot-the-messenger going on. JMO.
Anyway - Obamanites should feel heartened. It appears the bleeding has stopped and Obama is on his way back up. Gallup's poll today shows the race is tied again - since it is a tracking poll, it means that he is beginning to have some decent polls again. By Monday he should be back in the lead. Rasmussen still has him going down but their methodology usually takes a few more days to show movement so it will take a while longer but by Monday he should be moving back up even if it takes a bit more time to regain the lead.
More worrisome is the vs McCain poll, this is where he is really hurting - among the indies & obamacans. However that too is showing some good signs as it is the same as yesterday, meaning the bleeding has stopped there as well. It will likely take longer for that to rebound but it will.
May 3, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear friends,
Guess what!!!Senator Obama is back on track on the Gallup poll.
The latest poll is now 47 to 47...It means that the bleeding set up by the media is over and that despite the efforts of Clintons and the media to tear Obama down did not work...
This is good news for Senator Obama...
Yes we can
Obama 08
May 3, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Guam looks to be a dead heat with 20 votes separating the two now (with Obama in the slight lead).
I hope Obama isn't taking NC for granted here. A win isn't a win, just like was the case for Hillary in Penn. He needs 7+ point win in NC.
The Gas Tax issue and the Bayh memo blaming the Clinton White Hhouse for the plant closing initially should really give Obama a boost in the final days before Indiana votes.
May 3, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another SC SD for Obama.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i7qdo43mtqGM0LGp45uX2TO6e8JQD90E8JH01
May 3, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those who favor Obama, I wouldn't get too excited by the latest (or any) Zogby poll. I clearly recall seeing Zogby on MSNBC in April 2004, where he flatly and unequivocally predicted a Kerry win in November. Hopefully his polling methods have improved since then.
May 3, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um Agberg : Zogby called PA for Clinton by 10 points.
I also see that Obama is holding on to his lead in Guam with just one more district to hear from.
May 3, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm waiting for the next SNL skit...that will
influence the MSM. Is it me or since the
debate skit on SNL making fun of the MSM, haven't they all just created their own skit of reversing themselves so not to be the "idoits" in that skit? I rarely watch MSM but I've view several of the links provided here and I laugh because I assume they are joking.....but they aren't.
May 3, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
While the media loves to breakdown every demographic...old, young, rich, poor, educated, uneducated, blue collar, beer drinkers, bowlers and more....for some verrrrry interesting reason....they never mention...
HILLARY HAS LOST THE ENTIRE BLACK VOTE....POSSIBLY FOREVER !!!This is the message currently being sent by blacks to the DNC (and the superdelegates)in great numbers. There is NO WAY Hillary will defeat McCain without the support of Black America aka the guaranteed Democratic vote. Please read Huffington Posts story on how the Hillary Camp has been feeding Obama attacks TO THE GOP !!!!! What a traitor to the Democratic Party !!!!!!!! For those who didn't know, Hillary started her campaign with 82% of the black support. But as Blacks learned more about her (Goldwater Girl...possibly Against Civil Rights Act '64....It was LBJ...Not MLK....etc) combined with Bill's (...fairy tale....Jessie Won S.C. too...etc.)...blacks were shocked beyond repair. (remember....we luved Bill so much we called him 'The First Black President')....but never again....WHERE'S THAT STORY.
And if the DNC thinks.....'ohhhhhh....the blacks will be angry at first...but they'll come around'.....then they don't know the severity of what the Clinton's have done....This has nothing to do with Obama !!!! We (blacks) have awakened to the truth about the Clintons......and with more exposure like the recent Huff story re: Hill's feeding the GOP Obama smears...our friends of ALL races will awaken soon !!!!!!!!!...THAT'S THE REAL STORY !!!!
Greg Jones
www.Blacks4Barack.org
(A Multi-Racial, Grassroots Org...Dedicated To Truth)
p.s. Blacks4Barack.org was started in Feb. 2007 (by Greg Jones) because of the fact that VERY few blacks were for Obama at that time.....they were ALL for Hillary !!!!! We knew that Obama was the best person to run our country and bring our troops home and that is why we started our grassroots organization with a mission to increase black voter registration and to invigorate support for Obama. (Not because he's black...but because he's most qualified) The more black voters learned about Obama...the more they liked him....and the more they learned about the Clintons....the angrier they got !!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are appreciative of our friends of ALL races....who are working together....for the very best candidate....to put America on the right track.....Barack Obama ! THANK YOU !
May 3, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
New Zogby poll in Indiana today: Obama inches ahead, leading by two points and holding a steady 9 point lead in NC.
Man what a shock for the MSM if he pulled out both states !
May 4, 2008 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink